fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits
fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.25850 | 2461349.75850 | 13.04 | 03:40:48.95 +13:19:58.5 | 5884 2782 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.25909 | 2461349.75909 | 13.02 | 03:40:48.92 +13:19:58.5 | 5890 2784 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.2588 2461349.7588 13.03 03:40:48.93 +13:19:58.5
173.80436 -32.33813 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
443 Photographica -0 -0 1 12.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:40:48.93 +13:19:58.5: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:40:48.93 +13:19:58.5: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.25850 | 2461349.75850 | 13.36 | 03:28:24.85 +16:37:22.7 | 4088 4785 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.25909 | 2461349.75909 | 13.33 | 03:28:24.82 +16:37:22.4 | 4094 4787 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.2588 2461349.7588 13.35 03:28:24.83 +16:37:22.6
168.56269 -32.00611 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
131 Vala -1 0 1 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:28:24.83 +16:37:22.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:28:24.83 +16:37:22.6: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.25850 | 2461349.75850 | 13.45 | 03:40:56.34 +15:47:45.3 | 5903 4271 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.25909 | 2461349.75909 | 13.45 | 03:40:56.32 +15:47:45.0 | 5909 4274 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.2588 2461349.7588 13.45 03:40:56.33 +15:47:45.2
171.79930 -30.56557 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
742 Edisona 0 0 0 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:40:56.33 +15:47:45.2: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:40:56.33 +15:47:45.2: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.25850 | 2461349.75850 | 14.30 | 03:38:05.95 +14:39:46.0 | 5487 3587 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.25909 | 2461349.75909 | 14.29 | 03:38:05.91 +14:39:45.4 | 5493 3589 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.2588 2461349.7588 14.29 03:38:05.93 +14:39:45.7
172.14755 -31.85581 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
1350 Rosselia -0 -0 0 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:38:05.93 +14:39:45.7: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:38:05.93 +14:39:45.7: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.25850 | 2461349.75850 | 14.69 | 03:39:31.90 +18:06:50.2 | 5702 5678 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.25909 | 2461349.75909 | 14.71 | 03:39:31.81 +18:06:50.1 | 5707 5680 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.2588 2461349.7588 14.70 03:39:31.86 +18:06:50.1
169.67596 -29.11821 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
1576 Fabiola 0 0 0 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:39:31.86 +18:06:50.1: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:39:31.86 +18:06:50.1: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.25850 | 2461349.75850 | 14.76 | 03:17:11.02 +14:20:48.3 | 2422 3441 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.25909 | 2461349.75909 | 14.74 | 03:17:11.00 +14:20:48.9 | 2427 3443 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.2588 2461349.7588 14.75 03:17:11.01 +14:20:48.6
167.90557 -35.49921 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
1336 Zeelandia -1 -0 1 14.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:17:11.01 +14:20:48.6: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:17:11.01 +14:20:48.6: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=local (lib/catalogs/local_star_catalog -> local copy: Gaia DR2 gaia_source, G < 19.0, built from https://cdn.gea.esac.esa.int/Gaia/gdr2/gaia_source/csv on 2026-11-04) The APASS known-star check of the candidates is disabled (see the note in util/transients/report_transient.sh) WARNING: VizieR is unreachable (no mirror answered the test query) - the online identification of candidates is degraded for this run INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Tau-05-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Tau-05-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing Tau-05-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 580134 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 580134 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits_preview.png'
Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits
renamed 'Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits_preview.png'
Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. Field altitude during imaging: 64.4 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Field altitude during imaging: 64.5 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 561.0491 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 523.9986 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1001.8024 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 513.7592 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1001.5562 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 513.4958 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.78559 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 10.3299999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 10.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-05T00:12:04.8191283' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T06:12:04.8191283' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.2583891088 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T06:12:14.7202302' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.2585037039 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 53.3309482173171 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0002418101061 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 64.4175 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 135.841666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.10836676220085 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '03 33 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20666 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20666 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 10.3299999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 10.3299999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 81.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 10.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 11.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.800464 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/d_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits :) Spent 0.676189 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/d_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 10.2600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 10.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-05T00:12:55.0329141' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T06:12:55.0329141' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.2589702778 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T06:13:04.9337954' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.2590848729 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 53.3309481988197 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0002418136428 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 64.5380555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 136.219444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.10725638853453 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '03 33 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20666 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20666 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 10.2600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 10.2600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 81.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 10.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 11.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.800464 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/d_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits :) Spent 0.683627 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/d_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits
fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461349.75850485 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:33:20.621 +14:00:27.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 Second-epoch image center 03:33:20.621 +14:00:27.22 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0094 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:33:18.192 +14:00:14.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 Second-epoch image center 03:33:18.192 +14:00:14.59 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0106 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 03:33:20.621 +14:00:27.22 Second-epoch second image center 03:33:18.192 +14:00:14.59 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01043 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2BHhdMG64o Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.scE54FIsXV Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vpCaNqdIvm Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BjjjgkYmXh Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.950750 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.950750 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec +8.6182 to +19.2791 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec 8.6182 to 19.2791 deg Loaded 4354 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3736 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3736 out of 7722 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 2.0 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 2.3 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits 2.3 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 15.6 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 15.6 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits 15.6 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.2BHhdMG64o (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=551, bad_region=1716, passed=7716 Got 7716 stars (including 5573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6339 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6339 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6339 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1724 n_q2=1005 n_q3=1514 n_q4=651 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.261 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4894 N_valid=4894 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.000 median_sep_arcsec=0.265 p95_sep_arcsec=0.766 n_q1=1724 n_q2=1005 n_q3=1514 n_q4=651 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.scE54FIsXV (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=536, bad_region=1716, passed=7722 Got 7722 stars (including 5589 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6342 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6342 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6342 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1731 n_q2=1006 n_q3=1513 n_q4=648 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4898 N_valid=4898 bias_ra_arcsec=0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=0.008 median_sep_arcsec=0.267 p95_sep_arcsec=0.774 n_q1=1731 n_q2=1006 n_q3=1513 n_q4=648 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.vpCaNqdIvm (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=446, bad_region=1982, passed=7752 Got 7752 stars (including 5419 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7752 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5374) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=8.263 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.823 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.823 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.463 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.802 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.802 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.347 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.439 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.439 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4888 robust_rms_before=1.028 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.345 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.347 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.455 worst_region_rms_after=0.439 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.056 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.439 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.455 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.455 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.345 arcsec matched=4888 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=1244 n_q2=804 n_q3=1767 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4888 N_valid=4888 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.462 bias_dec_arcsec=0.727 median_sep_arcsec=0.984 p95_sep_arcsec=1.706 n_q1=1244 n_q2=804 n_q3=1767 n_q4=1073 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.BjjjgkYmXh (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=446, bad_region=1965, passed=7769 Got 7769 stars (including 5450 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7769 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6210 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6210 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6210 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=8.312 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.922 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.922 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.445 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.883 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.883 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.333 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.414 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.414 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4893 robust_rms_before=1.014 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.336 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.333 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.443 worst_region_rms_after=0.414 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.039 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.414 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.443 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.443 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.336 arcsec matched=4893 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=1246 n_q2=811 n_q3=1772 n_q4=1064 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4893 N_valid=4893 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.462 bias_dec_arcsec=0.717 median_sep_arcsec=0.966 p95_sep_arcsec=1.708 n_q1=1246 n_q2=811 n_q3=1772 n_q4=1064 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.261 ref2=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.264 new1=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.074 new2=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.125 reference average sigma_overall=0.3205 worst_q_ratio=1.2625 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137_astrometric_residuals.png (4894 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328_astrometric_residuals.png (4888 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:21:42.79 +16:16:51.8: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:38:10.30 +13:46:02.6: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:43:26.68 +12:49:58.5: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:34:00.85 +16:04:03.5: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:38:55.29 +16:23:48.3: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:29:23.57 +13:29:49.5: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:43:26.68 +12:49:58.5: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:34:00.85 +16:04:03.5: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:29:23.57 +13:29:49.5: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:38:55.29 +16:23:48.3: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:26.68 +12:49:58.5: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3646 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:21:42.79 +16:16:51.8: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:38:10.30 +13:46:02.6: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:00.85 +16:04:03.5: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4131 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:23.57 +13:29:49.5: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4296 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:55.29 +16:23:48.3: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3488 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:21:42.79 +16:16:51.8: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4167 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:10.30 +13:46:02.6: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4204 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20313_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 20313_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 12.40 03:21:42.79 +16:16:51.7 3112 4597 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 12.44 03:21:42.78 +16:16:51.8 3118 4598 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20314_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 20314_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 12.35 03:38:55.26 +16:23:48.6 5610 4635 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 12.35 03:38:55.32 +16:23:48.0 5616 4637 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21463_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 21463_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 12.35 03:43:26.69 +12:49:58.6 6272 2480 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 12.38 03:43:26.67 +12:49:58.3 6278 2482 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21524_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 21524_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 12.42 03:38:10.30 +13:46:02.6 5496 3046 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 12.43 03:38:10.30 +13:46:02.5 5502 3048 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21527_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 21527_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 12.42 03:34:00.84 +16:04:03.5 4897 4439 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 12.41 03:34:00.86 +16:04:03.5 4903 4441 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21533_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 21533_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 12.43 03:29:23.57 +13:29:49.5 4206 2893 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 12.43 03:29:23.57 +13:29:49.5 4212 2895 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:33:20.621 +14:00:27.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 Second-epoch image center 03:33:20.621 +14:00:27.22 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0094 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:33:18.192 +14:00:14.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 Second-epoch image center 03:33:18.192 +14:00:14.59 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0106 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 03:33:20.621 +14:00:27.22 Second-epoch second image center 03:33:18.192 +14:00:14.59 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01043 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dVGOCnBWFl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A7n3eGTAfs Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MqU08GD1mK Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ukVsVT1oOQ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0..fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.817800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.817800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.97 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.85 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.85
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 48560 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec +8.6183 to +19.2794 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec 8.6183 to 19.2794 deg Loaded 4358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3320 out of 3753 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3753 out of 48560 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=4.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 42 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 1.9 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 2.2 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits 2.2 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.8 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 15.8 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 15.7 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits 15.7 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.7 (SNR ) 14.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.dVGOCnBWFl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2222, bad_region=8835, passed=48571 Got 48571 stars (including 37859 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48571 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41607 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41607 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41607 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1704 n_q2=988 n_q3=1521 n_q4=680 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4893 N_valid=4893 bias_ra_arcsec=0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.007 median_sep_arcsec=0.258 p95_sep_arcsec=0.743 n_q1=1704 n_q2=988 n_q3=1521 n_q4=680 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.A7n3eGTAfs (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2192, bad_region=8846, passed=48544 Got 48544 stars (including 37859 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48544 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41566 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41566 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41566 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5379) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=1702 n_q2=993 n_q3=1515 n_q4=681 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4891 N_valid=4891 bias_ra_arcsec=0.007 bias_dec_arcsec=0.011 median_sep_arcsec=0.257 p95_sep_arcsec=0.748 n_q1=1702 n_q2=993 n_q3=1515 n_q4=681 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.MqU08GD1mK (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2141, bad_region=8435, passed=43760 Got 43760 stars (including 33861 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43760 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4851 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37378 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37378 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37378 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5336) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=8.121 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.958 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.958 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=0.466 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.874 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.874 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=0.344 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.450 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.450 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4851 robust_rms_before=1.017 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.345 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.344 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.462 worst_region_rms_after=0.450 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.041 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.450 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.462 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.462 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.345 arcsec matched=4851 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=1281 n_q2=771 n_q3=1743 n_q4=1056 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4851 N_valid=4851 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.463 bias_dec_arcsec=0.716 median_sep_arcsec=0.973 p95_sep_arcsec=1.659 n_q1=1281 n_q2=771 n_q3=1743 n_q4=1056 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.ukVsVT1oOQ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2204, bad_region=8436, passed=43485 Got 43485 stars (including 33522 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43485 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37093 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37093 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37093 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5337) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=8.124 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.892 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.892 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=0.443 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.978 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.978 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=0.330 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.421 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.421 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4852 robust_rms_before=1.004 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.332 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.330 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.442 worst_region_rms_after=0.421 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.036 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.421 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.442 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.442 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.332 arcsec matched=4852 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits N_match=4852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=1271 n_q2=781 n_q3=1745 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4852 N_valid=4852 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.457 bias_dec_arcsec=0.708 median_sep_arcsec=0.958 p95_sep_arcsec=1.678 n_q1=1271 n_q2=781 n_q3=1745 n_q4=1055 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:27:12.47 +17:07:32.2: 14.81 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:24:03.75 +13:56:14.4: 15.45 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:11.69 +16:38:01.3: 14.38 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:48.18 +17:58:42.4: 14.84 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:48:04.56 +10:56:05.2: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:51:07.07 +10:01:08.0: 14.61 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:33:46.18 +13:28:20.2: 15.25 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:45:33.61 +12:52:24.9: 14.44 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:40:41.44 +18:04:18.6: 15.02 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:32:42.41 +16:18:07.1: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:24:03.75 +13:56:14.4: 15.03 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:51:07.07 +10:01:08.0: 14.75 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:27:12.47 +17:07:32.2: 14.84 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:48:04.56 +10:56:05.2: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:11.69 +16:38:01.3: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:33:46.18 +13:28:20.2: 15.08 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:27:12.47 +17:07:32.2: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=15.1489 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:40:41.44 +18:04:18.6: 14.78 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:07.07 +10:01:08.0: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7586 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:24:03.75 +13:56:14.4: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0621 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:33:46.18 +13:28:20.2: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0197 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:11.69 +16:38:01.3: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4772 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:04.56 +10:56:05.2: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3595 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:41.44 +18:04:18.6: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6547 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:48.18 +17:58:42.4: 14.88 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:45:33.61 +12:52:24.9: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:48.18 +17:58:42.4: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8673 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:33.61 +12:52:24.9: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5722 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:32:42.41 +16:18:07.1: 14.19 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:32:42.41 +16:18:07.1: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2512 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:28:24.83 +16:37:22.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:23:30.52 +17:10:26.4: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:32:32.75 +15:13:12.9: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:40:48.93 +13:19:58.5: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:40:56.33 +15:47:45.2: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:38:05.93 +14:39:45.7: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:33:53.54 +18:14:09.1: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:49:16.05 +17:48:05.5: 14.83 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:34:18.76 +10:38:19.6: 14.56 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:39:31.86 +18:06:50.1: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:23:30.52 +17:10:26.4: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:30.52 +17:10:26.4: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2810 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:40:48.93 +13:19:58.5: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:32:32.75 +15:13:12.9: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:32:32.75 +15:13:12.9: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6329 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:28:24.83 +16:37:22.6: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:33:53.54 +18:14:09.1: 14.29 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:38:05.93 +14:39:45.7: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:40:56.33 +15:47:45.2: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:33:53.54 +18:14:09.1: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4834 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:34:18.76 +10:38:19.6: 14.45 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:49:16.05 +17:48:05.5: 14.57 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:18.76 +10:38:19.6: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5274 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:16.05 +17:48:05.5: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5912 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:39:31.86 +18:06:50.1: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:17:11.01 +14:20:48.6: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:29:16.99 +15:01:16.5: 15.12 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:17:48.48 +17:50:35.8: 15.06 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:17:48.48 +17:50:35.8: 15.20 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:29:16.99 +15:01:16.5: 15.13 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:17:11.01 +14:20:48.6: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:48.48 +17:50:35.8: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9468 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:16.99 +15:01:16.5: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9904 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:30.79 +09:56:31.1: 15.09 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:26:48.95 +17:32:13.9: 15.52 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:30.79 +09:56:31.1: 15.39 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:30.79 +09:56:31.1: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9620 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:26:48.95 +17:32:13.9: 15.56 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.54 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:48.95 +17:32:13.9: ref_mag=15.54 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0998 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:21:25.90 +18:06:11.1: 15.30 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:15:02.57 +16:46:55.7: 15.49 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:21:25.90 +18:06:11.1: 15.31 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:21:25.90 +18:06:11.1: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1257 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:15:02.57 +16:46:55.7: 15.19 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:15:02.57 +16:46:55.7: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1573 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:45:39.01 +17:05:43.2: 15.58 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:47:56.99 +17:39:51.8: 15.62 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:45:39.01 +17:05:43.2: 15.57 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:39.01 +17:05:43.2: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1611 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:47:56.99 +17:39:51.8: 15.52 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:56.99 +17:39:51.8: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1378 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:42:54.15 +15:02:02.4: 15.13 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:16:54.57 +10:05:35.0: 15.62 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:42:54.15 +15:02:02.4: 15.24 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:54.15 +15:02:02.4: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0302 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:16:54.57 +10:05:35.0: 15.43 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:16:54.57 +10:05:35.0: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9686 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:27:43.69 +16:56:30.5: 15.36 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:31:49.58 +15:08:05.0: 15.11 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:27:43.69 +16:56:30.5: 15.46 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:27:43.69 +16:56:30.5: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1502 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:20:55.11 +15:28:12.5: 16.02 +/- 0.30 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:31:49.58 +15:08:05.0: 14.96 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:49.58 +15:08:05.0: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0950 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:26:23.70 +16:25:57.3: 15.71 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:20:55.11 +15:28:12.5: 15.66 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.79 +/- 0.18 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:55.11 +15:28:12.5: ref_mag=15.79 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=15.2717 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:26:23.70 +16:25:57.3: 15.63 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.67 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:23.70 +16:25:57.3: ref_mag=15.67 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.2257 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:29:10.66 +12:44:56.5: 16.05 +/- 0.30 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:47:53.10 +11:36:22.8: 15.81 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:29:10.66 +12:44:56.5: 16.17 +/- 0.33 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.10 +/- 0.22 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:10.66 +12:44:56.5: ref_mag=16.10 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=15.2349 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:47:53.10 +11:36:22.8: 15.53 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.64 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:53.10 +11:36:22.8: ref_mag=15.64 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0723 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55013.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55509.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55776.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58147.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out59479.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out59598.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52905_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 52905_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 15.09 03:27:12.44 +17:07:31.1 3918 5092 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 15.23 03:27:12.49 +17:07:33.2 3924 5095 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52908_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 52908_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 15.03 03:24:03.83 +13:56:14.5 3428 3171 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 15.11 03:24:03.67 +13:56:14.3 3433 3173 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52909_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 52909_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 14.96 03:33:46.18 +13:28:19.6 4849 2871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 15.11 03:33:46.18 +13:28:20.9 4855 2873 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52910_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 52910_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 14.78 03:51:07.15 +10:01:07.6 7428 0773 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 14.75 03:51:07.00 +10:01:08.5 7434 0776 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52911_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 52911_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 14.97 03:18:48.18 +17:58:43.5 2712 5640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 14.79 03:18:48.17 +17:58:41.3 2717 5641 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52919_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 52919_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 14.63 03:45:33.61 +12:52:25.2 6584 2505 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 14.54 03:45:33.61 +12:52:24.6 6590 2507 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52920_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 52920_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 14.71 03:40:41.46 +18:04:18.6 5869 5652 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 14.61 03:40:41.42 +18:04:18.5 5874 5654 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52921_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 52921_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 14.55 03:35:28.41 +09:54:41.1 5092 0714 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52925_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 52925_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 14.53 03:18:11.69 +16:38:00.7 2604 4824 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 14.44 03:18:11.68 +16:38:02.0 2610 4826 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52929_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 52929_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 14.32 03:48:04.58 +10:56:05.4 6966 1330 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 14.40 03:48:04.53 +10:56:04.9 6972 1332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52931_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 52931_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 14.22 03:32:42.40 +16:18:08.5 4709 4583 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 14.29 03:32:42.42 +16:18:05.8 4714 4585 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52933_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 52933_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 13.64 03:28:01.79 +18:05:24.3 4051 5679 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 03:28:01.84 +18:05:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52936_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 52936_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 12.66 03:32:32.72 +15:13:13.0 4679 3929 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 12.61 03:32:32.78 +15:13:12.8 4685 3931 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55013_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 Preparing report for the candidate 55013_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55509_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 Preparing report for the candidate 55509_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55638_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 55638_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 13.48 03:36:02.17 +16:29:19.6 5198 4694 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 03:36:02.17 +16:29:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55776_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 Preparing report for the candidate 55776_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57795_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 57795_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 14.28 03:23:30.55 +17:10:27.7 3383 5133 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 14.28 03:23:30.49 +17:10:25.2 3389 5134 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58147_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 Preparing report for the candidate 58147_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58301_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 58301_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=1.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 14.39 03:33:53.52 +18:14:08.9 4890 5755 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 14.65 03:33:53.56 +18:14:09.2 4896 5757 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58965_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 58965_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=1.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 14.53 03:34:18.71 +10:38:20.2 4916 1156 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 14.53 03:34:18.80 +10:38:18.9 4922 1157 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59167_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 59167_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 14.59 03:49:16.13 +17:48:09.8 7110 5499 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 14.59 03:49:15.97 +17:48:01.2 7115 5499 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59479_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 Preparing report for the candidate 59479_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59598_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 Preparing report for the candidate 59598_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59795_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 59795_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=2.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 14.82 03:17:48.48 +17:50:36.1 2566 5561 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 15.20 03:17:48.47 +17:50:35.5 2571 5563 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60285_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 60285_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 14.92 03:29:16.86 +15:01:16.8 4202 3814 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 15.12 03:29:17.11 +15:01:16.1 4208 3816 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60336_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 60336_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 14.91 03:18:30.88 +09:56:32.0 2550 0763 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 15.03 03:18:30.70 +09:56:30.3 2556 0765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60592_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 60592_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 15.05 03:26:48.97 +17:32:13.6 3865 5343 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 15.22 03:26:48.93 +17:32:14.2 3871 5345 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60721_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 60721_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 15.11 03:15:02.64 +16:46:56.4 2147 4928 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 15.26 03:15:02.49 +16:46:55.0 2152 4930 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60895_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 60895_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 15.08 03:21:25.94 +18:06:10.3 3094 5705 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 15.18 03:21:25.86 +18:06:11.9 3099 5707 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60981_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 60981_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 15.04 03:45:39.10 +17:05:42.2 6587 5062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 15.41 03:45:38.92 +17:05:44.2 6592 5065 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 61006_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 61006_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 15.06 03:47:56.96 +17:39:53.0 6919 5412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 15.29 03:47:57.01 +17:39:50.6 6925 5414 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 61055_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 61055_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 15.06 03:16:54.55 +10:05:35.6 2312 0860 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 14.91 03:16:54.59 +10:05:34.5 2318 0861 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 61064_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 61064_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 15.03 03:42:54.10 +15:02:02.5 6190 3811 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 15.03 03:42:54.20 +15:02:02.2 6196 3813 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 61078_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 61078_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 15.14 03:27:43.75 +16:56:29.4 3992 4980 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 15.16 03:27:43.63 +16:56:31.6 3997 4982 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 61120_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 61120_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 15.09 03:31:49.59 +15:08:05.3 4574 3878 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 15.10 03:31:49.57 +15:08:04.7 4579 3880 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 61156_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 61156_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 15.15 03:20:55.10 +15:28:11.9 2985 4108 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 15.55 03:20:55.12 +15:28:13.1 2991 4110 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 61169_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 61169_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 15.12 03:26:23.75 +16:25:58.6 3794 4675 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 15.40 03:26:23.66 +16:25:56.0 3800 4676 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 61317_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 61317_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 15.15 03:29:10.66 +12:44:57.0 4169 2441 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 15.38 03:29:10.65 +12:44:55.9 4175 2443 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 61488_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 61488_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.25850 2461349.75850 15.09 03:47:53.18 +11:36:22.3 6934 1738 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0328.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 15.06 03:47:53.02 +11:36:23.4 6940 1740 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 09165_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 09165_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 13.19 03:28:13.08 +17:36:05.5 4074 5381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30706_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 The candidate 30706_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461049.67170: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461049.67237: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.25909 2461349.75909 14.06 03:28:46.92 +13:19:59.0 4121 2797 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_001611_TTUQ2b1x1_1715487_dzFdgEnC/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_00-12-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.6") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 14s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 03:40:48.93 +13:19:58.5 03:28:24.83 +16:37:22.6 03:40:56.33 +15:47:45.2 03:38:05.93 +14:39:45.7 03:39:31.86 +18:06:50.1 03:17:11.01 +14:20:48.6 ########### Completed Tau-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 03:40:48.93 +13:19:58.5 03:28:24.83 +16:37:22.6 03:40:56.33 +15:47:45.2 03:38:05.93 +14:39:45.7 03:39:31.86 +18:06:50.1 03:17:11.01 +14:20:48.6 ################################################################################### 03:40:48.93 +13:19:58.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 03:28:24.83 +16:37:22.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 03:40:56.33 +15:47:45.2 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 03:38:05.93 +14:39:45.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 03:39:31.86 +18:06:50.1 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 03:17:11.01 +14:20:48.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.75850485 -observatory V36 14:33:54.29 -15:14:55.7 Mercury (6.3mag) 13:23:18.89 -12:52:12.0 Venus (-4.5mag) 09:33:16.66 +16:18:04.1 Mars (0.8mag) 09:47:55.93 +14:02:14.0 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:36:00.14 +00:58:15.0 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:08:43.96 +20:49:21.1 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:08:11.76 -00:39:07.4 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:32.63 -23:41:13.8 Pluto (14.5mag) 11:39:51.96 -00:43:57.2 Moon (-9.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Nov 5 00:18 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.75850485: 09:47:49.39 +14:02:52.3 Io (6.0mag) 09:48:05.56 +14:01:18.2 Europa (6.1mag) 09:47:43.73 +14:03:25.8 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:48:24.57 +13:59:32.1 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:49:30.84 +14:10:28.5 Himalia (15.5mag) 09:47:53.38 +14:02:28.3 Thebe (16.3mag) 09:47:48.46 +14:27:19.5 Elara (17.4mag) 09:48:32.17 +13:30:37.3 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 09:44:50.29 +14:34:25.9 Carme (18.7mag) 00:36:12.25 +00:57:59.6 Titan (8.3mag) 00:35:54.84 +00:58:06.6 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:36:33.10 +00:59:16.1 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:35:56.28 +00:57:44.2 Hyperion (14.2mag) 00:34:13.41 +00:46:09.9 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 5 00:18 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.75850485: 04:41:14.41 +16:52:08.5 JWST 19:04:54.62 +00:47:32.9 Chandra 06:42:43.98 +06:41:09.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 5 00:18 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.75850485 -observatory V36 03:32:15.67 +19:54:04.7 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:47:11.14 +38:31:08.4 17.8mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:47:16.53 +38:30:55.6 17.8mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:46:34.74 +38:31:16.1 17.8mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:01:23.33 +38:46:59.3 17.7mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:50:09.88 -32:49:13.2 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:45:22.95 -74:01:21.5 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:10:58.86 +35:21:32.1 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 21:43:03.12 +20:29:34.9 17.9mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:35:50.86 +25:20:24.1 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:08:41.63 +38:47:52.6 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:38:15.67 +40:51:29.6 17.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:42:25.39 -13:30:48.7 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 14:17:18.44 -04:43:49.0 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 20:21:39.07 +51:51:51.9 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 13:09:18.98 +17:14:52.9 17.7mag A/2026 E1 15:56:03.91 -66:29:57.3 14.7mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:35:53.51 -05:23:36.6 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 10:46:54.00 +02:36:56.5 17.5mag P/2026 U1 (Gafton) 23:24:40.68 +13:34:33.7 16.9mag 2P/Encke 23:28:28.05 -25:15:13.6 15.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:42:10.54 +29:34:38.2 16.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:27:17.91 -10:11:03.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:10:03.81 -08:59:14.4 15.9mag 65P/Gunn 08:01:34.55 +13:24:14.0 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 20:56:40.80 -24:19:45.5 16.5mag 84P/Giclas 10:41:48.78 +13:12:44.8 17.6mag 93P/Lovas 09:05:49.37 +46:20:31.4 16.8mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:54:33.73 +04:53:34.0 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:30:26.30 +07:38:15.3 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 23:26:14.10 -00:57:09.7 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 19:44:53.45 +14:53:01.1 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 11:15:57.37 -03:25:47.4 16.3mag 169P/NEAT 09:42:19.44 +23:24:53.3 18.0mag 186P/Garradd 03:08:56.18 +02:03:46.0 15.4mag 220P/McNaught 06:22:41.41 +50:04:47.8 15.9mag 260P/McNaught 07:58:19.89 +25:02:36.9 17.5mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Nov 5 00:18 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:58:35.28 +22:20:06.50 ASASSN-26fs 2026-11-2.4 12.31 02:29:41.13 -71:57:55.60 ASASSN-26fr 2026-11-1.22 13.7 21:27:22.43 -18:15:42.10 SN 2026agsu 2026-10-29.85 -1.08 17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92 10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27 21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82 01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9 01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88 00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 5 00:18 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 5 00:18 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:53:40.597 +65:17:02.64 AT 2026afyq 2026-09-27.00 27.37 17:54:09.428 +65:16:55.00 AT 2026afyp 2026-09-27.00 26.33 17:53:48.917 +65:14:08.09 AT 2026afyo 2026-09-27.00 28.45 17:54:06.374 +65:12:07.03 AT 2026afyn 2026-09-27.00 27.53 17:54:12.378 +65:11:36.46 AT 2026afym 2026-09-27.00 27.72 17:54:06.270 +65:11:07.40 AT 2026afyl 2026-09-27.00 25.92 17:53:27.005 +65:10:54.26 AT 2026afyk 2026-09-27.00 27.33 17:54:11.180 +65:09:41.88 AT 2026afyj 2026-09-27.00 26.3 17:53:38.059 +65:08:44.42 AT 2026afyi 2026-09-27.00 27.21 17:54:21.568 +65:08:31.22 AT 2026afyh 2026-09-27.00 24.81 17:54:22.489 +65:08:12.98 AT 2026afyg 2026-09-27.00 27.34 17:54:12.363 +65:07:56.68 AT 2026afyf 2026-09-27.00 25.37 17:53:32.198 +65:12:13.26 AT 2026afye 2026-08-07.00 27.52 17:54:17.450 +65:10:55.80 AT 2026afyd 2026-08-07.00 26.19 17:53:34.001 +65:15:33.76 AT 2026afyc 2026-05-27.00 27.28 17:53:39.791 +65:16:43.84 AT 2026afyb 2026-03-28.00 26.7 01:07:23.505 +32:00:53.10 AT 2026afya 2026-10-11.48 20.5 06:56:31.236 +52:33:55.44 AT 2026afxz 2026-10-06.58 20.74 04:59:34.078 -09:52:21.92 AT 2026afxy 2026-10-12.52 19.8 01:14:09.805 -13:39:55.41 AT 2026afxx 2026-10-06.43 19.69 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 5 00:18 tns_transients_list.txt
JD 2461049.67170: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461049.67237: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75850: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.75909: SE_FLAGS=2.
