util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.22345 | 2461349.72345 | 8.73 | 01:00:27.99 -20:05:56.5 | 3758 4450 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.22402 | 2461349.72402 | 8.79 | 01:00:27.92 -20:05:55.6 | 3754 4455 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.2237 2461349.7237 8.76 01:00:27.96 -20:05:56.0
139.79045 -82.67333 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
2 Pallas -1 -0 1 8.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:00:27.96 -20:05:56.0: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:00:27.96 -20:05:56.0: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.22345 | 2461349.72345 | 12.76 | 01:08:55.66 -14:29:12.2 | 2633 1032 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.22402 | 2461349.72402 | 12.77 | 01:08:55.68 -14:29:12.1 | 2629 1037 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.2237 2461349.7237 12.77 01:08:55.67 -14:29:12.1
141.67303 -76.71781 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
166 Rhodope -1 -0 1 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:08:55.67 -14:29:12.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:08:55.67 -14:29:12.1: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.22345 | 2461349.72345 | 13.98 | 00:24:35.71 -17:49:21.6 | 8961 3377 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.22402 | 2461349.72402 | 13.80 | 00:24:35.71 -17:49:21.6 | 8957 3382 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.2237 2461349.7237 13.89 00:24:35.71 -17:49:21.6
87.90605 -78.82362 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
893 Leopoldina -0 -0 0 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:24:35.71 -17:49:21.6: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:24:35.71 -17:49:21.6: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=local (lib/catalogs/local_star_catalog -> local copy: Gaia DR2 gaia_source, G < 19.0, built from https://cdn.gea.esac.esa.int/Gaia/gdr2/gaia_source/csv on 2026-11-04) The APASS known-star check of the candidates is disabled (see the note in util/transients/report_transient.sh) WARNING: VizieR is unreachable (no mirror answered the test query) - the online identification of candidates is degraded for this run INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Cet-10-Q1b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Cet-10-Q1b1x1 ########### Processing Cet-10-Q1b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 599187 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 599187 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits_preview.png'
Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
renamed 'Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits_preview.png'
Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. Field altitude during imaging: 37.6 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Field altitude during imaging: 37.6 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1164.6233 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 463.0200 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1461.4682 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 506.0666 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1460.8122 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 505.2518 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.25488 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 14.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 11.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-04T23:21:36.3441467' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T05:21:36.3441467' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.223337315 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T05:21:46.2451718' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.2234519096 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 13.3306209851443 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9995779851427 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.6405555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 191.219722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.63481603647396 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 53 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29467 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29467 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 14.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 14.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 77.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 11.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 26.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.200176 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits :) Spent 0.628822 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 14.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 11.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-04T23:22:25.4350707' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T05:22:25.4350707' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.2239054977 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T05:22:35.3380482' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.2240201156 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 13.3306210081788 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9995779560355 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.6063888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 191.466944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.63607499228247 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 53 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29467 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29467 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 14.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 14.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 77.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 11.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 26.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.200176 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits :) Spent 0.625515 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461349.72345306 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Image size: 941.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:33.604 -17:57:01.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:33.604 -17:57:01.18 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0840 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:32.218 -17:56:27.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:32.218 -17:56:27.50 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0875 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:53:33.604 -17:57:01.18 Second-epoch second image center 00:53:32.218 -17:56:27.50 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01085 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4Nr4CkMX9M Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4yzoKHOba1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PX0Ijpw4US Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t3l2ylvuXA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.886450 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.886450 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg Loaded 4161 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2348 out of 2396 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2396 out of 4144 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 2.1 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 15.0 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 15.2 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 15.2 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.4Nr4CkMX9M (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=318, bad_region=0, passed=4470 Got 4470 stars (including 4148 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4069 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4067 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4470 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4069 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4470 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4470 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4067 stars left (next iteration limit 4473) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4067 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=970 n_q2=1070 n_q3=960 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4067 N_valid=4067 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.000 median_sep_arcsec=0.231 p95_sep_arcsec=0.709 n_q1=970 n_q2=1070 n_q3=960 n_q4=1067 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.4yzoKHOba1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=259, bad_region=1, passed=4144 Got 4144 stars (including 3880 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3804 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3800 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 3803 stars left (next iteration limit 4180) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=3803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=909 n_q2=1014 n_q3=908 n_q4=972 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3803 N_valid=3803 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.675 bias_dec_arcsec=0.892 median_sep_arcsec=3.575 p95_sep_arcsec=7.341 n_q1=909 n_q2=1014 n_q3=908 n_q4=972 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.PX0Ijpw4US (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=294, bad_region=0, passed=4434 Got 4434 stars (including 4132 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4434 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.3 to -12.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4054 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4052 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4052 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4052 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4434 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.3 to -12.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4054 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4052 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4434 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4052 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4434 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4052 stars left (next iteration limit 4457) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4052 robust_rms=13.774 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.501 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.501 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4052 robust_rms=0.531 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.641 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.641 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4052 robust_rms=0.302 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.341 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.276 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4052 robust_rms_before=1.060 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.302 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.339 worst_region_rms_after=0.341 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.165 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.276 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.339 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.339 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.296 arcsec matched=4052 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits N_match=4052 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=987 n_q2=986 n_q3=1050 n_q4=1029 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.099 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4052 N_valid=4052 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.640 bias_dec_arcsec=0.478 median_sep_arcsec=1.003 p95_sep_arcsec=1.761 n_q1=987 n_q2=986 n_q3=1050 n_q4=1029 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.t3l2ylvuXA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=308, bad_region=1, passed=4406 Got 4406 stars (including 4089 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4406 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.3 to -12.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4012 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4010 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4010 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4010 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4406 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.3 to -12.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4012 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4010 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4406 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4010 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4406 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4010 stars left (next iteration limit 4411) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4010 robust_rms=13.763 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.035 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.035 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4010 robust_rms=0.538 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.635 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.635 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4010 robust_rms=0.310 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.360 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.271 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4010 robust_rms_before=1.087 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.310 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.310 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.351 worst_region_rms_after=0.360 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.172 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.271 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.351 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.351 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.310 arcsec matched=4010 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits N_match=4010 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=980 n_q2=971 n_q3=1050 n_q4=1009 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4010 N_valid=4010 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.647 bias_dec_arcsec=0.486 median_sep_arcsec=1.011 p95_sep_arcsec=1.798 n_q1=980 n_q2=971 n_q3=1050 n_q4=1009 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits sigma_overall=0.277 worst_q_ratio=1.241 ref2=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits sigma_overall=0.289 worst_q_ratio=1.079 new1=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.099 new2=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits sigma_overall=0.312 worst_q_ratio=1.113 reference average sigma_overall=0.283 worst_q_ratio=1.16 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017_astrometric_residuals.png (4067 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067_astrometric_residuals.png (3803 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218_astrometric_residuals.png (4052 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219_astrometric_residuals.png (4010 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:20:10.93 -15:47:41.7: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:00:27.96 -20:05:56.0: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:58:18.92 -16:02:34.1: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:59:10.35 -18:44:46.1: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:58:18.92 -16:02:34.1: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:00:27.96 -20:05:56.0: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:20:10.93 -15:47:41.7: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:59:10.35 -18:44:46.1: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:18.92 -16:02:34.1: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9621 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:10.93 -15:47:41.7: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0473 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:59:10.35 -18:44:46.1: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9607 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20119.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20119_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 Preparing report for the candidate 20119_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20229_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 20229_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 11.95 00:59:10.32 -18:44:45.8 3970 3642 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 11.98 00:59:10.37 -18:44:46.4 3966 3648 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20232_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 20232_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 11.95 00:58:18.95 -16:02:34.7 4151 2021 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 11.97 00:58:18.90 -16:02:33.4 4148 2026 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20241_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 20241_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 12.03 01:20:10.92 -15:47:41.6 0968 1792 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 12.07 01:20:10.94 -15:47:41.8 0964 1797 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 01:00:27.96 -20:05:56.0 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Image size: 941.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:33.604 -17:57:01.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:33.604 -17:57:01.18 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0840 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:32.218 -17:56:27.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:32.218 -17:56:27.50 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0875 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:53:33.604 -17:57:01.18 Second-epoch second image center 00:53:32.218 -17:56:27.50 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01085 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1Wdfm838Ow Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DgRCGSkHkN Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SXPykw1TeM Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e78Pc8zVic Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0..fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.777200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.777200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 21682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg Loaded 4192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2550 out of 2661 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2661 out of 21682 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=4.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 60 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 2.0 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 15.2 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 15.4 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 15.4 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.1Wdfm838Ow (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=893, bad_region=1, passed=24280 Got 24280 stars (including 23344 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24280 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24280 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24280 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24280 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1223 n_q2=1268 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4897 N_valid=4897 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.232 p95_sep_arcsec=0.678 n_q1=1223 n_q2=1268 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1225 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.DgRCGSkHkN (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=669, bad_region=24, passed=21674 Got 21674 stars (including 20941 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21674 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21674 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21674 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21674 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5381) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1253 n_q2=1274 n_q3=1187 n_q4=1177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4891 N_valid=4891 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.540 bias_dec_arcsec=1.015 median_sep_arcsec=3.429 p95_sep_arcsec=7.359 n_q1=1253 n_q2=1274 n_q3=1187 n_q4=1177 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.SXPykw1TeM (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=839, bad_region=47, passed=24838 Got 24838 stars (including 23899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24838 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4856 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24838 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24838 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24838 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5341) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=13.218 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.278 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.278 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=0.548 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.655 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.655 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=0.310 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.348 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.278 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4858 robust_rms_before=1.057 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.306 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.310 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.347 worst_region_rms_after=0.348 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.164 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.278 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.347 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.347 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.306 arcsec matched=4858 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1237 n_q3=1207 n_q4=1170 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4858 N_valid=4858 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.634 bias_dec_arcsec=0.508 median_sep_arcsec=1.003 p95_sep_arcsec=1.757 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1237 n_q3=1207 n_q4=1170 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.e78Pc8zVic (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=865, bad_region=47, passed=24835 Got 24835 stars (including 23879 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24835 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.3 to -12.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24835 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.3 to -12.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24835 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24835 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5339) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=13.296 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.952 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.952 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.561 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.675 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.675 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.318 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.372 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.277 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4855 robust_rms_before=1.079 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.318 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.318 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.354 worst_region_rms_after=0.372 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.180 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.277 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.354 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.354 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.318 arcsec matched=4855 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1238 n_q2=1237 n_q3=1199 n_q4=1181 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.070 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4855 N_valid=4855 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.637 bias_dec_arcsec=0.514 median_sep_arcsec=1.011 p95_sep_arcsec=1.785 n_q1=1238 n_q2=1237 n_q3=1199 n_q4=1181 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:20:03.66 -13:03:13.4: 14.57 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:08:55.67 -14:29:12.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:35:23.88 -15:20:37.3: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:20:18.61 -22:41:13.6: 14.36 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:53:05.53 -22:28:39.4: 14.49 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:22:55.26 -20:38:54.0: 14.05 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:12:45.93 -14:19:21.5: 14.29 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:28:38.22 -22:27:00.9: 14.58 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:24:35.71 -17:49:21.6: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:20:03.66 -13:03:13.4: 14.71 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:08:55.67 -14:29:12.1: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:53:05.53 -22:28:39.4: 14.53 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:22:55.26 -20:38:54.0: 14.03 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:03.66 -13:03:13.4: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3724 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:20:18.61 -22:41:13.6: 14.27 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:05.53 -22:28:39.4: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4585 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:55.26 -20:38:54.0: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9739 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:35:23.88 -15:20:37.3: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:18.61 -22:41:13.6: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2422 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:23.88 -15:20:37.3: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9312 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:24:35.71 -17:49:21.6: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:12:45.93 -14:19:21.5: 14.35 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:12:45.93 -14:19:21.5: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2944 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:43:42.25 -19:45:39.5: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:28:38.22 -22:27:00.9: 14.61 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:38.22 -22:27:00.9: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2632 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:43:42.25 -19:45:39.5: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:43:42.25 -19:45:39.5: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3086 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:34:31.78 -22:31:41.6: 14.87 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:46:47.06 -22:46:54.1: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:21:39.63 -21:22:12.8: 14.37 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:33:10.88 -19:59:01.5: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:22:21.30 -14:32:51.0: 14.49 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:33:04.00 -21:26:56.1: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:34:31.78 -22:31:41.6: 14.81 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:24:31.56 -21:45:12.1: 14.75 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:34:31.78 -22:31:41.6: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4731 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:46:47.06 -22:46:54.1: 14.70 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:21:39.63 -21:22:12.8: 14.64 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:46:47.06 -22:46:54.1: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4938 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:33:10.88 -19:59:01.5: 14.84 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:39.63 -21:22:12.8: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3510 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:33:10.88 -19:59:01.5: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4327 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:22:21.30 -14:32:51.0: 14.36 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:21.30 -14:32:51.0: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2795 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:33:04.00 -21:26:56.1: 14.57 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:24:31.56 -21:45:12.1: 14.81 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:33:04.00 -21:26:56.1: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4793 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:22:44.15 -19:36:15.5: 14.53 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:24:31.56 -21:45:12.1: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5645 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:22:44.15 -19:36:15.5: 14.83 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:44.15 -19:36:15.5: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4309 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:31:35.29 -17:53:23.7: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:31:22.42 -19:57:08.5: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:36:50.25 -21:22:03.6: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:58:55.27 -21:19:14.3: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:31:35.29 -17:53:23.7: 14.98 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:32:41.80 -21:45:19.2: 14.84 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:35.29 -17:53:23.7: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4714 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:20:20.01 -17:40:06.4: 14.98 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:36:50.25 -21:22:03.6: 14.44 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:36:50.25 -21:22:03.6: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5030 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:58:55.27 -21:19:14.3: 14.85 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:55.27 -21:19:14.3: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5538 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:58:47.26 -14:41:48.5: 14.55 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:31:22.42 -19:57:08.5: 14.89 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:22.42 -19:57:08.5: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4168 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:32:41.80 -21:45:19.2: 14.66 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:14:30.59 -16:52:00.6: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:41.80 -21:45:19.2: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4750 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:20:20.01 -17:40:06.4: 14.84 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:20.01 -17:40:06.4: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6515 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:58:47.26 -14:41:48.5: 14.39 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:47.26 -14:41:48.5: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5677 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:14:30.59 -16:52:00.6: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:14:30.59 -16:52:00.6: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5623 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:22:28.02 -20:17:39.4: 14.49 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:22:41.52 -21:51:46.8: 14.69 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:23:37.59 -22:34:58.9: 14.66 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:21:20.86 -22:02:38.8: 15.14 +/- 0.30 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:25:30.03 -14:00:00.5: 14.69 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:31:13.09 -22:39:43.4: 14.62 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:22:41.52 -21:51:46.8: 14.91 +/- 0.28 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:22:28.02 -20:17:39.4: 14.56 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:28.02 -20:17:39.4: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3625 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:41.52 -21:51:46.8: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3830 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:23:37.59 -22:34:58.9: 14.78 +/- 0.26 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:37.59 -22:34:58.9: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4368 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:25:11.48 -22:03:56.1: 14.44 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:21:20.86 -22:02:38.8: 15.06 +/- 0.36 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:25:30.03 -14:00:00.5: 15.15 +/- 0.31 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.23 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:20.86 -22:02:38.8: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=14.5067 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:30.03 -14:00:00.5: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4685 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:24:32.04 -19:20:35.4: 14.60 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:31:13.09 -22:39:43.4: 14.59 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:13.09 -22:39:43.4: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4335 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:25:11.48 -22:03:56.1: 14.82 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:11.48 -22:03:56.1: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4895 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:24:32.04 -19:20:35.4: 14.90 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:32.04 -19:20:35.4: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5559 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:43:28.27 -18:03:25.5: 14.24 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:49:21.04 -19:06:33.5: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:35:56.21 -19:12:08.9: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:55:41.71 -13:25:12.0: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:24:44.50 -18:03:53.4: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:23:42.01 -17:10:02.2: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:43:28.27 -18:03:25.5: 14.30 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:43:28.27 -18:03:25.5: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5198 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:49:21.04 -19:06:33.5: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:35:56.21 -19:12:08.9: 14.64 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:49:21.04 -19:06:33.5: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4899 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:56.21 -19:12:08.9: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6116 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:55:41.71 -13:25:12.0: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:55:41.71 -13:25:12.0: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6705 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:38:44.98 -22:17:53.9: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:24:44.50 -18:03:53.4: 15.07 +/- 0.29 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:44.50 -18:03:53.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6265 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:23:42.01 -17:10:02.2: 15.04 +/- 0.27 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:42.01 -17:10:02.2: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5964 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:24:16.20 -14:38:23.2: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:38:44.98 -22:17:53.9: 14.72 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:38:44.98 -22:17:53.9: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5505 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:24:16.20 -14:38:23.2: 14.61 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:16.20 -14:38:23.2: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4439 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:31:00.63 -13:59:17.1: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:29:02.49 -20:40:48.3: 15.03 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:27:52.14 -13:57:58.2: 14.87 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:30:54.80 -22:06:09.2: 14.66 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:23:57.37 -22:18:56.0: 14.33 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:23:34.73 -16:03:08.2: 14.95 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:31:00.63 -13:59:17.1: 14.82 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:00.63 -13:59:17.1: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6243 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:29:02.49 -20:40:48.3: 14.77 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:02.49 -20:40:48.3: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6586 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:30:54.80 -22:06:09.2: 14.47 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:27:52.14 -13:57:58.2: 14.61 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:54.80 -22:06:09.2: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4541 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:52.14 -13:57:58.2: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6071 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:23:57.37 -22:18:56.0: 14.42 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:57.37 -22:18:56.0: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4712 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:23:34.73 -16:03:08.2: 14.76 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:21:21.08 -18:10:23.1: 14.73 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:34.73 -16:03:08.2: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6674 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:23:13.25 -22:00:53.1: 14.56 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:33:27.67 -17:24:01.1: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:21:21.08 -18:10:23.1: 14.72 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:23:13.25 -22:00:53.1: 14.49 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:21.08 -18:10:23.1: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6416 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:13.25 -22:00:53.1: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3799 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:32:48.31 -13:04:10.6: 14.90 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:33:27.67 -17:24:01.1: 14.91 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:33:27.67 -17:24:01.1: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6880 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:27:25.16 -21:04:07.6: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:20:11.43 -21:17:41.2: 14.85 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:23:43.66 -18:48:59.4: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:28:32.16 -21:51:50.2: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:25:32.12 -22:18:37.3: 14.77 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:32:48.31 -13:04:10.6: 14.48 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:48.31 -13:04:10.6: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6061 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:21:28.01 -18:40:15.8: 14.70 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:27:25.16 -21:04:07.6: 14.90 +/- 0.26 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:25.16 -21:04:07.6: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7244 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:20:11.43 -21:17:41.2: 14.66 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:20:11.43 -21:17:41.2: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5448 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:23:43.66 -18:48:59.4: 15.17 +/- 0.32 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:43.66 -18:48:59.4: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6439 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:28:32.16 -21:51:50.2: 15.06 +/- 0.31 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.17 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:32.16 -21:51:50.2: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6708 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:25:32.12 -22:18:37.3: 15.00 +/- 0.31 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.17 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:32.12 -22:18:37.3: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6954 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:21:28.01 -18:40:15.8: 14.57 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:28.01 -18:40:15.8: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6718 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31107.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31595.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30832_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 30832_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.45 00:53:05.58 -22:28:38.4 4737 5926 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.46 00:53:05.48 -22:28:40.4 4734 5932 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30836_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 30836_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.31 01:20:18.53 -22:41:13.5 0917 5980 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.19 01:20:18.69 -22:41:13.6 0913 5985 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30837_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 30837_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.28 01:12:45.93 -14:19:20.7 2070 0918 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.31 01:12:45.92 -14:19:22.3 2067 0923 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30842_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 30842_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 13.86 00:35:23.93 -15:20:38.6 7498 1767 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.02 00:35:23.84 -15:20:36.0 7494 1772 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30854_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 30854_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 8.80 01:00:27.91 -20:05:55.6 3754 4455 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 01:00:27.96 -20:05:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31107_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 Preparing report for the candidate 31107_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31583_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31583_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=2.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 13.97 00:22:55.20 -20:38:52.9 9062 5110 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 13.98 00:22:55.33 -20:38:55.1 9058 5115 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31595_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 Preparing report for the candidate 31595_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31679_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31679_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=1.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=1.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.31 01:20:03.65 -13:03:13.7 0994 0121 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.46 01:20:03.68 -13:03:13.2 0991 0126 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31682_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31682_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.22 00:28:38.25 -22:27:00.7 8162 6133 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.36 00:28:38.20 -22:27:01.0 8158 6138 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31706_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31706_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.24 00:43:42.19 -19:45:39.5 6138 4353 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.40 00:43:42.32 -19:45:39.4 6134 4359 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31743_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31743_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.27 00:22:21.29 -14:32:51.2 9460 1416 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.30 00:22:21.31 -14:32:50.9 9456 1422 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31751_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31751_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.33 00:21:39.73 -21:22:14.6 9206 5566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.39 00:21:39.53 -21:22:11.0 9203 5571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31772_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31772_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.32 00:33:10.84 -19:59:03.3 7625 4586 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.63 00:33:10.91 -19:58:59.8 7621 4591 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31776_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31776_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.39 00:34:31.77 -22:31:41.6 7329 6113 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.73 00:34:31.78 -22:31:41.6 7325 6118 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31810_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31810_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.44 00:46:47.03 -22:46:52.9 5607 6154 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.59 00:46:47.08 -22:46:55.4 5604 6160 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31813_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31813_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.56 01:24:31.56 -21:45:11.4 0320 5413 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.57 01:24:31.56 -21:45:12.7 0316 5418 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31817_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31817_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.42 00:33:04.04 -21:26:56.6 7579 5473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.61 00:33:03.96 -21:26:55.6 7576 5479 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31818_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31818_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.37 00:22:44.16 -19:36:16.2 9141 4479 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.53 00:22:44.14 -19:36:14.8 9138 4484 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31820_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31820_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.39 00:31:22.52 -19:57:08.2 7884 4587 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.45 00:31:22.33 -19:57:08.8 7880 4592 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31825_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31825_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.41 00:31:35.30 -17:53:23.2 7943 3340 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.56 00:31:35.28 -17:53:24.2 7939 3345 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31828_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31828_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.47 00:58:55.24 -21:19:14.0 3950 5194 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.69 00:58:55.31 -21:19:14.6 3946 5200 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31842_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31842_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.43 00:36:50.20 -21:22:03.2 7050 5385 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.60 00:36:50.30 -21:22:04.0 7047 5390 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31850_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31850_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.54 01:20:20.06 -17:40:06.5 0938 2928 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.84 01:20:19.97 -17:40:06.4 0935 2934 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31854_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31854_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.52 00:58:47.26 -14:41:48.8 4112 1207 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.64 00:58:47.26 -14:41:48.2 4108 1212 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31856_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31856_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=1.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.43 00:32:41.74 -21:45:20.2 7619 5663 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.53 00:32:41.85 -21:45:18.3 7615 5669 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31866_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31866_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.56 01:14:30.54 -16:52:00.8 1792 2454 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.57 01:14:30.63 -16:52:00.3 1788 2459 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31887_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31887_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.43 00:22:41.52 -21:51:47.0 9034 5852 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.34 00:22:41.51 -21:51:46.5 9030 5857 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31893_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31893_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.38 00:22:28.00 -20:17:39.6 9145 4901 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.35 00:22:28.05 -20:17:39.1 9141 4906 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31894_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31894_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.43 00:23:37.54 -22:34:59.0 8865 6279 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.45 00:23:37.64 -22:34:58.7 8861 6284 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31896_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31896_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.48 00:21:20.83 -22:02:39.5 9216 5981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.55 00:21:20.90 -22:02:38.2 9213 5986 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31907_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31907_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.47 00:25:29.95 -14:00:01.1 9019 1049 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.47 00:25:30.12 -13:59:59.9 9015 1055 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31909_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31909_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.43 00:31:13.16 -22:39:43.4 7789 6231 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.44 00:31:13.02 -22:39:43.4 7785 6236 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31910_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31910_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.49 00:25:11.52 -22:03:57.2 8668 5942 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.48 00:25:11.43 -22:03:54.9 8664 5947 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31922_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31922_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.50 00:24:32.11 -19:20:35.3 8894 4298 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.64 00:24:31.97 -19:20:35.4 8891 4303 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31933_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31933_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.51 00:43:28.33 -18:03:25.5 6228 3331 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.53 00:43:28.21 -18:03:25.5 6225 3336 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31936_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31936_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.54 00:49:21.03 -19:06:33.4 5357 3919 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.45 00:49:21.05 -19:06:33.7 5353 3924 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31950_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31950_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.54 00:35:56.17 -19:12:10.1 7263 4087 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.72 00:35:56.26 -19:12:07.7 7260 4092 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31962_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31962_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.62 00:55:41.72 -13:25:11.6 4593 0452 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.75 00:55:41.70 -13:25:12.4 4590 0458 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31967_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31967_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.58 00:24:44.48 -18:03:53.3 8927 3522 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.72 00:24:44.51 -18:03:53.6 8924 3527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31974_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31974_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.52 00:23:42.12 -17:10:01.7 9124 2991 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.71 00:23:41.90 -17:10:02.6 9121 2996 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31979_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31979_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.56 00:38:44.93 -22:17:54.9 6746 5930 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.54 00:38:45.04 -22:17:52.9 6742 5935 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31989_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31989_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.51 00:24:16.18 -14:38:23.8 9170 1452 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.40 00:24:16.22 -14:38:22.6 9166 1457 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31997_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31997_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.59 00:31:00.74 -13:59:16.8 8202 0987 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.68 00:31:00.52 -13:59:17.4 8198 0992 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31999_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 31999_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.62 00:29:02.46 -20:40:48.9 8184 5053 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.74 00:29:02.51 -20:40:47.7 8181 5058 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32001_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 32001_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.56 00:27:52.03 -13:57:57.8 8669 1004 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.66 00:27:52.25 -13:57:58.5 8665 1010 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32002_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 32002_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.54 00:30:54.78 -22:06:09.2 7856 5894 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.39 00:30:54.83 -22:06:09.2 7852 5900 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32009_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 32009_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.52 00:23:57.48 -22:18:54.5 8831 6110 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.44 00:23:57.26 -22:18:57.5 8828 6116 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32010_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 32010_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.56 00:23:34.67 -16:03:08.2 9199 2317 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.87 00:23:34.80 -16:03:08.3 9195 2322 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32013_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 32013_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.47 00:23:13.15 -22:00:52.5 8951 5937 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.34 00:23:13.34 -22:00:53.6 8947 5943 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32014_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 32014_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.61 00:21:21.05 -18:10:22.1 9416 3629 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.70 00:21:21.11 -18:10:24.0 9412 3634 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32023_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 32023_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.66 00:33:27.72 -17:24:01.6 7693 3026 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.74 00:33:27.62 -17:24:00.7 7690 3031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32026_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 32026_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.60 00:32:48.37 -13:04:11.4 7977 0412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.61 00:32:48.25 -13:04:09.9 7974 0417 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32047_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 32047_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.61 00:27:25.22 -21:04:07.8 8398 5308 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.98 00:27:25.10 -21:04:07.4 8394 5313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32055_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 32055_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.53 00:20:11.45 -21:17:40.1 9421 5540 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.56 00:20:11.41 -21:17:42.3 9417 5546 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32056_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 32056_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.62 00:23:43.64 -18:48:59.5 9037 3989 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.68 00:23:43.69 -18:48:59.3 9034 3994 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32057_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 32057_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.64 00:28:32.18 -21:51:50.5 8203 5777 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.71 00:28:32.14 -21:51:49.9 8199 5783 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32061_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 32061_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.63 00:25:32.14 -22:18:37.0 8607 6087 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.82 00:25:32.10 -22:18:37.6 8604 6092 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32062_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 32062_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.22345 2461349.72345 14.62 00:21:27.97 -18:40:16.2 9373 3929 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-21-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 14.76 00:21:28.04 -18:40:15.4 9370 3935 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23365_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 23365_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.22402 2461349.72402 13.90 00:28:40.01 -20:27:55.5 8244 4933 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_232351_TTUQ1b1x1_1538695_J2lYj1qc/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.4") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 01:00:27.96 -20:05:56.0 01:08:55.67 -14:29:12.1 00:24:35.71 -17:49:21.6 ########### Completed Cet-10-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 01:00:27.96 -20:05:56.0 01:08:55.67 -14:29:12.1 00:24:35.71 -17:49:21.6 ################################################################################### 01:00:27.96 -20:05:56.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 01:08:55.67 -14:29:12.1 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:24:35.71 -17:49:21.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.72345306 -observatory V36 14:34:03.89 -15:16:27.9 Mercury (6.3mag) 13:23:20.53 -12:52:58.1 Venus (-4.5mag) 09:33:12.50 +16:18:20.9 Mars (0.8mag) 09:47:55.00 +14:02:18.2 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:36:00.61 +00:58:17.6 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:08:44.30 +20:49:22.0 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:08:11.92 -00:39:06.5 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:32.55 -23:41:14.2 Pluto (14.5mag) 11:37:39.57 -00:31:09.0 Moon (-9.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Nov 4 23:25 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.72345306: 09:47:48.55 +14:02:56.1 Io (6.0mag) 09:48:04.27 +14:01:24.4 Europa (6.1mag) 09:47:43.18 +14:03:27.8 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:48:23.79 +13:59:35.5 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:49:29.76 +14:10:34.2 Himalia (15.5mag) 09:47:53.34 +14:02:27.4 Thebe (16.3mag) 09:47:47.41 +14:27:23.6 Elara (17.4mag) 09:48:31.41 +13:30:40.7 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 09:44:49.50 +14:34:29.8 Carme (18.7mag) 00:36:12.73 +00:58:01.9 Titan (8.3mag) 00:35:55.13 +00:58:09.7 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:36:33.53 +00:59:18.3 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:35:56.60 +00:57:46.9 Hyperion (14.2mag) 00:34:13.88 +00:46:12.3 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 4 23:26 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.72345306: 04:41:16.40 +16:52:11.0 JWST 18:57:28.89 +04:11:02.9 Chandra 06:32:00.27 +13:06:12.9 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 4 23:26 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.72345306 -observatory V36 03:32:17.33 +19:54:07.8 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:47:10.55 +38:30:58.9 17.8mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:47:15.94 +38:30:46.0 17.8mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:46:34.15 +38:31:06.6 17.8mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:01:24.05 +38:47:21.7 17.7mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:50:07.48 -32:49:17.3 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:45:22.89 -74:01:13.5 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:10:59.44 +35:21:28.6 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 21:43:03.52 +20:29:51.1 17.9mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:35:50.74 +25:20:23.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:08:41.52 +38:47:33.9 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:38:14.20 +40:51:30.6 17.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:42:26.17 -13:30:51.7 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 14:17:16.10 -04:43:39.3 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 20:21:31.30 +51:53:17.2 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 13:09:16.99 +17:14:34.7 17.7mag A/2026 E1 15:56:08.86 -66:28:50.0 14.7mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:35:51.41 -05:23:35.1 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 10:46:51.27 +02:37:14.8 17.5mag P/2026 U1 (Gafton) 23:24:45.51 +13:35:07.0 16.9mag 2P/Encke 23:28:25.40 -25:15:49.9 15.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:42:08.44 +29:35:47.3 16.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:27:16.61 -10:10:53.3 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:10:04.52 -08:59:17.1 15.9mag 65P/Gunn 08:01:33.04 +13:24:26.2 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 20:56:37.56 -24:19:59.1 16.5mag 84P/Giclas 10:41:46.28 +13:13:02.8 17.6mag 93P/Lovas 09:05:42.56 +46:20:03.6 16.8mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:54:29.85 +04:54:22.0 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:30:22.23 +07:38:43.2 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 23:26:14.31 -00:57:06.6 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 19:44:57.84 +14:52:30.3 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 11:15:53.04 -03:25:25.6 16.3mag 169P/NEAT 09:42:18.60 +23:24:58.8 18.0mag 186P/Garradd 03:08:58.28 +02:03:54.1 15.4mag 220P/McNaught 06:22:41.60 +50:04:25.7 15.9mag 260P/McNaught 07:58:17.83 +25:02:38.6 17.5mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Nov 4 23:26 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:58:35.28 +22:20:06.50 ASASSN-26fs 2026-11-2.4 12.31 02:29:41.13 -71:57:55.60 ASASSN-26fr 2026-11-1.22 13.7 21:27:22.43 -18:15:42.10 SN 2026agsu 2026-10-29.85 -1.08 17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92 10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27 21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82 01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9 01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88 00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 4 23:25 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 4 23:25 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:53:40.597 +65:17:02.64 AT 2026afyq 2026-09-27.00 27.37 17:54:09.428 +65:16:55.00 AT 2026afyp 2026-09-27.00 26.33 17:53:48.917 +65:14:08.09 AT 2026afyo 2026-09-27.00 28.45 17:54:06.374 +65:12:07.03 AT 2026afyn 2026-09-27.00 27.53 17:54:12.378 +65:11:36.46 AT 2026afym 2026-09-27.00 27.72 17:54:06.270 +65:11:07.40 AT 2026afyl 2026-09-27.00 25.92 17:53:27.005 +65:10:54.26 AT 2026afyk 2026-09-27.00 27.33 17:54:11.180 +65:09:41.88 AT 2026afyj 2026-09-27.00 26.3 17:53:38.059 +65:08:44.42 AT 2026afyi 2026-09-27.00 27.21 17:54:21.568 +65:08:31.22 AT 2026afyh 2026-09-27.00 24.81 17:54:22.489 +65:08:12.98 AT 2026afyg 2026-09-27.00 27.34 17:54:12.363 +65:07:56.68 AT 2026afyf 2026-09-27.00 25.37 17:53:32.198 +65:12:13.26 AT 2026afye 2026-08-07.00 27.52 17:54:17.450 +65:10:55.80 AT 2026afyd 2026-08-07.00 26.19 17:53:34.001 +65:15:33.76 AT 2026afyc 2026-05-27.00 27.28 17:53:39.791 +65:16:43.84 AT 2026afyb 2026-03-28.00 26.7 01:07:23.505 +32:00:53.10 AT 2026afya 2026-10-11.48 20.5 06:56:31.236 +52:33:55.44 AT 2026afxz 2026-10-06.58 20.74 04:59:34.078 -09:52:21.92 AT 2026afxy 2026-10-12.52 19.8 01:14:09.805 -13:39:55.41 AT 2026afxx 2026-10-06.43 19.69 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 4 23:25 tns_transients_list.txt
JD 2461032.58217: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72345: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.72402: SE_FLAGS=0.