util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.17677 | 2461349.67677 | 8.79 | 01:00:29.74 -20:05:34.6 | 5748 1940 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.17770 | 2461349.67770 | 8.80 | 01:00:29.71 -20:05:35.2 | 5740 1933 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.67677: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.67770: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.1772 2461349.6772 8.79 01:00:29.72 -20:05:34.9
139.82971 -82.66580 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 10.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
2 Pallas -1 -0 1 8.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:00:29.72 -20:05:34.9: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:00:29.72 -20:05:34.9: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.17677 | 2461349.67677 | 12.80 | 01:08:57.14 -14:29:15.7 | 7040 5310 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.17770 | 2461349.67770 | 12.79 | 01:08:57.13 -14:29:15.4 | 7031 5303 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.67677: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.67770: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.1772 2461349.6772 12.79 01:08:57.14 -14:29:15.6
141.69894 -76.71698 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 10.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
166 Rhodope -1 -0 1 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:08:57.14 -14:29:15.6: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:08:57.14 -14:29:15.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=local (lib/catalogs/local_star_catalog -> local copy: Gaia DR2 gaia_source, G < 19.0, built from https://cdn.gea.esac.esa.int/Gaia/gdr2/gaia_source/csv on 2026-11-04) The APASS known-star check of the candidates is disabled (see the note in util/transients/report_transient.sh) WARNING: VizieR is unreachable (no mirror answered the test query) - the online identification of candidates is degraded for this run INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Cet-10-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Cet-10-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing Cet-10-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 627585 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 627585 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits_preview.png'
Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits
renamed 'Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits_preview.png'
Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. Field altitude during imaging: 37.9 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Field altitude during imaging: 37.9 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1164.6233 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 463.0200 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1528.4035 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 490.9937 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1521.7107 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 489.6716 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.31236 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 10.6199998855591 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 11.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-04T22:14:23.1520575' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T04:14:23.1520575' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.176656852 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T04:14:33.0528330' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.176771435 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 13.3306191320237 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9995803308031 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.9019444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 170.900555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.62526700079858 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 53 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20686 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20686 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 10.6199998855591 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 10.6199998855591 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 78.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 897.09 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 11.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 356.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.800464 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/d_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits :) Spent 0.568433 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/d_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 10.7399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 11.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-04T22:15:43.3251106' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T04:15:43.3251106' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.1775847799 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T04:15:53.2267385' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.177699375 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 13.3306191686812 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9995802843236 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.945 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 171.300277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.6237079735977 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 53 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20686 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20686 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 10.7399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 10.7399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 78.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 897.09 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 11.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 356.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.800464 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/d_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits :) Spent 0.606000 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/d_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits
fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461349.67677259 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:41.884 -18:01:52.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:41.884 -18:01:52.15 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0937 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:45.208 -18:01:11.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:45.208 -18:01:11.19 Angular distance between the image centers 0.1050 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:53:41.884 -18:01:52.15 Second-epoch second image center 00:53:45.208 -18:01:11.19 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01740 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oz5kpX81Zx Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sNKocfTEXq Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lDgi8WghqZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sDhDIR7keM Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.879650 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.879650 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=5.9) Read 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg Loaded 4161 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2348 out of 2396 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2396 out of 4144 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=5.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 2.1 pix Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 2.3 pix fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits 2.3 pix fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 15.1 mag. Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.oz5kpX81Zx (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=318, bad_region=1038, passed=4470 Got 4470 stars (including 3173 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3120 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3118 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3645 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3120 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3645 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3645 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 3118 stars left (next iteration limit 3429) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=3118 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.236 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=970 n_q2=588 n_q3=960 n_q4=600 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3118 N_valid=3118 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.234 p95_sep_arcsec=0.698 n_q1=970 n_q2=588 n_q3=960 n_q4=600 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.sNKocfTEXq (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=259, bad_region=948, passed=4144 Got 4144 stars (including 2986 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2932 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3382 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3382 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3382 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 2935 stars left (next iteration limit 3225) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=2935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=910 n_q2=554 n_q3=908 n_q4=563 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2935 N_valid=2935 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.100 bias_dec_arcsec=0.768 median_sep_arcsec=2.964 p95_sep_arcsec=6.851 n_q1=910 n_q2=554 n_q3=908 n_q4=563 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.lDgi8WghqZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=260, bad_region=930, passed=4140 Got 4140 stars (including 3020 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4140 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3391 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3391 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3391 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 2960 stars left (next iteration limit 3251) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2960 robust_rms=7.807 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.760 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.760 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2960 robust_rms=0.574 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.987 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.987 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2960 robust_rms=0.325 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.422 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.422 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2960 robust_rms_before=1.023 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.309 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.325 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.416 worst_region_rms_after=0.422 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.082 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.422 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.416 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.309 arcsec matched=2960 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits N_match=2960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=955 n_q2=524 n_q3=976 n_q4=505 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2960 N_valid=2960 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.559 bias_dec_arcsec=0.530 median_sep_arcsec=0.955 p95_sep_arcsec=1.864 n_q1=955 n_q2=524 n_q3=976 n_q4=505 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.sDhDIR7keM (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=271, bad_region=949, passed=4114 Got 4114 stars (including 2960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4114 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2904 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3355 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3355 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3355 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 2906 stars left (next iteration limit 3194) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2906 robust_rms=7.635 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.055 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.055 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2906 robust_rms=0.549 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.997 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.997 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2906 robust_rms=0.347 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.400 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.400 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2906 robust_rms_before=1.028 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.346 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.347 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.389 worst_region_rms_after=0.400 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.083 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.400 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.389 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.389 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.346 arcsec matched=2906 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits N_match=2906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=932 n_q2=506 n_q3=961 n_q4=507 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2906 N_valid=2906 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.568 bias_dec_arcsec=0.522 median_sep_arcsec=0.959 p95_sep_arcsec=1.809 n_q1=932 n_q2=506 n_q3=961 n_q4=507 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits sigma_overall=0.280 worst_q_ratio=1.228 ref2=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.141 new1=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.115 new2=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.187 reference average sigma_overall=0.2775 worst_q_ratio=1.1845 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017_astrometric_residuals.png (3118 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067_astrometric_residuals.png (2935 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214_astrometric_residuals.png (2960 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215_astrometric_residuals.png (2906 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:58:18.93 -16:02:34.4: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:00:29.72 -20:05:34.9: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:58:18.93 -16:02:34.4: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:00:29.72 -20:05:34.9: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:18.93 -16:02:34.4: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9862 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20132.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20132_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 Preparing report for the candidate 20132_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20799_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 20799_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 11 05.17677 2461349.67677 11.99 00:58:18.93 -16:02:34.6 5466 4391 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.17770 2461349.67770 11.99 00:58:18.93 -16:02:34.3 5458 4384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 01:00:29.72 -20:05:34.9 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:41.884 -18:01:52.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:41.884 -18:01:52.15 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0937 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:45.208 -18:01:11.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:45.208 -18:01:11.19 Angular distance between the image centers 0.1050 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:53:41.884 -18:01:52.15 Second-epoch second image center 00:53:45.208 -18:01:11.19 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01740 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XqNvTrqmc2 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qeDyXwT1uL Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EDuOvwvRzq Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9vSarqssx9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_
JD 2461349.67677: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.67770: SE_FLAGS=0..fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.766400 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.766400 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=4.7) Read 21682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg Loaded 4192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2550 out of 2661 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2661 out of 21682 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=4.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 2.0 pix Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 15.2 mag. Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 15.2 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits 15.2 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.XqNvTrqmc2 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=893, bad_region=4833, passed=24282 Got 24282 stars (including 18732 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24282 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20545 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20545 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20545 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1559 n_q2=934 n_q3=1493 n_q4=894 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4880 N_valid=4880 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.250 p95_sep_arcsec=0.666 n_q1=1559 n_q2=934 n_q3=1493 n_q4=894 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.qeDyXwT1uL (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=669, bad_region=3901, passed=21676 Got 21676 stars (including 17202 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21676 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18628 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18628 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18628 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4868 stars left (next iteration limit 5357) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=4868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=1587 n_q2=945 n_q3=1469 n_q4=867 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4868 N_valid=4868 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.091 bias_dec_arcsec=0.930 median_sep_arcsec=2.866 p95_sep_arcsec=6.758 n_q1=1587 n_q2=945 n_q3=1469 n_q4=867 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.EDuOvwvRzq (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=777, bad_region=4270, passed=22113 Got 22113 stars (including 17213 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22113 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4818 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18836 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18836 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18836 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4818 stars left (next iteration limit 5299) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4818 robust_rms=7.446 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.980 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.980 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4818 robust_rms=0.588 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.984 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.984 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4818 robust_rms=0.355 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.458 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.458 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4818 robust_rms_before=1.005 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.330 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.355 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.428 worst_region_rms_after=0.458 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.133 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.458 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.428 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.428 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.330 arcsec matched=4818 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits N_match=4818 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1506 n_q2=846 n_q3=1566 n_q4=900 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4818 N_valid=4818 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.525 bias_dec_arcsec=0.539 median_sep_arcsec=0.941 p95_sep_arcsec=1.761 n_q1=1506 n_q2=846 n_q3=1566 n_q4=900 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.9vSarqssx9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=802, bad_region=4326, passed=22421 Got 22421 stars (including 17465 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22421 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4808 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19100 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19100 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19100 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4809 stars left (next iteration limit 5288) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=7.421 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.375 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.375 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=0.572 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.004 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.004 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=0.378 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.439 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.439 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4809 robust_rms_before=1.014 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.375 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.378 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.440 worst_region_rms_after=0.439 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.142 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.439 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.440 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.440 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.375 arcsec matched=4809 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits N_match=4809 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1509 n_q2=854 n_q3=1552 n_q4=894 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4809 N_valid=4809 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.533 bias_dec_arcsec=0.530 median_sep_arcsec=0.942 p95_sep_arcsec=1.760 n_q1=1509 n_q2=854 n_q3=1552 n_q4=894 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:34:28.30 -16:10:09.0: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:08:57.14 -14:29:15.6: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:37:01.65 -21:53:54.7: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:47:58.73 -20:43:47.8: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:35:45.82 -21:13:34.9: 15.00 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:38:03.78 -18:51:50.5: 15.02 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:00:52.39 -21:58:40.2: 15.04 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:49:56.29 -19:25:59.1: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:58:55.28 -21:19:13.8: 14.93 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:12:51.17 -20:50:22.5: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:08:57.14 -14:29:15.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:37:01.65 -21:53:54.7: 14.85 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:00:52.39 -21:58:40.2: 14.44 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:38:03.78 -18:51:50.5: 14.98 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:58:55.28 -21:19:13.8: 14.88 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:34:28.30 -16:10:09.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:49:56.29 -19:25:59.1: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:37:01.65 -21:53:54.7: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3809 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:35:45.82 -21:13:34.9: 15.18 +/- 0.30 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:47:58.73 -20:43:47.8: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:00:52.39 -21:58:40.2: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5044 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:38:03.78 -18:51:50.5: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5869 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:34:28.30 -16:10:09.0: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5896 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:55.28 -21:19:13.8: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5971 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:49:56.29 -19:25:59.1: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3053 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.17 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:45.82 -21:13:34.9: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.4621 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:47:58.73 -20:43:47.8: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1594 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:12:51.17 -20:50:22.5: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:12:51.17 -20:50:22.5: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6840 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:56:29.28 -20:34:44.4: 15.19 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:39:08.56 -21:50:59.2: 15.05 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:49:21.05 -19:06:33.2: 14.68 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:50:14.51 -19:10:38.8: 14.54 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:35:53.85 -18:13:23.1: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:39:08.56 -21:50:59.2: 14.93 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:39:08.56 -21:50:59.2: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7580 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:50:14.51 -19:10:38.8: 14.80 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:56:29.28 -20:34:44.4: 15.00 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:50:14.51 -19:10:38.8: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6017 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:56:29.28 -20:34:44.4: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7363 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:35:53.85 -18:13:23.1: 15.01 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:49:21.05 -19:06:33.2: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:53.85 -18:13:23.1: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6839 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:49:21.05 -19:06:33.2: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6782 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32033.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30740_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 30740_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 11 05.17677 2461349.67677 14.51 01:00:52.49 -21:58:40.6 5786 0795 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.17770 2461349.67770 14.50 01:00:52.30 -21:58:39.7 5778 0788 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30741_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 30741_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.67677: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.67770: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.17677 2461349.67677 14.15 00:47:58.72 -20:43:47.8 3972 1564 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.17770 2461349.67770 14.17 00:47:58.74 -20:43:47.8 3964 1557 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30744_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 30744_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.67677: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.67770: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.17677 2461349.67677 13.34 00:49:56.30 -19:25:59.1 4249 2350 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.17770 2461349.67770 13.28 00:49:56.28 -19:25:59.0 4241 2343 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30783_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 30783_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.67677: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.67770: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.17770 2461349.67770 8.80 01:00:29.70 -20:05:35.1 5740 1933 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 01:00:29.71 -20:05:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32033_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 Preparing report for the candidate 32033_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34506_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 34506_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.67677: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.67770: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.17677 2461349.67677 14.39 00:37:01.56 -21:53:54.5 2428 0833 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.17770 2461349.67770 14.38 00:37:01.74 -21:53:54.9 2421 0826 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34577_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 34577_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.67677: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.67770: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.17677 2461349.67677 14.42 00:35:45.87 -21:13:34.3 2243 1238 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.17770 2461349.67770 14.50 00:35:45.77 -21:13:35.4 2234 1231 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34660_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 34660_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.67677: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.67770: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.17677 2461349.67677 14.61 00:58:55.27 -21:19:14.9 5516 1199 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.17770 2461349.67770 14.56 00:58:55.28 -21:19:12.6 5508 1192 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34741_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 34741_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.67677: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.67770: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.17677 2461349.67677 14.54 00:38:03.63 -18:51:50.4 2547 2679 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.17770 2461349.67770 14.67 00:38:03.93 -18:51:50.6 2540 2671 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34768_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 34768_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.67677: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.67770: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.17677 2461349.67677 14.49 00:34:28.28 -16:10:08.5 1996 4303 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.17770 2461349.67770 14.75 00:34:28.31 -16:10:09.4 1988 4296 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34840_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 34840_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.67677: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.67770: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.17677 2461349.67677 14.61 01:12:51.17 -20:50:22.9 7496 1442 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.17770 2461349.67770 14.81 01:12:51.17 -20:50:22.0 7488 1435 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34862_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 34862_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.67677: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.67770: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.17677 2461349.67677 14.67 00:49:21.07 -19:06:31.9 4165 2545 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.17770 2461349.67770 14.69 00:49:21.03 -19:06:34.5 4157 2538 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34925_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 34925_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.67677: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.67770: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.17677 2461349.67677 14.66 00:39:08.55 -21:50:58.5 2727 0869 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.17770 2461349.67770 15.01 00:39:08.57 -21:50:59.8 2720 0862 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34933_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 34933_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.67677: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.67770: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.17677 2461349.67677 14.60 00:50:14.47 -19:10:38.7 4292 2504 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.17770 2461349.67770 14.60 00:50:14.56 -19:10:38.9 4284 2497 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34980_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 34980_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.67677: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.67770: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.17677 2461349.67677 14.70 00:56:29.36 -20:34:45.0 5176 1652 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.17770 2461349.67770 14.79 00:56:29.19 -20:34:43.8 5168 1646 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35024_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 35024_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.67677: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.67770: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.17677 2461349.67677 14.66 00:35:53.85 -18:13:22.9 2228 3061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-14-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.17770 2461349.67770 14.71 00:35:53.86 -18:13:23.4 2220 3054 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_222155_TTUQ2b1x1_2025917_7iMjDxzf/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-15-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 01:00:29.72 -20:05:34.9 01:08:57.14 -14:29:15.6 ########### Completed Cet-10-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 01:00:29.72 -20:05:34.9 01:08:57.14 -14:29:15.6 ################################################################################### 01:00:29.72 -20:05:34.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 01:08:57.14 -14:29:15.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.67677259 -observatory V36 14:34:16.71 -15:18:30.9 Mercury (6.4mag) 13:23:22.72 -12:53:59.9 Venus (-4.5mag) 09:33:06.93 +16:18:43.4 Mars (0.8mag) 09:47:53.75 +14:02:23.9 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:36:01.24 +00:58:21.0 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:08:44.75 +20:49:23.1 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:08:12.13 -00:39:05.3 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:32.44 -23:41:14.7 Pluto (14.5mag) 11:34:37.73 -00:14:10.2 Moon (-9.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Nov 4 22:27 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.67677259: 09:47:47.58 +14:03:00.2 Io (6.0mag) 09:48:02.49 +14:01:32.9 Europa (6.1mag) 09:47:42.45 +14:03:30.4 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:48:22.73 +13:59:40.0 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:49:28.32 +14:10:41.7 Himalia (15.5mag) 09:47:53.58 +14:02:24.7 Thebe (16.3mag) 09:47:46.00 +14:27:29.1 Elara (17.4mag) 09:48:30.40 +13:30:45.2 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 09:44:48.43 +14:34:35.0 Carme (18.7mag) 00:36:13.35 +00:58:04.9 Titan (8.3mag) 00:35:55.54 +00:58:13.9 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:36:34.10 +00:59:21.2 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:35:57.02 +00:57:50.6 Hyperion (14.2mag) 00:34:14.50 +00:46:15.7 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 4 22:27 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.67677259: 04:41:16.21 +16:52:05.0 JWST 18:49:39.19 +08:07:11.8 Chandra 06:13:05.02 +22:47:50.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 4 22:27 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.67677259 -observatory V36 03:32:19.53 +19:54:11.8 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:47:09.75 +38:30:46.3 17.8mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:47:15.13 +38:30:33.4 17.8mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:46:33.35 +38:30:53.9 17.8mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:01:24.98 +38:47:51.4 17.7mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:50:04.30 -32:49:22.9 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:45:22.80 -74:01:02.8 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:11:00.22 +35:21:23.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 21:43:04.05 +20:30:12.7 17.9mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:35:50.56 +25:20:23.6 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:08:41.36 +38:47:09.1 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:38:12.26 +40:51:31.9 17.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:42:27.18 -13:30:55.7 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 14:17:12.98 -04:43:26.4 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 20:21:20.99 +51:55:10.8 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 13:09:14.34 +17:14:10.5 17.7mag A/2026 E1 15:56:15.53 -66:27:20.5 14.7mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:35:48.63 -05:23:33.2 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 10:46:47.63 +02:37:39.3 17.5mag P/2026 U1 (Gafton) 23:24:51.98 +13:35:51.3 16.9mag 2P/Encke 23:28:21.89 -25:16:38.0 15.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:42:05.61 +29:37:18.6 16.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:27:14.87 -10:10:39.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:10:05.46 -08:59:20.6 15.9mag 65P/Gunn 08:01:31.00 +13:24:42.4 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 20:56:33.26 -24:20:17.2 16.5mag 84P/Giclas 10:41:42.94 +13:13:26.8 17.6mag 93P/Lovas 09:05:33.45 +46:19:26.7 16.8mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:54:24.65 +04:55:25.9 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:30:16.80 +07:39:20.3 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 23:26:14.61 -00:57:02.5 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 19:45:03.73 +14:51:49.2 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 11:15:47.26 -03:24:56.6 16.3mag 169P/NEAT 09:42:17.47 +23:25:06.0 18.0mag 186P/Garradd 03:09:01.07 +02:04:05.0 15.4mag 220P/McNaught 06:22:41.79 +50:03:56.1 15.9mag 260P/McNaught 07:58:15.06 +25:02:40.9 17.5mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Nov 4 22:27 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:58:35.28 +22:20:06.50 ASASSN-26fs 2026-11-2.4 12.31 02:29:41.13 -71:57:55.60 ASASSN-26fr 2026-11-1.22 13.7 21:27:22.43 -18:15:42.10 SN 2026agsu 2026-10-29.85 -1.08 17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92 10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27 21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82 01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9 01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88 00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 4 22:27 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 4 22:27 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:54:06.374 +65:12:07.03 AT 2026afyn 2026-09-27.00 27.53 17:54:12.378 +65:11:36.46 AT 2026afym 2026-09-27.00 27.72 17:54:06.270 +65:11:07.40 AT 2026afyl 2026-09-27.00 25.92 17:53:27.005 +65:10:54.26 AT 2026afyk 2026-09-27.00 27.33 17:54:11.180 +65:09:41.88 AT 2026afyj 2026-09-27.00 26.3 17:53:38.059 +65:08:44.42 AT 2026afyi 2026-09-27.00 27.21 17:54:21.568 +65:08:31.22 AT 2026afyh 2026-09-27.00 24.81 17:54:22.489 +65:08:12.98 AT 2026afyg 2026-09-27.00 27.34 17:54:12.363 +65:07:56.68 AT 2026afyf 2026-09-27.00 25.37 17:53:32.198 +65:12:13.26 AT 2026afye 2026-08-07.00 27.52 17:54:17.450 +65:10:55.80 AT 2026afyd 2026-08-07.00 26.19 17:53:34.001 +65:15:33.76 AT 2026afyc 2026-05-27.00 27.28 17:53:39.791 +65:16:43.84 AT 2026afyb 2026-03-28.00 26.7 01:07:23.505 +32:00:53.10 AT 2026afya 2026-10-11.48 20.5 06:56:31.236 +52:33:55.44 AT 2026afxz 2026-10-06.58 20.74 04:59:34.078 -09:52:21.92 AT 2026afxy 2026-10-12.52 19.8 01:14:09.805 -13:39:55.41 AT 2026afxx 2026-10-06.43 19.69 03:41:26.334 -01:30:43.79 AT 2026afxw 2026-10-19.42 20.5509 08:32:00.397 +26:40:21.34 AT 2026afxv 2026-10-16.45 19.9231 10:01:37.234 +18:45:25.97 AT 2026afxu 2026-10-20.53 19.8573 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 4 22:27 tns_transients_list.txt
JD 2461349.67677: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.67770: SE_FLAGS=0.