This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2643 2461348.7643 10.49 05:19:24.11 +21:48:41.2
182.79248 -8.83265 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 2 -0 2 10.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:24.11 +21:48:41.2: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:24.11 +21:48:41.2: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 04.2643* 05 19 24.11 +21 48 41.2 10.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461348.7643,10.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261104.2643 10.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2643 2461348.7643 11.43 05:04:31.23 +26:06:59.0
177.24799 -9.13168 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 10.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales 0 1 1 11.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:04:31.23 +26:06:59.0: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:04:31.23 +26:06:59.0: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 04.2643* 05 04 31.23 +26 06 59.0 11.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461348.7643,11.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261104.2643 11.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2643 2461348.7643 12.36 06:06:51.73 +26:03:23.4
184.85871 2.62307 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia 0 -0 1 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:06:51.73 +26:03:23.4: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:06:51.73 +26:03:23.4: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461348.7643,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261104.2643 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2643 2461348.7643 13.30 04:59:20.94 +23:55:16.2
178.33058 -11.38037 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 10.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.418 Alemannia -1 -0 1 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 04:59:20.94 +23:55:16.2: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 04:59:20.94 +23:55:16.2: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 04.2643* 04 59 20.94 +23 55 16.2 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461348.7643,13.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261104.2643 13.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461348.76592957 04.11.2026 06:22:46.315 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 18
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 21817
Objects passed selection criteria: 21804
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 19812.2
Average stars matched: 19413.2 (97.9861 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249016 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Nov 4 00:53:03 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461348.76592957 04.11.2026 06:22:46.315 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 41
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 200 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 158946
Objects passed selection criteria: 158559
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 135114
Average stars matched: 130073 (96.2689 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 616256 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Nov 4 00:58:04 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461348.76262882
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:23.120 +21:59:37.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:23.120 +21:59:37.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0149 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.356 +22:00:17.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:21.356 +22:00:17.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0088 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:23.120 +21:59:37.17
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:21.356 +22:00:17.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01307 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3V25VBNRRz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rngYqS5S06
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6jeHooYjs0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eSUsfFjPfk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
6.2 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.3V25VBNRRz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4713 N_valid=4713 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.260 p95_sep_arcsec=1.482 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.rngYqS5S06 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4715 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4715 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=906 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4715 N_valid=4715 bias_ra_arcsec=0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.008 median_sep_arcsec=0.353 p95_sep_arcsec=1.559 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=906 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.6jeHooYjs0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=995, bad_region=0, passed=14339
Got 14339 stars (including 13343 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14339 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4731 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.99"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.00"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.03"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.09"
Excluding outliers - 4727 stars left (next iteration limit 5199)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=11.805 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.840 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.840 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=0.862 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.537 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.537 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=0.826 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.495 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.495 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4727 robust_rms_before=1.328 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.992 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.862 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.727 worst_region_rms_after=1.537 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.279 outer_annulus_rms_after=1.537
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.sip_refit.9DuQik/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.sip_refit.9DuQik/candidate.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:23.143 +21:59:36.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 14339 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.sip_refit.9DuQik/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_1277115.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.sip_refit.9DuQik/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.3Tt4VO' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_1277115.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 1.328 -> 0.862 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 4.3 arcsec, 4727 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4443 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4443 pairs (4727 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4443 robust_rms=11.259 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.597 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.597 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4443 robust_rms=0.822 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.468 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.468 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4443 robust_rms=0.790 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.407 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.407 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4443 robust_rms_before=0.823 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.823 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.822 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.467 worst_region_rms_after=1.468 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.467 outer_annulus_rms_after=1.468
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 1.468 vs 1.467 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4443 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.94"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4443 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits N_match=4443 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.765 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.763 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.995 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.703 n_q1=859 n_q2=1341 n_q3=750 n_q4=1493 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4443 N_valid=4443 bias_ra_arcsec=0.014 bias_dec_arcsec=0.016 median_sep_arcsec=0.607 p95_sep_arcsec=2.466 n_q1=859 n_q2=1341 n_q3=750 n_q4=1493 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.eSUsfFjPfk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1818, bad_region=1, passed=21522
Got 21522 stars (including 19683 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21522 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4786 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4786 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4722 stars left (next iteration limit 5190)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=11.558 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.552 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.552 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=0.480 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.767 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.767 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=0.309 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.431 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.431 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4722 robust_rms_before=0.982 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.391 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.309 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.539 worst_region_rms_after=0.431 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.936 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.431
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.sip_refit.jGOTUZ/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.sip_refit.jGOTUZ/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.355 +22:00:16.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 21522 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.sip_refit.jGOTUZ/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_1277229.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.sip_refit.jGOTUZ/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.M5PkqS' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_1277229.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.982 -> 0.309 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4722 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4512 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4512 pairs (4722 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4512 robust_rms=11.045 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.000 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.000 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4512 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.730 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.730 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4512 robust_rms=0.302 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.421 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.421 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4512 robust_rms_before=0.303 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.303 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.302 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.425 worst_region_rms_after=0.421 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.425 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.421
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.sip_refit.WpOINP/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.sip_refit.WpOINP/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.355 +22:00:16.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 21522 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.sip_refit.WpOINP/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_1277845.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.sip_refit.WpOINP/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.HL39Mf' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_1277845.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.303 -> 0.302 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4512 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4512 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits N_match=4512 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=843 n_q2=1481 n_q3=661 n_q4=1527 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4512 N_valid=4512 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.256 p95_sep_arcsec=0.870 n_q1=843 n_q2=1481 n_q3=661 n_q4=1527 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.488 worst_q_ratio=1.234
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits sigma_overall=0.765 worst_q_ratio=1.301
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.079
reference average sigma_overall=0.4325 worst_q_ratio=1.2345
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4715 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058_astrometric_residuals.png (4443 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.57 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059_astrometric_residuals.png (4512 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:04:31.23 +26:06:59.0: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:06:51.73 +26:03:23.4: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:46:53.03 +24:12:12.2: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:00:17.05 +24:49:35.0: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:24.11 +21:48:41.2: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:06:51.73 +26:03:23.4: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:46:53.03 +24:12:12.2: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:04:31.23 +26:06:59.0: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:00:17.05 +24:49:35.0: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:24.11 +21:48:41.2: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:53.03 +24:12:12.2: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3091 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:04:31.23 +26:06:59.0: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=11.4259 delta=3.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:17.05 +24:49:35.0: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4201 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:19:24.11 +21:48:41.2: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.4999 delta=3.38 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30691.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30726.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30851.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 34s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30691_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 30691_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30720_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 30720_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:16.90 +21:56:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30726_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 30726_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30773_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 30773_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:26.62 +22:20:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30799_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 30799_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:57.45 +21:52:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30826_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 30826_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30832_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 30832_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30851_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 30851_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 38s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:19:24.11 +21:48:41.2
05:04:31.23 +26:06:59.0
06:06:51.73 +26:03:23.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:23.143 +21:59:36.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:23.143 +21:59:36.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0150 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.355 +22:00:16.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:21.355 +22:00:16.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0086 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:23.143 +21:59:36.32
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:21.355 +22:00:16.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01313 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E8O49lohmH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e6PZv0VUxa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wFA6FiwigJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits &> /tmp/tmp.shxy6P2yhA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 23 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
5.2 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.E8O49lohmH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4716 N_valid=4716 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.250 p95_sep_arcsec=1.336 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.e6PZv0VUxa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4710 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4710 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=977 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4710 N_valid=4710 bias_ra_arcsec=0.006 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.337 p95_sep_arcsec=1.469 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=977 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wFA6FiwigJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=5, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=59, blended=11112, bad_region=48, passed=63727
Got 63727 stars (including 52554 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63727 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4772 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.02"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.97"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4703 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.98"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4703 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.06"
Excluding outliers - 4703 stars left (next iteration limit 5175)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4703 robust_rms=13.121 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.705 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.705 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4703 robust_rms=0.862 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.528 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.528 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4703 robust_rms=0.826 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.516 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.516 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4703 robust_rms_before=0.855 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=1.003 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.862 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.530 worst_region_rms_after=1.528 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.530 outer_annulus_rms_after=1.528
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 1.530 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits worst_region_rms_kept=1.530 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.855 arcsec matched=4703
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits N_match=4703 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.912 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.862 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.842 n_q1=941 n_q2=1353 n_q3=851 n_q4=1558 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.405
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4703 N_valid=4703 bias_ra_arcsec=0.007 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.016 median_sep_arcsec=0.651 p95_sep_arcsec=5.117 n_q1=941 n_q2=1353 n_q3=851 n_q4=1558 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.shxy6P2yhA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=40, blended=15880, bad_region=46, passed=150163
Got 150163 stars (including 133988 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 150163 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4766 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4766 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4715 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4715 robust_rms=12.470 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.622 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.622 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4715 robust_rms=0.463 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.806 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.806 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4715 robust_rms=0.298 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.431 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.431 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4715 robust_rms_before=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.298 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.433 worst_region_rms_after=0.431 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.433 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.431
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.433 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.433 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.297 arcsec matched=4715
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits N_match=4715 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=903 n_q2=1551 n_q3=711 n_q4=1550 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4715 N_valid=4715 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.007 median_sep_arcsec=0.256 p95_sep_arcsec=1.583 n_q1=903 n_q2=1551 n_q3=711 n_q4=1550 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003324_TTUQ1b1x1_432748_6LjNV97r/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:06:33.63 +25:04:55.7: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:22:18.79 +20:16:04.0: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:08:54.77 +21:51:12.3: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:44:58.63 +21:16:42.3: 13.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:03:07.03 +23:34:57.1: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:06:08.79 +25:23:50.5: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:00:00.67 +17:07:42.4: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:12:53.28 +26:10:19.8: 14.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:14.05 +20:19:25.7: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:02:33.31 +22:40:43.1: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:03:07.03 +23:34:57.1: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:06:33.63 +25:04:55.7: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:08:54.77 +21:51:12.3: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:22:18.79 +20:16:04.0: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:44:58.63 +21:16:42.3: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:07.03 +23:34:57.1: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7161 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:33.63 +25:04:55.7: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4690 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:22:18.79 +20:16:04.0: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2984 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:54.77 +21:51:12.3: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1214 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:58.63 +21:16:42.3: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2366 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:12:53.28 +26:10:19.8: 14.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:00:00.67 +17:07:42.4: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:53.28 +26:10:19.8: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2983 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:00:00.67 +17:07:42.4: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2421 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:06:08.79 +25:23:50.5: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:14.05 +20:19:25.7: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:08.79 +25:23:50.5: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4220 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:14.05 +20:19:25.7: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9950 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:02:33.31 +22:40:43.1: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:33.31 +22:40:43.1: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8939 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:04:25.57 +19:25:29.8: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:33:57.01 +22:41:46.2: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:04:25.57 +19:25:29.8: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:25.57 +19:25:29.8: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6403 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:33:57.01 +22:41:46.2: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:57.01 +22:41:46.2: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8333 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 04:59:20.94 +23:55:16.2: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 04:59:20.94 +23:55:16.2: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47576.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190593_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 190593_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190636_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 190636_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190685_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 190685_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190687_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 190687_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190792_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 190792_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190818_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 190818_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190831_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 190831_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190885_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 190885_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190910_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 190910_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190986_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 190986_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191112_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 191112_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191116_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 191116_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191323_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 191323_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:51.75 +26:03:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191480_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 191480_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.82 +20:10:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191490_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 191490_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.21 +20:53:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 191582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.86 +23:11:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14842_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 14842_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:31.25 +26:06:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36974_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 36974_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72872_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 72872_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83037_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 83037_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (51.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84362_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 84362_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:24.07 +21:48:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81205_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 81205_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-22-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks