This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.4309 2461347.9309 13.18 04:28:01.79 +02:00:29.0
192.72859 -30.32888 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.618 Elfriede -0 -0 0 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:28:01.79 +02:00:29.0: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:28:01.79 +02:00:29.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4309* 04 28 01.79 +02 00 29.0 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9309,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4309 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.4309 2461347.9309 13.57 03:50:26.67 +06:13:54.6
182.05281 -35.36660 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.404 Arsinoe 0 0 0 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:50:26.67 +06:13:54.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:50:26.67 +06:13:54.6: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4309* 03 50 26.67 +06 13 54.6 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9309,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4309 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.4309 2461347.9309 14.36 04:40:11.92 +04:33:09.7
192.21078 -26.39303 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.439 Ohio 1 0 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:40:11.92 +04:33:09.7: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:40:11.92 +04:33:09.7: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4309* 04 40 11.92 +04 33 09.7 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9309,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4309 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.4309 2461347.9309 14.35 04:13:54.53 +06:18:09.6
186.29869 -30.74503 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1564 Srbija 1 1 1 14.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:13:54.53 +06:18:09.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:13:54.53 +06:18:09.6: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4309* 04 13 54.53 +06 18 09.6 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9309,14.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4309 14.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.4309 2461347.9309 14.78 03:59:36.75 +06:41:44.5
183.36471 -33.31023 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2235 Vittore 0 -1 1 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:59:36.75 +06:41:44.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:59:36.75 +06:41:44.5: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4309* 03 59 36.75 +06 41 44.5 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9309,14.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4309 14.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.69103028 21.01.2026 04:34:55.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
First image: 2461061.69103028 21.01.2026 04:34:55.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Last image: 2461347.93127306 03.11.2026 10:20:51.992 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 22
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9313
Objects passed selection criteria: 9310
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8737.25
Average stars matched: 8349.5 (95.5621 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235032 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 04:28:50 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.69103028 21.01.2026 04:34:55.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
First image: 2461061.69103028 21.01.2026 04:34:55.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Last image: 2461347.93127306 03.11.2026 10:20:51.992 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 101
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.14
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 50739
Objects passed selection criteria: 50632
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 48760
Average stars matched: 47090.5 (96.5761 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 277072 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 04:29:46 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.93060760
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:16:56.546 +05:59:41.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14
Second-epoch image center 04:16:56.546 +05:59:41.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0857 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:16:59.546 +06:00:15.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14
Second-epoch image center 04:16:59.546 +06:00:15.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0759 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:16:56.546 +05:59:41.38
Second-epoch second image center 04:16:59.546 +06:00:15.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01563 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jvLSz7UTXI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DwLoadik4W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mKek86pSIZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hUTSPBBa8t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8663 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3081 to 72.2820 deg, Dec +0.6924 to +11.2683 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3081 to 72.2820 deg, Dec 0.6924 to 11.2683 deg
Loaded 5018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4111 out of 4342 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4342 out of 8663 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8663 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3081 to 72.2820 deg, Dec +0.6924 to +11.2683 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3081 to 72.2820 deg, Dec 0.6924 to 11.2683 deg
Loaded 5018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4111 out of 4342 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4342 out of 8663 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 7732 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.2889 to 72.2642 deg, Dec +0.7253 to +11.3032 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.2889 to 72.2642 deg, Dec 0.7253 to 11.3032 deg
Loaded 5008 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4066 out of 4298 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4298 out of 7732 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 21 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.1 pix Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.jvLSz7UTXI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=654, bad_region=0, passed=8663
Got 8663 stars (including 7997 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8663 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.230 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.212 n_q1=1399 n_q2=1092 n_q3=1452 n_q4=952 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4895 N_valid=4895 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.215 p95_sep_arcsec=0.834 n_q1=1399 n_q2=1092 n_q3=1452 n_q4=952 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DwLoadik4W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=626, bad_region=0, passed=7732
Got 7732 stars (including 7100 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7732 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=1405 n_q2=1094 n_q3=1448 n_q4=948 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4895 N_valid=4895 bias_ra_arcsec=0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.269 p95_sep_arcsec=0.788 n_q1=1405 n_q2=1094 n_q3=1448 n_q4=948 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mKek86pSIZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=540, bad_region=1, passed=9388
Got 9388 stars (including 8835 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9388 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 509 (Dec 0.5 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 509 (Dec 0.5 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=13.091 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.526 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.526 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=0.439 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.685 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.685 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=0.270 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.374 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.374 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4895 robust_rms_before=0.865 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.263 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.270 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.401 worst_region_rms_after=0.374 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.095 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.374
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.401 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.401 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.263 arcsec matched=4895
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.231 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=1454 n_q2=1026 n_q3=1507 n_q4=908 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4895 N_valid=4895 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.398 bias_dec_arcsec=0.424 median_sep_arcsec=0.746 p95_sep_arcsec=1.787 n_q1=1454 n_q2=1026 n_q3=1507 n_q4=908 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hUTSPBBa8t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=554, bad_region=1, passed=9388
Got 9388 stars (including 8821 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9388 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 509 (Dec 0.5 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 509 (Dec 0.5 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=13.178 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.575 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.575 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.413 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.664 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.664 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.263 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.388 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.388 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4897 robust_rms_before=0.848 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.266 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.263 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.401 worst_region_rms_after=0.388 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.071 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.388
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.401 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.401 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.266 arcsec matched=4897
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.236 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.283 n_q1=1455 n_q2=1024 n_q3=1507 n_q4=911 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4897 N_valid=4897 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.352 bias_dec_arcsec=0.429 median_sep_arcsec=0.735 p95_sep_arcsec=1.789 n_q1=1455 n_q2=1024 n_q3=1507 n_q4=911 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits sigma_overall=0.251 worst_q_ratio=1.251
ref2=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits sigma_overall=0.334 worst_q_ratio=1.258
new1=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits sigma_overall=0.272 worst_q_ratio=1.164
new2=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits sigma_overall=0.272 worst_q_ratio=1.144
reference average sigma_overall=0.2925 worst_q_ratio=1.2545
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:34:51.08 +05:00:24.6: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:40:54.10 +06:36:32.2: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:22:40.00 +03:45:45.0: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:43:44.67 +06:39:04.7: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:45:50.17 +03:02:25.4: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:26:18.41 +02:24:46.5: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:24:26.55 +05:10:07.3: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:37:03.47 +09:26:03.0: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:25:26.47 +07:07:38.5: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:10:21.32 +09:23:32.5: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:26:18.41 +02:24:46.5: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:45:50.17 +03:02:25.4: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:34:51.08 +05:00:24.6: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:43:44.67 +06:39:04.7: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:22:40.00 +03:45:45.0: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:18.41 +02:24:46.5: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2894 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:50.17 +03:02:25.4: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2261 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:40:54.10 +06:36:32.2: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:44.67 +06:39:04.7: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1594 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:24:26.55 +05:10:07.3: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:51.08 +05:00:24.6: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1015 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:40.00 +03:45:45.0: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1195 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:54.10 +06:36:32.2: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3192 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:26.55 +05:10:07.3: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2900 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:25:26.47 +07:07:38.5: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:26.47 +07:07:38.5: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3127 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:10:21.32 +09:23:32.5: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:21.32 +09:23:32.5: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2973 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:37:03.47 +09:26:03.0: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:03.47 +09:26:03.0: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2482 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:18:07.53 +04:56:57.5: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:13:43.05 +06:37:25.3: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:26:33.55 +04:12:50.7: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:14:00.77 +05:53:43.4: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:17:25.12 +06:53:06.5: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:45:22.07 +07:15:04.0: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:18:07.53 +04:56:57.5: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:14:00.77 +05:53:43.4: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:13:43.05 +06:37:25.3: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:00.77 +05:53:43.4: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3163 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:07.53 +04:56:57.5: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3466 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:26:33.55 +04:12:50.7: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:43.05 +06:37:25.3: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3330 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:17:25.12 +06:53:06.5: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:33.55 +04:12:50.7: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2999 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:25.12 +06:53:06.5: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3274 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:45:22.07 +07:15:04.0: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:22.07 +07:15:04.0: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3332 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20318_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20318_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20322_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20322_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:12.07 +07:01:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20323_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20323_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20325_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20325_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20326_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20326_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:15.45 +06:34:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20332_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20332_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:22.54 +05:07:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20335_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20335_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20337_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20337_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20340_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20340_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20347_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20347_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20348_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20348_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20349_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20349_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20351_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20351_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20353_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20353_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20354_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20354_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20355_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20355_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20356_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20356_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20357_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20357_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20361_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 20361_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01031_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 01031_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.72 +09:56:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02355_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 02355_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:14.45 +08:20:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:16:56.546 +05:59:41.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14
Second-epoch image center 04:16:56.546 +05:59:41.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0857 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:16:59.546 +06:00:15.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14
Second-epoch image center 04:16:59.546 +06:00:15.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0759 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:16:56.546 +05:59:41.38
Second-epoch second image center 04:16:59.546 +06:00:15.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01563 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m9qftMSDPI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pVr2ioWfS4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits &> /tmp/tmp.olsxTLehYQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D6dKOlaNmk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 52195 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3081 to 72.2950 deg, Dec +0.6737 to +11.2686 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3081 to 72.2950 deg, Dec 0.6737 to 11.2686 deg
Loaded 5032 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3858 out of 4399 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4399 out of 52195 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.803250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.803250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.14
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 52195 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3081 to 72.2950 deg, Dec +0.6737 to +11.2686 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3081 to 72.2950 deg, Dec 0.6737 to 11.2686 deg
Loaded 5032 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3858 out of 4399 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4399 out of 52195 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 48772 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.2863 to 72.2652 deg, Dec +0.7157 to +11.3031 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.2863 to 72.2652 deg, Dec 0.7157 to 11.3031 deg
Loaded 5015 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3858 out of 4392 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4392 out of 48772 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 86 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
1.9 pix Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.m9qftMSDPI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2672, bad_region=14, passed=52184
Got 52184 stars (including 49407 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52184 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.218 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.215 n_q1=1397 n_q2=1087 n_q3=1447 n_q4=973 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4904 N_valid=4904 bias_ra_arcsec=0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.213 p95_sep_arcsec=0.844 n_q1=1397 n_q2=1087 n_q3=1447 n_q4=973 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pVr2ioWfS4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2468, bad_region=1, passed=48757
Got 48757 stars (including 46206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48757 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1406 n_q2=1097 n_q3=1440 n_q4=960 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4903 N_valid=4903 bias_ra_arcsec=0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.264 p95_sep_arcsec=0.803 n_q1=1406 n_q2=1097 n_q3=1440 n_q4=960 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.olsxTLehYQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2075, bad_region=47, passed=47772
Got 47772 stars (including 45557 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47772 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 509 (Dec 0.4 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47772 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 509 (Dec 0.4 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47772 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47772 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=13.287 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.534 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.534 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.440 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.708 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.708 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.269 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.370 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.370 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4893 robust_rms_before=0.875 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.261 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.269 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.390 worst_region_rms_after=0.370 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.107 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.370
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.390 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.390 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.261 arcsec matched=4893
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=1461 n_q2=1025 n_q3=1507 n_q4=900 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4893 N_valid=4893 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.410 bias_dec_arcsec=0.435 median_sep_arcsec=0.759 p95_sep_arcsec=1.795 n_q1=1461 n_q2=1025 n_q3=1507 n_q4=900 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.D6dKOlaNmk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2087, bad_region=47, passed=47706
Got 47706 stars (including 45502 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47706 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 509 (Dec 0.4 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 509 (Dec 0.4 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=13.261 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.656 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.656 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.678 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.678 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.262 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.381 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.381 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4893 robust_rms_before=0.856 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.262 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.262 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.396 worst_region_rms_after=0.381 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.084 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.381
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.396 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.396 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.262 arcsec matched=4893
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.236 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1462 n_q2=1033 n_q3=1500 n_q4=898 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4893 N_valid=4893 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.357 bias_dec_arcsec=0.443 median_sep_arcsec=0.743 p95_sep_arcsec=1.797 n_q1=1462 n_q2=1033 n_q3=1500 n_q4=898 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-19-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0491.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_042333_TTUQ1b1x1_3456648_MAtH9rJy/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:53:59.60 +09:29:33.4: 14.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:46:33.02 +10:41:32.5: 14.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:48:27.25 +07:22:29.9: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:43:45.24 +06:18:23.5: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:30:57.37 +04:54:56.3: 14.60 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:16:54.76 +04:43:33.1: 15.15 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:40:41.95 +07:31:20.5: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:30:57.37 +04:54:56.3: 14.59 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:53:59.60 +09:29:33.4: 14.21 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:48:27.25 +07:22:29.9: 14.06 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:46:33.02 +10:41:32.5: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:43:45.24 +06:18:23.5: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:33:22.90 +09:24:10.8: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:26:53.70 +07:07:14.2: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:28:01.79 +02:00:29.0: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:16:54.76 +04:43:33.1: 15.19 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:40:41.95 +07:31:20.5: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:57.37 +04:54:56.3: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4908 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:59.60 +09:29:33.4: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2541 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:27.25 +07:22:29.9: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0750 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:33.02 +10:41:32.5: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4812 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:45.24 +06:18:23.5: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4097 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:54.76 +04:43:33.1: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9707 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:41.95 +07:31:20.5: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9501 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:28:01.79 +02:00:29.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:26:53.70 +07:07:14.2: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:33:22.90 +09:24:10.8: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:53.70 +07:07:14.2: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7433 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:22.90 +09:24:10.8: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9679 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:50:26.67 +06:13:54.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:45:45.80 +03:02:08.6: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:47:38.32 +04:27:47.3: 14.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:45:21.99 +07:57:56.2: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:56:30.40 +08:25:16.0: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:23:51.97 +06:56:32.8: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:13:44.36 +03:23:30.4: 14.46 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:50:26.67 +06:13:54.6: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:45:45.80 +03:02:08.6: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:45.80 +03:02:08.6: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5038 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:47:38.32 +04:27:47.3: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:23:51.97 +06:56:32.8: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:56:30.40 +08:25:16.0: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:45:21.99 +07:57:56.2: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:13:54.53 +06:18:09.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:38.32 +04:27:47.3: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5878 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:30.40 +08:25:16.0: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1737 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:51.97 +06:56:32.8: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0007 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:21.99 +07:57:56.2: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0633 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:40:11.92 +04:33:09.7: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:13:44.36 +03:23:30.4: 14.55 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:44.36 +03:23:30.4: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4591 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:40:11.92 +04:33:09.7: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:13:54.53 +06:18:09.6: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:45:59.84 +01:17:37.9: 15.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:42:52.80 +09:19:44.3: 14.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:43:59.05 +07:27:27.4: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:31:15.16 +05:52:05.6: 15.06 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:42:58.60 +09:38:27.7: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:30:45.62 +01:25:02.7: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:45:59.84 +01:17:37.9: 14.66 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:59.84 +01:17:37.9: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7239 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:42:52.80 +09:19:44.3: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:31:15.16 +05:52:05.6: 14.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:42:58.60 +09:38:27.7: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:43:59.05 +07:27:27.4: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:52.80 +09:19:44.3: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6801 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:15.16 +05:52:05.6: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6537 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:58.60 +09:38:27.7: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7269 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:59.05 +07:27:27.4: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7494 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:30:45.62 +01:25:02.7: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:45.62 +01:25:02.7: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6622 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:34:54.90 +08:38:00.7: 14.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:03:06.26 +11:08:43.0: 14.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:48:39.52 +03:12:20.2: 14.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:55:27.14 +09:55:03.0: 15.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:27:33.23 +10:26:12.6: 14.90 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:48:22.05 +07:58:28.4: 15.22 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:55:27.14 +09:55:03.0: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:03:06.26 +11:08:43.0: 15.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:34:54.90 +08:38:00.7: 14.49 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:48:39.52 +03:12:20.2: 14.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:27.14 +09:55:03.0: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5890 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:54.90 +08:38:00.7: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6194 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:06.26 +11:08:43.0: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6311 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:39.52 +03:12:20.2: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5257 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:27:33.23 +10:26:12.6: 15.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:33.23 +10:26:12.6: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7235 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:48:22.05 +07:58:28.4: 14.93 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:22.05 +07:58:28.4: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8491 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:56:39.82 +08:43:32.9: 14.53 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:41:50.78 +03:23:02.7: 15.16 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:54:39.65 +05:27:09.1: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:43:26.67 +08:06:34.1: 15.47 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:32:14.35 +09:24:27.8: 15.14 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:44:29.44 +06:39:37.1: 15.50 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:54:39.65 +05:27:09.1: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:56:39.82 +08:43:32.9: 14.50 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:41:50.78 +03:23:02.7: 15.55 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:43:26.67 +08:06:34.1: 15.24 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:39.65 +05:27:09.1: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6711 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:39.82 +08:43:32.9: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6093 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:50.78 +03:23:02.7: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8542 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:26.67 +08:06:34.1: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8457 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:32:14.35 +09:24:27.8: 14.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:14.35 +09:24:27.8: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7761 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:44:29.44 +06:39:37.1: 15.35 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:29.44 +06:39:37.1: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9021 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:59:36.75 +06:41:44.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:51:01.78 +07:14:20.5: 15.19 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:29:07.50 +07:01:14.7: 15.20 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:46:28.94 +09:59:13.4: 15.20 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:42:23.39 +03:13:35.5: 14.87 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:59:36.75 +06:41:44.5: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:51:01.78 +07:14:20.5: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:29:07.50 +07:01:14.7: 14.95 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:46:28.94 +09:59:13.4: 14.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:01.78 +07:14:20.5: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7751 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:28.94 +09:59:13.4: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7431 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:07.50 +07:01:14.7: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8578 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:42:58.69 +07:41:00.6: 15.58 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:42:23.39 +03:13:35.5: 15.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:23.39 +03:13:35.5: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9271 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:42:58.69 +07:41:00.6: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:58.69 +07:41:00.6: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7468 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:50:06.98 +07:57:57.8: 14.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:07:50.01 +05:06:29.3: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:38:43.66 +08:09:35.9: 15.30 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:58:44.10 +11:07:58.4: 15.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:50:06.98 +07:57:57.8: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:07:50.01 +05:06:29.3: 14.37 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:06.98 +07:57:57.8: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6980 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:50.01 +05:06:29.3: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6296 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:38:43.66 +08:09:35.9: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:43.66 +08:09:35.9: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9322 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:58:44.10 +11:07:58.4: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:44.10 +11:07:58.4: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8254 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:36:19.93 +10:06:41.6: 15.33 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:45:52.82 +05:13:26.1: 15.06 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:52:10.26 +09:34:28.3: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:21:41.53 +05:44:33.7: 15.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:36:19.93 +10:06:41.6: 15.20 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:19.93 +10:06:41.6: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0082 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:26:12.15 +09:51:53.2: 15.54 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:45:52.82 +05:13:26.1: 15.20 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:52:10.26 +09:34:28.3: 15.11 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:21:41.53 +05:44:33.7: 15.03 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:52.82 +05:13:26.1: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7695 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:10.26 +09:34:28.3: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7917 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:41.53 +05:44:33.7: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8332 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:26:12.15 +09:51:53.2: 15.67 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.59 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:12.15 +09:51:53.2: ref_mag=15.59 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.9697 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:32:47.99 +09:59:03.0: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:58:22.35 +09:37:54.1: 15.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:51:29.89 +05:10:21.9: 15.14 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:02:38.72 +08:44:29.9: 15.30 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:32:47.99 +09:59:03.0: 15.35 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:47.99 +09:59:03.0: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0534 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:26:39.95 +07:10:07.5: 14.87 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:58:22.35 +09:37:54.1: 15.25 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:02:38.72 +08:44:29.9: 15.09 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:51:29.89 +05:10:21.9: 15.45 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:22.35 +09:37:54.1: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8559 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:38.72 +08:44:29.9: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8624 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:29.89 +05:10:21.9: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7458 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:26:39.95 +07:10:07.5: 14.83 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:39.95 +07:10:07.5: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7955 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:50:51.02 +08:07:23.9: 15.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:46:56.91 +07:31:15.2: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:32:56.11 +02:00:55.2: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:23:12.03 +06:42:02.3: 14.92 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:50:51.02 +08:07:23.9: 15.58 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:51.02 +08:07:23.9: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7264 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:31:08.91 +04:58:03.1: 15.23 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:46:56.91 +07:31:15.2: 14.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:32:56.11 +02:00:55.2: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:56.91 +07:31:15.2: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7257 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:56.11 +02:00:55.2: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9180 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:23:12.03 +06:42:02.3: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:12.03 +06:42:02.3: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8156 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:31:08.91 +04:58:03.1: 15.17 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:08.91 +04:58:03.1: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0507 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:10:52.46 +01:45:38.7: 15.35 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:57:02.73 +09:45:37.3: 15.27 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:53:41.04 +05:39:17.8: 14.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:01:46.35 +10:46:12.4: 15.36 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:10:52.46 +01:45:38.7: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:52.46 +01:45:38.7: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7730 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:01:49.33 +10:02:09.5: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:57:02.73 +09:45:37.3: 15.30 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:02.73 +09:45:37.3: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8597 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:53:41.04 +05:39:17.8: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:01:46.35 +10:46:12.4: 15.43 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:41.04 +05:39:17.8: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7614 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:46.35 +10:46:12.4: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8627 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:01:49.33 +10:02:09.5: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:49.33 +10:02:09.5: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7505 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:01:29.12 +10:58:04.4: 15.29 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:02:33.36 +10:57:07.8: 15.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:06:01.76 +04:40:05.4: 14.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:11:31.30 +08:04:43.7: 15.89 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:01:29.12 +10:58:04.4: 15.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:29.12 +10:58:04.4: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7664 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:07:50.63 +09:56:25.4: 15.34 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:02:33.36 +10:57:07.8: 15.19 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:06:01.76 +04:40:05.4: 15.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:11:31.30 +08:04:43.7: 15.62 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:33.36 +10:57:07.8: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9157 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:01.76 +04:40:05.4: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8445 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.74 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:31.30 +08:04:43.7: ref_mag=15.74 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.9829 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:07:50.63 +09:56:25.4: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:50.63 +09:56:25.4: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0342 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:01:42.56 +03:28:04.0: 15.18 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:53:54.99 +04:14:51.5: 15.17 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:55:57.52 +01:45:19.5: 15.44 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:51:12.60 +10:42:36.8: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:01:42.56 +03:28:04.0: 15.38 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:42.56 +03:28:04.0: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8307 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:51:12.60 +10:42:36.8: 14.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:53:54.99 +04:14:51.5: 15.36 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:55:57.52 +01:45:19.5: 14.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:12.60 +10:42:36.8: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7983 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:54.99 +04:14:51.5: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0109 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:57.52 +01:45:19.5: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7601 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:50:27.98 +03:15:28.1: 14.91 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:50:27.98 +03:15:28.1: 14.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:27.98 +03:15:28.1: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8777 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65217.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65465.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65913.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65920.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66134.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 86s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64776_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 64776_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64790_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 64790_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:56.30 +06:31:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64791_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 64791_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64794_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 64794_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64796_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 64796_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64800_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 64800_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64801_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 64801_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:28.24 +06:58:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64803_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 64803_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64807_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 64807_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:27.33 +03:03:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64809_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 64809_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64810_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 64810_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65081_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 65081_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65217_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
Preparing report for the candidate 65217_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65375_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 65375_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:16.61 +07:59:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65465_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
Preparing report for the candidate 65465_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65638_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 65638_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65715_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 65715_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65812_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 65812_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65864_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 65864_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65883_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 65883_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65909_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 65909_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65913_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
Preparing report for the candidate 65913_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65920_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
Preparing report for the candidate 65920_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65982_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 65982_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65991_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 65991_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65998_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 65998_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65999_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 65999_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66018_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66018_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66021_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66021_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66028_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66028_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66030_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66030_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66038_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66038_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66064_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66064_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66081_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66081_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66089_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66089_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66094_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66094_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66096_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66096_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66098_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66098_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66119_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66119_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66122_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66122_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66126_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66126_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66130_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66130_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66134_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
Preparing report for the candidate 66134_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66135_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66135_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66161_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66161_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66192_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66192_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66193_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66193_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66196_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66196_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66199_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66199_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66203_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66203_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66211_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66211_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66219_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66219_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66233_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66233_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66236_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66236_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66240_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66240_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66242_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66242_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66253_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66253_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66257_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66257_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66260_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66260_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66263_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66263_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66281_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66281_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66282_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66282_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66291_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66291_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66294_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66294_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66301_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66301_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66304_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66304_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66308_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66308_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66315_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66315_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66316_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66316_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66318_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66318_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66327_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66327_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66344_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66344_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66355_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66355_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66385_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66385_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66393_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66393_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66398_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66398_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66399_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66399_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66415_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66415_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66416_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66416_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66457_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66457_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66462_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66462_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66498_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66498_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66517_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 66517_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22027_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 22027_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:12.07 +07:01:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04926_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 04926_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.71 +09:56:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12986_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492
The candidate 12986_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-20-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0492 did not pass the final checks
