This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.4181 2461347.9181 12.37 03:58:17.93 +17:05:04.6
174.09000 -26.69946 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato -1 1 1 12.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:17.93 +17:05:04.6: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:17.93 +17:05:04.6: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4181* 03 58 17.93 +17 05 04.6 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9181,12.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4181 12.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.4181 2461347.9181 13.95 04:01:27.36 +13:28:31.9
177.67139 -28.58134 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1115 Sabauda -0 0 0 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:01:27.36 +13:28:31.9: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:01:27.36 +13:28:31.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4181* 04 01 27.36 +13 28 31.9 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9181,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4181 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.4181 2461347.9181 13.15 04:46:30.94 +14:01:34.5
184.71849 -19.70459 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.631 Philippina 0 0 0 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:46:30.94 +14:01:34.5: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:46:30.94 +14:01:34.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4181* 04 46 30.94 +14 01 34.5 13.2 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9181,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4181 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.4181 2461347.9181 13.67 04:21:05.50 +17:02:34.2
178.12213 -22.66701 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1171 Rusthawelia -0 1 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:21:05.50 +17:02:34.2: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:21:05.50 +17:02:34.2: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4181* 04 21 05.50 +17 02 34.2 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9181,13.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4181 13.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.4181 2461347.9181 15.07 03:58:24.36 +17:40:41.0
173.62966 -26.27159 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.858 El Djezair -1 0 1 15.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:24.36 +17:40:41.0: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:24.36 +17:40:41.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4181* 03 58 24.36 +17 40 41.0 15.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9181,15.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4181 15.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.4181 2461347.9181 15.03 04:12:34.00 +15:25:17.9
178.01789 -25.27586 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.609 Fulvia -0 1 1 15.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:12:34.00 +15:25:17.9: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:12:34.00 +15:25:17.9: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4181* 04 12 34.00 +15 25 17.9 15.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9181,15.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4181 15.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461347.91841513 03.11.2026 10:02:21.067 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 24
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9686
Objects passed selection criteria: 9684
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9179
Average stars matched: 8873.75 (96.6745 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236808 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 04:10:50 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461347.91841513 03.11.2026 10:02:21.067 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 75
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.00
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 58696
Objects passed selection criteria: 58574
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 55994.5
Average stars matched: 54236.2 (96.86 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 277292 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 04:12:38 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.91769284
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:40.197 +13:59:59.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:40.197 +13:59:59.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0015 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:43.394 +14:00:29.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:43.394 +14:00:29.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0168 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:40.197 +13:59:59.48
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:43.394 +14:00:29.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01544 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4IFcUdRMZp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UC4fjU34Yz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VAEctzG9hC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k0ZSPGMYIL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.989100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.989100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec +8.6216 to +19.2870 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec 8.6216 to 19.2870 deg
Loaded 4407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3650 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3650 out of 8488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 23 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.4IFcUdRMZp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=728, bad_region=0, passed=9344
Got 9344 stars (including 8597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1309 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1429 n_q4=1041 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4881 N_valid=4881 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.000 median_sep_arcsec=0.242 p95_sep_arcsec=0.885 n_q1=1309 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1429 n_q4=1041 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.UC4fjU34Yz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=679, bad_region=1, passed=8488
Got 8488 stars (including 7793 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=1282 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1405 n_q4=1054 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.472
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4882 N_valid=4882 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.269 p95_sep_arcsec=0.911 n_q1=1282 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1405 n_q4=1054 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VAEctzG9hC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=544, bad_region=0, passed=9566
Got 9566 stars (including 9004 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9566 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.4 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.4 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=13.740 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.655 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.655 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.653 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.653 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.260 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.387 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.387 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=1.057 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.268 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.260 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.411 worst_region_rms_after=0.387 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.087 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.387
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.411 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.411 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.268 arcsec matched=4880
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.218 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1348 n_q2=1076 n_q3=1450 n_q4=1006 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4880 N_valid=4880 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.612 bias_dec_arcsec=0.485 median_sep_arcsec=0.933 p95_sep_arcsec=2.014 n_q1=1348 n_q2=1076 n_q3=1450 n_q4=1006 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.k0ZSPGMYIL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=563, bad_region=0, passed=9595
Got 9595 stars (including 9017 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9595 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.4 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.4 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=13.735 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.530 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.530 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.423 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.690 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.690 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.266 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.397 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.397 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4877 robust_rms_before=1.043 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.278 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.266 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.433 worst_region_rms_after=0.397 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.084 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.397
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.433 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.433 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.278 arcsec matched=4877
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.226 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=1350 n_q2=1078 n_q3=1449 n_q4=1000 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4877 N_valid=4877 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.614 bias_dec_arcsec=0.466 median_sep_arcsec=0.929 p95_sep_arcsec=1.962 n_q1=1350 n_q2=1078 n_q3=1449 n_q4=1000 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.263
ref2=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.472
new1=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits sigma_overall=0.272 worst_q_ratio=1.222
new2=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits sigma_overall=0.284 worst_q_ratio=1.229
reference average sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.3675
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (4881 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474_astrometric_residuals.png (4877 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:37:10.36 +12:12:47.2: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:57.81 +15:19:05.5: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:47:46.08 +11:13:31.2: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:11.72 +13:18:27.1: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:36:31.60 +16:29:05.5: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:33:50.12 +13:06:46.1: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:31.10 +15:35:15.0: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:37:42.11 +15:09:37.3: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:17.93 +17:05:04.6: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:57:51.19 +11:44:06.4: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:11.72 +13:18:27.1: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:37:10.36 +12:12:47.2: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:57.81 +15:19:05.5: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:36:31.60 +16:29:05.5: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:31.10 +15:35:15.0: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:17.93 +17:05:04.6: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:37:42.11 +15:09:37.3: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:47:46.08 +11:13:31.2: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:33:50.12 +13:06:46.1: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:11.72 +13:18:27.1: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2960 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:31.10 +15:35:15.0: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2353 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:31.60 +16:29:05.5: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2947 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:57.81 +15:19:05.5: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3873 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:10.36 +12:12:47.2: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3440 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:42.11 +15:09:37.3: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4604 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:50.12 +13:06:46.1: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4251 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:46.08 +11:13:31.2: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3817 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:57:51.19 +11:44:06.4: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:57:51.19 +11:44:06.4: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4724 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:25:35.63 +15:49:48.4: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:41:56.59 +17:13:56.7: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:31.46 +13:55:47.6: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:32:10.15 +14:35:40.9: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:57.45 +14:22:48.2: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:30:18.47 +14:34:59.6: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:33:15.50 +14:47:07.5: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:54:45.37 +10:27:58.4: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:32:59.39 +14:21:36.8: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:25:35.63 +15:49:48.4: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:31.46 +13:55:47.6: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:33:15.50 +14:47:07.5: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:32:10.15 +14:35:40.9: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:30:18.47 +14:34:59.6: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:41:56.59 +17:13:56.7: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:35.63 +15:49:48.4: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4630 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:54:45.37 +10:27:58.4: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:57.45 +14:22:48.2: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:31.46 +13:55:47.6: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4835 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:15.50 +14:47:07.5: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5038 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:10.15 +14:35:40.9: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5001 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:18.47 +14:34:59.6: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4638 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:56.59 +17:13:56.7: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4940 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:45.37 +10:27:58.4: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4727 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:57.45 +14:22:48.2: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4644 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:32:59.39 +14:21:36.8: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:59.39 +14:21:36.8: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5103 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20359.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 54s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20233_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20233_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:25.29 +17:54:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20328_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20328_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20342_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20342_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20343_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20343_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20351_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20351_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20356_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20356_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20359_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
Preparing report for the candidate 20359_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20362_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20362_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20363_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20363_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20367_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20367_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20371_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20371_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20373_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20373_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20375_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20375_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20376_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20376_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20379_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20379_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20381_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20381_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20382_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20382_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20383_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20383_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20385_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20385_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20386_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20386_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04086_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 04086_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.98 +14:32:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.76 +09:56:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01595_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 01595_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.29 +17:32:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 56s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
03:58:17.93 +17:05:04.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:40.197 +13:59:59.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:40.197 +13:59:59.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0015 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:43.394 +14:00:29.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:43.394 +14:00:29.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0168 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:40.197 +13:59:59.48
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:43.394 +14:00:29.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01544 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.beiMizserY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dzBhkKZeZW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Cw32RzgMVY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits &> /tmp/tmp.59C2BYepyN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.852800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.852800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.00
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.85
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.85
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 58309 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec +8.6064 to +19.2869 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec 8.6064 to 19.2869 deg
Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3131 out of 3673 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3673 out of 58309 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
1.8 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.beiMizserY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3506, bad_region=5, passed=62251
Got 62251 stars (including 58597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62251 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1302 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1432 n_q4=1060 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4885 N_valid=4885 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=0.000 median_sep_arcsec=0.239 p95_sep_arcsec=0.871 n_q1=1302 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1432 n_q4=1060 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dzBhkKZeZW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3080, bad_region=5, passed=58299
Got 58299 stars (including 55093 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58299 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.235 n_q1=1266 n_q2=1129 n_q3=1416 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.486
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4884 N_valid=4884 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.264 p95_sep_arcsec=0.927 n_q1=1266 n_q2=1129 n_q3=1416 n_q4=1073 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Cw32RzgMVY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2470, bad_region=47, passed=52251
Got 52251 stars (including 49645 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52251 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.4 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.4 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=13.912 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.361 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.361 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.434 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.656 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.656 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.261 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.388 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.388 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4878 robust_rms_before=1.060 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.276 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.261 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.422 worst_region_rms_after=0.388 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.094 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.388
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.422 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.422 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.276 arcsec matched=4878
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.226 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=1348 n_q2=1073 n_q3=1443 n_q4=1014 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4878 N_valid=4878 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.606 bias_dec_arcsec=0.501 median_sep_arcsec=0.942 p95_sep_arcsec=1.999 n_q1=1348 n_q2=1073 n_q3=1443 n_q4=1014 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.59C2BYepyN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2595, bad_region=47, passed=52901
Got 52901 stars (including 50153 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52901 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.4 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.4 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=13.945 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.393 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.393 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.686 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.686 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.268 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.402 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.402 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4883 robust_rms_before=1.051 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.289 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.268 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.434 worst_region_rms_after=0.402 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.098 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.402
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.434 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.434 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.289 arcsec matched=4883
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.230 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1362 n_q2=1082 n_q3=1431 n_q4=1008 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4883 N_valid=4883 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.616 bias_dec_arcsec=0.484 median_sep_arcsec=0.948 p95_sep_arcsec=1.958 n_q1=1362 n_q2=1082 n_q3=1431 n_q4=1008 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-01-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040534_TTUQ1b1x1_2579842_tHS2pLk3/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:11:20.13 +12:42:34.0: 14.96 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:37.88 +13:31:21.0: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:10.06 +11:13:42.5: 14.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:25:57.40 +16:48:53.7: 13.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:11:19.79 +15:58:51.5: 15.29 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:39:26.06 +09:52:24.6: 14.57 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:01:27.36 +13:28:31.9: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:20:36.32 +18:55:08.6: 14.66 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:56:58.53 +10:20:58.0: 14.65 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:07.09 +15:52:45.9: 15.07 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:11:19.79 +15:58:51.5: 15.33 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:56:58.53 +10:20:58.0: 15.24 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:25:57.40 +16:48:53.7: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:11:20.13 +12:42:34.0: 14.81 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:10.06 +11:13:42.5: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:19.79 +15:58:51.5: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9333 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:37.88 +13:31:21.0: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:39:26.06 +09:52:24.6: 14.65 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:58.53 +10:20:58.0: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6733 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:20:36.32 +18:55:08.6: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:57.40 +16:48:53.7: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8224 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:20.13 +12:42:34.0: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7900 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:01:27.36 +13:28:31.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:10.06 +11:13:42.5: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5100 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:07.09 +15:52:45.9: 15.10 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:37.88 +13:31:21.0: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2980 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:26.06 +09:52:24.6: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5164 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:36.32 +18:55:08.6: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6387 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:07.09 +15:52:45.9: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8711 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:21:05.50 +17:02:34.2: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:51:49.04 +13:37:43.4: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:35.51 +17:25:28.6: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:46:30.94 +14:01:34.5: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:39:11.25 +17:52:56.8: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:25:38.65 +17:55:22.8: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:32:52.19 +18:55:02.2: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:28.43 +18:01:07.5: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:32:51.81 +12:35:29.9: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:46:30.94 +14:01:34.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:21:05.50 +17:02:34.2: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:32:52.19 +18:55:02.2: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:51:49.04 +13:37:43.4: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:28.43 +18:01:07.5: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:39:11.25 +17:52:56.8: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:35.51 +17:25:28.6: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:52.19 +18:55:02.2: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5330 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:49.04 +13:37:43.4: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8254 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:28.43 +18:01:07.5: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0096 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:11.25 +17:52:56.8: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8023 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:35.51 +17:25:28.6: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4876 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:25:38.65 +17:55:22.8: 13.99 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:38.65 +17:55:22.8: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0194 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:32:51.81 +12:35:29.9: 14.44 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:51.81 +12:35:29.9: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5217 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:55.47 +14:05:09.1: 14.52 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:31:17.82 +17:39:39.9: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:45:47.35 +15:56:19.5: 14.76 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:57:02.03 +09:41:48.7: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:55:45.27 +18:16:04.4: 14.89 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:23:37.88 +17:02:43.0: 14.64 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:00.63 +16:00:56.2: 14.84 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:45:47.35 +15:56:19.5: 14.78 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:55.47 +14:05:09.1: 14.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:47.35 +15:56:19.5: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6816 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:55:45.27 +18:16:04.4: 14.63 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:55.47 +14:05:09.1: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5117 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:57:02.03 +09:41:48.7: 15.21 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:31:17.82 +17:39:39.9: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:45.27 +18:16:04.4: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6243 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:57:02.03 +09:41:48.7: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9177 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:17.82 +17:39:39.9: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6645 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:23:37.88 +17:02:43.0: 14.61 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:00.63 +16:00:56.2: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:37.88 +17:02:43.0: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6428 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:00.63 +16:00:56.2: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9023 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:45:51.71 +18:21:49.3: 15.68 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:51:48.51 +17:58:30.9: 15.53 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:11.30 +10:26:09.0: 15.17 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:35:11.44 +16:28:05.4: 15.30 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:50:13.07 +10:30:04.9: 15.44 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:42.47 +16:50:34.5: 15.45 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:59:08.02 +15:18:08.0: 15.42 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:51:48.51 +17:58:30.9: 15.34 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:50:13.07 +10:30:04.9: 15.26 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:11.30 +10:26:09.0: 14.96 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:45:51.71 +18:21:49.3: 15.75 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:35:11.44 +16:28:05.4: 15.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:48.51 +17:58:30.9: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0033 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:13.07 +10:30:04.9: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0130 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.71 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:11.30 +10:26:09.0: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8572 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:51.71 +18:21:49.3: ref_mag=15.71 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=15.0610 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:11.44 +16:28:05.4: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0061 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:59:08.02 +15:18:08.0: 15.34 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:42.47 +16:50:34.5: 15.33 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:08.02 +15:18:08.0: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8802 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:42.47 +16:50:34.5: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9040 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:45:52.97 +18:47:56.8: 15.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:57:30.76 +16:14:04.6: 15.42 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:58:19.83 +14:57:15.3: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:07:09.76 +19:05:17.1: 15.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:09:35.92 +12:34:30.2: 15.66 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:00:44.57 +11:36:43.9: 15.26 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:48:06.48 +08:53:13.5: 15.00 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:58:19.83 +14:57:15.3: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:45:52.97 +18:47:56.8: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:07:09.76 +19:05:17.1: 15.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:09:35.92 +12:34:30.2: 15.17 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:57:30.76 +16:14:04.6: 15.21 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:52.97 +18:47:56.8: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8938 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:58:19.83 +14:57:15.3: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1498 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:09.76 +19:05:17.1: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8788 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:35.92 +12:34:30.2: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9900 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:57:30.76 +16:14:04.6: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0750 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:00:44.57 +11:36:43.9: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:48:06.48 +08:53:13.5: 15.32 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:44.57 +11:36:43.9: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9590 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:06.48 +08:53:13.5: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8506 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:49:16.93 +12:56:54.0: 15.25 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:33:17.03 +17:28:58.7: 15.32 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:43:01.18 +17:52:41.2: 15.56 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:29.58 +17:56:08.3: 15.33 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:01:38.94 +18:31:43.1: 15.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:47:50.70 +12:54:34.5: 15.93 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:29.27 +10:55:57.6: 15.22 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:49:16.93 +12:56:54.0: 15.36 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:33:17.03 +17:28:58.7: 15.36 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:43:01.18 +17:52:41.2: 15.33 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:16.93 +12:56:54.0: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0386 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:01:38.94 +18:31:43.1: 15.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:29.58 +17:56:08.3: 15.42 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:17.03 +17:28:58.7: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0750 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:01.18 +17:52:41.2: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1030 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:38.94 +18:31:43.1: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9753 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:29.58 +17:56:08.3: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1309 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:47:50.70 +12:54:34.5: 15.11 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:29.27 +10:55:57.6: 15.27 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:50.70 +12:54:34.5: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1555 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:29.27 +10:55:57.6: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9247 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:06:17.87 +13:13:28.5: 15.17 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:04:01.17 +13:20:43.4: 15.01 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:17:55.16 +11:35:25.3: 15.69 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:04.76 +13:33:22.3: 15.11 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:39.38 +08:53:58.7: 15.54 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:24.36 +17:40:41.0: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:12:34.00 +15:25:17.9: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:04.76 +13:33:22.3: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:04:01.17 +13:20:43.4: 15.23 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:39.38 +08:53:58.7: 15.38 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:17:55.16 +11:35:25.3: 15.26 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:06:17.87 +13:13:28.5: 15.28 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:24.36 +17:40:41.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:01.17 +13:20:43.4: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0613 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:04.76 +13:33:22.3: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8234 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:39.38 +08:53:58.7: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0180 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:17.87 +13:13:28.5: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0726 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:55.16 +11:35:25.3: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1089 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:12:34.00 +15:25:17.9: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:52.18 +09:05:49.7: 15.39 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:06:19.73 +17:19:51.6: 15.83 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:52.18 +09:05:49.7: 15.38 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:52.18 +09:05:49.7: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1023 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:06:19.73 +17:19:51.6: 15.43 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.60 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:19.73 +17:19:51.6: ref_mag=15.60 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.1802 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out75666.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76066.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76312.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77473.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77477.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 57s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75639_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 75639_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75640_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 75640_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75646_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 75646_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75648_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 75648_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75652_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 75652_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75653_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 75653_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75654_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 75654_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75660_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 75660_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75666_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
Preparing report for the candidate 75666_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75668_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 75668_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76066_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
Preparing report for the candidate 76066_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76218_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 76218_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76312_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
Preparing report for the candidate 76312_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76380_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 76380_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76382_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 76382_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76548_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 76548_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76586_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 76586_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76703_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 76703_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76846_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 76846_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 76875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76905_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 76905_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76909_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 76909_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:04.71 +17:34:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76975_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 76975_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76980_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 76980_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77102_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77102_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77119_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77119_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77122_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77122_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77149_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77149_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77181_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77181_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77205_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77205_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77243_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77243_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77248_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77248_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77263_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77263_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77265_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77265_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77270_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77270_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77279_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77279_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77283_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77283_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77291_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77291_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77294_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77294_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77301_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77301_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77324_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77324_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77334_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77334_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77338_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77338_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77355_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77355_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77366_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77366_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77367_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77367_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77378_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77378_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77389_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77389_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77406_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77406_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77414_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77414_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77423_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77423_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77435_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77435_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77456_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77456_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77466_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77466_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77473_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
Preparing report for the candidate 77473_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77477_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
Preparing report for the candidate 77477_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77486_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77486_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77524_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 77524_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03602_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 03602_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.49 +18:37:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13060_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 13060_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:17.93 +17:05:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.28 +17:32:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-02-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
