This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3854 2461347.8854 10.44 08:33:48.35 -23:26:06.7
245.79998 9.86787 galactic Pyx Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J083348-2326.1
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.100 V 12.200 V 2458108.70000 114.500000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:33:48.35 -23:26:06.7: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:33:48.35 -23:26:06.7: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J083348-2326.1,2461347.8854,10.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J083348-2326.1 20261103.3854 10.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3854 2461347.8854 12.93 08:43:24.93 -30:06:03.6
252.51208 7.62699 galactic Pyx Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 7.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J084325.00-300601.0
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.350 V 14.680 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:43:24.93 -30:06:03.6: 14.60 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:43:24.93 -30:06:03.6: 14.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.12
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J084325.00-300601.0,2461347.8854,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J084325.00-300601.0 20261103.3854 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3854 2461347.8854 13.04 08:32:59.77 -25:47:30.3
247.63356 8.34810 galactic Pyx Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J083259.86-254729.2
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.360 V 15.220 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:32:59.77 -25:47:30.3: 14.00 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:32:59.77 -25:47:30.3: 14.07 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J083259.86-254729.2,2461347.8854,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J083259.86-254729.2 20261103.3854 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3854 2461347.8854 12.22 08:37:19.62 -29:29:51.2
251.22385 6.93713 galactic Pyx Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J083719.61-292952.2
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.570 V 14.180 V 2457421.70000 126.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:37:19.62 -29:29:51.2: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:37:19.62 -29:29:51.2: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J083719.61-292952.2,2461347.8854,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J083719.61-292952.2 20261103.3854 12.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3854 2461347.8854 12.13 08:39:42.91 -26:40:48.5
249.25820 9.04105 galactic Pyx Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J083943.16-264048.6
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.620 V 14.340 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:39:42.91 -26:40:48.5: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:39:42.91 -26:40:48.5: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J083943.16-264048.6,2461347.8854,12.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J083943.16-264048.6 20261103.3854 12.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3854 2461347.8854 11.97 08:40:08.29 -30:06:07.1
252.07963 7.06263 galactic Pyx Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J084008.23-300607.9
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.020 V 13.350 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:40:08.29 -30:06:07.1: 12.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:40:08.29 -30:06:07.1: 12.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J084008.23-300607.9,2461347.8854,11.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J084008.23-300607.9 20261103.3854 11.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3854 2461347.8854 12.88 08:32:03.70 -24:51:17.2
246.73840 8.72074 galactic Pyx Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J083203.80-245117.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.220 V 14.910 V 2457477.70000 97.100000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:32:03.70 -24:51:17.2: 13.85 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:32:03.70 -24:51:17.2: 13.83 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J083203.80-245117.6,2461347.8854,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J083203.80-245117.6 20261103.3854 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3854 2461347.8854 12.88 08:23:58.34 -27:08:36.2
247.57590 5.91878 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J082358.41-270837.2
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.120 V 15.110 V 2457707.80000 280.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:23:58.34 -27:08:36.2: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:23:58.34 -27:08:36.2: 13.92 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J082358.41-270837.2,2461347.8854,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J082358.41-270837.2 20261103.3854 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3854 2461347.8854 11.72 08:47:09.92 -23:01:06.3
247.30726 12.58960 galactic Pyx Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J084710-2301.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.264 Ic Y 0.078 Ic 2452432.40000 35.070000000000 M5:e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:47:09.92 -23:01:06.3: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:47:09.92 -23:01:06.3: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J084710-2301.1,2461347.8854,11.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J084710-2301.1 20261103.3854 11.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3854 2461347.8854 11.21 08:53:49.20 -25:09:04.3
249.98746 12.48808 galactic Pyx Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J085349-2509.1
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.260 V Y 0.810 V 2452156.20000 91.500000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:53:49.20 -25:09:04.3: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:53:49.20 -25:09:04.3: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J085349-2509.1,2461347.8854,11.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J085349-2509.1 20261103.3854 11.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3854 2461347.8854 12.52 09:07:32.45 -26:56:24.1
253.41596 13.73174 galactic Pyx Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J090732.55-265623.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.010 g Y 0.540 g 2458448.74200 454.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:07:32.45 -26:56:24.1: 13.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:07:32.45 -26:56:24.1: 13.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J090732.55-265623.7,2461347.8854,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J090732.55-265623.7 20261103.3854 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3854 2461347.8854 10.05 08:15:22.94 -29:43:46.3
248.65809 2.90399 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J081523-2943.8
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.770 V Y 0.580 V 2452079.80000 105.500000000000 S5*2
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:15:22.94 -29:43:46.3: 10.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:15:22.94 -29:43:46.3: 10.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.97 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J081523-2943.8,2461347.8854,10.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J081523-2943.8 20261103.3854 10.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3854 2461347.8854 12.31 08:45:39.15 -30:42:58.1
253.30072 7.63190 galactic Pyx Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J084539.23-304258.0
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.600 V 14.040 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:45:39.15 -30:42:58.1: 13.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:45:39.15 -30:42:58.1: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J084539.23-304258.0,2461347.8854,12.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J084539.23-304258.0 20261103.3854 12.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.77650925 12.02.2026 06:38:00.399 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
First image: 2461083.77650925 12.02.2026 06:38:00.399 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Last image: 2461347.88574862 03.11.2026 09:15:18.681 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 17
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.88
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19543
Objects passed selection criteria: 19484
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16108.8
Average stars matched: 15642.8 (97.1072 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 244336 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 03:20:26 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.77650925 12.02.2026 06:38:00.399 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
First image: 2461083.77650925 12.02.2026 06:38:00.399 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Last image: 2461347.88574862 03.11.2026 09:15:18.681 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 151
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 42 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 159609
Objects passed selection criteria: 159224
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 121194
Average stars matched: 116555 (96.1718 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 622392 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 03:22:08 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.88511043
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:38:24.548 -26:00:00.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Image size: 944.9'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:38:20.771 -26:02:22.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:38:24.548 -26:00:00.56
Second-epoch image center 08:38:20.771 -26:02:22.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0419 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Image size: 944.7'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:38:23.146 -26:01:50.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:38:24.548 -26:00:00.56
Second-epoch image center 08:38:23.146 -26:01:50.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0309 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:38:20.771 -26:02:22.62
Second-epoch second image center 08:38:23.146 -26:01:50.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01264 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M7lZS26dg5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P1AgfLn8Eq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w1zrDspCOs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ON8rObh620
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 20684 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 120.6657 to 138.8815 deg, Dec -31.3521 to -20.3049 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 120.6657 to 138.8815 deg, Dec -31.3521 to -20.3049 deg
Loaded 21147 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13472 out of 14354 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14354 out of 20684 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.804600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.804600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.88
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 20684 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 120.6657 to 138.8815 deg, Dec -31.3521 to -20.3049 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 120.6657 to 138.8815 deg, Dec -31.3521 to -20.3049 deg
Loaded 21147 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13472 out of 14354 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14354 out of 20684 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 20595 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 120.6658 to 138.8575 deg, Dec -31.3444 to -20.3050 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 120.6658 to 138.8575 deg, Dec -31.3444 to -20.3050 deg
Loaded 21116 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13488 out of 14371 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14371 out of 20595 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
2.3 pix Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
3.6 pix fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
3.6 pix fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
14.9 mag. Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.M7lZS26dg5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1778, bad_region=0, passed=20684
Got 20684 stars (including 18878 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20684 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4862 stars left (next iteration limit 5348)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=707 n_q2=1432 n_q3=1000 n_q4=1723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4862 N_valid=4862 bias_ra_arcsec=0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.297 p95_sep_arcsec=1.339 n_q1=707 n_q2=1432 n_q3=1000 n_q4=1723 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.P1AgfLn8Eq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits' -> 'wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1792, bad_region=0, passed=20595
Got 20595 stars (including 18776 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20595 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5351)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=710 n_q2=1444 n_q3=978 n_q4=1732 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4864 N_valid=4864 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.000 median_sep_arcsec=0.301 p95_sep_arcsec=1.508 n_q1=710 n_q2=1444 n_q3=978 n_q4=1732 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits -region wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.w1zrDspCOs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=512, bad_region=0, passed=11691
Got 11691 stars (including 11174 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11691 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4847 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 4850 stars left (next iteration limit 5331)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=6.815 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.789 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.810 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=0.989 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.588 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.118 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=0.637 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.012 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.846 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4850 robust_rms_before=2.207 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.620 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.637 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.978 worst_region_rms_after=1.012 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.748 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.846
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.978 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.978 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.620 arcsec matched=4850
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits N_match=4850 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.721 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.773 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.557 n_q1=1774 n_q2=730 n_q3=1628 n_q4=718 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.293
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4850 N_valid=4850 bias_ra_arcsec=0.912 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.418 median_sep_arcsec=1.837 p95_sep_arcsec=5.811 n_q1=1774 n_q2=730 n_q3=1628 n_q4=718 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits -region wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ON8rObh620 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=520, bad_region=0, passed=11824
Got 11824 stars (including 11296 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11824 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 4847 stars left (next iteration limit 5335)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4847 robust_rms=7.022 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.755 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.569 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4847 robust_rms=0.829 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.596 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.976 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4847 robust_rms=0.615 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.894 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.829 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4847 robust_rms_before=2.289 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.607 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.615 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.024 worst_region_rms_after=0.894 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.597 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.829
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.sip_refit.pi3CE6/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.sip_refit.pi3CE6/candidate.fits
Image size: 945.3'x627.4' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:38:23.244 -26:01:52.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11824 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.sip_refit.pi3CE6/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_3606212.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.sip_refit.pi3CE6/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.bYrvAW' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_3606212.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 2.289 -> 0.615 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.1 arcsec, 4847 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4591 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4591 pairs (4847 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4591 robust_rms=6.658 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.712 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.129 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4591 robust_rms=0.808 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.586 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.921 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4591 robust_rms=0.599 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.872 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.792 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4591 robust_rms_before=0.599 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.599 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.599 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.873 worst_region_rms_after=0.872 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.789 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.792
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.sip_refit.mkalRD/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.sip_refit.mkalRD/candidate.fits
Image size: 945.3'x627.4' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:38:23.244 -26:01:52.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11824 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.sip_refit.mkalRD/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_3609527.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.sip_refit.mkalRD/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.d8yCVS' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_3609527.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.599 -> 0.599 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4591 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4591 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits N_match=4591 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.706 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.888 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.565 n_q1=1654 n_q2=705 n_q3=1544 n_q4=688 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.513
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4591 N_valid=4591 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.006 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.471 p95_sep_arcsec=1.505 n_q1=1654 n_q2=705 n_q3=1544 n_q4=688 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits -region wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.132
ref2=Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.098
new1=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits sigma_overall=0.598 worst_q_ratio=1.293
new2=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits sigma_overall=0.587 worst_q_ratio=1.513
reference average sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.115
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4862 matched stars from wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_astrometric_residuals.png (4864 matched stars from wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425_astrometric_residuals.png (4850 matched stars from wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.57 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426_astrometric_residuals.png (4591 matched stars from wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Pyx-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:08:47.84 -21:56:33.2: 11.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:11:30.76 -27:33:00.3: 11.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:33:48.35 -23:26:06.7: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:08:47.84 -21:56:33.2: 11.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:11:30.76 -27:33:00.3: 11.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:11:30.76 -27:33:00.3: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4492 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:08:47.84 -21:56:33.2: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7486 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:33:48.35 -23:26:06.7: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:33:48.35 -23:26:06.7: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4355 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04377.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31380_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 31380_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31477_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 31477_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:40.41 -28:36:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31550_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 31550_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:15:30.37 -24:59:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31588_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 31588_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:37:35.59 -25:44:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31634_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 31634_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:00.24 -23:54:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31644_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 31644_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:52:54.36 -29:33:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31675_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 31675_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:18:04.00 -28:21:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31683_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 31683_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:19.39 -29:56:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31689_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 31689_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:27:13.25 -26:15:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31774_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 31774_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30586_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 30586_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:46:05.64 -27:45:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04377_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
Preparing report for the candidate 04377_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18908_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 18908_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:30.80 -30:09:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08341_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 08341_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:49.93 -25:36:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05659_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 05659_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:03:53.12 -23:49:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Pyx-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
08:33:48.35 -23:26:06.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:38:24.548 -26:00:00.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Image size: 944.9'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:38:20.771 -26:02:22.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:38:24.548 -26:00:00.56
Second-epoch image center 08:38:20.771 -26:02:22.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0419 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Image size: 945.3'x627.4' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:38:23.244 -26:01:52.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:38:24.548 -26:00:00.56
Second-epoch image center 08:38:23.244 -26:01:52.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0314 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:38:20.771 -26:02:22.62
Second-epoch second image center 08:38:23.244 -26:01:52.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01256 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EhR7xnjWhh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b39KtgfJqe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hQd8CSiuJp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7TGyDJJh3L
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 173073 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 120.6579 to 138.9421 deg, Dec -31.3553 to -20.2730 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 120.6579 to 138.9421 deg, Dec -31.3553 to -20.2730 deg
Loaded 21262 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13504 out of 17520 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17520 out of 173073 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.669450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.669450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.05
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.05
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 173073 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 120.6579 to 138.9421 deg, Dec -31.3553 to -20.2730 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 120.6579 to 138.9421 deg, Dec -31.3553 to -20.2730 deg
Loaded 21262 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13504 out of 17520 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17520 out of 173073 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 173827 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 120.6583 to 138.9424 deg, Dec -31.3481 to -20.2554 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 120.6583 to 138.9424 deg, Dec -31.3481 to -20.2554 deg
Loaded 21271 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13462 out of 17502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17502 out of 173827 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 129 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
2.1 pix Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
3.5 pix fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
3.5 pix fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
15.1 mag. Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.EhR7xnjWhh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=57, blended=19220, bad_region=0, passed=173016
Got 173016 stars (including 153511 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173016 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=776 n_q2=1357 n_q3=1075 n_q4=1667 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4875 N_valid=4875 bias_ra_arcsec=0.016 bias_dec_arcsec=0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.291 p95_sep_arcsec=1.247 n_q1=776 n_q2=1357 n_q3=1075 n_q4=1667 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.b39KtgfJqe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits' -> 'wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=19271, bad_region=3, passed=173782
Got 173782 stars (including 154242 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173782 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=780 n_q2=1363 n_q3=1062 n_q4=1671 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.080
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4876 N_valid=4876 bias_ra_arcsec=0.013 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.297 p95_sep_arcsec=1.384 n_q1=780 n_q2=1363 n_q3=1062 n_q4=1671 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits -region wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hQd8CSiuJp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=5419, bad_region=24, passed=69758
Got 69758 stars (including 64228 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69758 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5336)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=7.154 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.523 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.336 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=0.998 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.586 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.140 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=0.632 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.994 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.861 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4852 robust_rms_before=2.224 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.605 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.632 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.963 worst_region_rms_after=0.994 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.848 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.861
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.963 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.963 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.605 arcsec matched=4852
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits N_match=4852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.700 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.790 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.521 n_q1=1751 n_q2=714 n_q3=1631 n_q4=756 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.343
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4852 N_valid=4852 bias_ra_arcsec=0.918 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.464 median_sep_arcsec=1.841 p95_sep_arcsec=5.777 n_q1=1751 n_q2=714 n_q3=1631 n_q4=756 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits -region wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7TGyDJJh3L (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=5505, bad_region=25, passed=71364
Got 71364 stars (including 65752 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71364 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=7.356 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.634 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.773 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.828 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.609 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.987 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.610 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.890 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.825 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4855 robust_rms_before=0.614 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.588 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.610 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.891 worst_region_rms_after=0.890 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.834 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.825
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.891 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.891 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.588 arcsec matched=4855
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.688 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.697 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.510 n_q1=1730 n_q2=725 n_q3=1643 n_q4=757 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4855 N_valid=4855 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.010 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.014 median_sep_arcsec=0.489 p95_sep_arcsec=2.578 n_q1=1730 n_q2=725 n_q3=1643 n_q4=757 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits -region wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-14-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_031616_TTUQ1b1x1_3441777_oynebeW7/wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Pyx-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:34:54.61 -24:45:49.6: 13.71 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:17:06.13 -22:54:49.5: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:50:22.75 -28:26:36.5: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:06:15.26 -24:38:01.5: 13.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:13:18.25 -30:13:59.6: 9.50 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:50:22.75 -28:26:36.5: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:34:54.61 -24:45:49.6: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:06:15.26 -24:38:01.5: 13.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:17:06.13 -22:54:49.5: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:34:54.61 -24:45:49.6: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6466 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:50:22.75 -28:26:36.5: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4203 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:06:15.26 -24:38:01.5: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0851 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:17:06.13 -22:54:49.5: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6943 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:10:15.18 -30:25:48.2: 10.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:13:18.25 -30:13:59.6: 9.51 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.50 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:13:18.25 -30:13:59.6: ref_mag=9.50 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8014 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:10:26.21 -30:30:21.0: 10.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:02:47.67 -30:31:38.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:10:15.18 -30:25:48.2: 10.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:10:15.18 -30:25:48.2: ref_mag=10.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.5857 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:13:26.92 -30:05:22.5: 10.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:08:20.85 -30:41:32.7: 11.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:10:48.12 -30:16:04.2: 10.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:02:47.67 -30:31:38.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:02:47.67 -30:31:38.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:10:26.21 -30:30:21.0: 10.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.71 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:10:26.21 -30:30:21.0: ref_mag=10.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7139 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:07:54.77 -30:49:06.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:08:20.85 -30:41:32.7: 10.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:13:26.92 -30:05:22.5: 10.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:10:48.12 -30:16:04.2: 10.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.59 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:08:20.85 -30:41:32.7: ref_mag=10.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0112 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:13:26.92 -30:05:22.5: ref_mag=10.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0323 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:10:48.12 -30:16:04.2: ref_mag=10.59 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9540 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:07:54.77 -30:49:06.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:07:54.77 -30:49:06.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:13:19.21 -29:53:40.7: 11.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:11:50.23 -30:00:43.0: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:13:19.21 -29:53:40.7: 11.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:13:19.21 -29:53:40.7: ref_mag=11.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5846 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:11:50.23 -30:00:43.0: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:11:50.23 -30:00:43.0: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7477 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:13:32.83 -30:13:22.9: 11.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:13:06.01 -30:07:54.7: 11.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:05:41.40 -30:45:42.2: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:31:43.20 -23:31:41.3: 12.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:13:32.83 -30:13:22.9: 11.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:13:32.83 -30:13:22.9: ref_mag=11.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8359 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:13:06.01 -30:07:54.7: 11.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:13:06.01 -30:07:54.7: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9313 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:05:41.40 -30:45:42.2: 12.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:05:41.40 -30:45:42.2: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1774 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:31:43.20 -23:31:41.3: 12.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:31:43.20 -23:31:41.3: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7834 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:12:41.42 -29:57:26.1: 12.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:43:24.93 -30:06:03.6: 14.60 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:11:58.75 -30:01:47.1: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:12:41.42 -29:57:26.1: 12.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:12:41.42 -29:57:26.1: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3857 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:43:24.93 -30:06:03.6: 14.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:43:24.93 -30:06:03.6: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=12.8638 delta=1.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:11:58.75 -30:01:47.1: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:11:58.75 -30:01:47.1: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2993 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:32:59.77 -25:47:30.3: 14.00 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:37:19.62 -29:29:51.2: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:10:36.19 -28:59:39.9: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:32:59.77 -25:47:30.3: 14.07 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:32:59.77 -25:47:30.3: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.9676 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:37:19.62 -29:29:51.2: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:37:19.62 -29:29:51.2: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2248 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:39:42.91 -26:40:48.5: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:10:36.19 -28:59:39.9: 12.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:10:36.19 -28:59:39.9: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2217 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:13:28.71 -30:22:20.3: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:39:42.91 -26:40:48.5: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:39:42.91 -26:40:48.5: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1272 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:13:28.71 -30:22:20.3: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:13:28.71 -30:22:20.3: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6257 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:40:08.29 -30:06:07.1: 12.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:40:08.29 -30:06:07.1: 12.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:40:08.29 -30:06:07.1: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.9670 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:32:03.70 -24:51:17.2: 13.85 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:23:58.34 -27:08:36.2: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:32:03.70 -24:51:17.2: 13.83 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:32:03.70 -24:51:17.2: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8716 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:23:58.34 -27:08:36.2: 13.92 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:23:58.34 -27:08:36.2: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.8758 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:47:09.92 -23:01:06.3: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:47:09.92 -23:01:06.3: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:47:09.92 -23:01:06.3: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7257 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:53:49.20 -25:09:04.3: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:53:49.20 -25:09:04.3: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:53:49.20 -25:09:04.3: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2101 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:07:32.45 -26:56:24.1: 13.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:07:32.45 -26:56:24.1: 13.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 09:07:32.45 -26:56:24.1: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4823 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:15:22.94 -29:43:46.3: 10.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:15:22.94 -29:43:46.3: 10.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:15:22.94 -29:43:46.3: ref_mag=10.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.0536 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:45:39.15 -30:42:58.1: 13.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:45:39.15 -30:42:58.1: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:45:39.15 -30:42:58.1: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3060 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101762.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out107176.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out126044.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out129184.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out158200.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out168707.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out200713.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34184.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out61432.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out71019.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78084.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out95213.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 54s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198686_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 198686_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198692_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 198692_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:22:25.71 -23:09:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198710_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 198710_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198713_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 198713_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198718_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 198718_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:22.57 -22:41:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198727_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 198727_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198731_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 198731_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198732_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 198732_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:38.64 -27:21:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198737_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 198737_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:21:28.17 -30:18:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198742_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 198742_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:48.74 -24:49:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198755_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 198755_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:25:06.74 -24:02:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198795_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 198795_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:08:36.87 -30:32:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198898_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 198898_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:14.64 -29:55:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198909_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 198909_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198992_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 198992_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:11:10.75 -30:08:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198993_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 198993_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:19.50 -29:47:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199007_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199007_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:11:29.42 -30:14:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199062_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199062_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:34.36 -30:12:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199080_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199080_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:11:16.11 -30:36:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199096_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199096_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199106_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199106_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:11:38.92 -30:25:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199129_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199129_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199218_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199218_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:26.83 -30:16:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199230_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199230_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:13:23.13 -29:59:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199255_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199255_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199257_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199257_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199278_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199278_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:13:11.65 -29:45:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199291_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199291_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199300_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199300_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199339_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199339_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:11:07.07 -30:30:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199354_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199354_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199381_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199381_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199406_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199406_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:11:17.29 -30:02:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199419_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199419_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:11:50.62 -30:05:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199606_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199606_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:30.56 -30:05:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199628_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199628_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:10:21.99 -30:30:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199656_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199656_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:58.03 -30:38:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199675_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199675_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:11:45.52 -30:27:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199695_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199695_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199712_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199712_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:00.35 -30:24:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199729_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199729_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:11:02.33 -30:34:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199742_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199742_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:08:16.46 -30:48:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199753_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199753_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:10:38.45 -30:12:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199794_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199794_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199803_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199803_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:00.22 -30:16:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199812_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199812_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:25:04.61 -24:04:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199821_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199821_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:25:06.56 -24:05:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199838_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199838_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:06.43 -29:59:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199872_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199872_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:37:51.16 -26:17:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199879_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199879_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:09:37.28 -30:28:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199881_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199881_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:07:37.26 -30:44:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199949_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 199949_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200004_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200004_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:23.13 -28:15:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200031_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200031_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:09.97 -30:18:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200066_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200066_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:08:29.05 -22:23:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200134_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200134_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200147_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200147_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:50.12 -30:24:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200170_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200170_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200192_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200192_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:27:30.53 -20:49:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200229_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200229_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:30:22.27 -26:03:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200260_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200260_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:17:41.46 -25:00:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200280_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200280_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200282_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200282_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200326_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200326_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:39:53.04 -23:48:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200329_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200329_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:54.07 -21:36:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200338_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200338_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:27.59 -29:57:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200352_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200352_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:16:27.94 -22:05:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200385_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200385_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:11:29.11 -30:39:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200411_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200411_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:08:06.81 -30:38:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200461_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200461_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:03:30.57 -30:55:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200519_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200519_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:31.98 -21:57:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200528_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200528_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:23.09 -27:08:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200554_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200554_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:23:25.92 -22:50:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200561_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200561_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200656_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200656_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:06.55 -25:05:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200713_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
Preparing report for the candidate 200713_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200737_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200737_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200748_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 200748_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:18.89 -29:35:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115979_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 115979_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:46:05.64 -27:45:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149500_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 149500_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:18:04.01 -28:21:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170691_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 170691_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:19.39 -29:56:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56562_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 56562_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:35:58.88 -24:31:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116437_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 116437_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:15.94 -27:56:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78084_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
Preparing report for the candidate 78084_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129184_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
Preparing report for the candidate 129184_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128895_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 128895_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153813_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 153813_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:11:04.53 -30:32:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121290_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 121290_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:44:17.29 -28:06:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95213_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
Preparing report for the candidate 95213_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05908_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 05908_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:39:41.71 -21:08:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14224_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 14224_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:00:59.98 -21:28:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85878_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 85878_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:27:13.31 -26:15:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186071_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 186071_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70211_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 70211_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:35:39.19 -25:18:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168707_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
Preparing report for the candidate 168707_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102029_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 102029_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:58:35.55 -26:48:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124901_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 124901_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:44.24 -29:48:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144680_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 144680_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:40.37 -28:36:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61432_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
Preparing report for the candidate 61432_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42733_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 42733_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:15:10.89 -23:45:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101762_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
Preparing report for the candidate 101762_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10581_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 10581_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34184_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
Preparing report for the candidate 34184_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63175_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 63175_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:15:30.38 -24:59:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125952_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 125952_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:59.04 -29:06:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152958_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 152958_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:07:03.53 -30:40:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71019_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
Preparing report for the candidate 71019_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46277_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 46277_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:00.24 -23:54:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77780_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 77780_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:37:35.61 -25:44:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168955_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 168955_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:30.81 -30:09:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159241_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 159241_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:45.29 -30:45:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125352_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 125352_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:52:54.35 -29:33:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66436_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 66436_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:32:09.55 -25:08:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39289_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 39289_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:48.32 -23:26:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107176_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
Preparing report for the candidate 107176_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51595_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 51595_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:03:53.12 -23:49:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77334_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 77334_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:49.92 -25:36:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126044_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
Preparing report for the candidate 126044_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153262_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 153262_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:09:38.23 -30:37:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24562_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 24562_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:54:12.86 -22:18:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137407_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 137407_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:49:16.72 -28:53:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158200_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
Preparing report for the candidate 158200_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118530_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 118530_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:50:31.37 -27:42:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123079_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 123079_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:48:14.44 -28:38:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173022_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 173022_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:39:42.42 -29:33:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118762_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 118762_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:55:31.41 -27:40:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127260_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 127260_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:50:02.08 -29:27:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166779_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 166779_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:13:21.42 -29:39:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90384_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426
The candidate 90384_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-15-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks
