This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3132 2461347.8132 11.35 03:24:00.54 +20:45:15.9
164.52216 -29.53449 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.64 Angelina -1 -1 1 11.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:24:00.54 +20:45:15.9: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:24:00.54 +20:45:15.9: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3132* 03 24 00.54 +20 45 15.9 11.3 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8132,11.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3132 11.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3132 2461347.8132 12.38 03:55:35.98 +23:54:15.2
168.28597 -22.33528 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.83 Beatrix -0 -0 0 12.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:55:35.98 +23:54:15.2: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:55:35.98 +23:54:15.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3132* 03 55 35.98 +23 54 15.2 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8132,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3132 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3132 2461347.8132 13.96 03:29:32.77 +24:31:44.2
162.95564 -25.79888 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.859 Bouzareah -0 -0 0 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:32.77 +24:31:44.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:32.77 +24:31:44.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3132* 03 29 32.77 +24 31 44.2 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8132,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3132 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3132 2461347.8132 14.53 03:40:59.92 +18:12:23.5
169.89454 -28.81235 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1576 Fabiola -0 -1 1 15.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:59.92 +18:12:23.5: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:59.92 +18:12:23.5: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3132* 03 40 59.92 +18 12 23.5 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8132,14.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3132 14.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3132 2461347.8132 14.54 03:26:55.61 +24:00:09.1
162.80503 -26.58325 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.228 Agathe -0 -0 0 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:55.61 +24:00:09.1: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:55.61 +24:00:09.1: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3132* 03 26 55.61 +24 00 09.1 14.5 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8132,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3132 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3132 2461347.8132 14.95 03:25:14.16 +18:42:48.3
166.28750 -30.92112 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 8.6 pix
The object was found in VSX13" CSS_J032513.8+184238
Type: EW
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.360 CV Y 0.230 CV 0.263536000000 G7
The object was found in astcheck.1202 Marina -1 -2 2 15.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:14.16 +18:42:48.3: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:14.16 +18:42:48.3: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3132* 03 25 14.16 +18 42 48.3 14.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CSS_J032513.8+184238,2461347.8132,14.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CSS_J032513.8+184238 20261103.3132 14.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3132 2461347.8132 15.10 03:58:54.92 +20:27:33.4
171.51559 -24.24800 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2962 Otto 0 1 1 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:58:54.92 +20:27:33.4: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:58:54.92 +20:27:33.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3132* 03 58 54.92 +20 27 33.4 15.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8132,15.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3132 15.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461347.81357272 03.11.2026 07:31:22.683 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11111
Objects passed selection criteria: 11067
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8879.25
Average stars matched: 8080.25 (91.0015 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235996 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 02:29:33 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461347.81357272 03.11.2026 07:31:22.683 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 92
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.94
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 68518
Objects passed selection criteria: 68306
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 56132.8
Average stars matched: 51056.8 (90.9572 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 285224 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 02:31:15 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.81288565
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.031 +21:59:49.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:32.031 +21:59:49.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0049 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:34.923 +21:59:19.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:34.923 +21:59:19.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0110 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:32.031 +21:59:49.14
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:34.923 +21:59:19.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01381 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eqljZmlg9r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aS5TA7T20T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eqwslCllMx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a4R1K1o3bw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.5175 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.5175 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4761 out of 5130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5130 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.eqljZmlg9r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=2358, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 8232 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4928 stars left (next iteration limit 5420)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=1932 n_q2=884 n_q3=1338 n_q4=774 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4928 N_valid=4928 bias_ra_arcsec=0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.009 median_sep_arcsec=0.249 p95_sep_arcsec=0.801 n_q1=1932 n_q2=884 n_q3=1338 n_q4=774 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aS5TA7T20T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=2356, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 8229 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4927 stars left (next iteration limit 5419)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.244 n_q1=1928 n_q2=891 n_q3=1332 n_q4=776 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4927 N_valid=4927 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.013 median_sep_arcsec=0.262 p95_sep_arcsec=0.822 n_q1=1928 n_q2=891 n_q3=1332 n_q4=776 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.eqwslCllMx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=761, bad_region=2528, passed=11432
Got 11432 stars (including 8281 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11432 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9516 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9516 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9516 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4927 stars left (next iteration limit 5417)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=7.625 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.822 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.822 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=0.437 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.985 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.985 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=0.327 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.458 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.458 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4927 robust_rms_before=1.196 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.333 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.327 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.484 worst_region_rms_after=0.458 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.032 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.458
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.484 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.484 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.333 arcsec matched=4927
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits N_match=4927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=1368 n_q2=834 n_q3=1463 n_q4=1262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.061
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4927 N_valid=4927 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.375 bias_dec_arcsec=0.938 median_sep_arcsec=1.151 p95_sep_arcsec=1.822 n_q1=1368 n_q2=834 n_q3=1463 n_q4=1262 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.a4R1K1o3bw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=758, bad_region=2519, passed=11395
Got 11395 stars (including 8258 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11395 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4926 stars left (next iteration limit 5416)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4926 robust_rms=7.587 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.628 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.628 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4926 robust_rms=0.453 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.004 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.004 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4926 robust_rms=0.333 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.447 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.447 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4926 robust_rms_before=1.166 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.333 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.477 worst_region_rms_after=0.447 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.055 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.447
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.477 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.477 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.343 arcsec matched=4926
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits N_match=4926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.388 n_q1=1364 n_q2=837 n_q3=1469 n_q4=1256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4926 N_valid=4926 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.366 bias_dec_arcsec=0.903 median_sep_arcsec=1.125 p95_sep_arcsec=1.782 n_q1=1364 n_q2=837 n_q3=1469 n_q4=1256 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.300 worst_q_ratio=1.268
ref2=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.303
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits sigma_overall=0.352 worst_q_ratio=1.061
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.074
reference average sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.2855
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (4928 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (4927 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420_astrometric_residuals.png (4927 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421_astrometric_residuals.png (4926 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:55:35.98 +23:54:15.2: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:04.51 +21:12:57.3: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:13.14 +22:06:37.3: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:27.93 +20:05:27.5: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:24:00.54 +20:45:15.9: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:34.47 +19:39:33.7: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:54.02 +22:37:08.2: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:03.93 +22:50:50.2: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:03.93 +22:50:50.2: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:55:35.98 +23:54:15.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:27.93 +20:05:27.5: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:34.47 +19:39:33.7: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:54.02 +22:37:08.2: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:04.51 +21:12:57.3: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:24:00.54 +20:45:15.9: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:13.14 +22:06:37.3: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:03.93 +22:50:50.2: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3864 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:27.93 +20:05:27.5: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2969 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:34.47 +19:39:33.7: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2721 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:04.51 +21:12:57.3: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4329 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:54.02 +22:37:08.2: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4315 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:13.14 +22:06:37.3: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4591 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21216.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22111.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 38s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20928_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 20928_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:09.77 +24:29:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21216_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 21216_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21956_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 21956_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21972_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 21972_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22078_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 22078_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22111_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 22111_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22131_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 22131_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22148_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 22148_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22177_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 22177_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 40s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
03:24:00.54 +20:45:15.9
03:55:35.98 +23:54:15.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.031 +21:59:49.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:32.031 +21:59:49.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0049 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:34.923 +21:59:19.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:34.923 +21:59:19.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0110 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:32.031 +21:59:49.14
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:34.923 +21:59:19.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01381 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lkfz9HT9ua
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E9nxEPWfEI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qvq2a7AJ8R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2f9r17YgXE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.4774 to +27.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.4774 to 27.2939 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4354 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 71179 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.803800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.803800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.94
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.4774 to +27.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.4774 to 27.2939 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4354 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 71179 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 71492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6157 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4359 out of 5185 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5185 out of 71492 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 69 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.9 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.8 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
15.8 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.8 (SNR ) 14.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lkfz9HT9ua (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4312, bad_region=11991, passed=71162
Got 71162 stars (including 55414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71162 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4935 stars left (next iteration limit 5428)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.232 n_q1=1851 n_q2=887 n_q3=1408 n_q4=789 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4935 N_valid=4935 bias_ra_arcsec=0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.240 p95_sep_arcsec=0.774 n_q1=1851 n_q2=887 n_q3=1408 n_q4=789 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.E9nxEPWfEI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4374, bad_region=12029, passed=71479
Got 71479 stars (including 55644 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71479 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4930 stars left (next iteration limit 5423)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=1847 n_q2=888 n_q3=1401 n_q4=794 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4930 N_valid=4930 bias_ra_arcsec=0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.009 median_sep_arcsec=0.251 p95_sep_arcsec=0.813 n_q1=1847 n_q2=888 n_q3=1401 n_q4=794 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qvq2a7AJ8R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=3826, bad_region=12314, passed=65852
Got 65852 stars (including 50457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65852 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=7.653 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.742 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.742 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.429 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.026 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.026 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.320 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.460 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.460 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4918 robust_rms_before=1.175 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.325 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.320 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.478 worst_region_rms_after=0.460 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.045 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.460
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.478 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.478 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.325 arcsec matched=4918
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1387 n_q2=869 n_q3=1464 n_q4=1198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.057
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4918 N_valid=4918 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.377 bias_dec_arcsec=0.919 median_sep_arcsec=1.127 p95_sep_arcsec=1.796 n_q1=1387 n_q2=869 n_q3=1464 n_q4=1198 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2f9r17YgXE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=3818, bad_region=12383, passed=65987
Got 65987 stars (including 50533 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65987 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5404)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=7.587 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.572 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.572 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=0.446 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.012 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.012 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=0.325 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.451 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.451 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4913 robust_rms_before=1.147 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.335 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.325 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.471 worst_region_rms_after=0.451 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.057 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.451
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.471 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.471 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.335 arcsec matched=4913
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=1401 n_q2=865 n_q3=1468 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4913 N_valid=4913 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.371 bias_dec_arcsec=0.887 median_sep_arcsec=1.104 p95_sep_arcsec=1.760 n_q1=1401 n_q2=865 n_q3=1468 n_q4=1179 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0420.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_022419_TTUQ2b1x1_2290609_j17WAqpi/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:00:23.78 +19:50:59.0: 14.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:55:46.21 +26:10:58.4: 14.76 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:40.45 +22:18:47.3: 15.15 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:21.08 +24:51:58.4: 14.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:27.83 +17:46:09.1: 14.82 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:48.82 +26:02:34.2: 15.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:41:46.91 +20:40:19.6: 15.44 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:47:41.88 +25:15:25.6: 14.87 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:54:04.93 +24:58:33.6: 15.14 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:33:00.76 +26:05:50.9: 14.70 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:40.45 +22:18:47.3: 15.19 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:48.82 +26:02:34.2: 15.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:00:23.78 +19:50:59.0: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:21.08 +24:51:58.4: 15.09 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:41:46.91 +20:40:19.6: 15.40 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:27.83 +17:46:09.1: 14.82 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:55:46.21 +26:10:58.4: 14.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:47:41.88 +25:15:25.6: 14.90 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:54:04.93 +24:58:33.6: 15.39 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:40.45 +22:18:47.3: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0106 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:48.82 +26:02:34.2: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9996 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:21.08 +24:51:58.4: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0497 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:46.91 +20:40:19.6: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1915 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:41.88 +25:15:25.6: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9866 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:27.83 +17:46:09.1: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7444 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:46.21 +26:10:58.4: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8514 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:23.78 +19:50:59.0: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.7401 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:04.93 +24:58:33.6: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.2021 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:33:00.76 +26:05:50.9: 14.57 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:33:00.76 +26:05:50.9: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5968 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:09.21 +20:36:20.2: 14.58 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:56.67 +23:39:43.4: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:34.91 +18:31:41.7: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:52.23 +18:47:14.9: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:10.48 +20:15:11.7: 14.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:58:41.78 +23:51:22.2: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:32.77 +24:31:44.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:56.67 +23:39:43.4: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:34.91 +18:31:41.7: 14.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:56.67 +23:39:43.4: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2331 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:09.21 +20:36:20.2: 14.67 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:34.91 +18:31:41.7: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3393 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:09.21 +20:36:20.2: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6167 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:43.16 +25:03:01.9: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:31:25.07 +24:45:30.2: 14.52 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:10.48 +20:15:11.7: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:52.23 +18:47:14.9: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:10.48 +20:15:11.7: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2061 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:58:41.78 +23:51:22.2: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:52.23 +18:47:14.9: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9784 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:41.78 +23:51:22.2: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2947 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:32.77 +24:31:44.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:27.12 +18:35:15.5: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:43.16 +25:03:01.9: 14.52 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:43.16 +25:03:01.9: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3482 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:31:25.07 +24:45:30.2: 14.93 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:25.07 +24:45:30.2: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5420 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:55.61 +24:00:09.1: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:59.92 +18:12:23.5: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:52.78 +21:09:08.3: 14.56 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:27.12 +18:35:15.5: 14.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:27.12 +18:35:15.5: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4438 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:54:25.80 +18:37:00.7: 14.47 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:59:32.58 +22:13:08.8: 14.97 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:10.84 +23:00:51.8: 14.89 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:59.92 +18:12:23.5: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:55.61 +24:00:09.1: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:52.78 +21:09:08.3: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:52.78 +21:09:08.3: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5188 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:35:26.88 +26:08:04.6: 14.88 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:35:58.67 +19:20:41.5: 14.90 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:59:32.58 +22:13:08.8: 14.90 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:10.84 +23:00:51.8: 14.88 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:54:25.80 +18:37:00.7: 14.52 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:32.58 +22:13:08.8: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6242 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:10.84 +23:00:51.8: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8101 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:25.80 +18:37:00.7: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5346 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:35:26.88 +26:08:04.6: 15.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:35:26.88 +26:08:04.6: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8351 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:38:07.14 +19:22:49.7: 15.00 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:35:58.67 +19:20:41.5: 15.00 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:35:58.67 +19:20:41.5: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7544 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:27:53.59 +25:57:26.9: 15.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:38:07.14 +19:22:49.7: 15.22 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:07.14 +19:22:49.7: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8029 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:47.32 +23:40:35.0: 15.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:14.16 +18:42:48.3: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:43:54.04 +22:17:58.7: 14.83 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:27:53.59 +25:57:26.9: 15.33 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:27:53.59 +25:57:26.9: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9455 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:47:09.48 +23:44:30.1: 14.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:39.53 +24:58:34.3: 15.02 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:43:54.04 +22:17:58.7: 14.84 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:14.16 +18:42:48.3: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:47.32 +23:40:35.0: 15.06 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:54.04 +22:17:58.7: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=15.0379 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:47.32 +23:40:35.0: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0317 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:47:09.48 +23:44:30.1: 15.21 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:09.48 +23:44:30.1: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9823 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:39.53 +24:58:34.3: 15.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:39.53 +24:58:34.3: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9124 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:24.76 +24:46:04.3: 14.99 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:32.55 +17:39:59.3: 15.67 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:16.20 +24:19:41.8: 15.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:33:01.91 +17:49:00.5: 15.22 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:24.76 +24:46:04.3: 14.90 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:24.76 +24:46:04.3: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9589 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:32.55 +17:39:59.3: 15.34 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:32.55 +17:39:59.3: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0199 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:31:06.36 +24:53:30.5: 15.35 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:52.35 +23:54:49.6: 15.37 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:33:01.91 +17:49:00.5: 15.33 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:16.20 +24:19:41.8: 15.06 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:33:01.91 +17:49:00.5: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0417 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:16.20 +24:19:41.8: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0267 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:31:06.36 +24:53:30.5: 15.30 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:52.35 +23:54:49.6: 15.48 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:06.36 +24:53:30.5: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1342 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:52.35 +23:54:49.6: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.2757 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:59.23 +20:40:11.8: 15.12 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:22:49.80 +20:33:51.9: 15.67 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:29.56 +25:34:20.1: 14.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:53:46.15 +19:59:16.1: 15.53 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:59.23 +20:40:11.8: 15.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:59.23 +20:40:11.8: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1921 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:22:49.80 +20:33:51.9: 15.53 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.59 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:49.80 +20:33:51.9: ref_mag=15.59 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9986 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:50.38 +22:06:32.7: 15.51 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:19.23 +22:50:21.1: 15.18 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:29.56 +25:34:20.1: 15.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:53:46.15 +19:59:16.1: 15.41 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:29.56 +25:34:20.1: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0146 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:46.15 +19:59:16.1: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0659 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:50.38 +22:06:32.7: 15.56 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.53 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:50.38 +22:06:32.7: ref_mag=15.53 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1571 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:19.23 +22:50:21.1: 15.20 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:19.23 +22:50:21.1: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0716 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:38:56.72 +20:24:07.9: 15.28 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:22:15.91 +22:47:38.8: 15.38 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:22.80 +21:30:41.1: 15.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:00:55.53 +25:09:57.7: 15.15 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:38:56.72 +20:24:07.9: 15.13 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:56.72 +20:24:07.9: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0139 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:37.56 +18:18:40.8: 15.42 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:05.76 +24:39:00.7: 15.62 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:00:55.53 +25:09:57.7: 15.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:22.80 +21:30:41.1: 15.11 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:22:15.91 +22:47:38.8: 15.24 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:55.53 +25:09:57.7: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0573 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:22.80 +21:30:41.1: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0951 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:15.91 +22:47:38.8: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1958 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:37.56 +18:18:40.8: 15.76 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:37.56 +18:18:40.8: ref_mag=15.55 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1980 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:05.76 +24:39:00.7: 15.31 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:05.76 +24:39:00.7: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1259 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:01:03.12 +24:12:52.1: 15.37 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:58:54.92 +20:27:33.4: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:35:22.97 +19:19:32.7: 15.55 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:01:03.12 +24:12:52.1: 15.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:03.12 +24:12:52.1: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0956 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:58:54.92 +20:27:33.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:35:22.97 +19:19:32.7: 15.71 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.62 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:35:22.97 +19:19:32.7: ref_mag=15.62 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.2259 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91205.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out93953.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94064.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out96037.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out97329.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 87s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86082_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 86082_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86091_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 86091_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86092_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 86092_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86093_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 86093_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86098_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 86098_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86102_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 86102_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86107_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 86107_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86108_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 86108_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86111_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 86111_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86113_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 86113_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86116_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 86116_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86119_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 86119_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86126_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 86126_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86127_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 86127_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86607_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 86607_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:09.77 +24:29:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86885_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 86885_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:00.54 +20:45:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87776_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 87776_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:36.00 +23:54:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88322_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 88322_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:40.52 +18:47:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88430_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 88430_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:07.70 +23:38:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89473_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 89473_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:24.21 +22:45:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89533_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 89533_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:50.29 +24:29:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89969_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 89969_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:12.99 +23:36:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91205_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 91205_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91465_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 91465_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91515_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 91515_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:15.04 +24:34:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92207_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 92207_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92886_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 92886_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93093_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 93093_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93820_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 93820_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93939_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 93939_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:51.41 +24:18:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93943_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 93943_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93953_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 93953_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94030_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 94030_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94064_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 94064_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94556_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 94556_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94726_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 94726_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94753_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 94753_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95451_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 95451_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95803_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 95803_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95978_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 95978_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96029_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96029_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96037_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 96037_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96130_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96130_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96237_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96237_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96252_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96252_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96407_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96407_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96450_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96450_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96521_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96521_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96566_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96566_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96639_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96639_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96747_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96747_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96802_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96802_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96824_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96824_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96842_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96842_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96846_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96846_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96892_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96892_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96918_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96918_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96929_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96929_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96970_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96970_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96974_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 96974_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97025_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 97025_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97045_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 97045_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97064_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 97064_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97106_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 97106_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97163_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 97163_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97174_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 97174_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97199_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 97199_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97329_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 97329_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23701_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421
The candidate 23701_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0421 did not pass the final checks
