This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3016 2461347.8016 11.80 01:26:55.31 +30:47:47.0
131.86558 -31.45908 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.375 Ursula -1 0 1 12.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:26:55.31 +30:47:47.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:26:55.31 +30:47:47.0: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8016,11.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3016 11.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3016 2461347.8016 12.25 02:26:43.18 +25:42:43.4
148.45930 -32.39358 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.686 Gersuind -1 -0 1 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:26:43.18 +25:42:43.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:26:43.18 +25:42:43.4: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3016* 02 26 43.18 +25 42 43.4 12.2 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8016,12.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3016 12.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3016 2461347.8016 13.80 02:14:54.90 +30:04:17.1
143.65947 -29.41849 galactic Tri Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.399 Persephone -0 0 0 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:14:54.90 +30:04:17.1: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:14:54.90 +30:04:17.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3016* 02 14 54.90 +30 04 17.1 13.8 U Tri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8016,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3016 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3016 2461347.8016 14.65 02:17:12.96 +26:51:30.1
145.60568 -32.20896 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.2" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.955 Alstede -2 -2 3 15.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:17:12.96 +26:51:30.1: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:17:12.96 +26:51:30.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3016* 02 17 12.96 +26 51 30.1 14.7 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8016,14.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3016 14.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
First image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Last image: 2461347.80195234 03.11.2026 07:14:38.682 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 54
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12990
Objects passed selection criteria: 12985
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11995.5
Average stars matched: 11496.8 (95.8422 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 238152 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 01:19:40 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
First image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Last image: 2461347.80195234 03.11.2026 07:14:38.682 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 38
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.00
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 42 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 60226
Objects passed selection criteria: 60104
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 58222.2
Average stars matched: 57065 (98.0124 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 289804 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 01:21:54 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.80131214
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:00.767 +29:59:43.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:00.129 +30:00:30.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.767 +29:59:43.74
Second-epoch image center 02:00:00.129 +30:00:30.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0132 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:59:57.391 +29:59:56.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.767 +29:59:43.74
Second-epoch image center 01:59:57.391 +29:59:56.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0127 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:00:00.129 +30:00:30.35
Second-epoch second image center 01:59:57.391 +29:59:56.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01365 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v25XjSriWe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits &> /tmp/tmp.toFY7x4oI2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5DMOzAvRXv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4nmnfF2DrI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 12225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.6031 to 39.6626 deg, Dec +24.4125 to +35.2960 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.6031 to 39.6626 deg, Dec 24.4125 to 35.2960 deg
Loaded 8372 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6352 out of 6781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6781 out of 12225 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.928900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.928900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 12225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.6031 to 39.6626 deg, Dec +24.4125 to +35.2960 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.6031 to 39.6626 deg, Dec 24.4125 to 35.2960 deg
Loaded 8372 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6352 out of 6781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6781 out of 12225 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 9704 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.4683 to 39.4466 deg, Dec +24.4124 to +35.2593 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.4683 to 39.4466 deg, Dec 24.4124 to 35.2593 deg
Loaded 8305 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6209 out of 6464 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6464 out of 9704 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 52 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
2.4 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
4.7 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
4.7 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
15.3 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.v25XjSriWe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=932, bad_region=0, passed=12225
Got 12225 stars (including 11278 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12225 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4835 stars left (next iteration limit 5318)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits N_match=4835 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.239 n_q1=1307 n_q2=1363 n_q3=1097 n_q4=1068 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4835 N_valid=4835 bias_ra_arcsec=0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.230 p95_sep_arcsec=0.771 n_q1=1307 n_q2=1363 n_q3=1097 n_q4=1068 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.toFY7x4oI2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=660, bad_region=0, passed=9704
Got 9704 stars (including 9036 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9704 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4830 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4829 stars left (next iteration limit 5313)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits N_match=4829 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.476 n_q1=1048 n_q2=1135 n_q3=1321 n_q4=1325 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4829 N_valid=4829 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.007 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.012 median_sep_arcsec=0.374 p95_sep_arcsec=1.429 n_q1=1048 n_q2=1135 n_q3=1321 n_q4=1325 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5DMOzAvRXv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=627, bad_region=0, passed=13172
Got 13172 stars (including 12537 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13172 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4831 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4831 stars left (next iteration limit 5314)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=13.125 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.390 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.390 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=0.466 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.844 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.844 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=0.357 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.615 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.615 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4831 robust_rms_before=1.512 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.379 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.357 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.670 worst_region_rms_after=0.615 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.290 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.615
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.670 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.670 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.379 arcsec matched=4831
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits N_match=4831 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=1353 n_q2=1295 n_q3=1147 n_q4=1036 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4831 N_valid=4831 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.972 bias_dec_arcsec=0.824 median_sep_arcsec=1.389 p95_sep_arcsec=3.106 n_q1=1353 n_q2=1295 n_q3=1147 n_q4=1036 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4nmnfF2DrI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=654, bad_region=1, passed=13182
Got 13182 stars (including 12525 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13182 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4846 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4830 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4846 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4830 stars left (next iteration limit 5313)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=13.149 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.360 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.360 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=0.456 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.827 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.827 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=0.363 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.636 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.636 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4830 robust_rms_before=1.501 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.387 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.363 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.671 worst_region_rms_after=0.636 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.272 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.636
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.671 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.671 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.387 arcsec matched=4830
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits N_match=4830 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.362 n_q1=1349 n_q2=1297 n_q3=1148 n_q4=1036 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4830 N_valid=4830 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.961 bias_dec_arcsec=0.812 median_sep_arcsec=1.373 p95_sep_arcsec=3.039 n_q1=1349 n_q2=1297 n_q3=1148 n_q4=1036 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits sigma_overall=0.283 worst_q_ratio=1.277
ref2=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits sigma_overall=0.479 worst_q_ratio=1.063
new1=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.144
new2=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.177
reference average sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.17
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_astrometric_residuals.png (4835 matched stars from wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365_astrometric_residuals.png (4829 matched stars from wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327_astrometric_residuals.png (4831 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328_astrometric_residuals.png (4830 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:26:43.18 +25:42:43.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:06:07.09 +29:20:27.8: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:56:09.49 +31:02:25.1: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:33:17.18 +32:04:31.4: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:31:54.71 +33:33:26.6: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:06:44.59 +29:54:03.4: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:00:55.92 +31:39:05.4: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:26:55.31 +30:47:47.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:03:54.04 +33:42:59.7: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:33:17.18 +32:04:31.4: 12.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:31:54.71 +33:33:26.6: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:26:55.31 +30:47:47.0: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:06:44.59 +29:54:03.4: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:26:43.18 +25:42:43.4: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:33:17.18 +32:04:31.4: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3313 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:06:44.59 +29:54:03.4: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2968 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:06:07.09 +29:20:27.8: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:31:54.71 +33:33:26.6: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1938 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:57:00.13 +28:42:33.0: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:00:55.92 +31:39:05.4: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:03:54.04 +33:42:59.7: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:06:07.09 +29:20:27.8: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3048 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:00:55.92 +31:39:05.4: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2196 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:03:54.04 +33:42:59.7: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2736 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:56:09.49 +31:02:25.1: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:56:09.49 +31:02:25.1: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2529 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:57:00.13 +28:42:33.0: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:57:00.13 +28:42:33.0: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3079 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:09:11.27 +30:41:31.6: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:08:33.63 +30:19:40.9: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:18:50.93 +32:10:27.5: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:19:13.51 +32:25:26.9: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:58:34.02 +31:22:44.2: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:01:35.96 +29:17:11.4: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:36:35.36 +34:07:35.4: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:08:33.63 +30:19:40.9: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:09:11.27 +30:41:31.6: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:18:50.93 +32:10:27.5: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:08:33.63 +30:19:40.9: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3126 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:18:50.93 +32:10:27.5: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3316 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:09:11.27 +30:41:31.6: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3286 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:19:13.51 +32:25:26.9: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:19:13.51 +32:25:26.9: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3415 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:01:35.96 +29:17:11.4: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:58:34.02 +31:22:44.2: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:01:35.96 +29:17:11.4: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3976 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:05:43.67 +27:51:22.1: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:58:34.02 +31:22:44.2: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2894 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:36:35.36 +34:07:35.4: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:36:35.36 +34:07:35.4: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4280 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:05:43.67 +27:51:22.1: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:05:43.67 +27:51:22.1: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4316 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:06:53.77 +28:23:23.8: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:43:34.13 +32:55:48.9: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:03:53.90 +29:02:37.3: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:04:11.73 +31:59:25.6: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:04:38.54 +32:29:28.5: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:32:19.18 +28:10:38.3: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:26:18.41 +31:19:21.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:06:53.77 +28:23:23.8: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:06:53.77 +28:23:23.8: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4130 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:04:11.73 +31:59:25.6: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:43:34.13 +32:55:48.9: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:04:11.73 +31:59:25.6: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4060 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:43:34.13 +32:55:48.9: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3593 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:04:38.54 +32:29:28.5: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:04:38.54 +32:29:28.5: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4012 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:13:08.22 +29:58:21.8: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:03:53.90 +29:02:37.3: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:32:19.18 +28:10:38.3: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:03:53.90 +29:02:37.3: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4263 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:32:19.18 +28:10:38.3: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4955 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:26:18.41 +31:19:21.8: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:26:18.41 +31:19:21.8: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4600 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:13:08.22 +29:58:21.8: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:13:08.22 +29:58:21.8: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3911 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:06:54.86 +26:15:17.3: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:02:12.16 +28:13:38.4: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:07:23.67 +28:32:21.4: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:08:43.33 +30:56:42.5: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:03:18.19 +29:21:19.7: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:06:30.04 +31:35:19.4: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:02:26.39 +29:32:37.9: 12.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:06:54.86 +26:15:17.3: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:06:54.86 +26:15:17.3: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4237 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:02:12.16 +28:13:38.4: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:02:12.16 +28:13:38.4: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4411 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:07:23.67 +28:32:21.4: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:07:23.67 +28:32:21.4: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4425 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:10:27.10 +30:23:30.2: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:08:43.33 +30:56:42.5: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:08:43.33 +30:56:42.5: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4454 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:03:18.19 +29:21:19.7: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:03:18.19 +29:21:19.7: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4590 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:06:30.04 +31:35:19.4: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:06:30.04 +31:35:19.4: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4331 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:02:26.39 +29:32:37.9: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:02:26.39 +29:32:37.9: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4501 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:10:27.10 +30:23:30.2: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:10:27.10 +30:23:30.2: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4819 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:55:57.67 +31:07:53.3: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:01:41.05 +29:11:43.6: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:19:58.22 +34:28:44.3: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:56:22.30 +29:56:04.1: 12.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:03:55.28 +30:39:33.8: 12.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:02:08.57 +28:28:18.8: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:01:41.05 +29:11:43.6: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:55:57.67 +31:07:53.3: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:18:02.04 +34:06:10.4: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:55:57.67 +31:07:53.3: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4487 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:01:41.05 +29:11:43.6: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4734 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:19:58.22 +34:28:44.3: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:19:58.22 +34:28:44.3: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4671 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:00:07.22 +30:49:33.8: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:03:55.28 +30:39:33.8: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:03:55.28 +30:39:33.8: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4847 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:56:22.30 +29:56:04.1: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:56:22.30 +29:56:04.1: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4536 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:02:08.57 +28:28:18.8: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:02:08.57 +28:28:18.8: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4951 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:18:02.04 +34:06:10.4: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:18:02.04 +34:06:10.4: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4967 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:00:07.22 +30:49:33.8: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:00:07.22 +30:49:33.8: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4874 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:04:22.60 +29:35:50.8: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:02:33.58 +32:08:53.1: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:06:47.41 +30:13:49.7: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:44:31.68 +26:31:34.6: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:02:35.21 +32:53:54.3: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:34:52.13 +33:18:19.8: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:04:22.60 +29:35:50.8: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:04:22.60 +29:35:50.8: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4775 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:02:33.58 +32:08:53.1: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:06:47.41 +30:13:49.7: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:06:47.41 +30:13:49.7: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4731 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:02:33.58 +32:08:53.1: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4727 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:44:31.68 +26:31:34.6: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:44:31.68 +26:31:34.6: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4908 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:02:35.21 +32:53:54.3: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:02:35.21 +32:53:54.3: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4949 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:34:52.13 +33:18:19.8: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:34:52.13 +33:18:19.8: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4294 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20251.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20267.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 33s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20251_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
Preparing report for the candidate 20251_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20267_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
Preparing report for the candidate 20267_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20268_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20268_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20270_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20270_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20275_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20275_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20276_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20276_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20277_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20277_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20279_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20279_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:17:29.04 +33:50:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20280_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20280_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20281_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20281_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20282_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20282_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20283_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20283_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20284_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20284_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20285_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20285_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20286_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20286_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20288_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20288_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20290_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20290_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:06:55.91 +25:41:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20291_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20291_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20293_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20293_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20294_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20294_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20295_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20295_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20296_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20296_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20297_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20297_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20298_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20298_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20299_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20299_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20300_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20300_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20302_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20302_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20303_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20303_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20304_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20304_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20305_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20305_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20306_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20306_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20308_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20308_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20309_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20309_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20310_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20310_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20311_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20311_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20313_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20313_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20314_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20314_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20318_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20318_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20320_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20320_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20321_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20321_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20322_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20322_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20325_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20325_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20326_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20326_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20329_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20329_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20330_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20330_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20331_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20331_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20332_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20332_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20333_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20333_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20334_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20334_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20336_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20336_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20056_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 20056_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:07:51.00 +27:56:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11861_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 11861_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:07.15 +25:03:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 36s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
01:26:55.31 +30:47:47.0
02:26:43.18 +25:42:43.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:00.767 +29:59:43.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:00.129 +30:00:30.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.767 +29:59:43.74
Second-epoch image center 02:00:00.129 +30:00:30.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0132 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:59:57.391 +29:59:56.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.767 +29:59:43.74
Second-epoch image center 01:59:57.391 +29:59:56.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0127 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:00:00.129 +30:00:30.35
Second-epoch second image center 01:59:57.391 +29:59:56.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01365 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0yGhRFuZzc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M9rGvs6vee
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9l9n7GchJS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EA46ri9zY9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 73246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.5706 to 39.6918 deg, Dec +24.3217 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.5706 to 39.6918 deg, Dec 24.3217 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 8459 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5808 out of 6890 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6890 out of 73246 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.00
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.82
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.82
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 73246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.5706 to 39.6918 deg, Dec +24.3217 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.5706 to 39.6918 deg, Dec 24.3217 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 8459 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5808 out of 6890 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6890 out of 73246 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 58792 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.4130 to 39.4510 deg, Dec +24.4125 to +35.2639 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.4130 to 39.4510 deg, Dec 24.4125 to 35.2639 deg
Loaded 8329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6052 out of 6815 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6815 out of 58792 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 32 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
2.1 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
4.2 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
4.2 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
15.4 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0yGhRFuZzc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4778, bad_region=6, passed=73229
Got 73229 stars (including 68317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73229 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4835 stars left (next iteration limit 5318)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits N_match=4835 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.235 n_q1=1268 n_q2=1372 n_q3=1109 n_q4=1086 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4835 N_valid=4835 bias_ra_arcsec=0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=0.008 median_sep_arcsec=0.227 p95_sep_arcsec=0.795 n_q1=1268 n_q2=1372 n_q3=1109 n_q4=1086 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.M9rGvs6vee (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=3229, bad_region=1, passed=58760
Got 58760 stars (including 55458 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58760 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4826 stars left (next iteration limit 5307)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits N_match=4826 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.456 n_q1=1054 n_q2=1140 n_q3=1270 n_q4=1362 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.067
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4826 N_valid=4826 bias_ra_arcsec=0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.020 median_sep_arcsec=0.365 p95_sep_arcsec=1.417 n_q1=1054 n_q2=1140 n_q3=1270 n_q4=1362 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9l9n7GchJS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=68, blended=3663, bad_region=47, passed=51354
Got 51354 stars (including 47614 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51354 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4837 stars left (next iteration limit 5320)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4837 robust_rms=13.411 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.616 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.616 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4837 robust_rms=0.477 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.815 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.815 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4837 robust_rms=0.361 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.611 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.611 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4837 robust_rms_before=1.537 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.384 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.361 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.681 worst_region_rms_after=0.611 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.299 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.611
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 1.537 -> 0.361 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits is a symbolic link
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4837 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4679 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4679 pairs (4837 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4679 robust_rms=13.257 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.761 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.761 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4679 robust_rms=0.469 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.818 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.818 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4679 robust_rms=0.358 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.604 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.604 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4679 robust_rms_before=0.358 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.358 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.358 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.605 worst_region_rms_after=0.604 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.605 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.604
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.358 -> 0.358 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits is a symbolic link
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4679 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4679 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits N_match=4679 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=1305 n_q2=1237 n_q3=1125 n_q4=1012 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4679 N_valid=4679 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.981 bias_dec_arcsec=0.841 median_sep_arcsec=1.403 p95_sep_arcsec=2.854 n_q1=1305 n_q2=1237 n_q3=1125 n_q4=1012 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.EA46ri9zY9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=52, blended=3636, bad_region=47, passed=51458
Got 51458 stars (including 47734 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5319)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4836 robust_rms=13.396 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.644 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.644 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4836 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.810 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.810 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4836 robust_rms=0.366 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.620 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.620 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4836 robust_rms_before=1.529 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.390 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.366 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.653 worst_region_rms_after=0.620 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.286 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.620
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.653 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.653 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.390 arcsec matched=4836
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.367 n_q1=1356 n_q2=1279 n_q3=1153 n_q4=1048 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4836 N_valid=4836 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.976 bias_dec_arcsec=0.831 median_sep_arcsec=1.395 p95_sep_arcsec=3.115 n_q1=1356 n_q2=1279 n_q3=1153 n_q4=1048 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_011531_TTUQ1b1x1_3089140_5k3iGht1/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:23:32.32 +26:30:44.9: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:32:14.48 +33:14:24.8: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:56:11.72 +30:55:52.2: 15.13 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:26:17.19 +34:15:48.8: 14.43 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:47:30.81 +33:09:33.6: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:21:35.28 +26:52:51.3: 14.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:20:38.67 +28:52:38.9: 14.71 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:10:35.44 +29:05:12.8: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:43:11.11 +32:38:26.1: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:29:00.68 +25:17:57.6: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:47:30.81 +33:09:33.6: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:26:17.19 +34:15:48.8: 14.41 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:47:30.81 +33:09:33.6: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2857 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:26:17.19 +34:15:48.8: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5359 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:32:14.48 +33:14:24.8: 13.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:32:14.48 +33:14:24.8: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9135 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:20:38.67 +28:52:38.9: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:23:32.32 +26:30:44.9: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:56:11.72 +30:55:52.2: 14.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:20:38.67 +28:52:38.9: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6376 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:43:11.11 +32:38:26.1: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:23:32.32 +26:30:44.9: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2400 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:56:11.72 +30:55:52.2: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7082 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:43:11.11 +32:38:26.1: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1308 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:21:35.28 +26:52:51.3: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:29:00.68 +25:17:57.6: 14.26 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:10:35.44 +29:05:12.8: 14.34 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:21:35.28 +26:52:51.3: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3515 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:29:00.68 +25:17:57.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3921 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:10:35.44 +29:05:12.8: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4161 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:25:21.26 +34:01:30.5: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:30:42.17 +29:22:59.2: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:23:39.84 +34:45:27.7: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:32:33.01 +29:39:10.2: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:25:21.26 +34:01:30.5: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:14:54.90 +30:04:17.1: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:25:21.26 +34:01:30.5: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6213 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:30:42.17 +29:22:59.2: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:30:42.17 +29:22:59.2: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4028 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:23:39.84 +34:45:27.7: 13.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:32:33.01 +29:39:10.2: 14.02 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:23:39.84 +34:45:27.7: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1117 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:34:54.63 +32:01:45.3: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:32:33.01 +29:39:10.2: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7392 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:14:54.90 +30:04:17.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:26:50.80 +32:55:37.6: 15.45 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:32:05.95 +25:04:16.6: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:17:12.96 +26:51:30.1: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:34:54.63 +32:01:45.3: 14.75 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:34:54.63 +32:01:45.3: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4018 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:25:25.50 +26:13:26.3: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:26:50.80 +32:55:37.6: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:17:12.96 +26:51:30.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:26:50.80 +32:55:37.6: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7409 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:32:05.95 +25:04:16.6: 15.00 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:32:05.95 +25:04:16.6: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6538 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:25:25.50 +26:13:26.3: 15.20 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:25:25.50 +26:13:26.3: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6199 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:26:12.28 +31:35:16.4: 15.66 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:04:36.99 +24:55:19.2: 15.44 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 01:26:12.28 +31:35:16.4: 15.44 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:26:12.28 +31:35:16.4: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.7006 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_05-20-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0365.fits at 02:04:36.99 +24:55:19.2: 15.73 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:04:36.99 +24:55:19.2: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8239 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86127.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86472.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 88s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85608_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 85608_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85609_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 85609_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85620_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 85620_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85641_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 85641_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85656_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 85656_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85658_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 85658_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85659_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 85659_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85663_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 85663_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85664_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 85664_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85670_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 85670_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85683_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 85683_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:11.00 +32:26:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85695_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 85695_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85699_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 85699_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85760_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 85760_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:26:55.31 +30:47:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85780_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 85780_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:26:43.18 +25:42:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85940_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 85940_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86066_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 86066_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:58:08.27 +31:05:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86127_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
Preparing report for the candidate 86127_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86141_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 86141_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86260_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 86260_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:08:02.68 +34:38:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86289_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 86289_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86376_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 86376_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86459_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 86459_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86472_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
Preparing report for the candidate 86472_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86533_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 86533_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86599_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 86599_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86645_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 86645_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86662_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 86662_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86667_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 86667_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12017_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 12017_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:01:10.78 +33:47:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28852_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 28852_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:03:30.72 +31:33:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51017_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328
The candidate 51017_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-14-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0328 did not pass the final checks