NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-10-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.18713    2461347.68713    8.70    01:01:43.35 -19:49:35.2   6019 2149   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    8.71    01:01:43.31 -19:49:35.5   6026 2150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 11 03.1875  2461347.6875   8.71  01:01:43.33 -19:49:35.4
141.35805 -82.32766 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.9 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
2 Pallas                  -0     -1       1   8.5     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:01:43.33 -19:49:35.4:  15.60 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:01:43.33 -19:49:35.4:  15.51 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-10-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.18713    2461347.68713    12.78    01:09:56.61 -14:31:04.1   7140 5379   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    12.77    01:09:56.63 -14:31:04.4   7147 5380   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 11 03.1875  2461347.6875  12.78  01:09:56.62 -14:31:04.2
142.73212 -76.67288 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
166 Rhodope                 -1     -0       1  12.8     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:09:56.62 -14:31:04.2:  15.72 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:09:56.62 -14:31:04.2:  15.57 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-10-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.18713    2461347.68713    13.71    00:25:07.47 -17:49:02.9   0723 3091   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    13.70    00:25:07.48 -17:49:02.7   0730 3092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 11 03.1875  2461347.6875  13.71  00:25:07.47 -17:49:02.8
 88.47203 -78.88632 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
893 Leopoldina              -0      1       1  13.9     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:25:07.47 -17:49:02.8:  15.59 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:25:07.47 -17:49:02.8:  15.35 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-10-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 3

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-10-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-10-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-10-Q1b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 44534 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 44534 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits_preview.png'
Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits

renamed 'Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits_preview.png'
Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1164.6233 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 463.0200 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1606.6199 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 527.3276 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1603.6765 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 527.2731 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.37952 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 15.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 13.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-02T22:29:18.4319091' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-03T04:29:18.4319091' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61347.1870188774 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-03T04:29:28.3351137' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61347.1871335069 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 13.3305583620552 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9999496858271 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 38.1075 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 173.021666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.61785883819415 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 53 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29489 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29489 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 66.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 897.9 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 13.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 164.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.900952 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits :) Spent 0.762267 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 15.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 13.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-02T22:30:23.4818716' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-03T04:30:23.4818716' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61347.1877717706 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-03T04:30:33.3843312' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61347.187886389 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 13.3305583757825 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9999496550185 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 38.1347222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 173.353333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.61688435256657 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 53 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29489 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29489 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 66.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 897.9 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 13.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 164.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.900952 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits :) Spent 0.794886 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits


fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.68713462 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Image size: 940.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:19.700 -18:01:30.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:19.700 -18:01:30.57 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0151 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Image size: 940.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:16.813 -18:01:39.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:16.813 -18:01:39.62 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0190 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:53:19.700 -18:01:30.57 Second-epoch second image center 00:53:16.813 -18:01:39.62 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01171 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T2NSrBLhGk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3yMsK4hQjY Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s3KNVP74fG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KzCKMF8KmU Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.886450 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.886450 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg Loaded 4161 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2348 out of 2396 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2396 out of 4144 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 2.1 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 3.9 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 3.9 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 15.0 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.T2NSrBLhGk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=318, bad_region=0, passed=4470 Got 4470 stars (including 4148 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4069 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4067 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4470 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4069 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4470 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4470 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4067 stars left (next iteration limit 4473) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4067 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=970 n_q2=1070 n_q3=960 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4067 N_valid=4067 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.000 median_sep_arcsec=0.231 p95_sep_arcsec=0.709 n_q1=970 n_q2=1070 n_q3=960 n_q4=1067 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.3yMsK4hQjY (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=259, bad_region=1, passed=4144 Got 4144 stars (including 3880 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3804 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3800 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 3803 stars left (next iteration limit 4180) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=3803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=909 n_q2=1014 n_q3=908 n_q4=972 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3803 N_valid=3803 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.675 bias_dec_arcsec=0.892 median_sep_arcsec=3.575 p95_sep_arcsec=7.341 n_q1=909 n_q2=1014 n_q3=908 n_q4=972 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.s3KNVP74fG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=188, bad_region=0, passed=4695 Got 4695 stars (including 4505 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4695 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4421 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4418 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4418 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4418 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4695 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4421 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4418 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4695 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4418 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4695 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4418 stars left (next iteration limit 4859) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4418 robust_rms=13.667 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.358 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.358 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4418 robust_rms=0.487 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.656 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.656 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4418 robust_rms=0.348 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.482 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.482 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4418 robust_rms_before=0.880 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.318 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.348 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.482 worst_region_rms_after=0.482 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.142 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.482 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.482 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.482 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.318 arcsec matched=4418 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits N_match=4418 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.251 n_q1=1001 n_q2=992 n_q3=1264 n_q4=1161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.339 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4418 N_valid=4418 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.174 bias_dec_arcsec=0.453 median_sep_arcsec=0.808 p95_sep_arcsec=1.628 n_q1=1001 n_q2=992 n_q3=1264 n_q4=1161 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.KzCKMF8KmU (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=188, bad_region=0, passed=4707 Got 4707 stars (including 4515 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4707 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4429 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4426 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4426 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4426 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4707 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4429 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4426 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4707 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4426 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4707 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4426 stars left (next iteration limit 4868) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4426 robust_rms=13.622 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.876 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.876 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4426 robust_rms=0.480 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.724 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.724 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4426 robust_rms=0.338 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.463 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.463 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4426 robust_rms_before=0.871 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.321 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.338 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.455 worst_region_rms_after=0.463 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.093 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.463 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.455 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.455 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.321 arcsec matched=4426 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits N_match=4426 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1012 n_q2=1001 n_q3=1272 n_q4=1141 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4426 N_valid=4426 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.154 bias_dec_arcsec=0.474 median_sep_arcsec=0.804 p95_sep_arcsec=1.662 n_q1=1012 n_q2=1001 n_q3=1272 n_q4=1141 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits sigma_overall=0.277 worst_q_ratio=1.241 ref2=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits sigma_overall=0.289 worst_q_ratio=1.079 new1=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits sigma_overall=0.300 worst_q_ratio=1.339 new2=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.271 reference average sigma_overall=0.283 worst_q_ratio=1.16 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017_astrometric_residuals.png (4067 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067_astrometric_residuals.png (3803 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223_astrometric_residuals.png (4418 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224_astrometric_residuals.png (4426 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:03:26.68 -15:58:19.4: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:53:46.24 -14:44:04.1: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:58:18.91 -16:02:34.3: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:51:17.33 -16:28:46.9: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:01:43.33 -19:49:35.4: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:03:12.64 -16:35:07.4: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:20:10.92 -15:47:41.2: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:59:10.34 -18:44:46.2: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:03:26.68 -15:58:19.4: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:58:18.91 -16:02:34.3: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:03:26.68 -15:58:19.4: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0604 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:18.91 -16:02:34.3: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9109 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:03:12.64 -16:35:07.4: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:53:46.24 -14:44:04.1: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:03:12.64 -16:35:07.4: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0547 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:46.24 -14:44:04.1: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0024 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:01:43.33 -19:49:35.4: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:51:17.33 -16:28:46.9: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:51:17.33 -16:28:46.9: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9493 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:59:10.34 -18:44:46.2: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:59:10.34 -18:44:46.2: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9357 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:20:10.92 -15:47:41.2: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:10.92 -15:47:41.2: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0541 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20120.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 59s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20114_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 The candidate 20114_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.18713    2461347.68713    12.01    00:53:46.23 -14:44:03.9   4779 5179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    11.99    00:53:46.24 -14:44:04.3   4786 5181   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20120_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 Preparing report for the candidate 20120_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20211_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 The candidate 20211_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.18713    2461347.68713    11.91    00:58:18.90 -16:02:34.2   5465 4413   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    11.91    00:58:18.92 -16:02:34.4   5472 4414   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20216_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 The candidate 20216_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.18713    2461347.68713    11.93    00:59:10.36 -18:44:46.0   5638 2790   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    11.94    00:59:10.33 -18:44:46.4   5645 2791   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20222_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 The candidate 20222_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.18713    2461347.68713    11.97    00:51:17.35 -16:28:46.8   4460 4113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    11.93    00:51:17.32 -16:28:47.0   4467 4115   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20228_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 The candidate 20228_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.18713    2461347.68713    12.03    01:03:26.68 -15:58:19.5   6208 4477   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    12.09    01:03:26.68 -15:58:19.4   6214 4479   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20231_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 The candidate 20231_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.18713    2461347.68713    12.05    01:03:12.63 -16:35:07.2   6182 4106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    12.06    01:03:12.65 -16:35:07.6   6189 4108   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20232_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 The candidate 20232_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.18713    2461347.68713    12.05    01:20:10.92 -15:47:41.3   8653 4624   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    12.06    01:20:10.92 -15:47:41.2   8660 4626   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 62s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 01:01:43.33 -19:49:35.4 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Image size: 940.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:19.700 -18:01:30.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:19.700 -18:01:30.57 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0151 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Image size: 940.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:16.813 -18:01:39.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:16.813 -18:01:39.62 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0190 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:53:19.700 -18:01:30.57 Second-epoch second image center 00:53:16.813 -18:01:39.62 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01171 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oErtSQrSPj Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8JV8AWxdQW Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L0YSlzPz8E Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5LAaDDMAci Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.777200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.777200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 21682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg Loaded 4192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2550 out of 2661 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2661 out of 21682 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=4.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 2.0 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 3.5 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 3.5 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 15.2 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.oErtSQrSPj (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=893, bad_region=1, passed=24280 Got 24280 stars (including 23344 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24280 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24280 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24280 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24280 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1223 n_q2=1268 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4897 N_valid=4897 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.232 p95_sep_arcsec=0.678 n_q1=1223 n_q2=1268 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1225 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.8JV8AWxdQW (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=669, bad_region=24, passed=21674 Got 21674 stars (including 20941 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21674 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21674 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21674 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21674 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5381) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1253 n_q2=1274 n_q3=1187 n_q4=1177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4891 N_valid=4891 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.540 bias_dec_arcsec=1.015 median_sep_arcsec=3.429 p95_sep_arcsec=7.359 n_q1=1253 n_q2=1274 n_q3=1187 n_q4=1177 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.L0YSlzPz8E (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=716, bad_region=47, passed=18208 Got 18208 stars (including 17423 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18208 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18208 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18208 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18208 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=13.327 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.921 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.921 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.501 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.676 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.676 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.359 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.488 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.488 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=0.886 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.330 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.359 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.468 worst_region_rms_after=0.488 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.155 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.488 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.468 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.468 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.330 arcsec matched=4880 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=1124 n_q2=1128 n_q3=1385 n_q4=1243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.314 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4880 N_valid=4880 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.175 bias_dec_arcsec=0.427 median_sep_arcsec=0.803 p95_sep_arcsec=1.675 n_q1=1124 n_q2=1128 n_q3=1385 n_q4=1243 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.5LAaDDMAci (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=660, bad_region=47, passed=18311 Got 18311 stars (including 17576 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18311 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18311 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18311 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18311 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5363) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=13.436 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.697 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.697 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.496 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.744 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.744 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.350 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.480 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.480 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=0.874 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.333 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.350 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.461 worst_region_rms_after=0.480 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.111 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.480 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.461 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.461 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.333 arcsec matched=4876 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1146 n_q2=1113 n_q3=1376 n_q4=1241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4876 N_valid=4876 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.148 bias_dec_arcsec=0.448 median_sep_arcsec=0.798 p95_sep_arcsec=1.677 n_q1=1146 n_q2=1113 n_q3=1376 n_q4=1241 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:37:43.13 -15:08:56.1: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:09:56.62 -14:31:04.2: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:31:35.28 -17:53:24.6: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:27:46.63 -17:35:35.5: 14.22 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:25:07.47 -17:49:02.8: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:24:16.07 -14:38:25.9: 14.86 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:01:11.95 -15:07:15.8: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:45:57.79 -20:12:51.4: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:31:35.28 -17:53:24.6: 15.01 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:09:56.62 -14:31:04.2: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:35.28 -17:53:24.6: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4895 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:27:46.63 -17:35:35.5: 14.24 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:24:16.07 -14:38:25.9: 14.62 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:45:57.79 -20:12:51.4: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:37:43.13 -15:08:56.1: 14.70 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:46.63 -17:35:35.5: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1814 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:01:11.95 -15:07:15.8: 14.23 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:25:07.47 -17:49:02.8: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:45:57.79 -20:12:51.4: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4233 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:16.07 -14:38:25.9: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4783 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:37:43.13 -15:08:56.1: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5378 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:01:11.95 -15:07:15.8: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2924 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31059.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31337.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 60s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30813_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 The candidate 30813_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.18713    2461347.68713    14.17    00:27:46.65 -17:35:35.3   1100 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    14.19    00:27:46.60 -17:35:35.7   1106 3256   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30814_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 The candidate 30814_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.18713    2461347.68713    14.23    01:01:11.96 -15:07:16.2   5868 4981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    14.37    01:01:11.94 -15:07:15.5   5875 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30827_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 The candidate 30827_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.18713    2461347.68713    13.40    00:45:57.80 -20:12:50.1   3798 1833   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    13.46    00:45:57.78 -20:12:52.6   3805 1834   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30836_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 The candidate 30836_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    8.58    01:01:43.32 -19:49:35.6   6026 2150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits **** FOUND 01:01:43.33 -19:49:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31059_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 Preparing report for the candidate 31059_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31337_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 Preparing report for the candidate 31337_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31594_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 The candidate 31594_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.18713    2461347.68713    14.41    00:31:35.27 -17:53:26.6   1665 3113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    14.66    00:31:35.29 -17:53:22.7   1672 3115   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31603_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 The candidate 31603_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.18713    2461347.68713    14.52    00:37:43.09 -15:08:57.8   2451 4822   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    14.57    00:37:43.17 -15:08:54.4   2458 4824   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31625_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 The candidate 31625_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.18713    2461347.68713    14.48    00:24:16.10 -14:38:25.4   0448 5009   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-29-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    14.48    00:24:16.04 -14:38:26.3   0455 5011   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 14426_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 The candidate 14426_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    13.49    00:53:23.54 -18:44:14.3   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 05821_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 The candidate 05821_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 11 03.18789    2461347.68789    12.94    00:58:29.41 -15:08:48.6   5481 4956   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_224841_TTUQ1b1x1_1086500_7L6PMSgP/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-30-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits **** FOUND 00:58:29.41 -15:08:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 62s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 01:01:43.33 -19:49:35.4 01:09:56.62 -14:31:04.2 00:25:07.47 -17:49:02.8 ########### Completed Cet-10-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 01:01:43.33 -19:49:35.4 01:09:56.62 -14:31:04.2 00:25:07.47 -17:49:02.8 ################################################################################### 01:01:43.33 -19:49:35.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 01:09:56.62 -14:31:04.2 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:25:07.47 -17:49:02.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461347.68713462 -observatory V36 14:43:40.43 -16:44:57.5 Mercury (5.2mag) 13:25:35.21 -13:39:10.4 Venus (-4.3mag) 09:29:10.89 +16:34:56.2 Mars (0.8mag) 09:47:00.29 +14:06:32.3 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:36:27.74 +01:00:51.2 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:09:03.69 +20:50:12.4 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:08:20.88 -00:38:11.7 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:27.98 -23:41:34.6 Pluto (14.5mag) 10:00:07.94 +11:40:13.3 Moon (-9.9mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Nov 2 23:26 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461347.68713462: 09:46:57.62 +14:06:48.5 Io (6.0mag) 09:46:55.16 +14:07:04.0 Europa (6.1mag) 09:47:15.28 +14:05:06.3 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:47:29.03 +14:03:48.4 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:48:26.51 +14:16:10.1 Himalia (15.5mag) 09:46:59.05 +14:06:39.1 Thebe (16.3mag) 09:46:45.61 +14:31:32.4 Elara (17.4mag) 09:47:46.81 +13:34:08.0 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 09:44:02.66 +14:38:25.0 Carme (18.7mag) 00:36:35.90 +01:00:22.0 Titan (8.3mag) 00:36:29.78 +01:00:49.7 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:36:57.74 +01:01:27.5 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:36:15.84 +01:00:32.9 Hyperion (14.2mag) 00:34:41.00 +00:48:41.2 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 2 23:26 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461347.68713462: 04:35:37.94 +17:22:59.9 JWST 12:49:26.65 +52:54:46.0 Chandra 06:15:35.05 +21:43:04.5 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 2 23:26 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461347.68713462 -observatory V36 03:33:49.32 +19:57:08.6 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:46:33.95 +38:22:05.8 17.9mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:46:39.31 +38:21:52.8 17.9mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:45:57.90 +38:22:12.5 17.9mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:01:58.30 +39:08:55.1 17.8mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:47:49.51 -32:53:03.9 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:45:17.35 -73:53:30.5 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:11:32.54 +35:18:08.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 07:35:41.65 +25:20:21.6 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:08:33.28 +38:29:54.7 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:36:51.60 +40:52:26.8 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:43:08.15 -13:33:34.3 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 14:15:01.62 -04:34:12.8 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 20:13:55.25 +53:14:02.0 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 13:07:22.70 +16:57:16.7 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:01:07.70 -65:17:01.8 14.5mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:33:50.82 -05:21:58.4 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 23:29:25.94 +14:07:04.1 16.8mag 2P/Encke 23:25:46.73 -25:50:26.8 15.4mag 10P/Tempel 02:39:42.52 +30:41:26.4 16.3mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:26:01.22 -10:01:04.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:10:45.68 -09:01:36.5 15.8mag 65P/Gunn 08:00:01.98 +13:36:31.8 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 08:59:03.82 +45:54:02.3 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:50:43.35 +05:40:50.6 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:26:27.12 +08:05:45.9 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 19:49:27.89 +14:21:14.5 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 11:11:42.09 -03:04:02.6 16.2mag 169P/NEAT 09:41:28.98 +23:30:28.2 18.0mag 186P/Garradd 03:10:55.30 +02:12:15.8 15.3mag 220P/McNaught 06:22:38.41 +49:43:47.5 15.6mag 260P/McNaught 07:56:15.31 +25:04:46.4 17.6mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Nov 2 23:26 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92 10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27 21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82 01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9 01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88 00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.89 -10:37:05.90 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.05 15.79 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 2 23:26 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 2 23:26 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:53:52.220 +41:47:24.16 AT 2026afqm 2026-10-16.83 19.331 06:23:17.419 +70:33:15.10 SN 2026afql 2026-10-17.15 18.737 02:38:36.934 +41:55:58.84 AT 2026afqk 2026-10-17.04 19.369 05:26:14.588 -27:06:01.24 AT 2026afqj 2026-10-17.29 19.31 02:01:09.758 -36:18:14.69 AT 2026afqi 2026-10-12.26 19.361 09:44:49.328 +38:11:23.47 SN 2026afqh 2026-10-17.22 18.467 17:38:02.102 +55:52:14.30 AT 2026afqg 2026-10-16.84 19.253 02:35:38.526 -36:21:14.39 AT 2026afqf 2026-10-17.25 19.522 00:43:30.828 +41:26:55.48 AT 2026afqe 2026-10-17.57 18.61 00:25:27.859 +20:14:37.33 SN 2026afqd 2026-10-17.09 19.18 08:07:08.624 +06:16:20.09 SN 2026afqc 2026-10-11.25 19.94 04:47:31.739 +04:21:53.97 SN 2026afqb 2026-10-05.43 20.6842 03:07:45.440 -28:00:44.28 AT 2026afqa 2026-09-13.29 19.318 05:09:31.456 +75:44:45.10 AT 2026afpz 2026-10-11.55 19.477 07:54:22.348 +45:24:44.35 AT 2026afpy 2026-10-14.57 19.243 09:05:20.790 -70:27:10.93 AT 2026afpx 2026-10-15.10 18.44 19:07:21.022 +39:54:50.78 AT 2026afpw 2026-10-14.27 19.073 18:53:58.015 +34:24:21.77 AT 2026afpv 2026-10-13.86 18.776 18:40:01.554 -27:06:46.60 AT 2026afpu 2026-10-05.24 18.99 20:21:05.817 +62:24:12.13 AT 2026afpt 2026-10-16.29 19.142 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 2 23:26 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C