This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.1495 2461347.6495 12.24 22:05:03.91 -14:38:39.1
42.21128 -49.39892 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.5 Astraea -0 -0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:05:03.91 -14:38:39.1: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:05:03.91 -14:38:39.1: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.6495,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.1495 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.1495 2461347.6495 13.29 22:15:23.95 -10:14:35.2
50.01921 -49.60717 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.117 Lomia -1 -1 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:15:23.95 -10:14:35.2: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:15:23.95 -10:14:35.2: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.6495,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.1495 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.1495 2461347.6495 13.65 21:53:21.75 -10:31:24.3
45.77105 -45.00637 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.78 Diana -1 -0 1 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:53:21.75 -10:31:24.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:53:21.75 -10:31:24.3: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.1495* 21 53 21.75 -10 31 24.3 13.7 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.6495,13.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.1495 13.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.1495 2461347.6495 14.21 22:23:15.40 -10:33:27.7
51.13164 -51.43253 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.208 Lacrimosa -1 -1 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:23:15.40 -10:33:27.7: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:23:15.40 -10:33:27.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.6495,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.1495 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.1495 2461347.6495 14.48 22:08:42.43 -10:44:10.5
48.12615 -48.42055 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.303 Josephina -1 -1 1 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:08:42.43 -10:44:10.5: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:08:42.43 -10:44:10.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.6495,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.1495 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93279922 21.07.2026 10:23:03.853 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
First image: 2461242.93279922 21.07.2026 10:23:03.853 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Last image: 2461347.64975582 03.11.2026 03:35:28.903 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7561
Objects passed selection criteria: 7556
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7256
Average stars matched: 6918.5 (95.3487 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233972 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Nov 2 23:08:39 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93279922 21.07.2026 10:23:03.853 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
First image: 2461242.93279922 21.07.2026 10:23:03.853 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Last image: 2461347.64975582 03.11.2026 03:35:28.903 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 65
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.12
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 164 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 44415
Objects passed selection criteria: 44291
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 43142.2
Average stars matched: 41410.2 (95.9854 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 264504 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Nov 2 23:14:10 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.64916859
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:16:59.412 -09:59:39.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:13.794 -10:00:08.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:16:59.412 -09:59:39.54
Second-epoch image center 22:17:13.794 -10:00:08.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0596 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:15.427 -10:00:45.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:16:59.412 -09:59:39.54
Second-epoch image center 22:17:15.427 -10:00:45.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0682 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 22:17:13.794 -10:00:08.97
Second-epoch second image center 22:17:15.427 -10:00:45.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01213 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VofmXnmIsI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits &> /tmp/tmp.37xY8VnzyL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Yjs6UwNnOr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wTaB9WdK67
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits and wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits and wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits and wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6925 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 325.8536 to 342.4026 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 325.8536 to 342.4026 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2140 deg
Loaded 5569 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4112 out of 4275 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4275 out of 6925 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.673200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.673200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6925 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 325.8536 to 342.4026 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 325.8536 to 342.4026 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2140 deg
Loaded 5569 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4112 out of 4275 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4275 out of 6925 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits (aperture=5.8)
Read 6918 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 325.8535 to 342.3813 deg, Dec -15.6029 to -4.2885 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 325.8535 to 342.3813 deg, Dec -15.6029 to -4.2885 deg
Loaded 5525 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4139 out of 4302 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4302 out of 6918 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
2.1 pix Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
15.3 mag. Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.VofmXnmIsI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=496, bad_region=0, passed=6925
Got 6925 stars (including 6418 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6925 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4341 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4341 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4318 stars left (next iteration limit 4749)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits N_match=4318 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=1030 n_q2=1223 n_q3=924 n_q4=1141 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4318 N_valid=4318 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.273 p95_sep_arcsec=0.872 n_q1=1030 n_q2=1223 n_q3=924 n_q4=1141 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits -region wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.37xY8VnzyL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=479, bad_region=0, passed=6918
Got 6918 stars (including 6429 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6918 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4340 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4319 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4338 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4316 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4316 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4316 stars left (next iteration limit 4749)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits N_match=4316 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=1033 n_q2=1228 n_q3=924 n_q4=1131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4316 N_valid=4316 bias_ra_arcsec=0.006 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.256 p95_sep_arcsec=0.806 n_q1=1033 n_q2=1228 n_q3=924 n_q4=1131 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits -region wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Yjs6UwNnOr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=486, bad_region=0, passed=7704
Got 7704 stars (including 7206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7704 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4338 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4338 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4318 stars left (next iteration limit 4748)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4318 robust_rms=14.439 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.436 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.436 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4318 robust_rms=0.438 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.704 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.704 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4318 robust_rms=0.235 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.297 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.297 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4318 robust_rms_before=0.914 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.248 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.235 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.321 worst_region_rms_after=0.297 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.946 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.297
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.321 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.321 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.248 arcsec matched=4318
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits N_match=4318 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.213 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1045 n_q2=1209 n_q3=933 n_q4=1131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4318 N_valid=4318 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.457 bias_dec_arcsec=0.503 median_sep_arcsec=0.822 p95_sep_arcsec=1.655 n_q1=1045 n_q2=1209 n_q3=933 n_q4=1131 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wTaB9WdK67 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=494, bad_region=0, passed=7677
Got 7677 stars (including 7172 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7677 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4343 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4322 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4322 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4322 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4342 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4321 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4321 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4321 stars left (next iteration limit 4754)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4321 robust_rms=14.469 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.369 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.369 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4321 robust_rms=0.450 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.643 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.643 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4321 robust_rms=0.247 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.298 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.298 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4321 robust_rms_before=0.924 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.267 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.247 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.340 worst_region_rms_after=0.298 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.942 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.298
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.sip_refit.M6NJ3l/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.sip_refit.M6NJ3l/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:15.465 -10:00:45.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7677 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.sip_refit.M6NJ3l/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_245539.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.sip_refit.M6NJ3l/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.WAOFrc' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_245539.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.924 -> 0.247 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4321 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4137 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4137 pairs (4321 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4137 robust_rms=14.353 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.503 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.503 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4137 robust_rms=0.446 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.639 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.639 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4137 robust_rms=0.246 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.296 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.296 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4137 robust_rms_before=0.246 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.246 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.246 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.297 worst_region_rms_after=0.296 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.297 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.296
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.sip_refit.cXkdz5/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.sip_refit.cXkdz5/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:15.466 -10:00:45.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7677 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.sip_refit.cXkdz5/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_251312.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.sip_refit.cXkdz5/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.7QewGA' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_251312.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.246 -> 0.246 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4137 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4137 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits N_match=4137 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=985 n_q2=1167 n_q3=903 n_q4=1082 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4137 N_valid=4137 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.210 p95_sep_arcsec=0.584 n_q1=985 n_q2=1167 n_q3=903 n_q4=1082 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits sigma_overall=0.352 worst_q_ratio=1.115
ref2=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.177
new1=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits sigma_overall=0.255 worst_q_ratio=1.092
new2=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits sigma_overall=0.262 worst_q_ratio=1.079
reference average sigma_overall=0.3415 worst_q_ratio=1.146
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859_astrometric_residuals.png (4318 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860_astrometric_residuals.png (4316 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171_astrometric_residuals.png (4318 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172_astrometric_residuals.png (4137 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.19 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:15:23.52 -08:39:06.3: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:17:21.98 -09:35:11.3: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:22:11.92 -09:21:06.4: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:21:13.53 -06:27:18.3: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:23:46.98 -08:09:27.1: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:15:23.52 -08:39:06.3: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:23:46.98 -08:09:27.1: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:21:13.53 -06:27:18.3: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:22:11.92 -09:21:06.4: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:17:21.98 -09:35:11.3: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:23:46.98 -08:09:27.1: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0397 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:22:11.92 -09:21:06.4: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0007 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:17:21.98 -09:35:11.3: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0634 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:15:23.52 -08:39:06.3: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1013 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:21:13.53 -06:27:18.3: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9563 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20448_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 20448_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20452_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 20452_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20453_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 20453_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20454_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 20454_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20456_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 20456_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aqr-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:16:59.412 -09:59:39.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:13.794 -10:00:08.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:16:59.412 -09:59:39.54
Second-epoch image center 22:17:13.794 -10:00:08.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0596 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:15.466 -10:00:45.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:16:59.412 -09:59:39.54
Second-epoch image center 22:17:15.466 -10:00:45.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0684 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 22:17:13.794 -10:00:08.97
Second-epoch second image center 22:17:15.466 -10:00:45.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01230 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iuUYav0sGM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Oqs7vPf7gy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fq3pJVrn1i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NLn9QnPyxN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits and wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits and wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits and wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 44007 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 325.8306 to 342.4342 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2093 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 325.8306 to 342.4342 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2093 deg
Loaded 5591 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4073 out of 4476 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4476 out of 44007 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.570300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.570300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.12
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 44007 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 325.8306 to 342.4342 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2093 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 325.8306 to 342.4342 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2093 deg
Loaded 5591 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4073 out of 4476 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4476 out of 44007 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 43933 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 325.8257 to 342.4191 deg, Dec -15.6029 to -4.2242 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 325.8257 to 342.4191 deg, Dec -15.6029 to -4.2242 deg
Loaded 5583 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4085 out of 4489 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4489 out of 43933 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
2.0 pix Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
15.4 mag. Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.iuUYav0sGM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1813, bad_region=20, passed=43984
Got 43984 stars (including 42059 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43984 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4331 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4332 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4311 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4311 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4311 stars left (next iteration limit 4744)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits N_match=4311 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1040 n_q2=1219 n_q3=934 n_q4=1118 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4311 N_valid=4311 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.269 p95_sep_arcsec=0.817 n_q1=1040 n_q2=1219 n_q3=934 n_q4=1118 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits -region wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Oqs7vPf7gy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1714, bad_region=21, passed=43912
Got 43912 stars (including 42099 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43912 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4334 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4315 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4315 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4333 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4314 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4314 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4314 stars left (next iteration limit 4746)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits N_match=4314 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=1055 n_q2=1210 n_q3=924 n_q4=1125 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4314 N_valid=4314 bias_ra_arcsec=0.006 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.249 p95_sep_arcsec=0.770 n_q1=1055 n_q2=1210 n_q3=924 n_q4=1125 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits -region wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Fq3pJVrn1i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1736, bad_region=46, passed=42836
Got 42836 stars (including 40972 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42836 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4337 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4316 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4316 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4338 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4317 stars left (next iteration limit 4747)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4317 robust_rms=14.549 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.078 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.078 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4317 robust_rms=0.441 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.713 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.713 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4317 robust_rms=0.237 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.295 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.295 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4317 robust_rms_before=0.919 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.242 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.237 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.314 worst_region_rms_after=0.295 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.947 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.295
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.314 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.314 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.242 arcsec matched=4317
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits N_match=4317 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.216 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1053 n_q2=1212 n_q3=938 n_q4=1114 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4317 N_valid=4317 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.454 bias_dec_arcsec=0.512 median_sep_arcsec=0.828 p95_sep_arcsec=1.654 n_q1=1053 n_q2=1212 n_q3=938 n_q4=1114 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NLn9QnPyxN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1735, bad_region=46, passed=43181
Got 43181 stars (including 41323 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43181 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4332 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4331 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4312 stars left (next iteration limit 4744)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4312 robust_rms=14.579 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.355 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.355 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4312 robust_rms=0.450 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.652 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.652 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4312 robust_rms=0.245 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.299 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.299 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4312 robust_rms_before=0.246 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.252 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.245 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.298 worst_region_rms_after=0.299 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.298 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.299
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.298 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.298 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.246 arcsec matched=4312
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits N_match=4312 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.242 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.208 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=1045 n_q2=1214 n_q3=943 n_q4=1110 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4312 N_valid=4312 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.011 median_sep_arcsec=0.210 p95_sep_arcsec=0.797 n_q1=1045 n_q2=1214 n_q3=943 n_q4=1110 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-34-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_213616_TTUQ1b1x1_3051756_sOaCA4zo/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:53:21.75 -10:31:24.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:22:51.17 -08:49:08.5: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:47:22.59 -07:43:23.4: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:43:39.60 -15:17:04.6: 14.80 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:06:27.43 -12:03:18.5: 15.20 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:47:51.93 -10:47:44.1: 14.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:55:22.67 -09:52:40.8: 14.46 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:15:23.95 -10:14:35.2: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:23:15.40 -10:33:27.7: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:05:03.91 -14:38:39.1: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:43:39.60 -15:17:04.6: 14.55 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:05:03.91 -14:38:39.1: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:47:22.59 -07:43:23.4: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:22:51.17 -08:49:08.5: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:23:15.40 -10:33:27.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:53:21.75 -10:31:24.3: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:47:51.93 -10:47:44.1: 14.82 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:06:27.43 -12:03:18.5: 14.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:55:22.67 -09:52:40.8: 14.63 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:43:39.60 -15:17:04.6: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4337 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:15:23.95 -10:14:35.2: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:47:22.59 -07:43:23.4: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8051 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:22:51.17 -08:49:08.5: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4415 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:47:51.93 -10:47:44.1: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5498 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:55:22.67 -09:52:40.8: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6077 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:06:27.43 -12:03:18.5: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5488 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:36:44.22 -14:21:35.9: 14.82 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:34:47.26 -11:22:28.0: 14.40 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:48:11.47 -11:32:21.1: 14.77 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:34:17.44 -13:33:15.2: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:40:24.37 -10:04:11.3: 14.94 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:01:06.22 -14:38:16.4: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:34:47.26 -11:22:28.0: 14.38 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:01:06.22 -14:38:16.4: 14.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:36:44.22 -14:21:35.9: 14.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:48:11.47 -11:32:21.1: 14.90 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:34:17.44 -13:33:15.2: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:40:24.37 -10:04:11.3: 15.24 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:34:47.26 -11:22:28.0: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4900 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:01:06.22 -14:38:16.4: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5520 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:48:11.47 -11:32:21.1: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5501 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:36:44.22 -14:21:35.9: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5330 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:34:17.44 -13:33:15.2: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4710 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:24.37 -10:04:11.3: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5632 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:37:36.95 -12:48:40.7: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:45:04.29 -14:02:20.4: 14.82 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:21:35.60 -14:29:34.1: 14.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:22:11.34 -14:36:05.2: 15.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:38:14.56 -15:12:06.5: 14.45 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:40:50.61 -14:38:13.8: 14.82 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:21:35.60 -14:29:34.1: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:37:36.95 -12:48:40.7: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:38:14.56 -15:12:06.5: 14.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:21:35.60 -14:29:34.1: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5600 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:22:11.34 -14:36:05.2: 15.19 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:45:04.29 -14:02:20.4: 14.78 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:37:36.95 -12:48:40.7: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5662 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:40:50.61 -14:38:13.8: 14.70 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:38:14.56 -15:12:06.5: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4742 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:22:11.34 -14:36:05.2: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6216 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:45:04.29 -14:02:20.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6331 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:50.61 -14:38:13.8: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5300 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:08:42.43 -10:44:10.5: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:39:42.12 -11:11:06.6: 14.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:32:12.65 -09:54:09.2: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:34:46.14 -13:44:18.2: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:48:16.47 -05:18:37.5: 15.48 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:48:02.34 -13:19:58.2: 14.70 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:34:46.14 -13:44:18.2: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:32:12.65 -09:54:09.2: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:48:16.47 -05:18:37.5: 15.18 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:08:42.43 -10:44:10.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:34:46.14 -13:44:18.2: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7142 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:32:12.65 -09:54:09.2: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6066 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:39:42.12 -11:11:06.6: 15.25 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:48:02.34 -13:19:58.2: 14.77 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:48:16.47 -05:18:37.5: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.5655 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:39:42.12 -11:11:06.6: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6246 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:48:02.34 -13:19:58.2: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7266 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:54:54.12 -05:14:38.2: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:52:16.78 -12:40:54.2: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:53:35.52 -10:09:10.7: 14.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:27:25.72 -14:24:25.8: 15.09 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:40:01.47 -05:23:42.8: 15.08 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:54:54.12 -05:14:38.2: 14.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:52:16.78 -12:40:54.2: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:54:54.12 -05:14:38.2: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5155 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:53:35.52 -10:09:10.7: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:16.78 -12:40:54.2: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7109 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:27:25.72 -14:24:25.8: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:27:25.72 -14:24:25.8: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6854 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:53:35.52 -10:09:10.7: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6539 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:40:01.47 -05:23:42.8: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:01.47 -05:23:42.8: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7066 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:46:00.13 -13:16:03.7: 14.83 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:25:46.49 -13:28:59.5: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:40:38.54 -11:56:03.7: 14.94 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:40:44.60 -11:42:59.3: 15.19 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:42:51.13 -07:28:58.0: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:46:00.13 -13:16:03.7: 14.96 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:25:46.49 -13:28:59.5: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:46:00.13 -13:16:03.7: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6872 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:25:46.49 -13:28:59.5: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5705 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:40:38.54 -11:56:03.7: 14.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:40:44.60 -11:42:59.3: 15.28 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:44.60 -11:42:59.3: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7175 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:38.54 -11:56:03.7: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8018 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:42:51.13 -07:28:58.0: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:42:51.13 -07:28:58.0: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7825 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:12:59.76 -15:01:19.5: 15.21 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:34:39.07 -11:16:39.0: 15.12 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:41:10.63 -09:00:50.8: 14.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:33:16.74 -13:38:07.7: 14.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:45:25.13 -07:48:27.7: 15.14 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:12:59.76 -15:01:19.5: 15.34 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:12:59.76 -15:01:19.5: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7379 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:41:10.63 -09:00:50.8: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:33:16.74 -13:38:07.7: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:34:39.07 -11:16:39.0: 15.39 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:45:25.13 -07:48:27.7: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:33:16.74 -13:38:07.7: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7002 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:41:10.63 -09:00:50.8: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7740 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:34:39.07 -11:16:39.0: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7565 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:45:25.13 -07:48:27.7: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7296 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:41:45.18 -13:37:37.8: 14.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:41:15.00 -13:37:01.0: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:52:27.96 -06:09:21.1: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:27:55.91 -14:03:29.7: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:46:30.21 -06:28:46.5: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:41:45.18 -13:37:37.8: 14.91 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:52:27.96 -06:09:21.1: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:41:45.18 -13:37:37.8: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7188 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:27.96 -06:09:21.1: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7362 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:27:55.91 -14:03:29.7: 14.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:41:15.00 -13:37:01.0: 14.76 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:46:30.21 -06:28:46.5: 15.05 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.24
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:41:15.00 -13:37:01.0: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7665 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:46:30.21 -06:28:46.5: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.24 new_mean_mag=14.7941 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:27:55.91 -14:03:29.7: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6501 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:41:21.92 -11:08:57.4: 14.94 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:23:44.57 -14:49:40.8: 15.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:34:06.87 -13:46:24.5: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:48:02.92 -06:16:36.8: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:41:21.92 -11:08:57.4: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:35:54.47 -07:57:49.9: 15.40 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:41:21.92 -11:08:57.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8129 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:23:44.57 -14:49:40.8: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:23:44.57 -14:49:40.8: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7727 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:48:02.92 -06:16:36.8: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:34:06.87 -13:46:24.5: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:48:02.92 -06:16:36.8: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6211 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:34:06.87 -13:46:24.5: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7195 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:35:54.47 -07:57:49.9: 15.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:35:54.47 -07:57:49.9: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8404 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:57:36.73 -11:05:18.6: 15.26 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:55:34.38 -13:11:21.7: 14.35 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:04:24.54 -14:09:22.3: 15.09 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:59:16.02 -13:28:36.2: 15.18 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:55:34.38 -13:11:21.7: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:58:16.71 -07:33:54.7: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:55:34.38 -13:11:21.7: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6660 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:04:24.54 -14:09:22.3: 15.04 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:57:36.73 -11:05:18.6: 15.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:57:36.73 -11:05:18.6: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7733 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:04:24.54 -14:09:22.3: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7502 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:59:16.02 -13:28:36.2: 15.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:59:16.02 -13:28:36.2: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8086 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:58:16.71 -07:33:54.7: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:58:16.71 -07:33:54.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6270 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53450.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53608.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53710.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53917.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54109.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 35s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53376_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 53376_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53377_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 53377_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53378_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 53378_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53450_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
Preparing report for the candidate 53450_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53532_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 53532_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53608_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
Preparing report for the candidate 53608_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53710_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
Preparing report for the candidate 53710_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53917_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
Preparing report for the candidate 53917_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54013_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54013_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54053_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54053_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54058_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54058_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54059_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54059_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54065_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54065_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54066_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54066_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54070_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54070_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54072_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54072_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54077_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54077_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54086_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54086_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54096_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54096_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54100_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54100_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54101_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54101_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54106_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54106_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54109_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
Preparing report for the candidate 54109_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54112_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54112_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54121_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54121_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54124_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54124_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54125_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54125_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54131_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54131_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54133_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54133_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54134_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54134_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54135_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54135_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54151_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54151_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54154_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54154_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54155_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54155_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54157_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54157_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54172_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54172_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54173_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54173_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54182_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54182_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54183_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54183_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54185_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54185_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54187_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54187_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54189_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54189_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54195_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54195_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54198_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54198_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54203_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54203_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54206_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54206_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54209_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54209_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54210_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54210_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54213_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54213_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54215_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54215_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54220_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54220_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54221_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54221_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54225_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54225_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54226_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54226_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54242_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54242_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54252_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54252_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54256_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54256_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54273_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 54273_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40798_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172
The candidate 40798_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_21-35-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0172 did not pass the final checks