This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.1136 2461347.6136 11.52 05:05:00.27 +26:07:49.3
177.30180 -9.03590 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales 2 -0 2 11.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:00.27 +26:07:49.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:00.27 +26:07:49.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.1136* 05 05 00.27 +26 07 49.3 11.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.6136,11.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.1136 11.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.1136 2461347.6136 13.69 04:37:01.27 +30:30:52.8
169.92304 -11.11714 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1189 Terentia 2 1 2 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:37:01.27 +30:30:52.8: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:37:01.27 +30:30:52.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.1136* 04 37 01.27 +30 30 52.8 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.6136,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.1136 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.1136 2461347.6136 12.80 04:29:09.20 +29:55:34.3
169.22222 -12.77994 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana -0 -0 0 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:29:09.20 +29:55:34.3: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:29:09.20 +29:55:34.3: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.1136* 04 29 09.20 +29 55 34.3 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.6136,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.1136 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.1136 2461347.6136 13.08 05:08:39.26 +31:34:46.6
173.35690 -5.16116 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.359 Georgia 0 -1 1 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:08:39.26 +31:34:46.6: 16.02 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:08:39.26 +31:34:46.6: 15.83 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.91 +/- 0.20
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.6136,13.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.1136 13.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.1136 2461347.6136 13.38 05:04:44.10 +25:28:23.0
177.80219 -9.47387 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 5.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J0504443+252824
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.844 R1 Y 0.786 R1 167.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:44.10 +25:28:23.0: 15.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:44.10 +25:28:23.0: 15.20 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.1136* 05 04 44.10 +25 28 23.0 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0504443+252824,2461347.6136,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0504443+252824 20261103.1136 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461347.61385862 03.11.2026 02:43:47.385 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 26
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15245
Objects passed selection criteria: 15186
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12029.8
Average stars matched: 11716 (97.3919 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240828 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Nov 2 21:53:14 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461347.61385862 03.11.2026 02:43:47.385 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 96
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 293 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 116628
Objects passed selection criteria: 116394
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 88185.5
Average stars matched: 83866 (95.1018 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 512988 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Nov 2 22:00:30 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.61329479
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Image size: 947.0'x627.1' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:24.172 +29:58:49.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:24.172 +29:58:49.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0847 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Image size: 946.8'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:24.415 +29:58:09.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:24.415 +29:58:09.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0880 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:24.172 +29:58:49.17
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:24.415 +29:58:09.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01093 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kZEYKBMWVH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zXiwaFReg9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FxLLpiqKON
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hAczDbUpYI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg
Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 23 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
3.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
3.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.kZEYKBMWVH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=0, passed=16295
Got 16295 stars (including 14768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4801 N_valid=4801 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.256 p95_sep_arcsec=1.309 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zXiwaFReg9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=0, passed=16349
Got 16349 stars (including 14839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4800 N_valid=4800 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.258 p95_sep_arcsec=1.293 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FxLLpiqKON (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=297, bad_region=0, passed=7877
Got 7877 stars (including 7575 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7877 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 947.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 947.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013153 (47.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010522 (37.9 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4777 stars left (next iteration limit 5247)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=9.357 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.210 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.210 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=1.156 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.942 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.727 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.696 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.959 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.959 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4777 robust_rms_before=2.587 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.564 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.696 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.866 worst_region_rms_after=0.959 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.949 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.959
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.866 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.866 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.564 arcsec matched=4777
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits N_match=4777 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.793 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.628 n_q1=761 n_q2=844 n_q3=1172 n_q4=2000 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.461
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4777 N_valid=4777 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.089 bias_dec_arcsec=0.583 median_sep_arcsec=2.232 p95_sep_arcsec=6.446 n_q1=761 n_q2=844 n_q3=1172 n_q4=2000 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hAczDbUpYI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=298, bad_region=0, passed=7909
Got 7909 stars (including 7607 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7909 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 946.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 946.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013150 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010520 (37.9 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5251)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=9.345 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.986 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.986 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.913 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.548 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.548 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.663 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.983 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.900 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4779 robust_rms_before=2.405 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.553 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.663 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.849 worst_region_rms_after=0.983 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.808 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.900
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.849 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.849 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.553 arcsec matched=4779
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.827 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.611 n_q1=751 n_q2=849 n_q3=1166 n_q4=2013 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.508
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4779 N_valid=4779 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.174 bias_dec_arcsec=0.592 median_sep_arcsec=2.062 p95_sep_arcsec=6.078 n_q1=751 n_q2=849 n_q3=1166 n_q4=2013 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.114
ref2=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new1=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits sigma_overall=0.543 worst_q_ratio=1.461
new2=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits sigma_overall=0.548 worst_q_ratio=1.508
reference average sigma_overall=0.37 worst_q_ratio=1.1215
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4801 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125_astrometric_residuals.png (4777 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126_astrometric_residuals.png (4779 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:33:30.75 +25:28:21.1: 9.58 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:33:49.83 +25:01:57.6: 9.91 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:33:17.45 +24:44:12.3: 10.38 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:32:16.78 +24:41:17.8: 11.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:32:10.63 +24:59:19.8: 9.36 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:32:00.42 +24:59:25.4: 9.53 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:34:08.97 +25:35:17.3: 10.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:33:17.45 +24:44:12.3: 10.37 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.38 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:17.45 +24:44:12.3: ref_mag=10.38 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6649 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:32:16.78 +24:41:17.8: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.17 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:16.78 +24:41:17.8: ref_mag=11.17 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7294 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:32:10.63 +24:59:19.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:10.63 +24:59:19.8: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:33:30.75 +25:28:21.1: 9.59 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:33:07.17 +25:07:27.7: 10.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.58 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:33:49.83 +25:01:57.6: 9.89 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:30.75 +25:28:21.1: ref_mag=9.58 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9458 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.90 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:32:00.42 +24:59:25.4: 9.54 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:49.83 +25:01:57.6: ref_mag=9.90 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8032 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.53 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:00.42 +24:59:25.4: ref_mag=9.53 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1074 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:34:08.97 +25:35:17.3: 10.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.23 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:08.97 +25:35:17.3: ref_mag=10.23 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8277 delta=-0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:33:07.17 +25:07:27.7: 10.80 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.81 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:07.17 +25:07:27.7: ref_mag=10.81 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9540 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:32:44.94 +24:36:35.8: 10.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:33:19.42 +25:11:17.1: 10.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:00.27 +26:07:49.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:32:44.94 +24:36:35.8: 10.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.71 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:44.94 +24:36:35.8: ref_mag=10.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0103 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:32:20.99 +24:48:32.1: 10.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:33:59.78 +25:37:34.1: 10.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:33:19.42 +25:11:17.1: 10.68 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.68 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:19.42 +25:11:17.1: ref_mag=10.68 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2182 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:00.27 +26:07:49.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:32:20.99 +24:48:32.1: 10.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.90 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:20.99 +24:48:32.1: ref_mag=10.90 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3592 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:33:59.78 +25:37:34.1: 10.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.75 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:59.78 +25:37:34.1: ref_mag=10.75 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2954 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21217.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 63s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 21119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:30.19 +24:37:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21132_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 21132_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21136_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 21136_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21138_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 21138_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21141_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 21141_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21159_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 21159_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:11.22 +31:27:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21160_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 21160_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21169_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 21169_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21172_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 21172_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21173_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 21173_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21182_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 21182_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 21196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.53 +28:42:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21199_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 21199_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21207_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 21207_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21212_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 21212_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21217_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 21217_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21225_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 21225_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21227_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 21227_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20856_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 20856_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:25.00 +31:53:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10680_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 10680_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:33.78 +29:20:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 15527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.45 +26:08:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.40 +34:08:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.61 +30:42:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 66s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:05:00.27 +26:07:49.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Image size: 947.0'x627.1' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:24.172 +29:58:49.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:24.172 +29:58:49.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0847 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Image size: 946.8'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:24.415 +29:58:09.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:24.415 +29:58:09.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0880 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:24.172 +29:58:49.17
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:24.415 +29:58:09.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01093 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aZkld56qQn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tFkm5XUAjD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jmA3Zcx898
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits &> /tmp/tmp.InV6OE8SSL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6871 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6871 out of 129003 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6871 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6871 out of 129003 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.2955 deg
Loaded 8479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4936 out of 6879 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6879 out of 129055 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 91 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
3.0 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
3.0 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.8 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.aZkld56qQn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=9, passed=128967
Got 128967 stars (including 114713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4788 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4788 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1870 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1152 n_q4=731 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4788 N_valid=4788 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.007 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.245 p95_sep_arcsec=1.190 n_q1=1870 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1152 n_q4=731 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tFkm5XUAjD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=12, passed=129020
Got 129020 stars (including 114961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1874 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1148 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4791 N_valid=4791 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.253 p95_sep_arcsec=1.164 n_q1=1874 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1148 n_q4=723 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jmA3Zcx898 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2419, bad_region=42, passed=48789
Got 48789 stars (including 46268 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48789 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 947.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 947.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013153 (47.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010522 (37.9 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4771 stars left (next iteration limit 5237)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=9.455 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.443 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.443 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=1.093 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.981 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.604 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.686 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.926 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.924 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4771 robust_rms_before=2.568 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.558 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.686 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.832 worst_region_rms_after=0.926 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.934 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.924
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.832 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.832 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.558 arcsec matched=4771
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits N_match=4771 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.799 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.618 n_q1=779 n_q2=821 n_q3=1219 n_q4=1952 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.471
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4771 N_valid=4771 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.119 bias_dec_arcsec=0.575 median_sep_arcsec=2.214 p95_sep_arcsec=6.316 n_q1=779 n_q2=821 n_q3=1219 n_q4=1952 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.InV6OE8SSL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2433, bad_region=44, passed=48507
Got 48507 stars (including 45976 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48507 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 946.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 946.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013150 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010520 (37.9 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4777 stars left (next iteration limit 5248)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=9.422 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.447 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.447 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.883 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.430 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.430 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.660 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.977 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.860 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4777 robust_rms_before=2.385 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.539 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.660 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.834 worst_region_rms_after=0.977 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.828 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.860
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.834 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.834 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.539 arcsec matched=4777
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits N_match=4777 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.802 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.586 n_q1=776 n_q2=830 n_q3=1219 n_q4=1952 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.483
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4777 N_valid=4777 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.175 bias_dec_arcsec=0.584 median_sep_arcsec=2.051 p95_sep_arcsec=6.000 n_q1=776 n_q2=830 n_q3=1219 n_q4=1952 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-42-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_204431_TTUQ1b1x1_4109425_F3pVFHSf/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:16.28 +32:38:12.5: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:38:34.78 +29:08:47.7: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:37:01.27 +30:30:52.8: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:22:23.11 +30:34:12.9: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:27:41.00 +34:19:29.6: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:29:09.20 +29:55:34.3: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:16.28 +32:38:12.5: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:29:09.20 +29:55:34.3: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:37:01.27 +30:30:52.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:22:23.11 +30:34:12.9: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:38:34.78 +29:08:47.7: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:27:41.00 +34:19:29.6: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:16.28 +32:38:12.5: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9873 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:22:23.11 +30:34:12.9: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3058 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:34.78 +29:08:47.7: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4316 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:41.00 +34:19:29.6: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8241 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:08:39.26 +31:34:46.6: 16.02 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:58:09.61 +29:02:18.9: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:50.08 +29:58:33.7: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:08:39.26 +31:34:46.6: 15.83 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.91 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:08:39.26 +31:34:46.6: ref_mag=15.91 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.0778 delta=2.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:58:09.61 +29:02:18.9: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:58:09.61 +29:02:18.9: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1940 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:50.08 +29:58:33.7: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:50.08 +29:58:33.7: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3145 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:49:26.68 +29:42:09.9: 13.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:49:26.68 +29:42:09.9: 13.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:26.68 +29:42:09.9: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7143 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:44.10 +25:28:23.0: 15.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:44.10 +25:28:23.0: 15.20 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:04:44.10 +25:28:23.0: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3716 delta=1.79 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151130.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151732.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out152281.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out97638.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 61s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151099_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151099_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:28.01 +33:03:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151120_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151120_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151121_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151121_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151130_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 151130_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151138_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151138_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:37.03 +33:23:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151150_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151150_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151153_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151153_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151407_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151407_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:57.85 +33:05:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151446_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151446_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:00.23 +26:07:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151471_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151471_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.43 +34:26:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151494_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151494_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151526_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151526_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.89 +34:09:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151587_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151587_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:25.52 +34:49:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151623_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151623_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (81.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151628_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151628_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:56.88 +33:06:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151648_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151648_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:29.75 +32:42:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151666_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151666_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.69 +32:33:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151732_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 151732_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151738_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151738_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:25.02 +30:30:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151739_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151739_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.90 +26:54:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151775_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151775_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:46.49 +31:23:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151787_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151787_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:22.03 +28:31:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151835_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151835_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.71 +34:23:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151955_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 151955_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:26.42 +34:06:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152004_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 152004_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.98 +26:25:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152052_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 152052_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.46 +33:11:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152127_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 152127_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:41.75 +34:15:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152148_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 152148_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:55.00 +32:26:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152150_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 152150_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.93 +29:47:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152184_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 152184_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.73 +29:45:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152198_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 152198_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.06 +33:56:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152281_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 152281_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152291_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 152291_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:36.63 +30:33:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152297_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 152297_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 152342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.25 +31:44:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152394_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 152394_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:36.05 +31:24:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152545_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 152545_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152586_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 152586_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:27.63 +34:00:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 152722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:22.23 +29:33:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152794_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 152794_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.24 +31:04:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152954_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 152954_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:41.79 +28:20:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141163_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 141163_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:26.03 +29:15:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:47.53 +26:45:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.60 +31:18:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54729_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 54729_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:01.99 +31:29:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57431_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 57431_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:58.15 +31:19:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 33767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:29.69 +32:44:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144771_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 144771_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.30 +32:10:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:51.00 +26:46:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143126_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 143126_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (75.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121158_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 121158_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:28.86 +27:58:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61400_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 61400_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:02.77 +30:45:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:14.30 +32:02:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62859_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 62859_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:21.38 +30:55:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140161_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 140161_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:12.52 +34:32:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103686_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 103686_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:41.65 +26:45:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 81767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 113941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:57.76 +27:26:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:08.99 +25:22:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 123731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:50.74 +28:10:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.33 +25:24:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59385_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 59385_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76531_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 76531_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:37.58 +29:52:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37569_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 37569_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:08.75 +32:28:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.53 +28:42:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:11.42 +33:50:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84209_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 84209_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:29.83 +29:26:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49024_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 49024_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:25.02 +31:53:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:12.41 +25:58:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39496_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 39496_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:17.50 +32:11:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.41 +35:03:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 89704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:35.86 +29:00:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.45 +26:08:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51042_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 51042_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:03.31 +31:38:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87999_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 87999_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:20.62 +29:14:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97638_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 97638_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:49.95 +30:05:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:16.51 +27:22:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:26.29 +31:29:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110419_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 110419_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:52.42 +27:07:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30241_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 30241_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:25.11 +32:57:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12426_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 12426_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:00.21 +33:56:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 113795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:57.07 +27:27:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 66229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:56.08 +30:38:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:49.59 +34:37:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119522_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 119522_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:22.66 +27:44:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100001_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 100001_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.42 +34:08:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.65 +30:42:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:19.94 +34:08:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126
The candidate 33758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_20-43-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126 did not pass the final checks
