This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.0379 2461347.5379 13.38 18:09:53.21 -11:30:20.7
17.94150 3.80121 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche 1 -1 1 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:09:53.21 -11:30:20.7: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:09:53.21 -11:30:20.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.0379* 18 09 53.21 -11 30 20.7 13.4 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.5379,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.0379 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.0379 2461347.5379 13.80 18:02:42.12 -05:27:03.0
22.43208 8.26023 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J1802423-052700
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.614 R1 Y 1.927 R1 283.000000000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:02:42.12 -05:27:03.0: 15.65 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:02:42.12 -05:27:03.0: 15.31 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.19
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1802423-052700,2461347.5379,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1802423-052700 20261103.0379 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.0379 2461347.5379 14.04 17:49:48.28 -05:26:44.3
20.87050 11.07686 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 7.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J1749484-052642
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.931 R1 Y 1.876 R1 436.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:49:48.28 -05:26:44.3: 15.29 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:49:48.28 -05:26:44.3: 15.09 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.15
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1749484-052642,2461347.5379,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1749484-052642 20261103.0379 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.74939258 13.07.2026 05:58:57.519 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
First image: 2461234.74939258 13.07.2026 05:58:57.519 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Last image: 2461347.53823014 03.11.2026 00:54:53.084 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11048
Objects passed selection criteria: 11029
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8894.5
Average stars matched: 8635.25 (97.0853 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236740 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Nov 2 19:00:47 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.74939258 13.07.2026 05:58:57.519 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
First image: 2461234.74939258 13.07.2026 05:58:57.519 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Last image: 2461347.53823014 03.11.2026 00:54:53.084 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 139
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 36 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 100444
Objects passed selection criteria: 100282
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 86567.2
Average stars matched: 82688 (95.5188 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 497236 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Nov 2 19:02:25 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.53754572
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.687 -09:58:38.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:11.276 -10:00:09.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.687 -09:58:38.45
Second-epoch image center 18:00:11.276 -10:00:09.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0539 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:09.105 -09:59:36.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.687 -09:58:38.45
Second-epoch image center 18:00:09.105 -09:59:36.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0419 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:11.276 -10:00:09.55
Second-epoch second image center 18:00:09.105 -09:59:36.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01276 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qo0yqoyQVg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aLKCaW85aZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZqhVlSPltO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UxyDA1Fyi7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9175 to 278.0936 deg, Dec -15.2386 to -4.6928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9175 to 278.0936 deg, Dec -15.2386 to -4.6928 deg
Loaded 6268 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4884 out of 5253 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5253 out of 11492 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.672350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.672350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9175 to 278.0936 deg, Dec -15.2386 to -4.6928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9175 to 278.0936 deg, Dec -15.2386 to -4.6928 deg
Loaded 6268 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4884 out of 5253 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5253 out of 11492 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 11483 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9404 to 278.0994 deg, Dec -15.2281 to -4.6882 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9404 to 278.0994 deg, Dec -15.2281 to -4.6882 deg
Loaded 6246 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4876 out of 5238 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5238 out of 11483 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
2.2 pix Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
15.1 mag. Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.qo0yqoyQVg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1021, bad_region=0, passed=11492
Got 11492 stars (including 10449 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11492 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4806 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4723 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
Excluding outliers - 4724 stars left (next iteration limit 5195)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits N_match=4724 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.749 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.772 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.755 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.681 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.817 n_q1=662 n_q2=656 n_q3=2113 n_q4=1293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4724 N_valid=4724 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.066 bias_dec_arcsec=0.041 median_sep_arcsec=0.468 p95_sep_arcsec=5.264 n_q1=662 n_q2=656 n_q3=2113 n_q4=1293 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aLKCaW85aZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1012, bad_region=0, passed=11483
Got 11483 stars (including 10449 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11483 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Excluding outliers - 4720 stars left (next iteration limit 5190)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=4720 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.717 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.760 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.719 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.808 n_q1=670 n_q2=663 n_q3=2090 n_q4=1297 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4720 N_valid=4720 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.018 bias_dec_arcsec=0.026 median_sep_arcsec=0.457 p95_sep_arcsec=5.302 n_q1=670 n_q2=663 n_q3=2090 n_q4=1297 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZqhVlSPltO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=513, bad_region=0, passed=6271
Got 6271 stars (including 5747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6271 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6271 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6271 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6271 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4726 stars left (next iteration limit 5198)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4726 robust_rms=12.585 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.647 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.647 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4726 robust_rms=0.649 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.835 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.835 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4726 robust_rms=0.375 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.534 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.534 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4726 robust_rms_before=0.753 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.520 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.375 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.825 worst_region_rms_after=0.534 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.056 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.534
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.sip_refit.pHrYVu/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.sip_refit.pHrYVu/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:11.276 -10:00:10.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6271 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.sip_refit.pHrYVu/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_635740.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.sip_refit.pHrYVu/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.orFfu9' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_635740.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.753 -> 0.375 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4726 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4426 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4426 pairs (4726 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4426 robust_rms=11.809 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.040 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.040 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4426 robust_rms=0.637 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.796 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.796 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4426 robust_rms=0.366 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.517 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.517 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4426 robust_rms_before=0.366 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.366 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.366 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.514 worst_region_rms_after=0.517 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.514 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.517
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.517 vs 0.514 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4426 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6271 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4426 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6271 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits N_match=4426 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.406 n_q1=619 n_q2=606 n_q3=2135 n_q4=1066 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4426 N_valid=4426 bias_ra_arcsec=0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=0.014 median_sep_arcsec=0.303 p95_sep_arcsec=1.127 n_q1=619 n_q2=606 n_q3=2135 n_q4=1066 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.UxyDA1Fyi7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=526, bad_region=0, passed=6703
Got 6703 stars (including 6163 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6703 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4721 stars left (next iteration limit 5197)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=12.418 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.685 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.685 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=0.656 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.855 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.855 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=0.379 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.549 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.549 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4721 robust_rms_before=0.755 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.504 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.379 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.785 worst_region_rms_after=0.549 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.107 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.549
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.sip_refit.qtVyBQ/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.sip_refit.qtVyBQ/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:09.099 -09:59:37.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6703 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.sip_refit.qtVyBQ/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_635829.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.sip_refit.qtVyBQ/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.wVRPiB' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_635829.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.755 -> 0.379 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4721 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4420 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4420 pairs (4721 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4420 robust_rms=11.633 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.780 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.780 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4420 robust_rms=0.644 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.809 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.809 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4420 robust_rms=0.370 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.515 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.515 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4420 robust_rms_before=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.370 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.515 worst_region_rms_after=0.515 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.515 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.515
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.sip_refit.bUsN5x/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.sip_refit.bUsN5x/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:09.099 -09:59:37.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6703 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.sip_refit.bUsN5x/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_636632.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.sip_refit.bUsN5x/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.WOve0v' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_636632.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.370 -> 0.370 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4420 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4420 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits N_match=4420 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=625 n_q2=602 n_q3=2141 n_q4=1052 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4420 N_valid=4420 bias_ra_arcsec=0.007 bias_dec_arcsec=0.008 median_sep_arcsec=0.304 p95_sep_arcsec=1.084 n_q1=625 n_q2=602 n_q3=2141 n_q4=1052 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits sigma_overall=0.749 worst_q_ratio=1.089
ref2=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits sigma_overall=0.717 worst_q_ratio=1.126
new1=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.133
new2=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.095
reference average sigma_overall=0.733 worst_q_ratio=1.1075
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022_astrometric_residuals.png (4724 matched stars from wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.69 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023_astrometric_residuals.png (4720 matched stars from wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.66 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017_astrometric_residuals.png (4426 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018_astrometric_residuals.png (4420 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20692_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 20692_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:33.19 -13:53:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20749_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 20749_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:02.32 -13:23:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20816_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 20816_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:24.35 -09:54:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20827_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 20827_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:02.69 -05:12:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20853_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 20853_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:40.27 -13:48:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20913_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 20913_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:05.87 -13:10:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20921_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 20921_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:11.39 -10:00:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.687 -09:58:38.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:11.276 -10:00:10.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.687 -09:58:38.45
Second-epoch image center 18:00:11.276 -10:00:10.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0539 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:09.099 -09:59:37.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.687 -09:58:38.45
Second-epoch image center 18:00:09.099 -09:59:37.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0419 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:11.276 -10:00:10.07
Second-epoch second image center 18:00:09.099 -09:59:37.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01279 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sVDh2aBOJ7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zdUetm8XAL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j20jwtWaAO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SYrlo7Kazf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 110241 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9146 to 278.0954 deg, Dec -15.2422 to -4.6809 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9146 to 278.0954 deg, Dec -15.2422 to -4.6809 deg
Loaded 6276 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4437 out of 5570 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5570 out of 110241 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.499500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.499500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 110241 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9146 to 278.0954 deg, Dec -15.2422 to -4.6809 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9146 to 278.0954 deg, Dec -15.2422 to -4.6809 deg
Loaded 6276 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4437 out of 5570 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5570 out of 110241 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 109592 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9404 to 278.1110 deg, Dec -15.2285 to -4.6661 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9404 to 278.1110 deg, Dec -15.2285 to -4.6661 deg
Loaded 6261 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4435 out of 5554 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5554 out of 109592 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 128 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
2.1 pix Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
15.2 mag. Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.sVDh2aBOJ7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=9427, bad_region=0, passed=110223
Got 110223 stars (including 100601 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 110223 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 4739 stars left (next iteration limit 5212)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits N_match=4739 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.695 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.736 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.748 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.628 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.775 n_q1=704 n_q2=723 n_q3=2014 n_q4=1298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4739 N_valid=4739 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.068 bias_dec_arcsec=0.048 median_sep_arcsec=0.460 p95_sep_arcsec=4.161 n_q1=704 n_q2=723 n_q3=2014 n_q4=1298 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zdUetm8XAL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=9439, bad_region=0, passed=109569
Got 109569 stars (including 99918 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 109569 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4739 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 4738 stars left (next iteration limit 5211)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=4738 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.686 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.684 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.736 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.601 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.786 n_q1=708 n_q2=717 n_q3=2017 n_q4=1296 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4738 N_valid=4738 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.015 bias_dec_arcsec=0.029 median_sep_arcsec=0.449 p95_sep_arcsec=3.817 n_q1=708 n_q2=717 n_q3=2017 n_q4=1296 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.j20jwtWaAO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=3457, bad_region=9, passed=63292
Got 63292 stars (including 59674 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63292 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4736 stars left (next iteration limit 5209)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4736 robust_rms=12.599 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.289 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.289 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4736 robust_rms=0.649 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.825 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.825 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4736 robust_rms=0.368 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.529 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.529 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4736 robust_rms_before=0.369 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.489 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.368 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.530 worst_region_rms_after=0.529 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.530 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.529
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.530 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.530 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.369 arcsec matched=4736
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits N_match=4736 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=712 n_q2=673 n_q3=2210 n_q4=1141 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4736 N_valid=4736 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=0.026 median_sep_arcsec=0.314 p95_sep_arcsec=2.754 n_q1=712 n_q2=673 n_q3=2210 n_q4=1141 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.SYrlo7Kazf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3705, bad_region=16, passed=66456
Got 66456 stars (including 62582 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66456 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4736 stars left (next iteration limit 5209)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4736 robust_rms=12.736 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.627 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.627 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4736 robust_rms=0.651 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.867 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.867 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4736 robust_rms=0.379 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.554 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.554 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4736 robust_rms_before=0.380 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.487 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.379 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.560 worst_region_rms_after=0.554 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.560 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.554
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.560 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.560 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.380 arcsec matched=4736
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits N_match=4736 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.450 n_q1=724 n_q2=680 n_q3=2189 n_q4=1143 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4736 N_valid=4736 bias_ra_arcsec=0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=0.023 median_sep_arcsec=0.318 p95_sep_arcsec=3.142 n_q1=724 n_q2=680 n_q3=2189 n_q4=1143 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_185531_TTUQ1b1x1_482375_1wqrhEE3/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:01:19.78 -08:17:38.9: 14.37 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:23:19.21 -09:45:41.4: 13.42 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:07:44.41 -11:33:27.4: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:15:33.65 -11:26:32.8: 14.23 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:02:22.58 -08:05:46.6: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:46:32.70 -07:11:13.2: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:24:08.68 -06:42:39.9: 14.17 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:15:33.65 -11:26:32.8: 14.10 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:46:32.70 -07:11:13.2: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:02:22.58 -08:05:46.6: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:15:33.65 -11:26:32.8: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2095 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:01:19.78 -08:17:38.9: 14.30 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:46:32.70 -07:11:13.2: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1877 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:02:22.58 -08:05:46.6: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9158 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:01:19.78 -08:17:38.9: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2407 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:24:08.68 -06:42:39.9: 14.12 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:07:44.41 -11:33:27.4: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:23:19.21 -09:45:41.4: 13.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:24:08.68 -06:42:39.9: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2093 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:07:44.41 -11:33:27.4: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8979 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:23:19.21 -09:45:41.4: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6447 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:20:34.51 -11:23:56.4: 13.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:29:03.08 -15:01:35.8: 13.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:20:34.51 -11:23:56.4: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:20:34.51 -11:23:56.4: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5438 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:29:03.08 -15:01:35.8: 13.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:29:03.08 -15:01:35.8: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3597 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:51:33.93 -06:50:24.4: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:16:49.24 -11:13:24.7: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:22:47.18 -11:19:15.8: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:09:51.61 -15:12:27.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:51:33.93 -06:50:24.4: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:51:33.93 -06:50:24.4: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4872 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:16:49.24 -11:13:24.7: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:16:49.24 -11:13:24.7: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3165 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:22:47.18 -11:19:15.8: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:22:47.18 -11:19:15.8: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8929 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:09:51.61 -15:12:27.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:09:51.61 -15:12:27.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:17:59.37 -11:17:34.2: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:30:53.91 -14:58:28.4: 12.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:17:55.65 -12:00:07.9: 13.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:17:59.37 -11:17:34.2: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:17:59.37 -11:17:34.2: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9328 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:30:53.91 -14:58:28.4: 12.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:30:53.91 -14:58:28.4: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0000 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:17:55.65 -12:00:07.9: 13.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:17:55.65 -12:00:07.9: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0919 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:14:30.07 -15:10:12.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:29:20.21 -14:30:04.6: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:20:13.61 -14:49:59.0: 13.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:14:30.07 -15:10:12.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:14:30.07 -15:10:12.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:29:20.21 -14:30:04.6: 13.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:29:20.21 -14:30:04.6: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1130 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:20:13.61 -14:49:59.0: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:20:13.61 -14:49:59.0: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0451 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:09:53.21 -11:30:20.7: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:12:05.61 -14:28:53.4: 13.55 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:09:53.21 -11:30:20.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:07:00.72 -06:30:39.5: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:12:05.61 -14:28:53.4: 13.55 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:12:05.61 -14:28:53.4: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5267 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:07:00.72 -06:30:39.5: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:07:00.72 -06:30:39.5: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7948 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:22:23.08 -09:29:30.5: 13.69 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:30:52.41 -14:57:54.5: 13.87 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:21:52.52 -10:25:27.1: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:22:23.08 -09:29:30.5: 13.71 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:22:23.08 -09:29:30.5: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7427 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:30:52.41 -14:57:54.5: 14.05 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:30:52.41 -14:57:54.5: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6611 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:21:52.52 -10:25:27.1: 13.74 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:21:52.52 -10:25:27.1: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8255 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:02:42.12 -05:27:03.0: 15.65 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:02:42.12 -05:27:03.0: 15.31 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:02:42.12 -05:27:03.0: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.7851 delta=1.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:26:49.17 -08:21:43.9: 14.28 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:31:30.13 -09:18:06.6: 13.73 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:29:01.03 -14:46:06.1: 14.21 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:26:49.17 -08:21:43.9: 14.25 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:26:49.17 -08:21:43.9: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0794 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:49:48.28 -05:26:44.3: 15.29 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:31:30.13 -09:18:06.6: 13.78 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:31:30.13 -09:18:06.6: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0383 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:25:05.03 -05:35:24.9: 14.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:29:01.03 -14:46:06.1: 14.45 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:29:01.03 -14:46:06.1: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.9694 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:49:48.28 -05:26:44.3: 15.09 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:49:48.28 -05:26:44.3: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.0320 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 17:59:23.86 -08:19:10.3: 14.51 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:25:05.03 -05:35:24.9: 14.90 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:25:05.03 -05:35:24.9: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3593 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-58-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits at 18:03:56.43 -10:47:10.4: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 17:59:23.86 -08:19:10.3: 14.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:59:23.86 -08:19:10.3: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3520 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 18:03:56.43 -10:47:10.4: 14.75 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:03:56.43 -10:47:10.4: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4189 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133943.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out134593.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out134777.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 62s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132035_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132035_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132041_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132041_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132043_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132043_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132045_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132045_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132051_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132051_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132055_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132055_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132056_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132056_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:05.93 -05:14:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132065_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132065_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:57.69 -06:35:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132067_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132067_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:42.51 -10:13:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132076_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132076_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132089_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132089_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132090_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132090_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:47.75 -13:26:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132094_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132094_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132097_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132097_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132106_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132106_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132116_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132116_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:37.75 -10:49:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132117_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132117_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:34.14 -10:14:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132120_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132120_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132125_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132125_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:42.65 -04:52:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132127_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132127_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:47.08 -13:52:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132129_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132129_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132130_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132130_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:06.51 -14:49:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132347_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132347_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:40.33 -13:48:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132405_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132405_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:05.88 -13:10:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132500_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132500_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:14.64 -14:20:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132507_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132507_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:36.17 -05:33:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132523_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132523_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:57.05 -07:05:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132639_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132639_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:06.72 -14:25:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132698_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132698_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:12.63 -14:40:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132708_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132708_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:43.79 -14:26:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132734_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132734_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:21.31 -13:12:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132905_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132905_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:58.03 -08:30:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132941_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 132941_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:48.53 -14:12:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133004_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133004_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:11.25 -09:37:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133056_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133056_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:24.10 -05:45:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133084_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133084_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:46.67 -05:56:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133178_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133178_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:29.59 -14:52:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133203_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133203_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:18.85 -05:30:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133208_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133208_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:15.43 -13:00:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133288_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133288_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133290_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133290_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:07.54 -13:51:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133327_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133327_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133365_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133365_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:50.87 -10:52:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133375_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133375_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:00.51 -14:10:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133409_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133409_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:05.91 -08:33:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133443_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133443_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:54.12 -14:37:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133493_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133493_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133507_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133507_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:44.89 -05:00:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133553_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133553_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:22.32 -09:57:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133562_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133562_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:17.24 -14:02:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133572_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133572_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:59.13 -14:56:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133587_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133587_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:05.32 -13:40:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133593_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133593_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:06.98 -05:26:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133597_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133597_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:57.14 -13:28:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133618_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133618_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:33.56 -14:03:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133625_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133625_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:04.98 -11:54:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133655_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133655_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:57.87 -07:14:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133670_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133670_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:54.62 -12:21:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133690_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133690_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:31.78 -15:03:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133707_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133707_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133713_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133713_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133722_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133722_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133737_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133737_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:37.77 -09:21:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133749_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133749_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:16.95 -08:11:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133776_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133776_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:29.39 -08:49:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133778_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133778_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:25.10 -13:36:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133785_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133785_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:37.66 -08:24:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133806_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133806_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:02.67 -12:48:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133810_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133810_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:06.22 -14:14:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133829_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133829_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:18.22 -14:35:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133833_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133833_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:00.44 -07:42:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133834_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133834_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:38.43 -10:43:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133837_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133837_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:03.86 -14:48:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133845_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133845_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:00.54 -13:32:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133890_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133890_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:49.92 -06:59:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133943_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
Preparing report for the candidate 133943_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133988_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 133988_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:24.80 -11:01:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134013_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134013_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134052_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134052_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:32.33 -06:32:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134056_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134056_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:37.19 -12:47:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134159_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134159_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:57.45 -07:56:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134195_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134195_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:05.19 -13:01:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134262_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134262_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:26.15 -06:08:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134300_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134300_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:13.16 -09:47:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134369_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134369_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134378_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134378_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:07.49 -15:07:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134421_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134421_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134451_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134451_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:59.05 -04:52:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134453_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134453_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:59.27 -09:42:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134454_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134454_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134472_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134472_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:21.83 -05:17:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134474_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134474_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134499_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134499_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:10.96 -06:24:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134506_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134506_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:07.00 -13:31:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134529_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134529_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:24.90 -07:16:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134557_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134557_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:14.00 -06:08:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134593_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
Preparing report for the candidate 134593_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134613_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134613_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:24.93 -14:55:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134634_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134634_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:55.90 -09:58:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134654_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134654_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:40.92 -07:05:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134692_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134692_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:57.24 -10:22:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134712_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134712_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134724_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134724_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:44.16 -14:43:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134736_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134736_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:27.87 -12:05:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134745_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134745_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134759_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134759_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134773_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134773_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:55.90 -08:38:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134777_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
Preparing report for the candidate 134777_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134842_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134842_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134868_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134868_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:26.21 -05:36:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134882_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134882_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:44.26 -07:47:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134959_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134959_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134963_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 134963_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123371_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 123371_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:11.42 -10:00:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03139_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 03139_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:02.71 -05:12:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127598_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 127598_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:21.89 -05:43:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101252_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 101252_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:23.33 -12:47:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86607_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 86607_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:17.84 -12:14:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92698_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 92698_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:33.19 -13:53:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96174_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 96174_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:02.35 -13:23:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85396_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 85396_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:08.71 -13:31:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101829_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 101829_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:29.45 -12:40:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11684_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 11684_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:33.42 -06:24:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97384_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 97384_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:31.65 -13:16:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85096_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 85096_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:22.90 -13:42:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10036_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 10036_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:55:54.69 -06:11:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62799_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 62799_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:15.34 -14:22:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37213_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018
The candidate 37213_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018 did not pass the final checks