This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 28.3352 2461341.8352 8.47 07:34:44.24 +23:51:27.0
195.52357 19.71204 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 1 -1 1 8.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:44.24 +23:51:27.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:34:44.24 +23:51:27.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461341.8352,8.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261028.3352 8.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 28.3352 2461341.8352 13.11 07:07:21.01 +20:15:46.7
196.35647 12.46493 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.76 Freia 2 0 2 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:21.01 +20:15:46.7: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:21.01 +20:15:46.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461341.8352,13.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261028.3352 13.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 28.3352 2461341.8352 13.04 07:02:13.49 +20:20:24.1
195.77061 11.40590 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.179 Klytaemnestra 1 0 1 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:02:13.49 +20:20:24.1: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:02:13.49 +20:20:24.1: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461341.8352,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261028.3352 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461341.83559692 28.10.2026 08:03:05.574 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 21980
Objects passed selection criteria: 21856
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15372.5
Average stars matched: 15010.2 (97.6435 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246756 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 28 03:09:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461341.83559692 28.10.2026 08:03:05.574 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 118
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.11
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 139279
Objects passed selection criteria: 138826
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 100059
Average stars matched: 96351.5 (96.2947 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 605312 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 28 03:11:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461341.83476469
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:08.927 +22:01:29.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:08.927 +22:01:29.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0318 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:06.301 +22:00:50.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:06.301 +22:00:50.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0170 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:08.927 +22:01:29.65
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:06.301 +22:00:50.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01493 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tcAVRShvUc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8DguLmCOrv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pBm6LERNXs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O6C0nBjf9q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11759 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11759 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11759 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11759 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.9 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
2.9 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.tcAVRShvUc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=1, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4811 stars left (next iteration limit 5292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4811 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=904 n_q2=1356 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1492 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4811 N_valid=4811 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.007 median_sep_arcsec=0.274 p95_sep_arcsec=1.230 n_q1=904 n_q2=1356 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1492 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8DguLmCOrv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=1, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 21095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4806 stars left (next iteration limit 5285)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4806 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=895 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1061 n_q4=1499 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4806 N_valid=4806 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.311 p95_sep_arcsec=1.195 n_q1=895 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1061 n_q4=1499 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pBm6LERNXs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=498, bad_region=0, passed=7492
Got 7492 stars (including 6988 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7492 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4806 stars left (next iteration limit 5286)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4806 robust_rms=12.475 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.931 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.931 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4806 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.842 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.842 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4806 robust_rms=0.309 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.466 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.466 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4806 robust_rms_before=0.953 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.330 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.309 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.526 worst_region_rms_after=0.466 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.094 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.466
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.sip_refit.fulSvc/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.sip_refit.fulSvc/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:08.914 +22:01:28.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7492 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.sip_refit.fulSvc/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_3486905.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.sip_refit.fulSvc/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.josRnn' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_3486905.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.953 -> 0.309 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4806 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4629 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4629 pairs (4806 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4629 robust_rms=11.978 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.585 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.585 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4629 robust_rms=0.484 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.825 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.825 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4629 robust_rms=0.305 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.461 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.461 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4629 robust_rms_before=0.305 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.305 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.305 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.461 worst_region_rms_after=0.461 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.461 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.461
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.461 vs 0.461 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7491 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits N_match=4629 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=1406 n_q2=904 n_q3=1392 n_q4=927 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.206
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4629 N_valid=4629 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.254 p95_sep_arcsec=0.898 n_q1=1406 n_q2=904 n_q3=1392 n_q4=927 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.O6C0nBjf9q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=492, bad_region=0, passed=7359
Got 7359 stars (including 6860 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7359 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=12.500 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.871 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.871 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=0.462 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.985 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.985 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=0.308 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.485 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.485 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4803 robust_rms_before=0.952 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.334 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.308 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.545 worst_region_rms_after=0.485 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.067 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.485
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.sip_refit.6TRkHB/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.sip_refit.6TRkHB/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:06.292 +22:00:49.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7359 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.sip_refit.6TRkHB/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_3486916.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.sip_refit.6TRkHB/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.ftNIpd' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_3486916.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.952 -> 0.308 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4803 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4635 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4635 pairs (4803 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4635 robust_rms=11.929 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.852 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.852 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4635 robust_rms=0.460 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.926 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.926 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4635 robust_rms=0.303 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.473 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.473 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4635 robust_rms_before=0.304 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.304 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.303 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.473 worst_region_rms_after=0.473 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.473 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.473
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.473 vs 0.473 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4635 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4635 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits N_match=4635 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1419 n_q2=899 n_q3=1382 n_q4=935 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4635 N_valid=4635 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.255 p95_sep_arcsec=0.881 n_q1=1419 n_q2=899 n_q3=1382 n_q4=935 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.183
ref2=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.279
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits sigma_overall=0.306 worst_q_ratio=1.206
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits sigma_overall=0.318 worst_q_ratio=1.132
reference average sigma_overall=0.4065 worst_q_ratio=1.231
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4811 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4806 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428_astrometric_residuals.png (4629 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.21 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429_astrometric_residuals.png (4635 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:44.24 +23:51:27.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:32.40 +23:01:31.2: 11.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:50.62 +20:58:42.1: 10.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.38 +22:51:40.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:09.77 +22:47:45.3: 10.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.80 +22:54:43.1: 10.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:50.62 +20:58:42.1: 10.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.38 +22:51:40.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.38 +22:51:40.1: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.80 +22:54:43.1: 10.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:09.77 +22:47:45.3: 10.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:32.40 +23:01:31.2: 11.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:34:44.24 +23:51:27.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.74 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:09.77 +22:47:45.3: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.1520 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.80 +22:54:43.1: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.5846 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:50.62 +20:58:42.1: ref_mag=10.74 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9119 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:32.40 +23:01:31.2: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2998 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31360.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 30s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31360_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 31360_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31364_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 31364_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.06 +25:59:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31366_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 31366_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31393_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 31393_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31409_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 31409_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31426_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 31426_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31433_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 31433_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 31s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:34:44.24 +23:51:27.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:08.914 +22:01:28.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:08.914 +22:01:28.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0316 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:06.292 +22:00:49.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:06.292 +22:00:49.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0168 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:08.914 +22:01:28.95
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:06.292 +22:00:49.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01491 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K9j6UJVk4D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O3uMEqGwlD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vQ1i6fL0Xh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IDk7N3v2UG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.796750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.796750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.11
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 113 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.7 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.K9j6UJVk4D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, bad_region=3, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133484 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=951 n_q2=1322 n_q3=1097 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4804 N_valid=4804 bias_ra_arcsec=0.020 bias_dec_arcsec=0.013 median_sep_arcsec=0.269 p95_sep_arcsec=1.115 n_q1=951 n_q2=1322 n_q3=1097 n_q4=1434 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.O3uMEqGwlD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=67, blended=17785, bad_region=5, passed=153538
Got 153538 stars (including 135488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4802 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4802 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=940 n_q2=1322 n_q3=1093 n_q4=1447 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.266
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4802 N_valid=4802 bias_ra_arcsec=0.014 bias_dec_arcsec=0.013 median_sep_arcsec=0.299 p95_sep_arcsec=1.151 n_q1=940 n_q2=1322 n_q3=1093 n_q4=1447 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vQ1i6fL0Xh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=2, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2187, bad_region=6, passed=49252
Got 49252 stars (including 46982 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49252 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4807 stars left (next iteration limit 5286)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4807 robust_rms=12.156 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.771 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.771 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4807 robust_rms=0.495 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.839 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.839 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4807 robust_rms=0.304 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.461 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.461 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4807 robust_rms_before=0.306 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.316 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.304 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.464 worst_region_rms_after=0.461 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.464 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.461
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.464 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.464 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.306 arcsec matched=4807
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits N_match=4807 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.251 n_q1=1422 n_q2=919 n_q3=1482 n_q4=984 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4807 N_valid=4807 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.016 median_sep_arcsec=0.257 p95_sep_arcsec=1.337 n_q1=1422 n_q2=919 n_q3=1482 n_q4=984 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.IDk7N3v2UG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2156, bad_region=6, passed=48489
Got 48489 stars (including 46271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4807 stars left (next iteration limit 5286)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4807 robust_rms=12.145 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.934 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.934 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4807 robust_rms=0.479 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.953 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.953 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4807 robust_rms=0.306 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.472 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.472 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4807 robust_rms_before=0.306 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.321 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.306 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.476 worst_region_rms_after=0.472 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.476 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.472
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.476 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.476 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.306 arcsec matched=4807
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits N_match=4807 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1438 n_q2=908 n_q3=1483 n_q4=978 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4807 N_valid=4807 bias_ra_arcsec=0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.020 median_sep_arcsec=0.260 p95_sep_arcsec=1.303 n_q1=1438 n_q2=908 n_q3=1483 n_q4=978 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_030522_TTUQ1b1x1_3460897_wYD9Hqk2/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:47:19.96 +17:25:38.4: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:53:35.70 +17:26:40.9: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:46:55.22 +16:59:37.2: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:04.85 +19:49:25.8: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:47:43.05 +16:41:30.2: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:42:40.34 +16:54:42.4: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:49:23.04 +16:49:19.2: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:16.93 +20:35:58.5: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:47:47.71 +17:28:12.9: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:47:47.71 +17:28:12.9: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:47:43.05 +16:41:30.2: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:53:35.70 +17:26:40.9: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:46:55.22 +16:59:37.2: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:04.85 +19:49:25.8: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:47:19.96 +17:25:38.4: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:49:23.04 +16:49:19.2: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:16.93 +20:35:58.5: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:42:40.34 +16:54:42.4: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:47:43.05 +16:41:30.2: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8705 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:47:47.71 +17:28:12.9: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0147 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:53:35.70 +17:26:40.9: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8302 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:49:23.04 +16:49:19.2: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6389 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:47:19.96 +17:25:38.4: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9312 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:16.93 +20:35:58.5: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9395 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:04.85 +19:49:25.8: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0566 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:46:55.22 +16:59:37.2: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6403 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:42:40.34 +16:54:42.4: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8314 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:49:59.10 +16:56:07.9: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:49:23.13 +17:00:44.8: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:51:52.40 +17:34:12.6: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:52:09.33 +17:19:26.2: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:29.96 +27:10:49.1: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:51:13.82 +16:42:47.1: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:49:59.10 +16:56:07.9: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:49:59.10 +16:56:07.9: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5375 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.30 +19:41:48.7: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:02:02.59 +19:22:26.1: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:51:13.82 +16:42:47.1: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:29.96 +27:10:49.1: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:52:09.33 +17:19:26.2: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:51:52.40 +17:34:12.6: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:49:23.13 +17:00:44.8: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:51:13.82 +16:42:47.1: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4917 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:29.96 +27:10:49.1: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8351 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:52:09.33 +17:19:26.2: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4384 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:51:52.40 +17:34:12.6: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3895 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:49:23.13 +17:00:44.8: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3781 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:51:41.28 +16:57:29.7: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:48:37.87 +16:44:10.3: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:02:02.59 +19:22:26.1: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:01.30 +19:41:48.7: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:02.59 +19:22:26.1: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4410 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.30 +19:41:48.7: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5615 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:51:41.28 +16:57:29.7: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:51:41.28 +16:57:29.7: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2151 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:50:43.91 +16:44:38.9: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:48:37.87 +16:44:10.3: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:48:37.87 +16:44:10.3: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2312 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:53:31.28 +16:32:55.7: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:53:38.16 +16:51:18.3: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:49:53.12 +16:39:29.0: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:50:43.91 +16:44:38.9: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:50:43.91 +16:44:38.9: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2475 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:53:31.28 +16:32:55.7: 11.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:53:38.16 +16:51:18.3: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:49:53.12 +16:39:29.0: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:53:31.28 +16:32:55.7: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7514 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:53:38.16 +16:51:18.3: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1302 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:49:53.12 +16:39:29.0: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8963 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:54:19.23 +16:37:01.6: 10.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:55:11.68 +23:55:10.1: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:50:51.23 +16:42:35.8: 10.60 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:52:18.62 +16:39:36.3: 9.88 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:54:19.23 +16:37:01.6: 11.00 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.99 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:54:19.23 +16:37:01.6: ref_mag=10.99 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4337 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:55:11.68 +23:55:10.1: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:50:51.23 +16:42:35.8: 10.63 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.61 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:11.68 +23:55:10.1: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7971 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:50:51.23 +16:42:35.8: ref_mag=10.61 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6521 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:52:18.62 +16:39:36.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:52:18.62 +16:39:36.3: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.6: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:57.55 +22:31:30.5: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:58.04 +25:16:52.7: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:27.13 +26:25:33.6: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:01.21 +26:51:14.2: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.85 +22:50:51.2: 10.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:57:57.55 +22:31:30.5: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:57.55 +22:31:30.5: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4291 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:58.04 +25:16:52.7: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:58.04 +25:16:52.7: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5173 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:27.13 +26:25:33.6: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:27.13 +26:25:33.6: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4822 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:34.98 +19:24:25.7: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:36:01.21 +26:51:14.2: 12.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:36:01.21 +26:51:14.2: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5743 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.85 +22:50:51.2: 10.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.72 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.85 +22:50:51.2: ref_mag=10.72 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.5674 delta=-1.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:54:54.00 +18:05:36.6: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:34.98 +19:24:25.7: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:34.98 +19:24:25.7: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4685 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:54:54.00 +18:05:36.6: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:54:54.00 +18:05:36.6: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4435 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:41.66 +24:40:37.3: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:03:30.62 +25:21:00.3: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:21.01 +20:15:46.7: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:20.39 +24:26:16.3: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:03:22.76 +23:10:38.1: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:28:41.66 +24:40:37.3: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:41.66 +24:40:37.3: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9674 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:03:30.62 +25:21:00.3: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:30.62 +25:21:00.3: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0714 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:02:13.49 +20:20:24.1: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:20.39 +24:26:16.3: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:21.01 +20:15:46.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:03:22.76 +23:10:38.1: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:20.39 +24:26:16.3: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2358 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:22.76 +23:10:38.1: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1710 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:01:37.27 +21:43:08.8: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:02:13.49 +20:20:24.1: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:26:55.39 +21:31:09.2: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:01:37.27 +21:43:08.8: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:37.27 +21:43:08.8: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3602 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:26:55.39 +21:31:09.2: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:55.39 +21:31:09.2: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2330 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out175998.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176037.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 32s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175442_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175442_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:30.82 +22:51:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175447_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175447_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175450_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175450_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175451_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175451_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175452_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175452_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175457_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175457_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175471_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175471_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:31.08 +20:09:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.17 +19:40:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175490_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175490_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175492_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175492_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175493_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175493_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:12.76 +21:35:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.81 +20:04:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.51 +21:02:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175503_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175503_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:18.79 +24:28:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:32.90 +24:41:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175511_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175511_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175512_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175512_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175514_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175514_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:01.24 +25:15:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175516_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175516_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175517_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175517_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175519_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175519_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:11.63 +22:11:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175520_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175520_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175521_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175521_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:19.29 +22:46:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175522_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175522_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175525_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175525_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175529_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175529_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:44.57 +25:12:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175530_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175530_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:23.30 +22:16:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:27.78 +19:32:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175534_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175534_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:33.37 +20:56:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175535_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175535_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175536_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175536_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175540_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175540_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175545_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175545_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:44.23 +23:51:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175622_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175622_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.91 +22:56:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175640_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175640_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.57 +22:51:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175676_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175676_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175680_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175680_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:49.29 +19:28:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175684_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175684_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.69 +19:12:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175688_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175688_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.23 +24:07:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175692_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175692_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.53 +22:52:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175693_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175693_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.78 +25:46:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175733_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175733_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.18 +22:38:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175739_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175739_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.38 +22:56:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175769_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175769_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175771_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175771_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175772_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175772_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175782_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175782_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:52.16 +26:07:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175785_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175785_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.90 +23:02:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175796_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175796_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175801_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175801_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.47 +22:23:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175811_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175811_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.46 +26:03:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175814_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175814_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175820_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175820_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.33 +25:56:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175828_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175828_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175850_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175850_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:48.21 +24:16:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175856_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175856_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:19.04 +25:55:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175859_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175859_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:18.07 +24:27:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175876_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175876_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175887_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175887_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.20 +22:10:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175891_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175891_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:20.46 +26:22:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175900_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175900_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.14 +18:03:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175902_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175902_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:48.74 +20:26:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175904_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175904_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:22.85 +25:23:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175909_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175909_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.75 +23:56:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175914_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175914_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:53.90 +20:58:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175926_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175926_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.32 +21:47:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175927_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175927_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.09 +23:37:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175928_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175928_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175934_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175934_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.44 +21:18:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175944_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175944_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.85 +22:42:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175949_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175949_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.95 +25:33:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175959_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175959_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175978_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175978_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:49.70 +25:29:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175984_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175984_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.15 +22:57:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175987_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175987_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:39.40 +26:48:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175991_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175991_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.27 +24:32:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175998_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 175998_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175999_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 175999_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176000_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176000_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176007_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176007_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.08 +22:43:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176012_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176012_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.45 +24:54:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176020_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176020_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.78 +22:49:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176022_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176022_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.59 +26:19:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176029_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176029_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.45 +20:30:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176037_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 176037_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176039_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176039_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:45.79 +23:15:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176040_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176040_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:11.14 +24:39:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176044_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176044_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.14 +22:52:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176049_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176049_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176050_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176050_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.77 +18:51:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176053_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176053_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.37 +20:05:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176058_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176058_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:26.09 +22:50:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176062_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176062_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.14 +22:57:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176085_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176085_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:29.33 +22:51:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176090_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176090_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:21.79 +23:05:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176093_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176093_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:17.06 +22:39:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176096_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 176096_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.16 +22:51:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05356_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 05356_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:32.76 +26:47:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.06 +25:59:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163919_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 163919_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.38 +24:13:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106224_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 106224_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:11.59 +19:32:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_03-03-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks