######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=esa_tap (lib/gaia_dr2_cone_search.sh -> ESA Gaia Archive TAP service)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cet-10-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-10-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-10-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 325816 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 325816 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits_preview.png'
Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits

renamed 'Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits_preview.png'
Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1164.6233
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 463.0200
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4052.4585
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 837.9216
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4077.0500
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 842.4856
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.47963
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.005
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 15.710000038147 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 15.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-27T23:13:54.8665200' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-28T04:13:54.8665200' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61341.1763294674 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-28T04:14:04.7661605' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61341.1764440509 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 13.3306779187828 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -17.9998249598307 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 36.3155555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 161.556666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.68554269193665 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 53 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20708 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20708 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.710000038147 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.710000038147 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 90.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/d_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits :)
Spent 0.562534 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/d_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 15.7299995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 15.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-27T23:14:37.5861206' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-28T04:14:37.5861206' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61341.1768239122 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-28T04:14:47.4890818' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61341.1769385301 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 13.33067790864 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -17.999824946271 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 36.3613888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 161.755277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.6837205656614 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 53 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20708 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20708 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.7299995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.7299995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 90.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/d_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits :)
Spent 0.559740 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/d_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits

fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461341.67644521
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:20.548 -17:59:43.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64
Second-epoch image center 00:53:20.548 -17:59:43.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0164 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:21.298 -18:00:04.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64
Second-epoch image center 00:53:21.298 -18:00:04.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0135 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:53:20.548 -17:59:43.94
Second-epoch second image center 00:53:21.298 -18:00:04.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00636 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XRlJ7S3odv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nZVddUO0yG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I6Kqo6Pq75
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KiJzvNEn3x
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg
Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.879650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.879650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg
Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg
Loaded 4161 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2348 out of 2396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2396 out of 4144 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
2.1 pix Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
15.1 mag. Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.XRlJ7S3odv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=318, bad_region=1038, passed=4470
Got 4470 stars (including 3173 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3120 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3118 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3645 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3120 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3645 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3645 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 3118 stars left (next iteration limit 3429)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=3118 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.236 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=970 n_q2=588 n_q3=960 n_q4=600 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3118 N_valid=3118 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.234 p95_sep_arcsec=0.698 n_q1=970 n_q2=588 n_q3=960 n_q4=600 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nZVddUO0yG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=259, bad_region=948, passed=4144
Got 4144 stars (including 2986 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 2935 stars left (next iteration limit 3225)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=2935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=910 n_q2=554 n_q3=908 n_q4=563 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2935 N_valid=2935 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.100 bias_dec_arcsec=0.768 median_sep_arcsec=2.964 p95_sep_arcsec=6.851 n_q1=910 n_q2=554 n_q3=908 n_q4=563 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.I6Kqo6Pq75 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=181, bad_region=477, passed=2098
Got 2098 stars (including 1496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2098 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1462 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1460 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1459 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1460 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1462 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1460 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1460 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 1460 stars left (next iteration limit 1606)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1460 robust_rms=7.504 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.610 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.610 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1460 robust_rms=0.693 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.912 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.912 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1460 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.453 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.453 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1460 robust_rms_before=0.985 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.311 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.360 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.463 worst_region_rms_after=0.453 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.546 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.453
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.463 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.463 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.311 arcsec matched=1460
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits N_match=1460 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=447 n_q2=248 n_q3=499 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=1460 N_valid=1460 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.324 bias_dec_arcsec=0.417 median_sep_arcsec=0.895 p95_sep_arcsec=1.965 n_q1=447 n_q2=248 n_q3=499 n_q4=266 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KiJzvNEn3x (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=196, bad_region=471, passed=2067
Got 2067 stars (including 1464 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2067 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1431 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1429 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1429 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1431 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1429 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1429 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 1429 stars left (next iteration limit 1571)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1429 robust_rms=7.653 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.115 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.115 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1429 robust_rms=0.661 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.997 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.997 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1429 robust_rms=0.388 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.450 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.450 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1429 robust_rms_before=0.945 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.372 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.388 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.523 worst_region_rms_after=0.450 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.503 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.450
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.sip_refit.an6iEa/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.sip_refit.an6iEa/candidate.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:21.283 -18:00:04.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 2067 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.sip_refit.an6iEa/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_133661.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.sip_refit.an6iEa/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.L0NNLO' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_133661.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.945 -> 0.388 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 1429 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1340 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 1340 pairs (1429 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1340 robust_rms=7.697 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.075 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.075 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1340 robust_rms=0.668 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.910 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.910 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1340 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.444 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.427 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1340 robust_rms_before=0.392 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.392 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.449 worst_region_rms_after=0.444 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.449 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.427
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.sip_refit.SFxYQX/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.sip_refit.SFxYQX/candidate.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:21.283 -18:00:04.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 2067 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.sip_refit.SFxYQX/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_134117.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.sip_refit.SFxYQX/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.xFIaCc' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_134117.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.392 -> 0.393 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1340 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1340 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
SIP_REFIT: the refit moved 23 of 2067 stars by more than 1.00 arcsec (at most 1.93 arcsec) - the pairs no longer describe the solution, matching the catalog again
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 2, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 1340 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1340 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 1340 pairs (1340 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1340 robust_rms=7.697 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.075 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.075 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1340 robust_rms=0.668 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.910 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.910 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1340 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.444 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.427 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1340 robust_rms_before=0.393 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.389 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.444 worst_region_rms_after=0.444 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.427 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.427
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.444 vs 0.444 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1340 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1340 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits N_match=1340 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.401 n_q1=403 n_q2=222 n_q3=463 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=1340 N_valid=1340 bias_ra_arcsec=0.009 bias_dec_arcsec=0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.313 p95_sep_arcsec=0.925 n_q1=403 n_q2=222 n_q3=463 n_q4=252 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits sigma_overall=0.280 worst_q_ratio=1.228
ref2=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.141
new1=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new2=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits sigma_overall=0.396 worst_q_ratio=1.134
reference average sigma_overall=0.2775 worst_q_ratio=1.1845
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017_astrometric_residuals.png (3118 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067_astrometric_residuals.png (2935 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218_astrometric_residuals.png (1460 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219_astrometric_residuals.png (1340 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:05:47.37 -18:53:10.3: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:05:47.37 -18:53:10.3: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20131.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 30s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20131_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 20131_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 31s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
01:05:47.37 -18:53:10.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:20.548 -17:59:43.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64
Second-epoch image center 00:53:20.548 -17:59:43.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0164 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:21.283 -18:00:04.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64
Second-epoch image center 00:53:21.283 -18:00:04.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0134 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:53:20.548 -17:59:43.94
Second-epoch second image center 00:53:21.283 -18:00:04.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00645 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QPfT2zV1a3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b9StDPgN6M
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5mr8R1Uuu3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XSGojbyeEp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg
Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.766400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.766400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg
Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 21682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg
Loaded 4192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2550 out of 2661 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2661 out of 21682 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 20 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
2.0 pix Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
15.2 mag. Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.QPfT2zV1a3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=893, bad_region=4833, passed=24282
Got 24282 stars (including 18732 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24282 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1559 n_q2=934 n_q3=1493 n_q4=894 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4880 N_valid=4880 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.250 p95_sep_arcsec=0.666 n_q1=1559 n_q2=934 n_q3=1493 n_q4=894 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.b9StDPgN6M (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=669, bad_region=3901, passed=21676
Got 21676 stars (including 17202 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21676 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4868 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=4868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=1587 n_q2=945 n_q3=1469 n_q4=867 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4868 N_valid=4868 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.091 bias_dec_arcsec=0.930 median_sep_arcsec=2.866 p95_sep_arcsec=6.758 n_q1=1587 n_q2=945 n_q3=1469 n_q4=867 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5mr8R1Uuu3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=368, bad_region=2640, passed=12954
Got 12954 stars (including 10033 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12954 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5332)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=7.403 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.086 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.086 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=0.762 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.131 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.131 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=0.498 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.659 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.659 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4851 robust_rms_before=1.058 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.472 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.498 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.659 worst_region_rms_after=0.659 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.574 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.659
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.659 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.659 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.472 arcsec matched=4851
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.398 n_q1=1538 n_q2=900 n_q3=1499 n_q4=914 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4851 N_valid=4851 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.339 bias_dec_arcsec=0.436 median_sep_arcsec=0.955 p95_sep_arcsec=2.000 n_q1=1538 n_q2=900 n_q3=1499 n_q4=914 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XSGojbyeEp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=364, bad_region=2648, passed=12987
Got 12987 stars (including 10062 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12987 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4847 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4847 stars left (next iteration limit 5331)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4847 robust_rms=7.517 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.868 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.868 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4847 robust_rms=0.738 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.159 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.159 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4847 robust_rms=0.516 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.648 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.638 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4847 robust_rms_before=0.517 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.490 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.516 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.628 worst_region_rms_after=0.648 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.641 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.638
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.628 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.628 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.490 arcsec matched=4847
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits N_match=4847 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.425 n_q1=1544 n_q2=900 n_q3=1487 n_q4=916 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4847 N_valid=4847 bias_ra_arcsec=0.033 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.413 p95_sep_arcsec=1.274 n_q1=1544 n_q2=900 n_q3=1487 n_q4=916 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:09:42.94 -20:44:52.1: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:00:30.09 -19:24:27.7: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:46:57.67 -20:19:17.6: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:00:30.09 -19:24:27.7: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:46:57.67 -20:19:17.6: 13.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:09:42.94 -20:44:52.1: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:00:30.09 -19:24:27.7: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3881 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:46:57.67 -20:19:17.6: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6119 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:09:42.94 -20:44:52.1: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6850 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30734_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 30734_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.17645 | 2461341.67645 | 13.66 | 01:09:42.95 -20:44:51.7 | 7100 1489 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 13.72 | 01:09:42.92 -20:44:52.5 | 7098 1492 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30735_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 30735_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.17645 | 2461341.67645 | 13.54 | 00:46:57.66 -20:19:17.4 | 3876 1790 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 13.70 | 00:46:57.69 -20:19:17.8 | 3875 1793 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30771_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 30771_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 8.74 | 01:05:47.36 -18:53:10.2 | 6565 2635 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
**** FOUND 01:05:47.36 -18:53:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30947_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 30947_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 10.67 | 01:11:10.68 -20:01:31.4 | 7319 1924 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31014_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 31014_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 10.82 | 00:46:59.55 -17:56:12.3 | 3875 3235 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31356_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 31356_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 11.71 | 00:34:35.87 -16:08:27.6 | 2065 4304 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31867_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 31867_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 12.39 | 00:39:35.34 -14:02:35.6 | 2777 5588 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32290_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 32290_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 13.17 | 01:07:58.88 -14:21:12.9 | 6950 5374 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32358_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 32358_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 13.07 | 00:43:11.29 -18:26:52.4 | 3330 2923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32526_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 32526_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.17645 | 2461341.67645 | 13.34 | 01:00:30.07 -19:24:27.7 | 5804 2331 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0218.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 13.45 | 01:00:30.10 -19:24:27.6 | 5803 2335 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32561_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 32561_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 13.37 | 00:48:47.86 -13:55:38.8 | 4133 5663 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32759_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 32759_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 13.53 | 00:34:30.53 -16:03:59.5 | 2051 4349 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32857_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 32857_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 13.64 | 00:44:54.09 -21:53:13.6 | 3587 0841 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32900_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 32900_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 13.71 | 01:08:41.15 -21:35:45.7 | 6939 0981 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33034_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 33034_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 13.96 | 01:09:08.02 -21:17:07.7 | 7007 1168 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33064_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 33064_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 13.89 | 00:48:35.33 -18:51:23.9 | 4105 2680 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33082_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 33082_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 13.92 | 01:08:21.27 -18:21:51.0 | 6941 2942 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33096_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 33096_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 13.59 | 00:47:59.40 -19:38:37.5 | 4020 2204 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33105_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 33105_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 13.88 | 00:35:40.63 -17:29:20.7 | 2238 3489 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33110_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 33110_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.17694 | 2461341.67694 | 13.62 | 00:51:02.97 -14:02:27.4 | 4464 5593 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_232107_TTUQ2b1x1_47651_damTeqIh/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-10-27_23-14-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
01:05:47.37 -18:53:10.3
########### Completed Cet-10-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
01:05:47.37 -18:53:10.3
###################################################################################
01:05:47.37 -18:53:10.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461341.67644521 -observatory V36
15:05:28.07 -19:59:52.9 Mercury (1.2mag)
13:35:16.69 -16:05:48.2 Venus (-4.3mag)
09:16:55.15 +17:24:01.9 Mars (0.9mag)
09:44:05.44 +14:20:07.3 Jupiter (-2.0mag)
00:37:53.59 +01:09:08.9 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:09:58.33 +20:52:34.0 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:08:49.25 -00:35:16.1 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:17.37 -23:42:25.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
03:56:46.54 +25:03:54.8 Moon (-12.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 27 23:26 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461341.67644521:
09:44:11.91 +14:19:31.0 Io (6.0mag)
09:43:59.07 +14:20:42.8 Europa (6.1mag)
09:44:05.82 +14:20:06.0 Ganymede (5.5mag)
09:43:40.15 +14:22:29.1 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:45:05.62 +14:33:28.2 Himalia (15.5mag)
09:44:02.85 +14:20:21.7 Thebe (16.4mag)
09:43:30.55 +14:44:39.0 Elara (17.4mag)
09:45:20.83 +13:45:45.5 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
09:41:31.61 +14:50:57.0 Carme (18.7mag)
00:37:39.44 +01:09:14.6 Titan (8.2mag)
00:37:55.00 +01:08:50.9 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:38:10.19 +01:08:28.0 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:37:47.30 +01:09:28.1 Hyperion (14.2mag)
00:36:07.38 +00:56:48.6 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 27 23:26 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461341.67644521:
04:14:55.63 +18:50:17.8 JWST
18:40:29.61 +12:48:09.6 Chandra
06:01:59.90 +27:50:52.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 27 23:26 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461341.67644521 -observatory V36
03:38:02.03 +20:04:35.6 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
07:44:22.48 +37:57:03.7 17.9mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill)
07:44:27.62 +37:56:50.9 17.9mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill)
07:43:47.41 +37:57:07.1 17.9mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill)
05:02:50.52 +40:05:32.0 17.8mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski)
18:41:14.38 -33:03:40.6 14.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:44:37.02 -73:30:20.4 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:13:01.14 +35:08:06.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:28:36.24 +47:37:35.5 17.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:34:54.95 +25:20:54.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:07:41.16 +37:40:08.5 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:33:13.54 +40:57:55.8 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:44:47.76 -13:38:39.5 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:49:33.12 +14:38:45.0 15.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
14:08:29.70 -04:05:48.0 16.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
19:50:47.93 +56:57:44.3 15.4mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
13:01:42.71 +16:09:17.6 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:14:20.74 -60:21:15.7 14.0mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
19:28:09.57 -05:15:24.1 16.8mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS)
23:44:03.51 +15:38:37.2 17.0mag 2P/Encke
23:18:07.86 -27:30:29.4 15.2mag 10P/Tempel
02:32:36.49 +33:37:05.1 16.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:22:14.30 -09:31:54.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:13:09.86 -09:05:26.7 15.8mag 65P/Gunn
07:54:53.70 +14:13:22.3 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
02:41:33.73 +13:24:39.8 18.0mag 88P/Howell
08:38:52.32 +44:33:40.1 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
09:39:04.47 +07:57:28.4 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
12:14:45.02 +09:26:24.9 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
20:06:10.27 +12:33:36.8 10.0mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:58:43.65 -01:57:12.2 15.7mag 169P/NEAT
03:16:35.30 +02:42:09.4 15.1mag 220P/McNaught
06:20:51.88 +48:38:45.3 15.6mag 260P/McNaught
07:49:41.35 +25:12:06.7 17.6mag 266P/Christensen
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct 27 23:26 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92
10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27
21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82
01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9
01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88
00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77
22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42
01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3
18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23
21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83
03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75
04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52
09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93
02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.89 -10:37:05.90 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.05 15.79
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 27 23:26 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag
01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag
17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag
09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag
00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag
04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag
05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag
05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 27 23:26 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
10:32:09.821 +11:37:46.17 AT 2026aetj 2026-10-01.53 18.5059
16:11:43.883 +20:59:33.48 AT 2026aeti 2026-10-03.14 19.2268
19:55:55.462 +58:10:08.22 AT 2026aeth 2026-10-02.16 20.7283
14:55:19.146 +37:33:21.65 AT 2026aetg 2026-10-02.14 17.2445
14:51:59.504 +47:04:29.76 AT 2026aetf 2026-10-02.14 19.1738
06:50:36.388 +58:36:08.80 SN 2026aete 2026-10-07.53 19.306
09:20:29.340 +55:06:35.79 SN 2026aetd 2026-10-07.54 17.677
08:26:28.724 +38:08:57.54 AT 2026aetc 2026-10-02.47 19.3657
06:41:51.189 +21:53:58.11 SN 2026aetb 2026-10-07.46 19.5374
08:34:43.981 +46:14:33.95 AT 2026aeta 2026-10-02.51 19.5454
09:00:29.362 -03:20:55.67 AT 2026aesz 2026-10-03.53 19.6849
08:06:22.231 +46:59:03.50 AT 2026aesy 2026-10-01.51 19.6229
07:51:57.166 +45:05:58.19 AT 2026aesx 2026-10-01.41 19.6203
08:06:59.965 +46:08:20.08 AT 2026aesw 2026-10-01.41 19.7007
09:54:13.819 +04:50:26.21 AT 2026aesv 2026-10-01.53 19.1617
10:03:36.908 -05:05:53.11 AT 2026aesu 2026-10-01.53 17.8861
10:00:58.300 +04:55:31.23 AT 2026aest 2026-10-07.53 19.3128
04:23:19.588 -47:59:25.70 AT 2026aess 2026-02-23.11 23.4645
08:59:18.240 +10:57:46.23 AT 2026aesr 2026-10-05.52 19.89
19:23:47.930 -12:36:03.40 AT 2026aesq 2026-10-06.12 18.38
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 27 23:26 tns_transients_list.txt