This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 24.1764 2461337.6764 12.95 04:30:03.60 +26:17:00.4
172.16258 -15.05267 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata -1 0 1 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:30:03.60 +26:17:00.4: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:30:03.60 +26:17:00.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 24.1764* 04 30 03.60 +26 17 00.4 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461337.6764,12.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261024.1764 12.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 24.1764 2461337.6764 13.12 04:35:24.24 +29:41:06.7
170.32775 -11.92529 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana -0 -0 0 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:35:24.24 +29:41:06.7: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:35:24.24 +29:41:06.7: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 24.1764* 04 35 24.24 +29 41 06.7 13.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461337.6764,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261024.1764 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 24.1764 2461337.6764 13.52 04:29:38.87 +25:59:29.9
172.32667 -15.31465 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia 0 -1 1 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:29:38.87 +25:59:29.9: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:29:38.87 +25:59:29.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 24.1764* 04 29 38.87 +25 59 29.9 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461337.6764,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261024.1764 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 24.1764 2461337.6764 13.45 05:12:46.01 +31:02:51.4
174.30754 -4.76419 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.359 Georgia 1 -0 1 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:12:46.01 +31:02:51.4: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:12:46.01 +31:02:51.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461337.6764,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261024.1764 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 24.1764 2461337.6764 11.73 05:07:25.95 +26:11:38.6
177.57509 -8.55848 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -0 -1 1 12.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:25.95 +26:11:38.6: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:25.95 +26:11:38.6: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 24.1764* 05 07 25.95 +26 11 38.6 11.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461337.6764,11.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261024.1764 11.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461337.67670404 24.10.2026 04:14:17.229 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15159
Objects passed selection criteria: 15059
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10380
Average stars matched: 10089.2 (97.1989 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240832 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 23 23:19:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461337.67670404 24.10.2026 04:14:17.229 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 74
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 116503
Objects passed selection criteria: 116260
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 84254.5
Average stars matched: 81093.5 (96.2483 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 578524 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 23 23:20:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461337.67601463
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
Image size: 942.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:20.059 +29:59:38.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:20.059 +29:59:38.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0686 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:19.317 +29:58:58.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:19.317 +29:58:58.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0670 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:20.059 +29:59:38.49
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:19.317 +29:58:58.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01149 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.caESlNTpEy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eQlW0ixrEL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jDnEaQaDe0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits &> /tmp/tmp.es0kY6hojd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg
Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.caESlNTpEy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=0, passed=16295
Got 16295 stars (including 14768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4801 N_valid=4801 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.256 p95_sep_arcsec=1.309 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.eQlW0ixrEL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=0, passed=16349
Got 16349 stars (including 14839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4800 N_valid=4800 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.258 p95_sep_arcsec=1.293 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jDnEaQaDe0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=312, bad_region=0, passed=4545
Got 4545 stars (including 4224 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4545 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4086 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4044 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4044 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4084 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4046 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4046 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4046 stars left (next iteration limit 4448)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4046 robust_rms=12.103 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.240 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.240 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4046 robust_rms=0.566 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.798 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.798 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4046 robust_rms=0.315 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.434 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.434 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4046 robust_rms_before=1.045 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.347 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.315 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.487 worst_region_rms_after=0.434 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.041 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.434
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.sip_refit.kXXFLb/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.sip_refit.kXXFLb/candidate.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:20.086 +29:59:37.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 4545 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.sip_refit.kXXFLb/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_3053977.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.sip_refit.kXXFLb/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.5wDCgR' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_3053977.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.045 -> 0.315 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4046 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 3888 pairs (4046 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3888 robust_rms=11.982 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.821 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.821 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3888 robust_rms=0.563 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.778 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.778 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3888 robust_rms=0.310 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.426 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.426 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3888 robust_rms_before=0.310 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.310 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.310 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.429 worst_region_rms_after=0.426 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.429 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.426
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.sip_refit.h5Wd1v/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.sip_refit.h5Wd1v/candidate.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:20.087 +29:59:37.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 4545 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.sip_refit.h5Wd1v/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_3057182.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.sip_refit.h5Wd1v/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.bsnXsQ' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_3057182.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.310 -> 0.310 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits N_match=3888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=535 n_q2=817 n_q3=829 n_q4=1707 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3888 N_valid=3888 bias_ra_arcsec=0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.262 p95_sep_arcsec=0.925 n_q1=535 n_q2=817 n_q3=829 n_q4=1707 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.es0kY6hojd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=314, bad_region=0, passed=4607
Got 4607 stars (including 4288 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4607 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4143 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4101 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4101 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4606 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4143 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4104 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4606 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4104 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4606 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4104 stars left (next iteration limit 4511)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4104 robust_rms=12.052 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.527 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.527 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4104 robust_rms=0.568 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.787 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.787 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4104 robust_rms=0.324 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.461 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.461 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4104 robust_rms_before=1.037 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.324 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.519 worst_region_rms_after=0.461 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.056 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.461
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.sip_refit.UNEUHS/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.sip_refit.UNEUHS/candidate.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:19.344 +29:58:57.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 4607 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.sip_refit.UNEUHS/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_3053989.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.sip_refit.UNEUHS/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.2GPLts' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_3053989.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.037 -> 0.324 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4104 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 3930 pairs (4104 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3930 robust_rms=11.981 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.140 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.140 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3930 robust_rms=0.567 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.772 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.772 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3930 robust_rms=0.322 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.453 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.453 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3930 robust_rms_before=0.322 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.322 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.322 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.453 worst_region_rms_after=0.453 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.453 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.453
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.sip_refit.TvY7AB/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.sip_refit.TvY7AB/candidate.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:19.345 +29:58:57.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 4607 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.sip_refit.TvY7AB/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_3057171.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.sip_refit.TvY7AB/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.4rcPFe' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_3057171.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.322 -> 0.322 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4606 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4606 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits N_match=3930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=547 n_q2=826 n_q3=831 n_q4=1726 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3930 N_valid=3930 bias_ra_arcsec=0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.000 median_sep_arcsec=0.273 p95_sep_arcsec=0.889 n_q1=547 n_q2=826 n_q3=831 n_q4=1726 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.114
ref2=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new1=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.336 worst_q_ratio=1.096
new2=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.102
reference average sigma_overall=0.37 worst_q_ratio=1.1215
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4801 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (3888 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065_astrometric_residuals.png (3930 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.40 +34:08:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.60 +30:42:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:20.087 +29:59:37.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:20.087 +29:59:37.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0687 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:19.345 +29:58:57.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:19.345 +29:58:57.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0671 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:20.087 +29:59:37.55
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:19.345 +29:58:57.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01149 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jRgJfIfv6T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sqNrcgiVpk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xhadjloSsN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xGYffdZ4xt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6871 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6871 out of 129003 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6871 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6871 out of 129003 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.2955 deg
Loaded 8479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4936 out of 6879 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6879 out of 129055 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 68 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.8 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jRgJfIfv6T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=9, passed=128967
Got 128967 stars (including 114713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4788 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4788 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1870 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1152 n_q4=731 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4788 N_valid=4788 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.007 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.245 p95_sep_arcsec=1.190 n_q1=1870 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1152 n_q4=731 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.sqNrcgiVpk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=12, passed=129020
Got 129020 stars (including 114961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1874 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1148 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4791 N_valid=4791 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.253 p95_sep_arcsec=1.164 n_q1=1874 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1148 n_q4=723 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xhadjloSsN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1378, bad_region=4, passed=40497
Got 40497 stars (including 39043 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40497 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4791 robust_rms=12.093 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.171 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.171 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4791 robust_rms=0.568 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.814 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.814 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4791 robust_rms=0.318 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.450 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.450 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4791 robust_rms_before=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.348 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.318 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.442 worst_region_rms_after=0.450 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.442 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.450
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.442 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.442 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.320 arcsec matched=4791
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=728 n_q2=997 n_q3=1028 n_q4=2038 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4791 N_valid=4791 bias_ra_arcsec=0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.019 median_sep_arcsec=0.275 p95_sep_arcsec=1.379 n_q1=728 n_q2=997 n_q3=1028 n_q4=2038 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xGYffdZ4xt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1376, bad_region=6, passed=40787
Got 40787 stars (including 39336 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40787 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4791 robust_rms=12.049 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.464 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.464 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4791 robust_rms=0.559 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.824 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.824 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4791 robust_rms=0.328 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.466 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.466 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4791 robust_rms_before=0.330 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.362 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.328 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.461 worst_region_rms_after=0.466 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.461 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.466
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.461 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.461 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.330 arcsec matched=4791
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=718 n_q2=1007 n_q3=1024 n_q4=2042 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4791 N_valid=4791 bias_ra_arcsec=0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.016 median_sep_arcsec=0.278 p95_sep_arcsec=1.402 n_q1=718 n_q2=1007 n_q3=1024 n_q4=2042 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-13-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231645_TTUQ1b1x1_3034025_QVnARpwp/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:16.24 +32:38:12.9: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:55:45.17 +30:20:42.0: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:16.24 +32:38:12.9: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:16.24 +32:38:12.9: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2888 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:30:03.60 +26:17:00.4: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:55:45.17 +30:20:42.0: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:45.17 +30:20:42.0: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2006 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:10:01.85 +26:45:55.6: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:35:24.24 +29:41:06.7: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:09:49.71 +29:48:28.3: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:30:03.60 +26:17:00.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:01:54.57 +28:18:16.8: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:10:01.85 +26:45:55.6: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:35:24.24 +29:41:06.7: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:01.85 +26:45:55.6: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7805 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:09:49.71 +29:48:28.3: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:20:06.60 +32:46:11.9: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:49.71 +29:48:28.3: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1518 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:29:38.87 +25:59:29.9: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:01:47.93 +32:14:39.9: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:01:54.57 +28:18:16.8: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:54.57 +28:18:16.8: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1932 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:20:06.60 +32:46:11.9: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:06.60 +32:46:11.9: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1501 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:29:38.87 +25:59:29.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:01:47.93 +32:14:39.9: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:47.93 +32:14:39.9: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4480 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:11.35 +29:14:17.5: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:12:46.01 +31:02:51.4: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:11.35 +29:14:17.5: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:12:46.01 +31:02:51.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:11.35 +29:14:17.5: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4426 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:25.95 +26:11:38.6: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:25.95 +26:11:38.6: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:07:25.95 +26:11:38.6: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.7346 delta=2.08 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out100144.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151325.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151378.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151439.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151484.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:44.40 +25:22:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151105_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151105_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:38.47 +31:17:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151111_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151111_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151116_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151116_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:47.16 +28:37:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151118_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151118_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:16.67 +27:54:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:57.01 +33:47:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151120_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151120_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:06.76 +32:35:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151122_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151122_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:04.13 +30:27:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151123_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151123_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:18.13 +31:47:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151125_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151125_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:37.50 +26:55:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151126_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151126_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:31.67 +31:29:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151127_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151127_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:31.25 +27:01:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151128_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151128_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.01 +26:11:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151199_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151199_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.78 +34:09:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151206_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151206_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:57.81 +33:05:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151211_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151211_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:14.16 +28:37:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151216_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151216_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.53 +34:26:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151219_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151219_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.05 +34:07:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151233_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151233_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:18.14 +33:47:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151234_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151234_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.29 +34:07:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151236_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151236_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151256_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151256_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:56.87 +33:06:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151261_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151261_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:29.76 +32:42:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151266_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151266_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:25.50 +34:49:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151274_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151274_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.18 +28:37:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151275_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151275_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.60 +34:23:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151295_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151295_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:18.63 +34:10:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151299_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151299_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:46.56 +31:23:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151305_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151305_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.99 +28:31:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151312_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151312_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:25.06 +30:30:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151314_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151314_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.88 +26:55:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:11.46 +29:32:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151323_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151323_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:36.02 +34:06:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151325_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
Preparing report for the candidate 151325_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151336_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151336_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.99 +26:25:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151348_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151348_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:55.14 +32:26:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151356_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151356_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151378_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
Preparing report for the candidate 151378_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151386_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151386_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:26.48 +34:06:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151400_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151400_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151401_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151401_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:44.97 +31:09:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151402_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151402_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:13.45 +28:37:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151409_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151409_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.83 +32:33:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151414_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151414_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151419_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151419_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:32.38 +32:41:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151422_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151422_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.56 +33:12:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151423_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151423_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.29 +31:44:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151434_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151434_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151435_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151435_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.80 +29:47:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151439_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
Preparing report for the candidate 151439_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151447_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151447_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151452_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151452_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:36.55 +30:33:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151468_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151468_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:45.74 +28:00:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151474_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151474_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.51 +29:45:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151480_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151480_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151484_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
Preparing report for the candidate 151484_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151488_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151488_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:35.80 +31:24:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151509_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 151509_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.19 +31:04:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76531_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 76531_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:37.62 +29:52:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144771_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 144771_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.30 +32:10:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100144_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
Preparing report for the candidate 100144_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.37 +25:24:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.47 +28:42:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:53.70 +27:26:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49024_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 49024_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.99 +31:53:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.39 +26:08:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.33 +34:08:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-23_23-14-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
