This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 22.1240 2461335.6240 10.23 19:59:41.48 -13:47:02.0
27.87837 -21.23969 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3 Juno 0 0 0 10.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 19:59:41.48 -13:47:02.0: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 19:59:41.48 -13:47:02.0: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461335.6240,10.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261022.1240 10.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 22.1240 2461335.6240 10.47 20:30:49.26 -16:12:34.8
28.70077 -29.10266 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.324 Bamberga 1 0 1 10.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:30:49.26 -16:12:34.8: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:30:49.26 -16:12:34.8: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 22.1240* 20 30 49.26 -16 12 34.8 10.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461335.6240,10.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261022.1240 10.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 22.1240 2461335.6240 12.61 20:36:46.81 -20:31:57.1
24.61321 -31.98334 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.287 Nephthys 0 -0 0 12.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:36:46.81 -20:31:57.1: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:36:46.81 -20:31:57.1: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 22.1240* 20 36 46.81 -20 31 57.1 12.6 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461335.6240,12.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261022.1240 12.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.87051049 22.06.2026 08:53:22.106 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
First image: 2461213.87051049 22.06.2026 08:53:22.106 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Last image: 2461335.62431744 22.10.2026 02:58:51.027 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9367
Objects passed selection criteria: 9359
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7532
Average stars matched: 7346.5 (97.5372 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235556 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 22:47:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.87051049 22.06.2026 08:53:22.106 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
First image: 2461213.87051049 22.06.2026 08:53:22.106 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Last image: 2461335.62431744 22.10.2026 02:58:51.027 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 73
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 69259
Objects passed selection criteria: 69126
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 61190.8
Average stars matched: 59174.2 (96.7046 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 495056 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 22:49:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461335.62373166
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.503 -17:59:55.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.146 -18:00:02.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.503 -17:59:55.30
Second-epoch image center 20:26:40.146 -18:00:02.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0024 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:43.109 -17:59:28.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.503 -17:59:55.30
Second-epoch image center 20:26:43.109 -17:59:28.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0128 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:26:40.146 -18:00:02.22
Second-epoch second image center 20:26:43.109 -17:59:28.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01510 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0tAoFzWxXu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fJ5UzBX7DM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bdjn0q7leo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jHsCDYzz7b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10015 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2232 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2232 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Loaded 8358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6411 out of 6630 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6630 out of 10015 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.621300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.621300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10015 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2232 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2232 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Loaded 8358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6411 out of 6630 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6630 out of 10015 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 9886 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2069 to 315.1115 deg, Dec -23.2589 to -12.6185 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2069 to 315.1115 deg, Dec -23.2589 to -12.6185 deg
Loaded 8355 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6384 out of 6586 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6586 out of 9886 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
2.2 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
14.9 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.0tAoFzWxXu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=610, bad_region=1, passed=10015
Got 10015 stars (including 9399 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10015 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=1148 n_q2=1239 n_q3=1234 n_q4=1279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4900 N_valid=4900 bias_ra_arcsec=0.017 bias_dec_arcsec=0.045 median_sep_arcsec=0.337 p95_sep_arcsec=1.939 n_q1=1148 n_q2=1239 n_q3=1234 n_q4=1279 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fJ5UzBX7DM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=578, bad_region=0, passed=9886
Got 9886 stars (including 9300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9886 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.463 n_q1=1202 n_q2=1123 n_q3=1306 n_q4=1263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.208
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4894 N_valid=4894 bias_ra_arcsec=0.023 bias_dec_arcsec=0.020 median_sep_arcsec=0.360 p95_sep_arcsec=2.284 n_q1=1202 n_q2=1123 n_q3=1306 n_q4=1263 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bdjn0q7leo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=404, bad_region=0, passed=5260
Got 5260 stars (including 4853 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4770 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4759 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4759 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4771 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4757 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4757 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4757 stars left (next iteration limit 5234)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4757 robust_rms=13.671 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.482 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.482 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4757 robust_rms=0.515 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.874 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.874 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4757 robust_rms=0.323 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.418 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.418 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4757 robust_rms_before=0.864 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.341 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.323 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.450 worst_region_rms_after=0.418 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.048 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.418
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.450 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.450 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.341 arcsec matched=4757
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits N_match=4757 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=1173 n_q2=1260 n_q3=1180 n_q4=1144 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.221
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4757 N_valid=4757 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.186 bias_dec_arcsec=0.534 median_sep_arcsec=0.738 p95_sep_arcsec=1.912 n_q1=1173 n_q2=1260 n_q3=1180 n_q4=1144 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jHsCDYzz7b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=402, bad_region=0, passed=5159
Got 5159 stars (including 4752 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5159 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4661 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4649 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4649 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4649 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4662 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4648 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4648 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4648 stars left (next iteration limit 5113)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4648 robust_rms=13.311 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.848 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.848 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4648 robust_rms=0.497 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.820 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.820 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4648 robust_rms=0.319 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.414 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.414 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4648 robust_rms_before=0.855 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.339 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.319 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.462 worst_region_rms_after=0.414 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.053 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.414
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.sip_refit.8p9rrL/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.sip_refit.8p9rrL/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:43.118 -17:59:28.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5159 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.sip_refit.8p9rrL/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_2149729.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.sip_refit.8p9rrL/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.45WLjE' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_2149729.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.855 -> 0.319 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4648 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4527 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4527 pairs (4648 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4527 robust_rms=13.224 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.732 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.732 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4527 robust_rms=0.495 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.801 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.801 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4527 robust_rms=0.317 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.410 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.410 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4527 robust_rms_before=0.317 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.317 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.317 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.411 worst_region_rms_after=0.410 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.411 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.410
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.sip_refit.fg5cOj/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.sip_refit.fg5cOj/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:43.118 -17:59:28.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5159 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.sip_refit.fg5cOj/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_2152163.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.sip_refit.fg5cOj/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.un7Art' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_2152163.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.317 -> 0.317 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4527 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4527 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits N_match=4527 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=1140 n_q2=1170 n_q3=1169 n_q4=1048 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4527 N_valid=4527 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.265 p95_sep_arcsec=0.783 n_q1=1140 n_q2=1170 n_q3=1169 n_q4=1048 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits sigma_overall=0.392 worst_q_ratio=1.144
ref2=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.208
new1=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.221
new2=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.219
reference average sigma_overall=0.4115 worst_q_ratio=1.176
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277_astrometric_residuals.png (4894 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118_astrometric_residuals.png (4757 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119_astrometric_residuals.png (4527 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 19:59:41.48 -13:47:02.0: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:30:49.26 -16:12:34.8: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:30:49.26 -16:12:34.8: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 19:59:41.48 -13:47:02.0: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20623.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20640.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20623_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 20623_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20640_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 20640_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20651_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 20651_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:32.08 -17:03:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20658_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 20658_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:03.17 -13:19:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20670_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 20670_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:02.23 -15:23:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20685_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 20685_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:16.46 -13:15:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20705_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 20705_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:29.05 -21:58:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09228_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 09228_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:18.36 -14:16:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:59:41.48 -13:47:02.0
20:30:49.26 -16:12:34.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.503 -17:59:55.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.146 -18:00:02.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.503 -17:59:55.30
Second-epoch image center 20:26:40.146 -18:00:02.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0024 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:43.118 -17:59:28.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.503 -17:59:55.30
Second-epoch image center 20:26:43.118 -17:59:28.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0128 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:26:40.146 -18:00:02.22
Second-epoch second image center 20:26:43.118 -17:59:28.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01505 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WHZWnfJeDY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uxsF7gmwfw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5aimV6LBt8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dPxdTXkU9o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 76028 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2134 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2134 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Loaded 8365 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6515 out of 7320 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7320 out of 76028 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.466900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.466900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 76028 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2134 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2134 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Loaded 8365 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6515 out of 7320 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7320 out of 76028 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 74062 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2069 to 315.1336 deg, Dec -23.2623 to -12.6186 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2069 to 315.1336 deg, Dec -23.2623 to -12.6186 deg
Loaded 8367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6550 out of 7273 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7273 out of 74062 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 68 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
2.1 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
1.9 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
15.1 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.WHZWnfJeDY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=4260, bad_region=1, passed=76009
Got 76009 stars (including 71645 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76009 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.435 n_q1=1157 n_q2=1289 n_q3=1175 n_q4=1276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4897 N_valid=4897 bias_ra_arcsec=0.026 bias_dec_arcsec=0.039 median_sep_arcsec=0.335 p95_sep_arcsec=1.926 n_q1=1157 n_q2=1289 n_q3=1175 n_q4=1276 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.uxsF7gmwfw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=4004, bad_region=1, passed=74038
Got 74038 stars (including 69938 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74038 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.473 n_q1=1231 n_q2=1123 n_q3=1289 n_q4=1246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4889 N_valid=4889 bias_ra_arcsec=0.025 bias_dec_arcsec=0.013 median_sep_arcsec=0.360 p95_sep_arcsec=2.283 n_q1=1231 n_q2=1123 n_q3=1289 n_q4=1246 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5aimV6LBt8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1638, bad_region=3, passed=48387
Got 48387 stars (including 46647 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48387 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=13.021 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.214 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.214 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.510 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.884 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.884 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.314 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.394 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4899 robust_rms_before=0.865 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.314 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.441 worst_region_rms_after=0.394 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.050 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.394
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.865 -> 0.314 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits is a symbolic link
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4899 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4777 pairs (4899 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=12.980 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.162 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.162 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.507 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.864 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.864 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.313 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.388 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.388 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4777 robust_rms_before=0.312 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.312 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.313 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.389 worst_region_rms_after=0.388 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.389 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.388
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.312 -> 0.313 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits is a symbolic link
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits N_match=4777 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1284 n_q3=1173 n_q4=1051 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4777 N_valid=4777 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.197 bias_dec_arcsec=0.549 median_sep_arcsec=0.741 p95_sep_arcsec=1.756 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1284 n_q3=1173 n_q4=1051 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dPxdTXkU9o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1672, bad_region=4, passed=47965
Got 47965 stars (including 46192 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47965 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=12.772 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.682 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.682 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.493 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.872 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.872 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.312 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.398 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.398 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4899 robust_rms_before=0.314 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.319 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.312 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.398 worst_region_rms_after=0.398 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.398 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.398
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.398 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.398 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.314 arcsec matched=4899
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=1322 n_q2=1306 n_q3=1222 n_q4=1049 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.230
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4899 N_valid=4899 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.006 bias_dec_arcsec=0.011 median_sep_arcsec=0.264 p95_sep_arcsec=0.839 n_q1=1322 n_q2=1306 n_q3=1222 n_q4=1049 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_215946_TTUQ1b1x1_2408283_Q077jHMk/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:28:56.62 -17:53:30.9: 13.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:08:29.61 -13:38:24.9: 14.21 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:30:38.18 -18:01:53.8: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:30:35.65 -13:17:07.3: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:37:04.46 -14:12:57.0: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:18:24.51 -14:59:35.7: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:25:47.55 -17:46:23.6: 13.59 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:34:59.33 -15:48:16.0: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:23:31.58 -13:00:27.1: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:59:06.02 -16:34:53.7: 13.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:59:06.02 -16:34:53.7: 13.71 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:30:38.18 -18:01:53.8: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:18:24.51 -14:59:35.7: 13.90 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:30:35.65 -13:17:07.3: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:08:29.61 -13:38:24.9: 14.09 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:28:56.62 -17:53:30.9: 13.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:25:47.55 -17:46:23.6: 13.68 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:34:59.33 -15:48:16.0: 13.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:23:31.58 -13:00:27.1: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:37:04.46 -14:12:57.0: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:24.51 -14:59:35.7: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2439 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:29.61 -13:38:24.9: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0769 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:35.65 -13:17:07.3: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5286 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:47.55 -17:46:23.6: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9076 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:38.18 -18:01:53.8: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7513 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:06.02 -16:34:53.7: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7893 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:56.62 -17:53:30.9: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5960 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:59.33 -15:48:16.0: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7283 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:31.58 -13:00:27.1: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4177 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:04.46 -14:12:57.0: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7668 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:55:39.04 -22:44:44.3: 13.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:21:55.65 -14:22:09.7: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:57:38.23 -19:38:17.3: 12.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:35:49.73 -14:58:49.2: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:22:25.79 -15:19:55.7: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:58:36.08 -15:22:28.8: 12.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:54:47.59 -17:03:26.1: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:05:24.57 -12:52:26.1: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:57:59.46 -22:31:47.8: 12.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:58:22.96 -16:20:11.9: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:58:36.08 -15:22:28.8: 12.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:55:39.04 -22:44:44.3: 13.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:58:22.96 -16:20:11.9: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:05:24.57 -12:52:26.1: 12.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:35:49.73 -14:58:49.2: 12.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:57:59.46 -22:31:47.8: 13.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:21:55.65 -14:22:09.7: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:22:25.79 -15:19:55.7: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:22.96 -16:20:11.9: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2347 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:24.57 -12:52:26.1: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6465 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:57:38.23 -19:38:17.3: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:36.08 -15:22:28.8: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7774 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:39.04 -22:44:44.3: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6877 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:59.46 -22:31:47.8: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9203 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:49.73 -14:58:49.2: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3718 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:55.65 -14:22:09.7: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8588 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:25.79 -15:19:55.7: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2913 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:54:47.59 -17:03:26.1: 12.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:38.23 -19:38:17.3: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5564 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:47.59 -17:03:26.1: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6717 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:53:50.32 -18:58:54.6: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:29:23.57 -14:37:53.1: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:54:56.28 -22:18:30.4: 12.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:55:15.18 -13:07:20.8: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:23:04.08 -13:05:15.7: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:45:20.67 -15:47:15.0: 12.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:58:11.50 -22:29:43.4: 12.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:36:46.81 -20:31:57.1: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:53:50.32 -18:58:54.6: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:29:23.57 -14:37:53.1: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:54:56.28 -22:18:30.4: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:50.32 -18:58:54.6: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1092 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:56.28 -22:18:30.4: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1400 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:23.57 -14:37:53.1: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4232 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:55:15.18 -13:07:20.8: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:23:04.08 -13:05:15.7: 12.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:45:20.67 -15:47:15.0: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:15.18 -13:07:20.8: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4901 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:04.08 -13:05:15.7: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6629 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:20.67 -15:47:15.0: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4509 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:58:11.50 -22:29:43.4: 13.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:11.50 -22:29:43.4: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5720 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:03:38.54 -15:24:39.0: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:18:57.24 -14:18:21.5: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:36:46.81 -20:31:57.1: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:03:38.54 -15:24:39.0: 12.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:38.54 -15:24:39.0: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8245 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:18:57.24 -14:18:21.5: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:57.24 -14:18:21.5: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8162 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:54:04.51 -19:47:57.3: 12.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:51:54.77 -19:27:44.1: 12.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:03:37.23 -15:25:17.0: 12.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:09:34.47 -20:36:42.9: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:19:48.56 -15:00:38.6: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:57:59.23 -23:00:17.6: 14.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:54:04.51 -19:47:57.3: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:03:37.23 -15:25:17.0: 12.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:51:54.77 -19:27:44.1: 12.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:04.51 -19:47:57.3: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7859 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:09:34.47 -20:36:42.9: 12.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:37.23 -15:25:17.0: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1878 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:54.77 -19:27:44.1: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0486 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:34.47 -20:36:42.9: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9445 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:19:48.56 -15:00:38.6: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:57:59.23 -23:00:17.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:59.23 -23:00:17.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:48.56 -15:00:38.6: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2885 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:18:51.07 -15:51:46.4: 13.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:26:26.00 -17:23:38.3: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:14:18.13 -14:50:03.9: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:18:51.07 -15:51:46.4: 13.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:51.07 -15:51:46.4: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3935 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:26:26.00 -17:23:38.3: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:26.00 -17:23:38.3: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2607 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:14:18.13 -14:50:03.9: 12.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:30:48.96 -19:27:35.5: 13.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:18.13 -14:50:03.9: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3382 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:54:12.99 -22:54:47.9: 13.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:35:18.82 -13:34:35.7: 13.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:45:28.51 -22:36:58.2: 13.58 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:14:33.88 -14:19:44.5: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:30:48.96 -19:27:35.5: 13.45 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:54:12.99 -22:54:47.9: 14.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:48.96 -19:27:35.5: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3500 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:12.99 -22:54:47.9: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4727 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:35:18.82 -13:34:35.7: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:45:28.51 -22:36:58.2: 13.94 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:18.82 -13:34:35.7: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5834 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:28.51 -22:36:58.2: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5751 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:14:33.88 -14:19:44.5: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:33.88 -14:19:44.5: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5711 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:18:48.94 -13:00:30.1: 14.24 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:32:50.58 -19:00:52.1: 13.98 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:13:44.08 -14:12:54.3: 13.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:35:21.14 -16:33:48.2: 14.46 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:18:48.94 -13:00:30.1: 14.44 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:48.94 -13:00:30.1: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0918 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:32:50.58 -19:00:52.1: 14.19 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:13:44.08 -14:12:54.3: 13.65 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:50.58 -19:00:52.1: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0768 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:44.08 -14:12:54.3: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9910 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:32:35.94 -13:27:59.2: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:35:21.14 -16:33:48.2: 14.19 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:21.14 -16:33:48.2: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2725 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:30:17.35 -13:02:55.4: 13.75 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:35:47.72 -14:59:52.0: 14.77 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:22:34.82 -13:58:33.3: 14.51 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:32:35.94 -13:27:59.2: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:30:17.35 -13:02:55.4: 13.73 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:35.94 -13:27:59.2: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2532 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:17.35 -13:02:55.4: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3329 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:35:47.72 -14:59:52.0: 14.82 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:22:34.82 -13:58:33.3: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:47.72 -14:59:52.0: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4293 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:34.82 -13:58:33.3: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2924 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92872.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92363_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92363_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92368_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92368_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92370_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92370_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92382_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92382_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92383_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92383_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92385_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92385_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92386_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92386_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92389_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92389_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92392_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92392_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92395_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92395_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92397_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92397_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92398_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92398_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92400_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92400_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92402_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92402_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92405_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92405_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92406_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92406_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92408_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92408_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92409_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92409_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92410_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92410_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92411_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92411_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92412_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92412_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92414_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92414_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92415_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92415_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92451_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92451_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:41.48 -13:47:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92468_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92468_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:49.24 -16:12:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92507_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92507_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:02.24 -15:23:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92679_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92679_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92735_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92735_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92786_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92786_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92816_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92816_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92825_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92825_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:44.61 -20:54:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92856_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92856_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:09.47 -14:57:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92872_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 92872_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92885_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92885_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92891_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92891_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92917_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 92917_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93005_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93005_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93061_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93061_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:01.81 -12:46:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93092_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93092_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93138_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93138_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93165_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93165_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93171_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93171_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93197_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93197_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93200_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93200_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93220_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93220_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93244_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93244_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93304_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93304_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:58:12.25 -22:47:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93373_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93373_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93380_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93380_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93428_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93428_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93436_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93436_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93562_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93562_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:38.71 -14:20:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93608_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93608_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93622_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93622_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93659_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93659_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93674_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93674_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93676_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93676_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93685_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93685_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93689_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93689_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93714_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 93714_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86592_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 86592_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:03.19 -13:19:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07340_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 07340_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:29.06 -21:58:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88415_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 88415_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:45.35 -15:55:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86986_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 86986_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:26:13.23 -13:48:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86698_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 86698_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:08.56 -14:47:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48094_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 48094_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:16.47 -13:15:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68124_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 68124_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:27.30 -15:06:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62252_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 62252_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-58-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks