This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 22.0946 2461335.5946 12.27 16:38:40.39 -06:00:41.1
10.62456 25.89845 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 16:38:40.39 -06:00:41.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.537+/-0.037 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:38:40.39 -06:00:41.1: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:38:40.39 -06:00:41.1: 13.69 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461335.5946,12.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261022.0946 12.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 22.0946 2461335.5946 12.46 16:42:04.81 -06:26:44.8
10.75083 24.95367 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 16:42:04.81 -06:26:44.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.708+/-0.032 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:42:04.81 -06:26:44.8: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:42:04.81 -06:26:44.8: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461335.5946,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261022.0946 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 22.0946 2461335.5946 12.24 16:37:49.60 -06:15:08.6
10.27148 25.93702 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 16:37:49.60 -06:15:08.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.858+/-0.035 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:37:49.60 -06:15:08.6: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:37:49.60 -06:15:08.6: 13.81 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461335.5946,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261022.0946 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 22.0946 2461335.5946 12.42 16:44:35.67 -06:44:17.1
10.86712 24.27237 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 16:44:35.67 -06:44:17.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.803+/-0.041 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:44:35.67 -06:44:17.1: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:44:35.67 -06:44:17.1: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461335.5946,12.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261022.0946 12.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 22.0946 2461335.5946 12.31 16:40:05.66 -06:17:34.2
10.58576 25.44817 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.9" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 16:40:05.66 -06:17:34.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.211+/-0.031 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:40:05.66 -06:17:34.2: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:40:05.66 -06:17:34.2: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461335.5946,12.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261022.0946 12.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 22.0946 2461335.5946 12.38 16:42:15.28 -06:31:43.8
10.70159 24.87131 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 16:42:15.28 -06:31:43.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.496+/-0.035 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:42:15.28 -06:31:43.8: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:42:15.28 -06:31:43.8: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461335.5946,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261022.0946 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 22.0946 2461335.5946 12.34 16:43:46.02 -06:42:55.3
10.76211 24.45560 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 16:43:46.02 -06:42:55.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.486+/-0.035 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:43:46.02 -06:42:55.3: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:43:46.02 -06:42:55.3: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461335.5946,12.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261022.0946 12.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 22.0946 2461335.5946 12.31 16:39:57.81 -06:19:41.7
10.53310 25.45523 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 16:39:57.81 -06:19:41.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.373+/-0.033 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:39:57.81 -06:19:41.7: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:39:57.81 -06:19:41.7: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461335.5946,12.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261022.0946 12.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 22.0946 2461335.5946 12.04 16:43:51.38 -06:32:02.4
10.94117 24.53827 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 16:43:51.38 -06:32:02.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.541+/-0.038 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:43:51.38 -06:32:02.4: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:43:51.38 -06:32:02.4: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461335.5946,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261022.0946 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 22.0946 2461335.5946 12.29 16:38:44.66 -06:09:56.6
10.49368 25.79721 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" Gaia DR3 4353039415667435904
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.970 G 13.100 G 0.739030000000 F
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:38:44.66 -06:09:56.6: 13.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:38:44.66 -06:09:56.6: 13.63 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4353039415667435904,2461335.5946,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4353039415667435904 20261022.0946 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461209.78168976 18.06.2026 06:45:27.995 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
First image: 2461209.78168976 18.06.2026 06:45:27.995 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
Last image: 2461335.59484227 22.10.2026 02:16:24.372 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9812
Objects passed selection criteria: 9765
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6398
Average stars matched: 6304.75 (98.5425 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236176 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 22:51:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461209.78168976 18.06.2026 06:45:27.995 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
First image: 2461209.78168976 18.06.2026 06:45:27.995 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
Last image: 2461335.59484227 22.10.2026 02:16:24.372 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 176
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.10
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 31 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 73965
Objects passed selection criteria: 73809
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 53811.5
Average stars matched: 52496.5 (97.5563 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 296152 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 22:52:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461335.59426350
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.681 -02:00:34.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.653 -01:59:56.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.681 -02:00:34.62
Second-epoch image center 17:08:34.653 -01:59:56.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0105 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:37.580 -02:00:31.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.681 -02:00:34.62
Second-epoch image center 17:08:37.580 -02:00:31.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0121 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:34.653 -01:59:56.86
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:37.580 -02:00:31.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01547 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cGV9Efny81
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CWcuQn1cUi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lsqvTfQe9r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nAfsasnNDh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits and wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits and wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits and wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.2827 to 265.0184 deg, Dec -7.2731 to +3.2531 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.2827 to 265.0184 deg, Dec -7.2731 to 3.2531 deg
Loaded 5654 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4806 out of 5032 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5032 out of 11295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.808500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.808500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.2827 to 265.0184 deg, Dec -7.2731 to +3.2531 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.2827 to 265.0184 deg, Dec -7.2731 to 3.2531 deg
Loaded 5654 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4806 out of 5032 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5032 out of 11295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 10096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.2847 to 265.0190 deg, Dec -7.2498 to +3.2658 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.2847 to 265.0190 deg, Dec -7.2498 to 3.2658 deg
Loaded 5657 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4773 out of 4969 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4969 out of 10096 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
2.3 pix Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
15.3 mag. Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.cGV9Efny81 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=667, bad_region=0, passed=11295
Got 11295 stars (including 10621 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4807 stars left (next iteration limit 5287)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits N_match=4807 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.574 n_q1=1471 n_q2=1483 n_q3=800 n_q4=1053 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4807 N_valid=4807 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.013 bias_dec_arcsec=0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.345 p95_sep_arcsec=2.520 n_q1=1471 n_q2=1483 n_q3=800 n_q4=1053 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits -region wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CWcuQn1cUi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=574, bad_region=0, passed=10096
Got 10096 stars (including 9507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10096 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5271)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.664 n_q1=1564 n_q2=1382 n_q3=856 n_q4=989 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.313
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4791 N_valid=4791 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.017 bias_dec_arcsec=0.007 median_sep_arcsec=0.365 p95_sep_arcsec=2.671 n_q1=1564 n_q2=1382 n_q3=856 n_q4=989 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits -region wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lsqvTfQe9r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=159, bad_region=0, passed=2199
Got 2199 stars (including 2036 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2199 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2195 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 1940 stars left (next iteration limit 2132)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1940 robust_rms=13.951 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.509 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.509 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1940 robust_rms=0.525 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.709 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.709 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1940 robust_rms=0.378 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.514 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.514 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1940 robust_rms_before=0.807 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.431 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.378 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.616 worst_region_rms_after=0.514 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.030 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.514
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.sip_refit.sVwdor/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.sip_refit.sVwdor/candidate.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.614 -01:59:57.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 2199 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.sip_refit.sVwdor/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_2307044.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.sip_refit.sVwdor/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.aTNN5Y' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_2307044.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.807 -> 0.378 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 1940 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 1852 pairs (1940 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1852 robust_rms=13.736 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.289 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.289 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1852 robust_rms=0.521 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.689 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.689 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1852 robust_rms=0.375 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.517 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.517 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1852 robust_rms_before=0.375 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.375 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.375 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.517 worst_region_rms_after=0.517 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.517 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.517
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.517 vs 0.517 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits N_match=1852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=788 n_q2=501 n_q3=310 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=1852 N_valid=1852 bias_ra_arcsec=0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.308 p95_sep_arcsec=0.875 n_q1=788 n_q2=501 n_q3=310 n_q4=253 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nAfsasnNDh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=163, bad_region=0, passed=2186
Got 2186 stars (including 2020 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2186 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 1933 stars left (next iteration limit 2125)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1933 robust_rms=13.624 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.506 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.506 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1933 robust_rms=0.515 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.704 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.704 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1933 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.521 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.521 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1933 robust_rms_before=0.832 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.441 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.630 worst_region_rms_after=0.521 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.125 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.521
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.sip_refit.Oay1jW/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.sip_refit.Oay1jW/candidate.fits
Image size: 942.1'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:37.545 -02:00:31.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 2186 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.sip_refit.Oay1jW/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_2307014.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.sip_refit.Oay1jW/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.HmQYNk' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_2307014.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.832 -> 0.393 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 1933 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 1852 pairs (1933 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1852 robust_rms=13.460 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.248 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.248 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1852 robust_rms=0.515 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.678 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.678 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1852 robust_rms=0.389 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.516 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.516 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1852 robust_rms_before=0.387 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.387 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.389 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.516 worst_region_rms_after=0.516 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.516 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.516
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.516 vs 0.516 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits N_match=1852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.466 n_q1=773 n_q2=526 n_q3=287 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=1852 N_valid=1852 bias_ra_arcsec=0.011 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.313 p95_sep_arcsec=0.919 n_q1=773 n_q2=526 n_q3=287 n_q4=266 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits sigma_overall=0.487 worst_q_ratio=1.177
ref2=Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits sigma_overall=0.506 worst_q_ratio=1.313
new1=fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.149
new2=fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits sigma_overall=0.396 worst_q_ratio=1.176
reference average sigma_overall=0.4965 worst_q_ratio=1.245
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214_astrometric_residuals.png (4807 matched stars from wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204_astrometric_residuals.png (4791 matched stars from wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076_astrometric_residuals.png (1852 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077_astrometric_residuals.png (1852 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20312_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 20312_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:38.18 -00:47:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20348_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 20348_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:12.46 -00:43:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20363_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 20363_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:20.87 -06:13:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20364_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 20364_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:35.84 -03:04:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.681 -02:00:34.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.614 -01:59:57.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.681 -02:00:34.62
Second-epoch image center 17:08:34.614 -01:59:57.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0103 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Image size: 942.1'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:37.545 -02:00:31.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.681 -02:00:34.62
Second-epoch image center 17:08:37.545 -02:00:31.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0120 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:34.614 -01:59:57.49
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:37.545 -02:00:31.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01548 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1PB0Rk3BEL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hUhrBTgrHX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f0h7rX814k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1TQve4HfVv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits and wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits and wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits and wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 87529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.2784 to 265.0198 deg, Dec -7.2734 to +3.2546 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.2784 to 265.0198 deg, Dec -7.2734 to 3.2546 deg
Loaded 5661 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4355 out of 5072 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5072 out of 87529 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.663800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.663800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.10
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 87529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.2784 to 265.0198 deg, Dec -7.2734 to +3.2546 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.2784 to 265.0198 deg, Dec -7.2734 to 3.2546 deg
Loaded 5661 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4355 out of 5072 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5072 out of 87529 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 78112 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.2823 to 265.0195 deg, Dec -7.2544 to +3.2694 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.2823 to 265.0195 deg, Dec -7.2544 to 3.2694 deg
Loaded 5665 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4394 out of 5058 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5058 out of 78112 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 142 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
2.2 pix Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
15.4 mag. Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1PB0Rk3BEL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=6017, bad_region=1, passed=87519
Got 87519 stars (including 81374 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87519 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5280)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.589 n_q1=1442 n_q2=1467 n_q3=832 n_q4=1059 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4800 N_valid=4800 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.010 bias_dec_arcsec=0.007 median_sep_arcsec=0.343 p95_sep_arcsec=2.327 n_q1=1442 n_q2=1467 n_q3=832 n_q4=1059 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits -region wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hUhrBTgrHX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=5246, bad_region=1, passed=78098
Got 78098 stars (including 72739 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 78098 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78098 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78098 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78098 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4794 stars left (next iteration limit 5273)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits N_match=4794 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.630 n_q1=1558 n_q2=1359 n_q3=896 n_q4=981 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4794 N_valid=4794 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.017 bias_dec_arcsec=0.013 median_sep_arcsec=0.360 p95_sep_arcsec=2.509 n_q1=1558 n_q2=1359 n_q3=896 n_q4=981 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits -region wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.f0h7rX814k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=731, bad_region=5, passed=25720
Got 25720 stars (including 24933 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25720 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4764 stars left (next iteration limit 5240)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4764 robust_rms=13.128 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.329 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.329 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4764 robust_rms=0.551 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.783 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.783 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4764 robust_rms=0.418 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.562 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.562 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4764 robust_rms_before=0.414 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.427 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.418 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.549 worst_region_rms_after=0.562 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.549 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.562
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.549 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.549 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.414 arcsec matched=4764
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits N_match=4764 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.497 n_q1=2122 n_q2=1271 n_q3=814 n_q4=557 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4764 N_valid=4764 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.007 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.343 p95_sep_arcsec=1.161 n_q1=2122 n_q2=1271 n_q3=814 n_q4=557 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1TQve4HfVv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=684, bad_region=7, passed=25584
Got 25584 stars (including 24833 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25584 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4767 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=13.135 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.754 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.754 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.551 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.779 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.779 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.415 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.577 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.577 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4767 robust_rms_before=0.415 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.420 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.415 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.558 worst_region_rms_after=0.577 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.580 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.577
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.558 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.558 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.415 arcsec matched=4767
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits N_match=4767 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.497 n_q1=2098 n_q2=1298 n_q3=769 n_q4=602 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4767 N_valid=4767 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.341 p95_sep_arcsec=1.165 n_q1=2098 n_q2=1298 n_q3=769 n_q4=602 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_211803_TTUQ1b1x1_3521797_xy2DHuBg/wcs_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:53:09.14 +03:05:43.7: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 17:18:42.66 +01:52:45.8: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 17:13:32.49 +02:53:38.5: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 17:12:25.20 +00:19:33.3: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 17:14:01.39 +01:08:02.2: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 17:13:50.55 +02:21:22.5: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:42:47.63 +00:11:20.8: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 17:18:42.66 +01:52:45.8: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 17:14:01.39 +01:08:02.2: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 17:13:32.49 +02:53:38.5: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:18:42.66 +01:52:45.8: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7883 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:53:09.14 +03:05:43.7: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:01.39 +01:08:02.2: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9671 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:13:32.49 +02:53:38.5: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1803 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:53:09.14 +03:05:43.7: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3809 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 17:12:25.20 +00:19:33.3: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 17:13:50.55 +02:21:22.5: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:25.20 +00:19:33.3: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7869 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:13:50.55 +02:21:22.5: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4634 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:42:47.63 +00:11:20.8: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:47.63 +00:11:20.8: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0252 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 17:05:32.16 +02:49:24.9: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:57:11.56 -04:04:02.3: 11.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 17:19:55.44 +02:07:24.5: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:57:10.73 -04:04:45.3: 11.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:47:16.39 -01:56:17.9: 11.70 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 17:26:58.20 +02:20:29.4: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 17:19:55.44 +02:07:24.5: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:56:53.01 +03:07:14.8: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:55.44 +02:07:24.5: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4383 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 17:05:32.16 +02:49:24.9: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:57:10.73 -04:04:45.3: 11.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:05:32.16 +02:49:24.9: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3312 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:57:11.56 -04:04:02.3: 11.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:10.73 -04:04:45.3: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8489 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:47:16.39 -01:56:17.9: 11.78 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:16.39 -01:56:17.9: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.0062 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:11.56 -04:04:02.3: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8840 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 17:38:55.48 +02:38:38.2: 13.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 17:26:58.20 +02:20:29.4: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:26:58.20 +02:20:29.4: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1686 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:56:53.01 +03:07:14.8: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:53.01 +03:07:14.8: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8475 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 17:19:52.50 +02:09:41.4: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 17:38:55.48 +02:38:38.2: 13.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:38:55.48 +02:38:38.2: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4977 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 17:19:52.50 +02:09:41.4: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:52.50 +02:09:41.4: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9665 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 17:09:42.02 -00:03:01.6: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 17:12:21.16 +02:55:09.7: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 17:09:42.02 -00:03:01.6: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:42.02 -00:03:01.6: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1240 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:38:40.39 -06:00:41.1: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 17:12:21.16 +02:55:09.7: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:42:40.60 -06:34:29.4: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:42:04.81 -06:26:44.8: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:21.16 +02:55:09.7: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5203 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:37:49.60 -06:15:08.6: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:38:40.39 -06:00:41.1: 13.69 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:44:35.67 -06:44:17.1: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:42:04.81 -06:26:44.8: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:40:05.66 -06:17:34.2: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:42:40.60 -06:34:29.4: 13.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:42:40.60 -06:34:29.4: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4160 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:38:40.39 -06:00:41.1: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.2633 delta=1.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:42:04.81 -06:26:44.8: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.4550 delta=1.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:42:15.28 -06:31:43.8: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:37:49.60 -06:15:08.6: 13.81 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:37:49.60 -06:15:08.6: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.2305 delta=1.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:40:05.66 -06:17:34.2: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:44:35.67 -06:44:17.1: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:44:35.67 -06:44:17.1: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4195 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:40:05.66 -06:17:34.2: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3120 delta=1.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:42:15.28 -06:31:43.8: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:42:15.28 -06:31:43.8: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3508 delta=1.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:43:46.02 -06:42:55.3: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:43:46.02 -06:42:55.3: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:43:46.02 -06:42:55.3: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3393 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:39:57.81 -06:19:41.7: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:39:57.81 -06:19:41.7: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:39:57.81 -06:19:41.7: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2895 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:43:51.38 -06:32:02.4: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:43:51.38 -06:32:02.4: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:43:51.38 -06:32:02.4: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0130 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0214.fits at 16:38:44.66 -06:09:56.6: 13.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-59-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits at 16:38:44.66 -06:09:56.6: 13.63 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:38:44.66 -06:09:56.6: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.2721 delta=1.33 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out97975.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out62873.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out62987.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64036.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64037.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64562.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66325.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74351.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74833.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81021.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84940.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 31s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101780_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 101780_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101782_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 101782_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101783_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 101783_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101789_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 101789_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101798_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 101798_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101802_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 101802_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101804_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 101804_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:04.33 -01:55:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101805_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 101805_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:26.72 -00:29:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101806_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 101806_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101807_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 101807_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101808_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 101808_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:26.79 -00:53:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101809_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 101809_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:21.92 +01:06:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101810_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 101810_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:33.87 +02:03:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101912_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 101912_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:22.51 +01:37:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101970_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 101970_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:25.13 -02:12:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102035_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102035_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:43.47 +01:23:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102075_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102075_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:10.73 -03:08:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102080_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102080_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102087_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102087_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102096_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102096_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102101_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102101_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102114_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102114_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102143_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102143_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:02.83 -06:04:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102192_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102192_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:57.30 -02:23:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102235_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102235_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102274_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102274_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102309_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102309_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102312_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102312_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:44.69 +00:58:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102313_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102313_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102339_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102339_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:21.60 -01:57:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102356_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102356_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:56.55 -02:46:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102372_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102372_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:09.59 +01:33:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102408_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102408_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102414_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102414_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:14.61 -01:06:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102470_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102470_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:15.81 -05:51:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102490_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 102490_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98153_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 98153_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:35.67 -06:11:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98468_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 98468_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:31.25 -04:00:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74351_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 74351_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64561_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 64561_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:55.39 -06:25:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63452_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63452_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:27.70 -06:36:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98148_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 98148_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:29.60 -06:07:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98135_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 98135_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:56.38 -06:34:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97975_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 97975_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:40.60 -06:34:29.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.42, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.40)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.590 4352790616802121984 250.66835611232 -06.57424499176 12.9581 12.1946 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.590#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64562_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 64562_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39809_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 39809_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:38.17 -00:47:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39860_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 39860_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:12.42 -00:43:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84940_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 84940_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62873_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 62873_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74833_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 74833_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64036_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 64036_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63211_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63211_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:51.91 -06:39:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78507_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 78507_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:46.30 -06:05:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83233_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 83233_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:18.48 -06:13:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68240_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 68240_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:39.43 -05:50:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78306_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 78306_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:35.78 -03:04:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66809_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 66809_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:49.13 -05:46:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62987_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 62987_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79638_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 79638_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:10.63 -05:43:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63764_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63764_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:07.23 -06:33:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78581_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 78581_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:28.43 -06:06:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83874_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 83874_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:18.58 -06:13:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72711_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 72711_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:32.23 -05:56:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66325_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 66325_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62618_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 62618_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:04.35 -06:45:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62470_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 62470_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:40.40 -06:48:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87106_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 87106_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:58.72 -05:35:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62646_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 62646_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:51.54 -06:45:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63536_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63536_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:08.86 -06:36:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63250_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63250_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:19.02 -06:39:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13196_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 13196_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:13.00 +01:53:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63493_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63493_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:40.35 -06:37:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79143_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 79143_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:13.59 -06:07:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62657_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 62657_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:00.35 -06:45:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86542_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 86542_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:25.69 -06:18:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79814_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 79814_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:26.01 -06:08:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64037_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 64037_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85117_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 85117_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:20.81 -06:13:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64881_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 64881_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:08.01 -06:22:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64156_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 64156_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:33.32 -06:30:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63147_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63147_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:10.39 -06:40:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64938_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 64938_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:03.79 -06:22:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82308_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 82308_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:06.57 -06:11:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64170_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 64170_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:19.13 -06:29:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63218_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63218_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:35.38 -06:39:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64384_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 64384_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:54.66 -06:27:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68824_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 68824_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:38.65 -06:17:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77061_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 77061_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:05.25 -06:16:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63167_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63167_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:23.46 -06:40:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62609_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 62609_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:59.04 -06:45:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76797_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 76797_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:53.73 -05:59:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63457_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63457_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:05.68 -06:36:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63339_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63339_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:30.72 -06:37:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64783_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 64783_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:06.92 -06:24:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65049_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 65049_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:02.95 -06:21:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62840_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 62840_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:21.81 -06:43:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78618_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 78618_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:20.01 -06:07:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76136_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 76136_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:55.54 -06:02:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79032_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 79032_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:35.71 -06:08:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62501_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 62501_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:50.22 -06:47:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63971_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63971_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:12.22 -06:31:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83951_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 83951_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:23.32 -06:14:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63605_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63605_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:13.16 -06:35:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63979_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63979_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:54.35 -06:31:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69861_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 69861_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:04.77 -05:50:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86468_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 86468_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:17.89 -06:18:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64529_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 64529_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:26.74 -06:27:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63001_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63001_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:31.27 -06:42:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62461_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 62461_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:51.58 -06:48:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53900_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53900_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:12.23 -02:14:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79463_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 79463_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:52.91 -06:08:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78602_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 78602_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:05.75 -06:07:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64358_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 64358_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:52.69 -06:27:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64882_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 64882_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:18.72 -06:22:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66657_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 66657_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:43.16 -05:46:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63924_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63924_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:10.30 -06:32:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81021_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 81021_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64306_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 64306_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:59.34 -06:29:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76212_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 76212_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:00.00 -06:03:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64146_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 64146_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:34.12 -06:30:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76281_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 76281_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:30.72 -06:03:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63185_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63185_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:35.69 -06:39:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63846_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63846_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:29.27 -06:33:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62852_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 62852_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:06.39 -06:43:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50116_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 50116_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:30.66 -01:49:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63329_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63329_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:37.01 -06:37:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75357_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 75357_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:19.66 -06:01:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83812_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 83812_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:18.93 -06:16:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62927_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 62927_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:07.62 -06:43:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63347_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63347_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:48.37 -06:38:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62625_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 62625_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:21.85 -06:45:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66924_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 66924_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:36.12 -05:27:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64210_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 64210_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:16.96 -06:29:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75891_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 75891_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:41.08 -06:02:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65155_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 65155_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:32.85 -06:20:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76671_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 76671_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:58.78 -06:03:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63046_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63046_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:52.14 -06:41:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79059_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 79059_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:54.55 -06:06:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77629_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 77629_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:25.89 -06:05:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74390_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 74390_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:20.04 -05:58:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62608_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 62608_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:55.81 -06:45:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86345_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 86345_fd_Oph-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_21-16-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
