This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.4260 2461334.9260 12.10 10:27:14.33 +09:12:27.9
233.80420 51.55940 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.16 Psyche -0 0 1 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:27:14.33 +09:12:27.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:27:14.33 +09:12:27.9: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.4260* 10 27 14.33 +09 12 27.9 12.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.9260,12.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.4260 12.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.4260 2461334.9260 12.66 10:12:37.80 +17:06:16.6
219.80067 52.05143 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.196 Philomela -1 -0 1 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:12:37.80 +17:06:16.6: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:12:37.80 +17:06:16.6: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.4260* 10 12 37.80 +17 06 16.6 12.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.9260,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.4260 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.4260 2461334.9260 13.29 11:01:27.23 +13:06:53.9
236.05282 60.73069 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.42 Isis -1 0 1 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 11:01:27.23 +13:06:53.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 11:01:27.23 +13:06:53.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.4260* 11 01 27.23 +13 06 53.9 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.9260,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.4260 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.4260 2461334.9260 13.90 10:19:52.56 +14:48:30.0
224.39801 52.71019 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.351 Yrsa -0 -0 0 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:19:52.56 +14:48:30.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:19:52.56 +14:48:30.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.4260* 10 19 52.56 +14 48 30.0 13.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.9260,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.4260 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.4260 2461334.9260 14.05 10:12:19.62 +13:54:42.1
224.41684 50.67393 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.487 Venetia -0 -0 1 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:12:19.62 +13:54:42.1: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:12:19.62 +13:54:42.1: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.4260* 10 12 19.62 +13 54 42.1 14.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.9260,14.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.4260 14.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.4260 2461334.9260 13.71 10:44:31.71 +12:35:48.3
232.69633 56.95174 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.94 Aurora -0 0 0 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:44:31.71 +12:35:48.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:44:31.71 +12:35:48.3: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.4260* 10 44 31.71 +12 35 48.3 13.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.9260,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.4260 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.4260 2461334.9260 13.99 10:14:34.36 +17:32:30.0
219.42480 52.64579 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.134 Sophrosyne 1 -0 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:14:34.36 +17:32:30.0: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:14:34.36 +17:32:30.0: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.4260* 10 14 34.36 +17 32 30.0 14.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.9260,13.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.4260 13.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
First image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Last image: 2461334.92632122 21.10.2026 10:13:44.153 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5506
Objects passed selection criteria: 5491
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4561.5
Average stars matched: 4481.5 (98.2462 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232072 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 05:16:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
First image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Last image: 2461334.92632122 21.10.2026 10:13:44.153 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 88
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27859
Objects passed selection criteria: 27773
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24771.5
Average stars matched: 23858.8 (96.3153 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 256664 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 05:16:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461334.92566917
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Image size: 944.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:08.238 +13:59:54.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76
Second-epoch image center 10:40:08.238 +13:59:54.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0332 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Image size: 944.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:05.628 +13:59:14.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76
Second-epoch image center 10:40:05.628 +13:59:14.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0275 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:40:08.238 +13:59:54.66
Second-epoch second image center 10:40:05.628 +13:59:14.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01536 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Sbs5iTNlHq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NmeQIPjg5l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BEX9zE18tw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T8xCzdYOkG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2604 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2604 deg
Loaded 4240 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3428 out of 3506 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3506 out of 5744 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.729050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.729050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2604 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2604 deg
Loaded 4240 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3428 out of 3506 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3506 out of 5744 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 5709 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7036 to 168.1827 deg, Dec +8.6403 to +19.2435 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7036 to 168.1827 deg, Dec 8.6403 to 19.2435 deg
Loaded 4243 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3432 out of 3504 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3504 out of 5709 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
2.4 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Sbs5iTNlHq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5744
Got 5744 stars (including 5420 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4407 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4399 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4406 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4399 stars left (next iteration limit 4838)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=4399 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=1096 n_q2=1045 n_q3=1189 n_q4=1069 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4399 N_valid=4399 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.011 bias_dec_arcsec=0.017 median_sep_arcsec=0.321 p95_sep_arcsec=1.459 n_q1=1096 n_q2=1045 n_q3=1189 n_q4=1069 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NmeQIPjg5l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=309, bad_region=0, passed=5709
Got 5709 stars (including 5396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5709 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4405 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4405 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4397 stars left (next iteration limit 4836)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits N_match=4397 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=1094 n_q2=1056 n_q3=1184 n_q4=1063 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4397 N_valid=4397 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.021 bias_dec_arcsec=0.007 median_sep_arcsec=0.322 p95_sep_arcsec=1.382 n_q1=1094 n_q2=1056 n_q3=1184 n_q4=1063 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.BEX9zE18tw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=229, bad_region=0, passed=3456
Got 3456 stars (including 3225 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3456 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013117 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010493 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2814 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2814 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 2815 stars left (next iteration limit 3095)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2815 robust_rms=11.606 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.518 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.518 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2815 robust_rms=0.606 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.829 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.821 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2815 robust_rms=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.436 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.392 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2815 robust_rms_before=1.400 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.323 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.402 worst_region_rms_after=0.436 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.537 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.392
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.402 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.402 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.323 arcsec matched=2815
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits N_match=2815 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=686 n_q2=691 n_q3=727 n_q4=711 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2815 N_valid=2815 bias_ra_arcsec=0.708 bias_dec_arcsec=0.575 median_sep_arcsec=1.321 p95_sep_arcsec=2.771 n_q1=686 n_q2=691 n_q3=727 n_q4=711 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.T8xCzdYOkG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=225, bad_region=0, passed=3448
Got 3448 stars (including 3218 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3448 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 2811 stars left (next iteration limit 3092)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2811 robust_rms=11.691 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.135 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.135 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2811 robust_rms=0.627 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.870 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.870 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2811 robust_rms=0.348 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.451 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.365 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2811 robust_rms_before=1.400 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.326 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.348 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.415 worst_region_rms_after=0.451 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.617 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.365
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.415 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.415 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.326 arcsec matched=2811
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits N_match=2811 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=681 n_q2=692 n_q3=733 n_q4=705 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2811 N_valid=2811 bias_ra_arcsec=0.729 bias_dec_arcsec=0.578 median_sep_arcsec=1.294 p95_sep_arcsec=2.679 n_q1=681 n_q2=692 n_q3=733 n_q4=705 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits sigma_overall=0.405 worst_q_ratio=1.140
ref2=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits sigma_overall=0.396 worst_q_ratio=1.172
new1=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits sigma_overall=0.333 worst_q_ratio=1.240
new2=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.263
reference average sigma_overall=0.4005 worst_q_ratio=1.156
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141_astrometric_residuals.png (4399 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142_astrometric_residuals.png (4397 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428_astrometric_residuals.png (2815 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429_astrometric_residuals.png (2811 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:15:12.07 +11:41:08.8: 10.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:15:12.07 +11:41:08.8: 10.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.98 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:12.07 +11:41:08.8: ref_mag=10.98 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9501 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20266_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 20266_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Image size: 944.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:08.238 +13:59:54.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76
Second-epoch image center 10:40:08.238 +13:59:54.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0332 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Image size: 944.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:05.628 +13:59:14.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76
Second-epoch image center 10:40:05.628 +13:59:14.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0275 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:40:08.238 +13:59:54.66
Second-epoch second image center 10:40:05.628 +13:59:14.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01536 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xfwNrnD7aT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KNXGiVe3HC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XN2EVjhR7B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hhFo0294Bk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29548 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2694 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2694 deg
Loaded 4250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3390 out of 3597 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3597 out of 29548 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.605650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.605650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29548 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2694 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2694 deg
Loaded 4250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3390 out of 3597 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3597 out of 29548 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 29453 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7036 to 168.1940 deg, Dec +8.6403 to +19.2611 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7036 to 168.1940 deg, Dec 8.6403 to 19.2611 deg
Loaded 4245 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3386 out of 3596 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3596 out of 29453 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 75 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
2.2 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xfwNrnD7aT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1176, bad_region=0, passed=29525
Got 29525 stars (including 28308 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29525 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4403 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4403 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4398 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4398 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4398 stars left (next iteration limit 4836)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=4398 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.449 n_q1=1120 n_q2=1047 n_q3=1180 n_q4=1051 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4398 N_valid=4398 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.025 bias_dec_arcsec=0.024 median_sep_arcsec=0.316 p95_sep_arcsec=1.409 n_q1=1120 n_q2=1047 n_q3=1180 n_q4=1051 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KNXGiVe3HC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1170, bad_region=0, passed=29431
Got 29431 stars (including 28231 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29431 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4400 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4394 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4394 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4400 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4394 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4394 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4394 stars left (next iteration limit 4833)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits N_match=4394 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=1112 n_q2=1039 n_q3=1188 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4394 N_valid=4394 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.031 bias_dec_arcsec=0.010 median_sep_arcsec=0.320 p95_sep_arcsec=1.379 n_q1=1112 n_q2=1039 n_q3=1188 n_q4=1055 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XN2EVjhR7B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=548, bad_region=43, passed=20289
Got 20289 stars (including 19675 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20289 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013117 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010493 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4331 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4323 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4323 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4323 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4331 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4323 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4323 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4323 stars left (next iteration limit 4755)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4323 robust_rms=11.697 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.997 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.997 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4323 robust_rms=0.593 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.910 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.910 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4323 robust_rms=0.368 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.451 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.406 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4323 robust_rms_before=1.399 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.344 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.368 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.408 worst_region_rms_after=0.451 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.532 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.406
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.408 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.408 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.344 arcsec matched=4323
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits N_match=4323 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=1142 n_q2=1020 n_q3=1105 n_q4=1056 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4323 N_valid=4323 bias_ra_arcsec=0.684 bias_dec_arcsec=0.572 median_sep_arcsec=1.307 p95_sep_arcsec=2.674 n_q1=1142 n_q2=1020 n_q3=1105 n_q4=1056 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hhFo0294Bk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=645, bad_region=45, passed=20641
Got 20641 stars (including 19919 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20641 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4321 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4321 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4314 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4314 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4314 stars left (next iteration limit 4744)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4314 robust_rms=11.609 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.764 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.764 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4314 robust_rms=0.626 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.912 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.912 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4314 robust_rms=0.370 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.466 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.408 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4314 robust_rms_before=1.391 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.332 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.370 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.414 worst_region_rms_after=0.466 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.601 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.408
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.414 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.414 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.332 arcsec matched=4314
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits N_match=4314 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=1129 n_q2=1019 n_q3=1106 n_q4=1060 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4314 N_valid=4314 bias_ra_arcsec=0.698 bias_dec_arcsec=0.577 median_sep_arcsec=1.288 p95_sep_arcsec=2.603 n_q1=1129 n_q2=1019 n_q3=1106 n_q4=1060 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_051427_TTUQ1b1x1_351670_GBkSsFEY/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:59:33.42 +11:20:41.0: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:55:27.23 +10:01:55.3: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:26:28.13 +12:04:57.1: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:43.55 +14:13:16.8: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:26.83 +09:25:56.2: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:17:11.70 +11:58:38.8: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:42:35.23 +13:25:48.4: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:14:14.70 +14:09:34.7: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:59:33.42 +11:20:41.0: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:42:35.23 +13:25:48.4: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:26.83 +09:25:56.2: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:17:11.70 +11:58:38.8: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:43.55 +14:13:16.8: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:26:28.13 +12:04:57.1: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:31:01.81 +17:50:07.8: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:59:33.42 +11:20:41.0: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6707 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:35.23 +13:25:48.4: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7938 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:55:27.23 +10:01:55.3: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:26.83 +09:25:56.2: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8935 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:20:28.29 +10:06:24.6: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:17:11.70 +11:58:38.8: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6025 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:43.55 +14:13:16.8: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3032 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:26:28.13 +12:04:57.1: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8228 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:55:27.23 +10:01:55.3: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7692 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:14:14.70 +14:09:34.7: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:14:14.70 +14:09:34.7: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5145 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:20:28.29 +10:06:24.6: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:31:01.81 +17:50:07.8: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:28.29 +10:06:24.6: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9496 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:31:01.81 +17:50:07.8: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3642 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:12:37.80 +17:06:16.6: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:15:12.05 +11:41:09.0: 11.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:43.52 +12:29:19.4: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:27:14.33 +09:12:27.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:20:56.05 +12:29:13.6: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:17:47.01 +11:17:52.9: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 11:01:27.23 +13:06:53.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:19:52.56 +14:48:30.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:12:37.80 +17:06:16.6: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:15:12.05 +11:41:09.0: 11.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:43.52 +12:29:19.4: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:27:14.33 +09:12:27.9: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.13 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:12.05 +11:41:09.0: ref_mag=11.13 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1829 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:43.52 +12:29:19.4: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6492 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:20:56.05 +12:29:13.6: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:17:47.01 +11:17:52.9: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:56.05 +12:29:13.6: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1816 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:17:47.01 +11:17:52.9: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7352 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:12:19.62 +13:54:42.1: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 11:01:27.23 +13:06:53.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:19:52.56 +14:48:30.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:26:32.60 +11:17:50.5: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:12:19.62 +13:54:42.1: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:14:34.36 +17:32:30.0: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:41.64 +18:20:02.6: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:44:31.71 +12:35:48.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:39.02 +18:12:18.0: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:26:32.60 +11:17:50.5: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:26:32.60 +11:17:50.5: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7387 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:14:34.36 +17:32:30.0: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:44:31.71 +12:35:48.3: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:41.64 +18:20:02.6: 14.47 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:39.02 +18:12:18.0: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:41.64 +18:20:02.6: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2358 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:39.02 +18:12:18.0: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1628 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:36.79 +13:04:40.2: 14.44 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:37.07 +11:38:38.5: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:28:32.93 +14:19:16.1: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:36.79 +13:04:40.2: 14.49 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:36.79 +13:04:40.2: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2105 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:37.07 +11:38:38.5: 14.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:37.07 +11:38:38.5: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2484 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:28:32.93 +14:19:16.1: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:28:32.93 +14:19:16.1: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9267 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:23.97 +14:13:20.4: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:44.03 +17:40:41.5: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:11:18.74 +10:13:29.7: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:23.97 +14:13:20.4: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:23.97 +14:13:20.4: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3381 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:11:18.74 +10:13:29.7: 14.45 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:18.74 +10:13:29.7: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2304 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:44.03 +17:40:41.5: 14.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:44.03 +17:40:41.5: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2571 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:21.19 +17:13:20.0: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:47.98 +09:47:00.4: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:39.58 +10:30:35.2: 14.36 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:21.19 +17:13:20.0: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:21.19 +17:13:20.0: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3632 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:47.98 +09:47:00.4: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:39.58 +10:30:35.2: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:47.98 +09:47:00.4: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1880 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:39.58 +10:30:35.2: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2800 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:49.21 +11:57:02.3: 14.33 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:41.91 +17:32:13.7: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:49.21 +11:57:02.3: 14.18 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:49.21 +11:57:02.3: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2365 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:11:03.67 +12:09:47.6: 14.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:41.91 +17:32:13.7: 14.45 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:41.91 +17:32:13.7: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4400 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:11:03.67 +12:09:47.6: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:03.67 +12:09:47.6: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3724 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:16.90 +16:54:09.0: 14.45 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:24.68 +09:47:39.6: 14.35 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:16.90 +16:54:09.0: 14.45 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:16.90 +16:54:09.0: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2700 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:49.64 +16:17:37.5: 14.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:24.68 +09:47:39.6: 14.31 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:24.68 +09:47:39.6: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2652 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:49.64 +16:17:37.5: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:49.64 +16:17:37.5: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4302 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:49.60 +12:43:53.3: 14.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:22.09 +15:34:03.8: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:49.60 +12:43:53.3: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:49.60 +12:43:53.3: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3818 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:42.70 +10:34:46.5: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:22.09 +15:34:03.8: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:22.09 +15:34:03.8: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5278 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:42.70 +10:34:46.5: 14.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:42.70 +10:34:46.5: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3145 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:27.45 +18:40:27.3: 15.23 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:05.44 +13:46:46.8: 14.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:27.45 +18:40:27.3: 14.93 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:27.45 +18:40:27.3: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5062 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:05.44 +13:46:46.8: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:55.66 +16:39:55.2: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:05.44 +13:46:46.8: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4214 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:55.66 +16:39:55.2: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:55.66 +16:39:55.2: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5256 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:13:13.40 +09:53:34.4: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:13:13.40 +09:53:34.4: 14.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:59.98 +10:31:49.8: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:13.40 +09:53:34.4: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4254 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:30.83 +13:03:37.8: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:59.98 +10:31:49.8: 14.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:59.98 +10:31:49.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4327 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:30.83 +13:03:37.8: 14.30 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:30.83 +13:03:37.8: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2246 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:32.54 +15:42:45.2: 14.49 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:48.71 +18:43:03.0: 15.08 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:32.54 +15:42:45.2: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:32.54 +15:42:45.2: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4180 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:11:30.94 +09:22:56.6: 14.94 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:48.71 +18:43:03.0: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:48.71 +18:43:03.0: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5391 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:11:30.94 +09:22:56.6: 14.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:30.94 +09:22:56.6: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3534 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:50.70 +18:59:22.3: 14.33 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:47.07 +11:18:37.4: 14.44 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:50.70 +18:59:22.3: 14.50 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:50.70 +18:59:22.3: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3466 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:13:22.63 +09:51:49.3: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:47.07 +11:18:37.4: 14.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:30.01 +14:07:54.0: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:47.07 +11:18:37.4: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3995 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:21.22 +10:11:45.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:19.25 +11:52:23.7: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:01.91 +16:20:08.4: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:28.76 +13:23:56.2: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:13:22.63 +09:51:49.3: 14.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:22.63 +09:51:49.3: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3762 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:30.01 +14:07:54.0: 14.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:30.01 +14:07:54.0: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3921 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:21.22 +10:11:45.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:21.22 +10:11:45.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:19.25 +11:52:23.7: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:19.25 +11:52:23.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4655 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:01.91 +16:20:08.4: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:01.91 +16:20:08.4: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7063 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:20.99 +16:20:13.0: 15.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:11:08.65 +16:33:46.5: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:28.76 +13:23:56.2: 15.10 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:28.76 +13:23:56.2: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4859 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:20.99 +16:20:13.0: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:11:08.65 +16:33:46.5: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:20.99 +16:20:13.0: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7218 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:08.65 +16:33:46.5: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5319 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:40.45 +13:06:10.4: 14.53 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:45.09 +14:53:53.2: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:04.31 +13:22:52.8: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:40.45 +13:06:10.4: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:45.09 +14:53:53.2: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:04.31 +13:22:52.8: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:40.45 +13:06:10.4: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4807 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:45.09 +14:53:53.2: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7493 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:04.31 +13:22:52.8: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6156 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32278.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32316.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32601.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32618.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32659.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32680.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32702.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32157_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32157_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32158_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32158_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:14:43.72 +16:31:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32159_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32159_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32161_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32161_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:32.28 +16:10:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32162_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32162_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:12:39.53 +17:42:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32163_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32163_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32166_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32166_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32167_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32167_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32168_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32168_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32169_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32169_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32170_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32170_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:16:28.71 +09:05:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32172_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32172_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32173_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32173_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:15:06.91 +12:30:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32174_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32174_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32175_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32175_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32210_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32210_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32278_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 32278_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32316_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 32316_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32445_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32445_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32494_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32494_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:08:39.21 +17:13:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32534_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32534_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32583_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32583_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32601_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 32601_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32618_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 32618_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32621_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32621_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:08:38.70 +11:59:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32659_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 32659_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32672_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32672_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32680_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 32680_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32702_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 32702_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32703_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32703_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32744_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32744_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32761_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32761_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32765_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32765_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32766_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32766_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32768_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32768_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32771_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32771_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32772_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32772_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32776_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32776_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32787_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32787_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32807_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32807_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32819_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32819_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32823_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32823_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:13.45 +09:56:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32824_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32824_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32825_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32825_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32827_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32827_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32839_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32839_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32846_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32846_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32857_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32857_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32862_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32862_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32866_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32866_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32871_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32871_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32882_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32882_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32884_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32884_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32885_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32885_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32886_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32886_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:51.22 +18:48:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32889_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32889_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32891_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32891_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32895_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32895_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32903_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32903_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32910_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32910_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32914_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32914_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32916_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32916_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32918_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32918_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32926_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32926_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32932_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32932_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32962_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32962_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32968_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32968_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32969_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32969_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32974_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32974_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32976_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32976_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32990_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32990_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32991_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32991_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:15:02.02 +19:01:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32998_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32998_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33011_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33011_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33047_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33047_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
