This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.4195 2461334.9195 13.35 04:34:50.90 +02:30:56.8
193.30955 -28.62499 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.618 Elfriede -0 -0 0 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:34:50.90 +02:30:56.8: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:34:50.90 +02:30:56.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.4195* 04 34 50.90 +02 30 56.8 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.9195,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.4195 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.4195 2461334.9195 13.62 03:58:08.52 -00:57:24.2
190.65653 -38.18260 galactic Eri Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.483 Seppina -1 -0 1 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:58:08.52 -00:57:24.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:58:08.52 -00:57:24.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.4195* 03 58 08.52 +00 57 24.2 13.6 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.9195,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.4195 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.4195 2461334.9195 14.30 04:19:23.33 -01:35:57.4
194.93436 -34.09690 galactic Eri Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1326 Losaka -0 0 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:19:23.33 -01:35:57.4: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:19:23.33 -01:35:57.4: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.4195* 04 19 23.33 -01 35 57.4 14.3 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.9195,14.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.4195 14.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67043058 09.01.2026 04:05:15.202 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
First image: 2461049.67043058 09.01.2026 04:05:15.202 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Last image: 2461334.92084257 21.10.2026 10:05:50.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9404
Objects passed selection criteria: 9395
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8908.25
Average stars matched: 8595 (96.4836 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236548 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 05:08:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67043058 09.01.2026 04:05:15.202 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
First image: 2461049.67043058 09.01.2026 04:05:15.202 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Last image: 2461334.92084257 21.10.2026 10:05:50.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 63
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 52477
Objects passed selection criteria: 52339
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 49802.8
Average stars matched: 47911.2 (96.202 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 271360 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 05:09:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461334.91817292
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:09.564 -01:59:59.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:08.439 -02:00:14.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:09.564 -01:59:59.04
Second-epoch image center 04:17:08.439 -02:00:14.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0064 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:10.733 -01:59:58.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:09.564 -01:59:59.04
Second-epoch image center 04:17:10.733 -01:59:58.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0049 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:17:08.439 -02:00:14.95
Second-epoch second image center 04:17:10.733 -01:59:58.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01059 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o1qhrIDtSY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f9FaJm8xIp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IahfPqaIx1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t8cucsyq3O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9074 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3098 to +3.3309 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3098 to 3.3309 deg
Loaded 5822 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4709 out of 5011 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5011 out of 9074 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.917800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.917800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9074 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3098 to +3.3309 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3098 to 3.3309 deg
Loaded 5822 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4709 out of 5011 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5011 out of 9074 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 9104 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3933 to 72.2586 deg, Dec -7.3134 to +3.3286 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3933 to 72.2586 deg, Dec -7.3134 to 3.3286 deg
Loaded 5824 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4709 out of 5009 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5009 out of 9104 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
2.0 pix Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
2.7 pix fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
2.6 pix fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
15.5 mag. Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.o1qhrIDtSY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=748, bad_region=0, passed=9074
Got 9074 stars (including 8321 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9074 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.217 n_q1=1419 n_q2=915 n_q3=1464 n_q4=1102 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4900 N_valid=4900 bias_ra_arcsec=0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.229 p95_sep_arcsec=0.734 n_q1=1419 n_q2=915 n_q3=1464 n_q4=1102 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits -region wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.f9FaJm8xIp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=759, bad_region=0, passed=9104
Got 9104 stars (including 8332 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9104 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.233 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.232 n_q1=1419 n_q2=919 n_q3=1459 n_q4=1100 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.354
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4897 N_valid=4897 bias_ra_arcsec=0.006 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.234 p95_sep_arcsec=0.734 n_q1=1419 n_q2=919 n_q3=1459 n_q4=1100 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits -region wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.IahfPqaIx1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, bad_region=0, passed=8191
Got 8191 stars (including 7509 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8191 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=12.883 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.290 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.290 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.545 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.590 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.590 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.337 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.356 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.312 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4905 robust_rms_before=0.891 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.348 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.337 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.383 worst_region_rms_after=0.356 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.163 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.312
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.383 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.383 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.348 arcsec matched=4905
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=1486 n_q2=897 n_q3=1440 n_q4=1082 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4905 N_valid=4905 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.442 bias_dec_arcsec=0.350 median_sep_arcsec=0.767 p95_sep_arcsec=1.808 n_q1=1486 n_q2=897 n_q3=1440 n_q4=1082 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.t8cucsyq3O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=587, bad_region=0, passed=9534
Got 9534 stars (including 8939 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9534 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=13.081 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.583 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.583 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=0.420 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.661 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.661 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=0.266 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.337 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.337 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4902 robust_rms_before=0.741 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.269 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.266 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.363 worst_region_rms_after=0.337 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.974 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.337
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.363 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.363 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.269 arcsec matched=4902
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=1485 n_q2=893 n_q3=1437 n_q4=1087 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4902 N_valid=4902 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.302 bias_dec_arcsec=0.345 median_sep_arcsec=0.621 p95_sep_arcsec=1.552 n_q1=1485 n_q2=893 n_q3=1437 n_q4=1087 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits sigma_overall=0.269 worst_q_ratio=1.277
ref2=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.354
new1=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits sigma_overall=0.356 worst_q_ratio=1.151
new2=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits sigma_overall=0.274 worst_q_ratio=1.233
reference average sigma_overall=0.2725 worst_q_ratio=1.3155
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422_astrometric_residuals.png (4905 matched stars from wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423_astrometric_residuals.png (4902 matched stars from wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:26:05.92 +01:26:25.7: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:20:54.43 -02:15:10.0: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:24:07.53 -00:48:59.9: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:22:27.52 -00:55:37.1: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:25:18.49 -01:44:34.3: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:20:39.03 -02:03:59.3: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:26:05.92 +01:26:25.7: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:20:54.43 -02:15:10.0: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:24:07.53 -00:48:59.9: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:22:27.52 -00:55:37.1: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:05.92 +01:26:25.7: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2861 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:07.53 -00:48:59.9: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2408 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:54.43 -02:15:10.0: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1998 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:27.52 -00:55:37.1: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2522 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:20:39.03 -02:03:59.3: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:25:18.49 -01:44:34.3: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:39.03 -02:03:59.3: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2562 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:18.49 -01:44:34.3: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2693 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20697_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20697_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20704_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20704_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20705_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20705_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20706_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20706_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20707_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20707_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20713_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20713_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Eri-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:09.564 -01:59:59.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:08.439 -02:00:14.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:09.564 -01:59:59.04
Second-epoch image center 04:17:08.439 -02:00:14.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0064 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:10.733 -01:59:58.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:09.564 -01:59:59.04
Second-epoch image center 04:17:10.733 -01:59:58.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0049 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:17:08.439 -02:00:14.95
Second-epoch second image center 04:17:10.733 -01:59:58.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01059 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ns21dCNq8q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T4i3OLwNUa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8x2qeKI0Zy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OhlRZxdjzF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 53209 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3105 to +3.3357 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3105 to 3.3357 deg
Loaded 5825 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4456 out of 5076 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5076 out of 53209 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.806600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.806600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 53209 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3105 to +3.3357 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3105 to 3.3357 deg
Loaded 5825 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4456 out of 5076 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5076 out of 53209 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 53499 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3874 to 72.2632 deg, Dec -7.3133 to +3.3329 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3874 to 72.2632 deg, Dec -7.3133 to 3.3329 deg
Loaded 5831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4443 out of 5078 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5078 out of 53499 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 49 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
1.9 pix Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
2.3 pix fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
2.5 pix fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
15.6 mag. Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Ns21dCNq8q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2903, bad_region=3, passed=53195
Got 53195 stars (including 50206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53195 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53195 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53195 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53195 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5405)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.231 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.210 n_q1=1384 n_q2=918 n_q3=1497 n_q4=1115 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4914 N_valid=4914 bias_ra_arcsec=0.008 bias_dec_arcsec=0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.222 p95_sep_arcsec=0.744 n_q1=1384 n_q2=918 n_q3=1497 n_q4=1115 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits -region wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.T4i3OLwNUa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=2925, bad_region=5, passed=53480
Got 53480 stars (including 50454 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53480 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5404)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.228 n_q1=1403 n_q2=921 n_q3=1488 n_q4=1101 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4913 N_valid=4913 bias_ra_arcsec=0.007 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.227 p95_sep_arcsec=0.722 n_q1=1403 n_q2=921 n_q3=1488 n_q4=1101 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits -region wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8x2qeKI0Zy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=39, blended=2799, bad_region=48, passed=45386
Got 45386 stars (including 42455 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45386 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=13.095 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.668 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.668 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.533 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.602 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.602 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.322 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.347 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.308 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4907 robust_rms_before=0.888 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.332 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.322 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.359 worst_region_rms_after=0.347 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.174 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.308
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.359 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.359 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.332 arcsec matched=4907
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1465 n_q2=909 n_q3=1438 n_q4=1095 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4907 N_valid=4907 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.465 bias_dec_arcsec=0.395 median_sep_arcsec=0.778 p95_sep_arcsec=1.898 n_q1=1465 n_q2=909 n_q3=1438 n_q4=1095 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OhlRZxdjzF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2275, bad_region=48, passed=48699
Got 48699 stars (including 46309 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48699 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48699 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48699 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48699 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4903 robust_rms=13.134 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.531 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.531 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4903 robust_rms=0.416 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.686 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.686 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4903 robust_rms=0.263 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.337 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.337 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4903 robust_rms_before=0.746 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.264 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.263 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.365 worst_region_rms_after=0.337 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.990 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.337
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.365 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.365 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.264 arcsec matched=4903
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.229 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1459 n_q2=895 n_q3=1461 n_q4=1088 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4903 N_valid=4903 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.310 bias_dec_arcsec=0.357 median_sep_arcsec=0.633 p95_sep_arcsec=1.570 n_q1=1459 n_q2=895 n_q3=1461 n_q4=1088 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-02-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_050642_TTUQ1b1x1_3677396_WLB0ijmT/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:57:55.46 -00:24:11.0: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:06:10.08 +01:33:12.3: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:37:21.56 +01:42:57.3: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:12:29.50 +02:38:09.8: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:47:46.62 +00:10:29.2: 14.36 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:26:35.32 -00:48:18.2: 11.31 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:24:09.09 +00:56:11.7: 13.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:52:30.29 +00:41:00.8: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:01:18.10 -01:13:59.9: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:57:55.46 -00:24:11.0: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:24:09.09 +00:56:11.7: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:37:21.56 +01:42:57.3: 14.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:12:29.50 +02:38:09.8: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:47:46.62 +00:10:29.2: 14.50 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:06:10.08 +01:33:12.3: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:52:30.29 +00:41:00.8: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:01:18.10 -01:13:59.9: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:09.09 +00:56:11.7: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3972 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:55.46 -00:24:11.0: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5539 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:26:35.32 -00:48:18.2: 11.32 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:29.50 +02:38:09.8: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2810 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:21.56 +01:42:57.3: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6024 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:10.08 +01:33:12.3: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0656 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:46.62 +00:10:29.2: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3567 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:30.29 +00:41:00.8: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0647 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.31 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:18.10 -01:13:59.9: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9961 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:35.32 -00:48:18.2: ref_mag=11.31 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6947 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:58:08.52 -00:57:24.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:34:50.90 +02:30:56.8: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:19:23.33 -01:35:57.4: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:46:21.93 +02:33:24.5: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:28:37.22 +02:39:07.2: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:35:53.35 -03:53:11.4: 15.00 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:46:01.36 +00:58:35.9: 15.10 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:00:08.17 +02:45:13.2: 15.34 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:58:08.52 -00:57:24.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:34:50.90 +02:30:56.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:19:23.33 -01:35:57.4: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:48:04.16 +02:20:58.9: 15.18 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:47:16.61 -05:51:10.8: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:28:37.22 +02:39:07.2: 15.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:37.22 +02:39:07.2: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6961 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:46:01.36 +00:58:35.9: 15.14 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:35:53.35 -03:53:11.4: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:46:21.93 +02:33:24.5: 15.02 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:01.36 +00:58:35.9: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6808 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:53.35 -03:53:11.4: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7257 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:21.93 +02:33:24.5: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6796 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:00:08.17 +02:45:13.2: 15.59 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:08.17 +02:45:13.2: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8405 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:48:04.16 +02:20:58.9: 15.03 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:47:16.61 -05:51:10.8: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:04.16 +02:20:58.9: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7877 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:16.61 -05:51:10.8: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7519 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:37:49.29 +02:40:35.8: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:56:31.94 -00:30:52.7: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:23:56.89 -05:37:19.7: 14.90 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:57:40.99 -02:54:04.5: 15.15 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:39:48.57 +02:16:13.0: 15.35 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:18:19.80 +02:31:23.1: 14.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:18:25.21 +02:27:54.1: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:56:31.94 -00:30:52.7: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:31.94 -00:30:52.7: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7697 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:37:49.29 +02:40:35.8: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:23:56.89 -05:37:19.7: 14.86 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:49.29 +02:40:35.8: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5741 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:56.89 -05:37:19.7: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7907 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:57:40.99 -02:54:04.5: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:40.99 -02:54:04.5: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8304 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:39:48.57 +02:16:13.0: 15.25 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:18:19.80 +02:31:23.1: 15.03 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:48.57 +02:16:13.0: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8207 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:19.80 +02:31:23.1: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8943 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:18:25.21 +02:27:54.1: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:25.21 +02:27:54.1: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7589 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:00:22.44 +03:00:09.7: 15.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:50:00.56 -03:30:01.2: 15.31 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:32:39.10 -04:48:48.6: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:03:31.36 -00:24:35.1: 15.47 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:52:50.95 +00:41:58.8: 15.12 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:28:26.11 -04:33:49.6: 15.14 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:50:00.56 -03:30:01.2: 15.43 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:00:22.44 +03:00:09.7: 15.31 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:00.56 -03:30:01.2: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9124 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:22.44 +03:00:09.7: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6849 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:32:39.10 -04:48:48.6: 15.06 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:52:50.95 +00:41:58.8: 15.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:03:31.36 -00:24:35.1: 15.23 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:50.95 +00:41:58.8: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9124 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:39.10 -04:48:48.6: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8762 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:31.36 -00:24:35.1: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0032 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:28:26.11 -04:33:49.6: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:26.11 -04:33:49.6: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9002 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out67929.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out68092.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out68639.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67337_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 67337_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67347_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 67347_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67353_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 67353_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:53.80 +00:23:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67365_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 67365_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67368_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 67368_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67373_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 67373_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67389_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 67389_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67391_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 67391_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67394_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 67394_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67396_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 67396_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67514_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 67514_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67624_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 67624_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67674_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 67674_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67755_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 67755_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67778_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 67778_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67844_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 67844_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67929_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 67929_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68092_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 68092_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68213_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68213_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68300_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68300_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:13.91 +03:04:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68312_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68312_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68427_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68427_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68555_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68555_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68639_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 68639_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68710_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68710_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68755_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68755_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68787_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68787_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68796_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68796_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68830_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68830_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68833_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68833_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68884_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68884_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68897_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68897_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68902_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68902_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68912_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68912_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68916_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68916_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68918_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68918_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68936_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68936_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68966_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68966_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68974_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68974_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68975_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68975_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68978_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68978_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68986_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68986_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68993_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 68993_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69015_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 69015_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69020_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 69020_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69028_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 69028_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69034_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 69034_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69039_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 69039_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69057_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 69057_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_05-05-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks