This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3936 2461334.8936 12.11 03:20:28.74 +16:08:19.2
167.23039 -33.61949 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.72 Feronia -0 0 0 12.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:20:28.74 +16:08:19.2: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:20:28.74 +16:08:19.2: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3936* 03 20 28.74 +16 08 19.2 12.1 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8936,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3936 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3936 2461334.8936 12.63 04:05:41.90 +17:31:37.6
175.07005 -25.10639 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato 0 0 0 12.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:05:41.90 +17:31:37.6: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:05:41.90 +17:31:37.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3936* 04 05 41.90 +17 31 37.6 12.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8936,12.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3936 12.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3936 2461334.8936 13.47 03:52:43.70 +14:37:56.4
175.06146 -29.35894 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.443 Photographica 0 -0 0 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:52:43.70 +14:37:56.4: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:52:43.70 +14:37:56.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3936* 03 52 43.70 +14 37 56.4 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8936,13.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3936 13.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3936 2461334.8936 13.72 03:41:30.76 +17:01:46.6
170.92419 -29.58194 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.131 Vala 0 -0 0 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:41:30.76 +17:01:46.6: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:41:30.76 +17:01:46.6: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3936* 03 41 30.76 +17 01 46.6 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8936,13.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3936 13.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3936 2461334.8936 13.79 03:18:10.10 +18:26:11.7
164.97873 -32.20109 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.586 Thekla -1 -1 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:10.10 +18:26:11.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:10.10 +18:26:11.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3936* 03 18 10.10 +18 26 11.7 13.8 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8936,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3936 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3936 2461334.8936 14.03 03:52:25.93 +15:39:29.3
174.15639 -28.70232 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.742 Edisona -1 0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:52:25.93 +15:39:29.3: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:52:25.93 +15:39:29.3: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3936* 03 52 25.93 +15 39 29.3 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8936,14.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3936 14.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3936 2461334.8936 14.50 03:53:46.24 +10:27:27.4
178.84270 -31.98975 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.655 Briseis -0 -0 0 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:53:46.24 +10:27:27.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:53:46.24 +10:27:27.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3936* 03 53 46.24 +10 27 27.4 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8936,14.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3936 14.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3936 2461334.8936 14.45 03:54:52.76 +10:46:19.9
178.77741 -31.57732 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1055 Tynka 1 -1 1 14.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:54:52.76 +10:46:19.9: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:54:52.76 +10:46:19.9: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3936* 03 54 52.76 +10 46 19.9 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8936,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3936 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3936 2461334.8936 14.54 03:06:26.81 +17:20:24.6
163.15147 -34.78127 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1424 Sundmania 0 0 0 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:06:26.81 +17:20:24.6: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:06:26.81 +17:20:24.6: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3936* 03 06 26.81 +17 20 24.6 14.5 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8936,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3936 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3936 2461334.8936 14.60 03:48:38.65 +15:26:04.9
173.61243 -29.51253 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1350 Rosselia -0 -0 1 14.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:48:38.65 +15:26:04.9: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:48:38.65 +15:26:04.9: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3936* 03 48 38.65 +15 26 04.9 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8936,14.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3936 14.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3936 2461334.8936 14.89 03:49:02.72 +18:43:51.8
171.04249 -27.11298 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1576 Fabiola -0 -0 1 15.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:49:02.72 +18:43:51.8: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:49:02.72 +18:43:51.8: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3936* 03 49 02.72 +18 43 51.8 14.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8936,14.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3936 14.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3936 2461334.8936 14.98 03:28:59.07 +15:01:57.9
169.94590 -33.09620 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1336 Zeelandia -1 -0 1 14.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:28:59.07 +15:01:57.9: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:28:59.07 +15:01:57.9: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3936* 03 28 59.07 +15 01 57.9 15.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8936,14.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3936 14.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
First image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Last image: 2461334.89387987 21.10.2026 09:27:01.221 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7845
Objects passed selection criteria: 7836
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7450.5
Average stars matched: 7255.75 (97.3861 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234248 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 04:32:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
First image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Last image: 2461334.89387987 21.10.2026 09:27:01.221 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 106
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.01
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 49438
Objects passed selection criteria: 49305
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 47531.5
Average stars matched: 45428 (95.5745 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 268328 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 04:33:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461334.89324830
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:32:57.184 +13:58:15.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:32:57.184 +13:58:15.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0977 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:32:54.875 +13:57:51.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:32:54.875 +13:57:51.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1086 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:32:57.184 +13:58:15.31
Second-epoch second image center 03:32:54.875 +13:57:51.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01147 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.se3VXLAp8p
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rsWjRuDum7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1KrDDtSjre
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aHah99WmSH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.950750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.950750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec +8.6182 to +19.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec 8.6182 to 19.2791 deg
Loaded 4354 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3736 out of 7722 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
2.0 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.se3VXLAp8p (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=551, bad_region=0, passed=7716
Got 7716 stars (including 7157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1380 n_q2=1359 n_q3=1203 n_q4=953 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.327
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4895 N_valid=4895 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.250 p95_sep_arcsec=0.766 n_q1=1380 n_q2=1359 n_q3=1203 n_q4=953 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.rsWjRuDum7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=536, bad_region=0, passed=7722
Got 7722 stars (including 7177 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1378 n_q2=1355 n_q3=1207 n_q4=960 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.311
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4900 N_valid=4900 bias_ra_arcsec=0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=0.008 median_sep_arcsec=0.253 p95_sep_arcsec=0.779 n_q1=1378 n_q2=1355 n_q3=1207 n_q4=960 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1KrDDtSjre (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=498, bad_region=0, passed=7304
Got 7304 stars (including 6797 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7304 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.3 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.3 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=13.674 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.799 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.799 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.547 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.666 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.666 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.320 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.377 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.284 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4893 robust_rms_before=1.079 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.327 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.320 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.382 worst_region_rms_after=0.377 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.140 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.284
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.382 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.382 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.327 arcsec matched=4893
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=1412 n_q2=1337 n_q3=1203 n_q4=941 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4893 N_valid=4893 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.451 bias_dec_arcsec=0.571 median_sep_arcsec=0.983 p95_sep_arcsec=1.892 n_q1=1412 n_q2=1337 n_q3=1203 n_q4=941 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aHah99WmSH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=507, bad_region=0, passed=7241
Got 7241 stars (including 6726 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7241 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.3 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.3 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=13.725 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.991 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.991 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=0.590 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.678 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.656 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.427 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.292 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4891 robust_rms_before=1.103 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.350 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.345 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.420 worst_region_rms_after=0.427 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.106 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.292
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.420 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.420 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.350 arcsec matched=4891
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1416 n_q2=1338 n_q3=1198 n_q4=939 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4891 N_valid=4891 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.443 bias_dec_arcsec=0.559 median_sep_arcsec=1.001 p95_sep_arcsec=1.895 n_q1=1416 n_q2=1338 n_q3=1198 n_q4=939 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.327
ref2=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.307 worst_q_ratio=1.311
new1=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits sigma_overall=0.323 worst_q_ratio=1.140
new2=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits sigma_overall=0.347 worst_q_ratio=1.166
reference average sigma_overall=0.306 worst_q_ratio=1.319
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391_astrometric_residuals.png (4891 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:38:55.24 +16:23:48.6: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:34:00.83 +16:04:03.4: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:29:23.57 +13:29:49.1: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:20:28.74 +16:08:19.2: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:20:28.74 +16:08:19.2: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:29:23.57 +13:29:49.1: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:34:00.83 +16:04:03.4: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:38:55.24 +16:23:48.6: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:55.24 +16:23:48.6: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3446 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:23.57 +13:29:49.1: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4438 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:00.83 +16:04:03.4: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4347 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20502.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20393_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 20393_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20502_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 20502_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20529_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 20529_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20531_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 20531_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05772_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 05772_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:28.65 +11:24:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
03:20:28.74 +16:08:19.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:32:57.184 +13:58:15.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:32:57.184 +13:58:15.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0977 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:32:54.875 +13:57:51.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:32:54.875 +13:57:51.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1086 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:32:57.184 +13:58:15.31
Second-epoch second image center 03:32:54.875 +13:57:51.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01147 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Xv0OvMw9zR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kEUw66wEtB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tV4iQTWWoT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eriZBUWMfa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.830300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.830300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.01
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.82
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.82
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 48560 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec +8.6183 to +19.2794 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec 8.6183 to 19.2794 deg
Loaded 4358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3320 out of 3753 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3753 out of 48560 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 84 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
1.9 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
2.0 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
1.9 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
15.8 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.7 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Xv0OvMw9zR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2222, bad_region=4, passed=48568
Got 48568 stars (including 46270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48568 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.252 n_q1=1362 n_q2=1350 n_q3=1192 n_q4=994 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.312
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4898 N_valid=4898 bias_ra_arcsec=0.008 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.245 p95_sep_arcsec=0.750 n_q1=1362 n_q2=1350 n_q3=1192 n_q4=994 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kEUw66wEtB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2192, bad_region=5, passed=48544
Got 48544 stars (including 46257 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48544 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1361 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1201 n_q4=986 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4899 N_valid=4899 bias_ra_arcsec=0.013 bias_dec_arcsec=0.007 median_sep_arcsec=0.245 p95_sep_arcsec=0.763 n_q1=1361 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1201 n_q4=986 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tV4iQTWWoT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2109, bad_region=45, passed=47095
Got 47095 stars (including 44850 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47095 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.3 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.3 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=13.772 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.650 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.650 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.539 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.674 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.674 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.307 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.369 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.285 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=1.068 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.315 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.307 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.364 worst_region_rms_after=0.369 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.135 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.285
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.364 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.315 arcsec matched=4879
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=1404 n_q2=1341 n_q3=1182 n_q4=952 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4879 N_valid=4879 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.460 bias_dec_arcsec=0.594 median_sep_arcsec=0.981 p95_sep_arcsec=1.866 n_q1=1404 n_q2=1341 n_q3=1182 n_q4=952 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.eriZBUWMfa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=2135, bad_region=47, passed=47211
Got 47211 stars (including 44941 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47211 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.3 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.3 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=13.889 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.702 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.702 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.577 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.652 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.651 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.326 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.399 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.293 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=1.090 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.326 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.385 worst_region_rms_after=0.399 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.095 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.293
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.385 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.385 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.328 arcsec matched=4876
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=1404 n_q2=1336 n_q3=1187 n_q4=949 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4876 N_valid=4876 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.459 bias_dec_arcsec=0.579 median_sep_arcsec=0.996 p95_sep_arcsec=1.870 n_q1=1404 n_q2=1336 n_q3=1187 n_q4=949 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-26-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_042956_TTUQ1b1x1_305033_1q61mRbc/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:50:23.59 +18:04:47.2: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:23:41.04 +18:49:38.8: 14.89 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:23:38.60 +18:59:19.0: 14.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:48:36.25 +15:12:43.9: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:26:59.17 +16:15:36.8: 15.04 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:36:58.30 +18:06:21.3: 14.61 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:11:36.52 +14:54:09.8: 15.41 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:36:29.33 +18:04:30.0: 14.95 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:00.91 +16:15:10.0: 14.98 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:09:50.06 +19:11:32.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:11:36.52 +14:54:09.8: 15.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:23:38.60 +18:59:19.0: 14.75 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:36:29.33 +18:04:30.0: 14.56 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:50:23.59 +18:04:47.2: 14.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:23:41.04 +18:49:38.8: 14.86 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:26:59.17 +16:15:36.8: 15.17 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:36:58.30 +18:06:21.3: 14.49 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:48:36.25 +15:12:43.9: 14.77 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:00.91 +16:15:10.0: 15.03 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:36:29.33 +18:04:30.0: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=15.0867 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:09:50.06 +19:11:32.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:36.52 +14:54:09.8: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0981 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:50.06 +19:11:32.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:38.60 +18:59:19.0: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=15.0701 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:59.17 +16:15:36.8: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0905 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:23.59 +18:04:47.2: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.9128 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:41.04 +18:49:38.8: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.1118 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:36:58.30 +18:06:21.3: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=15.1010 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:36.25 +15:12:43.9: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8803 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:00.91 +16:15:10.0: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0393 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:04:46.25 +15:34:45.0: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:28:23.94 +17:03:29.6: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:06:22.73 +18:50:44.2: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:10:17.94 +11:34:27.9: 15.03 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:28:24.34 +15:51:21.7: 14.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:07:26.57 +17:28:15.1: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:29:18.97 +18:36:44.7: 14.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:15:51.39 +09:09:21.2: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:11:15.22 +18:41:47.2: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:06:22.73 +18:50:44.2: 14.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:28:24.34 +15:51:21.7: 14.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:29:18.97 +18:36:44.7: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:22.73 +18:50:44.2: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8781 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:24.34 +15:51:21.7: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5798 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:18.97 +18:36:44.7: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.6460 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:28:23.94 +17:03:29.6: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:04:46.25 +15:34:45.0: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:10:17.94 +11:34:27.9: 14.82 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:07:26.57 +17:28:15.1: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:15:51.39 +09:09:21.2: 14.54 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:23.94 +17:03:29.6: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2265 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:04:46.25 +15:34:45.0: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6521 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:17.94 +11:34:27.9: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8077 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:26.57 +17:28:15.1: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0667 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:15:51.39 +09:09:21.2: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4547 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:11:15.22 +18:41:47.2: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:15.22 +18:41:47.2: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9345 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:14:21.32 +10:20:53.4: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:21:09.90 +17:40:37.2: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:40:18.58 +11:25:19.5: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:52:43.78 +17:21:23.6: 13.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:54:57.16 +18:23:12.6: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:48:33.60 +15:11:22.8: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:27:14.92 +16:00:08.3: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:05:41.90 +17:31:37.6: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:52:43.70 +14:37:56.4: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:11:20.48 +16:46:43.8: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:48:33.60 +15:11:22.8: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:40:18.58 +11:25:19.5: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:27:14.92 +16:00:08.3: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:14:21.32 +10:20:53.4: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:54:57.16 +18:23:12.6: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:52:43.78 +17:21:23.6: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:21:09.90 +17:40:37.2: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:05:41.90 +17:31:37.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:33.60 +15:11:22.8: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1111 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:27:14.92 +16:00:08.3: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.1463 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:18.58 +11:25:19.5: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4539 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:57.16 +18:23:12.6: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0844 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:21.32 +10:20:53.4: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0410 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:21:09.90 +17:40:37.2: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5413 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:43.78 +17:21:23.6: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2199 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:52:43.70 +14:37:56.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:11:20.48 +16:46:43.8: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:20.48 +16:46:43.8: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5407 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:10.10 +18:26:11.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:16.45 +17:05:14.8: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:41:30.76 +17:01:46.6: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:54:52.76 +10:46:19.9: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:52:25.93 +15:39:29.3: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:53:46.24 +10:27:27.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:06:26.81 +17:20:24.6: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:48:38.65 +15:26:04.9: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:41:30.76 +17:01:46.6: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:54:52.76 +10:46:19.9: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:53:46.24 +10:27:27.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:10.10 +18:26:11.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:16.45 +17:05:14.8: 14.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:52:25.93 +15:39:29.3: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:16.45 +17:05:14.8: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4855 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:06:26.81 +17:20:24.6: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:48:38.65 +15:26:04.9: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:07:23.74 +17:28:15.5: 14.69 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:07:23.74 +17:28:15.5: 14.89 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:23.74 +17:28:15.5: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6624 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:31:49.51 +15:08:05.1: 15.05 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:31:49.51 +15:08:05.1: 14.94 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:49.51 +15:08:05.1: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7742 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:57:42.96 +18:43:34.9: 14.99 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:57:42.96 +18:43:34.9: 14.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:42.96 +18:43:34.9: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8272 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:43:23.81 +18:09:01.3: 14.56 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:43:23.81 +18:09:01.3: 14.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:23.81 +18:09:01.3: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.8179 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:08:53.68 +17:45:38.5: 14.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:08:53.68 +17:45:38.5: 14.92 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:53.68 +17:45:38.5: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9441 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:08:49.39 +17:46:32.9: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:08:49.39 +17:46:32.9: 14.89 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:49.39 +17:46:32.9: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8630 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:49:02.72 +18:43:51.8: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:49:02.72 +18:43:51.8: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:40.45 +18:18:54.5: 15.34 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:56:16.08 +18:38:17.4: 15.23 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:40.45 +18:18:54.5: 15.35 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:40.45 +18:18:54.5: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9991 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:56:16.08 +18:38:17.4: 15.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:16.08 +18:38:17.4: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8160 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:35.46 +16:50:08.4: 15.32 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:09:56.48 +18:42:06.6: 15.27 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:54:43.85 +13:21:32.1: 15.49 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:15:43.90 +15:31:06.1: 15.19 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:28:59.07 +15:01:57.9: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:02:43.42 +17:43:52.0: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:35.46 +16:50:08.4: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:35.46 +16:50:08.4: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0845 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:09:56.48 +18:42:06.6: 14.81 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:05.97 +15:13:45.5: 15.20 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:56.48 +18:42:06.6: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0278 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:54:43.85 +13:21:32.1: 15.14 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:15:43.90 +15:31:06.1: 14.86 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:56:57.20 +17:18:07.1: 15.32 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:43.85 +13:21:32.1: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0436 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:15:43.90 +15:31:06.1: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0005 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:28:59.07 +15:01:57.9: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:27:43.01 +18:12:27.9: 15.34 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:02:43.42 +17:43:52.0: 15.54 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:43.42 +17:43:52.0: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1035 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:05.97 +15:13:45.5: 15.53 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:05.97 +15:13:45.5: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1195 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:56:57.20 +17:18:07.1: 15.81 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:57.20 +17:18:07.1: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.1601 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:27:43.01 +18:12:27.9: 15.55 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:27:43.01 +18:12:27.9: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0614 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:07:22.07 +16:51:04.7: 15.21 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:05:13.29 +17:21:16.6: 15.53 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:02:01.93 +17:21:27.8: 15.17 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:08:36.51 +09:21:14.8: 15.22 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:53:12.90 +16:55:19.4: 15.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:07:22.07 +16:51:04.7: 15.04 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:22.07 +16:51:04.7: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0740 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:05:13.29 +17:21:16.6: 15.16 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:01:33.34 +15:32:11.2: 15.63 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:13.29 +17:21:16.6: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0027 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:02:01.93 +17:21:27.8: 14.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:08:36.51 +09:21:14.8: 15.09 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:01.93 +17:21:27.8: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9330 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:36.51 +09:21:14.8: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8719 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:05:41.38 +17:20:24.9: 15.68 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:13:15.92 +18:18:34.2: 15.24 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:53:12.90 +16:55:19.4: 15.43 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:12.90 +16:55:19.4: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1071 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:01:33.34 +15:32:11.2: 15.10 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:33.34 +15:32:11.2: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0678 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:53:39.37 +18:02:02.7: 14.97 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:13:15.92 +18:18:34.2: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:11:59.88 +10:50:09.0: 15.29 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:15.92 +18:18:34.2: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1252 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:05:41.38 +17:20:24.9: 15.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:41.38 +17:20:24.9: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1989 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:10:05.04 +18:45:15.1: 15.31 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:33:41.90 +16:45:47.1: 15.24 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:20:29.84 +16:23:57.1: 15.49 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:53:39.37 +18:02:02.7: 15.13 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:39.37 +18:02:02.7: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1292 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:11:59.88 +10:50:09.0: 15.42 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:14:35.44 +18:43:48.9: 15.25 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:59.88 +10:50:09.0: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0389 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:33:41.90 +16:45:47.1: 15.36 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:10:05.04 +18:45:15.1: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:33:41.90 +16:45:47.1: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1806 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:05.04 +18:45:15.1: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1114 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:20:29.84 +16:23:57.1: 15.58 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.53 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:29.84 +16:23:57.1: ref_mag=15.53 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1759 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:05:51.77 +14:26:18.8: 15.25 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:12:39.52 +18:24:31.6: 15.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:14:35.44 +18:43:48.9: 14.98 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:35.44 +18:43:48.9: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1135 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:13:47.75 +18:17:48.9: 15.29 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:05:51.77 +14:26:18.8: 15.28 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:12:39.52 +18:24:31.6: 15.12 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:02:06.08 +11:30:53.3: 15.20 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:51.77 +14:26:18.8: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1216 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:12:39.52 +18:24:31.6: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1593 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:04.50 +14:19:40.4: 15.22 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:30.84 +09:56:32.4: 15.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:13:47.75 +18:17:48.9: 15.07 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:47.75 +18:17:48.9: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.2236 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:02:06.08 +11:30:53.3: 15.00 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:06.08 +11:30:53.3: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9580 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:04.50 +14:19:40.4: 15.63 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:30.84 +09:56:32.4: 15.39 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:04.50 +14:19:40.4: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1240 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:30.84 +09:56:32.4: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9261 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53835.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54093.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54197.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54216.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54319.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54592.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54604.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54628.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54694.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54906.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54965.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53589_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53589_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53590_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53590_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53591_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53591_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53592_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53592_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53593_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53593_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53594_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53594_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53597_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53597_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53598_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53598_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53599_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53599_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53601_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53601_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53603_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53603_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53605_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53605_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53609_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53609_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53614_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53614_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:00.55 +17:42:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53618_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53618_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53619_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53619_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53623_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53623_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53624_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53624_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:42.39 +16:18:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53632_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53632_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53634_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53634_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53635_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53635_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:15:57.73 +18:58:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53639_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53639_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53640_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53640_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:37.98 +17:28:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53641_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53641_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:37.21 +18:20:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53643_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53643_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53644_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53644_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53646_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53646_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53647_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53647_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53649_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53649_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53761_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53761_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53767_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53767_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:28.74 +16:08:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53835_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 53835_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53950_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53950_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54093_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 54093_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54109_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54109_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54197_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 54197_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54216_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 54216_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54319_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 54319_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54340_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54340_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:07:55.09 +16:03:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54566_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54566_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54592_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 54592_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54604_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 54604_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54628_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 54628_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54694_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 54694_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54720_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54720_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54826_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54826_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54830_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54830_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54834_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54834_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54880_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54880_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54889_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54889_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54906_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 54906_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54909_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54909_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54914_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54914_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54933_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54933_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54951_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54951_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54960_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54960_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54961_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54961_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54965_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 54965_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54969_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54969_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54974_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54974_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54990_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54990_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54993_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54993_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54997_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 54997_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55003_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55003_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55008_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55008_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55028_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55028_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55029_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55029_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55031_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55031_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55034_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55034_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55036_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55036_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55057_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55057_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55061_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55061_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55068_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55068_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55092_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55092_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55093_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55093_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55095_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55095_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55098_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55098_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55102_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55102_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55106_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55106_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55117_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55117_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55126_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55126_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55127_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 55127_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42495_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 42495_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:28.66 +11:24:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17153_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 17153_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
