This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3333 2461334.8333 13.06 04:32:04.59 +26:05:33.1
172.61923 -14.83719 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 11.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata -1 0 1 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:32:04.59 +26:05:33.1: 16.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:32:04.59 +26:05:33.1: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3333* 04 32 04.59 +26 05 33.1 13.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8333,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3333 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3333 2461334.8333 13.36 04:30:56.36 +25:58:39.7
172.53551 -15.10532 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 11.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia -0 0 1 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:56.36 +25:58:39.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:56.36 +25:58:39.7: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3333* 04 30 56.36 +25 58 39.7 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8333,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3333 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3333 2461334.8333 14.28 04:52:14.52 +21:43:08.4
179.12317 -14.01348 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 11.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.940 Kordula 1 0 1 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:14.52 +21:43:08.4: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:14.52 +21:43:08.4: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3333* 04 52 14.52 +21 43 08.4 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8333,14.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3333 14.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3333 2461334.8333 14.48 04:51:38.95 +23:50:47.6
177.30218 -12.82691 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 10.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1219 Britta 1 -0 1 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:38.95 +23:50:47.6: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:38.95 +23:50:47.6: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3333* 04 51 38.95 +23 50 47.6 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8333,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3333 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3333 2461334.8333 14.64 04:42:03.53 +20:28:28.8
178.63432 -16.65300 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 11.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.311 Claudia 1 -0 1 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:03.53 +20:28:28.8: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:03.53 +20:28:28.8: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3333* 04 42 03.53 +20 28 28.8 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8333,14.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3333 14.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3333 2461334.8333 15.24 04:20:05.66 +19:44:09.8
175.75372 -21.09234 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 11.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1167 Dubiago 1 0 1 15.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:05.66 +19:44:09.8: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:05.66 +19:44:09.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3333* 04 20 05.66 +19 44 09.8 15.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8333,15.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3333 15.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461334.83370400 21.10.2026 08:00:22.026 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10310
Objects passed selection criteria: 10269
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7839.5
Average stars matched: 7253 (92.5187 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235512 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 03:18:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461334.83370400 21.10.2026 08:00:22.026 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 107
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 76240
Objects passed selection criteria: 76023
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59619.8
Average stars matched: 55007.5 (92.2639 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 292344 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 03:19:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461334.83288130
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.865 +22:00:19.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:55.865 +22:00:19.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0117 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:58.699 +22:01:13.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:58.699 +22:01:13.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0286 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:55.865 +22:00:19.47
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:58.699 +22:01:13.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01856 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rTbQrnVwKU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GqxOrSxcUO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XtJI0TEhFQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aH136ptaci
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.991000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.991000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2796 deg
Loaded 5169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3956 out of 4300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4300 out of 11076 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.rTbQrnVwKU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=2517, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 8622 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4820 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4820 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1641 n_q2=611 n_q3=1816 n_q4=752 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4820 N_valid=4820 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.019 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.017 median_sep_arcsec=0.253 p95_sep_arcsec=1.217 n_q1=1641 n_q2=611 n_q3=1816 n_q4=752 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GqxOrSxcUO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=897, bad_region=2444, passed=11076
Got 11076 stars (including 7922 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4818 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4818 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1645 n_q2=622 n_q3=1785 n_q4=766 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4818 N_valid=4818 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.016 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.292 p95_sep_arcsec=1.156 n_q1=1645 n_q2=622 n_q3=1785 n_q4=766 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XtJI0TEhFQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=677, bad_region=3070, passed=9814
Got 9814 stars (including 6245 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9814 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4872 stars left (next iteration limit 5358)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=8.084 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.055 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.055 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.518 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.777 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.777 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.386 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.492 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.492 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4872 robust_rms_before=1.134 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.412 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.386 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.535 worst_region_rms_after=0.492 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.229 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.492
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.535 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.535 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.412 arcsec matched=4872
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits N_match=4872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=1432 n_q2=1148 n_q3=1469 n_q4=823 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4872 N_valid=4872 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.569 bias_dec_arcsec=0.687 median_sep_arcsec=1.030 p95_sep_arcsec=1.996 n_q1=1432 n_q2=1148 n_q3=1469 n_q4=823 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aH136ptaci (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=673, bad_region=3124, passed=9867
Got 9867 stars (including 6246 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9867 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5355)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=8.115 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.980 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.980 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.537 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.815 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.815 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.483 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.483 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=1.161 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.420 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.515 worst_region_rms_after=0.483 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.208 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.483
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.515 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.515 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.420 arcsec matched=4870
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.480 n_q1=1430 n_q2=1138 n_q3=1482 n_q4=820 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4870 N_valid=4870 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.604 bias_dec_arcsec=0.688 median_sep_arcsec=1.061 p95_sep_arcsec=2.097 n_q1=1430 n_q2=1138 n_q3=1482 n_q4=820 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.284
ref2=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.245
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.084
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits sigma_overall=0.442 worst_q_ratio=1.086
reference average sigma_overall=0.3385 worst_q_ratio=1.2645
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (4820 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4818 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454_astrometric_residuals.png (4872 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455_astrometric_residuals.png (4870 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:07.54 +22:37:22.8: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:55.54 +19:03:02.0: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:24:24.00 +17:53:04.0: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:55.54 +19:03:02.0: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:07.54 +22:37:22.8: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:24:24.00 +17:53:04.0: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:07.54 +22:37:22.8: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5289 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:55.54 +19:03:02.0: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5006 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:24.00 +17:53:04.0: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4084 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21880_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 21880_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21996_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 21996_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22013_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 22013_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.865 +22:00:19.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:55.865 +22:00:19.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0117 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:58.699 +22:01:13.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:58.699 +22:01:13.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0286 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:55.865 +22:00:19.47
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:58.699 +22:01:13.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01856 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7NyEY4BDaO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Tor7oYBf1j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aQQ4pTaE8I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m2Fh7D19uM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.845600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.845600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 80651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec +16.4671 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec 16.4671 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 5197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3489 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 80651 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 89 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.8 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.7NyEY4BDaO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=6242, bad_region=13891, passed=86324
Got 86324 stars (including 66886 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5332)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1602 n_q2=612 n_q3=1848 n_q4=786 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4848 N_valid=4848 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.018 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.009 median_sep_arcsec=0.248 p95_sep_arcsec=1.203 n_q1=1602 n_q2=612 n_q3=1848 n_q4=786 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Tor7oYBf1j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=5759, bad_region=13221, passed=80633
Got 80633 stars (including 62313 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5329)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1583 n_q2=633 n_q3=1821 n_q4=807 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4844 N_valid=4844 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.018 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.280 p95_sep_arcsec=1.124 n_q1=1583 n_q2=633 n_q3=1821 n_q4=807 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aQQ4pTaE8I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=4063, bad_region=15942, passed=65750
Got 65750 stars (including 47183 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65750 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53634 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=8.100 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.960 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.960 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.517 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.824 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.824 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.386 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.497 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.497 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=1.120 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.405 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.386 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.537 worst_region_rms_after=0.497 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.224 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.497
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.537 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.537 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.405 arcsec matched=4871
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.449 n_q1=1450 n_q2=1117 n_q3=1468 n_q4=836 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4871 N_valid=4871 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.571 bias_dec_arcsec=0.685 median_sep_arcsec=1.022 p95_sep_arcsec=1.982 n_q1=1450 n_q2=1117 n_q3=1468 n_q4=836 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.m2Fh7D19uM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=4032, bad_region=16165, passed=66349
Got 66349 stars (including 47573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54001 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54001 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54001 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5358)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=8.089 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.884 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.884 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.533 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.911 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.911 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.398 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.495 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.495 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=1.147 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.413 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.398 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.535 worst_region_rms_after=0.495 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.216 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.495
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.535 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.535 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.413 arcsec matched=4871
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.485 n_q1=1457 n_q2=1114 n_q3=1472 n_q4=828 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4871 N_valid=4871 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.608 bias_dec_arcsec=0.685 median_sep_arcsec=1.054 p95_sep_arcsec=2.055 n_q1=1457 n_q2=1114 n_q3=1472 n_q4=828 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_02-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_031559_TTUQ2b1x1_2273532_IUkqYR8M/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:52.94 +18:38:38.0: 14.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:51.23 +19:57:33.0: 15.27 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:36.91 +23:07:52.7: 14.87 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:46.80 +18:56:55.3: 14.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:00.32 +21:12:08.3: 14.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:58.46 +18:06:42.7: 14.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:41.41 +25:10:25.5: 15.03 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:35.82 +22:48:22.0: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:38.34 +25:24:25.4: 14.95 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:26.69 +24:33:35.4: 15.03 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:46.80 +18:56:55.3: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:52.94 +18:38:38.0: 14.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:58.46 +18:06:42.7: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:51.23 +19:57:33.0: 15.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:41.41 +25:10:25.5: 14.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:00.32 +21:12:08.3: 14.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:35.82 +22:48:22.0: 14.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:36.91 +23:07:52.7: 14.82 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:26.69 +24:33:35.4: 15.67 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:38.34 +25:24:25.4: 15.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:46.80 +18:56:55.3: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1936 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:58.46 +18:06:42.7: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5563 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:52.94 +18:38:38.0: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5806 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:00.32 +21:12:08.3: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.7829 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:35.82 +22:48:22.0: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0680 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:41.41 +25:10:25.5: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9584 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:51.23 +19:57:33.0: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0493 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:36.91 +23:07:52.7: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7472 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:26.69 +24:33:35.4: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1282 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:38.34 +25:24:25.4: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9809 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:12.11 +19:12:46.8: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:41.48 +23:57:26.8: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:01.39 +18:20:44.6: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:17.56 +20:33:29.0: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:43:39.18 +18:06:40.5: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:13.51 +21:18:39.3: 13.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:32:04.59 +26:05:33.1: 16.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:41.48 +23:57:26.8: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:41.48 +23:57:26.8: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6208 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:01.39 +18:20:44.6: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:12.11 +19:12:46.8: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:12.11 +19:12:46.8: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1778 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:01.39 +18:20:44.6: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9850 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:43:39.18 +18:06:40.5: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:13.51 +21:18:39.3: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:17.56 +20:33:29.0: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:39.18 +18:06:40.5: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0842 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:13.51 +21:18:39.3: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=14.0458 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:17.56 +20:33:29.0: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7964 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:56.36 +25:58:39.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:32:04.59 +26:05:33.1: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:22.17 +22:58:04.2: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:56.36 +25:58:39.7: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:47.25 +22:58:08.4: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:49:26.99 +23:15:08.5: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:17.84 +24:00:00.3: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:22.17 +22:58:04.2: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:11.05 +23:04:44.7: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:22.17 +22:58:04.2: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4548 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:19.86 +20:42:08.9: 13.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:54.32 +26:03:37.8: 14.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:19.75 +20:10:11.6: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:49:26.99 +23:15:08.5: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:47.25 +22:58:08.4: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:47.25 +22:58:08.4: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8868 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:26.99 +23:15:08.5: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9906 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:17.84 +24:00:00.3: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:17.84 +24:00:00.3: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0673 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:11.05 +23:04:44.7: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:11.05 +23:04:44.7: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1023 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:54.32 +26:03:37.8: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:19.86 +20:42:08.9: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:54.32 +26:03:37.8: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1720 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:19.86 +20:42:08.9: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1274 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:19.75 +20:10:11.6: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:19.75 +20:10:11.6: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1066 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:02.05 +24:08:01.6: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:27:17.74 +23:02:02.9: 14.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:45.33 +19:20:17.5: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:14.52 +21:43:08.4: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:26.72 +18:49:53.9: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:02.05 +24:08:01.6: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:02.05 +24:08:01.6: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1478 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:45.33 +19:20:17.5: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:45.33 +19:20:17.5: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2546 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:27:17.74 +23:02:02.9: 14.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:17.74 +23:02:02.9: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3640 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:01.19 +19:10:16.8: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:45.47 +19:58:01.5: 14.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:14.52 +21:43:08.4: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:26.72 +18:49:53.9: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:26.72 +18:49:53.9: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3940 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:14.70 +20:33:18.7: 14.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:45.47 +19:58:01.5: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:45.47 +19:58:01.5: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5143 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:01.19 +19:10:16.8: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:01.19 +19:10:16.8: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5128 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:48.32 +19:42:38.8: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:14.70 +20:33:18.7: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:38.95 +23:50:47.6: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:14.70 +20:33:18.7: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3955 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:03.53 +17:44:04.8: 14.58 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:55.47 +23:59:02.2: 14.56 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:48.32 +19:42:38.8: 14.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:03.53 +20:28:28.8: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:48.32 +19:42:38.8: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3915 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:25.27 +17:51:20.9: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:38.95 +23:50:47.6: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:03.53 +17:44:04.8: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:03.53 +17:44:04.8: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6022 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:55.47 +23:59:02.2: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:55.47 +23:59:02.2: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6192 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:07.40 +21:24:52.9: 14.60 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:03.53 +20:28:28.8: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:25.27 +17:51:20.9: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:25.27 +17:51:20.9: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5668 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:03.42 +21:28:22.0: 14.87 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:07.40 +21:24:52.9: 14.64 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:07.40 +21:24:52.9: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.8024 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:09.77 +22:35:00.4: 14.65 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:20.91 +22:55:30.0: 14.80 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:03.42 +21:28:22.0: 14.70 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:03.42 +21:28:22.0: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7835 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:30.42 +20:35:37.0: 15.27 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:09.77 +22:35:00.4: 14.54 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:09.77 +22:35:00.4: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7116 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:20.91 +22:55:30.0: 14.73 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:20.91 +22:55:30.0: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.8254 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:54.98 +21:36:58.6: 15.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:30.42 +20:35:37.0: 15.29 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:30.42 +20:35:37.0: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8584 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:33.47 +21:34:14.2: 14.95 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:54.98 +21:36:58.6: 15.05 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:54.98 +21:36:58.6: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9134 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:21:43.28 +18:09:18.3: 15.52 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:36.87 +21:08:34.0: 15.23 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:45.09 +23:20:18.1: 15.45 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:33.47 +21:34:14.2: 15.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:21:43.28 +18:09:18.3: 15.69 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:33.47 +21:34:14.2: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9721 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.58 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:43.28 +18:09:18.3: ref_mag=15.58 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0634 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:36.87 +21:08:34.0: 15.02 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:36.87 +21:08:34.0: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9136 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:47.43 +23:56:57.3: 15.49 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:45.09 +23:20:18.1: 15.16 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:45.09 +23:20:18.1: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1070 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:47.43 +23:56:57.3: 15.18 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:47.43 +23:56:57.3: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9263 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:00.72 +19:12:12.9: 15.38 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:08.63 +20:39:42.5: 15.20 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:36:40.05 +19:27:50.0: 15.19 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:26.82 +22:32:59.2: 15.24 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:00.72 +19:12:12.9: 15.38 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:00.72 +19:12:12.9: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0240 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:08.63 +20:39:42.5: 14.97 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:08.63 +20:39:42.5: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1262 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:36:40.05 +19:27:50.0: 15.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:46.27 +21:09:05.7: 15.69 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:40.05 +19:27:50.0: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0820 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:26.82 +22:32:59.2: 15.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:26.82 +22:32:59.2: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1978 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:46.27 +21:09:05.7: 15.64 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.67 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:46.27 +21:09:05.7: ref_mag=15.67 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=15.1154 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:19:03.27 +24:54:36.0: 15.41 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:48.12 +21:29:30.9: 15.31 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:05.66 +19:44:09.8: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:41:05.00 +21:36:49.8: 15.55 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:19:03.27 +24:54:36.0: 15.28 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:03.27 +24:54:36.0: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.2397 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:48.12 +21:29:30.9: 15.34 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:48.12 +21:29:30.9: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1151 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:05.66 +19:44:09.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:05.29 +21:33:49.8: 15.31 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:41:05.00 +21:36:49.8: 15.55 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:05.00 +21:36:49.8: ref_mag=15.55 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1528 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:05.29 +21:33:49.8: 15.30 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:05.29 +21:33:49.8: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1753 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:43.95 +23:37:12.7: 15.34 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:13.35 +22:52:34.6: 15.26 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:46.76 +20:22:18.8: 14.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:43.95 +23:37:12.7: 15.62 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:43.95 +23:37:12.7: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.2527 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:13.35 +22:52:34.6: 15.10 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:13.35 +22:52:34.6: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1176 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:46.76 +20:22:18.8: 14.84 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:42.85 +23:32:17.2: 15.55 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:46.76 +20:22:18.8: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=15.1506 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:42.85 +23:32:17.2: 15.59 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:42.85 +23:32:17.2: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.3455 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103153.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103848.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out107681.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out109131.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out109312.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112106.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100441_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100441_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100443_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100443_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100450_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100450_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100456_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100456_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100459_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100459_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100466_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100466_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100467_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100467_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100469_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100469_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100470_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100470_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100480_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100480_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100483_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100483_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:02.10 +24:43:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100484_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100484_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100487_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100487_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100489_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100489_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100491_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100491_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:44.35 +25:22:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100495_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100495_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100497_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100497_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100498_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100498_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100970_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 100970_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:25.26 +17:54:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101182_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 101182_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.71 +19:10:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102198_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 102198_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:45.30 +19:28:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103153_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 103153_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103271_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 103271_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:38.36 +22:42:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103721_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 103721_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:24.69 +22:56:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103784_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 103784_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:45.23 +19:58:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103848_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 103848_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104247_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 104247_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:07.87 +21:31:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104367_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 104367_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104901_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 104901_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:30.12 +21:45:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104987_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 104987_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:25.52 +18:42:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105068_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 105068_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:16.58 +21:52:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105275_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 105275_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:14.40 +24:06:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105738_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 105738_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105786_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 105786_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:38.54 +17:55:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106325_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 106325_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106536_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 106536_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106722_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 106722_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106774_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 106774_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106802_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 106802_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106910_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 106910_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106921_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 106921_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:59.01 +20:19:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106978_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 106978_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107128_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 107128_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:37.47 +21:31:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107491_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 107491_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107534_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 107534_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107681_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 107681_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108199_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 108199_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:26.52 +23:36:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108377_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 108377_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108547_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 108547_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:28.46 +23:36:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108783_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 108783_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:59.22 +18:07:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108831_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 108831_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108880_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 108880_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108883_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 108883_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:40.54 +21:44:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108949_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 108949_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108968_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 108968_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:13.83 +23:20:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108973_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 108973_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:28.78 +20:33:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108982_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 108982_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109131_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 109131_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109134_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 109134_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109150_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 109150_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109312_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 109312_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109709_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 109709_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109721_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 109721_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109928_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 109928_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110043_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 110043_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110386_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 110386_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110411_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 110411_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110644_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 110644_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110803_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 110803_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110992_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 110992_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111019_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 111019_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111177_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 111177_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111224_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 111224_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111564_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 111564_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111570_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 111570_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:49.11 +22:53:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111603_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 111603_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111621_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 111621_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111748_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 111748_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112048_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 112048_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112053_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 112053_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112057_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 112057_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112106_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 112106_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112109_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 112109_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112154_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 112154_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112190_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 112190_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112246_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 112246_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112263_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 112263_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112287_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 112287_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_03-00-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
