This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.2578 2461334.7578 10.86 01:58:26.37 -12:39:50.3
173.54093 -68.66348 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.532 Herculina -0 -1 1 10.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:58:26.37 -12:39:50.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:58:26.37 -12:39:50.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.2578* 01 58 26.37 -12 39 50.3 10.9 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.7578,10.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.2578 10.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.2578 2461334.7578 11.94 02:00:30.82 -07:18:24.3
165.66645 -64.28459 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.360 Carlova -0 -0 0 12.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:00:30.82 -07:18:24.3: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:00:30.82 -07:18:24.3: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.2578* 02 00 30.82 -07 18 24.3 11.9 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.7578,11.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.2578 11.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.2578 2461334.7578 12.52 01:18:08.64 -14:08:15.5
149.87718 -75.59332 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.166 Rhodope -0 -0 0 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:18:08.64 -14:08:15.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:18:08.64 -14:08:15.5: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.2578* 01 18 08.64 -14 08 15.5 12.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.7578,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.2578 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.2578 2461334.7578 12.96 02:07:12.73 -08:07:29.4
169.79055 -63.86780 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1093 Freda -1 0 1 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:07:12.73 -08:07:29.4: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:07:12.73 -08:07:29.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.2578* 02 07 12.73 -08 07 29.4 13.0 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.7578,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.2578 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.2578 2461334.7578 13.71 01:18:11.90 -07:28:05.9
142.04346 -69.34109 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.783 Nora -0 -1 1 13.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:18:11.90 -07:28:05.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:18:11.90 -07:28:05.9: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.2578* 01 18 11.90 -07 28 05.9 13.7 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.7578,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.2578 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.2578 2461334.7578 13.86 01:22:30.09 -04:57:13.9
142.76439 -66.62204 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1689 Floris-Jan 0 0 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:22:30.09 -04:57:13.9: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:22:30.09 -04:57:13.9: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.2578* 01 22 30.09 -04 57 13.9 13.9 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.7578,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.2578 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.2578 2461334.7578 14.07 02:00:33.33 -09:39:58.0
169.23514 -66.10913 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.891 Gunhild -0 0 0 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:00:33.33 -09:39:58.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:00:33.33 -09:39:58.0: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.2578* 02 00 33.33 -09 39 58.0 14.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.7578,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.2578 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.64392579 23.12.2025 03:27:05.188 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
First image: 2461032.64392579 23.12.2025 03:27:05.188 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Last image: 2461334.75805880 21.10.2026 06:11:26.280 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5337
Objects passed selection criteria: 5333
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4896
Average stars matched: 4789.5 (97.8248 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232216 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 01:14:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.64392579 23.12.2025 03:27:05.188 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
First image: 2461032.64392579 23.12.2025 03:27:05.188 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Last image: 2461334.75805880 21.10.2026 06:11:26.280 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 225
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27126
Objects passed selection criteria: 27062
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24071
Average stars matched: 23365.2 (97.068 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 250640 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 01:15:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461334.75759243
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:51.887 -10:01:12.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:43:02.751 -09:59:51.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:42:51.887 -10:01:12.35
Second-epoch image center 01:43:02.751 -09:59:51.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0499 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:43:03.374 -09:59:50.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:42:51.887 -10:01:12.35
Second-epoch image center 01:43:03.374 -09:59:50.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0523 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:43:02.751 -09:59:51.37
Second-epoch second image center 01:43:03.374 -09:59:50.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00257 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uuDeh8L4AP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VtUSJBW2Uo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jr3c82DJms
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yAg4nEsXlo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits and wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits and wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits and wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5413 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.6951 to 33.9052 deg, Dec -15.3338 to -4.6054 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.6951 to 33.9052 deg, Dec -15.3338 to -4.6054 deg
Loaded 4186 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3306 out of 3435 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3435 out of 5413 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5413 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.6951 to 33.9052 deg, Dec -15.3338 to -4.6054 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.6951 to 33.9052 deg, Dec -15.3338 to -4.6054 deg
Loaded 4186 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3306 out of 3435 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3435 out of 5413 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (aperture=5.8)
Read 5432 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.7140 to 33.9201 deg, Dec -15.3337 to -4.6054 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.7140 to 33.9201 deg, Dec -15.3337 to -4.6054 deg
Loaded 4184 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3435 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3435 out of 5432 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
2.0 pix Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
15.4 mag. Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.uuDeh8L4AP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=369, bad_region=0, passed=5413
Got 5413 stars (including 5039 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5413 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.240 n_q1=1185 n_q2=1227 n_q3=1231 n_q4=1250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4893 N_valid=4893 bias_ra_arcsec=0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=0.000 median_sep_arcsec=0.232 p95_sep_arcsec=0.640 n_q1=1185 n_q2=1227 n_q3=1231 n_q4=1250 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits -region wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VtUSJBW2Uo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=371, bad_region=0, passed=5432
Got 5432 stars (including 5057 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5432 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=1186 n_q2=1241 n_q3=1226 n_q4=1237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4890 N_valid=4890 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.234 p95_sep_arcsec=0.651 n_q1=1186 n_q2=1241 n_q3=1226 n_q4=1237 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits -region wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jr3c82DJms (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=295, bad_region=0, passed=4434
Got 4434 stars (including 4135 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4434 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 429 (Dec -15.4 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4059 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4055 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4055 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 429 (Dec -15.4 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4059 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4054 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4054 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4054 stars left (next iteration limit 4460)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4054 robust_rms=13.502 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.064 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.064 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4054 robust_rms=0.465 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.669 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.669 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4054 robust_rms=0.287 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.362 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.362 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4054 robust_rms_before=0.966 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.269 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.287 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.370 worst_region_rms_after=0.362 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.008 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.362
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.370 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.269 arcsec matched=4054
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits N_match=4054 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1044 n_q2=1005 n_q3=985 n_q4=1020 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4054 N_valid=4054 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.446 bias_dec_arcsec=0.582 median_sep_arcsec=0.855 p95_sep_arcsec=1.688 n_q1=1044 n_q2=1005 n_q3=985 n_q4=1020 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.yAg4nEsXlo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=289, bad_region=0, passed=4448
Got 4448 stars (including 4154 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4448 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 429 (Dec -15.4 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4075 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4072 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4072 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4072 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 429 (Dec -15.4 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4076 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4072 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4072 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4072 stars left (next iteration limit 4479)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4072 robust_rms=13.538 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.096 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.096 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4072 robust_rms=0.412 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.723 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.723 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4072 robust_rms=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.365 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.365 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4072 robust_rms_before=0.960 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.279 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.379 worst_region_rms_after=0.365 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.025 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.365
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.379 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.379 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.279 arcsec matched=4072
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits N_match=4072 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1041 n_q2=1012 n_q3=983 n_q4=1036 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4072 N_valid=4072 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.450 bias_dec_arcsec=0.581 median_sep_arcsec=0.881 p95_sep_arcsec=1.609 n_q1=1041 n_q2=1012 n_q3=983 n_q4=1036 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits sigma_overall=0.269 worst_q_ratio=1.279
ref2=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits sigma_overall=0.266 worst_q_ratio=1.256
new1=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.271 worst_q_ratio=1.108
new2=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.111
reference average sigma_overall=0.2675 worst_q_ratio=1.2675
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4054 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203_astrometric_residuals.png (4072 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:58:26.37 -12:39:50.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:52:33.43 -10:55:02.0: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:00:30.82 -07:18:24.3: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:42:46.74 -10:34:39.2: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:42:46.74 -10:34:39.2: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:00:30.82 -07:18:24.3: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:52:33.43 -10:55:02.0: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:58:26.37 -12:39:50.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:42:46.74 -10:34:39.2: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1485 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:52:33.43 -10:55:02.0: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1713 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20276.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20345.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20276_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
Preparing report for the candidate 20276_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20345_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
Preparing report for the candidate 20345_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20361_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 20361_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20367_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 20367_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
01:58:26.37 -12:39:50.3
02:00:30.82 -07:18:24.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:51.887 -10:01:12.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:43:02.751 -09:59:51.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:42:51.887 -10:01:12.35
Second-epoch image center 01:43:02.751 -09:59:51.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0499 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:43:03.374 -09:59:50.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:42:51.887 -10:01:12.35
Second-epoch image center 01:43:03.374 -09:59:50.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0523 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:43:02.751 -09:59:51.37
Second-epoch second image center 01:43:03.374 -09:59:50.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00257 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9reWBBFwbS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sojN7WikMW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wCLNVfUjk7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r0R7hu8RBR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits and wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits and wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits and wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.6948 to 33.9309 deg, Dec -15.3404 to -4.5625 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.6948 to 33.9309 deg, Dec -15.3404 to -4.5625 deg
Loaded 4228 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3275 out of 3520 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3520 out of 28292 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.828500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.828500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.6948 to 33.9309 deg, Dec -15.3404 to -4.5625 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.6948 to 33.9309 deg, Dec -15.3404 to -4.5625 deg
Loaded 4228 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3275 out of 3520 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3520 out of 28292 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 28381 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.6971 to 33.9326 deg, Dec -15.3394 to -4.5622 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.6971 to 33.9326 deg, Dec -15.3394 to -4.5622 deg
Loaded 4228 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3270 out of 3519 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3519 out of 28381 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 206 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
1.9 pix Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
15.6 mag. Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9reWBBFwbS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1018, bad_region=4, passed=28287
Got 28287 stars (including 27224 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28287 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=1255 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1251 n_q4=1190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4895 N_valid=4895 bias_ra_arcsec=0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.229 p95_sep_arcsec=0.635 n_q1=1255 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1251 n_q4=1190 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits -region wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.sojN7WikMW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1046, bad_region=4, passed=28368
Got 28368 stars (including 27282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28368 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.230 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1255 n_q2=1189 n_q3=1250 n_q4=1206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4900 N_valid=4900 bias_ra_arcsec=0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.230 p95_sep_arcsec=0.637 n_q1=1255 n_q2=1189 n_q3=1250 n_q4=1206 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits -region wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wCLNVfUjk7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=629, bad_region=36, passed=20126
Got 20126 stars (including 19438 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20126 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.4 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.4 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=13.415 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.093 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.093 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.475 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.699 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.699 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.297 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.376 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.376 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4885 robust_rms_before=0.975 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.284 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.297 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.384 worst_region_rms_after=0.376 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.007 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.376
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.384 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.384 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.284 arcsec matched=4885
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=1169 n_q2=1192 n_q3=1215 n_q4=1309 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4885 N_valid=4885 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.450 bias_dec_arcsec=0.587 median_sep_arcsec=0.868 p95_sep_arcsec=1.689 n_q1=1169 n_q2=1192 n_q3=1215 n_q4=1309 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.r0R7hu8RBR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=667, bad_region=35, passed=20265
Got 20265 stars (including 19542 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20265 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.4 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20265 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.4 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20265 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20265 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=13.323 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.451 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.451 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.713 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.713 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.301 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.366 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.366 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=0.964 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.301 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.371 worst_region_rms_after=0.366 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.008 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.366
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.371 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.371 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.290 arcsec matched=4881
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1172 n_q2=1185 n_q3=1222 n_q4=1302 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4881 N_valid=4881 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.448 bias_dec_arcsec=0.582 median_sep_arcsec=0.879 p95_sep_arcsec=1.614 n_q1=1172 n_q2=1185 n_q3=1222 n_q4=1302 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-10-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_011212_TTUQ1b1x1_3622650_K6dmdUTx/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:18:08.64 -14:08:15.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:07:12.73 -08:07:29.4: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:18:08.64 -14:08:15.5: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:52:45.52 -12:42:23.8: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:07:12.73 -08:07:29.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:52:45.52 -12:42:23.8: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:52:45.52 -12:42:23.8: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0278 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:18:11.90 -07:28:05.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:50:03.56 -06:42:22.1: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:33:41.56 -09:22:39.6: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:22:30.09 -04:57:13.9: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:18:11.90 -07:28:05.9: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:50:03.56 -06:42:22.1: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:50:03.56 -06:42:22.1: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6691 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:33:41.56 -09:22:39.6: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:33:41.56 -09:22:39.6: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7348 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:22:30.09 -04:57:13.9: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:00:33.33 -09:39:58.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:00:33.33 -09:39:58.0: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:36:19.15 -08:51:38.9: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:36:19.15 -08:51:38.9: 14.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:36:19.15 -08:51:38.9: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4329 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32058.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32158.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32318.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32341.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32478.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31904_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 31904_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31905_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 31905_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31910_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 31910_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:58:26.37 -12:39:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31922_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 31922_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31954_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 31954_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31973_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 31973_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:00:30.83 -07:18:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31985_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 31985_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31990_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 31990_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31998_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 31998_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32006_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32006_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32012_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32012_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32013_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32013_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32022_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32022_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32027_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32027_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32038_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32038_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32052_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32052_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32058_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
Preparing report for the candidate 32058_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32059_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32059_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32067_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32067_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32068_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32068_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32072_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32072_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32097_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32097_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32098_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32098_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32102_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32102_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32105_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32105_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32111_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32111_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32115_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32115_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32116_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32116_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32117_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32117_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32121_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32121_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32124_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32124_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32130_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32130_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:31:51.33 -04:57:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32139_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32139_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32141_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32141_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32152_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32152_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32156_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32156_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32157_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32157_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32158_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
Preparing report for the candidate 32158_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32162_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32162_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32166_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32166_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32167_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32167_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32175_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32175_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32176_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32176_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32177_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32177_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32183_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32183_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32185_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32185_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32189_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32189_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32196_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32196_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32201_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32201_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32210_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32210_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32211_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32211_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32214_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32214_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32215_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32215_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32218_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32218_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32222_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32222_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32224_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32224_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32226_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32226_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32227_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32227_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32230_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32230_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32238_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32238_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32241_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32241_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32242_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32242_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32251_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32251_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32254_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32254_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32256_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32256_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32257_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32257_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32259_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32259_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32264_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32264_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32277_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32277_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32281_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32281_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32282_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32282_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32286_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32286_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32290_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32290_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32294_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32294_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32301_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32301_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32306_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32306_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32317_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32317_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32318_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
Preparing report for the candidate 32318_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32319_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32319_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32320_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32320_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32321_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32321_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:54:26.03 -11:51:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32323_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32323_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32325_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32325_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32329_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32329_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32330_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32330_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32334_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32334_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32335_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32335_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32338_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32338_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32340_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32340_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32341_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
Preparing report for the candidate 32341_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32343_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32343_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32347_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32347_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32348_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32348_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32349_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32349_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32350_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32350_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:23:53.99 -05:48:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32353_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32353_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32356_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32356_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32367_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32367_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32369_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32369_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32385_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32385_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32395_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32395_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32396_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32396_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32398_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32398_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32399_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32399_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32408_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32408_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32413_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32413_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32416_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32416_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32419_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32419_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32422_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32422_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32428_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32428_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32430_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32430_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32432_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32432_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32433_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32433_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32439_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32439_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32442_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32442_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32443_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32443_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32445_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32445_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32455_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32455_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32459_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32459_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32465_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32465_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32467_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32467_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32472_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32472_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32475_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32475_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32476_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32476_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32478_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
Preparing report for the candidate 32478_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32480_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32480_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32481_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32481_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32482_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32482_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32483_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32483_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32487_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32487_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32492_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32492_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32502_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32502_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32507_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32507_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32510_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32510_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32511_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32511_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32513_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32513_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32518_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32518_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32520_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32520_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32521_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32521_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32522_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32522_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32523_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32523_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32530_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32530_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32531_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32531_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32532_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32532_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32534_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32534_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32536_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32536_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32537_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32537_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32538_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32538_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32544_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32544_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32548_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32548_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32552_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32552_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32555_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32555_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32557_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32557_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32559_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32559_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32560_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32560_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32564_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32564_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:13.28 -09:57:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32568_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32568_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32570_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32570_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32571_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32571_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32575_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32575_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32576_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32576_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32578_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32578_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32580_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32580_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32581_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32581_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32583_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32583_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32587_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32587_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32591_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32591_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32594_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32594_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32595_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32595_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32596_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32596_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32598_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32598_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32601_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32601_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32602_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32602_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32604_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32604_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32605_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32605_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32606_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32606_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32609_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32609_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32611_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32611_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32614_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32614_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32619_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32619_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32623_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32623_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32624_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32624_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32628_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32628_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32630_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32630_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32633_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32633_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32635_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32635_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32637_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32637_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32638_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32638_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32641_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32641_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32643_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32643_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32645_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32645_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32649_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32649_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32651_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32651_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32654_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32654_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32655_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32655_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32657_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32657_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32658_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32658_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32662_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32662_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32663_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32663_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32664_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32664_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32665_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32665_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32666_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32666_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32667_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32667_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32673_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32673_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32677_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 32677_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15775_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 15775_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-11-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
