This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.2260 2461334.7260 11.69 23:03:34.30 -05:12:26.2
68.58560 -56.23579 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.236 Honoria -0 -0 0 11.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:03:34.30 -05:12:26.2: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:03:34.30 -05:12:26.2: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.7260,11.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.2260 11.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.2260 2461334.7260 12.93 23:24:46.23 -05:41:22.2
75.15920 -60.25448 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.317 Roxane -0 -0 0 12.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:24:46.23 -05:41:22.2: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:24:46.23 -05:41:22.2: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.7260,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.2260 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.2260 2461334.7260 12.90 22:56:02.09 +01:53:57.9
74.56454 -49.81637 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.338 Budrosa -1 -0 1 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:56:02.09 +01:53:57.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:56:02.09 +01:53:57.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.7260,12.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.2260 12.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.2260 2461334.7260 13.72 23:10:50.32 -01:57:40.4
74.90367 -55.15996 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.328 Gudrun -0 0 0 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:10:50.32 -01:57:40.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:10:50.32 -01:57:40.4: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.7260,13.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.2260 13.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.2260 2461334.7260 13.81 23:14:22.15 -03:02:38.1
74.80130 -56.55511 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.570 Kythera -0 -1 1 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:14:22.15 -03:02:38.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:14:22.15 -03:02:38.1: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.7260,13.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.2260 13.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.2260 2461334.7260 13.81 23:10:32.13 -05:18:47.1
70.66059 -57.55213 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.788 Hohensteina -1 -0 1 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:10:32.13 -05:18:47.1: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:10:32.13 -05:18:47.1: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.7260,13.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.2260 13.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.2260 2461334.7260 14.23 23:13:08.44 +02:00:08.8
79.92100 -52.46187 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1353 Maartje -1 0 1 14.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:13:08.44 +02:00:08.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:13:08.44 +02:00:08.8: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.7260,14.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.2260 14.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.2260 2461334.7260 14.62 23:08:17.93 -02:20:55.5
73.62642 -55.02375 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.673 Edda -1 -1 1 14.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:08:17.93 -02:20:55.5: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:08:17.93 -02:20:55.5: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.7260,14.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.2260 14.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461334.72626574 21.10.2026 05:25:39.360 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6052
Objects passed selection criteria: 6037
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5171
Average stars matched: 5058 (97.8147 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232560 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 00:32:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461334.72626574 21.10.2026 05:25:39.360 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 129
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33886
Objects passed selection criteria: 33807
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30846.8
Average stars matched: 29775.5 (96.5272 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 256848 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 00:33:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461334.72576089
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:51.586 -01:56:29.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:51.586 -01:56:29.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0970 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:53.450 -01:56:28.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:53.450 -01:56:28.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1029 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:51.586 -01:56:29.13
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:53.450 -01:56:28.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00776 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C1ipOcYHt4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mwhxSl9X15
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MR0iNxt1Io
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a5zGYXr24f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.655300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.655300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to +3.2517 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to 3.2517 deg
Loaded 4385 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3695 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
2.2 pix Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.C1ipOcYHt4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, bad_region=0, passed=6415
Got 6415 stars (including 6023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4755 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4755 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4745 stars left (next iteration limit 5219)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits N_match=4745 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=1208 n_q2=1128 n_q3=1149 n_q4=1260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4745 N_valid=4745 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.015 bias_dec_arcsec=0.013 median_sep_arcsec=0.270 p95_sep_arcsec=1.315 n_q1=1208 n_q2=1128 n_q3=1149 n_q4=1260 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mwhxSl9X15 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, bad_region=0, passed=6260
Got 6260 stars (including 5889 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4749 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4739 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4749 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4739 stars left (next iteration limit 5212)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits N_match=4739 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=1216 n_q2=1124 n_q3=1135 n_q4=1264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.122
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4739 N_valid=4739 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.016 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.315 p95_sep_arcsec=1.200 n_q1=1216 n_q2=1124 n_q3=1135 n_q4=1264 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MR0iNxt1Io (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=355, bad_region=0, passed=4109
Got 4109 stars (including 3746 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4109 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.5 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3535 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3530 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3530 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.5 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3535 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3530 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3530 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 3530 stars left (next iteration limit 3883)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3530 robust_rms=13.867 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.264 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.264 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3530 robust_rms=0.507 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.634 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.634 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3530 robust_rms=0.297 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.349 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.283 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3530 robust_rms_before=0.976 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.307 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.297 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.359 worst_region_rms_after=0.349 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.937 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.283
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.359 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.359 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.307 arcsec matched=3530
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits N_match=3530 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=849 n_q2=797 n_q3=938 n_q4=946 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.182
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3530 N_valid=3530 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.462 bias_dec_arcsec=0.523 median_sep_arcsec=0.858 p95_sep_arcsec=1.856 n_q1=849 n_q2=797 n_q3=938 n_q4=946 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.a5zGYXr24f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=338, bad_region=0, passed=4083
Got 4083 stars (including 3737 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4083 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.5 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3530 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3526 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3526 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.5 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3531 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3526 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3526 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 3526 stars left (next iteration limit 3878)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3526 robust_rms=13.876 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.434 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.434 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3526 robust_rms=0.509 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.710 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.710 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3526 robust_rms=0.294 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.352 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.276 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3526 robust_rms_before=0.988 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.313 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.294 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.381 worst_region_rms_after=0.352 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.953 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.276
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.381 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.381 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.313 arcsec matched=3526
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits N_match=3526 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=865 n_q2=799 n_q3=926 n_q4=936 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3526 N_valid=3526 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.468 bias_dec_arcsec=0.523 median_sep_arcsec=0.875 p95_sep_arcsec=1.848 n_q1=865 n_q2=799 n_q3=926 n_q4=936 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits sigma_overall=0.332 worst_q_ratio=1.133
ref2=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.122
new1=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.182
new2=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.257
reference average sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.1275
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017_astrometric_residuals.png (4745 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018_astrometric_residuals.png (4739 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160_astrometric_residuals.png (3530 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (3526 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:03:34.30 -05:12:26.2: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:03:34.30 -05:12:26.2: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20423.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20303_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20303_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:38:58.96 +01:01:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20423_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
Preparing report for the candidate 20423_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:03:34.30 -05:12:26.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:51.586 -01:56:29.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:51.586 -01:56:29.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0970 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:53.450 -01:56:28.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:53.450 -01:56:28.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1029 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:51.586 -01:56:29.13
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:53.450 -01:56:28.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00776 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qIuQOz8vJi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bHx8WUcMi3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hJe9QIfYyA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LJrN6E16lx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 35879 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to +3.2602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to 3.2602 deg
Loaded 4394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3893 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3893 out of 35879 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.548500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.548500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 35879 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to +3.2602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to 3.2602 deg
Loaded 4394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3893 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3893 out of 35879 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 36137 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2724 to 355.0227 deg, Dec -7.2779 to +3.2557 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2724 to 355.0227 deg, Dec -7.2779 to 3.2557 deg
Loaded 4393 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3594 out of 3890 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3890 out of 36137 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 115 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
2.1 pix Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
2.0 pix fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
2.0 pix fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
15.5 mag. Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qIuQOz8vJi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=1717, bad_region=0, passed=35846
Got 35846 stars (including 34084 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35846 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4756 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4756 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4745 stars left (next iteration limit 5219)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits N_match=4745 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1197 n_q2=1146 n_q3=1142 n_q4=1260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4745 N_valid=4745 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.020 bias_dec_arcsec=0.016 median_sep_arcsec=0.267 p95_sep_arcsec=1.288 n_q1=1197 n_q2=1146 n_q3=1142 n_q4=1260 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bHx8WUcMi3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=8, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1465, bad_region=0, passed=36108
Got 36108 stars (including 34588 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36108 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4752 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4746 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4746 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4752 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4746 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4746 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4746 stars left (next iteration limit 5220)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits N_match=4746 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1208 n_q2=1137 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4746 N_valid=4746 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.025 bias_dec_arcsec=0.012 median_sep_arcsec=0.313 p95_sep_arcsec=1.172 n_q1=1208 n_q2=1137 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1270 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hJe9QIfYyA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=790, bad_region=23, passed=26289
Got 26289 stars (including 25429 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26289 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.5 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4746 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.5 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4747 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4738 stars left (next iteration limit 5211)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4738 robust_rms=13.287 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.843 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.843 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4738 robust_rms=0.510 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.728 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.728 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4738 robust_rms=0.308 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.352 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.297 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4738 robust_rms_before=1.002 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.314 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.308 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.364 worst_region_rms_after=0.352 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.954 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.297
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.364 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.314 arcsec matched=4738
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits N_match=4738 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1245 n_q2=1113 n_q3=1184 n_q4=1196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4738 N_valid=4738 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.486 bias_dec_arcsec=0.552 median_sep_arcsec=0.883 p95_sep_arcsec=1.841 n_q1=1245 n_q2=1113 n_q3=1184 n_q4=1196 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LJrN6E16lx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=789, bad_region=23, passed=26265
Got 26265 stars (including 25396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26265 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.5 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4751 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26265 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.5 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4751 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26265 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26265 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4741 stars left (next iteration limit 5215)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=13.363 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.446 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.446 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=0.513 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.780 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.780 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=0.305 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.347 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.300 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4741 robust_rms_before=1.015 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.310 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.305 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.353 worst_region_rms_after=0.347 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.980 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.300
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.353 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.353 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.310 arcsec matched=4741
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits N_match=4741 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1240 n_q2=1121 n_q3=1190 n_q4=1190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.200
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4741 N_valid=4741 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.488 bias_dec_arcsec=0.555 median_sep_arcsec=0.902 p95_sep_arcsec=1.819 n_q1=1240 n_q2=1121 n_q3=1190 n_q4=1190 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-24-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_002947_TTUQ1b1x1_945295_pZcNJZ5F/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:00:12.88 +02:15:07.8: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:39:23.33 -00:14:30.5: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:58:12.83 +01:23:41.6: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:42.52 +02:49:23.1: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:14:52.07 -01:03:12.0: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:39:23.33 -00:14:30.5: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:58:12.83 +01:23:41.6: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:42.52 +02:49:23.1: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:00:12.88 +02:15:07.8: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:39:23.33 -00:14:30.5: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3586 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:58:12.83 +01:23:41.6: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2564 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:42.52 +02:49:23.1: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8148 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:00:12.88 +02:15:07.8: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8713 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:24:46.23 -05:41:22.2: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:14:52.07 -01:03:12.0: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:42:10.93 -03:28:57.0: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:14:52.07 -01:03:12.0: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6508 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:56:02.09 +01:53:57.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:26:38.10 -05:12:46.5: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:39.37 +01:52:39.0: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:24:46.23 -05:41:22.2: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:42:10.93 -03:28:57.0: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:56:02.09 +01:53:57.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:42:10.93 -03:28:57.0: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8318 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:17:24.02 +00:13:44.6: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:26:38.10 -05:12:46.5: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:39.37 +01:52:39.0: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:26:38.10 -05:12:46.5: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0753 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:39.37 +01:52:39.0: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0923 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:17:24.02 +00:13:44.6: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:17:24.02 +00:13:44.6: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0882 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:57:53.66 -05:31:20.0: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:14:22.15 -03:02:38.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:10:50.32 -01:57:40.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:12:02.21 -02:08:10.1: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:57:53.66 -05:31:20.0: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:57:53.66 -05:31:20.0: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5998 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:10:32.13 -05:18:47.1: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:14:22.15 -03:02:38.1: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:10:50.32 -01:57:40.4: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:12:02.21 -02:08:10.1: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:12:02.21 -02:08:10.1: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8277 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:10:32.13 -05:18:47.1: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:06.34 +00:02:55.5: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:06.34 +00:02:55.5: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:21:24.73 -03:02:53.6: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:06.34 +00:02:55.5: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0308 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:21:24.73 -03:02:53.6: 13.78 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:24.73 -03:02:53.6: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9426 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:13:08.44 +02:00:08.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:31.61 -03:41:17.8: 14.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:45.67 -00:31:11.5: 14.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:08:17.93 -02:20:55.5: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:13:08.44 +02:00:08.8: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:31.61 -03:41:17.8: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:31.61 -03:41:17.8: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6891 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:08:17.93 -02:20:55.5: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:45.67 -00:31:11.5: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:45.67 -00:31:11.5: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6316 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53486.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53496.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53740.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53742.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53787.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53960.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54056.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53185_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53185_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53187_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53187_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53188_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53188_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53190_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53190_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53193_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53193_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:38:58.94 +01:01:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53250_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53250_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53251_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53251_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53264_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53264_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53316_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53316_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:03:34.30 -05:12:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53323_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53323_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53344_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53344_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53349_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53349_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53350_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53350_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53381_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53381_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53382_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53382_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53396_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53396_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53397_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53397_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53412_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53412_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53413_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53413_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53429_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53429_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53433_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53433_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:29:32.39 -01:46:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53437_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53437_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53443_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53443_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53458_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53458_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53464_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53464_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53475_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53475_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53481_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53481_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53485_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53485_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53486_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
Preparing report for the candidate 53486_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53490_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53490_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53491_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53491_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53496_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
Preparing report for the candidate 53496_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53498_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53498_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53501_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53501_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53505_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53505_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53507_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53507_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53511_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53511_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53517_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53517_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53518_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53518_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53524_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53524_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53526_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53526_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53528_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53528_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53532_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53532_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53537_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53537_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53542_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53542_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53552_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53552_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53556_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53556_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53560_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53560_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53565_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53565_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53568_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53568_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53570_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53570_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53575_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53575_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:13:21.36 +02:39:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53587_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53587_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53588_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53588_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53602_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53602_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53618_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53618_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53625_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53625_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53627_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53627_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53650_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53650_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53655_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53655_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53656_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53656_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53675_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53675_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53676_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53676_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53697_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53697_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53707_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53707_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53716_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53716_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53717_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53717_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53729_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53729_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53734_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53734_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53740_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
Preparing report for the candidate 53740_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53742_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
Preparing report for the candidate 53742_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53743_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53743_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53747_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53747_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53748_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53748_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53751_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53751_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53755_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53755_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53774_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53774_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53787_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
Preparing report for the candidate 53787_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53788_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53788_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53789_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53789_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53791_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53791_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53792_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53792_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53797_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53797_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53813_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53813_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53815_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53815_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53822_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53822_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53825_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53825_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53829_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53829_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53839_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53839_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53842_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53842_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53848_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53848_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53852_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53852_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53855_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53855_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53856_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53856_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53858_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53858_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53860_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53860_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53871_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53871_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53884_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53884_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53891_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53891_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53918_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53918_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53924_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53924_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53925_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53925_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53929_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53929_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53936_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53936_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53950_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53950_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53954_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53954_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53960_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
Preparing report for the candidate 53960_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53975_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53975_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54005_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 54005_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54015_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 54015_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54018_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 54018_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54033_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 54033_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54046_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 54046_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54052_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 54052_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_00-25-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
