This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.1635 2461334.6635 13.25 20:36:03.48 -02:28:26.5
43.19622 -24.30699 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.397 Vienna 0 -1 1 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:36:03.48 -02:28:26.5: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:36:03.48 -02:28:26.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.6635,13.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.1635 13.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.1635 2461334.6635 13.65 20:29:54.60 -03:46:31.9
41.14504 -23.57570 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.478 Tergeste 1 0 1 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:29:54.60 -03:46:31.9: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:29:54.60 -03:46:31.9: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.6635,13.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.1635 13.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
First image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Last image: 2461334.66377411 21.10.2026 03:55:40.083 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.44
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13029
Objects passed selection criteria: 12965
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9350
Average stars matched: 8723 (93.2941 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 238452 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 20 23:38:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
First image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Last image: 2461334.66377411 21.10.2026 03:55:40.083 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 107
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.09
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 43 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 100354
Objects passed selection criteria: 100065
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 76119
Average stars matched: 70710.5 (92.8947 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 551352 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 20 23:40:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461334.66330082
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:19.239 -01:59:24.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89
Second-epoch image center 20:34:19.239 -01:59:24.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0249 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:20.532 -01:59:05.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89
Second-epoch image center 20:34:20.532 -01:59:05.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0320 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:19.239 -01:59:24.54
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:20.532 -01:59:05.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00749 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4duJfZxvXJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aCGHe3PfRC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dRi65ZBYTZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bvsMjX83Ci
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 15674 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7155 to 316.4598 deg, Dec -7.2812 to +3.2569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7155 to 316.4598 deg, Dec -7.2812 to 3.2569 deg
Loaded 10827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8886 out of 9374 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9374 out of 15674 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.694350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.694350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.44
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 15674 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7155 to 316.4598 deg, Dec -7.2812 to +3.2569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7155 to 316.4598 deg, Dec -7.2812 to 3.2569 deg
Loaded 10827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8886 out of 9374 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9374 out of 15674 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 15695 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7031 to 316.4361 deg, Dec -7.2626 to +3.2706 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7031 to 316.4361 deg, Dec -7.2626 to 3.2706 deg
Loaded 10818 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8911 out of 9375 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9375 out of 15695 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
15.3 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.4duJfZxvXJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1089, bad_region=3208, passed=15674
Got 15674 stars (including 11577 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15674 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=1531 n_q2=830 n_q3=1646 n_q4=859 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4866 N_valid=4866 bias_ra_arcsec=0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.309 p95_sep_arcsec=1.294 n_q1=1531 n_q2=830 n_q3=1646 n_q4=859 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aCGHe3PfRC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1034, bad_region=3247, passed=15695
Got 15695 stars (including 11591 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15695 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.409 n_q1=1520 n_q2=826 n_q3=1643 n_q4=871 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4860 N_valid=4860 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.011 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.323 p95_sep_arcsec=1.237 n_q1=1520 n_q2=826 n_q3=1643 n_q4=871 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dRi65ZBYTZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=611, bad_region=1965, passed=8365
Got 8365 stars (including 5880 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8365 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4830 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4830 stars left (next iteration limit 5313)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=7.794 arcsec worst_region_rms=17.847 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=17.847 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=0.463 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.788 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.788 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=0.367 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.495 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.495 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4830 robust_rms_before=0.666 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.389 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.367 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.542 worst_region_rms_after=0.495 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.999 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.495
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.542 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.542 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.389 arcsec matched=4830
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits N_match=4830 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=1440 n_q2=1013 n_q3=1418 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.070
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4830 N_valid=4830 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.147 bias_dec_arcsec=0.382 median_sep_arcsec=0.578 p95_sep_arcsec=1.614 n_q1=1440 n_q2=1013 n_q3=1418 n_q4=959 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bvsMjX83Ci (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=611, bad_region=1964, passed=8312
Got 8312 stars (including 5832 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8312 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4824 stars left (next iteration limit 5306)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4824 robust_rms=7.857 arcsec worst_region_rms=18.121 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=18.121 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4824 robust_rms=0.476 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.766 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.766 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4824 robust_rms=0.394 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.514 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.514 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4824 robust_rms_before=0.675 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.419 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.394 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.565 worst_region_rms_after=0.514 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.978 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.514
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.565 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.565 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.419 arcsec matched=4824
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits N_match=4824 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.454 n_q1=1440 n_q2=1022 n_q3=1406 n_q4=956 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.082
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4824 N_valid=4824 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.159 bias_dec_arcsec=0.377 median_sep_arcsec=0.587 p95_sep_arcsec=1.606 n_q1=1440 n_q2=1022 n_q3=1406 n_q4=956 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits sigma_overall=0.397 worst_q_ratio=1.217
ref2=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.147
new1=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits sigma_overall=0.403 worst_q_ratio=1.070
new2=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits sigma_overall=0.443 worst_q_ratio=1.082
reference average sigma_overall=0.4005 worst_q_ratio=1.182
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370_astrometric_residuals.png (4866 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371_astrometric_residuals.png (4860 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210_astrometric_residuals.png (4830 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211_astrometric_residuals.png (4824 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21412_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 21412_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:28.20 -05:17:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21607_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 21607_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:00.75 +00:55:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11807_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 11807_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:54.81 +00:56:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03205_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 03205_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:49:56.30 -05:08:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04153_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 04153_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:53.15 -04:32:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:19.239 -01:59:24.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89
Second-epoch image center 20:34:19.239 -01:59:24.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0249 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:20.532 -01:59:05.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89
Second-epoch image center 20:34:20.532 -01:59:05.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0320 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:19.239 -01:59:24.54
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:20.532 -01:59:05.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00749 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NN4Zw0xwxH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5jlVGnhi55
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eImxZqns0J
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.00RO0b5NAh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 116458 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to +3.2588 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to 3.2588 deg
Loaded 10831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7959 out of 9785 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9785 out of 116458 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.544800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.544800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.09
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 116458 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to +3.2588 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to 3.2588 deg
Loaded 10831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7959 out of 9785 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9785 out of 116458 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 116829 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7020 to 316.4481 deg, Dec -7.2679 to +3.2723 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7020 to 316.4481 deg, Dec -7.2679 to 3.2723 deg
Loaded 10830 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7953 out of 9799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9799 out of 116829 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 83 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
2.1 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
15.4 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.NN4Zw0xwxH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=9969, bad_region=16899, passed=116431
Got 116431 stars (including 90648 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 116431 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 103686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 103686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 103685 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5343)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=1574 n_q2=897 n_q3=1525 n_q4=862 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4858 N_valid=4858 bias_ra_arcsec=0.016 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.306 p95_sep_arcsec=1.317 n_q1=1574 n_q2=897 n_q3=1525 n_q4=862 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5jlVGnhi55 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=10115, bad_region=16944, passed=116800
Got 116800 stars (including 90836 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 116800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 104005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 104005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 104004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4856 stars left (next iteration limit 5341)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits N_match=4856 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1556 n_q2=906 n_q3=1529 n_q4=865 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4856 N_valid=4856 bias_ra_arcsec=0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.013 median_sep_arcsec=0.321 p95_sep_arcsec=1.280 n_q1=1556 n_q2=906 n_q3=1529 n_q4=865 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.eImxZqns0J (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3673, bad_region=10841, passed=64056
Got 64056 stars (including 50608 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64056 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4831 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4831 stars left (next iteration limit 5314)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=7.807 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.435 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.435 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=0.465 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.793 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.793 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=0.366 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.497 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.497 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4831 robust_rms_before=0.673 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.387 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.366 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.550 worst_region_rms_after=0.497 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.995 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.497
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.550 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.550 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.387 arcsec matched=4831
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits N_match=4831 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.405 n_q1=1472 n_q2=990 n_q3=1445 n_q4=924 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.066
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4831 N_valid=4831 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.143 bias_dec_arcsec=0.392 median_sep_arcsec=0.585 p95_sep_arcsec=1.548 n_q1=1472 n_q2=990 n_q3=1445 n_q4=924 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.00RO0b5NAh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3796, bad_region=10977, passed=64947
Got 64947 stars (including 51348 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64947 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4834 stars left (next iteration limit 5316)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4834 robust_rms=7.824 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.521 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.521 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4834 robust_rms=0.474 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.795 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.795 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4834 robust_rms=0.389 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.509 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.509 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4834 robust_rms_before=0.677 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.411 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.389 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.541 worst_region_rms_after=0.509 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.949 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.509
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.541 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.541 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.411 arcsec matched=4834
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits N_match=4834 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.451 n_q1=1479 n_q2=987 n_q3=1451 n_q4=917 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4834 N_valid=4834 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.161 bias_dec_arcsec=0.386 median_sep_arcsec=0.592 p95_sep_arcsec=1.542 n_q1=1479 n_q2=987 n_q3=1451 n_q4=917 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-54-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_233608_TTUQ2b1x1_663039_bl5yKznc/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:39:09.30 -00:40:47.4: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:41:10.95 -04:40:35.1: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:37:46.61 +00:44:57.9: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:23:25.15 +01:37:44.9: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:46:10.10 -02:15:11.0: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:27:05.41 +00:53:45.8: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:37:00.40 +01:45:44.3: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:52:08.23 -04:29:59.6: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:48:28.04 -01:56:14.5: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:46:10.10 -02:15:11.0: 14.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:41:10.95 -04:40:35.1: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:37:46.61 +00:44:57.9: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:27:05.41 +00:53:45.8: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:52:08.23 -04:29:59.6: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:48:28.04 -01:56:14.5: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:10.95 -04:40:35.1: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6808 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:46.61 +00:44:57.9: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8608 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:10.10 -02:15:11.0: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2456 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:05.41 +00:53:45.8: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6871 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:37:00.40 +01:45:44.3: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:08.23 -04:29:59.6: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4797 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:28.04 -01:56:14.5: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6905 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:39:09.30 -00:40:47.4: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:23:25.15 +01:37:44.9: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:00.40 +01:45:44.3: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2729 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:25.15 +01:37:44.9: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5941 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:09.30 -00:40:47.4: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8938 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:44:54.64 +00:57:19.6: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:44:54.64 +00:57:19.6: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:54.64 +00:57:19.6: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4447 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:46:15.28 -05:45:04.9: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:46:56.79 -05:14:50.7: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:32:53.45 +01:13:27.0: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:50:48.68 -04:06:53.2: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:47:01.37 -05:37:58.1: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:38:40.92 -06:00:10.1: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:32:53.45 +01:13:27.0: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:47:01.37 -05:37:58.1: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:53.45 +01:13:27.0: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3496 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:50:48.68 -04:06:53.2: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:01.37 -05:37:58.1: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5484 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:46:15.28 -05:45:04.9: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:46:56.79 -05:14:50.7: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:48.68 -04:06:53.2: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3126 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:15.28 -05:45:04.9: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0468 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:56.79 -05:14:50.7: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0829 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:47:39.28 -04:59:23.4: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:38:40.92 -06:00:10.1: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:40.92 -06:00:10.1: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0394 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:28:14.66 -03:21:35.6: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:47:39.28 -04:59:23.4: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:39.28 -04:59:23.4: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8463 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:47:29.29 +01:50:40.9: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:25:21.40 +01:46:02.1: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:28:14.66 -03:21:35.6: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:14.66 -03:21:35.6: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3853 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:47:29.29 +01:50:40.9: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:29.29 +01:50:40.9: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5540 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:48:48.73 +02:01:21.5: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:34:56.32 +00:40:46.2: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:36:34.28 -02:33:11.2: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:25:21.40 +01:46:02.1: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:21.40 +01:46:02.1: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9265 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:34:56.32 +00:40:46.2: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:56.32 +00:40:46.2: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0579 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:48:48.73 +02:01:21.5: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:36:34.28 -02:33:11.2: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:48.73 +02:01:21.5: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9006 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:34.28 -02:33:11.2: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0941 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:36:03.48 -02:28:26.5: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:48:41.08 +02:03:40.0: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:16:44.59 +01:09:47.7: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:21:32.00 +01:40:24.7: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:36:03.48 -02:28:26.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:48:41.08 +02:03:40.0: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:41.08 +02:03:40.0: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2744 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:29:54.60 -03:46:31.9: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:16:44.59 +01:09:47.7: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:50:06.20 +00:22:28.1: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:47:38.45 -05:05:58.0: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:44.59 +01:09:47.7: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4461 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:21:32.00 +01:40:24.7: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:34:29.07 -05:50:59.2: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:32:51.03 -03:46:07.8: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:32.00 +01:40:24.7: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3427 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:29:54.60 -03:46:31.9: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:39:14.65 +01:40:26.8: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:47:38.45 -05:05:58.0: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:50:06.20 +00:22:28.1: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:38.45 -05:05:58.0: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6578 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:34:29.07 -05:50:59.2: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:06.20 +00:22:28.1: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7938 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:32:51.03 -03:46:07.8: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:29.07 -05:50:59.2: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5979 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:51.03 -03:46:07.8: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7286 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:33:13.76 -03:28:48.8: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:39:14.65 +01:40:26.8: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:14.65 +01:40:26.8: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9415 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:32:00.32 -03:53:58.4: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:33:13.76 -03:28:48.8: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:13.76 -03:28:48.8: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7446 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:32:00.32 -03:53:58.4: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:22:18.90 -03:21:12.3: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:00.32 -03:53:58.4: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8658 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:40:29.68 -03:50:08.9: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:35:12.26 +00:20:02.8: 14.28 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:22:18.90 -03:21:12.3: 13.80 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:18.90 -03:21:12.3: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7772 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:40:29.68 -03:50:08.9: 14.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:29.68 -03:50:08.9: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0429 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:35:12.26 +00:20:02.8: 14.34 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:12.26 +00:20:02.8: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2873 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out141354.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out143451.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135864_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135864_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135866_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135866_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135882_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135882_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135885_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135885_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135886_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135886_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135887_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135887_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135890_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135890_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:37:26.83 +02:11:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135892_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135892_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135896_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135896_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135901_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135901_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135904_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135904_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:08.33 -01:37:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135906_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135906_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135907_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135907_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:21.61 -00:30:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135908_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135908_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135909_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135909_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:30.38 -02:03:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135912_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135912_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:34.36 -03:32:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135914_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135914_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135916_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135916_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135918_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135918_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:38:53.02 -03:51:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135920_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135920_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135922_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135922_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135924_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135924_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135925_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 135925_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:58.87 +00:00:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136602_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 136602_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136755_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 136755_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:00.75 +00:55:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136765_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 136765_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137606_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 137606_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137732_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 137732_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137874_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 137874_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:35.70 +00:43:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137943_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 137943_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:29.55 +01:48:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138642_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 138642_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138761_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 138761_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138928_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 138928_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138996_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 138996_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:53.62 -05:39:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139408_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 139408_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:36:41.49 -02:35:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139473_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 139473_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:14.24 +02:07:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139715_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 139715_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:34:23.59 -00:27:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139928_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 139928_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:26.69 +01:44:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140256_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 140256_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140494_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 140494_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140590_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 140590_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140622_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 140622_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140736_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 140736_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140793_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 140793_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141014_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 141014_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:19:47.91 -00:53:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141056_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 141056_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:24.00 -03:21:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141149_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 141149_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:25:46.54 +00:58:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141163_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 141163_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141354_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 141354_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141420_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 141420_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141642_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 141642_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:35:30.71 +01:48:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141948_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 141948_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:31:57.58 +01:21:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141955_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 141955_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:55.75 -02:29:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142134_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 142134_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142253_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 142253_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142795_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 142795_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:11.43 +00:22:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143451_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 143451_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143785_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 143785_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143842_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 143842_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143874_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 143874_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144064_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 144064_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144507_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 144507_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144549_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 144549_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144821_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 144821_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145578_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 145578_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145725_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 145725_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145802_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 145802_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145849_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 145849_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145939_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 145939_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146026_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 146026_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146044_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 146044_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146128_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 146128_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146434_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 146434_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146724_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 146724_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146842_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 146842_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146880_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 146880_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18839_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 18839_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:49:56.29 -05:08:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54961_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 54961_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:18.59 -01:59:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18618_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 18618_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:28.15 -05:17:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53706_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 53706_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:21.49 -02:06:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26247_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 26247_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:53.17 -04:32:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12125_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 12125_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102521_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 102521_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-55-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks