This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.0348 2461334.5348 10.66 19:30:14.93 -24:49:07.3
14.17481 -19.11954 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.8 Flora 0 -0 0 10.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:30:14.93 -24:49:07.3: 14.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:30:14.93 -24:49:07.3: 14.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.5348,10.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.0348 10.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.0348 2461334.5348 12.96 19:18:27.28 -27:20:34.2
10.66708 -17.60281 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis -0 0 0 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:18:27.28 -27:20:34.2: 14.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:18:27.28 -27:20:34.2: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.5348,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.0348 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.0348 2461334.5348 12.90 18:54:31.93 -25:33:40.6
10.17126 -11.98090 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides -3 0 3 12.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:54:31.93 -25:33:40.6: 14.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:54:31.93 -25:33:40.6: 14.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.5348,12.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.0348 12.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.0348 2461334.5348 11.78 19:01:28.74 -22:39:00.8
13.55269 -12.21467 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 1.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V1058 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.400 pg < 16.100 pg 2427375.00000 235.000000000000 Me
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:01:28.74 -22:39:00.8: 12.75 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:01:28.74 -22:39:00.8: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1058 Sgr,2461334.5348,11.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1058 Sgr 20261021.0348 11.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.90695453 17.04.2026 09:45:50.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
First image: 2461147.90695453 17.04.2026 09:45:50.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Last image: 2461334.53504994 21.10.2026 00:50:18.315 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5797
Objects passed selection criteria: 5787
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4940
Average stars matched: 3841.25 (77.7581 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233288 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 20 19:52:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.90695453 17.04.2026 09:45:50.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
First image: 2461147.90695453 17.04.2026 09:45:50.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Last image: 2461334.53504994 21.10.2026 00:50:18.315 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 41
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 77466
Objects passed selection criteria: 77290
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 61702.5
Average stars matched: 51167.8 (82.9265 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 564000 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 20 19:55:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461334.53463601
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Image size: 936.8'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.222 -26:01:18.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.222 -26:01:18.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0410 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Image size: 936.8'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.582 -26:01:08.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.582 -26:01:08.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0413 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:01.222 -26:01:18.09
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:01.582 -26:01:08.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00306 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QWual8jtoO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ch2VtOg1xF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q03EjBmb4z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jLTZNsHoLG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6297 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.5158 to 296.7476 deg, Dec -31.5070 to -20.1279 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.5158 to 296.7476 deg, Dec -31.5070 to -20.1279 deg
Loaded 14496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5080 out of 5189 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5189 out of 6297 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.136550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.136550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.02
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.02
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6297 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.5158 to 296.7476 deg, Dec -31.5070 to -20.1279 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.5158 to 296.7476 deg, Dec -31.5070 to -20.1279 deg
Loaded 14496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5080 out of 5189 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5189 out of 6297 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 10687 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9550 to 297.0903 deg, Dec -31.2648 to -20.5647 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9550 to 297.0903 deg, Dec -31.2648 to -20.5647 deg
Loaded 13345 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7818 out of 8092 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8092 out of 10687 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.0 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.QWual8jtoO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, bad_region=879, passed=6297
Got 6297 stars (including 5071 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6297 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4821 stars left (next iteration limit 5303)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits N_match=4821 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=1652 n_q2=620 n_q3=1756 n_q4=793 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4821 N_valid=4821 bias_ra_arcsec=0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.293 p95_sep_arcsec=3.951 n_q1=1652 n_q2=620 n_q3=1756 n_q4=793 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Ch2VtOg1xF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=726, bad_region=1847, passed=10687
Got 10687 stars (including 8208 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10687 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9226 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9226 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9226 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4820 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=4820 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.625 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.489 n_q1=1636 n_q2=777 n_q3=1508 n_q4=899 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4820 N_valid=4820 bias_ra_arcsec=0.012 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.007 median_sep_arcsec=0.410 p95_sep_arcsec=2.853 n_q1=1636 n_q2=777 n_q3=1508 n_q4=899 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.q03EjBmb4z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=647, bad_region=785, passed=3522
Got 3522 stars (including 2195 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3522 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2157 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2137 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2137 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2157 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2137 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2137 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 2137 stars left (next iteration limit 2350)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2137 robust_rms=7.674 arcsec worst_region_rms=17.341 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=17.341 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2137 robust_rms=0.516 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.797 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.797 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2137 robust_rms=0.476 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.748 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.748 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2137 robust_rms_before=0.745 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.643 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.476 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.878 worst_region_rms_after=0.748 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.049 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.748
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.sip_refit.kURrZZ/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.sip_refit.kURrZZ/candidate.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.221 -26:01:18.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3522 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.sip_refit.kURrZZ/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_2466116.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.sip_refit.kURrZZ/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.seqluV' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_2466116.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.745 -> 0.476 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 2137 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2044 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 2044 pairs (2137 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2044 robust_rms=7.571 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.883 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.883 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2044 robust_rms=0.497 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.772 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.772 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2044 robust_rms=0.467 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.713 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.713 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2044 robust_rms_before=0.466 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.466 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.467 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.749 worst_region_rms_after=0.713 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.749 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.713
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.sip_refit.6VIwDX/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.sip_refit.6VIwDX/candidate.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.221 -26:01:18.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3522 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.sip_refit.6VIwDX/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_2466327.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.sip_refit.6VIwDX/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.GmRu24' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_2466327.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.466 -> 0.467 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2044 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2044 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
SIP_REFIT: the refit moved 62 of 3522 stars by more than 1.00 arcsec (at most 2.37 arcsec) - the pairs no longer describe the solution, matching the catalog again
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 2, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 2044 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2046 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 2046 pairs (2044 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2046 robust_rms=7.565 arcsec worst_region_rms=17.058 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=17.058 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2046 robust_rms=0.497 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.772 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.772 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2046 robust_rms=0.467 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.711 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.711 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2046 robust_rms_before=0.467 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.459 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.467 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.704 worst_region_rms_after=0.711 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.720 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.711
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.711 vs 0.704 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2046 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2046 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits N_match=2046 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.661 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.502 n_q1=699 n_q2=448 n_q3=538 n_q4=361 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.454
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2046 N_valid=2046 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.018 median_sep_arcsec=0.361 p95_sep_arcsec=1.298 n_q1=699 n_q2=448 n_q3=538 n_q4=361 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jLTZNsHoLG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=641, bad_region=860, passed=3746
Got 3746 stars (including 2364 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3746 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2326 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2305 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2306 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2304 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2326 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2304 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2304 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 2304 stars left (next iteration limit 2534)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2304 robust_rms=7.457 arcsec worst_region_rms=18.905 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=18.905 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2304 robust_rms=0.486 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.741 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.741 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2304 robust_rms=0.465 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.655 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.652 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2304 robust_rms_before=0.778 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.630 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.465 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.867 worst_region_rms_after=0.655 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.036 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.652
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.sip_refit.Nd6n44/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.sip_refit.Nd6n44/candidate.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.584 -26:01:08.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3747 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.sip_refit.Nd6n44/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_2466127.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.sip_refit.Nd6n44/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.eEHQVD' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_2466127.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.778 -> 0.465 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 2304 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2202 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 2202 pairs (2304 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2202 robust_rms=7.302 arcsec worst_region_rms=18.900 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=18.900 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2202 robust_rms=0.474 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.732 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.732 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2202 robust_rms=0.455 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.672 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.672 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2202 robust_rms_before=0.456 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.456 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.455 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.657 worst_region_rms_after=0.672 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.657 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.672
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.672 vs 0.657 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2202 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2202 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=2202 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.521 n_q1=738 n_q2=476 n_q3=604 n_q4=384 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.365
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2202 N_valid=2202 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.009 median_sep_arcsec=0.357 p95_sep_arcsec=1.296 n_q1=738 n_q2=476 n_q3=604 n_q4=384 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.464 worst_q_ratio=1.106
ref2=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits sigma_overall=0.563 worst_q_ratio=1.111
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits sigma_overall=0.455 worst_q_ratio=1.454
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.449 worst_q_ratio=1.365
reference average sigma_overall=0.5135 worst_q_ratio=1.1085
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4821 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055_astrometric_residuals.png (4820 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000_astrometric_residuals.png (2046 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (2202 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:30:14.93 -24:49:07.3: 14.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:30:14.93 -24:49:07.3: 14.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24280.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24280_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 24280_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:30:14.93 -24:49:07.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.221 -26:01:18.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.221 -26:01:18.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0411 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.584 -26:01:08.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.584 -26:01:08.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0413 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:01.221 -26:01:18.40
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:01.584 -26:01:08.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00307 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fwLZbr5XTC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4wLhQ6wMC4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uESVv8oD2K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wBF56myrGg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 84103 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.4864 to 296.7493 deg, Dec -31.5437 to -20.0386 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.4864 to 296.7493 deg, Dec -31.5437 to -20.0386 deg
Loaded 14698 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10647 out of 11707 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11707 out of 84103 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 21.872800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=21.872800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 84103 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.4864 to 296.7493 deg, Dec -31.5437 to -20.0386 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.4864 to 296.7493 deg, Dec -31.5437 to -20.0386 deg
Loaded 14698 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10647 out of 11707 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11707 out of 84103 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 118893 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9116 to 297.0918 deg, Dec -31.2648 to -20.5524 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9116 to 297.0918 deg, Dec -31.2648 to -20.5524 deg
Loaded 13402 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10008 out of 11605 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11605 out of 118893 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 32 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
14.5 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 12.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fwLZbr5XTC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4218, bad_region=8669, passed=84096
Got 84096 stars (including 71322 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84096 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4822 stars left (next iteration limit 5303)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits N_match=4822 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=1678 n_q2=686 n_q3=1638 n_q4=820 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4822 N_valid=4822 bias_ra_arcsec=0.019 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.018 median_sep_arcsec=0.291 p95_sep_arcsec=2.069 n_q1=1678 n_q2=686 n_q3=1638 n_q4=820 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4wLhQ6wMC4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=8799, bad_region=12630, passed=118884
Got 118884 stars (including 98108 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 118884 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4834 stars left (next iteration limit 5318)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=4834 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.625 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.499 n_q1=1702 n_q2=791 n_q3=1422 n_q4=919 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4834 N_valid=4834 bias_ra_arcsec=0.021 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.017 median_sep_arcsec=0.406 p95_sep_arcsec=2.342 n_q1=1702 n_q2=791 n_q3=1422 n_q4=919 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.uESVv8oD2K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1767, bad_region=5741, passed=38257
Got 38257 stars (including 31215 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38257 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=7.190 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.644 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.644 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.528 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.845 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.845 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.492 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.768 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.768 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=0.490 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.567 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.492 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.750 worst_region_rms_after=0.768 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.750 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.768
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.750 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.750 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.490 arcsec matched=4873
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.760 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.646 n_q1=1639 n_q2=938 n_q3=1479 n_q4=817 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.393
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4873 N_valid=4873 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.387 p95_sep_arcsec=1.982 n_q1=1639 n_q2=938 n_q3=1479 n_q4=817 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wBF56myrGg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1914, bad_region=6065, passed=40352
Got 40352 stars (including 32913 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40352 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5355)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=7.106 arcsec worst_region_rms=17.247 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=17.247 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.511 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.740 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.740 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.486 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.689 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.689 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=0.482 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.557 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.486 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.687 worst_region_rms_after=0.689 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.687 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.689
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.687 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.687 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.482 arcsec matched=4870
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.757 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.654 n_q1=1654 n_q2=937 n_q3=1482 n_q4=797 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.392
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4870 N_valid=4870 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.391 p95_sep_arcsec=1.953 n_q1=1654 n_q2=937 n_q3=1482 n_q4=797 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-49-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_195059_TTUQ2b1x1_2455430_hAnhpfpA/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:30:23.00 -25:09:58.9: 13.02 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:07:40.63 -28:20:07.5: 9.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:03:48.17 -22:43:50.7: 10.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:03:48.17 -22:43:50.7: 10.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:07:40.63 -28:20:07.5: 9.93 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.94 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:03:48.17 -22:43:50.7: ref_mag=10.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8261 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:40.63 -28:20:07.5: ref_mag=9.94 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0104 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:30:23.00 -25:09:58.9: 12.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:23.00 -25:09:58.9: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0304 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:29:27.33 -24:12:57.1: 12.67 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:18:27.28 -27:20:34.2: 14.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:54:31.93 -25:33:40.6: 14.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:14:27.37 -23:37:02.5: 14.52 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:57:40.25 -26:40:25.1: 13.07 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:01:28.74 -22:39:00.8: 12.75 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:29:27.33 -24:12:57.1: 12.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:18:27.28 -27:20:34.2: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:54:31.93 -25:33:40.6: 14.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:27.33 -24:12:57.1: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9511 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:14:27.37 -23:37:02.5: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:14:27.37 -23:37:02.5: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=13.0195 delta=1.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:57:40.25 -26:40:25.1: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:57:40.25 -26:40:25.1: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.0546 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:01:28.74 -22:39:00.8: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:01:28.74 -22:39:00.8: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=11.7759 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out135304.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out30107.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out134546.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out135191.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73312.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129038_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 129038_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129040_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 129040_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:24.76 -23:14:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129042_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 129042_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129634_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 129634_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:30:14.92 -24:49:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130061_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 130061_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.32 -22:42:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130065_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 130065_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130165_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 130165_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130360_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 130360_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130716_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 130716_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:53.29 -28:07:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130770_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 130770_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:23:21.08 -23:53:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131288_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 131288_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:43.47 -29:00:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132049_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 132049_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132375_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 132375_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:22.73 -29:30:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132441_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 132441_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:32.98 -22:06:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132566_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 132566_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:27.78 -25:16:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132677_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 132677_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:21.17 -30:09:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132873_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 132873_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.43 -29:11:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133511_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133511_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:40.96 -27:41:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133597_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133597_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:59.91 -21:49:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133937_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133937_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:46.90 -22:16:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134375_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 134375_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134546_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 134546_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135191_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 135191_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135304_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 135304_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:27.37 -23:37:02.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.03)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.977 6770951208401977472 288.61433777902 -23.61736488568 13.0187 10.8900 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.977#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30107_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 30107_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:40.25 -26:40:25.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.07, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.05)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.809 4073549332339731200 284.41745987366 -26.67367374700 12.8113 10.6680 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.809#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77212_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 77212_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:32.89 -23:07:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73312_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 73312_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38165_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 38165_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:07.28 -26:00:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26303_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 26303_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:18.73 -27:05:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106404_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 106404_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:29.42 -24:06:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26719_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 26719_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:26.62 -27:02:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103227_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 103227_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_19-50-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks