This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.3429 2461332.8429 13.01 04:33:21.51 +25:57:14.9
172.92222 -14.70964 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata -0 0 1 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:21.51 +25:57:14.9: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:21.51 +25:57:14.9: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 19.3429* 04 33 21.51 +25 57 14.9 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.8429,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.3429 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.3429 2461332.8429 13.30 04:31:40.74 +25:57:33.7
172.66280 -14.99190 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia -0 0 0 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:40.74 +25:57:33.7: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:40.74 +25:57:33.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 19.3429* 04 31 40.74 +25 57 33.7 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.8429,13.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.3429 13.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.3429 2461332.8429 14.29 04:51:32.53 +23:43:31.7
177.38505 -12.92037 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1219 Britta -1 -0 1 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:32.53 +23:43:31.7: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:32.53 +23:43:31.7: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 19.3429* 04 51 32.53 +23 43 31.7 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.8429,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.3429 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.3429 2461332.8429 14.46 04:52:46.81 +21:41:12.5
179.22749 -13.93340 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.940 Kordula -0 -0 0 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:46.81 +21:41:12.5: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:46.81 +21:41:12.5: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 19.3429* 04 52 46.81 +21 41 12.5 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.8429,14.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.3429 14.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.3429 2461332.8429 14.58 04:42:39.12 +20:28:50.0
178.71926 -16.54027 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.311 Claudia 1 -1 1 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:39.12 +20:28:50.0: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:39.12 +20:28:50.0: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 19.3429* 04 42 39.12 +20 28 50.0 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.8429,14.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.3429 14.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.3429 2461332.8429 15.17 04:34:05.63 +21:43:15.8
176.39941 -17.31328 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1256 Normannia -1 -0 1 15.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:05.63 +21:43:15.8: 16.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:05.63 +21:43:15.8: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 19.3429* 04 34 05.63 +21 43 15.8 15.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.8429,15.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.3429 15.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461332.84333471 19.10.2026 08:14:14.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10770
Objects passed selection criteria: 10724
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8236.75
Average stars matched: 7568.25 (91.8839 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235724 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 19 03:22:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461332.84333471 19.10.2026 08:14:14.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 106
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 77232
Objects passed selection criteria: 77033
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 60640.8
Average stars matched: 55774 (91.9745 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 293652 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 19 03:23:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461332.84252375
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.957 +21:59:55.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:55.957 +21:59:55.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0051 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.717 +22:00:49.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:56.717 +22:00:49.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0201 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:55.957 +21:59:55.65
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:56.717 +22:00:49.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01515 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.52eplhmuRj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yJrYbXWBOu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits &> /tmp/tmp.45oOT6IiT9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ukxNFvEVOj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.991000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.991000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2796 deg
Loaded 5169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3956 out of 4300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4300 out of 11076 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.52eplhmuRj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=2517, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 8622 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4820 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4820 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1641 n_q2=611 n_q3=1816 n_q4=752 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4820 N_valid=4820 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.019 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.017 median_sep_arcsec=0.253 p95_sep_arcsec=1.217 n_q1=1641 n_q2=611 n_q3=1816 n_q4=752 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.yJrYbXWBOu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=897, bad_region=2444, passed=11076
Got 11076 stars (including 7922 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4818 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4818 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1645 n_q2=622 n_q3=1785 n_q4=766 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4818 N_valid=4818 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.016 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.292 p95_sep_arcsec=1.156 n_q1=1645 n_q2=622 n_q3=1785 n_q4=766 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.45oOT6IiT9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=685, bad_region=3346, passed=10930
Got 10930 stars (including 7085 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10930 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8249 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8249 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8249 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5354)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=8.082 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.132 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.132 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.482 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.877 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.877 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.359 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.512 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.512 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=1.090 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.383 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.359 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.529 worst_region_rms_after=0.512 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.208 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.512
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.529 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.529 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.383 arcsec matched=4869
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.431 n_q1=1418 n_q2=1134 n_q3=1492 n_q4=825 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4869 N_valid=4869 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.523 bias_dec_arcsec=0.678 median_sep_arcsec=0.994 p95_sep_arcsec=2.017 n_q1=1418 n_q2=1134 n_q3=1492 n_q4=825 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ukxNFvEVOj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=704, bad_region=3366, passed=10857
Got 10857 stars (including 6975 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10857 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=8.126 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.829 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.829 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.501 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.880 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.880 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.367 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.509 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.509 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=1.115 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.392 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.367 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.542 worst_region_rms_after=0.509 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.228 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.509
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.542 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.542 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.392 arcsec matched=4871
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.460 n_q1=1434 n_q2=1138 n_q3=1478 n_q4=821 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4871 N_valid=4871 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.567 bias_dec_arcsec=0.656 median_sep_arcsec=1.010 p95_sep_arcsec=2.060 n_q1=1434 n_q2=1138 n_q3=1478 n_q4=821 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.284
ref2=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.245
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.133
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits sigma_overall=0.411 worst_q_ratio=1.119
reference average sigma_overall=0.3385 worst_q_ratio=1.2645
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (4820 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4818 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460_astrometric_residuals.png (4869 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461_astrometric_residuals.png (4871 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:24:24.00 +17:53:04.2: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:13.79 +25:16:23.9: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:06.51 +21:14:33.0: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:07.51 +22:37:22.8: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:24.78 +22:49:13.0: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:29.45 +21:39:35.2: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:26.23 +22:23:29.8: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:33.63 +22:12:43.7: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:44.27 +21:57:43.3: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:24:24.00 +17:53:04.2: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:33.63 +22:12:43.7: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:13.79 +25:16:23.9: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:24.78 +22:49:13.0: 12.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:06.51 +21:14:33.0: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:07.51 +22:37:22.8: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:26.23 +22:23:29.8: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:29.45 +21:39:35.2: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:44.27 +21:57:43.3: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:13.79 +25:16:23.9: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7125 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:24.00 +17:53:04.2: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4307 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:06.51 +21:14:33.0: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4825 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:33.63 +22:12:43.7: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4565 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:24.78 +22:49:13.0: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5813 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:07.51 +22:37:22.8: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5123 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:29.45 +21:39:35.2: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5658 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:26.23 +22:23:29.8: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5560 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:44.27 +21:57:43.3: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3736 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21182_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 21182_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21822_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 21822_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21915_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 21915_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21968_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 21968_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21986_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 21986_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21989_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 21989_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22063_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 22063_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22069_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 22069_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22075_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 22075_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.957 +21:59:55.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:55.957 +21:59:55.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0051 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.717 +22:00:49.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:56.717 +22:00:49.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0201 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:55.957 +21:59:55.65
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:56.717 +22:00:49.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01515 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fkdX5BZHRk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IO0fvkyXb2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2jiv9GyxiC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fv1qylu3Js
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.845600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.845600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 80651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec +16.4671 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec 16.4671 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 5197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3489 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 80651 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 87 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.8 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.7 (SNR ) 14.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fkdX5BZHRk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=6242, bad_region=13891, passed=86324
Got 86324 stars (including 66886 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5332)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1602 n_q2=612 n_q3=1848 n_q4=786 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4848 N_valid=4848 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.018 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.009 median_sep_arcsec=0.248 p95_sep_arcsec=1.203 n_q1=1602 n_q2=612 n_q3=1848 n_q4=786 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.IO0fvkyXb2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=5759, bad_region=13221, passed=80633
Got 80633 stars (including 62313 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5329)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1583 n_q2=633 n_q3=1821 n_q4=807 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4844 N_valid=4844 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.018 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.280 p95_sep_arcsec=1.124 n_q1=1583 n_q2=633 n_q3=1821 n_q4=807 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2jiv9GyxiC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4385, bad_region=16381, passed=68013
Got 68013 stars (including 48698 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68013 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5355)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=8.157 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.294 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.294 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.488 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.908 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.908 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.522 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.522 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=1.084 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.386 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.360 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.554 worst_region_rms_after=0.522 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.209 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.522
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.554 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.554 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.386 arcsec matched=4869
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.435 n_q1=1443 n_q2=1110 n_q3=1487 n_q4=829 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4869 N_valid=4869 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.522 bias_dec_arcsec=0.679 median_sep_arcsec=0.991 p95_sep_arcsec=2.034 n_q1=1443 n_q2=1110 n_q3=1487 n_q4=829 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Fv1qylu3Js (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=4521, bad_region=16638, passed=69247
Got 69247 stars (including 49592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69247 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=8.179 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.026 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.026 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.502 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.907 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.907 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.368 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.509 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.509 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=1.104 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.389 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.368 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.538 worst_region_rms_after=0.509 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.220 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.509
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.538 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.538 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.389 arcsec matched=4869
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=1462 n_q2=1106 n_q3=1480 n_q4=821 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4869 N_valid=4869 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.569 bias_dec_arcsec=0.654 median_sep_arcsec=1.001 p95_sep_arcsec=2.040 n_q1=1462 n_q2=1106 n_q3=1480 n_q4=821 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_032007_TTUQ2b1x1_1858746_d7R5uxIE/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:54.54 +20:21:14.0: 14.92 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:31.66 +25:47:54.4: 14.71 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:13.89 +23:28:59.0: 15.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:51.27 +24:37:03.1: 15.19 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:47.68 +20:46:26.3: 15.28 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:21.57 +20:08:34.2: 15.21 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:50:59.45 +24:13:59.4: 15.07 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:38.37 +18:39:22.5: 15.21 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:32.09 +22:23:26.1: 14.93 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:36.84 +23:07:53.5: 14.88 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:50:59.45 +24:13:59.4: 15.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:21.57 +20:08:34.2: 15.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:31.66 +25:47:54.4: 14.62 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:47.68 +20:46:26.3: 15.32 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:51.27 +24:37:03.1: 15.37 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:54.54 +20:21:14.0: 14.89 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:32.09 +22:23:26.1: 14.61 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:38.37 +18:39:22.5: 15.24 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:13.89 +23:28:59.0: 15.32 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:59.45 +24:13:59.4: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0654 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:21.57 +20:08:34.2: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1006 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:31.66 +25:47:54.4: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7052 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:47.68 +20:46:26.3: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1636 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:32.09 +22:23:26.1: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.9160 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:51.27 +24:37:03.1: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1365 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:54.54 +20:21:14.0: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=15.0133 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:13.89 +23:28:59.0: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0862 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:38.37 +18:39:22.5: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9943 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:36.84 +23:07:53.5: 14.81 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:36.84 +23:07:53.5: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8327 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:13.45 +21:18:39.3: 13.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:32:53.06 +19:13:36.0: 14.90 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:43:38.85 +18:06:54.3: 13.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:46.03 +23:17:22.9: 14.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:49:31.77 +21:37:20.2: 15.01 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:51.13 +25:27:20.1: 14.64 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:52.94 +18:38:37.4: 14.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:21.51 +25:57:14.9: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:32:53.06 +19:13:36.0: 14.85 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:46.03 +23:17:22.9: 14.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:51.13 +25:27:20.1: 14.53 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:52.94 +18:38:37.4: 14.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:13.45 +21:18:39.3: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:43:38.85 +18:06:54.3: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:49:31.77 +21:37:20.2: 14.99 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:53.06 +19:13:36.0: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7543 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:51.13 +25:27:20.1: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7161 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:46.03 +23:17:22.9: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2789 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:52.94 +18:38:37.4: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4831 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:13.45 +21:18:39.3: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8198 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:38.85 +18:06:54.3: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.3610 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:31.77 +21:37:20.2: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7167 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:40.74 +25:57:33.7: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:21.51 +25:57:14.9: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:40.74 +25:57:33.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:47.25 +22:58:08.2: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:54.34 +26:03:38.3: 14.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:02.08 +24:08:02.2: 14.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:17.88 +24:00:00.8: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:27:17.81 +23:02:02.2: 14.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:47.25 +22:58:08.2: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:47.25 +22:58:08.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9198 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:26.71 +18:49:54.9: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:32.53 +23:43:31.7: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:03.65 +17:44:06.0: 14.57 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:17.88 +24:00:00.8: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:27:17.81 +23:02:02.2: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:54.34 +26:03:38.3: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:02.08 +24:08:02.2: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:17.81 +23:02:02.2: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3466 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:02.08 +24:08:02.2: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1785 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:17.88 +24:00:00.8: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1072 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:54.34 +26:03:38.3: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3170 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:26.71 +18:49:54.9: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:26.71 +18:49:54.9: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2821 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:32.53 +23:43:31.7: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:03.65 +17:44:06.0: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:03.65 +17:44:06.0: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4813 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:25.27 +17:51:20.8: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:48.38 +19:42:38.4: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:45.45 +19:58:01.9: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:51.14 +22:09:13.4: 14.76 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:26:13.63 +21:46:21.9: 14.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:25.27 +17:51:20.8: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:25.27 +17:51:20.8: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3902 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:54.39 +20:03:34.8: 14.39 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:46.81 +21:41:12.5: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:51.14 +22:09:13.4: 14.76 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:45.45 +19:58:01.9: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:48.38 +19:42:38.4: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:51.14 +22:09:13.4: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6557 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:45.45 +19:58:01.9: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4040 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:48.38 +19:42:38.4: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4333 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:26:13.63 +21:46:21.9: 14.44 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:13.63 +21:46:21.9: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6299 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:54.39 +20:03:34.8: 14.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:54.39 +20:03:34.8: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4688 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:46.81 +21:41:12.5: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:01.17 +19:10:17.0: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:55.58 +23:59:03.4: 14.57 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:39.12 +20:28:50.0: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:14.71 +23:46:25.0: 14.29 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:01.17 +19:10:17.0: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:01.17 +19:10:17.0: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5118 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:54.99 +19:44:30.7: 14.89 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:55.58 +23:59:03.4: 14.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:39.12 +20:28:50.0: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:55.58 +23:59:03.4: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6532 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:14.71 +23:46:25.0: 14.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:14.71 +23:46:25.0: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5980 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:19.32 +20:35:23.6: 15.22 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:54.99 +19:44:30.7: 14.75 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:54.99 +19:44:30.7: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8984 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:19.80 +18:19:22.0: 15.32 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:19.32 +20:35:23.6: 15.19 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:19.32 +20:35:23.6: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0164 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:31.68 +19:07:25.9: 15.17 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:05.63 +21:43:15.8: 16.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:19.80 +18:19:22.0: 15.40 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:19.80 +18:19:22.0: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0531 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:05.63 +21:43:15.8: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:31.68 +19:07:25.9: 15.05 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:47.39 +23:56:57.2: 15.47 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:31.68 +19:07:25.9: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0784 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:50.27 +26:12:35.4: 15.34 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:47.39 +23:56:57.2: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:47.39 +23:56:57.2: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0455 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:57.31 +24:09:03.1: 15.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:50.27 +26:12:35.4: 15.22 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:50.27 +26:12:35.4: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1183 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:02.04 +21:30:29.1: 15.73 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:57.31 +24:09:03.1: 15.59 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:57.31 +24:09:03.1: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0604 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:02.04 +21:30:29.1: 15.57 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.65 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:02.04 +21:30:29.1: ref_mag=15.65 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1994 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:00.75 +19:12:13.3: 15.38 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:05.63 +17:58:32.6: 15.20 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:00.75 +19:12:13.3: 15.38 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:00.75 +19:12:13.3: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1399 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:37.81 +22:13:24.6: 14.98 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:36.82 +21:08:34.6: 15.23 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:05.63 +17:58:32.6: 15.46 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:05.63 +17:58:32.6: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1523 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:37.81 +22:13:24.6: 14.94 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:37.81 +22:13:24.6: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9803 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:36.82 +21:08:34.6: 15.05 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:36.82 +21:08:34.6: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1063 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:50:51.71 +24:38:38.2: 15.83 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:46.24 +21:12:15.4: 15.26 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:50:51.71 +24:38:38.2: 15.66 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.74 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:51.71 +24:38:38.2: ref_mag=15.74 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.1940 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:06.17 +21:25:43.9: 15.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:46.24 +21:12:15.4: 16.03 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:46.24 +21:12:15.4: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1929 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:06.17 +21:25:43.9: 15.24 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:06.17 +21:25:43.9: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0297 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:26.84 +22:32:58.8: 15.24 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:04.72 +18:09:11.4: 15.23 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:26.84 +22:32:58.8: 15.47 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:26.84 +22:32:58.8: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.2059 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:21:19.73 +20:54:23.4: 15.63 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:04.72 +18:09:11.4: 15.28 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:04.72 +18:09:11.4: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0834 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:41.10 +22:32:07.8: 15.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:21:19.73 +20:54:23.4: 15.46 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.54 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:19.73 +20:54:23.4: ref_mag=15.54 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.2352 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:41.10 +22:32:07.8: 15.48 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:41.10 +22:32:07.8: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.2173 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:23.52 +25:49:08.0: 15.72 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:38.09 +22:23:10.1: 15.32 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:26:29.80 +21:16:54.0: 15.40 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:23.52 +25:49:08.0: 15.56 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.64 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:23.52 +25:49:08.0: ref_mag=15.64 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.2780 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:20.23 +24:37:32.3: 15.76 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:38.09 +22:23:10.1: 15.41 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:17.24 +22:33:58.9: 15.23 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:38.09 +22:23:10.1: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1531 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:56:10.39 +25:36:24.8: 15.73 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:30.52 +20:35:38.1: 15.23 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:26:29.80 +21:16:54.0: 15.47 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:29.80 +21:16:54.0: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0508 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:20.23 +24:37:32.3: 15.70 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.74 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:20.23 +24:37:32.3: ref_mag=15.74 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.2585 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:17.24 +22:33:58.9: 15.21 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:17.24 +22:33:58.9: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1354 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:56:10.39 +25:36:24.8: 15.46 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:10.39 +25:36:24.8: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1826 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:30.52 +20:35:38.1: 15.25 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:30.52 +20:35:38.1: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0743 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103073.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103686.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out107923.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108997.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out109443.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111518.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100448_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100448_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100449_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100449_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100451_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100451_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100454_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100454_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100460_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100460_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100463_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100463_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100464_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100464_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100466_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100466_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100467_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100467_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100470_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100470_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100471_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100471_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100475_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100475_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100477_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100477_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100483_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100483_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100487_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100487_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100488_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100488_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100490_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100490_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100493_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100493_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100497_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100497_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:44.36 +25:22:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100499_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 100499_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101182_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 101182_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.71 +19:10:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102198_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 102198_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:45.26 +19:28:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103073_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
Preparing report for the candidate 103073_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103194_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 103194_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:38.38 +22:42:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103686_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
Preparing report for the candidate 103686_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103804_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 103804_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:24.69 +22:56:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103948_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 103948_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:45.21 +19:58:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104401_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 104401_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:07.85 +21:31:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104927_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 104927_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:16.58 +21:52:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104995_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 104995_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:25.47 +18:42:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105101_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 105101_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:30.07 +21:45:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105469_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 105469_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:42.99 +22:12:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105956_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 105956_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106183_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 106183_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:38.50 +17:55:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107013_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 107013_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:59.00 +20:19:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107056_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 107056_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107134_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 107134_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:28.49 +23:36:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107165_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 107165_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107648_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 107648_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107801_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 107801_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107839_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 107839_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107923_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
Preparing report for the candidate 107923_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108112_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 108112_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108208_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 108208_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108255_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 108255_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108357_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 108357_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:28.76 +20:33:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108677_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 108677_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108778_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 108778_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108789_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 108789_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108794_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 108794_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108997_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
Preparing report for the candidate 108997_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109348_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 109348_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109443_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
Preparing report for the candidate 109443_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109701_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 109701_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:37.19 +22:38:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109766_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 109766_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110022_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 110022_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110779_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 110779_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:49.09 +22:53:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110951_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 110951_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111099_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 111099_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111370_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 111370_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111518_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
Preparing report for the candidate 111518_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111579_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 111579_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111649_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 111649_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111719_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 111719_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111752_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 111752_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111974_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 111974_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112024_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112024_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112042_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112042_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112099_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112099_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112129_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112129_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112132_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112132_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112203_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112203_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112210_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112210_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112222_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112222_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112245_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112245_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112332_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112332_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112338_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112338_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112347_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112347_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112353_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112353_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112389_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112389_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112397_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112397_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112445_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112445_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112471_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112471_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112497_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112497_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112666_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 112666_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.45 +18:37:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20082_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461
The candidate 20082_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks