fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 19.12440 | 2461332.62440 | 10.63 | 21:18:11.82 -24:37:50.5 | 3275 2374 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 19.12498 | 2461332.62498 | 10.59 | 21:18:11.84 -24:37:50.3 | 3271 2380 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.1247 2461332.6247 10.61 21:18:11.83 -24:37:50.4
23.33371 -42.33073 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
349 Dembowska 1 -1 1 10.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:18:11.83 -24:37:50.4: 14.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:18:11.83 -24:37:50.4: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Cap-05-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Cap-05-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing Cap-05-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 371046 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 371046 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.png' -> 'transient_report/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits_preview.png'
Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
renamed 'Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.png' -> 'transient_report/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits_preview.png'
Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2200.0553 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 534.8469 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5131.9205 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1034.1028 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5134.4134 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1038.7851 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.33263 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.005 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 11.7600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 12.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-18T21:58:57.8805469' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-19T02:58:57.8805469' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61332.1242810185 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-19T02:59:07.7821335' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61332.1243956252 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 316.797913951732 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -25.9995326274477 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.0408333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 193.673611111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.05361631870851 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cap-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '21 07 12' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-26 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20662 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20662 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 11.7600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 11.7600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 3.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 57.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 12.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 20.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.100088 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/d_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits :) Spent 0.527205 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/d_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 11.6599998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 12.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-18T21:59:48.1236708' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-19T02:59:48.1236708' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61332.1248625349 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-19T02:59:58.0266052' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61332.1249771528 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 316.797913982105 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -25.9995326135682 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 28.9994444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 193.883333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.05626978351095 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cap-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '21 07 12' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-26 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20662 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20662 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 11.6599998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 11.6599998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 3.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 57.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 12.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 20.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.100088 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/d_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits :) Spent 0.517867 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/d_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461332.62439676 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Image size: 937.0'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 21:07:10.865 -26:00:53.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08 Second-epoch image center 21:07:10.865 -26:00:53.94 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0173 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Image size: 937.0'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 21:07:09.102 -26:00:19.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08 Second-epoch image center 21:07:09.102 -26:00:19.52 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0133 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 21:07:10.865 -26:00:53.94 Second-epoch second image center 21:07:09.102 -26:00:19.52 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01162 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.twwcMOwDE7 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sZkdGOxLhG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z4lsauBvHw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits &> /tmp/tmp.doI1cJumS1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 4103 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7791 to 325.8207 deg, Dec -31.2640 to -20.5569 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7791 to 325.8207 deg, Dec -31.2640 to -20.5569 deg Loaded 7074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2509 out of 2559 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2559 out of 4103 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.363500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.363500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.24 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 4103 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7791 to 325.8207 deg, Dec -31.2640 to -20.5569 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7791 to 325.8207 deg, Dec -31.2640 to -20.5569 deg Loaded 7074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2509 out of 2559 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2559 out of 4103 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (aperture=6.6) Read 4114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7791 to 325.8210 deg, Dec -31.2636 to -20.5567 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7791 to 325.8210 deg, Dec -31.2636 to -20.5567 deg Loaded 7074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2500 out of 2554 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2554 out of 4114 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (aperture=6.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits 2.4 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 2.7 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.2 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits 14.3 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 14.1 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits 14.2 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.twwcMOwDE7 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=324, bad_region=772, passed=4103 Got 4103 stars (including 3074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4103 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3015 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3010 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3010 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3010 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3492 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3017 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3009 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3492 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3009 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3492 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Excluding outliers - 3009 stars left (next iteration limit 3311) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits N_match=3009 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.437 n_q1=1018 n_q2=468 n_q3=1055 n_q4=468 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3009 N_valid=3009 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.805 bias_dec_arcsec=1.468 median_sep_arcsec=3.892 p95_sep_arcsec=7.197 n_q1=1018 n_q2=468 n_q3=1055 n_q4=468 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.sZkdGOxLhG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=328, bad_region=762, passed=4114 Got 4114 stars (including 3090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4114 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3026 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3019 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3019 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3019 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3507 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3027 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3019 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3507 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3019 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3507 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Excluding outliers - 3019 stars left (next iteration limit 3320) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits N_match=3019 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=1044 n_q2=459 n_q3=1056 n_q4=460 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3019 N_valid=3019 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.935 bias_dec_arcsec=1.463 median_sep_arcsec=4.064 p95_sep_arcsec=6.971 n_q1=1044 n_q2=459 n_q3=1056 n_q4=460 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.z4lsauBvHw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=324, bad_region=988, passed=3992 Got 3992 stars (including 2755 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3992 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2687 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2684 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2684 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2684 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3211 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2687 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2684 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3211 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2684 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3211 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 2684 stars left (next iteration limit 2952) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2684 robust_rms=7.345 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.844 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.844 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2684 robust_rms=0.420 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.742 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.742 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2684 robust_rms=0.380 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.613 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.613 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2684 robust_rms_before=0.874 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.400 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.380 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.716 worst_region_rms_after=0.613 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.065 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.613 verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.sip_refit.GnT8FK/candidate.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.sip_refit.GnT8FK/candidate.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 21:07:10.888 -26:00:54.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 3992 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.sip_refit.GnT8FK/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_1615824.cat.log' 'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.sip_refit.GnT8FK/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.Wf35Gz' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_1615824.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.874 -> 0.380 arcsec) SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 2684 pairs from the previous matching) UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2588 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success SIP_REFIT: re-match found 2588 pairs (2684 from the previous matching) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2588 robust_rms=7.336 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.931 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.931 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2588 robust_rms=0.419 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.729 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.729 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2588 robust_rms=0.379 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.613 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.613 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2588 robust_rms_before=0.379 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.379 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.379 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.612 worst_region_rms_after=0.613 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.612 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.613 SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.613 vs 0.612 arcsec) - keeping the current solution SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2588 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3211 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2588 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3210 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits N_match=2588 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=821 n_q2=499 n_q3=792 n_q4=476 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2588 N_valid=2588 bias_ra_arcsec=0.010 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.316 p95_sep_arcsec=1.050 n_q1=821 n_q2=499 n_q3=792 n_q4=476 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.doI1cJumS1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=345, bad_region=993, passed=3947 Got 3947 stars (including 2705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3947 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2640 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2638 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2638 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2638 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3155 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2640 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2638 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3155 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2638 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3155 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 2638 stars left (next iteration limit 2901) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2638 robust_rms=7.280 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.034 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.034 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2638 robust_rms=0.416 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.729 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.729 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2638 robust_rms=0.372 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.594 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.594 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2638 robust_rms_before=0.869 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.390 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.372 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.735 worst_region_rms_after=0.594 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.031 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.594 verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.sip_refit.KgzR8b/candidate.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.sip_refit.KgzR8b/candidate.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 21:07:09.120 -26:00:19.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 3947 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.sip_refit.KgzR8b/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_1615821.cat.log' 'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.sip_refit.KgzR8b/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.3YevQo' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_1615821.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.869 -> 0.372 arcsec) SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 2638 pairs from the previous matching) UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2548 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success SIP_REFIT: re-match found 2548 pairs (2638 from the previous matching) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2548 robust_rms=7.277 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.653 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.653 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2548 robust_rms=0.417 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.725 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.725 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2548 robust_rms=0.371 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.588 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.588 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2548 robust_rms_before=0.371 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.371 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.371 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.587 worst_region_rms_after=0.588 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.587 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.588 SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.588 vs 0.587 arcsec) - keeping the current solution SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2548 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3155 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2548 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3155 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits N_match=2548 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.442 n_q1=796 n_q2=507 n_q3=774 n_q4=471 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2548 N_valid=2548 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.309 p95_sep_arcsec=1.036 n_q1=796 n_q2=507 n_q3=774 n_q4=471 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits sigma_overall=0.463 worst_q_ratio=1.131 ref2=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits sigma_overall=0.502 worst_q_ratio=1.159 new1=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.130 new2=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits sigma_overall=0.392 worst_q_ratio=1.127 reference average sigma_overall=0.4825 worst_q_ratio=1.145 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224_astrometric_residuals.png (3009 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225_astrometric_residuals.png (3019 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148_astrometric_residuals.png (2588 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149_astrometric_residuals.png (2548 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:13:57.64 -26:28:42.8: 11.36 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:18:11.83 -24:37:50.4: 14.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:11:04.97 -26:26:33.1: 11.19 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:05:27.37 -24:06:38.3: 11.64 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:14:54.43 -26:32:28.5: 11.22 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:11:04.97 -26:26:33.1: 11.18 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:13:57.64 -26:28:42.8: 11.38 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:05:27.37 -24:06:38.3: 11.67 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:14:54.43 -26:32:28.5: 11.25 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:18:11.83 -24:37:50.4: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.19 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:04.97 -26:26:33.1: ref_mag=11.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1719 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:57.64 -26:28:42.8: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1407 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:27.37 -24:06:38.3: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1055 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:54.43 -26:32:28.5: ref_mag=11.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1984 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20597.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20348_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 20348_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 21:07:36.66 -23:55:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20597_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 Preparing report for the candidate 20597_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20803_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 20803_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 9.59 21:07:36.66 -23:55:14.6 4726 1935 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 19.12440 2461332.62440 11.13 21:05:27.37 -24:06:38.3 5027 2045 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20805_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 20805_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 11.08 21:05:27.37 -24:06:38.4 5023 2050 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 19.12440 2461332.62440 11.14 21:13:57.63 -26:28:42.8 3872 3481 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20823_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 20823_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 11.14 21:13:57.65 -26:28:42.8 3868 3487 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 19.12440 2461332.62440 11.17 21:11:04.95 -26:26:33.0 4261 3455 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20827_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 20827_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 11.17 21:11:04.98 -26:26:33.2 4257 3461 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 19.12440 2461332.62440 11.18 21:14:54.43 -26:32:28.5 3744 3521 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01403_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 01403_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 11.21 21:14:54.44 -26:32:28.5 3740 3527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits **** FOUND 20:54:26.56 -27:44:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 00533_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 00533_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 9.95 20:54:26.56 -27:44:15.2 6491 4263 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits **** FOUND 21:26:44.02 -29:51:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 21:18:11.83 -24:37:50.4 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 21:07:10.888 -26:00:54.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08 Second-epoch image center 21:07:10.888 -26:00:54.42 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0174 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 21:07:09.120 -26:00:19.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08 Second-epoch image center 21:07:09.120 -26:00:19.99 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0133 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 21:07:10.888 -26:00:54.42 Second-epoch second image center 21:07:09.120 -26:00:19.99 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01163 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5d0egtaCP0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LBzBHxu8Lv Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IH1MjMKxTZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cU3EVflIVx Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_ Discovery image 3 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 8.91 21:26:44.02 -29:51:04.4 2209 5580 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits .fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 30382 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7565 to 325.8970 deg, Dec -31.2695 to -20.5327 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7565 to 325.8970 deg, Dec -31.2695 to -20.5327 deg Loaded 7141 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4303 out of 4524 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4524 out of 30382 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.175900 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.175900 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.42 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 30382 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7565 to 325.8970 deg, Dec -31.2695 to -20.5327 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7565 to 325.8970 deg, Dec -31.2695 to -20.5327 deg Loaded 7141 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4303 out of 4524 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4524 out of 30382 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 30781 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7566 to 325.8990 deg, Dec -31.2689 to -20.5327 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7566 to 325.8990 deg, Dec -31.2689 to -20.5327 deg Loaded 7140 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4271 out of 4495 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4495 out of 30781 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (aperture=4.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits 2.1 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.4 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits 14.4 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.5d0egtaCP0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1095, bad_region=5151, passed=30372 Got 30372 stars (including 24291 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30372 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26496 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26496 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26496 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5372) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.421 n_q1=1672 n_q2=798 n_q3=1567 n_q4=848 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.202 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4885 N_valid=4885 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.676 bias_dec_arcsec=1.489 median_sep_arcsec=3.686 p95_sep_arcsec=6.932 n_q1=1672 n_q2=798 n_q3=1567 n_q4=848 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.LBzBHxu8Lv (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1095, bad_region=5253, passed=30767 Got 30767 stars (including 24584 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30767 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26810 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26810 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26810 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5374) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits N_match=4887 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.457 n_q1=1684 n_q2=796 n_q3=1563 n_q4=844 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4887 N_valid=4887 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.774 bias_dec_arcsec=1.474 median_sep_arcsec=3.881 p95_sep_arcsec=6.778 n_q1=1684 n_q2=796 n_q3=1563 n_q4=844 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.IH1MjMKxTZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1108, bad_region=4136, passed=23926 Got 23926 stars (including 19153 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23926 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20813 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20813 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20813 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=7.193 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.042 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.042 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.442 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.693 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.693 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.400 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.595 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.595 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4855 robust_rms_before=0.402 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.407 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.400 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.599 worst_region_rms_after=0.595 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.599 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.595 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.599 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.599 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.402 arcsec matched=4855 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=1603 n_q2=900 n_q3=1490 n_q4=862 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4855 N_valid=4855 bias_ra_arcsec=0.013 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.333 p95_sep_arcsec=1.112 n_q1=1603 n_q2=900 n_q3=1490 n_q4=862 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.cU3EVflIVx (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1224, bad_region=4257, passed=24568 Got 24568 stars (including 19689 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24568 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21368 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21368 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21368 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=7.168 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.034 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.034 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.442 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.668 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.668 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.401 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.566 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.566 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4855 robust_rms_before=0.403 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.405 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.401 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.572 worst_region_rms_after=0.566 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.572 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.566 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.572 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.572 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.403 arcsec matched=4855 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.441 n_q1=1606 n_q2=893 n_q3=1490 n_q4=866 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4855 N_valid=4855 bias_ra_arcsec=0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.010 median_sep_arcsec=0.333 p95_sep_arcsec=1.145 n_q1=1606 n_q2=893 n_q3=1490 n_q4=866 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:11:35.40 -24:02:13.3: 13.68 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:06:56.93 -24:59:33.4: 10.82 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:12:59.03 -22:49:33.2: 13.34 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:59:42.10 -23:51:50.8: 13.23 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:22:29.00 -25:09:53.1: 13.69 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:53:19.45 -25:03:40.0: 13.38 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:54:56.22 -22:18:29.7: 12.20 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:58:08.08 -22:58:00.1: 13.12 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:56:53.30 -27:11:28.6: 13.40 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:22:29.00 -25:09:53.1: 13.60 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:53:19.45 -25:03:40.0: 13.43 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:58:08.08 -22:58:00.1: 13.38 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:12:59.03 -22:49:33.2: 13.44 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:54:56.22 -22:18:29.7: 12.16 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:06:56.93 -24:59:33.4: 10.82 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:11:35.40 -24:02:13.3: 13.91 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:59:42.10 -23:51:50.8: 13.09 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:19.45 -25:03:40.0: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4857 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:06:56.93 -24:59:33.4: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8120 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:56.22 -22:18:29.7: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4888 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:08.08 -22:58:00.1: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5298 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:29.00 -25:09:53.1: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4519 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:59.03 -22:49:33.2: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4145 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:35.40 -24:02:13.3: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6845 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:42.10 -23:51:50.8: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4214 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:23:13.90 -30:02:21.5: 14.04 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:56:53.30 -27:11:28.6: 13.30 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:53.30 -27:11:28.6: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4548 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:23:13.90 -30:02:21.5: 13.93 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:23:13.90 -30:02:21.5: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6810 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:02:34.85 -24:15:19.0: 14.13 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:22:51.73 -30:12:35.8: 14.08 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:05:06.57 -29:47:04.9: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:05:06.57 -29:47:04.9: 14.16 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:22:51.73 -30:12:35.8: 13.94 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:02:34.85 -24:15:19.0: 14.29 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.22 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:06.57 -29:47:04.9: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=13.7697 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:34.85 -24:15:19.0: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7150 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:51.73 -30:12:35.8: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7298 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52305_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 52305_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 10 19.12440 2461332.62440 13.40 21:12:59.03 -22:49:32.9 3980 1270 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52703_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 52703_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 13.43 21:12:59.03 -22:49:33.5 3976 1276 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits **** FOUND 21:18:11.82 -24:37:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52786_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 52786_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 10.61 21:18:11.82 -24:37:50.3 3271 2380 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 19.12440 2461332.62440 10.80 21:06:56.93 -24:59:33.3 4821 2577 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54202_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 54202_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 10.83 21:06:56.93 -24:59:33.4 4817 2583 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 19.12440 2461332.62440 12.49 20:54:56.27 -22:18:30.1 6507 0968 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55110_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 55110_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 12.49 20:54:56.18 -22:18:29.4 6503 0974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits **** FOUND 20:51:40.42 -26:55:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56234_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 56234_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 12.83 20:51:40.44 -26:55:22.4 6877 3781 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 19.12440 2461332.62440 13.41 20:53:19.51 -25:03:40.0 6688 2643 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56324_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 56324_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 13.60 20:53:19.40 -25:03:40.0 6684 2648 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 19.12440 2461332.62440 13.50 21:22:29.04 -25:09:53.3 2693 2711 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56456_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 56456_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 13.42 21:22:28.96 -25:09:52.8 2689 2717 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 19.12440 2461332.62440 13.54 20:59:42.06 -23:51:51.6 5824 1902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56486_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 56486_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 13.34 20:59:42.14 -23:51:49.9 5820 1907 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 19.12440 2461332.62440 13.59 21:11:35.37 -24:02:13.7 4181 2002 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56525_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 56525_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 13.82 21:11:35.44 -24:02:13.0 4176 2008 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 19.12440 2461332.62440 13.57 20:58:08.10 -22:57:59.0 6051 1360 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56630_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 56630_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 13.50 20:58:08.06 -22:58:01.2 6047 1367 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits **** FOUND 20:53:37.12 -27:20:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56685_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 56685_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 13.50 20:53:37.13 -27:20:11.4 6608 4023 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 19.12440 2461332.62440 13.53 20:56:53.36 -27:11:29.7 6173 3920 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56826_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 56826_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 13.41 20:56:53.23 -27:11:27.6 6169 3925 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 19.12440 2461332.62440 13.66 21:23:13.94 -30:02:22.4 2680 5670 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56840_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 56840_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 13.70 21:23:13.86 -30:02:20.7 2676 5675 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 19.12440 2461332.62440 13.70 21:02:34.89 -24:15:19.2 5423 2134 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56873_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 56873_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 13.73 21:02:34.80 -24:15:18.8 5419 2140 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 19.12440 2461332.62440 13.77 21:05:06.62 -29:47:04.2 5061 5476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56926_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 56926_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 13.77 21:05:06.51 -29:47:05.6 5057 5482 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 19.12440 2461332.62440 13.72 21:22:51.75 -30:12:35.1 2731 5771 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-58-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 28924_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 28924_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 13.74 21:22:51.70 -30:12:36.6 2728 5778 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits **** FOUND 21:07:36.65 -23:55:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 09162_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 09162_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 9.74 21:07:36.64 -23:55:14.8 4726 1935 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits **** FOUND 20:54:26.54 -27:44:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 03065_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 03065_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 9.88 20:54:26.54 -27:44:15.2 6491 4263 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits **** FOUND 21:26:44.00 -29:51:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 21:18:11.83 -24:37:50.4 ########### Completed Cap-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 21:18:11.83 -24:37:50.4 ################################################################################### 21:18:11.83 -24:37:50.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461332.62439676 -observatory V36 15:02:37.95 -20:33:05.4 Mercury (0.2mag) 13:54:07.84 -19:23:27.2 Venus (-4.2mag) 08:57:27.06 +18:36:57.5 Mars (1.0mag) 09:39:07.00 +14:43:18.8 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:40:16.24 +01:23:25.6 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:11:11.90 +20:55:42.9 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:09:36.70 -00:30:17.9 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:09.64 -23:43:15.0 Pluto (14.5mag) 20:10:39.55 -23:06:25.6 Moon (-10.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 18 22:44 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461332.62439676: 09:39:10.20 +14:43:01.5 Io (6.1mag) 09:39:16.08 +14:42:29.7 Europa (6.2mag) 09:39:24.25 +14:41:42.4 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:39:36.12 +14:40:38.7 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:39:26.49 +15:01:11.1 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:39:11.02 +14:42:58.0 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:38:03.79 +15:06:33.3 Elara (17.5mag) 09:41:02.61 +14:06:57.3 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:37:10.40 +15:12:14.6 Carme (18.8mag) 00:40:27.00 +01:22:58.9 Titan (8.2mag) 00:40:17.43 +01:23:06.6 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:40:05.54 +01:21:07.5 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:40:28.63 +01:22:50.5 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:38:32.35 +01:11:00.5 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 18 22:44 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461332.62439676: 03:34:11.96 +20:33:47.9 JWST 16:42:08.54 +44:46:05.6 Chandra 10:10:26.37 -56:19:58.3 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 18 22:44 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461332.62439676 -observatory V36 03:43:11.39 +20:11:09.0 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:40:07.41 +37:22:34.7 18.0mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 18:31:57.33 -33:18:21.4 14.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:42:32.18 -72:54:43.7 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:14:47.65 +34:52:31.5 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:46:29.16 +48:21:05.0 17.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:32:49.48 +25:23:32.8 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:05:09.56 +36:31:55.4 16.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:29:01.83 +41:13:06.5 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:46:08.57 -13:39:29.0 16.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:31:45.53 +15:21:48.2 16.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:58:54.61 -03:21:44.7 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 19:14:25.25 +61:48:58.9 15.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:27:20.55 +42:04:40.3 17.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:53:05.00 +15:04:43.3 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:27:05.15 -46:01:51.3 13.3mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 00:07:22.39 +17:40:06.4 17.3mag 2P/Encke 23:07:07.31 -29:52:41.4 14.8mag 10P/Tempel 02:21:13.33 +36:57:53.1 16.6mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:16:22.32 -08:47:40.2 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:17:45.20 -09:02:40.2 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 07:45:25.13 +15:10:53.3 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 02:51:52.72 +13:56:13.5 17.8mag 88P/Howell 08:07:00.13 +42:21:08.4 17.0mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:20:08.30 +11:20:13.5 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:56:45.15 +11:29:33.2 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 14:26:26.52 -34:20:39.0 17.9mag 124P/Mrkos 20:45:20.98 +08:40:48.2 9.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:37:34.96 -00:06:05.5 15.0mag 169P/NEAT 03:24:17.13 +03:39:20.1 15.0mag 220P/McNaught 06:13:36.60 +46:51:42.8 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 07:38:25.05 +25:25:08.4 17.8mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Oct 18 22:44 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 18 22:44 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 18 22:44 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 21:03:26.516 -27:11:33.79 AT 2026adnk 2026-08-09.38 20.89 19:52:57.783 -30:08:02.85 AT 2026adnj 2026-08-09.35 20.47 00:19:25.338 -09:01:03.19 AT 2026adni 2026-08-08.57 20.68 00:43:29.529 -16:04:19.62 AT 2026adnh 2026-08-08.57 21.42 17:10:50.126 +30:40:20.97 AT 2026adng 2026-08-08.34 20.94 00:07:00.875 -12:25:24.80 AT 2026adnf 2026-08-08.56 20.96 00:39:29.740 -14:56:48.57 AT 2026adne 2026-08-08.57 20.02 22:04:57.798 +18:06:30.64 AT 2026adnd 2026-08-09.40 21.68 23:03:23.262 -02:49:15.81 AT 2026adnc 2026-08-08.51 20.9 20:48:20.597 -33:38:16.53 AT 2026adnb 2026-08-07.38 20.17 20:53:17.398 -34:06:20.25 AT 2026adna 2026-08-07.38 20.59 15:56:25.668 +01:40:14.08 AT 2026admz 2026-08-07.29 21.56 07:26:42.506 +20:41:38.22 AT 2026admy 2026-09-16.61 20.28 02:34:08.709 -31:43:40.13 AT 2026admx 2026-09-16.51 20.92 21:54:12.047 -21:31:26.01 AT 2026admw 2026-09-13.33 20.91 05:01:22.922 +11:52:38.43 AT 2026admv 2026-09-15.59 21.31 23:22:19.539 -19:37:35.58 AT 2026admu 2026-09-15.42 20.86 03:48:08.246 +05:47:12.38 AT 2026admt 2026-09-15.59 20.75 17:24:43.104 +20:58:42.71 AT 2026adms 2026-09-16.24 20.62 19:07:12.210 -03:18:19.43 AT 2026admr 2026-09-29.13 19.4 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 18 22:44 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 3 2026 10 19.12498 2461332.62498 8.88 21:26:44.00 -29:51:04.2 2209 5580 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_224226_TTUQ2b1x1_1608322_VSNiPeBf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_21-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
