This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 18.2123 2461331.7123 11.62 23:03:41.71 -04:57:34.2
68.94599 -56.08725 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.236 Honoria -0 -0 0 11.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:03:41.71 -04:57:34.2: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:03:41.71 -04:57:34.2: 15.59 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.59 +/- 0.34
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461331.7123,11.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261018.2123 11.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 18.2123 2461331.7123 12.83 23:25:42.98 -05:34:29.1
75.66878 -60.32343 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.317 Roxane -0 -0 0 12.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:25:42.98 -05:34:29.1: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:25:42.98 -05:34:29.1: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461331.7123,12.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261018.2123 12.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 18.2123 2461331.7123 12.84 22:56:54.00 +02:04:28.6
74.99539 -49.82866 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.338 Budrosa -0 0 0 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:56:54.00 +02:04:28.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:56:54.00 +02:04:28.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461331.7123,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261018.2123 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 18.2123 2461331.7123 13.60 23:15:18.73 -02:54:06.1
75.29273 -56.60404 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.570 Kythera 0 0 0 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:18.73 -02:54:06.1: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:18.73 -02:54:06.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461331.7123,13.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261018.2123 13.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 18.2123 2461331.7123 13.65 23:12:22.75 -01:58:44.7
75.39111 -55.42724 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.328 Gudrun -0 0 0 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:12:22.75 -01:58:44.7: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:12:22.75 -01:58:44.7: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461331.7123,13.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261018.2123 13.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 18.2123 2461331.7123 13.78 23:11:26.02 -05:03:19.0
71.29464 -57.52635 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.788 Hohensteina -0 -0 1 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:11:26.02 -05:03:19.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:11:26.02 -05:03:19.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461331.7123,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261018.2123 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 18.2123 2461331.7123 14.52 23:09:16.52 -02:10:10.6
74.15172 -55.05528 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.673 Edda -1 -0 1 14.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:09:16.52 -02:10:10.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:09:16.52 -02:10:10.6: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461331.7123,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261018.2123 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 18.2123 2461331.7123 14.62 23:31:50.09 -05:07:53.0
78.63359 -60.95875 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.223 Rosa 0 -0 0 14.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:50.09 -05:07:53.0: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:50.09 -05:07:53.0: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461331.7123,14.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261018.2123 14.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461331.71255404 18.10.2026 05:05:54.669 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5093
Objects passed selection criteria: 5091
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4900.75
Average stars matched: 4733.75 (96.5924 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232380 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 18 00:29:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461331.71255404 18.10.2026 05:05:54.669 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 129
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.06
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29602
Objects passed selection criteria: 29521
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 28914.2
Average stars matched: 27288.8 (94.3782 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 254232 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 18 00:30:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461331.71202611
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:35.008 -01:59:50.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:35.008 -01:59:50.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0105 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:37.778 -02:00:02.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:37.778 -02:00:02.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0151 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:35.008 -01:59:50.66
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:37.778 -02:00:02.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01201 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pqJnPHFMor
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t5EPALhGfY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aMkmR7vRAu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hx1oNGIvnA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.655300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.655300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to +3.2517 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to 3.2517 deg
Loaded 4385 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3695 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
2.2 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
2.3 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.pqJnPHFMor (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, bad_region=1637, passed=6415
Got 6415 stars (including 4478 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4346 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4337 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4337 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4337 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4346 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4338 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4338 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4338 stars left (next iteration limit 4770)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits N_match=4338 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1429 n_q2=758 n_q3=1353 n_q4=798 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.040
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4338 N_valid=4338 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.006 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.252 p95_sep_arcsec=0.845 n_q1=1429 n_q2=758 n_q3=1353 n_q4=798 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.t5EPALhGfY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, bad_region=1607, passed=6260
Got 6260 stars (including 4361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4238 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4238 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4230 stars left (next iteration limit 4653)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits N_match=4230 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=1416 n_q2=724 n_q3=1303 n_q4=787 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4230 N_valid=4230 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.297 p95_sep_arcsec=0.953 n_q1=1416 n_q2=724 n_q3=1303 n_q4=787 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aMkmR7vRAu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=398, bad_region=1768, passed=6918
Got 6918 stars (including 4819 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6918 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4680 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4672 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4672 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4680 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4672 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4672 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4672 stars left (next iteration limit 5139)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4672 robust_rms=7.928 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.235 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.235 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4672 robust_rms=0.466 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.855 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.855 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4672 robust_rms=0.302 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.360 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.360 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4672 robust_rms_before=0.986 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.301 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.302 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.333 worst_region_rms_after=0.360 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.078 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.360
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.333 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.333 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.301 arcsec matched=4672
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits N_match=4672 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1537 n_q2=844 n_q3=1420 n_q4=871 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.057
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4672 N_valid=4672 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.564 bias_dec_arcsec=0.563 median_sep_arcsec=0.916 p95_sep_arcsec=1.777 n_q1=1537 n_q2=844 n_q3=1420 n_q4=871 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hx1oNGIvnA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=413, bad_region=1774, passed=6946
Got 6946 stars (including 4833 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6946 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4691 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4685 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4685 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4685 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5507 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4691 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4685 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5507 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4685 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5507 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4685 stars left (next iteration limit 5153)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4685 robust_rms=7.925 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.484 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.484 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4685 robust_rms=0.436 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.824 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.824 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4685 robust_rms=0.309 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.354 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.354 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4685 robust_rms_before=0.978 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.318 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.309 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.356 worst_region_rms_after=0.354 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.034 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.354
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.356 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.318 arcsec matched=4685
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits N_match=4685 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=1552 n_q2=849 n_q3=1418 n_q4=866 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.045
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4685 N_valid=4685 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.574 bias_dec_arcsec=0.560 median_sep_arcsec=0.921 p95_sep_arcsec=1.722 n_q1=1552 n_q2=849 n_q3=1418 n_q4=866 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits sigma_overall=0.314 worst_q_ratio=1.040
ref2=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.063
new1=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits sigma_overall=0.318 worst_q_ratio=1.057
new2=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits sigma_overall=0.330 worst_q_ratio=1.045
reference average sigma_overall=0.3465 worst_q_ratio=1.0515
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017_astrometric_residuals.png (4338 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018_astrometric_residuals.png (4230 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274_astrometric_residuals.png (4672 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275_astrometric_residuals.png (4685 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:21:26.75 -03:04:03.2: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:59:24.09 -02:53:06.2: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:14:35.85 -02:04:12.7: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:01:08.69 -01:13:12.8: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:03:41.71 -04:57:34.2: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:07:13.54 -01:29:21.2: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:53:33.58 -02:17:35.8: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:01:58.98 +00:24:24.9: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:07:13.54 -01:29:21.2: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:01:58.98 +00:24:24.9: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:14:35.85 -02:04:12.7: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:59:24.09 -02:53:06.2: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:53:33.58 -02:17:35.8: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:03:41.71 -04:57:34.2: 15.59 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:01:08.69 -01:13:12.8: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:21:26.75 -03:04:03.2: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:58.98 +00:24:24.9: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9813 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.59 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:07:13.54 -01:29:21.2: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0661 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:59:24.09 -02:53:06.2: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0645 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:14:35.85 -02:04:12.7: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1882 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:53:33.58 -02:17:35.8: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1513 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:26.75 -03:04:03.2: ref_mag=11.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7960 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:03:41.71 -04:57:34.2: ref_mag=15.59 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=11.6193 delta=3.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:08.69 -01:13:12.8: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1731 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20214.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20214_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 20214_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20216_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 20216_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20217_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 20217_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20218_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 20218_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20219_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 20219_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20221_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 20221_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20222_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 20222_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20223_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 20223_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:03:41.71 -04:57:34.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:35.008 -01:59:50.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:35.008 -01:59:50.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0105 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:37.778 -02:00:02.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:37.778 -02:00:02.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0151 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:35.008 -01:59:50.66
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:37.778 -02:00:02.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01201 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uClYjeAW2L
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9m36f039rC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FmXr0EVgZV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5gJBCUtM29
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 35879 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to +3.2602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to 3.2602 deg
Loaded 4394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3893 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3893 out of 35879 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.537600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.537600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.06
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 35879 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to +3.2602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to 3.2602 deg
Loaded 4394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3893 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3893 out of 35879 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 36137 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2724 to 355.0227 deg, Dec -7.2779 to +3.2557 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2724 to 355.0227 deg, Dec -7.2779 to 3.2557 deg
Loaded 4393 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3594 out of 3890 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3890 out of 36137 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 78 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
2.1 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
15.5 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uClYjeAW2L (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1717, bad_region=7702, passed=35853
Got 35853 stars (including 26731 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35853 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5337)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits N_match=4852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1558 n_q2=904 n_q3=1485 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.048
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4852 N_valid=4852 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.018 bias_dec_arcsec=0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.253 p95_sep_arcsec=0.814 n_q1=1558 n_q2=904 n_q3=1485 n_q4=905 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9m36f039rC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=8, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1465, bad_region=7825, passed=36110
Got 36110 stars (including 27137 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36110 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5339)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=1577 n_q2=898 n_q3=1478 n_q4=901 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4854 N_valid=4854 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.023 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.299 p95_sep_arcsec=0.921 n_q1=1577 n_q2=898 n_q3=1478 n_q4=901 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FmXr0EVgZV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1681, bad_region=7294, passed=37305
Got 37305 stars (including 28777 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37305 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4812 stars left (next iteration limit 5293)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4812 robust_rms=7.580 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.200 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.200 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4812 robust_rms=0.451 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.066 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.066 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4812 robust_rms=0.299 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.369 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.369 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4812 robust_rms_before=0.995 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.299 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.347 worst_region_rms_after=0.369 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.083 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.369
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.347 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.347 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.297 arcsec matched=4812
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits N_match=4812 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=1582 n_q2=872 n_q3=1480 n_q4=878 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.068
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4812 N_valid=4812 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.567 bias_dec_arcsec=0.566 median_sep_arcsec=0.920 p95_sep_arcsec=1.772 n_q1=1582 n_q2=872 n_q3=1480 n_q4=878 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5gJBCUtM29 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1693, bad_region=7285, passed=37446
Got 37446 stars (including 28931 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37446 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4811 stars left (next iteration limit 5292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4811 robust_rms=7.583 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.008 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.008 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4811 robust_rms=0.422 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.922 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.922 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4811 robust_rms=0.306 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.361 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.361 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4811 robust_rms_before=0.988 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.313 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.306 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.360 worst_region_rms_after=0.361 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.043 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.361
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.360 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.360 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.313 arcsec matched=4811
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits N_match=4811 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1585 n_q2=873 n_q3=1477 n_q4=876 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.059
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4811 N_valid=4811 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.584 bias_dec_arcsec=0.559 median_sep_arcsec=0.924 p95_sep_arcsec=1.719 n_q1=1585 n_q2=873 n_q3=1477 n_q4=876 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_002728_TTUQ2b1x1_2405019_XTcT8CNy/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:59:25.43 -00:31:47.6: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:21.01 -04:43:14.2: 14.35 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:56:54.00 +02:04:28.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:33:02.65 +01:48:13.7: 14.55 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:24:26.42 +00:13:26.0: 15.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:25:42.98 -05:34:29.1: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:16.37 -04:31:20.0: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:07.71 +01:32:12.7: 14.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:57:22.19 -06:11:43.5: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:26:38.13 -05:12:46.3: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:16.37 -04:31:20.0: 14.10 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:33:02.65 +01:48:13.7: 14.50 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:57:22.19 -06:11:43.5: 14.36 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:25:42.98 -05:34:29.1: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:21.01 -04:43:14.2: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:07.71 +01:32:12.7: 14.55 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:59:25.43 -00:31:47.6: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:24:26.42 +00:13:26.0: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:56:54.00 +02:04:28.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:57:22.19 -06:11:43.5: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5018 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:16.37 -04:31:20.0: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9119 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:59:25.43 -00:31:47.6: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4465 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:21.01 -04:43:14.2: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6140 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:26.42 +00:13:26.0: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7636 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:07.71 +01:32:12.7: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7294 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:02.65 +01:48:13.7: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3168 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:26:38.13 -05:12:46.3: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:26:38.13 -05:12:46.3: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0540 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:18.73 -02:54:06.1: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:24:17.19 -06:14:04.4: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:12:22.75 -01:58:44.7: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:06.27 +00:02:55.2: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:39.22 -02:16:31.1: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:11:26.02 -05:03:19.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:09:16.52 -02:10:10.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:25:44.92 +01:00:50.9: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:18.73 -02:54:06.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:12:22.75 -01:58:44.7: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:11:26.02 -05:03:19.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:39.22 -02:16:31.1: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:06.27 +00:02:55.2: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:24:17.19 -06:14:04.4: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:39.22 -02:16:31.1: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3284 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:06.27 +00:02:55.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0498 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:17.19 -06:14:04.4: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4089 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:09:16.52 -02:10:10.6: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:25:44.92 +01:00:50.9: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:44.92 +01:00:50.9: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5849 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:23:59.07 +00:39:24.8: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:03.18 -06:06:09.8: 14.93 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:45.97 -06:08:44.1: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:43.53 -02:57:42.7: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:23:59.07 +00:39:24.8: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:03.18 -06:06:09.8: 15.27 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:45.97 -06:08:44.1: 14.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:23:59.07 +00:39:24.8: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4756 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:45.97 -06:08:44.1: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5047 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:03.18 -06:06:09.8: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.5533 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:43.53 -02:57:42.7: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:43.53 -02:57:42.7: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5514 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:24.08 -05:55:30.3: 14.42 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:45.53 -00:31:12.1: 14.55 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:12.26 -03:02:20.0: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:53.41 -01:23:38.4: 15.05 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:24.08 -05:55:30.3: 14.90 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:24.08 -05:55:30.3: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5985 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:45.53 -00:31:12.1: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:12.26 -03:02:20.0: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:45.53 -00:31:12.1: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5306 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:12.26 -03:02:20.0: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4217 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:53.41 -01:23:38.4: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:53.41 -01:23:38.4: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5515 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:32.46 -01:44:27.4: 14.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:14:34.28 +02:10:30.2: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:31.67 -05:40:00.4: 14.69 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:30:36.61 -04:15:45.4: 15.26 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:32.46 -01:44:27.4: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:14:34.28 +02:10:30.2: 14.63 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:32.46 -01:44:27.4: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6302 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:14:34.28 +02:10:30.2: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.6233 delta=-0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:31.67 -05:40:00.4: 15.03 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:31.67 -05:40:00.4: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6924 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:30:36.61 -04:15:45.4: 15.08 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:36.61 -04:15:45.4: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5934 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:50.54 +00:02:18.9: 15.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:36:05.29 -03:08:49.2: 14.98 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:52.00 -02:12:51.7: 14.93 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:56.87 +00:22:55.7: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:50.54 +00:02:18.9: 14.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:36:05.29 -03:08:49.2: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:50.54 +00:02:18.9: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6565 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:05.29 -03:08:49.2: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6335 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:52.00 -02:12:51.7: 15.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:52.00 -02:12:51.7: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6720 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:56.87 +00:22:55.7: 15.15 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:56.87 +00:22:55.7: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7301 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:31.64 -03:41:18.3: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:29.47 -04:53:30.8: 15.08 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:33:50.99 +01:58:59.6: 15.13 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:30:00.51 +00:44:34.5: 15.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:31.64 -03:41:18.3: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:31.64 -03:41:18.3: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7332 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:29.47 -04:53:30.8: 14.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:29.47 -04:53:30.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6806 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:33:50.99 +01:58:59.6: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:50.99 +01:58:59.6: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6641 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:30:00.51 +00:44:34.5: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:00.51 +00:44:34.5: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6602 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:55.98 +00:18:38.2: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:25.57 -05:14:29.5: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:38.05 -05:46:32.3: 14.85 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:35.02 -01:39:03.0: 15.18 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:25.57 -05:14:29.5: 15.06 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:55.98 +00:18:38.2: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:25.57 -05:14:29.5: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7110 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:55.98 +00:18:38.2: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8047 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:38.05 -05:46:32.3: 15.39 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:38.05 -05:46:32.3: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.5935 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:35.02 -01:39:03.0: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:35.02 -01:39:03.0: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6966 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:33:28.79 -01:59:00.4: 14.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:12.02 -03:17:10.1: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:18.06 -02:26:37.4: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:05.45 -02:19:28.9: 14.86 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:33:28.79 -01:59:00.4: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:12.02 -03:17:10.1: 15.05 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:28.79 -01:59:00.4: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7262 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:12.02 -03:17:10.1: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8145 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:18.06 -02:26:37.4: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:18.06 -02:26:37.4: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7517 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:05.45 -02:19:28.9: 15.17 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:05.45 -02:19:28.9: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7234 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:22:20.49 -05:25:51.3: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:50.09 -05:07:53.0: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:51.61 -03:17:39.3: 15.45 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:32.84 -06:01:42.1: 14.95 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:50.09 -05:07:53.0: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:51.61 -03:17:39.3: 15.45 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:32.84 -06:01:42.1: 14.84 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:22:20.49 -05:25:51.3: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.45 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:22:20.49 -05:25:51.3: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8117 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:51.61 -03:17:39.3: ref_mag=15.45 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.8371 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:32.84 -06:01:42.1: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6511 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:21.70 -01:06:23.1: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:43.28 -04:27:17.6: 15.23 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:25:01.83 -06:04:51.3: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:58:38.38 -03:01:28.2: 15.49 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:21.70 -01:06:23.1: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:21.70 -01:06:23.1: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6658 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:43.28 -04:27:17.6: 15.28 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:23:38.45 -04:59:01.7: 15.25 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:43.28 -04:27:17.6: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8382 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:25:01.83 -06:04:51.3: 14.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:01.83 -06:04:51.3: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7406 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:58:38.38 -03:01:28.2: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:58:38.38 -03:01:28.2: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7523 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:58.25 +01:58:23.1: 14.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:23:38.45 -04:59:01.7: 15.12 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:23:38.45 -04:59:01.7: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7873 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:27.88 +00:59:43.5: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:58.25 +01:58:23.1: 15.17 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:58.25 +01:58:23.1: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8462 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:33:49.04 -00:45:37.1: 15.35 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:02:11.17 -05:57:34.8: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:30:43.84 +01:53:13.0: 15.43 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:33:16.17 -02:10:46.3: 14.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:47.98 -01:06:19.2: 14.61 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:26:56.13 -06:09:16.9: 15.54 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:27.88 +00:59:43.5: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:27.88 +00:59:43.5: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7117 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:33:49.04 -00:45:37.1: 15.48 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:49.04 -00:45:37.1: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.8497 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:19.97 +00:24:57.8: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:02:11.17 -05:57:34.8: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:30:43.84 +01:53:13.0: 15.14 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:33:16.17 -02:10:46.3: 14.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:02:11.17 -05:57:34.8: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8023 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:16.17 -02:10:46.3: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8339 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:43.84 +01:53:13.0: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8027 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:47.98 -01:06:19.2: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:47.98 -01:06:19.2: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6748 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:08.91 -02:58:18.0: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:26:56.13 -06:09:16.9: 14.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:26:56.13 -06:09:16.9: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9145 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:19.97 +00:24:57.8: 15.17 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:19.97 +00:24:57.8: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9045 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:08.91 -02:58:18.0: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:59.39 +00:11:48.2: 15.13 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:08.91 -02:58:18.0: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8749 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:17:12.04 -05:33:09.7: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:16:25.88 -03:24:07.3: 14.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:00.03 -04:55:36.9: 15.21 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:25:56.71 -04:14:16.8: 15.14 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:10:54.68 -06:00:24.4: 15.25 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:23:48.33 -06:03:36.8: 14.98 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:59.39 +00:11:48.2: 15.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:59.39 +00:11:48.2: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8661 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:17:12.04 -05:33:09.7: 15.26 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:16:25.88 -03:24:07.3: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:17:12.04 -05:33:09.7: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8654 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:18:41.30 +02:01:12.2: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:00.03 -04:55:36.9: 15.08 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:25:56.71 -04:14:16.8: 15.39 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:16:25.88 -03:24:07.3: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7194 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:10:54.68 -06:00:24.4: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:56.71 -04:14:16.8: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8257 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:00.03 -04:55:36.9: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8979 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:10:54.68 -06:00:24.4: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7964 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:06:57.09 -05:37:40.2: 15.27 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:23:48.33 -06:03:36.8: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:23:48.33 -06:03:36.8: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8440 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:18:41.30 +02:01:12.2: 15.47 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:18:41.30 +02:01:12.2: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9065 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:06:57.09 -05:37:40.2: 15.27 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:06:57.09 -05:37:40.2: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8801 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52592.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52598.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52722.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52735.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52761.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52915.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53044.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52522_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52522_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52523_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52523_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52525_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52525_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52528_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52528_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52538_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52538_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52540_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52540_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52545_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52545_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52556_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52556_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:03:41.71 -04:57:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52592_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 52592_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52598_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 52598_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52622_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52622_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52703_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52703_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52722_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 52722_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52735_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 52735_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52761_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 52761_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52804_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52804_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52833_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52833_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52902_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52902_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52915_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 52915_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52917_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52917_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52923_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52923_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52927_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52927_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52928_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52928_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52934_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52934_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52935_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52935_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52936_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52936_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52939_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52939_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52944_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52944_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52955_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52955_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52960_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52960_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52962_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52962_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52965_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52965_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52966_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52966_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52974_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52974_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52976_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52976_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52978_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52978_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52979_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52979_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52981_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52981_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52985_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52985_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52989_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52989_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52996_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52996_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52999_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 52999_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53004_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53004_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53007_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53007_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53014_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53014_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53019_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53019_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53034_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53034_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53035_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53035_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53040_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53040_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53044_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 53044_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53045_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53045_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53051_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53051_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53053_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53053_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53060_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53060_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53062_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53062_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53063_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53063_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53067_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53067_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53068_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53068_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53072_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53072_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53077_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53077_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53084_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53084_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53089_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53089_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53090_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53090_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53092_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53092_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53093_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53093_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53094_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53094_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53101_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53101_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53105_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53105_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53106_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53106_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53107_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53107_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53108_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53108_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53111_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53111_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53113_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53113_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53118_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53118_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53133_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53133_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53136_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53136_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53140_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53140_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53163_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275
The candidate 53163_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-05-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275 did not pass the final checks
