This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 17.2002 2461330.7002 10.48 20:24:37.62 -17:03:09.3
27.17185 -28.04947 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.324 Bamberga 0 0 0 10.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:24:37.62 -17:03:09.3: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:24:37.62 -17:03:09.3: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 17.2003* 20 24 37.62 -17 03 09.3 10.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461330.7002,10.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261017.2002 10.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 17.2002 2461330.7002 12.36 20:32:00.84 -20:35:01.5
24.11014 -30.95222 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.287 Nephthys -0 -0 0 12.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:32:00.84 -20:35:01.5: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:32:00.84 -20:35:01.5: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 17.2003* 20 32 00.84 -20 35 01.5 12.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461330.7002,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261017.2002 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 17.2002 2461330.7002 14.16 20:39:03.27 -21:05:55.2
24.19410 -32.67440 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.462 Eriphyla -1 -0 1 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:39:03.27 -21:05:55.2: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:39:03.27 -21:05:55.2: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 17.2003* 20 39 03.27 -21 05 55.2 14.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461330.7002,14.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261017.2002 14.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.87051049 22.06.2026 08:53:22.106 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
First image: 2461213.87051049 22.06.2026 08:53:22.106 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Last image: 2461330.70052200 17.10.2026 04:48:35.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9655
Objects passed selection criteria: 9641
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7662.75
Average stars matched: 6938.5 (90.5484 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234760 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 17 00:50:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.87051049 22.06.2026 08:53:22.106 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
First image: 2461213.87051049 22.06.2026 08:53:22.106 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Last image: 2461330.70052200 17.10.2026 04:48:35.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 135
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 71764
Objects passed selection criteria: 71581
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 57764.5
Average stars matched: 52439.2 (90.7811 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 283032 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 17 00:51:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461330.69997215
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.503 -17:59:55.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.382 -18:00:35.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.503 -17:59:55.30
Second-epoch image center 20:26:40.382 -18:00:35.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0112 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:38.086 -18:00:58.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.503 -17:59:55.30
Second-epoch image center 20:26:38.086 -18:00:58.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0201 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:26:40.382 -18:00:35.65
Second-epoch second image center 20:26:38.086 -18:00:58.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01114 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5sdSj7dJWy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D8jqvEd5Ym
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits &> /tmp/tmp.snUzwdvtiY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zbfrCb5UW3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10015 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2232 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2232 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Loaded 8358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6411 out of 6630 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6630 out of 10015 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.615000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.615000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.98
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.98
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10015 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2232 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2232 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Loaded 8358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6411 out of 6630 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6630 out of 10015 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 9886 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2069 to 315.1115 deg, Dec -23.2589 to -12.6185 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2069 to 315.1115 deg, Dec -23.2589 to -12.6185 deg
Loaded 8355 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6384 out of 6586 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6586 out of 9886 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
2.2 pix Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
15.0 mag. Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.5sdSj7dJWy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=610, bad_region=2162, passed=10015
Got 10015 stars (including 7361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10015 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=1460 n_q2=951 n_q3=1561 n_q4=940 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4912 N_valid=4912 bias_ra_arcsec=0.008 bias_dec_arcsec=0.057 median_sep_arcsec=0.318 p95_sep_arcsec=1.503 n_q1=1460 n_q2=951 n_q3=1561 n_q4=940 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.D8jqvEd5Ym (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=578, bad_region=1964, passed=9886
Got 9886 stars (including 7437 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9886 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8316 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8316 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8316 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=1493 n_q2=875 n_q3=1618 n_q4=920 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4906 N_valid=4906 bias_ra_arcsec=0.016 bias_dec_arcsec=0.034 median_sep_arcsec=0.333 p95_sep_arcsec=1.726 n_q1=1493 n_q2=875 n_q3=1618 n_q4=920 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.snUzwdvtiY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=475, bad_region=1676, passed=9234
Got 9234 stars (including 7170 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9234 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=6.947 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.027 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.027 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.446 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.646 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.646 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.394 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.522 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.522 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4907 robust_rms_before=0.864 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.366 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.394 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.567 worst_region_rms_after=0.522 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.078 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.522
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.567 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.567 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.366 arcsec matched=4907
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.416 n_q1=1611 n_q2=955 n_q3=1537 n_q4=804 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4907 N_valid=4907 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.195 bias_dec_arcsec=0.591 median_sep_arcsec=0.791 p95_sep_arcsec=1.618 n_q1=1611 n_q2=955 n_q3=1537 n_q4=804 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zbfrCb5UW3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=518, bad_region=1669, passed=9176
Got 9176 stars (including 7104 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9176 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5398)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=6.977 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.794 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.794 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=0.471 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.630 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.630 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=0.405 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.538 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.538 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4908 robust_rms_before=0.882 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.374 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.405 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.542 worst_region_rms_after=0.538 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.075 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.538
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.542 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.542 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.374 arcsec matched=4908
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=1607 n_q2=951 n_q3=1546 n_q4=804 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4908 N_valid=4908 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.188 bias_dec_arcsec=0.603 median_sep_arcsec=0.809 p95_sep_arcsec=1.611 n_q1=1607 n_q2=951 n_q3=1546 n_q4=804 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.175
ref2=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.113
new1=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.181
new2=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.177
reference average sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.144
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394_astrometric_residuals.png (4912 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111_astrometric_residuals.png (4908 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:37:14.69 -21:29:13.4: 11.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:24:37.62 -17:03:09.3: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:28:15.60 -13:47:58.0: 10.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:27:11.89 -16:31:50.7: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:33:24.51 -16:52:53.3: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:35:46.94 -17:32:07.3: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:35:25.09 -15:52:21.7: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:41:00.08 -16:24:25.3: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:24:37.62 -17:03:09.3: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:28:15.60 -13:47:58.0: 11.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:33:24.51 -16:52:53.3: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:37:14.69 -21:29:13.4: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:27:11.89 -16:31:50.7: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:35:25.09 -15:52:21.7: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:35:46.94 -17:32:07.3: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:41:00.08 -16:24:25.3: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.98 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:24.51 -16:52:53.3: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9264 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:15.60 -13:47:58.0: ref_mag=10.98 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2674 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:14.69 -21:29:13.4: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8651 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:11.89 -16:31:50.7: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8850 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:25.09 -15:52:21.7: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9301 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:46.94 -17:32:07.3: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8706 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:00.08 -16:24:25.3: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6725 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20996.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20951_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 20951_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:32.04 -17:03:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20996_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
Preparing report for the candidate 20996_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21381_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 21381_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:29.10 -21:58:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21527_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 21527_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21934_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 21934_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22134_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 22134_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22178_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 22178_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22182_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 22182_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22203_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 22203_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22215_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 22215_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09228_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 09228_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:18.47 -14:16:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:24:37.62 -17:03:09.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.503 -17:59:55.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.382 -18:00:35.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.503 -17:59:55.30
Second-epoch image center 20:26:40.382 -18:00:35.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0112 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:38.086 -18:00:58.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.503 -17:59:55.30
Second-epoch image center 20:26:38.086 -18:00:58.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0201 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:26:40.382 -18:00:35.65
Second-epoch second image center 20:26:38.086 -18:00:58.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01114 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xBgKQtLku7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HPqvTfQh31
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qthlzBPLue
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ElpF821Zds
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 76028 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2134 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2134 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Loaded 8365 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6515 out of 7320 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7320 out of 76028 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.453300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.453300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 76028 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2134 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2134 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Loaded 8365 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6515 out of 7320 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7320 out of 76028 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 74062 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2069 to 315.1336 deg, Dec -23.2623 to -12.6186 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2069 to 315.1336 deg, Dec -23.2623 to -12.6186 deg
Loaded 8367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6550 out of 7273 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7273 out of 74062 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 76 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
2.1 pix Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
15.2 mag. Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xBgKQtLku7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=4261, bad_region=11884, passed=76012
Got 76012 stars (including 60384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76012 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=1515 n_q2=990 n_q3=1482 n_q4=924 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4911 N_valid=4911 bias_ra_arcsec=0.023 bias_dec_arcsec=0.047 median_sep_arcsec=0.312 p95_sep_arcsec=1.498 n_q1=1515 n_q2=990 n_q3=1482 n_q4=924 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HPqvTfQh31 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=4004, bad_region=10394, passed=74047
Got 74047 stars (including 60186 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1546 n_q2=870 n_q3=1588 n_q4=906 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4910 N_valid=4910 bias_ra_arcsec=0.023 bias_dec_arcsec=0.030 median_sep_arcsec=0.333 p95_sep_arcsec=1.784 n_q1=1546 n_q2=870 n_q3=1588 n_q4=906 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qthlzBPLue (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3831, bad_region=8611, passed=60737
Got 60737 stars (including 49459 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60737 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=6.949 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.225 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.225 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.449 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.650 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.650 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.395 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.521 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.521 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4900 robust_rms_before=0.870 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.395 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.580 worst_region_rms_after=0.521 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.072 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.521
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.870 -> 0.395 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits is a symbolic link
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4900 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4774 pairs (4900 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=6.938 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.155 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.155 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.447 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.650 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.650 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.394 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.523 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.523 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4774 robust_rms_before=0.394 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.394 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.394 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.523 worst_region_rms_after=0.523 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.523 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.523
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.523 vs 0.523 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits N_match=4774 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=1575 n_q2=880 n_q3=1562 n_q4=757 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4774 N_valid=4774 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.196 bias_dec_arcsec=0.599 median_sep_arcsec=0.796 p95_sep_arcsec=1.563 n_q1=1575 n_q2=880 n_q3=1562 n_q4=757 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ElpF821Zds (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=3962, bad_region=8728, passed=61365
Got 61365 stars (including 49920 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61365 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=6.989 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.240 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.240 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.469 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.630 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.630 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.403 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.534 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.534 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4896 robust_rms_before=0.887 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.372 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.403 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.560 worst_region_rms_after=0.534 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.088 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.534
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.560 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.560 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.372 arcsec matched=4896
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=1618 n_q2=908 n_q3=1595 n_q4=775 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4896 N_valid=4896 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.191 bias_dec_arcsec=0.611 median_sep_arcsec=0.813 p95_sep_arcsec=1.608 n_q1=1618 n_q2=908 n_q3=1595 n_q4=775 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-47-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_004825_TTUQ2b1x1_2438178_Y4QnvCxK/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:23:43.66 -13:51:23.9: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:30:37.08 -21:51:20.1: 13.83 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:46.80 -20:08:18.9: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:09:15.38 -15:53:01.2: 14.26 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:38:44.44 -20:41:53.0: 14.41 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:35:30.33 -19:52:20.4: 14.19 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:36:24.34 -16:49:03.8: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:40:48.94 -20:58:02.8: 13.72 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:35:08.69 -15:23:34.1: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:40:48.94 -20:58:02.8: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:23:43.66 -13:51:23.9: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:35:08.69 -15:23:34.1: 14.36 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:09:15.38 -15:53:01.2: 14.02 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:35:30.33 -19:52:20.4: 14.31 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:44:46.80 -20:08:18.9: 13.74 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:38:44.44 -20:41:53.0: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:36:24.34 -16:49:03.8: 14.25 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:30:37.08 -21:51:20.1: 13.93 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:15.38 -15:53:01.2: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1454 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:46.80 -20:08:18.9: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0080 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:43.66 -13:51:23.9: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4404 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:44.44 -20:41:53.0: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3100 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:30.33 -19:52:20.4: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2894 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:08.69 -15:23:34.1: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4049 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:32:00.84 -20:35:01.5: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:37.08 -21:51:20.1: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9548 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:48.94 -20:58:02.8: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8217 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:24.34 -16:49:03.8: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2934 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:32:00.84 -20:35:01.5: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:38:31.77 -22:07:16.3: 14.35 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:22:16.82 -15:49:38.2: 13.71 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:09:34.40 -20:36:44.3: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:43:58.35 -19:45:14.0: 14.63 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:19:48.76 -14:16:00.4: 13.59 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:09:16.16 -20:40:30.8: 14.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:18:57.26 -14:18:20.9: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:45:06.11 -21:55:11.5: 14.47 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:14.50 -21:54:58.1: 14.48 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:38:31.77 -22:07:16.3: 14.58 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:31.77 -22:07:16.3: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0474 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:09:34.40 -20:36:44.3: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:18:57.26 -14:18:20.9: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:19:48.76 -14:16:00.4: 13.67 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:22:16.82 -15:49:38.2: 15.08 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:45:06.11 -21:55:11.5: 14.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:09:16.16 -20:40:30.8: 15.00 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:43:58.35 -19:45:14.0: 14.51 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:34.40 -20:36:44.3: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0598 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:48.76 -14:16:00.4: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6051 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:16.82 -15:49:38.2: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9696 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:06.11 -21:55:11.5: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0727 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:57.26 -14:18:20.9: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7391 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:09:16.16 -20:40:30.8: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7470 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:58.35 -19:45:14.0: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1288 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:44:14.50 -21:54:58.1: 14.75 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:14.50 -21:54:58.1: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1372 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:32:50.55 -19:00:51.5: 13.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:45:03.07 -21:57:39.2: 14.43 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:25:28.01 -20:29:58.0: 14.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:35:04.62 -20:09:52.2: 14.28 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:39:03.27 -21:05:55.2: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:43:29.77 -14:27:03.8: 14.31 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:35:17.99 -16:38:23.4: 14.26 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:35:17.99 -16:38:23.4: 14.35 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:45:03.07 -21:57:39.2: 14.64 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:32:50.55 -19:00:51.5: 14.16 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:25:28.01 -20:29:58.0: 14.66 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:43:29.77 -14:27:03.8: 14.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:17.99 -16:38:23.4: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2010 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:39:03.27 -21:05:55.2: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:35:04.62 -20:09:52.2: 14.41 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:50.55 -19:00:51.5: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0887 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:03.07 -21:57:39.2: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1654 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:14.76 -20:11:52.7: 14.54 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:28.01 -20:29:58.0: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0696 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:29.77 -14:27:03.8: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3052 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:04.62 -20:09:52.2: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1629 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:44:14.76 -20:11:52.7: 14.76 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:14.76 -20:11:52.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2559 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:45:13.51 -19:37:47.7: 14.51 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:32:18.06 -21:43:25.8: 14.30 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:42:55.03 -20:57:39.2: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:37.19 -21:19:26.2: 14.57 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:42:59.14 -21:26:36.8: 15.00 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:10.98 -21:37:13.5: 14.54 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:40:41.40 -22:10:20.6: 14.68 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:32:18.06 -21:43:25.8: 14.38 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:42:59.14 -21:26:36.8: 14.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:42:55.03 -20:57:39.2: 14.89 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:44:37.19 -21:19:26.2: 14.72 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:45:13.51 -19:37:47.7: 14.95 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:44:10.98 -21:37:13.5: 14.73 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:40:41.40 -22:10:20.6: 14.78 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:18.06 -21:43:25.8: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1600 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:59.14 -21:26:36.8: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3020 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:55.03 -20:57:39.2: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3782 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:13.51 -19:37:47.7: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1896 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:37.19 -21:19:26.2: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2085 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:10.98 -21:37:13.5: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2409 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:41.40 -22:10:20.6: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2344 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:40:32.30 -21:35:46.1: 14.48 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:40:32.30 -21:35:46.1: 14.59 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:32.30 -21:35:46.1: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2306 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:46.14 -14:43:13.8: 14.65 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:26:37.91 -20:26:45.1: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:43:47.75 -22:06:01.8: 14.86 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:55.28 -21:09:24.3: 14.49 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:36:23.75 -21:36:38.6: 14.72 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:48.55 -21:04:43.1: 14.63 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:45:31.61 -22:07:50.3: 14.31 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:45:31.61 -22:07:50.3: 14.49 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:44:55.28 -21:09:24.3: 14.81 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:44:46.14 -14:43:13.8: 14.71 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:36:23.75 -21:36:38.6: 14.99 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:26:37.91 -20:26:45.1: 14.72 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:43:47.75 -22:06:01.8: 14.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:44:48.55 -21:04:43.1: 14.75 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:31.61 -22:07:50.3: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2740 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:55.28 -21:09:24.3: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4370 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:46.14 -14:43:13.8: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4137 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:47.75 -22:06:01.8: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2219 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:48.55 -21:04:43.1: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3331 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:23.75 -21:36:38.6: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2631 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:37.91 -20:26:45.1: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4022 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:45:17.11 -18:59:21.8: 14.54 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:45:17.11 -18:59:21.8: 14.36 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:17.11 -18:59:21.8: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2421 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:41:15.09 -20:28:04.7: 14.77 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:31:26.10 -19:24:29.0: 15.10 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:34:34.01 -21:54:32.8: 14.72 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:32:49.29 -19:00:50.3: 14.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:33:07.18 -21:29:13.2: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:38:10.58 -20:18:14.0: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:38:18.71 -19:10:13.0: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:41:15.09 -20:28:04.7: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:38:10.58 -20:18:14.0: 14.91 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:34:34.01 -21:54:32.8: 14.92 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:31:26.10 -19:24:29.0: 15.42 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:32:49.29 -19:00:50.3: 14.19 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:33:07.18 -21:29:13.2: 15.15 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:42:49.78 -22:08:52.4: 14.05 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:15.09 -20:28:04.7: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3285 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:38:18.71 -19:10:13.0: 15.31 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:10.58 -20:18:14.0: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3618 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:07.18 -21:29:13.2: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4277 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:49.29 -19:00:50.3: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2828 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:26.10 -19:24:29.0: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.4761 delta=0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:34.01 -21:54:32.8: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3803 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:18.71 -19:10:13.0: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5258 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:42:49.78 -22:08:52.4: 14.41 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:49.78 -22:08:52.4: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2515 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:35:21.12 -16:33:48.5: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:38:25.11 -17:18:35.6: 15.03 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:45:47.76 -22:09:36.4: 14.56 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:35:09.27 -21:44:28.1: 14.81 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:23:14.32 -18:21:22.0: 14.68 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:29:03.10 -22:03:21.8: 14.26 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:31:10.63 -16:05:40.9: 14.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:29:03.10 -22:03:21.8: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:45:47.76 -22:09:36.4: 14.54 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:35:21.12 -16:33:48.5: 14.21 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:23:14.32 -18:21:22.0: 14.40 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:35:09.27 -21:44:28.1: 15.18 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:47.76 -22:09:36.4: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2809 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:03.10 -22:03:21.8: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2570 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:21.12 -16:33:48.5: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2707 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:31:10.63 -16:05:40.9: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:42:28.33 -21:10:11.0: 14.96 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:14.32 -18:21:22.0: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4582 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:38:25.11 -17:18:35.6: 15.32 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:09.27 -21:44:28.1: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.4239 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:10.63 -16:05:40.9: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5759 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:25.11 -17:18:35.6: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5533 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:42:28.33 -21:10:11.0: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:28.33 -21:10:11.0: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4284 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:42:16.38 -22:09:14.4: 14.80 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:39:24.55 -19:00:41.0: 14.38 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:42:05.50 -22:06:57.9: 14.31 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:41:08.73 -20:36:59.3: 14.66 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:19:43.95 -17:17:54.7: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:42:28.51 -22:03:31.6: 14.31 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:40:58.12 -20:37:59.7: 14.48 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:40:58.12 -20:37:59.7: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:42:05.50 -22:06:57.9: 14.90 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:42:16.38 -22:09:14.4: 14.85 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:19:43.95 -17:17:54.7: 14.94 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:41:08.73 -20:36:59.3: 14.96 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:39:24.55 -19:00:41.0: 14.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:42:28.51 -22:03:31.6: 15.04 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:58.12 -20:37:59.7: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4220 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:05.50 -22:06:57.9: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4585 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:43.95 -17:17:54.7: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3527 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:16.38 -22:09:14.4: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3815 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:24.55 -19:00:41.0: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4976 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:08.73 -20:36:59.3: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5236 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:28.51 -22:03:31.6: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4533 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:42:02.47 -22:05:49.0: 14.53 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:42:02.47 -22:05:49.0: 14.71 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:02.47 -22:05:49.0: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3140 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:38:39.20 -21:17:05.6: 14.67 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:24:16.33 -21:05:20.0: 14.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:27:09.23 -20:57:42.2: 14.61 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:33:26.09 -22:06:38.6: 14.76 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:24:16.33 -21:05:20.0: 14.59 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:27:09.23 -20:57:42.2: 14.43 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:38:39.20 -21:17:05.6: 14.77 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:33:26.09 -22:06:38.6: 14.54 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:16.33 -21:05:20.0: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5085 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:09.23 -20:57:42.2: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3556 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:39.20 -21:17:05.6: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4362 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:26.09 -22:06:38.6: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3354 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100608.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102498.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94657.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91974_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 91974_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91977_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 91977_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91983_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 91983_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91985_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 91985_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91986_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 91986_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91992_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 91992_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91993_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 91993_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92005_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 92005_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92006_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 92006_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92483_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 92483_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:24:37.63 -17:03:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94657_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
Preparing report for the candidate 94657_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95173_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 95173_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:44.69 -20:54:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95572_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 95572_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97201_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 97201_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98984_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 98984_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100608_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 100608_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:16.16 -20:40:30.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.347 6866301823128587776 302.31665609337 -20.67506852790 12.9732 11.6392 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.347#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101221_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 101221_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101508_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 101508_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101609_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 101609_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101754_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 101754_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101825_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 101825_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101882_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 101882_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102118_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 102118_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102125_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 102125_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102140_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 102140_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102187_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 102187_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102226_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 102226_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102498_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
Preparing report for the candidate 102498_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102641_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 102641_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102817_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 102817_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102886_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 102886_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102964_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 102964_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103135_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103135_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103143_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103143_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103146_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103146_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103213_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103213_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103263_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103263_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103351_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103351_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103375_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103375_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103417_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103417_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103438_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103438_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103490_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103490_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103500_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103500_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103520_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103520_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103599_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103599_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103611_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103611_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103644_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103644_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103665_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103665_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103705_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103705_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103732_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103732_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103738_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103738_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103766_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103766_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103789_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103789_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103798_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103798_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103801_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103801_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103832_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103832_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103917_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103917_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103942_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103942_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103982_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 103982_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104003_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 104003_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104007_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 104007_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104027_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 104027_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104110_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 104110_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104147_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 104147_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104153_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 104153_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104165_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 104165_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104170_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 104170_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104244_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 104244_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104334_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 104334_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104341_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 104341_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104483_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 104483_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104566_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 104566_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104683_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 104683_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62252_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 62252_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:18.47 -14:16:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07340_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 07340_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:29.10 -21:58:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86899_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 86899_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_23-48-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks