This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3737 2461326.8737 12.24 03:26:08.38 +16:56:21.9
167.83372 -32.12791 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.72 Feronia 0 -0 0 12.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:26:08.38 +16:56:21.9: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:26:08.38 +16:56:21.9: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3737* 03 26 08.38 +16 56 21.9 12.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8737,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3737 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3737 2461326.8737 13.59 03:56:32.26 +15:14:07.9
175.27992 -28.27547 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.443 Photographica 0 -0 0 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:56:32.26 +15:14:07.9: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:56:32.26 +15:14:07.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3737* 03 56 32.26 +15 14 07.9 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8737,13.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3737 13.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3737 2461326.8737 13.73 03:46:29.97 +17:09:42.7
171.79735 -28.65695 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.131 Vala 0 -0 0 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:46:29.97 +17:09:42.7: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:46:29.97 +17:09:42.7: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3737* 03 46 29.97 +17 09 42.7 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8737,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3737 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3737 2461326.8737 13.97 03:56:43.01 +15:32:52.2
175.05492 -28.03042 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.742 Edisona -0 0 0 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:56:43.01 +15:32:52.2: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:56:43.01 +15:32:52.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3737* 03 56 43.01 +15 32 52.2 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8737,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3737 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3737 2461326.8737 14.04 03:57:06.38 +10:54:10.2
179.08505 -31.08031 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.655 Briseis -1 -1 1 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:57:06.38 +10:54:10.2: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:57:06.38 +10:54:10.2: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3737* 03 57 06.38 +10 54 10.2 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8737,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3737 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3737 2461326.8737 14.64 03:52:21.06 +15:47:04.7
174.03711 -28.62863 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1350 Rosselia 1 0 1 14.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:52:21.06 +15:47:04.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:52:21.06 +15:47:04.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3737* 03 52 21.06 +15 47 04.7 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8737,14.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3737 14.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3737 2461326.8737 14.73 03:59:24.00 +11:28:14.6
179.01797 -30.28306 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 1.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1055 Tynka -0 1 1 14.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:59:24.00 +11:28:14.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:59:24.00 +11:28:14.6: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3737* 03 59 24.00 +11 28 14.6 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8737,14.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3737 14.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3737 2461326.8737 14.88 03:59:26.17 +09:44:00.1
180.55892 -31.40929 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.3" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 03:59:26.17 +09:44:00.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:59:26.17 +09:44:00.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:59:26.17 +09:44:00.1: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3737* 03 59 26.17 +09 44 00.1 14.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461326.8737,14.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261013.3737 14.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3737 2461326.8737 15.00 03:57:13.56 +11:28:18.9
178.60939 -30.68273 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.1" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 03:57:13.56 +11:28:18.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:57:13.56 +11:28:18.9: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:57:13.56 +11:28:18.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3737* 03 57 13.56 +11 28 18.9 15.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461326.8737,15.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261013.3737 15.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3737 2461326.8737 15.05 04:01:14.09 +11:44:24.1
179.12392 -29.76730 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.8" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 04:01:14.09 +11:44:24.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:01:14.09 +11:44:24.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:01:14.09 +11:44:24.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3737* 04 01 14.09 +11 44 24.1 15.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461326.8737,15.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261013.3737 15.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
First image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Last image: 2461326.87392022 13.10.2026 08:58:16.707 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6068
Objects passed selection criteria: 6066
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5864.5
Average stars matched: 5729.5 (97.698 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233192 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 04:08:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
First image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Last image: 2461326.87392022 13.10.2026 08:58:16.707 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 322
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.97
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 38784
Objects passed selection criteria: 38710
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 37021.5
Average stars matched: 36006.2 (97.2577 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 262476 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 04:09:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461326.87349279
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.716 +13:59:41.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:20.716 +13:59:41.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0036 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.477 +13:59:48.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:20.477 +13:59:48.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0014 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:33:20.716 +13:59:41.68
Second-epoch second image center 03:33:20.477 +13:59:48.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00219 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AJdvr4iKqF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wkkuhH7y94
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ETTjRKY1cV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SSJMHhcyhP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.950750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.950750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec +8.6182 to +19.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec 8.6182 to 19.2791 deg
Loaded 4354 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3736 out of 7722 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
2.0 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.AJdvr4iKqF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=551, bad_region=1716, passed=7716
Got 7716 stars (including 5573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1724 n_q2=1005 n_q3=1514 n_q4=651 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.261
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wkkuhH7y94 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=536, bad_region=1716, passed=7722
Got 7722 stars (including 5589 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1731 n_q2=1006 n_q3=1513 n_q4=648 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ETTjRKY1cV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=418, bad_region=1604, passed=7433
Got 7433 stars (including 5490 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7433 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5375)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=7.694 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.172 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.172 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.379 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.760 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.760 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.310 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.486 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.486 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4888 robust_rms_before=0.873 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.307 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.310 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.530 worst_region_rms_after=0.486 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.081 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.486
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.530 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.530 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.307 arcsec matched=4888
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=1759 n_q2=1010 n_q3=1477 n_q4=642 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.SSJMHhcyhP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=411, bad_region=1588, passed=7380
Got 7380 stars (including 5448 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7380 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5376)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=7.714 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.676 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.676 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.666 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.666 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.348 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.489 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.489 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4889 robust_rms_before=0.893 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.349 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.348 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.516 worst_region_rms_after=0.489 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.064 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.489
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.516 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.516 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.349 arcsec matched=4889
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.398 n_q1=1757 n_q2=1011 n_q3=1480 n_q4=641 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.261
ref2=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.264
new1=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits sigma_overall=0.316 worst_q_ratio=1.088
new2=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.079
reference average sigma_overall=0.3205 worst_q_ratio=1.2625
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137_astrometric_residuals.png (4894 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458_astrometric_residuals.png (4888 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459_astrometric_residuals.png (4889 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:38:55.27 +16:23:48.4: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:26:08.38 +16:56:21.9: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:29:23.59 +13:29:49.5: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:34:00.84 +16:04:03.5: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:34:00.84 +16:04:03.5: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:38:55.27 +16:23:48.4: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:29:23.59 +13:29:49.5: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:26:08.38 +16:56:21.9: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:00.84 +16:04:03.5: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4327 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:55.27 +16:23:48.4: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3535 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:23.59 +13:29:49.5: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4249 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20322.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20314_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 20314_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20321_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 20321_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:23.37 +16:01:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20322_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 20322_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20323_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 20323_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20324_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 20324_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05772_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 05772_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:28.54 +11:24:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
03:26:08.38 +16:56:21.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.716 +13:59:41.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:20.716 +13:59:41.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0036 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.477 +13:59:48.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:20.477 +13:59:48.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0014 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:33:20.716 +13:59:41.68
Second-epoch second image center 03:33:20.477 +13:59:48.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00219 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cpX5SZH0ry
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bHHKrlICpg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zwHDF01b9v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e8QSzVhJEC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.817800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.817800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.97
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.85
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.85
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 48560 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec +8.6183 to +19.2794 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec 8.6183 to 19.2794 deg
Loaded 4358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3320 out of 3753 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3753 out of 48560 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 198 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
1.9 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
15.8 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cpX5SZH0ry (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2222, bad_region=8835, passed=48571
Got 48571 stars (including 37859 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48571 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1704 n_q2=988 n_q3=1521 n_q4=680 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bHHKrlICpg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2192, bad_region=8846, passed=48544
Got 48544 stars (including 37859 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48544 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=1702 n_q2=993 n_q3=1515 n_q4=681 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zwHDF01b9v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1824, bad_region=6587, passed=41106
Got 41106 stars (including 33108 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41106 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=7.498 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.881 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.881 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.382 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.781 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.781 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.311 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.484 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.484 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4885 robust_rms_before=0.872 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.307 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.311 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.535 worst_region_rms_after=0.484 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.090 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.484
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.535 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.535 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.307 arcsec matched=4885
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=1749 n_q2=982 n_q3=1495 n_q4=659 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.e8QSzVhJEC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1889, bad_region=6713, passed=41717
Got 41717 stars (including 33587 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41717 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=7.557 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.918 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.918 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.695 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.695 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.498 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.498 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4883 robust_rms_before=0.888 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.345 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.524 worst_region_rms_after=0.498 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.074 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.498
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.524 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.524 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.343 arcsec matched=4883
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=1757 n_q2=985 n_q3=1483 n_q4=658 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.101
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040626_TTUQ2b1x1_1273503_UzAmpnP1/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:34:29.78 +13:36:50.2: 14.80 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:56:20.23 +12:42:54.4: 15.17 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:37:52.11 +10:46:42.8: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:43:57.23 +11:11:03.6: 14.87 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:57:48.13 +14:05:04.2: 14.47 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:56:20.23 +12:42:54.4: 15.21 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:57:48.13 +14:05:04.2: 14.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:34:29.78 +13:36:50.2: 14.71 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:43:57.23 +11:11:03.6: 14.92 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:57:34.62 +11:30:41.0: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:37:52.11 +10:46:42.8: 14.60 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:20.23 +12:42:54.4: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9992 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:29.78 +13:36:50.2: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7674 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:48.13 +14:05:04.2: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5578 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:52.11 +10:46:42.8: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6286 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:57.23 +11:11:03.6: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0214 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:48:33.57 +15:11:22.9: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:57:34.62 +11:30:41.0: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:34.62 +11:30:41.0: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7856 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:48:33.57 +15:11:22.9: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:33.57 +15:11:22.9: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0325 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:56:32.26 +15:14:07.9: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:46:29.97 +17:09:42.7: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:56:32.26 +15:14:07.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:46:29.97 +17:09:42.7: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:56:43.01 +15:32:52.2: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:57:06.38 +10:54:10.2: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:56:43.01 +15:32:52.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:57:06.38 +10:54:10.2: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:16.38 +17:05:15.3: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:23:30.51 +17:10:25.9: 14.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:54:00.29 +15:36:14.3: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:16.38 +17:05:15.3: 14.48 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:16.38 +17:05:15.3: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2639 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:23:30.51 +17:10:25.9: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:30.51 +17:10:25.9: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3336 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:54:00.29 +15:36:14.3: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:00.29 +15:36:14.3: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2337 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:52:05.68 +15:45:14.9: 15.96 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:52:21.06 +15:47:04.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:52:05.68 +15:45:14.9: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.96 +/- 0.29
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:52:05.68 +15:45:14.9: ref_mag=15.96 +/- 0.29 new_mean_mag=14.5774 delta=1.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:52:21.06 +15:47:04.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:20:36.55 +14:40:19.5: 14.83 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:43:23.78 +18:09:01.5: 14.57 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:20:36.55 +14:40:19.5: 14.55 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:36.55 +14:40:19.5: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6381 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:59:24.00 +11:28:14.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:43:23.78 +18:09:01.5: 14.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:23.78 +18:09:01.5: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7132 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:59:24.00 +11:28:14.6: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:59:26.17 +09:44:00.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:32:39.75 +17:39:42.2: 14.67 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:59:26.17 +09:44:00.1: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:32:39.75 +17:39:42.2: 14.80 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:32:39.75 +17:39:42.2: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7171 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:57:13.56 +11:28:18.9: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:31:49.58 +15:08:05.5: 15.11 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:57:13.56 +11:28:18.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:31:49.58 +15:08:05.5: 14.96 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:49.58 +15:08:05.5: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9076 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:39:20.72 +17:40:56.4: 15.35 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:39:20.72 +17:40:56.4: 15.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:20.72 +17:40:56.4: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1087 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:01:14.09 +11:44:24.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:21.60 +16:34:36.4: 15.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:22:25.33 +17:43:16.0: 15.06 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:25:56.69 +12:31:03.9: 15.63 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:01:14.09 +11:44:24.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:21.60 +16:34:36.4: 15.33 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:21.60 +16:34:36.4: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0075 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:41:09.47 +09:46:24.0: 15.50 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:42:29.67 +15:25:21.9: 15.35 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:30.86 +09:56:30.7: 15.10 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:22:25.33 +17:43:16.0: 15.14 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:25:56.69 +12:31:03.9: 15.66 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:25.33 +17:43:16.0: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0435 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.64 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:56.69 +12:31:03.9: ref_mag=15.64 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1935 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:41:09.47 +09:46:24.0: 15.57 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.53 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:09.47 +09:46:24.0: ref_mag=15.53 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1998 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:42:29.67 +15:25:21.9: 15.36 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:29.67 +15:25:21.9: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0505 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:30.86 +09:56:30.7: 15.38 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:30.86 +09:56:30.7: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1268 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53143.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53004.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53023.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53054.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53071.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53152.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53177.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53184.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53221.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53292.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52899_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52899_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52901_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52901_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52908_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52908_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52909_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52909_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52910_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52910_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52911_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52911_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52922_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52922_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52924_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52924_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52925_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52925_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52928_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52928_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52930_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52930_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52935_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52935_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:26:08.38 +16:56:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52937_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52937_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52943_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52943_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52944_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52944_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52946_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52946_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52947_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52947_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52948_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52948_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52951_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52951_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52956_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52956_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52959_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52959_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52961_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52961_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52967_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52967_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52969_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52969_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52972_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52972_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52973_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52973_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52976_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52976_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:02.15 +16:29:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52978_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52978_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52979_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52979_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:24.46 +13:57:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52980_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52980_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52982_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52982_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52985_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52985_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52988_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52988_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52990_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52990_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52991_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52991_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52994_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52994_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52995_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52995_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52997_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 52997_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53000_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53000_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53001_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53001_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53004_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 53004_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53005_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53005_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53008_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53008_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53010_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53010_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53011_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53011_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53012_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53012_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53015_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53015_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53016_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53016_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:22.78 +16:16:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53020_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53020_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53021_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53021_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53022_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53022_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53023_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 53023_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53025_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53025_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53026_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53026_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:49.65 +12:30:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53027_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53027_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53028_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53028_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53029_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53029_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53030_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53030_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53031_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53031_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53032_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53032_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53034_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53034_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53040_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53040_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53041_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53041_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53043_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53043_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53044_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53044_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53046_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53046_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53047_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53047_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53050_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53050_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53051_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53051_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53054_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 53054_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53059_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53059_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53060_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53060_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53062_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53062_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53063_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53063_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53064_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53064_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53066_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53066_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53067_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53067_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53068_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53068_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53069_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53069_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53071_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 53071_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53073_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53073_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53074_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53074_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53075_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53075_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53076_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53076_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53080_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53080_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53081_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53081_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53082_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53082_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53083_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53083_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53090_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53090_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53091_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53091_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53092_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53092_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53093_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53093_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53094_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53094_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53095_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53095_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53096_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53096_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53097_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53097_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53099_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53099_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53100_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53100_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53102_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53102_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53108_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53108_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53109_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53109_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53111_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53111_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53112_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53112_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53113_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53113_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53117_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53117_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53121_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53121_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53122_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53122_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53124_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53124_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53127_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53127_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53129_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53129_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53131_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53131_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53133_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53133_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53137_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53137_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53138_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53138_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53139_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53139_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53140_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53140_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53143_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53143_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:05.68 +15:45:14.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.58, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.56)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.866 40347889149027968 058.02358060350 +15.75436470737 15.4971 14.2503 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.866#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53144_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53144_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53145_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53145_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53146_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53146_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53148_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53148_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53150_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53150_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53151_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53151_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53152_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 53152_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53153_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53153_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53154_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53154_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53156_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53156_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53158_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53158_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53159_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53159_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53161_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53161_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53164_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53164_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53172_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53172_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53173_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53173_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53174_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53174_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53175_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53175_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53176_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53176_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53177_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 53177_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53178_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53178_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53179_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53179_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53180_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53180_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53181_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53181_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53182_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53182_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53183_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53183_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53184_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 53184_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53187_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53187_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53188_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53188_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53193_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53193_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53195_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53195_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53196_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53196_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53199_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53199_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53200_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53200_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53202_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53202_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53206_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53206_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53208_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53208_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53211_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53211_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53213_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53213_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53214_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53214_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53217_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53217_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53218_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53218_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53219_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53219_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53221_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 53221_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53222_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53222_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53224_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53224_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53226_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53226_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53227_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53227_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53235_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53235_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53238_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53238_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53241_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53241_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53242_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53242_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53244_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53244_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53249_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53249_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53250_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53250_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53262_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53262_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53266_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53266_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53271_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53271_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53277_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53277_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53280_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53280_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53281_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53281_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53283_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53283_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53285_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53285_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53288_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53288_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53292_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 53292_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53296_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53296_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53301_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53301_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53305_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53305_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53307_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53307_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53310_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53310_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53320_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53320_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53321_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53321_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53322_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53322_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53324_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53324_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53328_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53328_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53335_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 53335_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42495_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 42495_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:28.54 +11:24:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17153_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 17153_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:23.31 +16:01:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31093_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 31093_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37088_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 37088_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:21.69 +10:25:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07849_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 07849_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
