This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3649 2461326.8649 13.18 04:36:32.04 +25:31:11.5
173.74295 -14.44684 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata 0 1 1 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:36:32.04 +25:31:11.5: 16.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:36:32.04 +25:31:11.5: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3649* 04 36 32.04 +25 31 11.5 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8649,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3649 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3649 2461326.8649 13.38 04:33:03.32 +25:52:05.1
172.94369 -14.81744 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia 0 0 0 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:03.32 +25:52:05.1: 16.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:03.32 +25:52:05.1: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3649* 04 33 03.32 +25 52 05.1 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8649,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3649 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3649 2461326.8649 14.73 04:43:48.43 +20:29:02.7
178.89058 -16.32533 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.311 Claudia -0 -0 1 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:43:48.43 +20:29:02.7: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:43:48.43 +20:29:02.7: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3649* 04 43 48.43 +20 29 02.7 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8649,14.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3649 14.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3649 2461326.8649 14.93 04:50:16.18 +23:21:04.8
177.50530 -13.38007 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1219 Britta -0 -1 1 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:50:16.18 +23:21:04.8: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:50:16.18 +23:21:04.8: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3649* 04 50 16.18 +23 21 04.8 14.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8649,14.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3649 14.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3649 2461326.8649 14.90 04:17:56.93 +24:09:52.4
171.89615 -18.50600 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.341 California -1 0 1 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:56.93 +24:09:52.4: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:56.93 +24:09:52.4: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3649* 04 17 56.93 +24 09 52.4 14.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8649,14.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3649 14.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461326.86526138 13.10.2026 08:45:48.583 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10402
Objects passed selection criteria: 10370
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7952.5
Average stars matched: 7338.75 (92.2823 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235512 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 03:58:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461326.86526138 13.10.2026 08:45:48.583 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 137
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 77670
Objects passed selection criteria: 77480
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 60839.8
Average stars matched: 55973.8 (92.0019 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 292932 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 03:59:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461326.86451134
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.767 +22:00:28.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:55.767 +22:00:28.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0144 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:58.427 +22:01:11.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:58.427 +22:01:11.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0277 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:55.767 +22:00:28.94
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:58.427 +22:01:11.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01561 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dS2LSAszmm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DGnnaKY9lJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HRHKmCXMaW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits &> /tmp/tmp.69EeeMeVXX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.991000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.991000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2796 deg
Loaded 5169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3956 out of 4300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4300 out of 11076 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.dS2LSAszmm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=2517, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 8622 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4820 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4820 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1641 n_q2=611 n_q3=1816 n_q4=752 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DGnnaKY9lJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=897, bad_region=2444, passed=11076
Got 11076 stars (including 7922 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4818 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4818 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1645 n_q2=622 n_q3=1785 n_q4=766 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HRHKmCXMaW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=698, bad_region=3192, passed=10139
Got 10139 stars (including 6435 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10139 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4868 stars left (next iteration limit 5353)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4868 robust_rms=8.050 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.443 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.443 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4868 robust_rms=0.508 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.820 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.820 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4868 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.492 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.492 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4868 robust_rms_before=1.130 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.429 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.547 worst_region_rms_after=0.492 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.234 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.492
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.784 +22:00:28.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10139 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1000040.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.130 -> 0.393 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4868 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4739 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4739 pairs (4868 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4739 robust_rms=8.049 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.577 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.577 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4739 robust_rms=0.505 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.823 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.823 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4739 robust_rms=0.391 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.495 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.495 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4739 robust_rms_before=0.391 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.391 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.391 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.489 worst_region_rms_after=0.495 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.489 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.495
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.495 vs 0.489 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits N_match=4739 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.465 n_q1=1405 n_q2=1106 n_q3=1424 n_q4=804 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.69EeeMeVXX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=706, bad_region=3249, passed=10233
Got 10233 stars (including 6463 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10233 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7602 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7602 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7601 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5358)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=8.071 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.589 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.589 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.543 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.824 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.824 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.403 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.491 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.491 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=1.150 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.436 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.403 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.558 worst_region_rms_after=0.491 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.213 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.491
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:58.442 +22:01:10.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10233 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1000126.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.150 -> 0.403 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4871 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4741 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4741 pairs (4871 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=8.050 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.729 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.729 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=0.541 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.802 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.802 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=0.400 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.491 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.491 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4741 robust_rms_before=0.400 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.400 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.400 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.484 worst_region_rms_after=0.491 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.484 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.491
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.491 vs 0.484 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7601 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits N_match=4741 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.485 n_q1=1400 n_q2=1111 n_q3=1426 n_q4=804 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.284
ref2=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.245
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.078
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits sigma_overall=0.450 worst_q_ratio=1.079
reference average sigma_overall=0.3385 worst_q_ratio=1.2645
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (4820 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4818 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444_astrometric_residuals.png (4739 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445_astrometric_residuals.png (4741 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:52.06 +22:50:29.6: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:13.76 +25:16:24.0: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:07.53 +22:37:22.6: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:13.76 +25:16:24.0: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:07.53 +22:37:22.6: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:52.06 +22:50:29.6: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:13.76 +25:16:24.0: ref_mag=11.50 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7302 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:07.53 +22:37:22.6: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5339 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:52.06 +22:50:29.6: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5079 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21198_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 21198_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21998_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 21998_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22063_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 22063_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.56 +20:15:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.784 +22:00:28.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:55.784 +22:00:28.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0141 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:58.442 +22:01:10.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:58.442 +22:01:10.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0275 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:55.784 +22:00:28.13
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:58.442 +22:01:10.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01562 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4lo5GxlKwR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ALd0viqGTS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q01YaOleZP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kTmXKTDyWo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.845600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.845600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 80651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec +16.4671 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec 16.4671 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 5197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3489 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 80651 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 110 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.8 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.7 (SNR ) 14.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4lo5GxlKwR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=6242, bad_region=13891, passed=86324
Got 86324 stars (including 66886 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5332)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1602 n_q2=612 n_q3=1848 n_q4=786 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ALd0viqGTS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=5759, bad_region=13221, passed=80633
Got 80633 stars (including 62313 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5329)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1583 n_q2=633 n_q3=1821 n_q4=807 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Q01YaOleZP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=4294, bad_region=16872, passed=69108
Got 69108 stars (including 49440 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69108 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=8.062 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.012 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.012 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.506 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.862 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.862 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.392 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.488 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.488 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4878 robust_rms_before=0.390 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.414 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.392 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.499 worst_region_rms_after=0.488 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.499 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.488
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.499 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.499 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.390 arcsec matched=4878
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=1463 n_q2=1119 n_q3=1473 n_q4=823 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kTmXKTDyWo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=4322, bad_region=16921, passed=69596
Got 69596 stars (including 49828 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69596 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=8.089 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.002 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.002 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.543 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.879 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.879 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.402 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.514 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.514 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4877 robust_rms_before=0.400 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.420 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.402 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.501 worst_region_rms_after=0.514 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.501 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.514
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.501 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.501 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.400 arcsec matched=4877
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.500 n_q1=1462 n_q2=1113 n_q3=1475 n_q4=827 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.110
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-44-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035624_TTUQ2b1x1_992567_W8URcYOs/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:41.48 +25:10:25.3: 14.98 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:49.05 +23:14:54.6: 14.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:35.92 +22:48:20.8: 14.66 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:21.18 +22:17:59.9: 15.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:52.96 +18:38:37.8: 14.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:19:09.44 +24:13:21.7: 15.09 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:51.26 +25:27:18.9: 14.53 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:23.00 +21:44:42.4: 15.24 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:37.64 +24:08:10.7: 15.05 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:54.72 +20:14:03.2: 14.79 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:35.92 +22:48:20.8: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:51.26 +25:27:18.9: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:52.96 +18:38:37.8: 14.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:23.00 +21:44:42.4: 15.21 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:54.72 +20:14:03.2: 14.72 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:19:09.44 +24:13:21.7: 14.78 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:37.64 +24:08:10.7: 15.11 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:41.48 +25:10:25.3: 14.85 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:21.18 +22:17:59.9: 15.33 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:49.05 +23:14:54.6: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:35.92 +22:48:20.8: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8713 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:54.72 +20:14:03.2: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.8353 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:23.00 +21:44:42.4: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1476 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:51.26 +25:27:18.9: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.7413 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:37.64 +24:08:10.7: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8995 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:09.44 +24:13:21.7: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0735 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:52.96 +18:38:37.8: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4227 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:41.48 +25:10:25.3: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=15.1016 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:49.05 +23:14:54.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.7256 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:21.18 +22:17:59.9: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0585 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:13.43 +21:18:39.7: 13.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:12.13 +19:12:46.6: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:01.78 +21:12:59.1: 13.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:06.74 +23:22:19.0: 13.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:24:04.88 +21:57:38.5: 14.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:26:13.55 +21:46:20.8: 14.38 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:27:22.38 +22:30:57.8: 13.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:20.32 +21:31:12.3: 13.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:17.46 +20:33:30.2: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:13.43 +21:18:39.7: 13.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:13.43 +21:18:39.7: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8801 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:12.13 +19:12:46.6: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:01.78 +21:12:59.1: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:06.74 +23:22:19.0: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:12.13 +19:12:46.6: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1678 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:01.78 +21:12:59.1: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9073 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:06.74 +23:22:19.0: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2123 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:26:13.55 +21:46:20.8: 14.39 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:24:04.88 +21:57:38.5: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:17.46 +20:33:30.2: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:27:22.38 +22:30:57.8: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:20.32 +21:31:12.3: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:13.55 +21:46:20.8: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.6043 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:17.46 +20:33:30.2: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8055 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:22.38 +22:30:57.8: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7864 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:04.88 +21:57:38.5: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.4005 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:20.32 +21:31:12.3: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0461 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:36:32.04 +25:31:11.5: 16.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:03.32 +25:52:05.1: 16.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:02.06 +24:08:02.3: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:47.29 +22:58:08.5: 13.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:17.85 +24:00:01.1: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:11.87 +18:28:59.3: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:36:32.04 +25:31:11.5: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:03.32 +25:52:05.1: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:19.77 +20:10:11.8: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:19.81 +20:42:09.1: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:17.85 +24:00:01.1: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:17.85 +24:00:01.1: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0441 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:11.87 +18:28:59.3: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:47.29 +22:58:08.5: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:02.06 +24:08:02.3: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:11.87 +18:28:59.3: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1661 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:02.06 +24:08:02.3: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1171 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:47.29 +22:58:08.5: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9286 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:19.77 +20:10:11.8: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:19.77 +20:10:11.8: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1739 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:58.13 +23:28:50.1: 14.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:54.34 +26:03:38.7: 14.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:19.81 +20:42:09.1: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:19.81 +20:42:09.1: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2491 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:58.13 +23:28:50.1: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:54.34 +26:03:38.7: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:58.13 +23:28:50.1: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2738 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:54.34 +26:03:38.7: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3634 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:41:53.34 +24:49:14.7: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:48.35 +19:42:38.6: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:45.41 +19:20:18.0: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:27:17.74 +23:02:02.6: 14.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:38.12 +19:03:13.5: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:26.83 +18:49:53.9: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:41:53.34 +24:49:14.7: 14.61 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:53.34 +24:49:14.7: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4333 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:48.35 +19:42:38.6: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:45.41 +19:20:18.0: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:27:17.74 +23:02:02.6: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:48.35 +19:42:38.6: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3506 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:45.41 +19:20:18.0: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3174 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:17.74 +23:02:02.6: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4776 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:21.07 +22:55:30.4: 14.75 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:25.21 +17:51:21.4: 14.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:38.12 +19:03:13.5: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:26.83 +18:49:53.9: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:38.12 +19:03:13.5: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3467 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:26.83 +18:49:53.9: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4117 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:21.07 +22:55:30.4: 14.72 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:25.21 +17:51:21.4: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:21.07 +22:55:30.4: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5247 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:25.21 +17:51:21.4: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4984 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:10.31 +22:14:39.4: 14.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:14.71 +23:46:26.7: 14.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:03.75 +17:44:06.0: 14.56 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:20.91 +22:30:10.8: 14.75 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:59.37 +18:36:22.9: 14.80 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:10.31 +22:14:39.4: 14.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:10.31 +22:14:39.4: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5171 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:03.75 +17:44:06.0: 14.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:03.75 +17:44:06.0: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5089 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:14.71 +23:46:26.7: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:14.71 +23:46:26.7: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5786 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:01.14 +19:10:17.8: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:27.13 +19:47:06.7: 14.81 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:43:48.43 +20:29:02.7: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:20.91 +22:30:10.8: 14.71 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:20.91 +22:30:10.8: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7788 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:59.37 +18:36:22.9: 14.74 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:59.37 +18:36:22.9: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7606 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:01.14 +19:10:17.8: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:01.14 +19:10:17.8: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6305 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:27.13 +19:47:06.7: 14.60 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:43:48.43 +20:29:02.7: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:27.13 +19:47:06.7: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8061 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:56.93 +24:09:52.4: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:34.84 +17:50:18.8: 15.28 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:50:16.18 +23:21:04.8: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:56.93 +24:09:52.4: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:34.84 +17:50:18.8: 15.11 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:50:16.18 +23:21:04.8: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:34.84 +17:50:18.8: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9810 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:32:29.10 +17:54:16.7: 15.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:26.86 +22:32:59.3: 15.24 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:30.38 +20:35:37.9: 15.27 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:04.82 +18:09:11.8: 15.25 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:32:29.10 +17:54:16.7: 15.30 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:26.86 +22:32:59.3: 15.48 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:29.10 +17:54:16.7: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0274 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:30.38 +20:35:37.9: 15.29 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:26.86 +22:32:59.3: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0328 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:30.38 +20:35:37.9: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9415 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:04.82 +18:09:11.8: 15.31 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:04.82 +18:09:11.8: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0816 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:55.86 +18:27:01.4: 15.39 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:55.86 +18:27:01.4: 15.52 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:55.86 +18:27:01.4: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1328 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:21.24 +18:04:37.7: 15.31 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:48.08 +21:29:30.4: 15.31 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:13.39 +22:52:34.6: 15.26 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:47.43 +23:56:58.7: 15.46 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:13.39 +22:52:34.6: 15.11 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:13.39 +22:52:34.6: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0468 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:47.43 +23:56:58.7: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:28:21.24 +18:04:37.7: 15.47 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:48.08 +21:29:30.4: 15.33 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:47.43 +23:56:58.7: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0785 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:21.24 +18:04:37.7: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1025 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:48.08 +21:29:30.4: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0108 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:43.04 +18:45:58.6: 15.24 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:43.04 +18:45:58.6: 14.90 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:43.04 +18:45:58.6: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0404 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:19:24.21 +19:24:44.3: 15.44 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:31.67 +24:01:30.4: 15.45 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:05.65 +17:58:33.6: 15.23 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:04.22 +22:44:12.8: 14.83 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:31.67 +24:01:30.4: 15.66 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:31.67 +24:01:30.4: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1169 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:19:24.21 +19:24:44.3: 15.52 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:05.65 +17:58:33.6: 15.46 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.48 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:04.22 +22:44:12.8: 14.57 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:24.21 +19:24:44.3: ref_mag=15.48 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1239 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:05.65 +17:58:33.6: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.2268 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:04.22 +22:44:12.8: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.9524 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:55.05 +21:36:58.9: 15.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:55.05 +21:36:58.9: 15.05 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:55.05 +21:36:58.9: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1613 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:16.86 +21:41:09.6: 15.17 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:32.25 +19:30:54.3: 15.75 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:25.58 +22:55:43.8: 15.78 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:00.71 +19:12:13.1: 15.37 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:25.58 +22:55:43.8: 14.96 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:32.25 +19:30:54.3: 15.49 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:16.86 +21:41:09.6: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.61 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:32.25 +19:30:54.3: ref_mag=15.61 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1707 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:25.58 +22:55:43.8: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1131 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:16.86 +21:41:09.6: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1118 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:00.71 +19:12:13.1: 15.39 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:00.71 +19:12:13.1: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0935 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:36.40 +18:09:56.3: 15.60 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:24:08.41 +19:58:05.7: 15.71 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:30.27 +26:09:49.0: 15.61 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:12.39 +21:18:47.7: 15.35 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:36.40 +18:09:56.3: 15.44 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:36.40 +18:09:56.3: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1636 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:23.59 +23:36:13.4: 15.37 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:28:12.39 +21:18:47.7: 15.63 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:30.27 +26:09:49.0: 15.42 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:12.39 +21:18:47.7: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.2737 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:24:08.41 +19:58:05.7: 15.72 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:30.27 +26:09:49.0: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0982 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.71 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:08.41 +19:58:05.7: ref_mag=15.71 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.2681 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:23.59 +23:36:13.4: 15.52 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:23.59 +23:36:13.4: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1940 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:36:40.08 +19:27:50.3: 15.19 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:41.02 +25:16:37.9: 15.45 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:31.68 +21:15:39.9: 15.70 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:21:22.36 +19:42:08.3: 15.44 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:46.32 +21:12:14.4: 15.27 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:55.94 +19:00:48.8: 15.99 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:36:40.08 +19:27:50.3: 15.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:40.08 +19:27:50.3: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0900 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:38:25.52 +25:44:00.8: 16.03 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:31.68 +21:15:39.9: 15.04 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:21:22.36 +19:42:08.3: 15.43 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:41.21 +22:48:54.5: 16.02 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:41.02 +25:16:37.9: 15.40 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:31.68 +21:15:39.9: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.2663 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:46.32 +21:12:14.4: 16.07 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:22.36 +19:42:08.3: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.2557 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:09.66 +22:26:01.7: 15.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:41.02 +25:16:37.9: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.2897 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:46.32 +21:12:14.4: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1710 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:55.94 +19:00:48.8: 15.72 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.84 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:55.94 +19:00:48.8: ref_mag=15.84 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=15.2174 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:38:25.52 +25:44:00.8: 15.53 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.69 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:25.52 +25:44:00.8: ref_mag=15.69 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.2857 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:41.21 +22:48:54.5: 15.65 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.79 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:41.21 +22:48:54.5: ref_mag=15.79 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.3091 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:09.66 +22:26:01.7: 15.49 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:09.66 +22:26:01.7: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1392 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:28.46 +20:13:01.3: 15.47 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:34.18 +19:56:29.8: 14.95 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:22.66 +25:42:52.1: 15.27 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:28.46 +20:13:01.3: 15.56 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:28.46 +20:13:01.3: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.2224 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:34.18 +19:56:29.8: 15.25 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:22.66 +25:42:52.1: 15.56 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:34.18 +19:56:29.8: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1338 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:22.66 +25:42:52.1: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.2955 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103410.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103879.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out110548.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out110617.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out110888.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100453_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100453_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100459_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100459_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100467_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100467_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100470_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100470_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100471_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100471_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100472_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100472_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100473_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100473_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100483_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100483_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100484_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100484_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100486_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100486_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100491_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100491_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100495_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100495_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100498_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100498_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100502_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100502_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100504_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100504_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:44.30 +25:22:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100506_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100506_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100507_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100507_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100508_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100508_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100509_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100509_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100514_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 100514_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101191_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 101191_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.71 +19:10:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102134_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 102134_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:45.28 +19:28:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103151_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 103151_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:38.38 +22:42:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103410_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
Preparing report for the candidate 103410_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103630_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 103630_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:24.70 +22:56:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103850_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 103850_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:45.24 +19:58:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103879_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
Preparing report for the candidate 103879_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104239_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 104239_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:07.85 +21:31:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104787_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 104787_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:14.38 +24:06:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104801_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 104801_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:30.14 +21:45:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104977_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 104977_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:16.57 +21:52:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105017_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 105017_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:25.55 +18:42:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105369_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 105369_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:43.01 +22:12:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105756_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 105756_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:45.48 +19:46:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106118_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 106118_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106157_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 106157_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:58.55 +24:19:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106440_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 106440_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106681_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 106681_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:38.65 +17:55:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106709_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 106709_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106768_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 106768_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106800_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 106800_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107115_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 107115_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:31.28 +24:17:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107282_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 107282_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107547_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 107547_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:28.16 +23:36:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107631_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 107631_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107670_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 107670_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107681_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 107681_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107723_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 107723_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:59.06 +20:19:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108019_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 108019_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108049_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 108049_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108119_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 108119_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108164_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 108164_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108297_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 108297_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108383_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 108383_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108404_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 108404_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108462_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 108462_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109126_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 109126_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:28.76 +20:33:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109551_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 109551_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109563_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 109563_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109602_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 109602_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109700_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 109700_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:37.11 +22:38:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109989_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 109989_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110005_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 110005_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110363_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 110363_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110548_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
Preparing report for the candidate 110548_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110601_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 110601_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110617_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
Preparing report for the candidate 110617_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110888_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
Preparing report for the candidate 110888_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110972_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 110972_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:49.10 +22:53:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111057_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 111057_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111080_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 111080_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111116_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 111116_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111348_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 111348_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111494_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 111494_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111616_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 111616_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111638_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 111638_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111644_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 111644_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111688_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 111688_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111725_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 111725_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111788_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 111788_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111789_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 111789_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111792_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 111792_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111796_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 111796_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111813_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 111813_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111891_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 111891_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111906_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 111906_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111955_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 111955_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112020_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112020_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112098_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112098_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112132_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112132_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112139_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112139_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112177_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112177_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112189_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112189_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112237_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112237_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112259_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112259_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112277_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112277_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112290_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112290_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112326_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112326_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112347_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112347_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112435_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112435_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112450_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112450_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112514_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112514_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112522_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112522_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112530_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112530_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112544_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112544_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112589_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 112589_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.45 +18:37:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20082_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 20082_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:55.39 +24:28:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72721_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 72721_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445
The candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0445 did not pass the final checks