NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMi-01-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.29780    2461326.79780    14.38    15:35:19.67 +74:24:45.3   5884 4962   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.21    15:35:18.11 +74:24:40.4   5884 4962   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 13.2980  2461326.7980  14.29  15:35:18.89 +74:24:42.8
109.95792  38.30085 galactic  UMi  Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.9" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 15:35:18.89 +74:24:42.8 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 15:35:18.89 +74:24:42.8:  16.03 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 15:35:18.89 +74:24:42.8:  15.94 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   UMi-01-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMi-01-Q2b1x1 reference image: UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Field UMi-01-Q2b1x1 reference image: UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Field UMi-01-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits
Field UMi-01-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMi-01-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMi-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMi-01-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 385943 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 385943 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.png' -> 'transient_report/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits_preview.png'
UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits

renamed 'UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.png' -> 'transient_report/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits_preview.png'
UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 499.2566 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 584.8745 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1237.6105 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 509.6518 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1235.0989 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 512.5491 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.47891 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.006 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.3400001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-13T02:08:39.7902873' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-13T07:08:39.7902873' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61326.2976827547 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-13T07:08:49.6939272' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61326.2977973726 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 239.998289939733 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.5002772390821 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 22.9366666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 352.685277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.55205864393219 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMi-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '16 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20666 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20666 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.3400001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.3400001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 18.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 77.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.82 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 49.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.400832 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/d_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits :) Spent 0.547471 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/d_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-13T02:09:18.1627834' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-13T07:09:18.1627834' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61326.298126875 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-13T07:09:28.0657180' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61326.2982414928 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 239.998290099753 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.5002772683457 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 22.92 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 352.718333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.55379096167308 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMi-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '16 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20666 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20666 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 18.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 77.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.82 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 49.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.400832 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/d_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits :) Spent 0.543917 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/d_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits


fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461326.79779850 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:00:11.098 +77:30:32.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 Second-epoch image center 16:00:11.098 +77:30:32.11 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0120 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:00:08.799 +77:30:25.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 Second-epoch image center 16:00:08.799 +77:30:25.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0092 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 16:00:11.098 +77:30:32.11 Second-epoch second image center 16:00:08.799 +77:30:25.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00280 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dhtTWYfM4E Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6zi1ahIi6d Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sXJfMf8fv3 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bj8p0g02OP Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 10691 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.5714 to 286.0278 deg, Dec +70.2810 to +82.8119 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.5714 to 286.0278 deg, Dec 70.2810 to 82.8119 deg Loaded 12699 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6329 out of 6676 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6676 out of 10691 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.810800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.810800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 10691 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.5714 to 286.0278 deg, Dec +70.2810 to +82.8119 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.5714 to 286.0278 deg, Dec 70.2810 to 82.8119 deg Loaded 12699 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6329 out of 6676 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6676 out of 10691 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (aperture=6.3) Read 10169 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.5610 to 286.6212 deg, Dec +70.5002 to +82.8178 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.5610 to 286.6212 deg, Dec 70.5002 to 82.8178 deg Loaded 12465 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6292 out of 6524 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6524 out of 10169 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (aperture=6.3) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 2.3 pix UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 2.9 pix fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits 2.9 pix fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 15.4 mag. UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 14.3 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits 14.3 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.dhtTWYfM4E (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=761, bad_region=2666, passed=10690 Got 10690 stars (including 7457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10690 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8597 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8597 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8597 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1445 n_q2=894 n_q3=1555 n_q4=1003 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.408 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.6zi1ahIi6d (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=585, bad_region=2122, passed=10169 Got 10169 stars (including 7559 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10169 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8494 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8494 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8494 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1749 n_q2=874 n_q3=1504 n_q4=785 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.sXJfMf8fv3 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=433, bad_region=932, passed=6855 Got 6855 stars (including 5661 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6855 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.8 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6104 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.8 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6104 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6104 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5398) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=7.384 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.098 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.098 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=0.488 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.731 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.731 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.713 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.713 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4908 robust_rms_before=0.701 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.444 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.488 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.787 worst_region_rms_after=0.731 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.992 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.731 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.787 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.787 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.444 arcsec matched=4908 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1845 n_q2=769 n_q3=1642 n_q4=652 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Bj8p0g02OP (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=430, bad_region=913, passed=6914 Got 6914 stars (including 5728 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6914 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.8 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6187 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.8 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6187 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6187 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5401) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4910 robust_rms=7.474 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.127 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.127 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4910 robust_rms=0.483 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.746 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.746 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4910 robust_rms=0.465 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.745 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.745 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4910 robust_rms_before=0.720 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.448 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.483 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.782 worst_region_rms_after=0.746 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.113 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.746 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.782 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.782 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.448 arcsec matched=4910 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=1823 n_q2=785 n_q3=1651 n_q4=651 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.408 ref2=UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits sigma_overall=0.348 worst_q_ratio=1.139 new1=fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits sigma_overall=0.430 worst_q_ratio=1.166 new2=fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits sigma_overall=0.438 worst_q_ratio=1.140 reference average sigma_overall=0.336 worst_q_ratio=1.2735 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274_astrometric_residuals.png (4912 matched stars from wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358_astrometric_residuals.png (4908 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359_astrometric_residuals.png (4910 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22758_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 22758_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    10.83    14:34:52.48 +80:45:27.0   6706 0752   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits **** FOUND 14:34:52.49 +80:45:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:00:11.098 +77:30:32.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 Second-epoch image center 16:00:11.098 +77:30:32.11 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0120 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:00:08.799 +77:30:25.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 Second-epoch image center 16:00:08.799 +77:30:25.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0092 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 16:00:11.098 +77:30:32.11 Second-epoch second image center 16:00:08.799 +77:30:25.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00280 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6RAwF80NEM Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zJK2aBJhPI Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U2s6f6kztT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J8yKAOclOj Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 63033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.0727 to 286.1546 deg, Dec +70.2810 to +82.8119 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.0727 to 286.1546 deg, Dec 70.2810 to 82.8119 deg Loaded 12774 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5842 out of 6790 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6790 out of 63033 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.673850 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.673850 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.94 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.73 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.73
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 63033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.0727 to 286.1546 deg, Dec +70.2810 to +82.8119 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.0727 to 286.1546 deg, Dec 70.2810 to 82.8119 deg Loaded 12774 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5842 out of 6790 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6790 out of 63033 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (aperture=4.7) Read 56082 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.2817 to 286.6211 deg, Dec +70.4438 to +82.8301 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.2817 to 286.6211 deg, Dec 70.4438 to 82.8301 deg Loaded 12608 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5993 out of 6691 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6691 out of 56082 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (aperture=4.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 77 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 2.2 pix UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 2.9 pix fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits 2.8 pix fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 15.6 mag. UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.6RAwF80NEM (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=3819, bad_region=14777, passed=63019 Got 63019 stars (including 45340 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63019 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51505 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51505 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51505 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1498 n_q2=895 n_q3=1555 n_q4=947 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.370 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.zJK2aBJhPI (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=3064, bad_region=8309, passed=56061 Got 56061 stars (including 45134 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56061 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=1724 n_q2=895 n_q3=1471 n_q4=816 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.U2s6f6kztT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2315, bad_region=3781, passed=33450 Got 33450 stars (including 28467 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33450 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30449 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30449 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30449 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=7.333 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.657 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.657 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.488 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.718 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.718 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.459 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.702 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.702 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4904 robust_rms_before=0.701 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.440 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.488 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.736 worst_region_rms_after=0.718 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.972 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.718 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.736 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.736 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.440 arcsec matched=4904 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.405 n_q1=1849 n_q2=749 n_q3=1667 n_q4=639 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.J8yKAOclOj (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2307, bad_region=3765, passed=33840 Got 33840 stars (including 28835 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33840 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30871 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30871 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30871 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=7.385 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.770 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.770 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.481 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.733 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.733 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.461 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.728 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.728 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4904 robust_rms_before=0.723 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.449 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.481 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.755 worst_region_rms_after=0.733 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.103 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.733 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.755 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.755 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.449 arcsec matched=4904 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=1840 n_q2=754 n_q3=1687 n_q4=623 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 15:29:15.39 +78:38:54.8: 11.27 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 17:35:54.85 +79:09:30.8: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 17:35:54.85 +79:09:30.8: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 15:29:15.39 +78:38:54.8: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.38 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:35:54.85 +79:09:30.8: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0840 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:15.39 +78:38:54.8: ref_mag=11.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9474 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 16:56:58.76 +74:56:58.5: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 16:56:58.76 +74:56:58.5: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:58.76 +74:56:58.5: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8980 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 15:35:18.89 +74:24:42.8: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 15:35:18.89 +74:24:42.8: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out89185.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87716_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 87716_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.40    14:42:10.36 +77:27:15.8   7285 2681   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87719_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 87719_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.29780    2461326.79780    14.07    17:35:54.63 +79:09:30.2   2063 1777   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.10    17:35:55.07 +79:09:31.4   2061 1776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87725_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 87725_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.54    17:07:52.21 +81:23:28.4   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87728_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 87728_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.17    16:29:03.98 +78:04:20.1   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87801_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 87801_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    10.13    14:31:47.41 +78:34:54.3   7319 1924   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87809_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 87809_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    10.56    16:28:01.36 +77:25:32.7   3875 3235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87892_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 87892_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    11.16    14:30:07.92 +80:15:20.6   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88018_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88018_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    12.24    16:25:29.50 +79:08:36.1   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88021_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88021_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.29780    2461326.79780    11.94    15:29:15.22 +78:38:55.1   5669 2401   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    11.95    15:29:15.56 +78:38:54.4   5668 2401   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88129_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88129_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    12.64    16:56:12.63 +74:15:35.8   2589 5000   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits **** FOUND 16:56:12.64 +74:15:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88140_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88140_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    12.60    16:49:24.44 +73:21:38.3   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88170_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88170_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    12.54    15:44:28.25 +80:57:35.4   5060 1078   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits **** FOUND 15:44:28.37 +80:57:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88208_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88208_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    12.23    15:12:27.35 +73:23:40.4   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88255_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88255_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.08    17:54:15.06 +80:16:43.8   1865 0953   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88262_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88262_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    12.81    16:45:47.55 +77:50:34.0   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88339_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88339_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    12.67    14:30:45.20 +79:55:45.3   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88388_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88388_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.19    14:42:01.63 +80:43:24.5   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88401_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88401_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.38    17:47:52.45 +80:31:43.8   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88422_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88422_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.08    16:10:24.94 +73:33:34.0   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88431_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88431_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.02    15:12:20.80 +76:33:07.0   6476 3519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88464_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88464_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.22    17:14:08.53 +76:33:30.5   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88478_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88478_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.46    17:06:15.07 +76:01:23.1   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88490_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88490_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    12.91    14:54:35.02 +77:14:49.4   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88519_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88519_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.18    16:18:05.14 +73:26:21.2   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88523_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88523_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.46    16:47:53.97 +81:18:10.6   3587 0841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88533_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88533_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.56    17:24:53.81 +78:55:32.3   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88537_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88537_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.46    16:20:09.73 +80:16:57.6   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88555_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88555_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.15    14:59:26.90 +78:52:37.8   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88568_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88568_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.27    16:29:07.58 +73:20:25.4   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88580_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88580_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.57    16:58:14.51 +81:06:32.7   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88600_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88600_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.24    15:10:53.55 +77:23:01.4   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88625_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88625_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.24    15:19:24.52 +76:11:34.8   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88640_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88640_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.72    17:06:55.61 +81:10:25.0   3140 0831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88696_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88696_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.91    17:33:48.14 +80:32:45.8   2408 1005   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits **** FOUND 17:33:48.46 +80:32:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88707_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88707_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.58    16:19:40.93 +73:54:01.0   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88744_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88744_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.40    15:16:35.58 +77:27:49.4   6203 3019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88747_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88747_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.47    15:20:56.16 +76:47:21.3   6151 3449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88766_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88766_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.29780    2461326.79780    13.88    16:56:58.83 +74:56:58.7   2641 4584   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-08-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.93    16:56:58.69 +74:56:58.2   2640 4583   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88792_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88792_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.78    16:31:38.65 +76:57:37.7   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88852_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88852_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.43    15:48:07.60 +74:27:08.6   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88860_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88860_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.09    16:56:08.92 +76:45:02.1   2879 3517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88909_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88909_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.41    15:11:47.98 +74:35:53.8   6793 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88948_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88948_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.51    14:45:14.24 +76:30:14.9   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88969_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88969_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.95    17:23:07.12 +78:56:21.1   2368 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88976_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88976_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.17    17:07:16.22 +78:12:27.7   2709 2578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88991_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 88991_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.27    17:23:33.01 +81:05:09.3   2750 0776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89004_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89004_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.90    16:11:11.66 +74:36:39.9   4430 4955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89009_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89009_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.90    15:09:10.66 +80:39:15.2   5933 1095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89032_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89032_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.51    17:05:54.50 +80:18:14.6   3042 1351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89037_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89037_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.06    16:48:47.63 +73:39:17.9   2832 5415   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89066_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89066_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.78    15:57:43.49 +78:02:32.4   4849 2868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89068_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89068_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.04    15:21:05.45 +80:16:58.0   5696 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89070_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89070_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.17    17:30:17.17 +78:59:35.2   2180 1926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89075_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89075_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.29    17:04:04.47 +74:24:59.7   2293 4842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89083_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89083_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.51    16:59:16.80 +80:18:27.2   3208 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89084_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89084_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.03    16:04:48.89 +74:50:55.0   4682 4807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89091_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89091_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.50    17:10:37.30 +77:39:30.7   2525 2875   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89094_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89094_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.73    17:39:48.17 +80:17:23.4   2210 1096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89109_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89109_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.89    14:31:36.94 +77:59:08.7   7473 2251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89126_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89126_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.44    16:02:15.54 +79:24:19.3   4675 2052   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89128_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89128_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.96    17:31:21.23 +80:31:43.6   2462 1036   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89134_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89134_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.59    17:33:52.99 +79:30:28.6   2189 1597   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89137_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89137_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.92    17:05:46.85 +81:14:17.8   3175 0799   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89140_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89140_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.18    15:19:19.99 +76:02:52.6   6304 3874   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89147_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89147_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.69    17:36:05.14 +80:21:29.4   2314 1092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89151_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89151_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.72    17:14:40.14 +79:31:04.4   2698 1755   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89160_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89160_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.39    16:30:15.21 +79:33:49.1   3905 1941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89175_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89175_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.96    16:35:43.94 +81:29:55.5   3876 0759   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89182_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89182_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.41    14:53:35.76 +77:53:09.2   6846 2566   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89185_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 Preparing report for the candidate 89185_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89190_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89190_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    15.10    16:44:42.49 +78:19:56.5   3406 2635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89191_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89191_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.55    14:34:40.42 +79:43:06.6   6963 1328   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89195_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 89195_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    14.83    16:11:18.44 +76:30:43.5   4425 3805   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 61527_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 61527_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    9.50    14:45:26.35 +78:52:39.8   6875 1916   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits **** FOUND 14:45:26.30 +78:52:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85077_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 85077_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.88    16:23:23.50 +78:26:04.8   4058 2635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits **** FOUND 16:23:23.23 +78:26:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58639_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 58639_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    12.42    14:32:42.69 +79:17:08.9   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 19529_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 The candidate 19529_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.29824    2461326.79824    13.40    15:26:00.99 +75:34:12.1   6121 4208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_024425_TTUQ2b1x1_2223271_JvafocnU/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_02-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 16s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 15:35:18.89 +74:24:42.8 ########### Completed UMi-01-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 15:35:18.89 +74:24:42.8 ################################################################################### 15:35:18.89 +74:24:42.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 15:35:18.89 +74:24:42.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 15:35:18.89 +74:24:42.8 -- not a known variable star Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 15:35:18.89 +74:24:42.8 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461326.79779850 -observatory V36 14:44:44.82 -19:02:11.8 Mercury (0.0mag) 14:04:41.11 -20:41:15.9 Venus (-4.4mag) 08:44:19.23 +19:22:22.2 Mars (1.0mag) 09:35:34.51 +14:59:45.0 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:41:54.03 +01:33:30.3 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:11:52.74 +20:57:27.0 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:09.63 -00:26:48.0 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:09.88 -23:43:28.9 Pluto (14.5mag) 15:05:05.29 -22:54:13.3 Moon (-8.9mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 13 02:50 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461326.79779850: 09:35:28.80 +15:00:17.3 Io (6.1mag) 09:35:25.15 +15:00:37.6 Europa (6.2mag) 09:35:42.56 +14:59:00.7 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:35:26.11 +15:00:30.6 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:35:27.63 +15:19:43.2 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:35:33.04 +14:59:53.0 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:34:14.49 +15:21:50.1 Elara (17.5mag) 09:37:53.56 +14:22:42.5 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:34:02.56 +15:27:18.0 Carme (18.8mag) 00:41:40.33 +01:33:24.3 Titan (8.2mag) 00:41:47.14 +01:33:25.8 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:41:27.43 +01:30:44.6 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:41:43.20 +01:33:05.0 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:40:12.54 +01:21:08.7 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 13 02:51 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461326.79779850: 03:01:08.34 +21:16:52.7 JWST 15:03:31.53 +52:01:39.5 Chandra 11:58:12.77 -61:16:09.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 13 02:50 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461326.79779850 -observatory V36 03:45:33.10 +20:12:10.2 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:26:26.21 -33:27:04.1 14.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:40:33.88 -72:31:40.2 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:38.39 +34:42:22.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:55:28.30 +48:27:42.5 17.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:30:54.55 +25:26:23.0 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:02:49.37 +35:52:19.8 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:27:12.21 +41:26:35.9 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:46:16.69 -13:36:43.6 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:20:40.10 +15:50:15.5 16.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:52:54.95 -02:52:47.1 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:50:28.06 +64:26:28.5 15.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:33:58.29 +43:00:33.1 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:47:29.62 +14:27:18.1 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:29:29.63 -28:30:57.8 13.0mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 00:22:16.67 +18:42:33.5 17.6mag 2P/Encke 23:00:24.24 -31:16:15.6 14.6mag 10P/Tempel 02:13:25.57 +38:23:38.1 16.7mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:12:30.60 -08:19:06.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:21:13.14 -08:55:29.7 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:38:17.49 +15:48:24.5 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 02:58:08.11 +14:14:51.3 17.7mag 88P/Howell 07:45:55.26 +40:47:14.9 17.0mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:07:04.73 +13:27:43.6 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:44:55.99 +12:49:26.3 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 14:11:31.42 -32:45:16.1 17.9mag 124P/Mrkos 06:52:09.11 +19:13:32.5 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 21:23:57.59 +04:56:24.3 9.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:23:14.54 +01:12:14.6 14.4mag 169P/NEAT 03:28:15.36 +04:21:32.4 14.9mag 220P/McNaught 06:06:17.77 +45:38:04.9 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 07:30:22.94 +25:34:07.4 17.9mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Oct 13 02:50 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70 ASASSN-26fk 2026-10-5.53 -3.9 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 13 02:50 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 13 02:50 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 00:43:31.985 +02:44:37.26 AT 2026addl 2026-09-03.50 20.81 00:20:43.092 +26:18:27.76 AT 2026addk 2026-09-10.40 21.85 02:32:33.449 -04:05:50.65 AT 2026addj 2026-09-19.55 20.69 06:02:06.169 +54:33:49.98 AT 2026addi 2026-09-16.60 20.62 20:31:30.274 -11:28:55.06 AT 2026addh 2026-09-15.24 21.29 21:09:35.309 -38:50:41.60 AT 2026addg 2026-09-03.34 20.53 01:16:25.813 -15:10:04.62 AT 2026addf 2026-08-12.57 21.69 01:17:52.437 -16:01:42.48 AT 2026adde 2026-08-12.57 21.38 23:53:53.849 +06:58:03.97 AT 2026addd 2026-09-14.37 21.08 04:00:29.026 -25:19:51.60 AT 2026addc 2026-09-05.59 21.32 23:51:58.388 +36:11:37.62 AT 2026addb 2026-09-13.38 21.75 02:23:44.130 -38:09:01.15 AT 2026adda 2026-09-16.51 21.09 19:58:50.785 -31:34:29.11 AT 2026adcz 2026-09-04.28 21 02:18:02.958 +22:16:26.48 AT 2026adcy 2026-08-11.56 20.88 08:38:23.323 +70:03:08.09 AT 2026adcx 2026-09-27.96 17.18 17:24:20.450 -17:51:02.90 AT 2026adcw 2026-07-10.70 18.79 05:04:34.365 +59:08:46.08 AT 2026adcv 2026-09-10.48 20.4261 20:26:49.827 -26:30:11.24 AT 2026adcu 2026-08-13.38 20.9 03:37:43.530 -04:27:08.43 AT 2026adct 2026-09-11.59 21.54 21:46:53.026 -19:59:57.30 AT 2026adcs 2026-09-13.33 21.73 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 13 02:50 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 69 C