This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2255 2461326.7255 11.49 23:04:26.44 -04:28:44.0
69.79423 -55.88637 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.236 Honoria -0 -0 0 11.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:04:26.44 -04:28:44.0: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:04:26.44 -04:28:44.0: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7255,11.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2255 11.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2255 2461326.7255 12.71 23:27:52.74 -05:18:43.6
76.84229 -60.47399 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.317 Roxane -0 -0 0 12.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:52.74 -05:18:43.6: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:52.74 -05:18:43.6: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7255,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2255 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2255 2461326.7255 13.52 23:17:14.91 -02:37:43.7
76.28318 -56.71323 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.570 Kythera 0 -0 0 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:17:14.91 -02:37:43.7: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:17:14.91 -02:37:43.7: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7255,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2255 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2255 2461326.7255 13.51 23:15:19.32 -01:58:51.9
76.37753 -55.90801 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.328 Gudrun -0 0 0 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:19.32 -01:58:51.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:19.32 -01:58:51.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7255,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2255 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2255 2461326.7255 13.67 23:13:15.88 -04:34:59.7
72.51607 -57.50338 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.788 Hohensteina -0 0 0 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:13:15.88 -04:34:59.7: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:13:15.88 -04:34:59.7: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7255,13.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2255 13.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2255 2461326.7255 14.36 23:11:19.63 -01:49:50.1
75.21505 -55.14247 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.673 Edda -0 1 1 14.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:11:19.63 -01:49:50.1: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:11:19.63 -01:49:50.1: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7255,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2255 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2255 2461326.7255 14.43 23:34:31.64 -04:54:19.4
80.01350 -61.19396 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.223 Rosa 0 -0 0 14.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:31.64 -04:54:19.4: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:31.64 -04:54:19.4: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7255,14.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2255 14.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2255 2461326.7255 14.54 23:03:48.06 -00:36:56.4
74.19249 -52.98502 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1157 Arabia -1 0 1 14.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:03:48.06 -00:36:56.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:03:48.06 -00:36:56.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7255,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2255 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461326.72574646 13.10.2026 05:24:54.494 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4841
Objects passed selection criteria: 4839
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4721.75
Average stars matched: 4608.25 (97.5962 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231792 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 01:29:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461326.72574646 13.10.2026 05:24:54.494 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 210
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.06
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28718
Objects passed selection criteria: 28640
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27856
Average stars matched: 26672.2 (95.7505 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253164 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 01:32:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461326.72525037
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.453 -01:59:39.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:34.453 -01:59:39.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0135 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:32.931 -01:59:58.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:32.931 -01:59:58.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0107 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:34.453 -01:59:39.19
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:32.931 -01:59:58.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00825 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V9pU6YTsY8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8YaFqYJAwX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XZZ3oAKUxS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r5ovsyoEqN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.655300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.655300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to +3.2517 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to 3.2517 deg
Loaded 4385 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3695 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
2.2 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.V9pU6YTsY8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, bad_region=1637, passed=6415
Got 6415 stars (including 4478 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4346 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4337 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4337 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4337 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4346 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4338 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4338 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4338 stars left (next iteration limit 4770)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits N_match=4338 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1429 n_q2=758 n_q3=1353 n_q4=798 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.040
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8YaFqYJAwX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, bad_region=1607, passed=6260
Got 6260 stars (including 4361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4238 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4238 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4230 stars left (next iteration limit 4653)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits N_match=4230 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=1416 n_q2=724 n_q3=1303 n_q4=787 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XZZ3oAKUxS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=364, bad_region=1622, passed=6442
Got 6442 stars (including 4510 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6442 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4377 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4372 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4372 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5118 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4377 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4371 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5118 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4371 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5118 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4371 stars left (next iteration limit 4809)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4371 robust_rms=7.770 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.163 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.163 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4371 robust_rms=0.406 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.686 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.686 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4371 robust_rms=0.299 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.371 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.371 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4371 robust_rms_before=0.932 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.304 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.299 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.368 worst_region_rms_after=0.371 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.925 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.371
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.368 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.368 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.304 arcsec matched=4371
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits N_match=4371 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=1428 n_q2=806 n_q3=1318 n_q4=819 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.r5ovsyoEqN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=384, bad_region=1623, passed=6408
Got 6408 stars (including 4459 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4325 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4325 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4318 stars left (next iteration limit 4749)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4318 robust_rms=7.794 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.488 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.488 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4318 robust_rms=0.417 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.679 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.679 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4318 robust_rms=0.318 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.353 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.353 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4318 robust_rms_before=0.953 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.329 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.318 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.376 worst_region_rms_after=0.353 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.947 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.353
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.376 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.329 arcsec matched=4318
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits N_match=4318 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1414 n_q2=809 n_q3=1291 n_q4=804 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits sigma_overall=0.314 worst_q_ratio=1.040
ref2=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.063
new1=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits sigma_overall=0.315 worst_q_ratio=1.093
new2=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.084
reference average sigma_overall=0.3465 worst_q_ratio=1.0515
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017_astrometric_residuals.png (4338 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018_astrometric_residuals.png (4230 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260_astrometric_residuals.png (4371 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261_astrometric_residuals.png (4318 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:07:13.55 -01:29:21.4: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:07:28.78 -02:29:13.3: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:04:26.44 -04:28:44.0: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:21:26.72 -03:04:03.2: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:01:58.97 +00:24:25.0: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:21:26.72 -03:04:03.2: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:07:28.78 -02:29:13.3: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:26.72 -03:04:03.2: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7560 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:07:28.78 -02:29:13.3: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1780 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:04:26.44 -04:28:44.0: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:07:13.55 -01:29:21.4: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:07:13.55 -01:29:21.4: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0616 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:01:58.97 +00:24:25.0: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:58.97 +00:24:25.0: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0025 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20214.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20214_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
Preparing report for the candidate 20214_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20216_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 20216_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20217_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 20217_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20218_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 20218_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20221_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 20221_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 13s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:04:26.44 -04:28:44.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.453 -01:59:39.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:34.453 -01:59:39.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0135 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:32.931 -01:59:58.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:32.931 -01:59:58.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0107 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:34.453 -01:59:39.19
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:32.931 -01:59:58.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00825 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MgGrmq39pa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Sbnnr8jlGt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A6nQ6tvSaq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PGZ8kkMPaU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 35879 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to +3.2602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to 3.2602 deg
Loaded 4394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3893 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3893 out of 35879 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.537600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.537600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.06
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 35879 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to +3.2602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to 3.2602 deg
Loaded 4394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3893 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3893 out of 35879 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 36137 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2724 to 355.0227 deg, Dec -7.2779 to +3.2557 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2724 to 355.0227 deg, Dec -7.2779 to 3.2557 deg
Loaded 4393 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3594 out of 3890 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3890 out of 36137 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 123 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
2.1 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
15.5 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MgGrmq39pa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1717, bad_region=7702, passed=35853
Got 35853 stars (including 26731 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35853 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5337)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits N_match=4852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1558 n_q2=904 n_q3=1485 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.048
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Sbnnr8jlGt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=8, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1465, bad_region=7825, passed=36110
Got 36110 stars (including 27137 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36110 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5339)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=1577 n_q2=898 n_q3=1478 n_q4=901 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.A6nQ6tvSaq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1477, bad_region=6390, passed=34274
Got 34274 stars (including 26834 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34274 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4849 stars left (next iteration limit 5333)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4849 robust_rms=7.474 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.075 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.075 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4849 robust_rms=0.408 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.752 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.752 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4849 robust_rms=0.298 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.372 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.372 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4849 robust_rms_before=0.940 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.298 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.372 worst_region_rms_after=0.372 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.919 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.372
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.372 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.372 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.297 arcsec matched=4849
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits N_match=4849 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=1606 n_q2=871 n_q3=1503 n_q4=869 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.059
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.PGZ8kkMPaU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1528, bad_region=6482, passed=34483
Got 34483 stars (including 26955 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34483 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29463 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29463 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5327)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4843 robust_rms=7.472 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.055 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.055 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4843 robust_rms=0.415 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.732 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.732 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4843 robust_rms=0.317 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.351 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.351 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4843 robust_rms_before=0.957 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.327 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.317 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.379 worst_region_rms_after=0.351 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.930 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.351
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.379 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.379 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.327 arcsec matched=4843
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=1605 n_q2=872 n_q3=1501 n_q4=865 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0260.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_011826_TTUQ2b1x1_436141_7GaowpHS/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:24:26.45 +00:13:24.3: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:52.74 -05:18:43.6: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:14:52.00 -01:03:12.4: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:13:05.88 -01:08:43.3: 14.55 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:24:50.88 +00:27:20.5: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:26:38.17 -05:12:46.4: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:24:26.45 +00:13:24.3: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:13:05.88 -01:08:43.3: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:52.74 -05:18:43.6: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:26.45 +00:13:24.3: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6029 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:14:52.00 -01:03:12.4: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:13:05.88 -01:08:43.3: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5310 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:14:52.00 -01:03:12.4: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6499 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:24:50.88 +00:27:20.5: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:50.88 +00:27:20.5: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9943 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:26:38.17 -05:12:46.4: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:26:38.17 -05:12:46.4: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1017 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:24:17.18 -06:14:03.9: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:24:17.18 -06:14:03.9: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:17.18 -06:14:03.9: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3889 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:17:14.91 -02:37:43.7: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:19.32 -01:58:51.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:13:15.88 -04:34:59.7: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:17:14.91 -02:37:43.7: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:13:15.88 -04:34:59.7: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:19.32 -01:58:51.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:29.27 -00:58:11.0: 14.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:29.27 -00:58:11.0: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:29.27 -00:58:11.0: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0902 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:06.29 +00:02:55.7: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:21:22.48 -03:24:13.5: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:12.29 -03:02:20.3: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:06.29 +00:02:55.7: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:06.29 +00:02:55.7: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1112 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:39.18 -02:16:32.1: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:21:22.48 -03:24:13.5: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:22.48 -03:24:13.5: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1082 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:12.29 -03:02:20.3: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:12.29 -03:02:20.3: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3586 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:39.18 -02:16:32.1: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:39.18 -02:16:32.1: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2804 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:24.10 -05:55:30.7: 14.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:45.95 -06:08:44.2: 14.73 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:43.55 -02:57:43.1: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:23:59.08 +00:39:25.2: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:24.10 -05:55:30.7: 14.91 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:45.95 -06:08:44.2: 14.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:24.10 -05:55:30.7: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4089 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:45.95 -06:08:44.2: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5060 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:15.53 +00:36:02.6: 15.18 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:43.55 -02:57:43.1: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:43.55 -02:57:43.1: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4648 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:23:59.08 +00:39:25.2: 14.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:23:59.08 +00:39:25.2: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4573 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:45.61 -00:31:12.1: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:15.53 +00:36:02.6: 15.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:15.53 +00:36:02.6: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6230 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:45.61 -00:31:12.1: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:45.61 -00:31:12.1: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5056 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:11:19.63 -01:49:50.1: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:31.64 -04:54:19.4: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:21:23.07 -03:05:04.3: 14.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:11:19.63 -01:49:50.1: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:31.64 -04:54:19.4: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:12.05 -03:17:11.2: 14.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:21:23.07 -03:05:04.3: 14.37 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:23.07 -03:05:04.3: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3663 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:12.05 -03:17:11.2: 15.04 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:12.05 -03:17:11.2: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5665 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:29.48 -04:53:30.9: 15.07 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:21.71 -01:06:23.4: 14.85 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:29.48 -04:53:30.9: 14.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:29.48 -04:53:30.9: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6610 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:21.71 -01:06:23.4: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:47.96 -01:06:19.1: 14.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:21.71 -01:06:23.4: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5842 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:55.96 +00:18:37.4: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:47.96 -01:06:19.1: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:47.96 -01:06:19.1: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5737 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:53.20 -03:10:54.6: 15.00 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:14:34.37 +02:10:31.2: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:55.96 +00:18:37.4: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:55.96 +00:18:37.4: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6655 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:53.20 -03:10:54.6: 15.50 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:53.20 -03:10:54.6: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.6675 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:14:34.37 +02:10:31.2: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:14:34.37 +02:10:31.2: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5831 delta=-0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:09.24 +00:54:11.1: 15.08 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:25:44.82 +01:00:50.2: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:09.24 +00:54:11.1: 14.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:09.24 +00:54:11.1: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7120 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:01:51.80 -01:31:24.5: 14.39 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:14.47 +00:34:45.9: 15.13 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:25:44.82 +01:00:50.2: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:44.82 +01:00:50.2: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7466 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:03.25 -02:19:21.7: 15.10 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:01:51.80 -01:31:24.5: 14.59 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:51.80 -01:31:24.5: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4550 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:14.47 +00:34:45.9: 15.24 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:14.47 +00:34:45.9: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7655 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:27.91 +00:59:43.8: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:03.25 -02:19:21.7: 15.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:03.25 -02:19:21.7: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8100 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:27.91 +00:59:43.8: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:27.91 +00:59:43.8: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6148 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:03:48.06 -00:36:56.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:27.37 +00:45:45.0: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:36.73 -01:58:54.5: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:03:48.06 -00:36:56.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:27.37 +00:45:45.0: 15.13 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:27.37 +00:45:45.0: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5930 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:36.73 -01:58:54.5: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:36.73 -01:58:54.5: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6984 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:24.89 +01:03:34.6: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:33:02.69 +01:48:16.3: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:24:06.04 -06:07:24.0: 15.08 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:04.41 -06:03:00.5: 15.03 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:24.89 +01:03:34.6: 15.13 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:24.89 +01:03:34.6: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8051 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:33:44.81 -00:03:52.4: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:26:57.79 +02:03:01.8: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:24:06.04 -06:07:24.0: 15.27 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:06.04 -06:07:24.0: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8079 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:33:02.69 +01:48:16.3: 14.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:04.41 -06:03:00.5: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:35.24 -00:20:32.3: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:02.69 +01:48:16.3: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5167 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:04.41 -06:03:00.5: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6735 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:19.97 -06:09:08.7: 14.86 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:26:57.79 +02:03:01.8: 15.49 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:26:57.79 +02:03:01.8: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8617 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:33:44.81 -00:03:52.4: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:44.81 -00:03:52.4: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8096 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:35.24 -00:20:32.3: 15.26 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:35.24 -00:20:32.3: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6919 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:49.40 -06:04:05.9: 15.20 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:42.84 -05:46:32.2: 14.98 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:24.84 +00:13:45.6: 14.96 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:19.97 -06:09:08.7: 15.12 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:10.06 -02:20:23.1: 14.93 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:19.97 -06:09:08.7: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7640 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:17.71 -00:43:15.9: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:49.40 -06:04:05.9: 14.95 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:49.40 -06:04:05.9: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7996 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:17:12.01 -05:33:09.4: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:20.66 -04:22:30.7: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:24.84 +00:13:45.6: 14.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:24:18.23 -04:13:14.8: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:24.84 +00:13:45.6: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8488 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:42.84 -05:46:32.2: 14.70 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:42.84 -05:46:32.2: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7894 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:10.06 -02:20:23.1: 15.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:10.06 -02:20:23.1: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6948 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:17.71 -00:43:15.9: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:17.71 -00:43:15.9: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7084 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:33:16.14 -02:10:45.5: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:17:12.01 -05:33:09.4: 15.24 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:20.66 -04:22:30.7: 15.12 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:17:12.01 -05:33:09.4: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7896 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:20.66 -04:22:30.7: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8732 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:24:18.23 -04:13:14.8: 15.05 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:18.23 -04:13:14.8: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8410 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:12.57 -03:42:37.6: 15.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:06.17 -00:53:01.1: 15.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:05.17 -04:58:09.9: 15.07 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:33:16.14 -02:10:45.5: 14.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:16.14 -02:10:45.5: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8533 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:31.75 -03:41:17.7: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:12.57 -03:42:37.6: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:12.57 -03:42:37.6: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6753 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:58:38.37 -03:01:28.1: 15.49 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:06.17 -00:53:01.1: 15.10 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:06.17 -00:53:01.1: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7148 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:05.17 -04:58:09.9: 14.92 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:05.17 -04:58:09.9: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7379 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:31.75 -03:41:17.7: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:31.75 -03:41:17.7: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7818 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:58:38.37 -03:01:28.1: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:58:38.37 -03:01:28.1: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8345 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52545.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52608.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52611.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52617.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52746.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52748.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52831.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52512_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52512_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52513_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52513_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52517_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52517_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52524_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52524_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52529_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52529_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:04:26.44 -04:28:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52530_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52530_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52536_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52536_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52541_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52541_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52544_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52544_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52545_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
Preparing report for the candidate 52545_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52546_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52546_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52548_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52548_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52557_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52557_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52559_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52559_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52566_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52566_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52588_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52588_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52590_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52590_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52597_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52597_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52600_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52600_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52608_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
Preparing report for the candidate 52608_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52609_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52609_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52611_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
Preparing report for the candidate 52611_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52612_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52612_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52615_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52615_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52617_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
Preparing report for the candidate 52617_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52622_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52622_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52625_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52625_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52630_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52630_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52634_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52634_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52638_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52638_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52640_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52640_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52652_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52652_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52656_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52656_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52663_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52663_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52670_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52670_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52674_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52674_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52685_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52685_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52686_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52686_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52687_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52687_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52688_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52688_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52691_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52691_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52694_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52694_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52695_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52695_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52699_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52699_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52705_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52705_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52707_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52707_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52709_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52709_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52711_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52711_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52716_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52716_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52719_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52719_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52721_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52721_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52722_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52722_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52723_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52723_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52727_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52727_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52728_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52728_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52731_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52731_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52735_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52735_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52736_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52736_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52739_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52739_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52741_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52741_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52742_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52742_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52743_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52743_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52746_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
Preparing report for the candidate 52746_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52748_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
Preparing report for the candidate 52748_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52750_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52750_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52752_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52752_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52753_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52753_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52754_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52754_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52757_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52757_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52759_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52759_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52760_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52760_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52761_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52761_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52763_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52763_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52764_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52764_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52766_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52766_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52767_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52767_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52775_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52775_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52776_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52776_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52777_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52777_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52782_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52782_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52785_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52785_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52786_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52786_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52799_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52799_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52806_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52806_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52810_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52810_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52811_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52811_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52816_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52816_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52819_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52819_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52823_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52823_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52830_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52830_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52831_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
Preparing report for the candidate 52831_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52838_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52838_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52841_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52841_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52842_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52842_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52843_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52843_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52844_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52844_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52847_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52847_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52849_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52849_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52855_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52855_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52856_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52856_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52858_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52858_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52860_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52860_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52864_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52864_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52866_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52866_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52867_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52867_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52868_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52868_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52870_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52870_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52872_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52872_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52873_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52873_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52874_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52874_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52875_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52875_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52882_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52882_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52883_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52883_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52891_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52891_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52892_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52892_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52898_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52898_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52902_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52902_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52906_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52906_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52929_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52929_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52947_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52947_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52952_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 52952_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09892_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 09892_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15910_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261
The candidate 15910_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0261 did not pass the final checks
