This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2505 2461326.7505 10.89 02:05:01.05 -12:04:49.6
175.42454 -67.10832 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.532 Herculina -1 -1 1 10.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:05:01.05 -12:04:49.6: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:05:01.05 -12:04:49.6: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2505* 02 05 01.05 -12 04 49.6 10.9 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7505,10.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2505 10.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2505 2461326.7505 11.94 02:06:22.26 -06:28:08.5
167.07523 -62.72878 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.360 Carlova -0 0 0 12.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:06:22.26 -06:28:08.5: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:06:22.26 -06:28:08.5: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2505* 02 06 22.26 -06 28 08.5 11.9 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7505,11.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2505 11.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2505 2461326.7505 12.42 01:24:04.21 -13:24:51.9
153.61998 -74.30837 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.166 Rhodope -1 -0 1 12.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:24:04.21 -13:24:51.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:24:04.21 -13:24:51.9: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2505* 01 24 04.21 -13 24 51.9 12.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7505,12.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2505 12.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2505 2461326.7505 13.51 01:25:24.27 -06:36:28.4
145.93142 -67.94990 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.783 Nora -1 0 1 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:25:24.27 -06:36:28.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:25:24.27 -06:36:28.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2505* 01 25 24.27 -06 36 28.4 13.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7505,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2505 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2505 2461326.7505 13.85 02:07:06.68 -09:07:06.0
171.26767 -64.62666 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.891 Gunhild -1 0 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:07:06.68 -09:07:06.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:07:06.68 -09:07:06.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2505* 02 07 06.68 -09 07 06.0 13.8 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7505,13.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2505 13.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.64392579 23.12.2025 03:27:05.188 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
First image: 2461032.64392579 23.12.2025 03:27:05.188 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Last image: 2461326.75073183 13.10.2026 06:00:53.230 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5455
Objects passed selection criteria: 5449
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5070
Average stars matched: 4946.25 (97.5592 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231760 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 01:08:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.64392579 23.12.2025 03:27:05.188 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
First image: 2461032.64392579 23.12.2025 03:27:05.188 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Last image: 2461326.75073183 13.10.2026 06:00:53.230 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 143
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27209
Objects passed selection criteria: 27143
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24014.2
Average stars matched: 23292.5 (96.9945 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 250636 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 01:09:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461326.75020999
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:51.887 -10:01:12.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:45.724 -10:00:45.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:42:51.887 -10:01:12.35
Second-epoch image center 01:42:45.724 -10:00:45.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0263 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:43.977 -10:00:46.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:42:51.887 -10:01:12.35
Second-epoch image center 01:42:43.977 -10:00:46.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0333 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:42:45.724 -10:00:45.70
Second-epoch second image center 01:42:43.977 -10:00:46.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00717 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Tu1mrrj6tr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits &> /tmp/tmp.syfwfsG1hB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sxbmZjiitN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cbFlG5uYVq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits and wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits and wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits and wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5413 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.6951 to 33.9052 deg, Dec -15.3338 to -4.6054 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.6951 to 33.9052 deg, Dec -15.3338 to -4.6054 deg
Loaded 4186 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3306 out of 3435 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3435 out of 5413 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5413 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.6951 to 33.9052 deg, Dec -15.3338 to -4.6054 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.6951 to 33.9052 deg, Dec -15.3338 to -4.6054 deg
Loaded 4186 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3306 out of 3435 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3435 out of 5413 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (aperture=5.8)
Read 5432 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.7140 to 33.9201 deg, Dec -15.3337 to -4.6054 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.7140 to 33.9201 deg, Dec -15.3337 to -4.6054 deg
Loaded 4184 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3435 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3435 out of 5432 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
2.0 pix Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
3.4 pix fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
3.4 pix fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
15.4 mag. Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Tu1mrrj6tr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=369, bad_region=0, passed=5413
Got 5413 stars (including 5039 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5413 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.240 n_q1=1185 n_q2=1227 n_q3=1231 n_q4=1250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits -region wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.syfwfsG1hB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=371, bad_region=0, passed=5432
Got 5432 stars (including 5057 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5432 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=1186 n_q2=1241 n_q3=1226 n_q4=1237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits -region wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.sxbmZjiitN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=248, bad_region=0, passed=4786
Got 4786 stars (including 4537 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4786 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4447 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4441 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4441 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4448 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4442 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4442 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4442 stars left (next iteration limit 4885)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4442 robust_rms=13.483 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.197 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.197 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4442 robust_rms=0.457 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.656 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.656 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4442 robust_rms=0.317 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.426 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.426 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4442 robust_rms_before=0.871 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.287 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.317 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.416 worst_region_rms_after=0.426 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.949 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.426
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.416 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.287 arcsec matched=4442
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits N_match=4442 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1103 n_q2=1039 n_q3=1114 n_q4=1186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.189
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.cbFlG5uYVq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=254, bad_region=0, passed=4781
Got 4781 stars (including 4523 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4781 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4439 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4435 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4435 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4435 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4440 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4436 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4436 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4436 stars left (next iteration limit 4878)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4436 robust_rms=13.606 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.651 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.651 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4436 robust_rms=0.462 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.680 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.680 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4436 robust_rms=0.307 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.404 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.404 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4436 robust_rms_before=0.896 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.291 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.307 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.404 worst_region_rms_after=0.404 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.964 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.404
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.404 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.404 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.291 arcsec matched=4436
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits N_match=4436 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.241 n_q1=1082 n_q2=1042 n_q3=1113 n_q4=1199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits sigma_overall=0.269 worst_q_ratio=1.279
ref2=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits sigma_overall=0.266 worst_q_ratio=1.256
new1=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits sigma_overall=0.290 worst_q_ratio=1.189
new2=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.193
reference average sigma_overall=0.2675 worst_q_ratio=1.2675
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (4442 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251_astrometric_residuals.png (4436 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:44:35.62 -08:17:58.4: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:42:46.77 -10:34:39.3: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:06:22.26 -06:28:08.5: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:46:12.69 -09:51:38.2: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:44:31.99 -09:43:33.5: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:43:28.13 -08:55:25.0: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:00:40.54 -08:35:46.1: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:52:33.45 -10:55:01.5: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:05:01.05 -12:04:49.6: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:49:33.84 -06:48:00.0: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:00:40.54 -08:35:46.1: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:46:12.69 -09:51:38.2: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:05:01.05 -12:04:49.6: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:44:35.62 -08:17:58.4: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:44:31.99 -09:43:33.5: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:06:22.26 -06:28:08.5: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:42:46.77 -10:34:39.3: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:52:33.45 -10:55:01.5: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:43:28.13 -08:55:25.0: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:00:40.54 -08:35:46.1: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1840 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:46:12.69 -09:51:38.2: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2024 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:44:35.62 -08:17:58.4: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1693 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:44:31.99 -09:43:33.5: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1780 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:42:46.77 -10:34:39.3: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1189 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:52:33.45 -10:55:01.5: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1511 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:43:28.13 -08:55:25.0: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1576 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:49:33.84 -06:48:00.0: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:49:33.84 -06:48:00.0: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2158 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:43:19.56 -08:55:34.2: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:42:59.80 -09:09:46.3: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:43:19.56 -08:55:34.2: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:42:59.80 -09:09:46.3: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:43:19.56 -08:55:34.2: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2265 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:42:59.80 -09:09:46.3: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2240 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20280.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20363.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20280_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 20280_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20363_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 20363_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20386_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20386_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:45:16.18 -08:24:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20393_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20393_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20398_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20398_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20400_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20400_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20401_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20401_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20403_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20403_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20407_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20407_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20408_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20408_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20412_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20412_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20416_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20416_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20417_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20417_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
02:05:01.05 -12:04:49.6
02:06:22.26 -06:28:08.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:51.887 -10:01:12.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:45.724 -10:00:45.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:42:51.887 -10:01:12.35
Second-epoch image center 01:42:45.724 -10:00:45.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0263 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:43.977 -10:00:46.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:42:51.887 -10:01:12.35
Second-epoch image center 01:42:43.977 -10:00:46.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0333 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:42:45.724 -10:00:45.70
Second-epoch second image center 01:42:43.977 -10:00:46.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00717 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MB4UqgB8LO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XJMVWJKs9h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oq5om3C6GH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5xaerj6g2y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits and wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits and wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits and wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.6948 to 33.9309 deg, Dec -15.3404 to -4.5625 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.6948 to 33.9309 deg, Dec -15.3404 to -4.5625 deg
Loaded 4228 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3275 out of 3520 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3520 out of 28292 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.828500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.828500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.6948 to 33.9309 deg, Dec -15.3404 to -4.5625 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.6948 to 33.9309 deg, Dec -15.3404 to -4.5625 deg
Loaded 4228 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3275 out of 3520 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3520 out of 28292 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 28381 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.6971 to 33.9326 deg, Dec -15.3394 to -4.5622 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.6971 to 33.9326 deg, Dec -15.3394 to -4.5622 deg
Loaded 4228 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3270 out of 3519 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3519 out of 28381 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 125 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
1.9 pix Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
3.1 pix fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
3.1 pix fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
15.6 mag. Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MB4UqgB8LO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1018, bad_region=4, passed=28287
Got 28287 stars (including 27224 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28287 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=1255 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1251 n_q4=1190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits -region wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XJMVWJKs9h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1046, bad_region=4, passed=28368
Got 28368 stars (including 27282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28368 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.230 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1255 n_q2=1189 n_q3=1250 n_q4=1206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits -region wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.oq5om3C6GH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=675, bad_region=25, passed=20131
Got 20131 stars (including 19405 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20131 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=13.309 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.080 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.080 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.457 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.694 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.694 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.325 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.433 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.433 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4889 robust_rms_before=0.874 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.325 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.420 worst_region_rms_after=0.433 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.954 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.433
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.420 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.420 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.294 arcsec matched=4889
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1188 n_q2=1136 n_q3=1239 n_q4=1326 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5xaerj6g2y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=664, bad_region=27, passed=20038
Got 20038 stars (including 19327 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20038 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=13.400 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.930 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.930 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.468 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.726 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.726 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.313 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.408 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.408 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4882 robust_rms_before=0.895 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.313 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.396 worst_region_rms_after=0.408 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.962 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.408
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.396 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.396 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.294 arcsec matched=4882
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.245 n_q1=1174 n_q2=1130 n_q3=1257 n_q4=1321 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_010141_TTUQ1b1x1_1549652_1H1gE8XZ/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:24:04.21 -13:24:51.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:52:45.47 -12:42:23.4: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:24:04.21 -13:24:51.9: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:25:24.27 -06:36:28.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:21:57.32 -07:11:43.0: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:07:06.68 -09:07:06.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:32:45.26 -07:40:24.5: 14.96 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:52:45.47 -12:42:23.4: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:07:06.68 -09:07:06.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:25:24.27 -06:36:28.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:21:57.32 -07:11:43.0: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:32:45.26 -07:40:24.5: 14.86 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:52:45.47 -12:42:23.4: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0356 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:57.32 -07:11:43.0: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0626 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:32:45.26 -07:40:24.5: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6046 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32078.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32317.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32463.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31916_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 31916_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31926_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 31926_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:05:01.05 -12:04:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31934_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 31934_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31984_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 31984_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31991_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 31991_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31996_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 31996_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31998_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 31998_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32013_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32013_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32015_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32015_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:06:22.26 -06:28:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32026_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32026_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32041_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32041_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32058_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32058_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32069_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32069_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32077_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32077_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32078_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 32078_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32092_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32092_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32099_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32099_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32106_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32106_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32124_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32124_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:31:51.32 -04:57:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32149_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32149_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32153_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32153_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32159_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32159_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32168_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32168_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32175_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32175_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32204_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32204_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32217_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32217_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32229_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32229_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32240_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32240_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32242_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32242_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32243_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32243_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32246_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32246_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32250_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32250_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32252_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32252_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32254_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32254_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32261_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32261_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32262_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32262_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32266_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32266_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32272_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32272_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32274_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32274_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32280_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32280_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:54:25.88 -11:51:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32290_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32290_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32311_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32311_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32317_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 32317_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32322_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32322_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32325_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32325_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32328_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32328_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32332_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32332_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32336_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32336_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32369_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32369_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32375_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32375_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32378_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32378_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32386_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32386_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32388_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32388_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32389_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32389_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32395_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32395_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32404_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32404_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32408_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32408_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32413_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32413_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32419_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32419_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32420_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32420_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32430_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32430_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32435_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32435_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32445_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32445_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32450_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32450_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32451_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32451_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32453_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32453_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32457_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32457_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32458_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32458_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32460_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32460_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32463_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 32463_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32471_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32471_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32480_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32480_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32482_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32482_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:23:53.98 -05:48:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32483_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32483_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32487_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32487_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32491_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32491_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32493_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32493_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32495_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32495_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32519_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32519_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32526_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32526_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32530_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32530_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32532_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32532_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32534_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32534_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32538_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32538_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32540_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32540_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32543_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32543_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32551_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32551_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32560_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32560_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32568_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32568_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32570_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32570_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32578_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32578_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32590_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32590_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32591_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32591_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32592_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32592_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32598_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32598_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32599_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32599_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32602_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32602_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32615_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32615_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32621_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32621_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32622_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32622_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32627_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32627_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32629_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32629_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32630_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32630_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32633_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32633_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32641_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32641_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32647_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32647_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32652_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32652_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32661_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32661_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32662_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32662_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32664_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32664_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32665_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32665_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32667_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32667_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32668_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32668_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32684_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32684_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32687_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32687_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32689_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32689_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32691_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32691_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32692_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32692_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32702_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32702_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32704_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32704_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32705_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32705_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32708_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32708_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32710_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32710_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32717_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32717_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25898_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 25898_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-00-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
