This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2180* 05 21 07.63 +23 38 19.9 10.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461326.7180,10.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261013.2180 10.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2180 2461326.7180 10.99 05:20:38.20 +23:29:30.7
181.54647 -7.65604 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 1 0 1 11.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:38.20 +23:29:30.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:38.20 +23:29:30.7: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2180* 05 20 38.20 +23 29 30.7 11.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7180,10.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2180 10.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2180 2461326.7180 11.96 05:06:27.73 +26:08:49.7
177.48379 -8.76208 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -0 -0 0 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:06:27.73 +26:08:49.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:06:27.73 +26:08:49.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2180* 05 06 27.73 +26 08 49.7 12.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7180,11.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2180 11.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2180* 05 21 07.63 +23 38 20.0 11.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461326.7180,10.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261013.2180 10.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2180 2461326.7180 12.95 05:17:44.31 +21:09:22.2
183.12295 -9.52017 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -0 0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:44.31 +21:09:22.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:44.31 +21:09:22.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2180* 05 17 44.31 +21 09 22.2 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7180,12.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2180 12.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2180 2461326.7180 12.60 06:04:21.02 +25:10:54.4
185.34631 1.70203 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia 1 -1 2 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:04:21.02 +25:10:54.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:04:21.02 +25:10:54.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7180,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2180 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2180 2461326.7180 13.90 05:03:33.74 +24:55:16.6
178.09399 -10.01435 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.418 Alemannia -1 -1 1 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:03:33.74 +24:55:16.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:03:33.74 +24:55:16.6: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2180* 05 03 33.74 +24 55 16.6 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7180,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2180 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2180 2461326.7180 13.24 05:28:44.43 +24:57:18.4
181.35141 -5.30727 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 7.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J052844.51+245719.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.420 V 15.080 V 2458562.48770 108.873113500000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:28:44.43 +24:57:18.4: 14.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:28:44.43 +24:57:18.4: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2180* 05 28 44.43 +24 57 18.4 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J052844.51+245719.0,2461326.7180,13.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J052844.51+245719.0 20261013.2180 13.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2180 2461326.7180 12.91 05:54:57.27 +21:14:23.2
187.69252 -2.13130 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J055457.28+211423.6
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.150 V 14.520 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:54:57.27 +21:14:23.2: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:54:57.27 +21:14:23.2: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2180* 05 54 57.27 +21 14 23.2 12.9 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J055457.28+211423.6,2461326.7180,12.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J055457.28+211423.6 20261013.2180 12.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2180 2461326.7180 12.54 05:11:55.26 +18:05:20.8
184.92324 -12.37664 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0511551+180520
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.170 r Y 0.726 r 2458469.70010 140.322633800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:11:55.26 +18:05:20.8: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:11:55.26 +18:05:20.8: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2180* 05 11 55.26 +18 05 20.8 12.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0511551+180520,2461326.7180,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0511551+180520 20261013.2180 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2180 2461326.7180 11.87 05:17:42.44 +21:41:23.1
182.67122 -9.22671 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J0517423+214125
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.888 R1 Y 0.404 R1 730.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:42.44 +21:41:23.1: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:42.44 +21:41:23.1: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2180* 05 17 42.44 +21 41 23.1 11.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0517423+214125,2461326.7180,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0517423+214125 20261013.2180 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2180 2461326.7180 11.85 05:30:09.85 +20:53:05.7
184.96553 -7.24881 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.1" and 9.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J053009.94+205302.7
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.970 V 13.500 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:09.85 +20:53:05.7: 12.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:09.85 +20:53:05.7: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2180* 05 30 09.85 +20 53 05.7 11.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J053009.94+205302.7,2461326.7180,11.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J053009.94+205302.7 20261013.2180 11.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2180 2461326.7180 11.51 05:48:08.49 +18:09:05.9
189.54287 -5.08050 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J054809+1809.0
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.960 V Y 0.530 V 2452854.30000 96.922178000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:48:08.49 +18:09:05.9: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:48:08.49 +18:09:05.9: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2180* 05 48 08.49 +18 09 05.9 11.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J054809+1809.0,2461326.7180,11.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J054809+1809.0 20261013.2180 11.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2180 2461326.7180 13.70 05:18:23.85 +21:11:31.4
183.18005 -9.37280 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0518244+211137
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.130 r Y 0.576 r 2458450.27750 116.031845600000
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula 553 129 568 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:18:23.85 +21:11:31.4: 14.96 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:18:23.85 +21:11:31.4: 14.70 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2180* 05 18 23.85 +21 11 31.4 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0518244+211137,2461326.7180,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0518244+211137 20261013.2180 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2180 2461326.7180 11.18 05:33:29.08 +24:27:01.3
182.36498 -4.67778 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSV 2118
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.930 V Y 0.360 V 2452853.40000 136.284083000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:33:29.08 +24:27:01.3: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:33:29.08 +24:27:01.3: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2180* 05 33 29.08 +24 27 01.3 11.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 2118,2461326.7180,11.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 2118 20261013.2180 11.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2180 2461326.7180 13.03 05:39:39.80 +19:02:13.0
187.73716 -6.34190 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ZTF J053939.61+190213.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.235 g Y 0.509 g 2458210.23350 381.126108000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:39:39.80 +19:02:13.0: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:39:39.80 +19:02:13.0: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2180* 05 39 39.80 +19 02 13.0 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J053939.61+190213.7,2461326.7180,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J053939.61+190213.7 20261013.2180 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2180 2461326.7180 10.80 05:30:53.43 +23:34:15.3
182.78529 -5.65203 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J053053+2334.3
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.180 V Y 0.500 V 2452837.40000 118.539592000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:53.43 +23:34:15.3: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:53.43 +23:34:15.3: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2180* 05 30 53.43 +23 34 15.3 10.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J053053+2334.3,2461326.7180,10.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J053053+2334.3 20261013.2180 10.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2180 2461326.7180 13.03 05:43:05.18 +22:47:15.4
184.94881 -3.69762 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" Gaia DR3 3403562196815701504
Type: SR|M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.290 G 12.500 G 674.600000000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:05.18 +22:47:15.4: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:05.18 +22:47:15.4: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2180* 05 43 05.18 +22 47 15.4 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3403562196815701504,2461326.7180,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3403562196815701504 20261013.2180 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461326.71862904 13.10.2026 05:14:39.549 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 19
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20345
Objects passed selection criteria: 20269
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16088.5
Average stars matched: 15863.2 (98.5999 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249756 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 00:23:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461326.71862904 13.10.2026 05:14:39.549 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 201
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 76 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 150815
Objects passed selection criteria: 150427
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 112637
Average stars matched: 109079 (96.8412 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 616236 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 00:26:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461326.71744940
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Image size: 944.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.376 +21:56:43.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:20.376 +21:56:43.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0541 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:17.778 +21:57:17.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:17.778 +21:57:17.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0452 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:20.376 +21:56:43.18
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:17.778 +21:57:17.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01375 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.N3wjFhjHZq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IkzBVUDwul
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IarZ518HoU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4syzkhR2ec
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
3.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
3.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.N3wjFhjHZq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.IkzBVUDwul (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4715 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4715 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=906 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.IarZ518HoU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=409, bad_region=1, passed=10319
Got 10319 stars (including 9906 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10319 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 588 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4731 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 588 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4794 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4729 stars left (next iteration limit 5200)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4729 robust_rms=10.099 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.228 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.228 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4729 robust_rms=0.761 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.218 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.218 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4729 robust_rms=0.533 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.808 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.808 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4729 robust_rms_before=1.522 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.515 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.533 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.901 worst_region_rms_after=0.808 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.056 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.808
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.461 +21:56:41.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10319 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4028787.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.522 -> 0.533 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4729 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 588 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4477 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4477 pairs (4729 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4477 robust_rms=9.825 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.178 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.178 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4477 robust_rms=0.751 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.191 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.191 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4477 robust_rms=0.517 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.785 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.785 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4477 robust_rms_before=0.521 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.521 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.517 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.785 worst_region_rms_after=0.785 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.785 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.785
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.785 vs 0.785 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4477 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4477 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits N_match=4477 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.672 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.547 n_q1=984 n_q2=1204 n_q3=857 n_q4=1432 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4syzkhR2ec (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=444, bad_region=0, passed=10495
Got 10495 stars (including 10049 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4791 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4791 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4727 stars left (next iteration limit 5198)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=10.302 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.177 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.177 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=0.784 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.283 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.283 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=0.528 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.849 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.849 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4727 robust_rms_before=1.332 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.504 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.528 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.884 worst_region_rms_after=0.849 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.872 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.849
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.884 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.884 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.504 arcsec matched=4727
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits N_match=4727 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.446 n_q1=1019 n_q2=1297 n_q3=890 n_q4=1521 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.488 worst_q_ratio=1.234
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits sigma_overall=0.530 worst_q_ratio=1.268
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits sigma_overall=0.493 worst_q_ratio=1.240
reference average sigma_overall=0.4325 worst_q_ratio=1.2345
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4715 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210_astrometric_residuals.png (4477 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211_astrometric_residuals.png (4727 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:38.20 +23:29:30.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:06:27.73 +26:08:49.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:06:27.73 +26:08:49.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:38.20 +23:29:30.7: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30738.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30839.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30733_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 30733_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30738_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 30738_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 30839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30852_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 30852_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:37.35 +20:19:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30072_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 30072_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:49.42 +23:06:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 07601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:58.82 +23:30:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:04.07 +20:30:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.19 +17:53:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11829_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 11829_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.89 +21:13:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.44 +17:54:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03444_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 03444_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.83 +25:25:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22152_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 22152_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:40.80 +16:57:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:49.00 +20:10:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 20601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.11 +17:45:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.45 +20:22:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.37 +23:51:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14002_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 14002_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.39 +20:16:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07308_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 07308_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:07.06 +23:15:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14077_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 14077_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.13 +20:08:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 20s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:20:38.20 +23:29:30.7
05:06:27.73 +26:08:49.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.461 +21:56:41.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:20.461 +21:56:41.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0546 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:17.778 +21:57:17.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:17.778 +21:57:17.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0452 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:20.461 +21:56:41.74
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:17.778 +21:57:17.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01427 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3Fx6W8hD6G
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t8bW6XJM39
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bc3XmlUm8f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DD5a2pBAaT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 189 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
3.2 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
3.2 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3Fx6W8hD6G (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.t8bW6XJM39 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4710 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4710 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=977 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bc3XmlUm8f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=3511, bad_region=21, passed=60763
Got 60763 stars (including 57176 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60763 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5186)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4713 robust_rms=10.370 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.347 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.347 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4713 robust_rms=0.758 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.142 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.142 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4713 robust_rms=0.528 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.786 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.786 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4713 robust_rms_before=0.527 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.486 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.528 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.800 worst_region_rms_after=0.786 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.800 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.786
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.800 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.800 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.486 arcsec matched=4713
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.432 n_q1=1049 n_q2=1192 n_q3=946 n_q4=1526 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DD5a2pBAaT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=3711, bad_region=24, passed=61718
Got 61718 stars (including 57928 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61718 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4779 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4780 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4717 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4717 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4717 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4717 robust_rms=10.522 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.593 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.593 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4717 robust_rms=0.780 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.198 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.198 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4717 robust_rms=0.524 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.850 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.850 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4717 robust_rms_before=1.329 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.495 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.524 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.873 worst_region_rms_after=0.850 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.872 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.850
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.873 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.873 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.495 arcsec matched=4717
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits N_match=4717 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.607 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.441 n_q1=1035 n_q2=1234 n_q3=930 n_q4=1518 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-12-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001526_TTUQ1b1x1_2848754_lYxXwisA/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:08:44.72 +25:54:24.9: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:06.33 +19:22:42.8: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:53:55.23 +16:53:05.6: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:08:44.72 +25:54:24.9: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:53:55.23 +16:53:05.6: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:44.72 +25:54:24.9: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4176 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:55.23 +16:53:05.6: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6970 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:06.33 +19:22:42.8: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:06.33 +19:22:42.8: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0344 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:07:15.59 +25:16:11.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:05:41.78 +23:02:26.9: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:37.01 +25:05:44.1: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:07:15.59 +25:16:11.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:15.59 +25:16:11.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:44.31 +21:09:22.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:05:41.78 +23:02:26.9: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:37.01 +25:05:44.1: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:41.78 +23:02:26.9: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7262 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:37.01 +25:05:44.1: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4984 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:44.31 +21:09:22.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:35:02.30 +24:18:47.6: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:35:02.30 +24:18:47.6: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:02.30 +24:18:47.6: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8028 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:04:21.02 +25:10:54.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:11:25.36 +24:24:28.2: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:04:21.02 +25:10:54.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:11:25.36 +24:24:28.2: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:25.36 +24:24:28.2: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2876 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:02.99 +18:33:59.3: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.67 +25:20:29.5: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:37.09 +25:25:08.7: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:02.99 +18:33:59.3: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:02.99 +18:33:59.3: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7802 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:07:52.53 +27:10:51.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.67 +25:20:29.5: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.67 +25:20:29.5: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2609 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:59.79 +22:34:32.2: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:37.09 +25:25:08.7: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:43:37.09 +25:25:08.7: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1062 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:07:52.53 +27:10:51.7: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:52.53 +27:10:51.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:59.79 +22:34:32.2: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:59.79 +22:34:32.2: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8853 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:45.75 +21:33:02.4: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:45.75 +21:33:02.4: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:45.75 +21:33:02.4: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5823 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:15.62 +25:11:37.2: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:03:33.74 +24:55:16.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:15.62 +25:11:37.2: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:15.62 +25:11:37.2: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4665 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:03:33.74 +24:55:16.6: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:23.36 +25:19:56.4: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:23.36 +25:19:56.4: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:23.36 +25:19:56.4: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6841 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:28:44.43 +24:57:18.4: 14.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:28:44.43 +24:57:18.4: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:28:44.43 +24:57:18.4: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2456 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:54:57.27 +21:14:23.2: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:54:57.27 +21:14:23.2: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:54:57.27 +21:14:23.2: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8842 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:11:55.26 +18:05:20.8: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:11:55.26 +18:05:20.8: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:11:55.26 +18:05:20.8: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5352 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:54.54 +21:13:24.2: 13.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:54.54 +21:13:24.2: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:42.44 +21:41:23.1: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:42:54.54 +21:13:24.2: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2431 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:42.44 +21:41:23.1: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:17:42.44 +21:41:23.1: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8658 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:09.85 +20:53:05.7: 12.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:09.85 +20:53:05.7: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:30:09.85 +20:53:05.7: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8407 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:28:11.17 +23:17:26.0: 14.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:28:11.17 +23:17:26.0: 14.53 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:28:11.17 +23:17:26.0: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4098 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:48:08.49 +18:09:05.9: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:18:23.85 +21:11:31.4: 14.96 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:33:58.90 +22:54:40.8: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:48:08.49 +18:09:05.9: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:48:08.49 +18:09:05.9: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5092 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:18:23.85 +21:11:31.4: 14.70 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:18:23.85 +21:11:31.4: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6982 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:33:58.90 +22:54:40.8: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:58.90 +22:54:40.8: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3158 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:33:29.08 +24:27:01.3: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:33:29.08 +24:27:01.3: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:33:29.08 +24:27:01.3: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1786 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:39:39.80 +19:02:13.0: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:55:55.94 +22:51:48.9: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:53.43 +23:34:15.3: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:39:39.80 +19:02:13.0: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:39:39.80 +19:02:13.0: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0147 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:53.43 +23:34:15.3: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:05.18 +22:47:15.4: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:55:55.94 +22:51:48.9: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:30:53.43 +23:34:15.3: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8066 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:55.94 +22:51:48.9: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8185 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:05.18 +22:47:15.4: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:43:05.18 +22:47:15.4: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0243 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:03.46 +23:09:47.0: 14.79 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:03.46 +23:09:47.0: 15.84 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:43:03.46 +23:09:47.0: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5862 delta=1.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:24.39 +16:57:51.7: 10.52 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:24.39 +16:57:51.7: 10.52 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.52 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:42:24.39 +16:57:51.7: ref_mag=10.52 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.6273 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out60104.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101041.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out122228.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out124601.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out137813.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191155.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191273.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191633.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34058.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out42475.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56966.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65952.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86534.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91628.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out95211.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 23s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190557_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190557_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190569_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190569_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:30.49 +20:35:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:54.95 +24:31:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190588_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190588_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190590_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190590_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:21.87 +23:00:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:48.89 +25:31:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190612_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190612_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:29.70 +16:41:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190663_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190663_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:58.94 +26:19:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190666_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 190666_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190672_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190672_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:38.20 +23:29:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190768_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190768_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:27.72 +26:08:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190889_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190889_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.13 +22:38:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190932_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190932_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.84 +23:48:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190940_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190940_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.89 +25:55:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190950_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190950_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.65 +22:27:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190953_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190953_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.93 +26:25:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190965_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190965_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191005_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191005_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191074_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191074_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:10.03 +18:33:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191076_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191076_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.78 +19:34:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191098_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191098_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191155_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 191155_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191167_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191167_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:52.87 +23:55:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191179_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191179_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.12 +23:12:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191191_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191191_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191201_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191201_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.77 +22:03:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191202_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191202_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.93 +20:10:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191207_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191207_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191216_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191216_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.74 +22:40:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191218_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191218_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:37.86 +18:33:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191219_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191219_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.16 +18:59:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191245_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191245_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:10.80 +25:25:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191256_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191256_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:36.72 +22:27:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191273_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 191273_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191293_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191293_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.24 +22:45:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191295_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191295_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:48.67 +25:09:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191308_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191308_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191318_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191318_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.63 +21:46:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191337_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191337_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.89 +26:10:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:02.44 +24:22:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191377_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191377_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.67 +20:02:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191379_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191379_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.43 +24:25:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191381_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191381_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.00 +23:00:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191382_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191382_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191389_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191389_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.18 +20:53:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191397_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191397_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.31 +25:47:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191404_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191404_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191412_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191412_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191448_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191448_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191457_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191457_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.34 +25:09:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191485_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191485_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:37.64 +22:22:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191545_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191545_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191546_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191546_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:15.04 +19:35:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191571_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191571_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.87 +23:11:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191573_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191573_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191578_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191578_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.55 +19:32:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:05.48 +22:29:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191613_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191613_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.26 +23:07:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191626_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191626_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191633_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 191633_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191634_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191634_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:39.87 +22:58:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191640_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191640_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.57 +25:22:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191659_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191659_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:43.28 +26:18:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191669_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191669_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:11.54 +25:40:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191675_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191675_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:33.73 +21:19:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191683_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191683_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:07.03 +24:22:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191684_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191684_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.37 +20:09:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191713_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191713_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:34.71 +17:59:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191736_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191736_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126659_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 126659_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:35.27 +18:20:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:48.49 +19:44:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66907_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 66907_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:18.27 +22:39:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74393_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 74393_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:00.42 +22:16:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 61658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:20.90 +23:05:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40163_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 40163_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:52.05 +24:29:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34058_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 34058_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 63572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:13.97 +22:46:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38929_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 38929_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:43.04 +24:38:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.44 +26:13:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91628_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 91628_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 56378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:34.76 +23:22:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:50.54 +21:45:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:12.53 +19:30:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147723_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 147723_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:00.68 +19:35:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36662_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 36662_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:14.13 +24:28:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:01.33 +20:16:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114749_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 114749_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:43.69 +20:01:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:18.14 +24:59:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 76761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:57.88 +22:13:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.81 +23:10:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 34402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.98 +24:53:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181352_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 181352_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122228_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 122228_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127266_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 127266_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:18.63 +18:20:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68483_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 68483_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:59.77 +22:30:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137133_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137133_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:08.07 +18:53:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93856_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 93856_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25505_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 25505_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.57 +25:24:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74785_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 74785_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:29.19 +22:03:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86534_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 86534_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82158_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 82158_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:57.51 +21:51:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.18 +24:10:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158119_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 158119_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:04.16 +17:07:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.36 +25:40:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 37049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:50.52 +24:45:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:37.35 +20:19:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 80011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:23.31 +21:44:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68249_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 68249_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:25.26 +22:44:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59567_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 59567_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:36.25 +23:13:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81365_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 81365_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:40.94 +21:49:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167486_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 167486_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:33.73 +17:49:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.76 +19:21:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86369_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 86369_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:16.62 +21:31:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32270_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 32270_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:11.24 +24:55:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:56.58 +21:25:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114972_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 114972_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:28.95 +20:02:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:20.12 +17:59:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81205_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 81205_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:16.89 +21:56:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165040_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 165040_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:17.33 +17:31:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:30.69 +22:47:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 49132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:19.53 +23:56:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 166618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:25.41 +17:43:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:36.15 +25:59:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101041_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 101041_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71919_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 71919_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:15.23 +22:31:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.18 +20:22:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138780_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138780_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:10.64 +19:08:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 32970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:04.34 +25:01:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59010_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 59010_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.33 +23:16:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62999_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 62999_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:49.44 +23:06:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.46 +17:54:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09594_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 09594_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:40.01 +26:28:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59144_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 59144_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33497_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 33497_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:08.11 +24:51:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.45 +20:22:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.13 +17:45:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 124601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 65120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:25.79 +22:48:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:25.47 +19:25:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116941_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 116941_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:25.14 +19:49:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95211_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 95211_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64768_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 64768_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.17 +17:53:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141266_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 141266_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:03.65 +19:11:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42475_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 42475_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70425_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 70425_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:36.11 +22:25:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106921_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 106921_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:43.15 +20:37:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 153854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:40.79 +16:57:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.10 +21:51:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.82 +25:25:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137813_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 137813_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56966_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 56966_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 62770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.37 +23:51:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57016_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 57016_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:58.88 +23:30:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65952_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 65952_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.88 +21:13:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:15.47 +20:28:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60104_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 60104_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:03.46 +23:09:47.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.269 3403591814907805696 085.76438661468 +23.16312485268 13.0144 10.9547 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.269#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154293_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 154293_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18807_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 18807_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.61 +25:49:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.98 +20:10:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53615_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 53615_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:46.53 +23:40:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 34493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.70 +25:00:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84793_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 84793_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:38.26 +21:56:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108697_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 108697_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.78 +20:28:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96330_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 96330_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:38.63 +21:08:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66296_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 66296_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:07.26 +22:50:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 105095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:39.27 +20:41:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117978_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 117978_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:12.77 +18:35:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129379_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 129379_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:31.61 +18:32:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 101378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:22.21 +20:52:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133429_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 133429_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.47 +18:42:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120138_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 120138_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:10.21 +17:57:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163269_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 163269_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:22.56 +17:31:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39648_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 39648_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:00.77 +24:33:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116845_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 116845_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:23.25 +19:52:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157917_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 157917_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:01.73 +17:14:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160317_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 160317_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:26.10 +17:23:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 155021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:14.31 +17:03:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 155271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:03.66 +17:02:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.39 +20:16:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150783_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 150783_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:56.57 +19:44:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14039_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 14039_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:59.59 +25:57:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:07.05 +23:15:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.14 +20:08:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 166587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:26.01 +17:43:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_00-14-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
