This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2011 2461326.7011 11.61 23:39:14.72 -08:47:08.8
76.62514 -64.94690 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.106 Dione -0 0 0 11.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:39:14.72 -08:47:08.8: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:39:14.72 -08:47:08.8: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7011,11.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2011 11.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2011 2461326.7011 12.25 23:21:48.68 -14:20:36.3
59.90383 -65.52055 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.118 Peitho -1 -0 1 12.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:21:48.68 -14:20:36.3: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:21:48.68 -14:20:36.3: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7011,12.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2011 12.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2011 2461326.7011 12.39 23:27:53.54 -05:18:38.1
76.84943 -60.47496 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.317 Roxane -0 0 0 12.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:27:53.54 -05:18:38.1: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:27:53.54 -05:18:38.1: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7011,12.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2011 12.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2011 2461326.7011 12.48 23:05:28.75 -12:26:51.3
58.31795 -61.17709 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.113 Amalthea -0 -0 0 12.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:05:28.75 -12:26:51.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:05:28.75 -12:26:51.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7011,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2011 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2011 2461326.7011 13.68 22:50:35.83 -13:43:48.4
52.27190 -58.79997 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.442 Eichsfeldia -0 -0 0 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:50:35.83 -13:43:48.4: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:50:35.83 -13:43:48.4: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7011,13.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2011 13.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2011 2461326.7011 13.87 23:18:10.81 -06:50:18.9
71.18310 -59.97395 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.799 Gudula 0 0 0 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:18:10.81 -06:50:18.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:18:10.81 -06:50:18.9: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7011,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2011 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2011 2461326.7011 14.57 23:15:07.24 -07:22:16.3
69.36523 -59.80618 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.981 Martina 0 -1 1 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:15:07.24 -07:22:16.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:15:07.24 -07:22:16.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7011,14.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2011 14.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
First image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Last image: 2461326.70140441 13.10.2026 04:49:51.341 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6230
Objects passed selection criteria: 6227
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5999.25
Average stars matched: 5771.75 (96.2079 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232800 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 00:23:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
First image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Last image: 2461326.70140441 13.10.2026 04:49:51.341 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 136
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 54 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33879
Objects passed selection criteria: 33805
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 32722.5
Average stars matched: 31719 (96.9333 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 255456 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 00:25:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461326.70087902
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:46.602 -09:56:57.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86
Second-epoch image center 23:08:46.602 -09:56:57.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0947 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:45.328 -09:56:57.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86
Second-epoch image center 23:08:45.328 -09:56:57.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0902 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:46.602 -09:56:57.78
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:45.328 -09:56:57.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00523 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s4ETTrLaIc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8wRZsLUgT0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7yD4ivwrOv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.erQVoCjpZi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5808 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Loaded 5067 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3713 out of 3841 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3841 out of 5808 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.688000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.688000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5808 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Loaded 5067 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3713 out of 3841 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3841 out of 5808 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (aperture=5.8)
Read 5775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6970 to 355.2476 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.2790 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6970 to 355.2476 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.2790 deg
Loaded 5057 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3732 out of 3864 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3864 out of 5775 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
2.1 pix Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
15.3 mag. Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.s4ETTrLaIc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=422, bad_region=0, passed=5808
Got 5808 stars (including 5379 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4819 stars left (next iteration limit 5300)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits N_match=4819 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1129 n_q2=1215 n_q3=1239 n_q4=1236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8wRZsLUgT0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=432, bad_region=0, passed=5775
Got 5775 stars (including 5335 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5775 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4812 stars left (next iteration limit 5294)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits N_match=4812 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1134 n_q2=1213 n_q3=1229 n_q4=1236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7yD4ivwrOv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=419, bad_region=0, passed=6307
Got 6307 stars (including 5883 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6307 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6307 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6307 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6307 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4818 stars left (next iteration limit 5299)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4818 robust_rms=13.579 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.026 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.026 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4818 robust_rms=0.450 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.740 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.740 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4818 robust_rms=0.241 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.324 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.324 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4818 robust_rms_before=0.967 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.258 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.241 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.368 worst_region_rms_after=0.324 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.103 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.324
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:46.645 -09:56:58.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6307 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3945096.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.967 -> 0.241 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4818 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4640 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4640 pairs (4818 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4640 robust_rms=13.546 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.000 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.000 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4640 robust_rms=0.450 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.731 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.731 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4640 robust_rms=0.241 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.323 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.323 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4640 robust_rms_before=0.241 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.241 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.241 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.325 worst_region_rms_after=0.323 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.325 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.323
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:46.645 -09:56:58.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6307 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3950141.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.241 -> 0.241 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4640 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6307 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4640 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6307 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits N_match=4640 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.229 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1124 n_q2=1194 n_q3=1171 n_q4=1151 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.erQVoCjpZi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=423, bad_region=0, passed=6325
Got 6325 stars (including 5897 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6325 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4821 stars left (next iteration limit 5303)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4821 robust_rms=13.358 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.288 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.288 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4821 robust_rms=0.429 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.697 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.697 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4821 robust_rms=0.251 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.318 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.318 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4821 robust_rms_before=0.953 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.269 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.251 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.365 worst_region_rms_after=0.318 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.063 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.318
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:45.369 -09:56:58.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6325 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3945187.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.953 -> 0.251 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4821 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4639 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4639 pairs (4821 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4639 robust_rms=13.354 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.148 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.148 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4639 robust_rms=0.429 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.694 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.694 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4639 robust_rms=0.251 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.320 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.320 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4639 robust_rms_before=0.251 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.251 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.251 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.319 worst_region_rms_after=0.320 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.319 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.320
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.320 vs 0.319 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4639 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4639 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits N_match=4639 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=1124 n_q2=1193 n_q3=1174 n_q4=1148 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits sigma_overall=0.326 worst_q_ratio=1.175
ref2=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.160
new1=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits sigma_overall=0.255 worst_q_ratio=1.073
new2=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits sigma_overall=0.266 worst_q_ratio=1.079
reference average sigma_overall=0.3305 worst_q_ratio=1.1675
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865_astrometric_residuals.png (4819 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866_astrometric_residuals.png (4812 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188_astrometric_residuals.png (4640 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.19 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189_astrometric_residuals.png (4639 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.21 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:05:50.87 -08:54:58.3: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:06:43.67 -14:58:34.0: 11.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:39:14.72 -08:47:08.8: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:05:11.53 -09:30:17.5: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:05:50.87 -08:54:58.3: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:06:43.67 -14:58:34.0: 11.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:05:11.53 -09:30:17.5: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:05:50.87 -08:54:58.3: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7998 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.09 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:06:43.67 -14:58:34.0: ref_mag=11.09 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2559 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:05:11.53 -09:30:17.5: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0306 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:39:14.72 -08:47:08.8: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20286.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20264_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 20264_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:18:58.19 -07:18:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20277_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 20277_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20286_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 20286_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20291_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 20291_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20297_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 20297_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aqr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:39:14.72 -08:47:08.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:46.645 -09:56:58.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86
Second-epoch image center 23:08:46.645 -09:56:58.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0948 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:45.369 -09:56:58.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86
Second-epoch image center 23:08:45.369 -09:56:58.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0903 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:46.645 -09:56:58.16
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:45.369 -09:56:58.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00524 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6kkmUR8YMH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jApPD2KuR9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JHkbkZB0uP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bryvKUb9th
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34068 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2119 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2119 deg
Loaded 5099 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4056 out of 34068 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.580800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.580800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34068 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2119 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2119 deg
Loaded 5099 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4056 out of 34068 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 33982 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6760 to 355.2847 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.2199 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6760 to 355.2847 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.2199 deg
Loaded 5102 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3745 out of 4059 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4059 out of 33982 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 120 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
1.9 pix Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
15.4 mag. Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6kkmUR8YMH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1262, bad_region=23, passed=34058
Got 34058 stars (including 32704 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34058 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4820 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits N_match=4820 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1169 n_q2=1235 n_q3=1220 n_q4=1196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jApPD2KuR9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1275, bad_region=24, passed=33972
Got 33972 stars (including 32618 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33972 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4817 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits N_match=4817 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1164 n_q2=1233 n_q3=1221 n_q4=1199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JHkbkZB0uP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1139, bad_region=22, passed=31829
Got 31829 stars (including 30626 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31829 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4820 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4820 robust_rms=13.604 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.089 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.089 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4820 robust_rms=0.454 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.735 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.735 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4820 robust_rms=0.240 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.328 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.328 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4820 robust_rms_before=0.241 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.253 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.240 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.327 worst_region_rms_after=0.328 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.327 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.328
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.327 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.327 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.241 arcsec matched=4820
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits N_match=4820 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.234 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=1173 n_q2=1249 n_q3=1214 n_q4=1184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bryvKUb9th (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1166, bad_region=27, passed=32147
Got 32147 stars (including 30912 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32147 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4827 stars left (next iteration limit 5309)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4827 robust_rms=13.485 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.005 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.005 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4827 robust_rms=0.435 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.713 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.713 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4827 robust_rms=0.249 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.323 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.323 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4827 robust_rms_before=0.251 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.263 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.249 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.324 worst_region_rms_after=0.323 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.324 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.323
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.324 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.324 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.251 arcsec matched=4827
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits N_match=4827 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1180 n_q2=1239 n_q3=1221 n_q4=1187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_235307_TTUQ1b1x1_1918122_7igajIM7/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:30:03.66 -11:30:40.1: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:49:58.70 -06:58:02.9: 14.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:49:58.70 -06:58:02.9: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:21:48.68 -14:20:36.3: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:49:58.70 -06:58:02.9: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7149 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:30:03.66 -11:30:40.1: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:03.66 -11:30:40.1: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5226 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:27:53.54 -05:18:38.1: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:05:28.75 -12:26:51.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:21:48.68 -14:20:36.3: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:27:53.54 -05:18:38.1: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:05:28.75 -12:26:51.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:50:35.83 -13:43:48.4: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:50:35.83 -13:43:48.4: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:18:10.81 -06:50:18.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:18:10.81 -06:50:18.9: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:33:31.89 -13:47:42.2: 14.70 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:33:31.89 -13:47:42.2: 14.76 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:31.89 -13:47:42.2: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3168 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:28:45.80 -13:47:35.9: 14.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:28:45.80 -13:47:35.9: 14.26 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:45.80 -13:47:35.9: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1997 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:46:58.44 -13:25:53.8: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:46:58.44 -13:25:53.8: 14.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:46:58.44 -13:25:53.8: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3425 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:36:24.74 -12:57:11.7: 15.00 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:36:42.49 -12:45:34.1: 14.87 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:36:42.49 -12:45:34.1: 14.65 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:42.49 -12:45:34.1: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4659 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:36:24.74 -12:57:11.7: 14.91 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:24.74 -12:57:11.7: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5080 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:46:40.98 -12:49:49.4: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:43:51.03 -12:35:12.1: 15.34 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:46:40.98 -12:49:49.4: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:46:40.98 -12:49:49.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5877 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:48:28.15 -11:17:29.4: 15.06 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:36:36.68 -05:46:13.5: 14.75 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:43:51.03 -12:35:12.1: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:43:51.03 -12:35:12.1: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5701 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:48:28.15 -11:17:29.4: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:36:36.68 -05:46:13.5: 14.90 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:48:28.15 -11:17:29.4: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5744 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:36.68 -05:46:13.5: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5159 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:36:01.40 -10:28:26.2: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:36:01.40 -10:28:26.2: 14.93 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:01.40 -10:28:26.2: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5287 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:39:32.81 -11:15:33.8: 14.81 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:43:07.72 -10:35:03.3: 15.28 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:39:32.81 -11:15:33.8: 14.98 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:14:43.68 -14:37:41.2: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:32.81 -11:15:33.8: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6235 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:43:07.72 -10:35:03.3: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:43:07.72 -10:35:03.3: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6600 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:15:07.24 -07:22:16.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:14:43.68 -14:37:41.2: 15.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:14:43.68 -14:37:41.2: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7084 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:15:07.24 -07:22:16.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:25:23.57 -06:20:40.6: 15.06 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:29:52.56 -05:42:20.0: 15.13 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:13:42.98 -15:05:09.7: 15.08 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:25:23.57 -06:20:40.6: 14.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:23.57 -06:20:40.6: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6767 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:25:31.50 -12:46:33.1: 14.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:29:52.56 -05:42:20.0: 15.23 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:52.56 -05:42:20.0: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8137 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:25:31.50 -12:46:33.1: 14.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:13:42.98 -15:05:09.7: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:31.50 -12:46:33.1: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7663 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:13:42.98 -15:05:09.7: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6967 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52439.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52452.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52455.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52582.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52609.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52814.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52372_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52372_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52373_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52373_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52392_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52392_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52394_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52394_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52400_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52400_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52415_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52415_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:39:14.72 -08:47:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52418_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52418_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52425_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52425_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52428_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52428_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52437_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52437_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52439_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 52439_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52440_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52440_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52443_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52443_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52446_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52446_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52452_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 52452_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52455_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 52455_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52457_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52457_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52468_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52468_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52475_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52475_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52476_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52476_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52483_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52483_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52484_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52484_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52485_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52485_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52491_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52491_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52495_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52495_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52504_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52504_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52512_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52512_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52515_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52515_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52524_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52524_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52526_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52526_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52531_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52531_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52544_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52544_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52548_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52548_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52554_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52554_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52556_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52556_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52558_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52558_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52559_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52559_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52563_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52563_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52564_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52564_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52569_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52569_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52573_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52573_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52578_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52578_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52580_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52580_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52581_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52581_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52582_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 52582_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52586_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52586_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52587_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52587_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52591_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52591_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52593_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52593_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52594_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52594_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52595_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52595_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52598_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52598_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52599_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52599_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52602_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52602_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52604_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52604_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52605_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52605_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52609_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 52609_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52610_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52610_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52617_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52617_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52618_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52618_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52619_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52619_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52628_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52628_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52630_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52630_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52637_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52637_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52640_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52640_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52647_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52647_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52648_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52648_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52662_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52662_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52663_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52663_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52673_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52673_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52674_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52674_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52675_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52675_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52677_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52677_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52679_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52679_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52680_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52680_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52681_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52681_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52686_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52686_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52688_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52688_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52699_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52699_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52702_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52702_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52706_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52706_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52712_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52712_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52715_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52715_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52716_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52716_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52728_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52728_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52731_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52731_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52736_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52736_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52739_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52739_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52747_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52747_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52750_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52750_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52751_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52751_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52753_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52753_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52758_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52758_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52760_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52760_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52761_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52761_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52763_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52763_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52766_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52766_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52771_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52771_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52777_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52777_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52780_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52780_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52790_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52790_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52794_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52794_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52800_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52800_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52803_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52803_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52804_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52804_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52808_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52808_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52812_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52812_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52813_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52813_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52814_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 52814_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52819_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52819_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52828_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52828_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52831_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52831_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52836_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52836_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52838_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52838_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52842_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52842_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52844_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52844_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52853_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52853_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52863_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52863_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52865_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52865_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08554_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 08554_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_23-49-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
