This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3938 2461325.8938 12.40 05:32:20.15 -18:21:59.3
221.46577 -25.43291 galactic Lep Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.183 Istria 0 0 0 12.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:32:20.15 -18:21:59.3: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:32:20.15 -18:21:59.3: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8938,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3938 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8938,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3938 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.69662478 18.01.2026 04:42:58.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
First image: 2461058.69662478 18.01.2026 04:42:58.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Last image: 2461325.89409697 12.10.2026 09:27:19.978 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9981
Objects passed selection criteria: 9972
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9406.5
Average stars matched: 9178.25 (97.5735 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235464 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 04:33:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.69662478 18.01.2026 04:42:58.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
First image: 2461058.69662478 18.01.2026 04:42:58.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Last image: 2461325.89409697 12.10.2026 09:27:19.978 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 57
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 62175
Objects passed selection criteria: 62018
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 57195.2
Average stars matched: 55225.5 (96.5561 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 281800 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 04:34:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461325.89344490
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:15.372 -18:00:17.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54
Second-epoch image center 05:20:15.372 -18:00:17.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0701 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:12.761 -18:00:50.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54
Second-epoch image center 05:20:12.761 -18:00:50.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0596 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:20:15.372 -18:00:17.61
Second-epoch second image center 05:20:12.761 -18:00:50.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01378 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2iirrg78hF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FSY1VKajFd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6mgkiEMkUT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pPHMy8W7OW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9993 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6437 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3430 to -12.4414 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6437 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3430 to -12.4414 deg
Loaded 9864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7030 out of 7375 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7375 out of 9993 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.816350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.816350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9993 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6437 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3430 to -12.4414 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6437 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3430 to -12.4414 deg
Loaded 9864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7030 out of 7375 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7375 out of 9993 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 9607 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6438 to 88.6318 deg, Dec -23.3334 to -12.4408 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6438 to 88.6318 deg, Dec -23.3334 to -12.4408 deg
Loaded 9860 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6881 out of 7251 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7251 out of 9607 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
2.0 pix Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
2.7 pix fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
2.7 pix fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
15.1 mag. Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.2iirrg78hF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> 'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=819, bad_region=0, passed=9993
Got 9993 stars (including 9160 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9993 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1366 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1398 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.317
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -region wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FSY1VKajFd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=851, bad_region=0, passed=9607
Got 9607 stars (including 8741 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9607 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1366 n_q2=1086 n_q3=1417 n_q4=1054 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.356
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -region wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.6mgkiEMkUT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=561, bad_region=0, passed=9112
Got 9112 stars (including 8546 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9112 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4919 stars left (next iteration limit 5410)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=13.092 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.771 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.771 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.439 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.761 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.761 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.267 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.360 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.360 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4919 robust_rms_before=0.760 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.263 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.267 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.363 worst_region_rms_after=0.360 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.790 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.360
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.363 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.363 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.263 arcsec matched=4919
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits N_match=4919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.242 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.272 n_q1=1088 n_q2=1339 n_q3=1121 n_q4=1371 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits -region wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pPHMy8W7OW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=569, bad_region=0, passed=9149
Got 9149 stars (including 8573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9149 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9149 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9149 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9149 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4915 stars left (next iteration limit 5407)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4915 robust_rms=13.013 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.071 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.071 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4915 robust_rms=0.435 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.765 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.765 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4915 robust_rms=0.267 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.350 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.350 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4915 robust_rms_before=0.755 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.265 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.267 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.356 worst_region_rms_after=0.350 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.786 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.350
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.356 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.265 arcsec matched=4915
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits N_match=4915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1093 n_q2=1344 n_q3=1116 n_q4=1362 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits -region wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.317
ref2=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.356
new1=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits sigma_overall=0.272 worst_q_ratio=1.138
new2=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits sigma_overall=0.269 worst_q_ratio=1.138
reference average sigma_overall=0.3375 worst_q_ratio=1.3365
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169_astrometric_residuals.png (4922 matched stars from wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097_astrometric_residuals.png (4923 matched stars from wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494_astrometric_residuals.png (4919 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495_astrometric_residuals.png (4915 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lep-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:22:04.68 -18:02:29.0: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:23:03.79 -18:46:07.0: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:25:18.13 -19:17:40.5: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:17:00.00 -19:34:37.5: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:16:27.42 -23:02:49.1: 10.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:31:01.23 -17:17:23.7: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:31:01.23 -17:17:23.7: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:17:00.00 -19:34:37.5: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:25:18.13 -19:17:40.5: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:23:03.79 -18:46:07.0: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:22:04.68 -18:02:29.0: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:16:27.42 -23:02:49.1: 10.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:00.00 -19:34:37.5: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9720 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:01.23 -17:17:23.7: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9146 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:03.79 -18:46:07.0: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9410 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:18.13 -19:17:40.5: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9273 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.68 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:22:04.68 -18:02:29.0: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9574 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:27.42 -23:02:49.1: ref_mag=10.68 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7567 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20441_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20441_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:04.27 -16:22:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20452_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20452_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:44.63 -15:55:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20505_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20505_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20582_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20582_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:05.33 -16:43:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20594_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20594_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:22.46 -17:51:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20667_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20667_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20673_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20673_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20681_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20681_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20688_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20688_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20689_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20689_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01807_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 01807_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:36.48 -14:48:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lep-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:15.372 -18:00:17.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54
Second-epoch image center 05:20:15.372 -18:00:17.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0701 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:12.761 -18:00:50.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54
Second-epoch image center 05:20:12.761 -18:00:50.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0596 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:20:15.372 -18:00:17.61
Second-epoch second image center 05:20:12.761 -18:00:50.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01378 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QHRrNW7iE0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qaOaRTk392
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s6bOF4V5R0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OhgDZfcFxJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 64337 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6229 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3479 to -12.4200 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6229 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3479 to -12.4200 deg
Loaded 9904 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7112 out of 8122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8122 out of 64337 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.682750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.682750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 64337 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6229 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3479 to -12.4200 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6229 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3479 to -12.4200 deg
Loaded 9904 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7112 out of 8122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8122 out of 64337 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 64139 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6237 to 88.6352 deg, Dec -23.3362 to -12.4074 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6237 to 88.6352 deg, Dec -23.3362 to -12.4074 deg
Loaded 9907 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7100 out of 8133 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8133 out of 64139 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 53 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
1.9 pix Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
2.5 pix fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
2.5 pix fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
15.3 mag. Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.QHRrNW7iE0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> 'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=3724, bad_region=1, passed=64313
Got 64313 stars (including 60489 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64313 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4926 stars left (next iteration limit 5418)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits N_match=4926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1323 n_q2=1109 n_q3=1414 n_q4=1080 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -region wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qaOaRTk392 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=3682, bad_region=1, passed=64117
Got 64117 stars (including 60325 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64117 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4926 stars left (next iteration limit 5418)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits N_match=4926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1106 n_q3=1431 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.328
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -region wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.s6bOF4V5R0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2351, bad_region=31, passed=50854
Got 50854 stars (including 48407 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50854 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=13.320 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.238 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.238 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.446 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.739 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.739 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.268 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.356 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.356 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4918 robust_rms_before=0.752 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.261 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.268 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.368 worst_region_rms_after=0.356 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.787 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.356
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.368 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.368 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.261 arcsec matched=4918
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.236 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1073 n_q2=1331 n_q3=1151 n_q4=1363 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits -region wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OhgDZfcFxJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2276, bad_region=31, passed=50982
Got 50982 stars (including 48600 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50982 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4917 stars left (next iteration limit 5408)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=13.255 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.355 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.355 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=0.436 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.749 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.749 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=0.263 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.345 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.345 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4917 robust_rms_before=0.743 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.264 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.263 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.366 worst_region_rms_after=0.345 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.779 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.345
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.366 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.366 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.264 arcsec matched=4917
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits N_match=4917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.234 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1079 n_q2=1333 n_q3=1155 n_q4=1350 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits -region wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-26-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_042955_TTUQ1b1x1_3809971_6HqKfhvL/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lep-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:49:38.64 -15:26:00.6: 13.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:41:17.60 -20:29:53.2: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:15:53.17 -13:55:02.0: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:49:42.47 -18:49:28.0: 13.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:58:46.94 -19:59:09.9: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:58:58.03 -12:49:51.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:09:12.62 -17:51:29.0: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:15:56.97 -15:36:44.0: 14.18 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:53:01.71 -16:26:25.5: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:27:35.55 -15:16:16.2: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:49:38.64 -15:26:00.6: 13.79 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:58:46.94 -19:59:09.9: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:58:58.03 -12:49:51.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:58:58.03 -12:49:51.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:49:42.47 -18:49:28.0: 13.59 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:09:12.62 -17:51:29.0: 14.38 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:15:53.17 -13:55:02.0: 14.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:41:17.60 -20:29:53.2: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:15:56.97 -15:36:44.0: 14.36 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:53:01.71 -16:26:25.5: 13.80 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:58:46.94 -19:59:09.9: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5936 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:42.47 -18:49:28.0: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7073 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:38.64 -15:26:00.6: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7840 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:12.62 -17:51:29.0: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5103 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:17.60 -20:29:53.2: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7024 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:53.17 -13:55:02.0: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9995 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:56.97 -15:36:44.0: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3314 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:01.71 -16:26:25.5: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9833 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:27:35.55 -15:16:16.2: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:35.55 -15:16:16.2: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2535 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:16:27.42 -23:02:49.2: 10.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:00:29.80 -18:58:09.7: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:32:20.15 -18:21:59.3: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:04:00.03 -21:02:50.2: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:16:18.59 -15:20:19.9: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:30:47.08 -19:24:08.4: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:40:35.07 -20:17:25.0: 13.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:23:14.24 -14:50:56.0: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:32:20.15 -18:21:59.3: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:00:29.80 -18:58:09.7: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:16:27.42 -23:02:49.2: 10.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.86 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:00:29.80 -18:58:09.7: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2788 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:27.42 -23:02:49.2: ref_mag=10.86 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7920 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:01:16.90 -20:04:47.9: 13.59 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:04:00.03 -21:02:50.2: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:00.03 -21:02:50.2: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1610 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:30:47.08 -19:24:08.4: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:40:35.07 -20:17:25.0: 13.29 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:16:18.59 -15:20:19.9: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:47.08 -19:24:08.4: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5035 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:35.07 -20:17:25.0: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5167 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:18.59 -15:20:19.9: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6040 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:23:14.24 -14:50:56.0: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:14.24 -14:50:56.0: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5601 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:08:32.55 -18:11:42.3: 14.06 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:01:16.90 -20:04:47.9: 13.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:16.90 -20:04:47.9: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6777 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:26:56.84 -16:18:48.8: 14.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:08:32.55 -18:11:42.3: 13.91 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:32.55 -18:11:42.3: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9173 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:31:36.01 -15:12:40.6: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:15:28.59 -15:13:30.2: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:47:01.64 -13:10:25.4: 14.26 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:26:56.84 -16:18:48.8: 13.91 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:26:56.84 -16:18:48.8: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9239 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:04:01.23 -13:25:23.7: 14.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:02:19.16 -15:59:42.9: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:31:36.01 -15:12:40.6: 14.03 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:25:55.96 -15:14:38.1: 14.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:36.01 -15:12:40.6: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9937 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:15:28.59 -15:13:30.2: 14.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:28.59 -15:13:30.2: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0827 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:47:01.64 -13:10:25.4: 14.39 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:01.64 -13:10:25.4: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1812 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:49:45.34 -14:25:36.4: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:04:01.23 -13:25:23.7: 15.04 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:25:55.96 -15:14:38.1: 14.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:02:19.16 -15:59:42.9: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:01.23 -13:25:23.7: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3819 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:55.96 -15:14:38.1: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3286 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:19.16 -15:59:42.9: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3555 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:01:25.05 -14:14:40.7: 14.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:49:45.34 -14:25:36.4: 14.58 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:45.34 -14:25:36.4: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3807 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:55:48.33 -14:01:02.4: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:04:47.32 -17:53:17.1: 15.09 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:02:10.31 -13:50:02.6: 15.45 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:01:25.05 -14:14:40.7: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:25.05 -14:14:40.7: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4932 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:00:48.75 -14:54:14.9: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:35:25.98 -15:42:29.3: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:55:48.33 -14:01:02.4: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:58:32.05 -15:30:46.9: 14.94 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:04:47.32 -17:53:17.1: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:48.33 -14:01:02.4: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4414 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:47.32 -17:53:17.1: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5516 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:02:10.31 -13:50:02.6: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:10.31 -13:50:02.6: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5462 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:51:12.63 -13:25:50.1: 14.51 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:00:48.75 -14:54:14.9: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:00:48.75 -14:54:14.9: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5974 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:35:25.98 -15:42:29.3: 14.42 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:25.98 -15:42:29.3: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5260 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:58:32.05 -15:30:46.9: 14.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:58:32.05 -15:30:46.9: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5702 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:51:12.63 -13:25:50.1: 14.47 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:12.63 -13:25:50.1: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4558 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79820.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79332_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79332_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79336_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79336_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79348_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79348_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79352_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79352_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79354_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79354_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79355_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79355_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79356_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79356_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79357_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79357_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:51.55 -19:19:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79358_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79358_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79359_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79359_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79360_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79360_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79364_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79364_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:18.35 -18:30:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79425_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79425_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:04.30 -16:22:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79497_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79497_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79570_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79570_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:05.31 -16:43:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79582_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79582_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:22.47 -17:51:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79798_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79798_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:27.34 -17:45:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79820_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
Preparing report for the candidate 79820_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80180_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80180_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:07.33 -15:47:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80249_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80249_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80257_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80257_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80365_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80365_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:33.74 -17:50:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80403_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80403_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:58.11 -14:22:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80466_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80466_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80476_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80476_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80495_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80495_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80541_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80541_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80581_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80581_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80786_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80786_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:51.19 -16:51:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80797_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80797_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80845_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80845_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:03.34 -15:07:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80853_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80853_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80856_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80856_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80865_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80865_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80906_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
Preparing report for the candidate 80906_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80973_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80973_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:49.92 -15:48:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80987_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80987_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:34.21 -12:58:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81018_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81018_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81099_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81099_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81101_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81101_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81103_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81103_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81110_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81110_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81145_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81145_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81169_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81169_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81204_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81204_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81224_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81224_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81228_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81228_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81247_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81247_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81276_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81276_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81288_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81288_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34473_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 34473_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:13.03 -18:11:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19424_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 19424_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:44.63 -15:55:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11444_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 11444_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_04-27-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks