This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3546 2461325.8546 12.98 04:08:22.25 +17:45:01.2
175.36110 -24.48557 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato -1 1 1 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:22.25 +17:45:01.2: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:22.25 +17:45:01.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3546* 04 08 22.25 +17 45 01.2 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8546,12.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3546 12.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3546 2461325.8546 14.12 04:28:06.75 +17:33:22.0
178.85181 -21.05048 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1171 Rusthawelia 0 0 0 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:06.75 +17:33:22.0: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:06.75 +17:33:22.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3546* 04 28 06.75 +17 33 22.0 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8546,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3546 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3546 2461325.8546 14.47 04:13:33.55 +13:03:28.5
180.19605 -26.62100 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1115 Sabauda -0 -0 1 14.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:13:33.55 +13:03:28.5: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:13:33.55 +13:03:28.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3546* 04 13 33.55 +13 03 28.5 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8546,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3546 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3546 2461325.8546 15.32 04:31:34.46 +11:44:50.2
184.35399 -23.98662 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.874 Rotraut 1 -1 1 15.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:31:34.46 +11:44:50.2: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:31:34.46 +11:44:50.2: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3546* 04 31 34.46 +11 44 50.2 15.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8546,15.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3546 15.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461325.85483037 12.10.2026 08:30:47.344 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8246
Objects passed selection criteria: 8224
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6366
Average stars matched: 5887.25 (92.4796 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233828 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 03:47:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461325.85483037 12.10.2026 08:30:47.344 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 57
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.96
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 56301
Objects passed selection criteria: 56130
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 44213
Average stars matched: 40612.5 (91.8565 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 271744 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 03:48:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461325.85434087
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.898 +14:00:28.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:39.898 +14:00:28.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0082 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:42.376 +14:00:55.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:42.376 +14:00:55.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0188 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:39.898 +14:00:28.35
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:42.376 +14:00:55.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01253 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UyWIuYLnuL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hx2JtMj5oR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dpugAeKxKo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UirtyBL9Lb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.989100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.989100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec +8.6216 to +19.2870 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec 8.6216 to 19.2870 deg
Loaded 4407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3650 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3650 out of 8488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.UyWIuYLnuL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=728, bad_region=1955, passed=9344
Got 9344 stars (including 6757 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=1649 n_q2=740 n_q3=1787 n_q4=698 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Hx2JtMj5oR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=679, bad_region=1868, passed=8488
Got 8488 stars (including 6040 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=1626 n_q2=774 n_q3=1759 n_q4=714 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.402
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dpugAeKxKo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=549, bad_region=2558, passed=8405
Got 8405 stars (including 5453 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8405 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=8.115 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.366 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.366 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.480 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.819 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.819 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.463 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.463 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4885 robust_rms_before=1.182 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.360 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.508 worst_region_rms_after=0.463 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.007 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.463
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.508 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.508 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.360 arcsec matched=4885
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=1438 n_q2=992 n_q3=1502 n_q4=953 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.UirtyBL9Lb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=549, bad_region=2541, passed=8326
Got 8326 stars (including 5389 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8326 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=8.133 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.263 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.263 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.519 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.828 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.828 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.391 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.471 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.471 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4889 robust_rms_before=1.232 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.404 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.391 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.490 worst_region_rms_after=0.471 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.029 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.471
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.490 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.490 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.404 arcsec matched=4889
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.472 n_q1=1451 n_q2=1003 n_q3=1498 n_q4=937 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.242
ref2=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.402
new1=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.073
new2=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.086
reference average sigma_overall=0.3245 worst_q_ratio=1.322
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474_astrometric_residuals.png (4885 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475_astrometric_residuals.png (4889 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:33:50.14 +13:06:46.2: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:57.78 +15:19:04.9: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:36:31.62 +16:29:05.6: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:33:50.14 +13:06:46.2: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:57.78 +15:19:04.9: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:36:31.62 +16:29:05.6: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:50.14 +13:06:46.2: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4511 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:31.62 +16:29:05.6: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3982 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:57.78 +15:19:04.9: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3767 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20119_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 20119_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:51.58 +10:00:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21390_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 21390_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21418_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 21418_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21455_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 21455_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.70 +09:56:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:27.22 +16:33:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.898 +14:00:28.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:39.898 +14:00:28.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0082 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:42.376 +14:00:55.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:42.376 +14:00:55.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0188 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:39.898 +14:00:28.35
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:42.376 +14:00:55.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01253 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OF9VpQayrZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aYgGvjlJ5n
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DlR3rEcLI1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bCIT5nPue3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.838400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.838400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.88
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.88
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 58309 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec +8.6064 to +19.2869 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec 8.6064 to 19.2869 deg
Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3131 out of 3673 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3673 out of 58309 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=4.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 40 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
1.8 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.8 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OF9VpQayrZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=3506, bad_region=10392, passed=62254
Got 62254 stars (including 48728 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1625 n_q2=733 n_q3=1802 n_q4=721 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aYgGvjlJ5n (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=3080, bad_region=9253, passed=58303
Got 58303 stars (including 46293 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58303 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.251 n_q1=1612 n_q2=760 n_q3=1786 n_q4=722 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.387
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DlR3rEcLI1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2591, bad_region=12196, passed=50468
Got 50468 stars (including 36517 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50468 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=7.999 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.247 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.247 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.481 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.861 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.861 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.348 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.473 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.473 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4884 robust_rms_before=1.161 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.352 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.348 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.493 worst_region_rms_after=0.473 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.991 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.473
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.493 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.493 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.352 arcsec matched=4884
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=1475 n_q2=988 n_q3=1469 n_q4=952 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.067
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bCIT5nPue3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2673, bad_region=12369, passed=51206
Got 51206 stars (including 37055 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51206 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=8.059 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.464 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.464 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.522 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.796 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.796 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.385 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.476 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.476 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4885 robust_rms_before=1.204 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.400 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.385 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.500 worst_region_rms_after=0.476 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.007 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.476
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.500 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.500 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.400 arcsec matched=4885
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.460 n_q1=1486 n_q2=989 n_q3=1464 n_q4=946 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:40.84 +16:14:55.9: 14.85 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:22:20.75 +10:55:25.6: 15.07 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:48.89 +10:54:48.5: 15.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:21:44.42 +14:54:09.0: 15.43 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:10:44.31 +12:05:45.2: 15.02 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:17:30.93 +10:25:56.5: 13.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:22.25 +17:45:01.2: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:42:39.31 +17:52:58.6: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:10:44.31 +12:05:45.2: 15.08 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:21:44.42 +14:54:09.0: 15.13 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:22.25 +17:45:01.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:42:39.31 +17:52:58.6: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:22:20.75 +10:55:25.6: 15.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:40.84 +16:14:55.9: 14.94 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:48.89 +10:54:48.5: 15.02 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:17:30.93 +10:25:56.5: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:44.42 +14:54:09.0: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1695 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:44.31 +12:05:45.2: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9003 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:39.31 +17:52:58.6: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5060 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:20.75 +10:55:25.6: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9802 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:48.89 +10:54:48.5: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1668 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:40.84 +16:14:55.9: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9949 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:30.93 +10:25:56.5: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2914 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:06.75 +17:33:22.0: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:06.75 +17:33:22.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:13:33.55 +13:03:28.5: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:22:14.37 +15:05:20.0: 14.89 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:18.99 +16:45:13.8: 15.18 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:23:37.96 +17:02:41.7: 14.67 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:25:43.01 +17:53:39.5: 15.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:11:44.94 +12:19:25.2: 14.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:31:17.81 +17:39:39.4: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:41:00.11 +10:07:48.7: 15.09 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:13:33.55 +13:03:28.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:18.99 +16:45:13.8: 15.06 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:22:14.37 +15:05:20.0: 14.97 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:25:43.01 +17:53:39.5: 15.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:11:44.94 +12:19:25.2: 14.87 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:18.99 +16:45:13.8: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0289 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:31:17.81 +17:39:39.4: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:44.94 +12:19:25.2: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6498 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:14.37 +15:05:20.0: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8307 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:43.01 +17:53:39.5: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8150 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:23:37.96 +17:02:41.7: 14.66 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:17.81 +17:39:39.4: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7381 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:37.96 +17:02:41.7: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6295 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:41:00.11 +10:07:48.7: 15.51 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:00.11 +10:07:48.7: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0143 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:29.59 +15:21:49.9: 15.04 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:10:36.43 +14:55:38.2: 15.35 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:10:54.98 +13:05:29.6: 15.61 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:09:45.74 +09:50:59.5: 15.40 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:11:39.82 +17:37:32.4: 15.41 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:40.49 +16:06:06.9: 15.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:10:54.98 +13:05:29.6: 15.37 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:10:36.43 +14:55:38.2: 15.65 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.48 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:54.98 +13:05:29.6: ref_mag=15.48 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0683 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:40.49 +16:06:06.9: 15.10 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:36.43 +14:55:38.2: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0786 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:11:39.82 +17:37:32.4: 15.33 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:40.49 +16:06:06.9: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0488 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:29.59 +15:21:49.9: 15.26 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:39.82 +17:37:32.4: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0923 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:09:45.74 +09:50:59.5: 15.11 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:29.59 +15:21:49.9: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0450 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:45.74 +09:50:59.5: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9785 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:34:27.93 +11:40:10.3: 15.44 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:34:27.93 +11:40:10.3: 15.10 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:27.93 +11:40:10.3: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9887 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:13:30.20 +14:22:27.3: 15.40 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:34:13.06 +18:04:06.8: 15.61 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:43:16.12 +18:05:50.2: 15.40 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:16.72 +18:06:49.4: 15.42 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:09:35.86 +12:34:30.8: 15.63 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:41:03.03 +14:27:24.3: 15.59 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:34:13.06 +18:04:06.8: 15.95 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:16.72 +18:06:49.4: 15.51 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:09:35.86 +12:34:30.8: 15.17 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.71 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:13.06 +18:04:06.8: ref_mag=15.71 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.1215 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:13:30.20 +14:22:27.3: 15.41 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:16.72 +18:06:49.4: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1268 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:35.86 +12:34:30.8: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.2698 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:43:16.12 +18:05:50.2: 15.32 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:30.20 +14:22:27.3: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1970 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:16.12 +18:05:50.2: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1424 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:41:03.03 +14:27:24.3: 15.57 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.58 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:03.03 +14:27:24.3: ref_mag=15.58 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.2414 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:36:32.36 +11:04:00.2: 15.42 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:36:32.36 +11:04:00.2: 15.85 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.54 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:32.36 +11:04:00.2: ref_mag=15.54 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0519 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:31:34.46 +11:44:50.2: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:31:34.46 +11:44:50.2: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77346.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80344.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81629.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84529.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75350_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 75350_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75352_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 75352_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75355_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 75355_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75361_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 75361_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75364_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 75364_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75381_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 75381_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77346_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
Preparing report for the candidate 77346_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78045_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 78045_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:59.62 +14:06:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78565_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 78565_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78633_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 78633_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:35.50 +17:25:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79125_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 79125_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:11.25 +17:52:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79342_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 79342_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:31.39 +14:25:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80033_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 80033_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:38.55 +17:55:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80344_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
Preparing report for the candidate 80344_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80401_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 80401_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:13.17 +16:26:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81629_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
Preparing report for the candidate 81629_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82176_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 82176_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:59.10 +18:07:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82726_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 82726_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82857_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 82857_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82891_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 82891_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83455_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 83455_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83469_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 83469_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83491_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 83491_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83536_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 83536_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83807_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 83807_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83837_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 83837_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83889_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 83889_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83915_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 83915_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83918_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 83918_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84056_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 84056_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84088_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 84088_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84175_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 84175_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84241_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 84241_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84319_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 84319_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84352_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 84352_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84409_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 84409_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84458_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 84458_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84462_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 84462_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84529_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
Preparing report for the candidate 84529_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475
The candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks