NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Tau-06-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    12.95    04:08:22.25 +17:45:01.2   2164 5518   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    13.01    04:08:22.25 +17:45:01.2   2158 5514   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 12.3546  2461325.8546  12.98  04:08:22.25 +17:45:01.2
175.36110 -24.48557 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
62 Erato                   -1      1       1  13.1    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:22.25 +17:45:01.2:  16.20 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:22.25 +17:45:01.2:  16.04 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-06-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    14.13    04:28:06.76 +17:33:21.6   5017 5340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    14.12    04:28:06.73 +17:33:22.3   5011 5336   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 12.3546  2461325.8546  14.12  04:28:06.75 +17:33:22.0
178.85181 -21.05048 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1171 Rusthawelia              0      0       0  14.2     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:06.75 +17:33:22.0:  16.29 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:06.75 +17:33:22.0:  16.19 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-06-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    14.47    04:13:33.56 +13:03:28.4   2853 2650   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    14.47    04:13:33.54 +13:03:28.6   2847 2646   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 12.3546  2461325.8546  14.47  04:13:33.55 +13:03:28.5
180.19605 -26.62100 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1115 Sabauda                 -0     -0       1  14.7    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:13:33.55 +13:03:28.5:  16.28 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:13:33.55 +13:03:28.5:  16.16 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-06-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    15.16    04:31:34.42 +11:44:50.0   5504 1824   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.48    04:31:34.51 +11:44:50.3   5498 1819   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 12.3546  2461325.8546  15.32  04:31:34.46 +11:44:50.2
184.35399 -23.98662 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
874 Rotraut                  1     -1       1  15.7     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:31:34.46 +11:44:50.2:  16.29 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:31:34.46 +11:44:50.2:  16.27 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-06-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 4

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 reference image: Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 reference image: Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits
Field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Tau-06-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Tau-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Tau-06-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 267575 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 267575 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits_preview.png'
Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits

renamed 'Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits_preview.png'
Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 559.8035 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 711.9893 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1092.8994 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 707.1184 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1091.9679 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 706.1456 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.95229 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.3500003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 19.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-12T03:30:05.0517145' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-12T08:30:05.0517145' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61325.3542251275 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-12T08:30:14.9559804' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61325.354339757 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 66.6626309002737 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0000403631932 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 62.9569444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 131.769444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.12239551181952 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 26 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20681 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20681 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.3500003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.3500003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 69.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.09 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 26.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.600688 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/d_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits :) Spent 0.570430 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/d_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.3600006103516 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 19.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-12T03:30:47.3445331' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-12T08:30:47.3445331' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61325.3547146297 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-12T08:30:57.2469404' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61325.3548292359 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 66.662630849595 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0000403677912 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 63.0655555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 132.058055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.12131497144687 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 26 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20681 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20681 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.3600006103516 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.3600006103516 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 69.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.09 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 26.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.600688 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/d_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits :) Spent 0.546745 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/d_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits


fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461325.85434087 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:39.898 +14:00:28.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 Second-epoch image center 04:26:39.898 +14:00:28.35 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0082 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:42.376 +14:00:55.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 Second-epoch image center 04:26:42.376 +14:00:55.45 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0188 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:26:39.898 +14:00:28.35 Second-epoch second image center 04:26:42.376 +14:00:55.45 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01253 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UyWIuYLnuL Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hx2JtMj5oR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dpugAeKxKo Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UirtyBL9Lb Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.989100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.989100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec +8.6216 to +19.2870 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec 8.6216 to 19.2870 deg Loaded 4407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3650 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3650 out of 8488 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=5.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 2.0 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 2.4 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits 2.3 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 15.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits 15.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.UyWIuYLnuL (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=728, bad_region=1955, passed=9344 Got 9344 stars (including 6757 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5361) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=1649 n_q2=740 n_q3=1787 n_q4=698 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Hx2JtMj5oR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=679, bad_region=1868, passed=8488 Got 8488 stars (including 6040 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6950 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6950 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6950 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=1626 n_q2=774 n_q3=1759 n_q4=714 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.402 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.dpugAeKxKo (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=549, bad_region=2558, passed=8405 Got 8405 stars (including 5453 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8405 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6345 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6345 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6345 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=8.115 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.366 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.366 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.480 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.819 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.819 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.463 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.463 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4885 robust_rms_before=1.182 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.360 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.508 worst_region_rms_after=0.463 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.007 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.463 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.508 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.508 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.360 arcsec matched=4885 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=1438 n_q2=992 n_q3=1502 n_q4=953 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.UirtyBL9Lb (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=549, bad_region=2541, passed=8326 Got 8326 stars (including 5389 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8326 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6285 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6285 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6285 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=8.133 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.263 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.263 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.519 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.828 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.828 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.391 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.471 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.471 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4889 robust_rms_before=1.232 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.404 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.391 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.490 worst_region_rms_after=0.471 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.029 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.471 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.490 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.490 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.404 arcsec matched=4889 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.472 n_q1=1451 n_q2=1003 n_q3=1498 n_q4=937 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.242 ref2=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.402 new1=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.073 new2=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.086 reference average sigma_overall=0.3245 worst_q_ratio=1.322 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474_astrometric_residuals.png (4885 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475_astrometric_residuals.png (4889 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:33:50.14 +13:06:46.2: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:57.78 +15:19:04.9: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:36:31.62 +16:29:05.6: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:33:50.14 +13:06:46.2: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:57.78 +15:19:04.9: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:36:31.62 +16:29:05.6: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:50.14 +13:06:46.2: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4511 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:31.62 +16:29:05.6: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3982 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:57.78 +15:19:04.9: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3767 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20119_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 20119_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    10.46    04:27:51.58 +10:00:50.4   4940 0771   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits **** FOUND 04:27:51.58 +10:00:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21390_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 21390_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    12.37    04:29:57.80 +15:19:05.1   5276 3983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    12.38    04:29:57.77 +15:19:04.7   5270 3979   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21418_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 21418_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    12.40    04:36:31.61 +16:29:05.7   6233 4689   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    12.40    04:36:31.62 +16:29:05.6   6227 4685   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21455_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 21455_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    12.44    04:33:50.15 +13:06:46.2   5839 2649   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    12.47    04:33:50.13 +13:06:46.1   5833 2644   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    9.52    04:29:11.71 +09:56:44.8   5139 0728   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits **** FOUND 04:29:11.70 +09:56:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    11.36    04:25:27.22 +16:33:20.8   4621 4733   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits **** FOUND 04:25:27.22 +16:33:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:39.898 +14:00:28.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 Second-epoch image center 04:26:39.898 +14:00:28.35 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0082 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:42.376 +14:00:55.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 Second-epoch image center 04:26:42.376 +14:00:55.45 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0188 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:26:39.898 +14:00:28.35 Second-epoch second image center 04:26:42.376 +14:00:55.45 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01253 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OF9VpQayrZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aYgGvjlJ5n Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DlR3rEcLI1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bCIT5nPue3 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.838400 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.838400 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.96 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.88 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.88
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=4.4) Read 58309 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec +8.6064 to +19.2869 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec 8.6064 to 19.2869 deg Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3131 out of 3673 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3673 out of 58309 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=4.3) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 40 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 1.8 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 2.2 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits 2.1 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.9 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 15.8 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 15.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits 15.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.OF9VpQayrZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=3506, bad_region=10392, passed=62254 Got 62254 stars (including 48728 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62254 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53923 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53923 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53923 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1625 n_q2=733 n_q3=1802 n_q4=721 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.aYgGvjlJ5n (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=3080, bad_region=9253, passed=58303 Got 58303 stars (including 46293 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58303 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50853 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50853 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50854 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.251 n_q1=1612 n_q2=760 n_q3=1786 n_q4=722 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.387 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.DlR3rEcLI1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2591, bad_region=12196, passed=50468 Got 50468 stars (including 36517 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50468 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40969 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40969 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40969 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=7.999 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.247 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.247 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.481 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.861 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.861 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.348 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.473 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.473 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4884 robust_rms_before=1.161 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.352 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.348 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.493 worst_region_rms_after=0.473 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.991 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.473 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.493 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.493 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.352 arcsec matched=4884 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=1475 n_q2=988 n_q3=1469 n_q4=952 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.067 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.bCIT5nPue3 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2673, bad_region=12369, passed=51206 Got 51206 stars (including 37055 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51206 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41570 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41570 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41570 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5374) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=8.059 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.464 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.464 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.522 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.796 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.796 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.385 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.476 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.476 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4885 robust_rms_before=1.204 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.400 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.385 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.500 worst_region_rms_after=0.476 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.007 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.476 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.500 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.500 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.400 arcsec matched=4885 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.460 n_q1=1486 n_q2=989 n_q3=1464 n_q4=946 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:40.84 +16:14:55.9: 14.85 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:22:20.75 +10:55:25.6: 15.07 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:48.89 +10:54:48.5: 15.16 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:21:44.42 +14:54:09.0: 15.43 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:10:44.31 +12:05:45.2: 15.02 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:17:30.93 +10:25:56.5: 13.97 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:22.25 +17:45:01.2: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:42:39.31 +17:52:58.6: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:10:44.31 +12:05:45.2: 15.08 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:21:44.42 +14:54:09.0: 15.13 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:22.25 +17:45:01.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:42:39.31 +17:52:58.6: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:22:20.75 +10:55:25.6: 15.05 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:40.84 +16:14:55.9: 14.94 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:48.89 +10:54:48.5: 15.02 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:17:30.93 +10:25:56.5: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:44.42 +14:54:09.0: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1695 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:44.31 +12:05:45.2: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9003 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:39.31 +17:52:58.6: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5060 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:20.75 +10:55:25.6: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9802 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:48.89 +10:54:48.5: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1668 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:40.84 +16:14:55.9: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9949 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:30.93 +10:25:56.5: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2914 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:06.75 +17:33:22.0: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:06.75 +17:33:22.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:13:33.55 +13:03:28.5: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:22:14.37 +15:05:20.0: 14.89 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:18.99 +16:45:13.8: 15.18 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:23:37.96 +17:02:41.7: 14.67 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:25:43.01 +17:53:39.5: 15.06 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:11:44.94 +12:19:25.2: 14.62 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:31:17.81 +17:39:39.4: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:41:00.11 +10:07:48.7: 15.09 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:13:33.55 +13:03:28.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:18.99 +16:45:13.8: 15.06 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:22:14.37 +15:05:20.0: 14.97 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:25:43.01 +17:53:39.5: 15.05 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:11:44.94 +12:19:25.2: 14.87 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:18.99 +16:45:13.8: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0289 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:31:17.81 +17:39:39.4: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:44.94 +12:19:25.2: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6498 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:14.37 +15:05:20.0: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8307 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:43.01 +17:53:39.5: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8150 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:23:37.96 +17:02:41.7: 14.66 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:17.81 +17:39:39.4: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7381 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:37.96 +17:02:41.7: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6295 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:41:00.11 +10:07:48.7: 15.51 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:00.11 +10:07:48.7: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0143 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:29.59 +15:21:49.9: 15.04 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:10:36.43 +14:55:38.2: 15.35 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:10:54.98 +13:05:29.6: 15.61 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:09:45.74 +09:50:59.5: 15.40 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:11:39.82 +17:37:32.4: 15.41 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:40.49 +16:06:06.9: 15.21 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:10:54.98 +13:05:29.6: 15.37 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:10:36.43 +14:55:38.2: 15.65 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.48 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:54.98 +13:05:29.6: ref_mag=15.48 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0683 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:40.49 +16:06:06.9: 15.10 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:36.43 +14:55:38.2: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0786 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:11:39.82 +17:37:32.4: 15.33 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:40.49 +16:06:06.9: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0488 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:29.59 +15:21:49.9: 15.26 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:39.82 +17:37:32.4: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0923 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:09:45.74 +09:50:59.5: 15.11 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:29.59 +15:21:49.9: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0450 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:45.74 +09:50:59.5: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9785 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:34:27.93 +11:40:10.3: 15.44 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:34:27.93 +11:40:10.3: 15.10 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:27.93 +11:40:10.3: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9887 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:13:30.20 +14:22:27.3: 15.40 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:34:13.06 +18:04:06.8: 15.61 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:43:16.12 +18:05:50.2: 15.40 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:16.72 +18:06:49.4: 15.42 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:09:35.86 +12:34:30.8: 15.63 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:41:03.03 +14:27:24.3: 15.59 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:34:13.06 +18:04:06.8: 15.95 +/- 0.29 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:16.72 +18:06:49.4: 15.51 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:09:35.86 +12:34:30.8: 15.17 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.71 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:13.06 +18:04:06.8: ref_mag=15.71 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.1215 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:13:30.20 +14:22:27.3: 15.41 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:16.72 +18:06:49.4: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1268 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:35.86 +12:34:30.8: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.2698 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:43:16.12 +18:05:50.2: 15.32 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:30.20 +14:22:27.3: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1970 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:16.12 +18:05:50.2: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1424 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:41:03.03 +14:27:24.3: 15.57 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.58 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:03.03 +14:27:24.3: ref_mag=15.58 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.2414 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:36:32.36 +11:04:00.2: 15.42 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:36:32.36 +11:04:00.2: 15.85 +/- 0.28 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.54 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:32.36 +11:04:00.2: ref_mag=15.54 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0519 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:31:34.46 +11:44:50.2: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:31:34.46 +11:44:50.2: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77346.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80344.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81629.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84529.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75350_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 75350_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    15.11    04:21:44.38 +14:54:09.1   4075 3744   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.25    04:21:44.45 +14:54:08.9   4069 3739   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75352_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 75352_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    15.17    04:27:48.87 +10:54:48.8   4944 1322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.17    04:27:48.92 +10:54:48.3   4938 1317   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75355_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 75355_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    15.03    04:22:20.70 +10:55:25.2   4131 1336   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    14.94    04:22:20.79 +10:55:26.0   4125 1332   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75361_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 75361_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    14.90    04:10:44.38 +12:05:45.4   2421 2077   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    14.90    04:10:44.25 +12:05:45.1   2414 2072   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75364_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 75364_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    14.96    04:27:40.81 +16:14:54.9   4948 4548   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.07    04:27:40.88 +16:14:56.8   4942 4544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75381_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 75381_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    14.29    04:17:30.97 +10:25:56.2   3407 1047   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    14.29    04:17:30.90 +10:25:56.7   3401 1043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77346_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 Preparing report for the candidate 77346_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78045_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 78045_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    13.37    04:21:59.59 +14:06:14.4   4099 3256   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits **** FOUND 04:21:59.62 +14:06:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78565_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 78565_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    13.50    04:42:39.29 +17:52:58.4   7119 5547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    13.51    04:42:39.34 +17:52:58.7   7113 5542   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78633_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 78633_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    13.52    04:38:35.49 +17:25:28.3   6525 5257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits **** FOUND 04:38:35.50 +17:25:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79125_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 79125_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    13.83    04:39:11.21 +17:52:55.5   6610 5536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits **** FOUND 04:39:11.25 +17:52:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79342_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 79342_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    13.90    04:21:31.39 +14:25:59.2   4033 3456   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits **** FOUND 04:21:31.39 +14:25:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80033_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 80033_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    13.99    04:25:38.50 +17:55:23.1   4656 5562   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits **** FOUND 04:25:38.55 +17:55:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80344_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 Preparing report for the candidate 80344_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80401_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 80401_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    14.35    04:36:13.13 +16:26:51.2   6182 4662   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits **** FOUND 04:36:13.17 +16:26:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81629_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 Preparing report for the candidate 81629_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82176_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 82176_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    14.60    04:40:59.10 +18:07:10.1   6870 5683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits **** FOUND 04:40:59.10 +18:07:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82726_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 82726_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    14.72    04:23:37.91 +17:02:42.4   4366 5037   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    14.57    04:23:38.00 +17:02:41.0   4361 5032   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82857_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 82857_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    14.74    04:31:17.81 +17:39:38.9   5477 5402   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    14.74    04:31:17.80 +17:39:40.0   5470 5398   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82891_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 82891_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    14.76    04:11:44.94 +12:19:25.3   2574 2211   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    14.58    04:11:44.93 +12:19:25.2   2568 2207   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83455_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 83455_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    14.84    04:25:43.02 +17:53:39.9   4673 5549   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    14.80    04:25:42.99 +17:53:39.1   4667 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83469_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 83469_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    14.92    04:08:19.23 +16:45:11.8   2140 4911   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.22    04:08:18.76 +16:45:15.7   2133 4907   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83491_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 83491_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    14.85    04:22:14.32 +15:05:19.8   4149 3855   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    14.82    04:22:14.42 +15:05:20.3   4143 3851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83536_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 83536_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    14.96    04:41:00.11 +10:07:49.7   6911 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.19    04:41:00.11 +10:07:47.6   6904 0835   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83807_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 83807_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    15.01    04:11:39.79 +17:37:31.8   2640 5426   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.22    04:11:39.85 +17:37:33.0   2634 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83837_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 83837_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    14.97    04:27:29.55 +15:21:48.7   4917 4013   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.16    04:27:29.64 +15:21:51.1   4911 4009   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83889_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 83889_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    14.98    04:09:45.70 +09:50:58.5   2237 0713   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    14.98    04:09:45.79 +09:51:00.4   2231 0708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83915_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 83915_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    15.03    04:08:40.52 +16:06:05.7   2181 4513   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.07    04:08:40.45 +16:06:08.0   2175 4509   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83918_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 83918_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    15.07    04:10:36.47 +14:55:38.4   2446 3793   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.10    04:10:36.39 +14:55:38.0   2439 3788   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84056_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 84056_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    15.07    04:10:55.02 +13:05:30.5   2463 2680   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.07    04:10:54.94 +13:05:28.7   2456 2675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84088_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 84088_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    14.98    04:34:27.97 +11:40:10.1   5932 1775   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.00    04:34:27.89 +11:40:10.5   5926 1771   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84175_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 84175_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    15.05    04:38:16.70 +18:06:49.0   6485 5681   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.23    04:38:16.74 +18:06:49.8   6479 5676   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84241_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 84241_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    15.07    04:43:16.12 +18:05:50.3   7207 5679   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.24    04:43:16.13 +18:05:50.1   7201 5674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84319_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 84319_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    15.14    04:13:30.23 +14:22:26.1   2863 3447   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.27    04:13:30.17 +14:22:28.5   2857 3443   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84352_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 84352_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    15.26    04:09:35.87 +12:34:31.2   2259 2371   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.30    04:09:35.85 +12:34:30.5   2252 2367   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84409_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 84409_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    15.12    04:34:13.10 +18:04:08.4   5899 5650   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.12    04:34:13.01 +18:04:05.2   5892 5645   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84458_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 84458_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    15.17    04:41:03.01 +14:27:24.1   6899 3465   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.38    04:41:03.05 +14:27:24.5   6892 3460   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84462_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 84462_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.35434    2461325.85434    15.09    04:36:32.40 +11:03:59.4   6241 1409   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0474.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    15.03    04:36:32.32 +11:04:00.9   6235 1405   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84529_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 Preparing report for the candidate 84529_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 The candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 12.35483    2461325.85483    9.63    04:29:11.71 +09:56:44.8   5139 0728   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_034448_TTUQ2b1x1_987936_jB9V7Ef0/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-30-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0475.fits **** FOUND 04:29:11.70 +09:56:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 04:08:22.25 +17:45:01.2 04:28:06.75 +17:33:22.0 04:13:33.55 +13:03:28.5 04:31:34.46 +11:44:50.2 ########### Completed Tau-06-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 04:08:22.25 +17:45:01.2 04:28:06.75 +17:33:22.0 04:13:33.55 +13:03:28.5 04:31:34.46 +11:44:50.2 ################################################################################### 04:08:22.25 +17:45:01.2 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 04:28:06.75 +17:33:22.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 04:13:33.55 +13:03:28.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 04:31:34.46 +11:44:50.2 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461325.85434087 -observatory V36 14:41:10.75 -18:41:58.1 Mercury (0.0mag) 14:06:04.02 -20:49:17.1 Venus (-4.5mag) 08:42:09.05 +19:29:34.0 Mars (1.0mag) 09:34:58.70 +15:02:30.6 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:42:10.14 +01:35:11.2 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:11:58.81 +20:57:42.5 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:15.09 -00:26:13.0 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:10.30 -23:43:29.8 Pluto (14.5mag) 14:19:15.08 -19:09:31.9 Moon (-8.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 12 03:47 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461325.85434087: 09:35:05.91 +15:01:51.6 Io (6.1mag) 09:35:02.88 +15:02:09.6 Europa (6.2mag) 09:35:15.23 +15:00:59.6 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:34:41.42 +15:04:04.6 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:34:47.57 +15:22:45.3 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:35:02.64 +15:02:10.7 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:33:36.06 +15:24:23.1 Elara (17.5mag) 09:37:21.33 +14:25:24.1 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:33:30.78 +15:29:49.6 Carme (18.8mag) 00:41:55.76 +01:35:15.0 Titan (8.2mag) 00:42:06.47 +01:35:15.2 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:41:41.43 +01:32:24.4 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:41:56.37 +01:34:53.7 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:40:29.11 +01:22:50.7 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 12 03:47 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461325.85434087: 02:54:59.80 +21:20:05.4 JWST 18:50:37.81 +09:23:15.8 Chandra 06:53:06.46 +01:00:48.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 12 03:47 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461325.85434087 -observatory V36 03:45:51.23 +20:12:05.2 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:25:34.87 -33:28:25.8 14.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:40:12.02 -72:27:56.6 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:45.26 +34:40:43.4 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 07:30:33.44 +25:26:55.5 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:02:23.72 +35:46:14.3 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:26:58.56 +41:29:00.5 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:46:14.77 -13:36:05.9 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:18:53.92 +15:54:54.4 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:51:57.56 -02:48:03.9 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:46:35.12 +64:49:49.7 15.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:35:02.28 +43:08:56.7 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:46:35.25 +14:21:30.7 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:29:27.77 -24:49:25.4 13.0mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 00:24:37.91 +18:51:18.4 17.6mag 2P/Encke 22:59:20.73 -31:29:00.8 14.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:12:07.49 +38:34:18.9 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:11:52.83 -08:14:29.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:21:48.60 -08:53:57.1 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:37:03.84 +15:54:28.7 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 02:59:05.77 +14:17:39.9 17.7mag 88P/Howell 07:42:28.88 +40:31:22.9 17.0mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:04:53.99 +13:48:05.3 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:43:00.16 +13:02:23.6 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 14:09:08.44 -32:29:21.7 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos 06:51:30.64 +19:16:00.2 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 21:31:27.27 +04:12:55.3 9.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:20:53.73 +01:25:27.1 14.4mag 169P/NEAT 03:28:48.18 +04:28:37.5 14.9mag 220P/McNaught 06:04:55.78 +45:25:49.7 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 07:29:01.64 +25:35:35.4 17.9mag 266P/Christensen 09:57:12.50 +31:34:05.6 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Oct 12 03:47 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70 ASASSN-26fk 2026-10-5.53 -3.9 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 12 03:47 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 12 03:47 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 16:25:23.459 -21:49:24.28 AT 2026adbg 2026-08-11.27 21.47 06:39:10.820 +32:01:59.15 AT 2026adbf 2026-09-12.60 19.69 04:26:40.357 -28:38:15.92 AT 2026adbe 2026-09-24.61 20.77 01:03:16.805 +12:28:54.71 AT 2026adbd 2026-09-13.44 21.76 01:34:02.007 -10:26:08.59 AT 2026adbc 2026-08-12.57 21.81 16:52:56.442 +19:24:13.94 AT 2026adbb 2026-08-07.33 21.82 02:43:42.829 -11:48:08.95 AT 2026adba 2026-09-04.58 21.37 20:50:13.384 -29:30:27.03 AT 2026adaz 2026-09-04.29 20.99 02:42:43.756 +10:45:56.65 AT 2026aday 2026-09-24.46 20.28 18:06:19.544 +25:37:47.03 AT 2026adax 2026-09-03.31 21.27 21:46:09.969 -47:07:16.20 AT 2026adaw 2026-09-15.33 20.34 01:57:46.153 +07:59:41.04 AT 2026adav 2026-08-09.56 21.83 22:56:16.562 -04:40:20.57 AT 2026adau 2026-09-10.39 20.79 02:57:39.200 -36:53:05.12 AT 2026adat 2026-09-16.55 20.94 21:49:33.259 +17:15:20.40 AT 2026adas 2026-09-14.27 21.5 23:05:07.184 -30:28:09.92 AT 2026adar 2026-09-16.41 20.87 21:17:39.325 +21:37:31.98 AT 2026adaq 2026-09-14.26 21.08 17:42:08.778 +27:54:01.84 AT 2026adap 2026-08-08.36 21.71 23:53:19.821 -13:46:16.12 AT 2026adao 2026-08-13.48 20.87 15:24:32.777 +01:18:21.71 AT 2026adan 2026-08-07.28 21.89 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 12 03:47 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C