This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2187* 05 21 07.64 +23 38 19.8 10.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461325.7187,10.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261012.2187 10.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2187 2461325.7187 11.06 05:20:17.71 +23:33:07.4
181.45190 -7.68714 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 1 0 1 11.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:17.71 +23:33:07.4: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:17.71 +23:33:07.4: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2187* 05 20 17.71 +23 33 07.4 11.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7187,11.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2187 11.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2187* 05 21 07.64 +23 38 19.9 10.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461325.7187,10.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261012.2187 10.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2187 2461325.7187 12.11 05:06:11.09 +26:08:14.7
177.45458 -8.81807 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -0 0 1 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:06:11.09 +26:08:14.7: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:06:11.09 +26:08:14.7: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2187* 05 06 11.09 +26 08 14.7 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7187,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2187 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2187 2461325.7187 12.93 05:17:28.01 +21:15:04.8
183.00705 -9.51920 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -0 -0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:28.01 +21:15:04.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:28.01 +21:15:04.8: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2187* 05 17 28.01 +21 15 04.8 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7187,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2187 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2187 2461325.7187 12.68 06:03:55.10 +25:08:46.0
185.32944 1.59935 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia 1 -0 1 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:55.10 +25:08:46.0: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:55.10 +25:08:46.0: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7187,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2187 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461325.71900576 12.10.2026 05:15:12.098 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20385
Objects passed selection criteria: 20320
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16419.2
Average stars matched: 16184.5 (98.5703 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 245528 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 00:22:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461325.71900576 12.10.2026 05:15:12.098 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 164
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 116 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 151556
Objects passed selection criteria: 151203
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 122516
Average stars matched: 118794 (96.9616 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 616232 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 00:25:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461325.71841302
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.700 +21:57:30.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:18.700 +21:57:30.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0411 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:15.917 +21:57:46.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:15.917 +21:57:46.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0392 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:18.700 +21:57:30.21
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:15.917 +21:57:46.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01162 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xRXK3aHtew
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ArtIhWUCza
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VMMbqDlALY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VIy2IpvqkI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.xRXK3aHtew (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ArtIhWUCza (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4715 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4715 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=906 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VMMbqDlALY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=569, bad_region=0, passed=11026
Got 11026 stars (including 10446 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11026 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4795 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11026 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4794 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11026 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11026 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4729 stars left (next iteration limit 5203)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4729 robust_rms=9.841 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.850 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.850 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4729 robust_rms=0.670 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.244 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.244 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4729 robust_rms=0.439 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.616 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.616 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4729 robust_rms_before=1.461 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.449 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.439 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.665 worst_region_rms_after=0.616 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.417 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.616
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.665 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.665 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.449 arcsec matched=4729
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits N_match=4729 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1010 n_q2=1356 n_q3=842 n_q4=1521 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.276
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VIy2IpvqkI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=585, bad_region=0, passed=11111
Got 11111 stars (including 10517 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11111 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4791 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4727 stars left (next iteration limit 5197)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=10.094 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.670 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.670 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=0.667 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.311 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.311 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=0.477 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.622 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.599 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4727 robust_rms_before=1.584 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.449 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.477 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.659 worst_region_rms_after=0.622 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.436 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.599
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.659 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.659 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.449 arcsec matched=4727
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits N_match=4727 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=1015 n_q2=1356 n_q3=833 n_q4=1523 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.488 worst_q_ratio=1.234
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits sigma_overall=0.445 worst_q_ratio=1.276
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits sigma_overall=0.464 worst_q_ratio=1.228
reference average sigma_overall=0.4325 worst_q_ratio=1.2345
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4715 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248_astrometric_residuals.png (4729 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249_astrometric_residuals.png (4727 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:17.71 +23:33:07.4: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:17.71 +23:33:07.4: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30750.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 23s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30668_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 30668_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:38.47 +23:38:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30734_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 30734_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30750_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 30750_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.45 +17:54:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:04.03 +20:30:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:49.05 +20:10:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 27s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:20:17.71 +23:33:07.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.700 +21:57:30.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:18.700 +21:57:30.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0411 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:15.917 +21:57:46.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:15.917 +21:57:46.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0392 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:18.700 +21:57:30.21
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:15.917 +21:57:46.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01162 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F68xNzMlEo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OMTg4wBY3Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BvnZxfs3w4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9H5PtAs1c7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 157 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.F68xNzMlEo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OMTg4wBY3Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4710 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4710 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=977 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.BvnZxfs3w4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4589, bad_region=29, passed=80424
Got 80424 stars (including 75691 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80424 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80424 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80424 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80424 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4721 stars left (next iteration limit 5192)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=10.077 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.850 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.850 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=0.686 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.206 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.206 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=0.444 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.627 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.627 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4721 robust_rms_before=1.446 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.423 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.444 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.635 worst_region_rms_after=0.627 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.361 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.627
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.635 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.635 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.423 arcsec matched=4721
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits N_match=4721 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.362 n_q1=1037 n_q2=1317 n_q3=831 n_q4=1536 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9H5PtAs1c7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4775, bad_region=29, passed=81558
Got 81558 stars (including 76642 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 81558 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4779 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81558 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4780 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81558 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81558 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4725 stars left (next iteration limit 5197)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4725 robust_rms=10.339 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.736 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.736 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4725 robust_rms=0.661 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.258 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.258 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4725 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.623 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.594 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4725 robust_rms_before=1.561 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.422 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.472 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.640 worst_region_rms_after=0.623 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.379 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.594
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.640 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.640 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.422 arcsec matched=4725
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits N_match=4725 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=1036 n_q2=1322 n_q3=830 n_q4=1537 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_001558_TTUQ1b1x1_2555047_PdKoJ9rH/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:48:28.60 +23:17:52.7: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:47.64 +24:09:51.7: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:08:11.88 +19:59:56.0: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:04.49 +22:02:01.2: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:46.32 +20:46:33.0: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:04.49 +22:02:01.2: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:48:28.60 +23:17:52.7: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:47.64 +24:09:51.7: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:08:11.88 +19:59:56.0: 14.44 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:04.49 +22:02:01.2: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8934 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:28.60 +23:17:52.7: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6655 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:47.64 +24:09:51.7: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0303 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:11.88 +19:59:56.0: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0461 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:52:40.32 +22:01:25.3: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:46.32 +20:46:33.0: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:46.32 +20:46:33.0: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4393 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:51:28.50 +18:35:08.4: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:52:40.32 +22:01:25.3: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:40.32 +22:01:25.3: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2862 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:07.18 +19:55:45.5: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:56.28 +20:14:27.7: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:51:28.50 +18:35:08.4: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:28.50 +18:35:08.4: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8635 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:11:57.34 +24:42:00.2: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:07.18 +19:55:45.5: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:07.18 +19:55:45.5: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2138 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:56.28 +20:14:27.7: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:56.28 +20:14:27.7: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0914 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:01:41.77 +20:49:29.2: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:11:57.34 +24:42:00.2: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:57.34 +24:42:00.2: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2717 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:06:11.09 +26:08:14.7: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:01:41.77 +20:49:29.2: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:41.77 +20:49:29.2: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5777 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:06:11.09 +26:08:14.7: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:07:15.64 +25:16:11.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:07:15.64 +25:16:11.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:15.64 +25:16:11.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:28.01 +21:15:04.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:28.01 +21:15:04.8: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:59.76 +22:34:32.6: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:24:57.01 +19:12:07.9: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:59.76 +22:34:32.6: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:59.76 +22:34:32.6: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9864 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:24:57.01 +19:12:07.9: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:57.01 +19:12:07.9: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1730 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.64 +25:20:29.5: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.64 +25:20:29.5: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.64 +25:20:29.5: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3117 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:14.72 +22:33:52.1: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:14.72 +22:33:52.1: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:14.72 +22:33:52.1: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4874 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:15:00.47 +20:57:18.5: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:36:37.95 +18:57:28.3: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:15:00.47 +20:57:18.5: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:00.47 +20:57:18.5: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6265 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:36:37.95 +18:57:28.3: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:37.95 +18:57:28.3: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4462 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:45.88 +21:33:03.1: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:42.89 +19:58:15.7: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:45.88 +21:33:03.1: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:45.88 +21:33:03.1: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7872 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:38:53.72 +18:38:44.4: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:42.89 +19:58:15.7: 14.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:42.89 +19:58:15.7: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8110 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:38:53.72 +18:38:44.4: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:53.72 +18:38:44.4: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7553 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:55.10 +25:08:46.0: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:55.10 +25:08:46.0: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190863.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191276.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out26136.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190565_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190565_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190577_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190577_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:01.89 +20:10:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:28.35 +21:30:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190583_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190583_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:06.82 +21:31:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:29.78 +18:57:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190593_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190593_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.38 +23:56:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190594_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190594_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:37.25 +17:36:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190595_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190595_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:39.34 +18:12:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:30.28 +19:22:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190602_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190602_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:56.37 +23:05:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190604_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190604_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190606_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190606_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190607_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190607_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:43.60 +23:01:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190608_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190608_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:30.98 +18:09:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190615_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190615_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190616_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190616_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:37.25 +19:47:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190621_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190621_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:25.14 +25:56:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190622_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190622_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:06.29 +17:57:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190623_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190623_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:16.65 +25:47:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190626_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190626_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190627_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190627_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190628_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190628_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:54.28 +18:25:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190629_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190629_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:20.64 +18:14:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190632_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190632_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:26.63 +25:17:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190634_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190634_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190637_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190637_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:49.01 +18:33:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190638_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190638_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:16.15 +17:13:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190639_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190639_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.21 +18:20:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190641_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190641_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:58.08 +22:41:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190643_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190643_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:11.08 +18:32:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:29.69 +16:41:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190703_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190703_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:16.84 +20:08:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190719_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 190719_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190730_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190730_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:17.71 +23:33:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190732_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190732_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:58.95 +26:19:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190778_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190778_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190863_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 190863_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190913_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190913_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.12 +22:38:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190988_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190988_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.84 +25:55:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190999_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 190999_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.71 +22:27:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191012_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191012_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.84 +23:48:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191046_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191046_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191092_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191092_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.98 +26:25:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:41.71 +23:02:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191143_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191143_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:05.22 +17:03:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191153_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191153_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.72 +19:34:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191176_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191176_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.63 +20:46:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191226_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191226_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.39 +18:33:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191240_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191240_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.25 +18:59:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191268_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191268_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.42 +18:52:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 191276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191283_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191283_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.94 +20:10:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191316_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191316_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:23.28 +25:24:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191321_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191321_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:10.77 +25:24:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191336_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191336_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.28 +22:45:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191341_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191341_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:55.90 +24:36:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191362_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191362_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:23.05 +26:26:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191364_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191364_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.22 +23:00:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191375_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191375_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:48.68 +25:09:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191414_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191414_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.80 +18:25:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191441_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191441_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.24 +20:53:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191446_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191446_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:36.25 +18:33:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191454_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191454_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:02.93 +18:33:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191455_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191455_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:21.40 +26:25:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191472_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191472_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191480_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191480_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191507_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191507_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.82 +19:32:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:58.60 +23:15:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191513_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191513_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.56 +21:46:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191515_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191515_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.34 +25:47:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191520_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191520_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.54 +20:05:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191551_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191551_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:14.99 +19:35:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191554_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191554_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:40.38 +20:26:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191575_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191575_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.81 +23:11:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:57.41 +19:43:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.27 +18:40:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191614_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191614_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.86 +17:11:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191621_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191621_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.33 +23:07:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191625_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191625_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191664_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191664_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:51.88 +18:15:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191669_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191669_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:00.37 +25:58:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191686_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191686_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.67 +25:22:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191687_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191687_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:40.12 +22:58:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191689_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191689_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.33 +25:09:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191693_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191693_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:14.97 +17:43:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191705_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191705_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:20.03 +24:24:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191708_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191708_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:18.10 +23:13:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191714_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191714_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:56.25 +26:13:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191732_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191732_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:01.87 +25:15:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191772_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191772_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.39 +20:56:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191786_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191786_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:43.30 +26:18:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191789_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191789_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.34 +20:09:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191796_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191796_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191819_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191819_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:27.48 +21:47:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191829_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191829_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:50.99 +20:15:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191838_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191838_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:29.20 +18:44:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191897_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191897_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:58.84 +25:07:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191903_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191903_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:51.78 +20:00:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191910_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191910_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:11.62 +25:41:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191913_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191913_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:06.97 +24:22:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191915_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191915_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:05.45 +22:29:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191919_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191919_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:50.23 +25:14:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191924_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191924_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:04.08 +19:09:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191928_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191928_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:30.04 +21:59:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191929_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191929_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:24.55 +22:16:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191942_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191942_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:06.38 +24:25:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191962_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191962_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:15.71 +18:46:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:02.43 +24:22:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191992_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 191992_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.51 +20:26:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192004_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192004_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192020_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192020_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.32 +24:57:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192025_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192025_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:36.79 +24:06:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192040_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192040_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.56 +21:24:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192057_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192057_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:57.07 +19:31:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192066_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192066_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:20.90 +24:22:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:05.32 +23:57:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192080_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192080_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192102_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192102_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:08.27 +22:06:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:21.88 +24:21:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192134_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192134_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:56.30 +22:27:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192138_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192138_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:37.20 +23:38:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192141_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192141_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192148_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192148_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:58.95 +21:26:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192161_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192161_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:33.67 +21:19:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192292_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192292_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:34.69 +17:59:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192323_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192323_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192325_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192325_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.90 +23:13:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192332_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192332_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:57.55 +20:39:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192350_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 192350_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:12.12 +19:49:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.46 +17:54:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:36.21 +25:59:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.19 +24:10:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 63572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.03 +22:46:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:12.54 +19:30:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 56378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:34.73 +23:22:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:18.05 +24:59:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26136_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 26136_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.40 +26:13:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.80 +23:10:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 37049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:50.33 +24:45:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:37.33 +20:19:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 80011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:23.44 +21:44:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.78 +19:21:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:30.77 +22:47:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.14 +20:22:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.48 +20:22:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.17 +17:53:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.05 +21:51:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.41 +23:51:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-15-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
