This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4906 2461324.9906 11.64 00:53:33.10 +38:49:43.1
123.38268 -24.04126 galactic And Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.4" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:53:33.10 +38:49:43.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 00:53:33.10 +38:49:43.1: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 00:53:33.10 +38:49:43.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.4906* 00 53 33.10 +38 49 43.1 11.6 U And 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9906,11.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4906 11.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4906 2461324.9906 12.24 01:45:40.76 +39:33:30.3
134.18480 -22.12518 galactic And Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.6" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 01:45:40.76 +39:33:30.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:45:40.76 +39:33:30.3: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:45:40.76 +39:33:30.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.4906* 01 45 40.76 +39 33 30.3 12.2 U And 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9906,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4906 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4906 2461324.9906 12.08 01:39:38.69 +33:53:52.6
134.24226 -27.91285 galactic Tri Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 01:39:38.69 +33:53:52.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.350+/-0.032 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:39:38.69 +33:53:52.6: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:39:38.69 +33:53:52.6: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.4906* 01 39 38.69 +33 53 52.6 12.1 U Tri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9906,12.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4906 12.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4906 2461324.9906 12.04 01:35:24.55 +34:34:38.9
133.11992 -27.42290 galactic Tri Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 01:35:24.55 +34:34:38.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:35:24.55 +34:34:38.9: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:35:24.55 +34:34:38.9: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.4906* 01 35 24.55 +34 34 38.9 12.0 U Tri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9906,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4906 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4906 2461324.9906 11.81 01:38:01.26 +34:19:25.8
133.77133 -27.56553 galactic Tri Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 317871732168262272 | 01:38:01.30 +34:19:26.7 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: K1 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.562+/-0.028 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:38:01.26 +34:19:25.8: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:38:01.26 +34:19:25.8: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.4906* 01 38 01.26 +34 19 25.8 11.8 U Tri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 317871732168262272,2461324.9906,11.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 317871732168262272 20261011.4906 11.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.93192712 13.07.2026 10:21:48.503 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
First image: 2461234.93192712 13.07.2026 10:21:48.503 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Last image: 2461324.99088314 11.10.2026 11:46:42.303 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13815
Objects passed selection criteria: 13731
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.1 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.1 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7758.5
Average stars matched: 7479.5 (96.4039 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239444 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 11 06:50:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 83 -> 64, 22.892% > 20%; fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits vs fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.93192712 13.07.2026 10:21:48.503 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
First image: 2461234.93192712 13.07.2026 10:21:48.503 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Last image: 2461324.99088314 11.10.2026 11:46:42.303 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 207
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.96
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 78129
Objects passed selection criteria: 77829
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 46756.8
Average stars matched: 43903.8 (93.8982 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 298676 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 11 06:51:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461324.99038963
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:23.432 +37:58:14.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:37.138 +37:58:34.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:05:23.432 +37:58:14.56
Second-epoch image center 01:05:37.138 +37:58:34.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0454 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:37.725 +37:58:42.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:05:23.432 +37:58:14.56
Second-epoch image center 01:05:37.725 +37:58:42.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0476 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:05:37.138 +37:58:34.57
Second-epoch second image center 01:05:37.725 +37:58:42.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00288 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Cq8hKtVIDo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B2oemNofe3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OOMXxhAQg3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bgWW0yZ9o8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits and wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits and wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits and wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits) and catalog (wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14637 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.6836 to 26.9263 deg, Dec +32.3324 to +43.2291 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.6836 to 26.9263 deg, Dec 32.3324 to 43.2291 deg
Loaded 11783 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8663 out of 9067 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9067 out of 14637 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.607300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.607300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14637 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.6836 to 26.9263 deg, Dec +32.3324 to +43.2291 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.6836 to 26.9263 deg, Dec 32.3324 to 43.2291 deg
Loaded 11783 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8663 out of 9067 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9067 out of 14637 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 14958 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.6826 to 26.9759 deg, Dec +32.4009 to +43.2800 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.6826 to 26.9759 deg, Dec 32.4009 to 43.2800 deg
Loaded 11830 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8695 out of 9148 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9148 out of 14958 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
2.3 pix And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
2.4 pix fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
2.4 pix fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
15.4 mag. And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
12.4 mag. fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
12.6 mag. fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.4 (SNR ) 9.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Cq8hKtVIDo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=921, bad_region=0, passed=14637
Got 14637 stars (including 13709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14637 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4816 stars left (next iteration limit 5296)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits N_match=4816 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.600 n_q1=1052 n_q2=1027 n_q3=1411 n_q4=1326 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -region wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.B2oemNofe3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits' -> 'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1034, bad_region=0, passed=14958
Got 14958 stars (including 13907 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14958 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4816 stars left (next iteration limit 5299)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits N_match=4816 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.535 n_q1=1057 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1385 n_q4=1339 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits -region wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OOMXxhAQg3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=27, bad_region=0, passed=800
Got 800 stars (including 772 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 730 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 658 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 726 stars left (next iteration limit 797)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=726 robust_rms=13.869 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.625 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.256 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=726 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.641 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.632 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=726 robust_rms_before=0.795 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.618 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.489 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.077 worst_region_rms_after=0.641 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.032 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.632
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:37.174 +37:58:34.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 800 stars ###
'wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky745435.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.795 -> 0.489 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 726 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 687 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 687 pairs (726 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=687 robust_rms=13.277 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.380 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=18.762 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=687 robust_rms=0.490 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.650 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.593 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=687 robust_rms_before=0.479 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.479 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.490 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.640 worst_region_rms_after=0.650 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.608 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.593
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.650 vs 0.640 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 687 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 687 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits N_match=687 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.741 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.724 n_q1=235 n_q2=83 n_q3=286 n_q4=83 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.437
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits -region wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bgWW0yZ9o8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=25, bad_region=0, passed=838
Got 838 stars (including 813 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 838 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 761 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 758 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 758 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 762 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 757 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 757 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 757 stars left (next iteration limit 833)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=757 robust_rms=7.706 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.070 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=8.059 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=757 robust_rms=0.507 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.742 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.683 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=757 robust_rms_before=0.766 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.557 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.507 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.895 worst_region_rms_after=0.742 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.895 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.683
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:37.755 +37:58:42.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 838 stars ###
'wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky745444.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.766 -> 0.507 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 757 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 706 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 706 pairs (757 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=706 robust_rms=7.486 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.511 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=7.610 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=706 robust_rms=0.491 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.686 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.618 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=706 robust_rms_before=0.490 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.490 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.491 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.718 worst_region_rms_after=0.686 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.614 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.618
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:37.758 +37:58:41.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 838 stars ###
'wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky747531.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.490 -> 0.491 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits N_match=706 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.722 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.584 n_q1=245 n_q2=64 n_q3=312 n_q4=85 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.368
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits -region wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits sigma_overall=0.500 worst_q_ratio=1.201
ref2=And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits sigma_overall=0.493 worst_q_ratio=1.085
new1=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits sigma_overall=0.516 worst_q_ratio=1.437
new2=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits sigma_overall=0.528 worst_q_ratio=1.368
reference average sigma_overall=0.4965 worst_q_ratio=1.143
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 83 -> 64, 22.892% > 20%; fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits vs fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287_astrometric_residuals.png (4816 matched stars from wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342_astrometric_residuals.png (4816 matched stars from wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413_astrometric_residuals.png (687 matched stars from wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414_astrometric_residuals.png (706 matched stars from wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field And-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field And-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:23.432 +37:58:14.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:37.174 +37:58:34.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:05:23.432 +37:58:14.56
Second-epoch image center 01:05:37.174 +37:58:34.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0455 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:37.758 +37:58:41.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:05:23.432 +37:58:14.56
Second-epoch image center 01:05:37.758 +37:58:41.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0477 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:05:37.174 +37:58:34.38
Second-epoch second image center 01:05:37.758 +37:58:41.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00285 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uJNLatj8bS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NXUdvrzdru
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits &> /tmp/tmp.beOdvU7DET
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uqXNNPmt8Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits and wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits and wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits and wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits) and catalog (wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 84472 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.6836 to 26.9535 deg, Dec +32.3327 to +43.2354 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.6836 to 26.9535 deg, Dec 32.3327 to 43.2354 deg
Loaded 11816 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8055 out of 9353 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9353 out of 84472 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.482500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.482500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 84472 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.6836 to 26.9535 deg, Dec +32.3327 to +43.2354 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.6836 to 26.9535 deg, Dec 32.3327 to 43.2354 deg
Loaded 11816 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8055 out of 9353 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9353 out of 84472 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 89256 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.6802 to 26.9759 deg, Dec +32.3714 to +43.2800 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.6802 to 26.9759 deg, Dec 32.3714 to 43.2800 deg
Loaded 11855 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7960 out of 9443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9443 out of 89256 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 188 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
2.1 pix And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
2.4 pix fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
2.4 pix fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
15.6 mag. And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
12.4 mag. fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
12.3 mag. fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.3 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uJNLatj8bS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=6039, bad_region=0, passed=84441
Got 84441 stars (including 78298 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84441 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5280)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.588 n_q1=1084 n_q2=1027 n_q3=1379 n_q4=1310 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -region wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NXUdvrzdru (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits' -> 'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=52, blended=6841, bad_region=1, passed=89204
Got 89204 stars (including 82220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 89204 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89204 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89204 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89204 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=1073 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1310 n_q4=1327 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits -region wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.beOdvU7DET (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=130, bad_region=32, passed=7424
Got 7424 stars (including 7249 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7424 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4712 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4678 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4678 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4714 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4680 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4680 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 4680 stars left (next iteration limit 5145)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4680 robust_rms=11.186 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.307 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.307 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4680 robust_rms=0.834 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.060 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.060 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4680 robust_rms=0.724 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.945 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.911 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4680 robust_rms_before=0.817 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.782 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.724 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.009 worst_region_rms_after=0.945 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.119 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.911
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 1.009 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits worst_region_rms_kept=1.009 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.782 arcsec matched=4680
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits N_match=4680 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.723 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.678 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.920 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.673 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.790 n_q1=1773 n_q2=743 n_q3=1578 n_q4=586 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.273
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits -region wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.uqXNNPmt8Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=85, bad_region=34, passed=7391
Got 7391 stars (including 7258 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7391 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4718 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4690 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4690 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4720 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4690 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4690 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 4690 stars left (next iteration limit 5159)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4690 robust_rms=7.962 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.102 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.404 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4690 robust_rms=0.842 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.074 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.074 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4690 robust_rms=0.719 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.923 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.898 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4690 robust_rms_before=0.831 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.754 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.719 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.021 worst_region_rms_after=0.923 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.128 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.898
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 1.021 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits worst_region_rms_kept=1.021 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.754 arcsec matched=4690
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits N_match=4690 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.703 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.668 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.947 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.655 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.770 n_q1=1728 n_q2=602 n_q3=1788 n_q4=572 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.346
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits -region wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_064807_TTUQ1b1x1_703396_Dzxcx7Tt/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field And-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:19:32.34 +34:44:06.0: 11.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:19:32.34 +34:44:06.0: 10.99 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.01 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:32.34 +34:44:06.0: ref_mag=11.01 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1453 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 00:53:33.10 +38:49:43.1: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:45:40.76 +39:33:30.3: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:35:24.55 +34:34:38.9: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:39:38.69 +33:53:52.6: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 00:53:33.10 +38:49:43.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:45:40.76 +39:33:30.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:40:29.52 +34:08:24.6: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:39:38.32 +33:49:32.7: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:40:00.71 +34:00:08.7: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:35:24.55 +34:34:38.9: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:39:38.69 +33:53:52.6: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:35:24.55 +34:34:38.9: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0460 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:39:38.69 +33:53:52.6: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0124 delta=1.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:36:33.66 +34:47:51.4: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:40:29.52 +34:08:24.6: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:40:29.52 +34:08:24.6: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5606 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:38:01.26 +34:19:25.8: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:35:35.17 +34:05:14.4: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:39:38.32 +33:49:32.7: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:40:00.71 +34:00:08.7: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:39:38.32 +33:49:32.7: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6732 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:40:00.71 +34:00:08.7: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8927 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:36:33.66 +34:47:51.4: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:36:33.66 +34:47:51.4: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7950 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:35:35.17 +34:05:14.4: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:35:35.17 +34:05:14.4: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7767 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:38:01.26 +34:19:25.8: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:38:01.26 +34:19:25.8: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7695 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:34:22.34 +33:51:08.9: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:35:43.82 +34:30:39.7: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:34:22.34 +33:51:08.9: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:34:22.34 +33:51:08.9: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7848 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:40:38.66 +33:55:21.1: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:35:43.82 +34:30:39.7: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:35:43.82 +34:30:39.7: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7353 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:35:19.35 +34:22:17.6: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:40:38.66 +33:55:21.1: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:40:38.66 +33:55:21.1: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2293 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:35:19.35 +34:22:17.6: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:35:19.35 +34:22:17.6: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5276 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_05-21-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 01:39:38.91 +34:12:41.7: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-59-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 01:39:38.91 +34:12:41.7: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:39:38.91 +34:12:41.7: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2201 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out09940.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07967.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out10432.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out105741.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out105750.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11808.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105275_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105275_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:39:24.24 +41:23:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105276_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105276_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105279_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105279_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105280_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105280_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105281_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105281_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105283_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105283_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105296_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105296_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105298_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105298_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105299_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105299_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105302_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105302_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105308_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105308_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105309_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105309_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105310_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105310_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105312_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105312_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105315_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105315_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105316_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105316_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105319_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105319_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105326_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105326_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105333_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105333_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105334_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105334_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105336_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105336_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105337_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105337_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105340_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105340_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105351_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105351_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105355_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105355_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105356_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105356_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105361_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105361_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105364_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105364_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105366_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105366_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105373_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105373_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105381_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105381_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105382_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105382_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105385_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105385_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105387_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105387_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105388_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105388_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105389_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105389_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105397_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105397_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105399_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105399_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105405_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105405_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105406_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105406_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105407_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105407_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105408_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105408_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105409_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105409_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105411_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105411_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105412_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105412_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105413_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105413_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105421_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105421_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105425_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105425_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105433_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105433_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105434_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105434_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105435_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105435_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105440_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105440_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105443_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105443_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105445_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105445_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105446_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105446_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105448_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105448_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105449_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105449_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105452_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105452_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105454_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105454_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105455_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105455_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105456_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105456_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105457_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105457_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105459_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105459_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105462_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105462_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105463_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105463_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105470_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105470_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105472_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105472_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105473_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105473_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105474_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105474_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105475_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105475_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105476_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105476_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105482_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105482_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105484_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105484_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105486_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105486_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105491_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105491_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105493_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105493_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105496_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105496_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105501_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105501_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105503_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105503_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105504_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105504_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105505_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105505_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105507_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105507_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105512_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105512_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105515_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105515_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105523_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105523_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105526_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105526_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105530_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105530_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105533_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105533_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105540_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105540_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105547_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105547_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105550_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105550_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105552_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105552_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105553_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105553_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105555_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105555_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105559_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105559_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105561_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105561_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105563_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105563_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105566_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105566_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105567_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105567_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105568_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105568_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105572_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105572_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105577_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105577_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105580_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105580_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105582_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105582_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105583_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105583_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105584_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105584_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105588_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105588_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105592_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105592_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105593_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105593_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105598_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105598_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105602_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105602_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105607_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105607_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105615_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105615_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105619_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105619_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105637_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105637_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105639_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105639_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105648_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105648_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105654_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105654_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105657_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105657_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105659_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105659_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105669_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105669_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105677_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105677_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105680_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105680_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105684_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105684_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105685_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105685_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105688_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105688_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105689_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105689_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105697_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105697_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105702_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105702_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105706_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105706_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105710_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105710_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105711_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105711_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105712_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105712_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105713_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105713_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105714_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105714_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105717_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105717_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105718_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105718_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105720_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105720_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105721_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105721_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105722_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105722_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105723_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105723_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105724_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105724_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105730_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105730_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105731_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105731_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105732_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105732_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105733_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105733_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105741_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
Preparing report for the candidate 105741_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105747_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105747_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105748_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105748_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105750_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
Preparing report for the candidate 105750_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105751_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105751_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105752_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105752_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105758_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 105758_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81541_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 81541_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103635_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 103635_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65828_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 65828_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43143_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 43143_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40290_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 40290_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36988_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 36988_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07967_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
Preparing report for the candidate 07967_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11808_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
Preparing report for the candidate 11808_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09404_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 09404_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18284_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 18284_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:50:06.30 +35:39:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07512_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 07512_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08641_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 08641_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24942_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 24942_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09559_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 09559_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13264_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 13264_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08796_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 08796_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10432_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
Preparing report for the candidate 10432_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07226_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 07226_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11399_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 11399_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60120_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 60120_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79440_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 79440_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30634_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 30634_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08235_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 08235_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28250_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 28250_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10477_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 10477_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27821_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 27821_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34090_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 34090_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70665_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 70665_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:11.09 +41:44:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06095_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 06095_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07737_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 07737_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09940_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 09940_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:39:38.91 +34:12:41.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.28, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.26)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.569 317840881418670848 024.91231556505 +34.21157178846 12.7014 12.0008 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.569#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53503_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 53503_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15324_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 15324_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:09:44.31 +35:37:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39275_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 39275_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:56:45.64 +38:29:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58698_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414
The candidate 58698_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-46-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414 did not pass the final checks
