This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 11.61 13:26:52.86 +45:32:40.4
104.28731 70.27907 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 8" DE CVn
Type: EA/WD+UV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.910 V Y 0.300 V 2452784.05400 0.364139315600 M3V+dA
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:26:52.86 +45:32:40.4: 12.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:26:52.86 +45:32:40.4: 12.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DE CVn,2461324.9894,11.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DE CVn 20261011.4894 11.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 11.74 13:16:58.56 +42:44:55.4
106.18300 73.53905 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" Gaia DR3 1526264667844528128
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.490 G 12.520 G G
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:16:58.56 +42:44:55.4: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:16:58.56 +42:44:55.4: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1526264667844528128,2461324.9894,11.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1526264667844528128 20261011.4894 11.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 12.02 12:29:55.67 +49:17:05.4
132.10784 67.45842 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:29:55.67 +49:17:05.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.596+/-0.030 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:29:55.67 +49:17:05.4: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:29:55.67 +49:17:05.4: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9894,12.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4894 12.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 12.27 12:36:11.17 +50:58:40.3
128.83464 65.97523 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:36:11.17 +50:58:40.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F7 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.329+/-0.033 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:36:11.17 +50:58:40.3: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:36:11.17 +50:58:40.3: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9894,12.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4894 12.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 12.13 12:29:52.46 +50:24:40.1
131.51758 66.35612 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" Gaia DR3 1544675027979702528
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.110 G 13.130 G G
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:29:52.46 +50:24:40.1: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:29:52.46 +50:24:40.1: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1544675027979702528,2461324.9894,12.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1544675027979702528 20261011.4894 12.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 12.04 12:30:17.73 +50:09:29.9
131.48414 66.61741 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J187.5743+50.1581 | 12:30:14.41 +50:09:48.1 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: F5 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.284+/-0.032 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:30:17.73 +50:09:29.9: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:30:17.73 +50:09:29.9: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J187.5743+50.1581,2461324.9894,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J187.5743+50.1581 20261011.4894 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 12.21 12:36:50.84 +50:49:03.8
128.63665 66.14861 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:36:50.84 +50:49:03.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F2 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.347+/-0.032 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:36:50.84 +50:49:03.8: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:36:50.84 +50:49:03.8: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9894,12.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4894 12.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 12.11 13:21:26.47 +48:34:44.1
109.73425 67.77330 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:21:26.47 +48:34:44.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G7 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.562+/-0.032 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:21:26.47 +48:34:44.1: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:21:26.47 +48:34:44.1: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9894,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4894 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 12.03 12:28:21.92 +48:52:27.6
133.00754 67.80007 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:28:21.92 +48:52:27.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: K1 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.577+/-0.027 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:28:21.92 +48:52:27.6: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:28:21.92 +48:52:27.6: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9894,12.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4894 12.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 12.01 12:29:32.39 +50:01:25.3
131.85495 66.72346 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:29:32.39 +50:01:25.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: K1 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.568+/-0.031 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:29:32.39 +50:01:25.3: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:29:32.39 +50:01:25.3: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9894,12.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4894 12.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 11.98 12:25:20.43 +50:49:59.6
133.00709 65.78145 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:25:20.43 +50:49:59.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.375+/-0.030 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:25:20.43 +50:49:59.6: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:25:20.43 +50:49:59.6: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9894,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4894 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 12.07 12:26:31.95 +49:45:41.6
133.20439 66.86701 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:26:31.95 +49:45:41.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F7 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.267+/-0.030 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:26:31.95 +49:45:41.6: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:26:31.95 +49:45:41.6: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9894,12.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4894 12.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 12.07 12:31:58.99 +49:03:48.1
131.36673 67.74505 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:31:58.99 +49:03:48.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F9 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.403+/-0.032 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:31:58.99 +49:03:48.1: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:31:58.99 +49:03:48.1: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9894,12.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4894 12.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 11.99 12:27:09.32 +50:58:44.1
132.24630 65.70793 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:27:09.32 +50:58:44.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.305+/-0.034 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:27:09.32 +50:58:44.1: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:27:09.32 +50:58:44.1: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9894,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4894 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 12.01 12:32:33.42 +50:25:43.5
130.46270 66.42252 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:32:33.42 +50:25:43.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G3 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.349+/-0.030 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:32:33.42 +50:25:43.5: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:32:33.42 +50:25:43.5: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9894,12.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4894 12.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 11.98 12:27:47.30 +50:23:06.8
132.33981 66.30883 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:27:47.30 +50:23:06.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.478+/-0.029 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:27:47.30 +50:23:06.8: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:27:47.30 +50:23:06.8: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9894,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4894 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 12.01 12:37:19.97 +50:35:09.1
128.52718 66.38888 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:37:19.97 +50:35:09.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.392+/-0.042 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:37:19.97 +50:35:09.1: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:37:19.97 +50:35:09.1: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9894,12.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4894 12.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 11.79 13:30:11.20 +46:40:13.0
104.12069 69.01727 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:30:11.20 +46:40:13.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:30:11.20 +46:40:13.0: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:30:11.20 +46:40:13.0: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9894,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4894 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 11.92 12:36:05.03 +50:30:30.9
129.04555 66.43702 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:36:05.03 +50:30:30.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.412+/-0.025 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:36:05.03 +50:30:30.9: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:36:05.03 +50:30:30.9: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9894,11.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4894 11.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 11.76 12:27:48.21 +50:16:50.5
132.39352 66.41114 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1544590228146068480 | 12:27:48.19 +50:16:51.0 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: G8 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.416+/-0.028 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:27:48.21 +50:16:50.5: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:27:48.21 +50:16:50.5: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1544590228146068480,2461324.9894,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1544590228146068480 20261011.4894 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 11.72 12:35:41.76 +50:20:47.6
129.26029 66.58783 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1568455398607381120 | 12:35:41.77 +50:20:48.0 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.752+/-0.023 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:35:41.76 +50:20:47.6: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:35:41.76 +50:20:47.6: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1568455398607381120,2461324.9894,11.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1568455398607381120 20261011.4894 11.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 11.78 12:34:10.24 +50:29:01.4
129.80655 66.41342 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:34:10.24 +50:29:01.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G3 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.323+/-0.027 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:34:10.24 +50:29:01.4: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:34:10.24 +50:29:01.4: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461324.9894,11.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261011.4894 11.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 11.68 13:34:04.94 +47:37:46.7
103.60773 67.86683 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1552342227500405248 | 13:34:04.94 +47:37:46.6 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: G7 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.578+/-0.028 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:34:04.94 +47:37:46.7: 12.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:34:04.94 +47:37:46.7: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1552342227500405248,2461324.9894,11.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1552342227500405248 20261011.4894 11.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 11.69 13:26:27.80 +45:33:12.4
104.49629 70.30049 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 5.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" Gaia DR3 1550217391216975360
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.370 G 12.400 G K
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:26:27.80 +45:33:12.4: 12.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:26:27.80 +45:33:12.4: 12.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1550217391216975360,2461324.9894,11.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1550217391216975360 20261011.4894 11.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 11.72 13:20:57.57 +47:29:29.5
109.02392 68.83159 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 4.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 5066754
Type: EB/RS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.320 V 13.400 V 2457576.78400 0.375131400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:20:57.57 +47:29:29.5: 12.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:20:57.57 +47:29:29.5: 12.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 5066754,2461324.9894,11.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 5066754 20261011.4894 11.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 11.74 12:28:34.95 +50:12:01.2
132.13505 66.51754 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 1544587341928041216 | 12:28:35.01 +50:12:04.2 (Gaia DR3) | 2021A&A...648A..44M | | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE (the VSX policy as of May 2022 seems to be NOT to regard variables from 2021A&A...648A..44M as 'known' for the lack of classification) SpType: K3 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:28:34.95 +50:12:01.2: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:28:34.95 +50:12:01.2: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 1544587341928041216,2461324.9894,11.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 1544587341928041216 20261011.4894 11.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 11.72 12:27:47.28 +48:43:04.1
133.35233 67.92916 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" Gaia DR3 1544107130225711872
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.390 G 12.410 G G
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:27:47.28 +48:43:04.1: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:27:47.28 +48:43:04.1: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1544107130225711872,2461324.9894,11.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1544107130225711872 20261011.4894 11.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 11.68 13:37:25.34 +48:04:27.3
102.81694 67.21844 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1552283407925036288 | 13:37:25.48 +48:04:27.6 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: K4 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.631+/-0.030 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:37:25.34 +48:04:27.3: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:37:25.34 +48:04:27.3: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.4894* 13 37 25.34 +48 04 27.3 11.7 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1552283407925036288,2461324.9894,11.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1552283407925036288 20261011.4894 11.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4894 2461324.9894 11.48 13:27:45.12 +46:33:46.5
105.07041 69.28574 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.5" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1551863153965444352 | 13:27:44.91 +46:33:47.3 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: K3 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:27:45.12 +46:33:46.5: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:27:45.12 +46:33:46.5: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1551863153965444352,2461324.9894,11.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1551863153965444352 20261011.4894 11.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.80899023 12.05.2026 07:24:46.756 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
First image: 2461172.80899023 12.05.2026 07:24:46.756 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Last image: 2461324.98970777 11.10.2026 11:45:00.751 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5334
Objects passed selection criteria: 5300
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3168.75
Average stars matched: 3082.5 (97.2781 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232048 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 11 06:48:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.80899023 12.05.2026 07:24:46.756 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
First image: 2461172.80899023 12.05.2026 07:24:46.756 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Last image: 2461324.98970777 11.10.2026 11:45:00.751 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 90
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.90
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28701
Objects passed selection criteria: 28576
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17515.8
Average stars matched: 16949.8 (96.7686 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 252804 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 11 06:49:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461324.98917635
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:12:00.572 +45:59:41.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:11:52.994 +45:58:42.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:12:00.572 +45:59:41.02
Second-epoch image center 13:11:52.994 +45:58:42.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0273 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Image size: 944.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:11:50.970 +45:59:03.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:12:00.572 +45:59:41.02
Second-epoch image center 13:11:50.970 +45:59:03.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0296 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:11:52.994 +45:58:42.38
Second-epoch second image center 13:11:50.970 +45:59:03.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00839 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gezIwS8l7Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NnQPrDpjVl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tGy4sBbJPu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CVB7yZJPVB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits and wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits and wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits and wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits) and catalog (wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5685 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.0168 to 210.6849 deg, Dec +39.8612 to +51.3577 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.0168 to 210.6849 deg, Dec 39.8612 to 51.3577 deg
Loaded 4189 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2904 out of 3041 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3041 out of 5685 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.813000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.813000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5685 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.0168 to 210.6849 deg, Dec +39.8612 to +51.3577 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.0168 to 210.6849 deg, Dec 39.8612 to 51.3577 deg
Loaded 4189 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2904 out of 3041 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3041 out of 5685 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 5702 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.1897 to 210.6848 deg, Dec +39.8612 to +51.3577 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.1897 to 210.6848 deg, Dec 39.8612 to 51.3577 deg
Loaded 4166 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2907 out of 3042 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3042 out of 5702 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
2.1 pix CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
2.9 pix fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
2.9 pix fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
15.6 mag. CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
12.3 mag. fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
12.0 mag. fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.0 (SNR ) 10.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.gezIwS8l7Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=340, bad_region=0, passed=5685
Got 5685 stars (including 5338 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5685 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5685 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5685 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5685 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4859 stars left (next iteration limit 5344)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=4859 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=1318 n_q2=1186 n_q3=1203 n_q4=1152 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NnQPrDpjVl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=330, bad_region=0, passed=5702
Got 5702 stars (including 5364 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5702 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5337)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits N_match=4852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=1319 n_q2=1183 n_q3=1198 n_q4=1152 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits -region wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tGy4sBbJPu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=27, bad_region=0, passed=683
Got 683 stars (including 656 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 683 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 653 to 708 (Dec 40.8 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 636 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 636 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 609 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 636 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 653 to 708 (Dec 40.8 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 636 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 636 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 653 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 636 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 653 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 636 stars left (next iteration limit 699)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=636 robust_rms=7.549 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.113 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.113 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=636 robust_rms=0.546 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.659 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.659 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=636 robust_rms_before=1.161 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.388 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.546 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.445 worst_region_rms_after=0.659 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.423 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.659
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.445 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.445 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.388 arcsec matched=636
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits N_match=636 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.442 n_q1=178 n_q2=68 n_q3=186 n_q4=204 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits -region wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CVB7yZJPVB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=33, bad_region=0, passed=677
Got 677 stars (including 644 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 677 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 653 to 708 (Dec 40.8 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 629 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 653 to 708 (Dec 40.8 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 629 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 629 stars left (next iteration limit 691)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=629 robust_rms=7.541 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.891 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.891 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=629 robust_rms=0.585 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.713 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.589 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=629 robust_rms_before=1.149 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.430 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.585 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.544 worst_region_rms_after=0.713 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.275 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.589
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.544 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.544 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.430 arcsec matched=629
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits N_match=629 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.517 n_q1=151 n_q2=71 n_q3=203 n_q4=204 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits -region wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits sigma_overall=0.348 worst_q_ratio=1.129
ref2=CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.160
new1=fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits sigma_overall=0.416 worst_q_ratio=1.131
new2=fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits sigma_overall=0.440 worst_q_ratio=1.205
reference average sigma_overall=0.3505 worst_q_ratio=1.1445
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255_astrometric_residuals.png (4859 matched stars from wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (4852 matched stars from wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411_astrometric_residuals.png (636 matched stars from wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412_astrometric_residuals.png (629 matched stars from wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field CVn-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field CVn-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:12:00.572 +45:59:41.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:11:52.994 +45:58:42.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:12:00.572 +45:59:41.02
Second-epoch image center 13:11:52.994 +45:58:42.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0273 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Image size: 944.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:11:50.970 +45:59:03.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:12:00.572 +45:59:41.02
Second-epoch image center 13:11:50.970 +45:59:03.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0296 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:11:52.994 +45:58:42.38
Second-epoch second image center 13:11:50.970 +45:59:03.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00839 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KU32Q8rfNw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yG0EHhwcQc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MBzItmVEdJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YKUO0lBC76
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits and wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits and wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits and wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits) and catalog (wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30928 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.0168 to 210.7315 deg, Dec +39.8612 to +51.3805 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.0168 to 210.7315 deg, Dec 39.8612 to 51.3805 deg
Loaded 4203 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2755 out of 3050 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3050 out of 30928 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.709000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.709000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.90
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30928 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.0168 to 210.7315 deg, Dec +39.8612 to +51.3805 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.0168 to 210.7315 deg, Dec 39.8612 to 51.3805 deg
Loaded 4203 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2755 out of 3050 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3050 out of 30928 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 30863 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.0184 to 210.7334 deg, Dec +39.8612 to +51.3741 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.0184 to 210.7334 deg, Dec 39.8612 to 51.3741 deg
Loaded 4202 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2769 out of 3053 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3053 out of 30863 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 80 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
2.0 pix CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
2.8 pix fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
2.8 pix fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
15.8 mag. CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
12.6 mag. fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
12.6 mag. fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.6 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KU32Q8rfNw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1156, bad_region=19, passed=30910
Got 30910 stars (including 29691 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30910 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=1350 n_q2=1217 n_q3=1160 n_q4=1126 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173
The image catalog is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.yG0EHhwcQc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1148, bad_region=20, passed=30852
Got 30852 stars (including 29635 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30852 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=1350 n_q2=1219 n_q3=1156 n_q4=1128 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits -region wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MBzItmVEdJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=77, bad_region=19, passed=4342
Got 4342 stars (including 4240 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4342 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4006 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3998 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3998 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4005 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3997 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.01"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3997 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.01"
Excluding outliers - 3997 stars left (next iteration limit 4397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3997 robust_rms=7.425 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.664 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.664 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3997 robust_rms=1.063 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.215 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.215 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3997 robust_rms=0.982 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.124 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.942 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3997 robust_rms_before=1.516 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=1.002 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.982 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.120 worst_region_rms_after=1.124 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.640 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.942
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 1.120 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits worst_region_rms_kept=1.120 arcsec robust_rms_kept=1.002 arcsec matched=3997
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits N_match=3997 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.890 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.862 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.068 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.809 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.931 n_q1=978 n_q2=454 n_q3=1289 n_q4=1276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.200
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits -region wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YKUO0lBC76 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=77, bad_region=15, passed=4450
Got 4450 stars (including 4352 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4094 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4087 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.95"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4087 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.95"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4094 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4087 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.00"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4087 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.00"
Excluding outliers - 4087 stars left (next iteration limit 4495)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4087 robust_rms=7.397 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.464 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.464 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4087 robust_rms=1.097 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.210 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.167 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4087 robust_rms=1.003 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.189 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.990 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4087 robust_rms_before=1.487 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=1.006 arcsec robust_rms_after=1.097 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.161 worst_region_rms_after=1.210 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.637 outer_annulus_rms_after=1.167
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 1.161 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits worst_region_rms_kept=1.161 arcsec robust_rms_kept=1.006 arcsec matched=4087
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits N_match=4087 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.922 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.943 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.092 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.828 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.937 n_q1=883 n_q2=486 n_q3=1413 n_q4=1305 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits -region wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-44-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_064607_TTUQ1b1x1_544694_QNGZwtlz/wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field CVn-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:16:58.56 +42:44:55.4: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:36:11.17 +50:58:40.3: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:29:55.67 +49:17:05.4: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:26:52.86 +45:32:40.4: 12.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:29:52.46 +50:24:40.1: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:21:26.47 +48:34:44.1: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:36:50.84 +50:49:03.8: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:30:17.73 +50:09:29.9: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:28:21.92 +48:52:27.6: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:29:32.39 +50:01:25.3: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:26:52.86 +45:32:40.4: 12.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:29:55.67 +49:17:05.4: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:16:58.56 +42:44:55.4: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:36:11.17 +50:58:40.3: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:26:52.86 +45:32:40.4: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6033 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:16:58.56 +42:44:55.4: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7354 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:29:55.67 +49:17:05.4: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0086 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:36:11.17 +50:58:40.3: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2457 delta=1.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:29:52.46 +50:24:40.1: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:30:17.73 +50:09:29.9: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:29:52.46 +50:24:40.1: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1389 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:30:17.73 +50:09:29.9: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0319 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:36:50.84 +50:49:03.8: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:21:26.47 +48:34:44.1: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:36:50.84 +50:49:03.8: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1688 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:21:26.47 +48:34:44.1: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1013 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:28:21.92 +48:52:27.6: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:28:21.92 +48:52:27.6: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0229 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:29:32.39 +50:01:25.3: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:29:32.39 +50:01:25.3: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0228 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:25:20.43 +50:49:59.6: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:26:31.95 +49:45:41.6: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:31:58.99 +49:03:48.1: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:25:20.43 +50:49:59.6: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:25:20.43 +50:49:59.6: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9677 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:26:31.95 +49:45:41.6: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:26:31.95 +49:45:41.6: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0687 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:31:58.99 +49:03:48.1: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:31:58.99 +49:03:48.1: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9968 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:27:09.32 +50:58:44.1: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:27:09.32 +50:58:44.1: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:27:09.32 +50:58:44.1: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9933 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:32:33.42 +50:25:43.5: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:27:47.30 +50:23:06.8: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:37:19.97 +50:35:09.1: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:30:11.20 +46:40:13.0: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:36:05.03 +50:30:30.9: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:32:33.42 +50:25:43.5: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:32:33.42 +50:25:43.5: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0014 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:27:48.21 +50:16:50.5: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:27:47.30 +50:23:06.8: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:27:47.30 +50:23:06.8: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9322 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:37:19.97 +50:35:09.1: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:37:19.97 +50:35:09.1: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9479 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:36:05.03 +50:30:30.9: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:30:11.20 +46:40:13.0: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:36:05.03 +50:30:30.9: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9193 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:30:11.20 +46:40:13.0: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7759 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:27:48.21 +50:16:50.5: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:27:48.21 +50:16:50.5: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7267 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:35:41.76 +50:20:47.6: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:35:41.76 +50:20:47.6: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:35:41.76 +50:20:47.6: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7184 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:34:10.24 +50:29:01.4: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:34:04.94 +47:37:46.7: 12.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:34:10.24 +50:29:01.4: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:34:10.24 +50:29:01.4: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7813 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:34:04.94 +47:37:46.7: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:34:04.94 +47:37:46.7: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6793 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:26:27.80 +45:33:12.4: 12.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:26:27.80 +45:33:12.4: 12.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:26:27.80 +45:33:12.4: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7051 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:20:57.57 +47:29:29.5: 12.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:20:57.57 +47:29:29.5: 12.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:20:57.57 +47:29:29.5: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7242 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:28:34.95 +50:12:01.2: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 12:27:47.28 +48:43:04.1: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:37:25.34 +48:04:27.3: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:28:34.95 +50:12:01.2: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:28:34.95 +50:12:01.2: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7325 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:17:59.68 +43:29:42.0: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 12:27:47.28 +48:43:04.1: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:27:47.28 +48:43:04.1: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7273 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:37:25.34 +48:04:27.3: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:37:25.34 +48:04:27.3: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5850 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:17:59.68 +43:29:42.0: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:59.68 +43:29:42.0: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5041 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:27:45.12 +46:33:46.5: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:27:45.12 +46:33:46.5: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:27:45.12 +46:33:46.5: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4412 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out00656.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01043.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01064.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01551.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02291.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02495.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02502.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02540.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02577.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02623.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02883.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02962.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03161.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03369.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03766.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04422.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out06119.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out06869.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07292.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07759.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08060.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08590.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out10239.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11418.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13436.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out14004.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out17139.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out17140.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out25558.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 48s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 16s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52038_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52038_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52039_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52039_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52043_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52043_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52045_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52045_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52047_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52047_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52049_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52049_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52050_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52050_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52054_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52054_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52064_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52064_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52066_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52066_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52068_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52068_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52073_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52073_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52075_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52075_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52078_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52078_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52083_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52083_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:22:09.11 +43:54:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52084_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52084_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52085_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52085_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52089_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52089_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52091_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52091_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52092_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52092_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52096_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52096_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52099_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52099_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52103_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52103_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52104_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52104_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52105_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52105_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52107_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52107_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52108_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52108_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52109_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52109_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52110_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52110_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52113_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52113_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52120_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52120_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52125_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52125_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52126_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52126_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52130_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52130_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52136_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52136_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52137_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52137_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52139_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52139_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52141_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52141_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52143_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52143_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52146_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52146_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52147_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52147_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52153_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52153_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52158_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52158_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52162_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52162_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52169_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 52169_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17139_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 17139_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25558_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 25558_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06119_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 06119_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01043_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 01043_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07960_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 07960_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02577_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 02577_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03369_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 03369_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01551_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 01551_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08060_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 08060_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07292_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 07292_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03766_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 03766_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23569_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 23569_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01064_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 01064_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04422_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 04422_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06869_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 06869_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00656_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 00656_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02623_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 02623_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02540_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 02540_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02291_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 02291_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03503_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 03503_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13436_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 13436_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02495_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 02495_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02883_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 02883_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02962_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 02962_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02502_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 02502_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10239_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 10239_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17140_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 17140_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11418_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 11418_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03161_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 03161_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07759_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 07759_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08590_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 08590_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27787_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 27787_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08471_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 08471_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14004_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 14004_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18065_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412
The candidate 18065_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-45-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:05:01.26 +45:30:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 3s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 67s
Prepared the HTML report for the field CVn-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
12:27:09.32 +50:58:44.1
12:36:11.17 +50:58:40.3
12:25:20.43 +50:49:59.6
12:36:50.84 +50:49:03.8
12:37:19.97 +50:35:09.1
12:36:05.03 +50:30:30.9
12:34:10.24 +50:29:01.4
12:27:47.30 +50:23:06.8
12:29:52.46 +50:24:40.1
12:32:33.42 +50:25:43.5
12:27:48.21 +50:16:50.5
12:35:41.76 +50:20:47.6
12:28:34.95 +50:12:01.2
12:30:17.73 +50:09:29.9
12:29:32.39 +50:01:25.3
12:26:31.95 +49:45:41.6
12:29:55.67 +49:17:05.4
12:31:58.99 +49:03:48.1
12:28:21.92 +48:52:27.6
12:27:47.28 +48:43:04.1
13:21:26.47 +48:34:44.1
13:37:25.34 +48:04:27.3
13:34:04.94 +47:37:46.7
13:20:57.57 +47:29:29.5
13:30:11.20 +46:40:13.0
13:27:45.12 +46:33:46.5
13:26:52.86 +45:32:40.4
13:26:27.80 +45:33:12.4
13:16:58.56 +42:44:55.4
########### Completed CVn-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
13:26:52.86 +45:32:40.4
13:16:58.56 +42:44:55.4
12:29:55.67 +49:17:05.4
12:36:11.17 +50:58:40.3
12:29:52.46 +50:24:40.1
12:30:17.73 +50:09:29.9
12:36:50.84 +50:49:03.8
13:21:26.47 +48:34:44.1
12:28:21.92 +48:52:27.6
12:29:32.39 +50:01:25.3
12:25:20.43 +50:49:59.6
12:26:31.95 +49:45:41.6
12:31:58.99 +49:03:48.1
12:27:09.32 +50:58:44.1
12:32:33.42 +50:25:43.5
12:27:47.30 +50:23:06.8
12:37:19.97 +50:35:09.1
13:30:11.20 +46:40:13.0
12:36:05.03 +50:30:30.9
12:27:48.21 +50:16:50.5
12:35:41.76 +50:20:47.6
12:34:10.24 +50:29:01.4
13:34:04.94 +47:37:46.7
13:26:27.80 +45:33:12.4
13:20:57.57 +47:29:29.5
12:28:34.95 +50:12:01.2
12:27:47.28 +48:43:04.1
13:37:25.34 +48:04:27.3
13:27:45.12 +46:33:46.5
###################################################################################
13:26:52.86 +45:32:40.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:16:58.56 +42:44:55.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:29:55.67 +49:17:05.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:36:11.17 +50:58:40.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:29:52.46 +50:24:40.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:30:17.73 +50:09:29.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:36:50.84 +50:49:03.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:21:26.47 +48:34:44.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:28:21.92 +48:52:27.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:29:32.39 +50:01:25.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:25:20.43 +50:49:59.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:26:31.95 +49:45:41.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:31:58.99 +49:03:48.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:27:09.32 +50:58:44.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:32:33.42 +50:25:43.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:27:47.30 +50:23:06.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:37:19.97 +50:35:09.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:30:11.20 +46:40:13.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:36:05.03 +50:30:30.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:27:48.21 +50:16:50.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:35:41.76 +50:20:47.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:34:10.24 +50:29:01.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:34:04.94 +47:37:46.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:26:27.80 +45:33:12.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:20:57.57 +47:29:29.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:28:34.95 +50:12:01.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:27:47.28 +48:43:04.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:37:25.34 +48:04:27.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:27:45.12 +46:33:46.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
12:25:20.43 +50:49:59.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:26:31.95 +49:45:41.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:27:09.32 +50:58:44.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:27:47.28 +48:43:04.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:27:47.30 +50:23:06.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:27:48.21 +50:16:50.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:28:21.92 +48:52:27.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:28:34.95 +50:12:01.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:29:32.39 +50:01:25.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:29:52.46 +50:24:40.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:29:55.67 +49:17:05.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:30:17.73 +50:09:29.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:31:58.99 +49:03:48.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:32:33.42 +50:25:43.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:34:10.24 +50:29:01.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:35:41.76 +50:20:47.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:36:05.03 +50:30:30.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:36:11.17 +50:58:40.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:36:50.84 +50:49:03.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:37:19.97 +50:35:09.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:16:58.56 +42:44:55.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:20:57.57 +47:29:29.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:21:26.47 +48:34:44.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:26:27.80 +45:33:12.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:26:52.86 +45:32:40.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:27:45.12 +46:33:46.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:30:11.20 +46:40:13.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:34:04.94 +47:37:46.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:37:25.34 +48:04:27.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
12:25:20.43 +50:49:59.6 -- not a known variable star
12:26:31.95 +49:45:41.6 -- not a known variable star
12:27:09.32 +50:58:44.1 -- not a known variable star
12:27:47.28 +48:43:04.1 -- a known variable star
12:27:47.30 +50:23:06.8 -- not a known variable star
12:27:48.21 +50:16:50.5 -- not a known variable star
12:28:21.92 +48:52:27.6 -- not a known variable star
12:28:34.95 +50:12:01.2 -- not a known variable star
12:29:32.39 +50:01:25.3 -- not a known variable star
12:29:52.46 +50:24:40.1 -- a known variable star
12:29:55.67 +49:17:05.4 -- not a known variable star
12:30:17.73 +50:09:29.9 -- not a known variable star
12:31:58.99 +49:03:48.1 -- not a known variable star
12:32:33.42 +50:25:43.5 -- not a known variable star
12:34:10.24 +50:29:01.4 -- not a known variable star
12:35:41.76 +50:20:47.6 -- not a known variable star
12:36:05.03 +50:30:30.9 -- not a known variable star
12:36:11.17 +50:58:40.3 -- not a known variable star
12:36:50.84 +50:49:03.8 -- not a known variable star
12:37:19.97 +50:35:09.1 -- not a known variable star
13:16:58.56 +42:44:55.4 -- a known variable star
13:20:57.57 +47:29:29.5 -- a known variable star
13:21:26.47 +48:34:44.1 -- not a known variable star
13:26:27.80 +45:33:12.4 -- a known variable star
13:26:52.86 +45:32:40.4 -- a known variable star
13:27:45.12 +46:33:46.5 -- not a known variable star
13:30:11.20 +46:40:13.0 -- not a known variable star
13:34:04.94 +47:37:46.7 -- not a known variable star
13:37:25.34 +48:04:27.3 -- not a known variable star
Found 23 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
29 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
12:25:20.43 +50:49:59.6
12:26:31.95 +49:45:41.6
12:27:09.32 +50:58:44.1
12:27:47.28 +48:43:04.1
12:27:47.30 +50:23:06.8
12:27:48.21 +50:16:50.5
12:28:21.92 +48:52:27.6
12:28:34.95 +50:12:01.2
12:29:32.39 +50:01:25.3
12:29:52.46 +50:24:40.1
12:29:55.67 +49:17:05.4
12:30:17.73 +50:09:29.9
12:31:58.99 +49:03:48.1
12:32:33.42 +50:25:43.5
12:34:10.24 +50:29:01.4
12:35:41.76 +50:20:47.6
12:36:05.03 +50:30:30.9
12:36:11.17 +50:58:40.3
12:36:50.84 +50:49:03.8
12:37:19.97 +50:35:09.1
13:16:58.56 +42:44:55.4
13:20:57.57 +47:29:29.5
13:21:26.47 +48:34:44.1
13:26:27.80 +45:33:12.4
13:26:52.86 +45:32:40.4
13:27:45.12 +46:33:46.5
13:30:11.20 +46:40:13.0
13:34:04.94 +47:37:46.7
13:37:25.34 +48:04:27.3
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461324.98917635 -observatory V36
14:37:47.27 -18:22:17.3 Mercury (0.0mag)
14:07:14.71 -20:55:34.0 Venus (-4.5mag)
08:40:08.92 +19:36:07.9 Mars (1.0mag)
09:34:25.51 +15:05:04.1 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:42:24.95 +01:36:44.3 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:12:04.23 +20:57:56.4 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:20.12 -00:25:40.6 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:10.77 -23:43:30.2 Pluto (14.5mag)
13:39:21.14 -15:09:09.1 Moon (-8.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 11 06:48 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461324.98917635:
09:34:19.76 +15:05:36.3 Io (6.1mag)
09:34:35.95 +15:04:07.0 Europa (6.2mag)
09:34:40.87 +15:03:39.9 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:34:02.01 +15:07:11.8 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:34:10.50 +15:25:32.8 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:34:24.50 +15:05:10.0 Thebe (16.4mag)
09:33:00.48 +15:26:44.7 Elara (17.5mag)
09:36:51.38 +14:27:54.3 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:33:01.28 +15:32:10.1 Carme (18.8mag)
00:42:11.59 +01:36:55.8 Titan (8.2mag)
00:42:27.69 +01:36:40.5 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:41:54.46 +01:33:57.4 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:42:09.41 +01:36:34.7 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:40:44.36 +01:24:24.9 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 11 06:48 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461324.98917635:
02:48:48.44 +21:19:57.9 JWST
17:30:00.12 +37:03:00.2 Chandra
14:39:07.15 -61:02:13.0 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 11 06:48 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461324.98917635 -observatory V36
03:46:06.48 +20:11:56.6 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:24:48.43 -33:29:40.0 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:39:51.28 -72:24:32.0 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:15:51.20 +34:39:12.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
07:30:13.46 +25:27:26.5 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:01:59.44 +35:40:44.1 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:26:47.19 +41:31:16.1 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:46:12.17 -13:35:28.6 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:17:16.95 +15:59:10.8 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:51:05.19 -02:43:43.9 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:43:02.08 +65:10:43.7 15.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:36:00.69 +43:16:27.4 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:45:45.41 +14:16:16.0 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:29:20.97 -21:13:35.1 12.9mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
00:26:46.20 +18:58:58.0 17.6mag 2P/Encke
22:58:23.08 -31:40:27.0 14.5mag 10P/Tempel
02:10:54.95 +38:43:16.2 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:11:18.12 -08:10:15.9 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:22:21.46 -08:52:26.6 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:35:55.18 +16:00:02.4 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
02:59:57.68 +14:20:11.0 17.6mag 88P/Howell
07:39:19.01 +40:16:41.1 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
09:02:53.04 +14:06:41.3 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:41:13.65 +13:14:17.2 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
14:06:57.86 -32:14:40.5 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:50:54.38 +19:18:16.0 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
21:38:39.13 +03:31:12.4 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:18:44.46 +01:37:41.9 14.3mag 169P/NEAT
03:29:16.45 +04:35:09.5 14.8mag 220P/McNaught
06:03:37.64 +45:14:30.7 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
07:27:46.26 +25:36:56.1 17.9mag 266P/Christensen
09:56:20.49 +31:37:15.2 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Oct 11 06:48 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70 ASASSN-26fk 2026-10-5.53 -3.9
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 11 06:48 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 11 06:48 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
22:00:29.980 +18:33:24.69 AT 2026acyi 2026-08-31.60 21.38
01:44:56.733 +00:38:32.49 AT 2026acyh 2026-09-21.88 22.21
01:45:25.068 +03:43:05.31 AT 2026acyg 2026-09-12.91 22.32
23:02:48.800 +03:40:01.33 AT 2026acyf 2026-08-31.80 21.75
05:44:27.090 +33:39:00.48 AT 2026acye 2026-09-25.43 18.62
06:12:59.365 -58:12:49.41 AT 2026acyd 2026-09-25.74 18.37
06:44:13.801 +10:23:30.61 AT 2026acyc 2026-09-24.45 17.58
21:50:55.698 -02:51:50.17 SN 2026acyb 2026-09-20.25 19.4497
17:12:55.487 +34:28:22.84 SN 2026acya 2026-09-22.17 19.6988
18:28:46.287 +43:53:39.30 AT 2026acxz 2026-09-22.18 19.7418
18:50:25.837 +51:48:48.31 AT 2026acxy 2026-09-26.14 19.507
17:29:04.550 +70:58:39.69 AT 2026acxx 2026-09-18.17 19.9857
18:36:38.362 +53:14:52.16 AT 2026acxw 2026-09-22.17 19.6863
03:16:13.837 +33:07:04.16 AT 2026acxv 2026-09-24.50 20.55
05:52:14.054 +15:53:08.19 AT 2026acxu 2026-09-22.43 20.8781
08:02:21.458 +24:05:52.06 AT 2026acxt 2026-09-24.51 19.9945
08:26:53.421 +00:01:31.92 AT 2026acxs 2026-09-24.52 18.9046
08:04:09.422 +26:03:07.21 AT 2026acxr 2026-09-16.52 20.3455
09:49:29.452 +22:28:47.85 AT 2026acxq 2026-09-24.52 18.9887
10:39:38.343 +25:39:08.54 AT 2026acxp 2026-09-24.53 18.7327
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 11 06:48 tns_transients_list.txt
