This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4264 2461324.9264 13.07 01:14:12.07 +24:14:39.3
129.55088 -38.33477 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.516 Amherstia -0 -0 0 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:14:12.07 +24:14:39.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:14:12.07 +24:14:39.3: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.9264,13.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.4264 13.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4264 2461324.9264 13.67 00:43:29.00 +24:16:43.9
120.61360 -38.55708 galactic And Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.778 Theobalda -1 -0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:43:29.00 +24:16:43.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:43:29.00 +24:16:43.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.4264* 00 43 29.00 +24 16 43.9 13.7 U And 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.9264,13.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.4264 13.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4264 2461324.9264 14.25 00:56:20.28 +26:59:15.6
124.27906 -35.87126 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.989 Schwassmannia -0 -1 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:56:20.28 +26:59:15.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:56:20.28 +26:59:15.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.9264,14.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.4264 14.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4264 2461324.9264 14.34 01:22:57.06 +23:15:48.3
132.26186 -39.03676 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1321 Majuba 0 0 1 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:22:57.06 +23:15:48.3: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:22:57.06 +23:15:48.3: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.9264,14.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.4264 14.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4264 2461324.9264 14.23 00:46:36.76 +18:05:03.2
121.31652 -44.77239 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28017 1997 YV13 0 -1 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:46:36.76 +18:05:03.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:46:36.76 +18:05:03.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.9264,14.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.4264 14.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.87728270 21.07.2026 09:03:07.225 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
First image: 2461242.87728270 21.07.2026 09:03:07.225 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Last image: 2461324.92667545 11.10.2026 10:14:14.759 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 22
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8830
Objects passed selection criteria: 8823
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8170.25
Average stars matched: 7813.75 (95.6366 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235208 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 11 05:16:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.87728270 21.07.2026 09:03:07.225 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
First image: 2461242.87728270 21.07.2026 09:03:07.225 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Last image: 2461324.92667545 11.10.2026 10:14:14.759 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 58
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.01
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 44766
Objects passed selection criteria: 44654
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 41947.5
Average stars matched: 40227.2 (95.899 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 264696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 11 05:17:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461324.92606981
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:55:23.039 +22:00:09.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:55:23.802 +21:59:55.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:55:23.039 +22:00:09.24
Second-epoch image center 00:55:23.802 +21:59:55.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0049 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:55:25.059 +21:59:15.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:55:23.039 +22:00:09.24
Second-epoch image center 00:55:25.059 +21:59:15.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0168 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:55:23.802 +21:59:55.21
Second-epoch second image center 00:55:25.059 +21:59:15.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01202 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bb0mEjrTBD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits &> /tmp/tmp.S2RF0bsFvX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O8OIb6frZD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xDNnZu5poz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits and wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits and wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits and wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits) and catalog (wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8239 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0309 to 22.5164 deg, Dec +16.5297 to +27.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0309 to 22.5164 deg, Dec 16.5297 to 27.2697 deg
Loaded 6139 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4800 out of 4969 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4969 out of 8239 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.638700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.638700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8239 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0309 to 22.5164 deg, Dec +16.5297 to +27.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0309 to 22.5164 deg, Dec 16.5297 to 27.2697 deg
Loaded 6139 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4800 out of 4969 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4969 out of 8239 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 8234 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0488 to 22.5362 deg, Dec +16.5295 to +27.2628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0488 to 22.5362 deg, Dec 16.5295 to 27.2628 deg
Loaded 6138 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4773 out of 4949 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4949 out of 8234 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
2.3 pix And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
2.9 pix fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
2.9 pix fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
15.4 mag. And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
15.2 mag. fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
15.2 mag. fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Bb0mEjrTBD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits' -> 'wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=488, bad_region=0, passed=8239
Got 8239 stars (including 7744 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8239 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5339)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.428 n_q1=1200 n_q2=1133 n_q3=1310 n_q4=1211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits -region wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.S2RF0bsFvX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits' -> 'wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=491, bad_region=0, passed=8234
Got 8234 stars (including 7734 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8234 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8234 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8234 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8234 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5339)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.435 n_q1=1201 n_q2=1138 n_q3=1308 n_q4=1207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits -region wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.O8OIb6frZD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=341, bad_region=0, passed=7944
Got 7944 stars (including 7598 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7944 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=12.020 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.600 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.600 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=0.388 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.933 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.933 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=0.285 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.429 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.429 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4858 robust_rms_before=1.042 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.262 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.285 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.443 worst_region_rms_after=0.429 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.384 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.429
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.443 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.443 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.262 arcsec matched=4858
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1128 n_q2=1469 n_q3=985 n_q4=1276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits -region wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xDNnZu5poz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=403, bad_region=0, passed=8433
Got 8433 stars (including 8026 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8433 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5337)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=12.361 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.537 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.537 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.810 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.810 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=0.263 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.396 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.396 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4852 robust_rms_before=1.027 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.258 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.263 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.435 worst_region_rms_after=0.396 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.374 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.396
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.435 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.435 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.258 arcsec matched=4852
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits N_match=4852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=1120 n_q2=1400 n_q3=1110 n_q4=1222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits -region wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits sigma_overall=0.410 worst_q_ratio=1.106
ref2=And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits sigma_overall=0.423 worst_q_ratio=1.098
new1=fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits sigma_overall=0.266 worst_q_ratio=1.144
new2=fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits sigma_overall=0.268 worst_q_ratio=1.162
reference average sigma_overall=0.4165 worst_q_ratio=1.102
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931_astrometric_residuals.png (4854 matched stars from wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932_astrometric_residuals.png (4854 matched stars from wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321_astrometric_residuals.png (4858 matched stars from wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322_astrometric_residuals.png (4852 matched stars from wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field And-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:23:54.26 +26:56:29.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:51:36.93 +21:20:06.0: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:40:17.11 +24:02:46.7: 10.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:48:01.80 +21:28:32.8: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:49:20.14 +23:25:16.2: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:51:48.88 +20:39:50.9: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:54:56.34 +22:52:19.0: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:00:50.90 +23:21:56.7: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:50:15.35 +22:30:21.9: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:52:59.71 +22:24:07.6: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:23:54.26 +26:56:29.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:54.26 +26:56:29.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:51:36.93 +21:20:06.0: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:51:48.88 +20:39:50.9: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:40:17.11 +24:02:46.7: 10.68 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:54:56.34 +22:52:19.0: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:48:01.80 +21:28:32.8: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:00:50.90 +23:21:56.7: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.69 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:51:36.93 +21:20:06.0: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1217 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:51:48.88 +20:39:50.9: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1836 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:49:20.14 +23:25:16.2: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:40:17.11 +24:02:46.7: ref_mag=10.69 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1219 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:54:56.34 +22:52:19.0: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1953 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:48:01.80 +21:28:32.8: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1818 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:00:50.90 +23:21:56.7: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1523 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:49:20.14 +23:25:16.2: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1497 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:50:15.35 +22:30:21.9: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:52:59.71 +22:24:07.6: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:50:15.35 +22:30:21.9: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2140 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:52:59.71 +22:24:07.6: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2017 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:51:20.86 +22:05:43.0: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:49:38.88 +21:27:00.4: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:55:38.70 +21:36:09.9: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:50:49.25 +23:51:42.2: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:54:59.48 +23:55:10.2: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:50:42.68 +20:09:00.9: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:51:20.86 +22:05:43.0: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:51:20.86 +22:05:43.0: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2311 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:49:38.88 +21:27:00.4: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:49:38.88 +21:27:00.4: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2287 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:50:42.68 +20:09:00.9: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:55:38.70 +21:36:09.9: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:50:49.25 +23:51:42.2: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:50:49.25 +23:51:42.2: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2374 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:54:59.48 +23:55:10.2: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:50:42.68 +20:09:00.9: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2566 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:55:38.70 +21:36:09.9: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2163 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:54:59.48 +23:55:10.2: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3040 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20341_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 20341_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:43:18.76 +27:11:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20400_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 20400_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20437_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 20437_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20547_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 20547_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:48:20.92 +27:03:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20552_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 20552_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20554_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 20554_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20558_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 20558_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20562_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 20562_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20565_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 20565_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20566_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 20566_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20569_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 20569_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20573_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 20573_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20575_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 20575_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20577_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 20577_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20584_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 20584_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20588_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 20588_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20589_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 20589_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20592_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 20592_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04084_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 04084_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:07.78 +22:13:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field And-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:55:23.039 +22:00:09.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:55:23.802 +21:59:55.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:55:23.039 +22:00:09.24
Second-epoch image center 00:55:23.802 +21:59:55.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0049 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:55:25.059 +21:59:15.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:55:23.039 +22:00:09.24
Second-epoch image center 00:55:25.059 +21:59:15.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0168 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:55:23.802 +21:59:55.21
Second-epoch second image center 00:55:25.059 +21:59:15.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01202 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1q6W7YxWh8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XK6I6pwcpw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cR8iAOV0ec
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kaZJad5naq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits and wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits and wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits and wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits) and catalog (wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 45327 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0156 to 22.5375 deg, Dec +16.5297 to +27.2731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0156 to 22.5375 deg, Dec 16.5297 to 27.2731 deg
Loaded 6157 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4637 out of 5124 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5124 out of 45327 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.521400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.521400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.01
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 45327 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0156 to 22.5375 deg, Dec +16.5297 to +27.2731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0156 to 22.5375 deg, Dec 16.5297 to 27.2731 deg
Loaded 6157 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4637 out of 5124 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5124 out of 45327 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 45520 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0488 to 22.5661 deg, Dec +16.5295 to +27.2656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0488 to 22.5661 deg, Dec 16.5295 to 27.2656 deg
Loaded 6142 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4634 out of 5107 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5107 out of 45520 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 42 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
2.1 pix And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
2.8 pix fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
2.7 pix fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
15.5 mag. And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
15.3 mag. fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
15.3 mag. fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1q6W7YxWh8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits' -> 'wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=2175, bad_region=0, passed=45292
Got 45292 stars (including 43053 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45292 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5339)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.406 n_q1=1206 n_q2=1159 n_q3=1248 n_q4=1241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.122
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits -region wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XK6I6pwcpw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits' -> 'wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=2240, bad_region=0, passed=45492
Got 45492 stars (including 43197 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45492 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=1194 n_q2=1164 n_q3=1253 n_q4=1244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits -region wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.cR8iAOV0ec (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1506, bad_region=44, passed=38073
Got 38073 stars (including 36477 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38073 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5335)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=12.245 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.630 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.630 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.914 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.914 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=0.282 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.423 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.423 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4851 robust_rms_before=1.050 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.263 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.282 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.448 worst_region_rms_after=0.423 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.385 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.423
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.448 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.448 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.263 arcsec matched=4851
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=1149 n_q2=1432 n_q3=1006 n_q4=1264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits -region wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kaZJad5naq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1651, bad_region=46, passed=40117
Got 40117 stars (including 38361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40117 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5336)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=12.502 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.743 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.743 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=0.410 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.796 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.796 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=0.262 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.390 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.390 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4851 robust_rms_before=1.031 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.259 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.262 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.429 worst_region_rms_after=0.390 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.370 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.390
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.429 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.429 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.259 arcsec matched=4851
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.230 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1136 n_q2=1369 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits -region wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-13-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_And-07-Q1b1x1_051507_TTUQ1b1x1_880416_I4QhmnRW/wcs_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field And-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:53:55.30 +24:46:15.0: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:54:44.62 +22:12:48.7: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:52:14.34 +27:09:19.0: 14.52 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:45:25.06 +18:53:23.7: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:35:42.14 +20:03:39.5: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:15:04.62 +16:52:54.1: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:55:19.59 +22:42:46.4: 14.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:15:08.45 +24:11:33.6: 14.60 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:59:29.82 +20:04:21.8: 14.57 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:23:24.66 +22:20:35.9: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:53:55.30 +24:46:15.0: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:54:44.62 +22:12:48.7: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:52:14.34 +27:09:19.0: 14.61 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:15:08.45 +24:11:33.6: 14.64 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:15:04.62 +16:52:54.1: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:35:42.14 +20:03:39.5: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:55:19.59 +22:42:46.4: 15.18 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:59:29.82 +20:04:21.8: 14.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:45:25.06 +18:53:23.7: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:55.30 +24:46:15.0: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2473 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:54:44.62 +22:12:48.7: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2430 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:52:14.34 +27:09:19.0: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5662 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:59:29.82 +20:04:21.8: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5791 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:15:04.62 +16:52:54.1: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4453 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:42.14 +20:03:39.5: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0936 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:15:08.45 +24:11:33.6: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6406 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:45:25.06 +18:53:23.7: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9947 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:55:19.59 +22:42:46.4: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8487 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:23:24.66 +22:20:35.9: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:24.66 +22:20:35.9: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4769 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:22:17.01 +24:42:31.0: 11.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:23:07.65 +19:28:03.8: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:25:44.54 +24:01:38.4: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:36:59.50 +22:18:20.5: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:31:37.65 +25:30:34.3: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:23:54.26 +26:56:29.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:14:12.07 +24:14:39.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:43:29.00 +24:16:43.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:39:04.50 +24:12:31.7: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:23:54.26 +26:56:29.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:54.26 +26:56:29.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:36:59.50 +22:18:20.5: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:22:17.01 +24:42:31.0: 11.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:31:37.65 +25:30:34.3: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:23:07.65 +19:28:03.8: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:25:44.54 +24:01:38.4: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:36:59.50 +22:18:20.5: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6477 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:17.01 +24:42:31.0: ref_mag=11.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5476 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:23:07.65 +19:28:03.8: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5112 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:37.65 +25:30:34.3: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7706 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:25:44.54 +24:01:38.4: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4517 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:14:12.07 +24:14:39.3: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:03:31.18 +17:09:37.1: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:43:29.00 +24:16:43.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:39:04.50 +24:12:31.7: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:39:04.50 +24:12:31.7: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7478 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:03:31.18 +17:09:37.1: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:03:31.18 +17:09:37.1: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0438 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:42:24.11 +22:48:45.5: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:56:20.28 +26:59:15.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:23:05.92 +17:35:58.8: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:46:36.76 +18:05:03.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:22:57.06 +23:15:48.3: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:10:09.30 +16:50:58.5: 14.49 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:45:57.32 +25:13:07.4: 14.60 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:23:05.92 +17:35:58.8: 14.55 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:22:57.06 +23:15:48.3: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:56:20.28 +26:59:15.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:42:24.11 +22:48:45.5: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:46:36.76 +18:05:03.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:05.92 +17:35:58.8: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3869 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:42:24.11 +22:48:45.5: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0854 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:30:50.92 +23:48:19.5: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:10:09.30 +16:50:58.5: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:10:09.30 +16:50:58.5: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2912 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:45:57.32 +25:13:07.4: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:45:57.32 +25:13:07.4: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5825 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:30:50.92 +23:48:19.5: 14.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:50.92 +23:48:19.5: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6055 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:25:30.87 +26:05:00.4: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:44:03.88 +26:12:25.0: 14.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:09:35.21 +23:06:58.1: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:00:18.09 +23:26:16.9: 14.86 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:25:30.87 +26:05:00.4: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:44:03.88 +26:12:25.0: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:30.87 +26:05:00.4: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6204 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:44:03.88 +26:12:25.0: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6283 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:06:47.63 +17:39:01.0: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:09:35.21 +23:06:58.1: 14.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:09:35.21 +23:06:58.1: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6038 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:00:18.09 +23:26:16.9: 14.82 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:00:18.09 +23:26:16.9: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4333 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:06:47.63 +17:39:01.0: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:06:47.63 +17:39:01.0: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5949 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:27:57.58 +24:18:31.9: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:27:57.58 +24:18:31.9: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:27:57.58 +24:18:31.9: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6180 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53974.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54254.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54678.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54790.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54821.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53434_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53434_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53435_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53435_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53436_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53436_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53444_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53444_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53448_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53448_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53450_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53450_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53451_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53451_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53453_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53453_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53457_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53457_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53464_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53464_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53468_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53468_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53469_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53469_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:29:25.36 +24:40:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53473_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53473_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53474_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53474_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53475_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53475_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53476_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53476_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53489_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53489_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:43:18.76 +27:11:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53549_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53549_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53752_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53752_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:00:28.45 +23:40:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53815_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 53815_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53974_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
Preparing report for the candidate 53974_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54243_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 54243_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:55:12.35 +26:36:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54254_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
Preparing report for the candidate 54254_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54328_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 54328_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54602_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 54602_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54604_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 54604_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54678_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
Preparing report for the candidate 54678_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54790_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
Preparing report for the candidate 54790_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54799_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 54799_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54821_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
Preparing report for the candidate 54821_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54870_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 54870_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:26:53.61 +22:08:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54938_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 54938_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54965_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 54965_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54971_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 54971_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55008_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 55008_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55038_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 55038_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55069_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 55069_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55123_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 55123_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55155_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 55155_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55280_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 55280_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26441_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 26441_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:48:20.92 +27:03:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35532_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322
The candidate 35532_fd_And-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_05-14-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322 did not pass the final checks
