This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3999* 00 42 25.35 +01 36 45.6 7.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.8999,7.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.3999 7.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3999* 00 42 25.42 +01 36 45.1 7.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.8999,7.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.3999 7.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3999* 00 42 13.37 +01 37 05.9 8.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.8999,8.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.3999 8.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3999* 00 41 55.85 +01 34 06.8 10.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.8999,10.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.3999 10.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.3999 2461324.8999 12.36 01:07:50.26 -04:39:21.9
133.52390 -67.18996 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.191 Kolga 0 -1 1 12.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:07:50.26 -04:39:21.9: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:07:50.26 -04:39:21.9: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3999* 01 07 50.26 -04 39 21.9 12.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.8999,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.3999 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.3999 2461324.8999 12.48 00:58:24.52 +01:26:45.3
126.57043 -61.37658 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.58 Concordia -0 0 0 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:58:24.52 +01:26:45.3: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:58:24.52 +01:26:45.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3999* 00 58 24.52 +01 26 45.3 12.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.8999,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.3999 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.3999 2461324.8999 12.88 00:30:37.22 -02:46:00.3
110.48883 -65.13435 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.384 Burdigala -0 0 1 12.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:30:37.22 -02:46:00.3: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:30:37.22 -02:46:00.3: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3999* 00 30 37.22 -02 46 00.3 12.9 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.8999,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.3999 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.3999 2461324.8999 13.63 00:40:20.94 +00:23:15.8
116.94875 -62.35514 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1132 Hollandia 0 -1 1 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:40:20.94 +00:23:15.8: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:40:20.94 +00:23:15.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3999* 00 40 20.94 +00 23 15.8 13.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.8999,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.3999 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.3999 2461324.8999 13.74 00:50:43.19 -04:20:28.8
122.46974 -67.21244 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.155 Scylla 0 -0 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:50:43.19 -04:20:28.8: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:50:43.19 -04:20:28.8: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3999* 00 50 43.19 -04 20 28.8 13.7 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.8999,13.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.3999 13.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.3999 2461324.8999 13.62 00:57:33.82 -05:42:18.6
127.09797 -68.52735 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.805 Hormuthia -1 -0 1 14.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:57:33.82 -05:42:18.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:57:33.82 -05:42:18.6: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3999* 00 57 33.82 -05 42 18.6 13.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.8999,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.3999 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.3999 2461324.8999 13.70 01:07:21.76 +00:26:09.3
131.48461 -62.17110 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.522 Helga -0 -0 0 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:07:21.76 +00:26:09.3: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:07:21.76 +00:26:09.3: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3999* 01 07 21.76 +00 26 09.3 13.7 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.8999,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.3999 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.3999 2461324.8999 14.38 00:40:47.13 +01:21:28.6
117.36368 -61.39858 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.853 Nansenia -0 -0 0 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:40:47.13 +01:21:28.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:40:47.13 +01:21:28.6: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3999* 00 40 47.13 +01 21 28.6 14.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.8999,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.3999 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.3999 2461324.8999 13.36 00:49:35.07 +02:22:54.4
121.99212 -60.48659 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" SU Cet
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.200 CV Y 0.770 CV 2453727.62720 0.542645700000
The object was found in astcheck.3857 Cellino 202 398 447 17.1 -0 -0
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the predicted asteroid brightness, but the matched variable star above likely accounts for this object.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:49:35.07 +02:22:54.4: 14.42 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:49:35.07 +02:22:54.4: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3999* 00 49 35.07 +02 22 54.4 13.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
SU Cet,2461324.8999,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
SU Cet 20261011.3999 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461324.90030595 11.10.2026 09:36:16.434 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5379
Objects passed selection criteria: 5378
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4805
Average stars matched: 4698 (97.7732 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231792 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 11 04:38:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q1: 612 -> 1003, 38.983% > 20%; fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits vs fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q3: 830 -> 1058, 21.550% > 20%; fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits vs fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461324.90030595 11.10.2026 09:36:16.434 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 18
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28361
Objects passed selection criteria: 28306
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 25059
Average stars matched: 24160.2 (96.4135 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 251844 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 11 04:39:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461324.89956623
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:22.993 -02:01:42.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:22.993 -02:01:42.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0298 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.657 -02:01:14.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:25.657 -02:01:14.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0200 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:22.993 -02:01:42.72
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:25.657 -02:01:14.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01351 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DHM8PmfhfY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8tVq80VuEl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GitR8DPsDC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hslY0wPTbv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to +3.3142 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to 3.3142 deg
Loaded 3965 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3364 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3364 out of 5517 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.870150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.870150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to +3.3142 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to 3.3142 deg
Loaded 3965 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3364 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3364 out of 5517 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 5460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9695 to 20.8088 deg, Dec -7.2935 to +3.3227 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9695 to 20.8088 deg, Dec -7.2935 to 3.3227 deg
Loaded 3971 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3212 out of 3360 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3360 out of 5460 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.0 pix Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
15.4 mag. Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.DHM8PmfhfY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=396, bad_region=0, passed=5517
Got 5517 stars (including 5117 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5517 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5380)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.228 n_q1=1224 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1146 n_q4=1238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8tVq80VuEl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=414, bad_region=0, passed=5460
Got 5460 stars (including 5034 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1199 n_q2=1300 n_q3=1145 n_q4=1246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.354
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GitR8DPsDC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=182, bad_region=0, passed=3805
Got 3805 stars (including 3617 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3805 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3552 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3548 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3547 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3548 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3552 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3548 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3548 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 3548 stars left (next iteration limit 3902)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3548 robust_rms=11.120 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.331 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.331 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3548 robust_rms=0.436 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.748 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.748 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3548 robust_rms=0.287 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.416 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.416 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3548 robust_rms_before=1.123 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.270 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.287 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.435 worst_region_rms_after=0.416 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.449 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.416
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.435 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.435 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.270 arcsec matched=3548
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits N_match=3548 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=612 n_q2=1050 n_q3=830 n_q4=1056 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hslY0wPTbv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=224, bad_region=0, passed=4562
Got 4562 stars (including 4336 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4562 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4253 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4247 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4247 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4253 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4247 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4247 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4247 stars left (next iteration limit 4671)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4247 robust_rms=13.179 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.485 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.485 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4247 robust_rms=0.419 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.665 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.665 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4247 robust_rms=0.289 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.385 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.385 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4247 robust_rms_before=1.067 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.271 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.289 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.384 worst_region_rms_after=0.385 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.326 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.385
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.384 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.384 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.271 arcsec matched=4247
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits N_match=4247 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1003 n_q2=1146 n_q3=1058 n_q4=1040 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits sigma_overall=0.260 worst_q_ratio=1.267
ref2=Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits sigma_overall=0.301 worst_q_ratio=1.354
new1=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits sigma_overall=0.273 worst_q_ratio=1.106
new2=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.274 worst_q_ratio=1.095
reference average sigma_overall=0.2805 worst_q_ratio=1.3105
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q1: 612 -> 1003, 38.983% > 20%; fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits vs fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q3: 830 -> 1058, 21.550% > 20%; fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits vs fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061_astrometric_residuals.png (4891 matched stars from wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291_astrometric_residuals.png (3548 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (4247 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20253_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 20253_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02496_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
The candidate 02496_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:47:53.18 -01:18:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:22.993 -02:01:42.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:22.993 -02:01:42.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0298 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.657 -02:01:14.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:25.657 -02:01:14.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0200 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:22.993 -02:01:42.72
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:25.657 -02:01:14.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01351 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uIijYm2Eb1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R3qfGcqGir
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QR7WF6zjtc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AMXElmRHqk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29514 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to +3.3164 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to 3.3164 deg
Loaded 3973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3194 out of 3433 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3433 out of 29514 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.781250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.781250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29514 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to +3.3164 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to 3.3164 deg
Loaded 3973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3194 out of 3433 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3433 out of 29514 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 30077 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9695 to 20.8139 deg, Dec -7.2935 to +3.3255 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9695 to 20.8139 deg, Dec -7.2935 to 3.3255 deg
Loaded 3973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3182 out of 3441 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3441 out of 30077 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 18 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
1.9 pix Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
15.6 mag. Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uIijYm2Eb1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1068, bad_region=0, passed=29501
Got 29501 stars (including 28375 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29501 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.234 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.226 n_q1=1259 n_q2=1244 n_q3=1200 n_q4=1191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.R3qfGcqGir (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1115, bad_region=1, passed=30063
Got 30063 stars (including 28889 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30063 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=1263 n_q2=1242 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.324
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QR7WF6zjtc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=477, bad_region=39, passed=19002
Got 19002 stars (including 18461 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19002 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5341)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=11.354 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.381 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.381 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=0.448 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.803 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.803 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=0.313 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.442 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.442 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4858 robust_rms_before=1.133 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.313 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.443 worst_region_rms_after=0.442 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.465 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.442
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.443 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.443 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.300 arcsec matched=4858
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=909 n_q2=1406 n_q3=1182 n_q4=1361 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.AMXElmRHqk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=594, bad_region=43, passed=22372
Got 22372 stars (including 21702 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22372 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5355)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=13.070 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.549 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.549 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.424 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.694 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.694 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.296 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.394 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=1.067 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.280 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.296 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.390 worst_region_rms_after=0.394 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.325 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.394
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.390 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.390 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.280 arcsec matched=4869
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=1215 n_q2=1288 n_q3=1226 n_q4=1140 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_043707_TTUQ1b1x1_4138894_rDRnaw1f/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:03:26.20 -02:07:08.4: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:58:24.52 +01:26:45.3: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:58:23.81 +02:35:13.7: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:57:57.62 +02:30:26.3: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:30:37.22 -02:46:00.3: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:42:47.37 +03:04:22.6: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:07:50.26 -04:39:21.9: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:42:47.37 +03:04:22.6: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:03:26.20 -02:07:08.4: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:07:50.26 -04:39:21.9: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:58:24.52 +01:26:45.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:30:37.22 -02:46:00.3: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:58:23.81 +02:35:13.7: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:57:57.62 +02:30:26.3: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:42:47.37 +03:04:22.6: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5330 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:03:26.20 -02:07:08.4: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7332 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:23.81 +02:35:13.7: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9366 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:57:57.62 +02:30:26.3: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9333 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:57:33.82 -05:42:18.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:40:20.94 +00:23:15.8: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:50:43.19 -04:20:28.8: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:07:21.76 +00:26:09.3: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:50:43.19 -04:20:28.8: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:40:20.94 +00:23:15.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:57:33.82 -05:42:18.6: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:07:21.76 +00:26:09.3: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:40:47.13 +01:21:28.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:52:55.74 -06:12:03.8: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:49:35.07 +02:22:54.4: 14.42 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:40:47.13 +01:21:28.6: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:52:55.74 -06:12:03.8: 15.27 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:52:55.74 -06:12:03.8: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4055 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:49:35.07 +02:22:54.4: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:49:35.07 +02:22:54.4: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3621 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02727.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32465.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32474.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32544.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32842.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32849.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32864.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32981.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33067.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32257_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
The candidate 32257_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32259_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
The candidate 32259_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32262_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 32262_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32265_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 32265_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32287_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 32287_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32465_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 32465_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32474_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 32474_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32544_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 32544_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32644_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
The candidate 32644_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32681_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
The candidate 32681_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32842_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 32842_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32849_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 32849_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32864_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 32864_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32981_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 32981_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33067_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 33067_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33091_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
The candidate 33091_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02727_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 02727_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13585_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292
The candidate 13585_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-36-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292 did not pass the final checks
