This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3446* 05 21 07.63 +23 38 20.0 11.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461324.8446,11.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261011.3446 11.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.3446 2461324.8446 10.85 05:19:57.96 +23:36:11.1
181.36658 -7.72094 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis -1 -2 2 11.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:57.96 +23:36:11.1: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:57.96 +23:36:11.1: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3446* 05 19 57.96 +23 36 11.1 10.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.8446,10.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.3446 10.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3446* 05 21 07.62 +23 38 19.9 11.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461324.8446,11.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261011.3446 11.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.3446 2461324.8446 13.01 05:17:12.13 +21:20:00.5
182.90303 -9.52408 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -1 -0 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:12.13 +21:20:00.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:12.13 +21:20:00.5: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 11.3446* 05 17 12.13 +21 20 00.5 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461324.8446,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261011.3446 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461324.84499277 11.10.2026 08:16:37.375 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18359
Objects passed selection criteria: 18281
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13556.2
Average stars matched: 12994 (95.8525 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 243540 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 11 03:21:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461324.84499277 11.10.2026 08:16:37.375 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 126
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 76 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 139846
Objects passed selection criteria: 139460
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 107671
Average stars matched: 101916 (94.6548 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 538296 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 11 03:23:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461324.84427588
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.958 +22:00:04.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:20.958 +22:00:04.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0057 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.407 +21:59:44.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:18.407 +21:59:44.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0059 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:20.958 +22:00:04.60
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:18.407 +21:59:44.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01137 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uTI3OXVfDv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PylabCKFky
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Kw43xLnkqs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ldI07xIg9r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.uTI3OXVfDv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=3694, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 17090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4705 stars left (next iteration limit 5175)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4705 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1788 n_q2=376 n_q3=1844 n_q4=697 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.PylabCKFky (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=3377, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 15475 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4708 stars left (next iteration limit 5177)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4708 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1784 n_q2=371 n_q3=1863 n_q4=690 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Kw43xLnkqs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1157, bad_region=5261, passed=14928
Got 14928 stars (including 8950 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4719 stars left (next iteration limit 5190)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4719 robust_rms=7.469 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.781 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.781 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4719 robust_rms=0.573 arcsec worst_region_rms=2.233 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=2.233 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4719 robust_rms=0.419 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.819 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.819 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4719 robust_rms_before=0.990 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.480 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.419 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.783 worst_region_rms_after=0.819 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.577 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.819
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.783 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.783 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.480 arcsec matched=4719
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits N_match=4719 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.441 n_q1=1039 n_q2=1450 n_q3=843 n_q4=1387 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ldI07xIg9r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1021, bad_region=5059, passed=13077
Got 13077 stars (including 7420 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13077 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4802 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9071 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4802 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9071 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9071 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4728 stars left (next iteration limit 5196)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4728 robust_rms=7.779 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.324 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.324 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4728 robust_rms=0.626 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.706 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.706 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4728 robust_rms=0.454 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.753 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.753 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4728 robust_rms_before=0.989 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.517 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.454 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.777 worst_region_rms_after=0.753 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.471 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.753
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.777 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.777 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.517 arcsec matched=4728
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits N_match=4728 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.657 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=1058 n_q2=1368 n_q3=805 n_q4=1497 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.193
ref2=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.515 worst_q_ratio=1.175
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits sigma_overall=0.497 worst_q_ratio=1.216
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits sigma_overall=0.532 worst_q_ratio=1.234
reference average sigma_overall=0.4505 worst_q_ratio=1.184
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4705 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4708 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269_astrometric_residuals.png (4719 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270_astrometric_residuals.png (4728 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:57.96 +23:36:11.1: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:57.96 +23:36:11.1: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:19:57.96 +23:36:11.1: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8178 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07450.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31136_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
Preparing report for the candidate 31136_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07450_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
Preparing report for the candidate 07450_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.36 +17:54:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 13s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:19:57.96 +23:36:11.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.958 +22:00:04.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:20.958 +22:00:04.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0057 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.407 +21:59:44.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:18.407 +21:59:44.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0059 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:20.958 +22:00:04.60
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:18.407 +21:59:44.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01137 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.919Y4i4oxV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LkM6Hf0n7X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cHy8bp7Sv2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uS13fbw3Qb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.76
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.76
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 102 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.919Y4i4oxV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=23036, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 124901 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4762 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4763 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5185)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1719 n_q2=436 n_q3=1839 n_q4=719 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LkM6Hf0n7X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=20219, bad_region=22244, passed=162977
Got 162977 stars (including 121992 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4704 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4704 stars left (next iteration limit 5176)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4704 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.412 n_q1=1720 n_q2=418 n_q3=1843 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.cHy8bp7Sv2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=10729, bad_region=31253, passed=109927
Got 109927 stars (including 71351 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 109927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4766 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4701 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4701 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86681 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4767 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4702 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86681 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4702 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86681 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4702 stars left (next iteration limit 5171)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4702 robust_rms=7.656 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.417 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.417 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4702 robust_rms=0.576 arcsec worst_region_rms=2.019 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=2.019 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4702 robust_rms=0.409 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.822 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.822 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4702 robust_rms_before=0.992 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.473 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.409 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.774 worst_region_rms_after=0.822 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.688 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.822
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.774 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.774 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.473 arcsec matched=4702
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits N_match=4702 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=1093 n_q2=1407 n_q3=841 n_q4=1361 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.uS13fbw3Qb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=9000, bad_region=31903, passed=100627
Got 100627 stars (including 63168 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 100627 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4770 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4702 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4702 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4770 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4703 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4703 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4703 stars left (next iteration limit 5172)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4703 robust_rms=7.838 arcsec worst_region_rms=18.820 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=18.820 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4703 robust_rms=0.619 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.615 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.615 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4703 robust_rms=0.450 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.770 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.770 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4703 robust_rms_before=0.983 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.494 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.450 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.788 worst_region_rms_after=0.770 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.497 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.770
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.788 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.788 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.494 arcsec matched=4703
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits N_match=4703 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.649 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.469 n_q1=1107 n_q2=1369 n_q3=797 n_q4=1430 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.248
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-15-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0269.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_031718_TTUQ2b1x1_573662_RYfeGHa2/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:36:23.47 +22:12:06.7: 14.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:27.57 +20:15:39.3: 14.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:46:57.03 +24:39:32.3: 14.85 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:31:17.33 +21:51:53.3: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:36.99 +19:10:36.9: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:21.22 +25:35:20.5: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:20.89 +21:21:59.0: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:08.16 +18:53:09.8: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:50:24.31 +19:26:21.9: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:36:23.47 +22:12:06.7: 14.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:36.99 +19:10:36.9: 14.49 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:17.33 +21:51:53.3: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:27.57 +20:15:39.3: 14.60 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:46:57.03 +24:39:32.3: 14.87 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:23.47 +22:12:06.7: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2367 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:17.33 +21:51:53.3: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2484 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:42:36.99 +19:10:36.9: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4257 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:43:27.57 +20:15:39.3: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6849 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:57.03 +24:39:32.3: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5523 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:20.89 +21:21:59.0: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:21.22 +25:35:20.5: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:21:10.38 +17:49:49.0: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:08.16 +18:53:09.8: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:20.89 +21:21:59.0: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1015 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:42:21.22 +25:35:20.5: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2161 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:08.16 +18:53:09.8: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9597 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:50:24.31 +19:26:21.9: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:24.31 +19:26:21.9: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2331 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:39:28.22 +19:17:39.9: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:21:10.38 +17:49:49.0: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:21:10.38 +17:49:49.0: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5978 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:47:42.74 +19:14:39.4: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:39:28.22 +19:17:39.9: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:50:49.32 +22:02:42.0: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:31:10.14 +20:47:23.1: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:24.07 +20:11:58.8: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:28.22 +19:17:39.9: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0456 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:17.71 +19:09:23.4: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:07.09 +19:55:45.8: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:47:42.74 +19:14:39.4: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:42.74 +19:14:39.4: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7729 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:50:49.32 +22:02:42.0: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:10.14 +20:47:23.1: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:49.32 +22:02:42.0: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5395 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:10.14 +20:47:23.1: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4549 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:17.71 +19:09:23.4: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:24.07 +20:11:58.8: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:17.71 +19:09:23.4: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6587 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:24.07 +20:11:58.8: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6017 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:07.09 +19:55:45.8: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:07.09 +19:55:45.8: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3891 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:12.13 +21:20:00.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:15.05 +17:43:49.5: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.64 +25:20:28.7: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:55.39 +19:03:04.3: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:12.13 +21:20:00.5: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.64 +25:20:28.7: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:15.05 +17:43:49.5: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.64 +25:20:28.7: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3711 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:40.11 +22:58:28.3: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:15.05 +17:43:49.5: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5111 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:55.39 +19:03:04.3: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:55.39 +19:03:04.3: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4844 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:40.11 +22:58:28.3: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:40.11 +22:58:28.3: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5443 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:00.04 +23:33:03.2: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:36:38.42 +20:13:50.7: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:00.04 +23:33:03.2: 13.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:42:00.04 +23:33:03.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8977 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:47:55.56 +24:27:16.9: 14.26 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:36:38.42 +20:13:50.7: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:38.42 +20:13:50.7: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9470 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:47:55.56 +24:27:16.9: 14.44 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:55.56 +24:27:16.9: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1287 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:44:09.97 +19:08:04.6: 14.91 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:52.87 +17:47:11.1: 14.82 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:17.38 +21:29:50.6: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:49.50 +22:33:10.9: 14.86 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:46:36.08 +23:36:19.0: 14.99 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:41:51.51 +25:16:16.4: 15.07 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:52.87 +17:47:11.1: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:47.06 +21:17:14.4: 14.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:52.87 +17:47:11.1: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6439 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:44:09.97 +19:08:04.6: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:17.38 +21:29:50.6: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:09.97 +19:08:04.6: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5769 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:17.38 +21:29:50.6: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3421 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:49.50 +22:33:10.9: 15.12 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:49.50 +22:33:10.9: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6797 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:47:08.34 +22:07:03.5: 14.96 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:46:36.08 +23:36:19.0: 15.23 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:36.08 +23:36:19.0: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8544 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:41:51.51 +25:16:16.4: 15.02 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:47.06 +21:17:14.4: 14.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:51.51 +25:16:16.4: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9568 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:47.06 +21:17:14.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8214 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:47:08.34 +22:07:03.5: 14.87 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:08.34 +22:07:03.5: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0155 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:49.03 +21:30:37.7: 15.13 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:05.06 +20:18:41.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:49.03 +21:30:37.7: 15.31 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:49.03 +21:30:37.7: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9760 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:05.06 +20:18:41.8: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:05.06 +20:18:41.8: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0674 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193133.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189102_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189102_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189113_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189113_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189130_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189130_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:21.12 +23:43:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189142_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189142_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189158_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189158_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:58.20 +20:22:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189162_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189162_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189164_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189164_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:52.60 +22:01:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189173_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189173_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189181_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189181_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:54.65 +20:46:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189184_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189184_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:44.96 +21:39:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189193_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189193_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189197_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189197_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189200_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189200_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189202_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189202_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189206_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189206_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:17.80 +22:36:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189209_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189209_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189212_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189212_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189217_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189217_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:29.73 +18:57:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189227_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189227_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.39 +21:03:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189228_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189228_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:41.90 +20:11:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189230_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189230_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:33.66 +19:32:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189231_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189231_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189237_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189237_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189242_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189242_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:27.39 +20:59:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189245_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189245_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189246_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189246_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189247_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189247_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189248_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189248_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189250_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189250_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:56.60 +25:28:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189251_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189251_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189257_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189257_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:57.99 +22:41:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189261_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189261_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:26.74 +25:17:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189263_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189263_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:54.23 +25:41:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189269_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189269_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:07.01 +18:02:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189270_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189270_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.18 +18:20:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189271_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189271_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:00.09 +18:45:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189273_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189273_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:33.41 +22:20:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189275_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189275_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:30.50 +19:19:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189277_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 189277_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:45.64 +17:48:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189843_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
Preparing report for the candidate 189843_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191709_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 191709_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.38 +18:52:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191721_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 191721_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:11.00 +20:10:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191855_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 191855_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:13.78 +21:51:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192167_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 192167_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.69 +19:34:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192278_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 192278_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:02.95 +18:33:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192365_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 192365_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.13 +20:53:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192493_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 192493_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.87 +19:32:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193133_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
Preparing report for the candidate 193133_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193140_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 193140_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:29.13 +18:44:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193281_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 193281_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:17.32 +20:45:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193433_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 193433_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193474_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 193474_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193604_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 193604_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:15.12 +19:35:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193800_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 193800_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.58 +25:22:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193846_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 193846_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193898_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 193898_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:12.03 +19:49:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194015_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 194015_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.55 +21:24:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194044_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 194044_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.19 +23:07:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194070_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 194070_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:03.29 +20:08:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194240_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 194240_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194347_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 194347_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:07.01 +24:22:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194363_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 194363_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:27.34 +21:47:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194525_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 194525_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:31.13 +19:46:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194532_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 194532_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:27.57 +18:02:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194635_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 194635_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:08.26 +22:06:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194701_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 194701_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:30.14 +21:58:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195010_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 195010_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:31.53 +18:39:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195068_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 195068_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.98 +19:23:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195331_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 195331_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:57.19 +25:53:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195373_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 195373_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:14.70 +21:13:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195572_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 195572_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:58.17 +20:38:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195679_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 195679_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195766_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 195766_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:24.92 +22:00:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195777_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 195777_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195840_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 195840_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:02.28 +24:55:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195856_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 195856_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:26.39 +23:40:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195986_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 195986_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:58.96 +21:26:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196172_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 196172_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:20.14 +25:31:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196293_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 196293_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:09.10 +18:54:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196420_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 196420_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196840_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 196840_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:54.28 +19:27:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197325_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 197325_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:34.66 +17:59:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197372_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 197372_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.87 +23:13:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197393_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 197393_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:28.68 +21:47:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197520_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 197520_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:39.98 +21:19:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197589_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 197589_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:30.12 +21:59:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197763_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 197763_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:37.59 +20:42:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198072_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 198072_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198576_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 198576_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198586_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 198586_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198951_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 198951_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199054_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 199054_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199207_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 199207_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199218_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 199218_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199224_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 199224_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199258_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 199258_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.36 +26:13:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180001_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 180001_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84766_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 84766_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113623_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 113623_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.35 +17:54:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54848_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270
The candidate 54848_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-16-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270 did not pass the final checks