NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Leo-05-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    12.08    10:14:02.05 +10:23:26.2   1038 0864   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    12.03    10:14:02.06 +10:23:25.8   1031 0860   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 10.4500  2461323.9501  12.05  10:14:02.06 +10:23:26.0
229.56397  49.39035 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
16 Psyche                  -0      0       1  12.2     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:14:02.06 +10:23:26.0:  15.75 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:14:02.06 +10:23:26.0:  15.69 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    13.31    10:47:07.50 +14:14:58.5   5802 3443   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    13.31    10:47:07.54 +14:14:58.2   5796 3438   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 10.4500  2461323.9501  13.31  10:47:07.52 +14:14:58.4
230.60878  58.32379 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
42 Isis                    -0      0       0  13.6     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:47:07.52 +14:14:58.4:  15.80 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:47:07.52 +14:14:58.4:  15.84 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    13.25    10:59:22.80 +13:41:16.1   7612 3238   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    13.16    10:59:22.73 +13:41:15.9   7605 3233   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 10.4500  2461323.9501  13.21  10:59:22.77 +13:41:16.0
234.51447  60.60910 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.9 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
187 Lamberta                -0      1       1  13.6     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:59:22.77 +13:41:16.0:  15.81 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:59:22.77 +13:41:16.0:  15.80 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    13.80    10:30:51.42 +13:59:01.7   3446 3145   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    13.66    10:30:51.53 +13:59:01.2   3440 3141   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 10.4500  2461323.9501  13.73  10:30:51.47 +13:59:01.4
227.65129  54.72214 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
94 Aurora                  -0     -0       0  13.7     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:30:51.47 +13:59:01.4:  15.90 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:30:51.47 +13:59:01.4:  15.90 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 4

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits
Field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 253360 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 253360 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits_preview.png'
Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits

renamed 'Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits_preview.png'
Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 542.1009 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 438.8695 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2093.9588 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 547.3808 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2090.9585 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 571.1032 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.86267 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.042 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 15.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-10T05:47:28.2573176' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-10T10:47:28.2573176' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61323.4496326041 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-10T10:47:38.1573018' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61323.4497471876 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 159.995950442187 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9995432994634 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.785 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 83.0133333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.86304041163331 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 40 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 69.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 32.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.0004 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/d_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits :) Spent 0.546619 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/d_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 15.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-10T05:48:20.3508770' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-10T10:48:20.3508770' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61323.4502355326 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-10T10:48:30.2548917' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61323.4503501621 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 159.995950405266 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9995433219062 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.9711111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 83.1327777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.81750859887177 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 40 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 69.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 32.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.0004 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/d_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits :) Spent 0.543044 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/d_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits


fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.94974834 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Image size: 945.6'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:40:04.508 +13:56:43.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 Second-epoch image center 10:40:04.508 +13:56:43.64 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0607 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits Image size: 945.5'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:40:07.304 +13:57:05.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 Second-epoch image center 10:40:07.304 +13:57:05.99 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0595 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:40:04.508 +13:56:43.64 Second-epoch second image center 10:40:07.304 +13:57:05.99 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01290 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d6pSFzhnMS Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8YRZpxd2ce Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hZLGgq1SRy Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BBR5YHo2mJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2604 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2604 deg Loaded 4240 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3428 out of 3506 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3506 out of 5744 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.729050 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.729050 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2604 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2604 deg Loaded 4240 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3428 out of 3506 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3506 out of 5744 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=6.6) Read 5709 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7036 to 168.1827 deg, Dec +8.6403 to +19.2435 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7036 to 168.1827 deg, Dec 8.6403 to 19.2435 deg Loaded 4243 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3432 out of 3504 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3504 out of 5709 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (aperture=6.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 2.4 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 2.3 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits 2.3 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.d6pSFzhnMS (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5744 Got 5744 stars (including 5420 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4407 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4399 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5744 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4406 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5744 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5744 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4399 stars left (next iteration limit 4838) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=4399 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=1096 n_q2=1045 n_q3=1189 n_q4=1069 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.8YRZpxd2ce (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=309, bad_region=0, passed=5709 Got 5709 stars (including 5396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5709 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4405 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4397 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5709 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4405 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5709 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5709 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4397 stars left (next iteration limit 4836) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits N_match=4397 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=1094 n_q2=1056 n_q3=1184 n_q4=1063 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.hZLGgq1SRy (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=14, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=317, bad_region=0, passed=3023 Got 3023 stars (including 2701 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3023 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013133 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010507 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2330 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2322 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2322 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2322 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3023 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2329 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2321 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3023 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2321 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3023 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 2321 stars left (next iteration limit 2554) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2321 robust_rms=10.142 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.976 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.976 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2321 robust_rms=0.684 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.966 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.887 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2321 robust_rms=0.371 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.442 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.368 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2321 robust_rms_before=1.914 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.369 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.371 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.477 worst_region_rms_after=0.442 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.984 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.368 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.477 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.477 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.369 arcsec matched=2321 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits N_match=2321 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=605 n_q2=523 n_q3=627 n_q4=566 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.325 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.BBR5YHo2mJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=254, bad_region=0, passed=2954 Got 2954 stars (including 2696 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2954 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013132 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010506 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2336 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2331 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2331 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2331 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2954 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2335 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2331 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2954 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2331 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2954 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 2331 stars left (next iteration limit 2564) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2331 robust_rms=10.475 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.254 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.254 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2331 robust_rms=0.606 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.869 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.869 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2331 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.586 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.381 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2331 robust_rms_before=1.754 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.339 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.376 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.446 worst_region_rms_after=0.586 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.935 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.381 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.446 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.446 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.339 arcsec matched=2331 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits N_match=2331 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=590 n_q2=537 n_q3=623 n_q4=581 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.294 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits sigma_overall=0.405 worst_q_ratio=1.140 ref2=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits sigma_overall=0.396 worst_q_ratio=1.172 new1=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits sigma_overall=0.384 worst_q_ratio=1.325 new2=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits sigma_overall=0.359 worst_q_ratio=1.294 reference average sigma_overall=0.4005 worst_q_ratio=1.156 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141_astrometric_residuals.png (4399 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142_astrometric_residuals.png (4397 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530_astrometric_residuals.png (2321 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531_astrometric_residuals.png (2331 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:15:12.08 +11:41:08.3: 10.96 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:15:12.08 +11:41:08.3: 10.98 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.97 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:12.08 +11:41:08.3: ref_mag=10.97 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9425 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20293_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 20293_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    10.96    10:15:12.06 +11:41:08.3   1190 1659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    10.92    10:15:12.11 +11:41:08.2   1183 1655   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Image size: 945.6'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:40:04.508 +13:56:43.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 Second-epoch image center 10:40:04.508 +13:56:43.64 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0607 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits Image size: 945.5'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:40:07.304 +13:57:05.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 Second-epoch image center 10:40:07.304 +13:57:05.99 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0595 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:40:04.508 +13:56:43.64 Second-epoch second image center 10:40:07.304 +13:57:05.99 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01290 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eM3N5Te99a Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JcQCq7vEkw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MzqCRszmIr Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A3pEI7WKso Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 29548 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2694 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2694 deg Loaded 4250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3390 out of 3597 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3597 out of 29548 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.605650 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.605650 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 29548 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2694 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2694 deg Loaded 4250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3390 out of 3597 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3597 out of 29548 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=5.1) Read 29453 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7036 to 168.1940 deg, Dec +8.6403 to +19.2611 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7036 to 168.1940 deg, Dec 8.6403 to 19.2611 deg Loaded 4245 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3386 out of 3596 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3596 out of 29453 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (aperture=5.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 27 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 2.2 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 2.3 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits 2.2 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.eM3N5Te99a (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1176, bad_region=0, passed=29525 Got 29525 stars (including 28308 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29525 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4403 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4397 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29525 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4403 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4398 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29525 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4398 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29525 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4398 stars left (next iteration limit 4836) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=4398 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.449 n_q1=1120 n_q2=1047 n_q3=1180 n_q4=1051 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.JcQCq7vEkw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1170, bad_region=0, passed=29431 Got 29431 stars (including 28231 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29431 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4400 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4394 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4394 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4394 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29431 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4400 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4394 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29431 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4394 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29431 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4394 stars left (next iteration limit 4833) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits N_match=4394 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=1112 n_q2=1039 n_q3=1188 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.MzqCRszmIr (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=6, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=494, bad_region=36, passed=17056 Got 17056 stars (including 16495 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17056 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013133 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010507 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4320 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4309 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4310 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4309 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17056 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4320 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4310 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17056 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4310 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17056 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4310 stars left (next iteration limit 4739) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4310 robust_rms=10.262 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.840 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.840 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4310 robust_rms=0.678 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.993 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.993 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4310 robust_rms=0.415 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.484 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.443 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4310 robust_rms_before=1.904 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.365 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.415 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.443 worst_region_rms_after=0.484 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.018 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.443 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.443 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.443 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.365 arcsec matched=4310 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits N_match=4310 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=1188 n_q2=950 n_q3=1150 n_q4=1022 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.A3pEI7WKso (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=512, bad_region=35, passed=17251 Got 17251 stars (including 16676 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17251 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013132 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010506 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4309 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4300 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4300 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4300 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17251 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4309 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4301 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17251 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4301 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17251 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4301 stars left (next iteration limit 4730) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4301 robust_rms=10.419 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.310 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.310 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4301 robust_rms=0.634 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.997 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.997 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4301 robust_rms=0.422 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.593 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.460 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4301 robust_rms_before=1.750 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.368 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.422 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.467 worst_region_rms_after=0.593 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.996 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.460 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.467 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.467 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.368 arcsec matched=4301 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits N_match=4301 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=1173 n_q2=954 n_q3=1153 n_q4=1021 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:14:14.73 +14:09:35.5: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:14:02.06 +10:23:26.0: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:15:12.05 +11:41:08.2: 11.11 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:31:01.76 +17:50:08.9: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:20:28.30 +10:06:25.0: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:12:26.22 +14:21:39.8: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:17:11.74 +11:58:39.1: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:43.50 +12:29:19.3: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:20:56.12 +12:29:12.9: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:15:12.05 +11:41:08.2: 11.13 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:12:26.22 +14:21:39.8: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:14:02.06 +10:23:26.0: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:14:14.73 +14:09:35.5: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:20:28.30 +10:06:25.0: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.12 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:31:01.76 +17:50:08.9: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:12.05 +11:41:08.2: ref_mag=11.12 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1846 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:12:26.22 +14:21:39.8: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8083 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:47:07.52 +14:14:58.4: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:14:14.73 +14:09:35.5: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5526 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:31:01.76 +17:50:08.9: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4085 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:28.30 +10:06:25.0: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9938 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:17:11.74 +11:58:39.1: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:17:11.74 +11:58:39.1: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6076 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:20:56.12 +12:29:12.9: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:56.12 +12:29:12.9: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0657 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:43.50 +12:29:19.3: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:43.50 +12:29:19.3: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6949 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:47:07.52 +14:14:58.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:26:32.64 +11:17:51.0: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:15.15 +11:23:10.2: 14.37 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:30:51.47 +13:59:01.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:42.78 +10:34:46.8: 14.45 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:10.32 +11:03:54.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:59:22.77 +13:41:16.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:04.31 +11:08:05.5: 14.36 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:49.23 +11:57:02.5: 14.33 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:30:51.47 +13:59:01.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:15.15 +11:23:10.2: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:26:32.64 +11:17:51.0: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:10.32 +11:03:54.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:10.32 +11:03:54.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:15.15 +11:23:10.2: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9365 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:59:22.77 +13:41:16.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:42.78 +10:34:46.8: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:26:32.64 +11:17:51.0: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6285 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:42.78 +10:34:46.8: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1093 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:04.31 +11:08:05.5: 14.56 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:49.23 +11:57:02.5: 14.18 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:04.31 +11:08:05.5: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0251 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:49.23 +11:57:02.5: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1931 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:44.13 +14:36:46.1: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:11:03.63 +12:09:48.2: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:21.21 +17:13:19.7: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:13:22.73 +09:51:50.1: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:45.67 +12:19:21.5: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:11:03.63 +12:09:48.2: 14.68 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:21.21 +17:13:19.7: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:44.13 +14:36:46.1: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:13:22.73 +09:51:50.1: 14.41 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:21.21 +17:13:19.7: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3711 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:03.63 +12:09:48.2: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4533 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:44.13 +14:36:46.1: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4555 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:22.73 +09:51:50.1: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3391 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:45.67 +12:19:21.5: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:45.67 +12:19:21.5: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3814 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32277.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32681.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32725.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32813.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32154_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32154_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    13.65    10:17:11.77 +11:58:38.0   1483 1847   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    13.57    10:17:11.71 +11:58:40.3   1475 1843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32155_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32155_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    14.20    10:12:39.43 +17:42:55.1   0698 5303   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits **** FOUND 10:12:39.47 +17:42:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32156_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32156_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    13.79    10:09:32.30 +16:10:19.8   0266 4353   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits **** FOUND 10:09:32.23 +16:10:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32161_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32161_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    12.82    10:12:26.25 +14:21:40.1   0732 3267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    12.80    10:12:26.19 +14:21:39.5   0725 3263   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32162_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32162_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    12.52    10:31:01.69 +17:50:09.3   3360 5468   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    12.34    10:31:01.83 +17:50:08.5   3354 5463   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32163_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32163_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    12.55    10:14:14.72 +14:09:35.8   1004 3153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    12.55    10:14:14.74 +14:09:35.3   0997 3149   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32164_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32164_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    12.56    10:15:06.90 +12:30:00.5   1156 2148   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits **** FOUND 10:15:06.90 +12:30:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32165_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32165_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    11.95    10:20:28.27 +10:06:25.3   2009 0734   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    12.04    10:20:28.34 +10:06:24.8   2002 0729   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32219_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32219_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    11.18    10:15:12.03 +11:41:08.2   1190 1659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    11.19    10:15:12.08 +11:41:08.2   1183 1655   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32277_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 Preparing report for the candidate 32277_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32485_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32485_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    13.01    10:20:56.10 +12:29:13.1   2027 2178   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    13.14    10:20:56.13 +12:29:12.8   2020 2174   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32608_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32608_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    13.00    11:08:39.18 +17:13:21.4   8789 5488   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits **** FOUND 11:08:39.15 +17:13:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32678_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32678_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    13.70    10:10:43.54 +12:29:18.2   0507 2123   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    13.69    10:10:43.46 +12:29:20.5   0500 2119   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32681_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 Preparing report for the candidate 32681_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32700_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32700_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    13.59    10:26:32.63 +11:17:50.2   2884 1497   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    13.69    10:26:32.65 +11:17:51.8   2878 1493   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32725_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 Preparing report for the candidate 32725_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32780_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32780_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    14.01    10:08:10.43 +11:03:55.3   0142 1243   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    14.35    10:08:10.20 +11:03:53.1   0135 1239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32807_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32807_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    14.01    10:08:15.18 +11:23:10.3   0150 1439   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    13.89    10:08:15.13 +11:23:10.0   0143 1435   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32813_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 Preparing report for the candidate 32813_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32837_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32837_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    14.10    10:08:42.85 +10:34:47.5   0231 0949   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    14.12    10:08:42.71 +10:34:46.0   0224 0945   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32847_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32847_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    14.08    10:10:04.23 +11:08:04.6   0428 1295   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    13.98    10:10:04.40 +11:08:06.5   0422 1292   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32879_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32879_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    14.18    10:08:49.29 +11:57:01.7   0228 1786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    14.20    10:08:49.17 +11:57:03.2   0221 1783   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32910_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32910_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    14.36    10:09:21.18 +17:13:19.8   0228 4997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    14.38    10:09:21.25 +17:13:19.6   0222 4993   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32940_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32940_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    14.40    10:11:03.61 +12:09:48.9   0562 1927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    14.55    10:11:03.64 +12:09:47.5   0555 1923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32950_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32950_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    14.32    10:13:22.76 +09:51:50.4   0947 0539   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    14.36    10:13:22.71 +09:51:49.7   0940 0535   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32954_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32954_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    14.46    10:10:44.16 +14:36:46.0   0475 3413   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    14.45    10:10:44.11 +14:36:46.3   0468 3409   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32984_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 The candidate 32984_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 10.44975    2461323.94975    14.59    10:08:45.66 +12:19:20.7   0214 2013   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-47-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0530.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 10.45035    2461323.95035    14.30    10:08:45.68 +12:19:22.2   0207 2009   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_061222_TTUQ1b1x1_2265938_W46ywzgE/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0531.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 10:14:02.06 +10:23:26.0 10:47:07.52 +14:14:58.4 10:59:22.77 +13:41:16.0 10:30:51.47 +13:59:01.4 ########### Completed Leo-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 10:14:02.06 +10:23:26.0 10:47:07.52 +14:14:58.4 10:59:22.77 +13:41:16.0 10:30:51.47 +13:59:01.4 ################################################################################### 10:14:02.06 +10:23:26.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:47:07.52 +14:14:58.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:59:22.77 +13:41:16.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:30:51.47 +13:59:01.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461323.94974834 -observatory V36 14:33:33.84 -17:57:15.2 Mercury (0.0mag) 14:08:30.09 -21:01:34.5 Venus (-4.5mag) 08:37:43.99 +19:43:55.8 Mars (1.0mag) 09:33:45.22 +15:08:09.7 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:42:42.86 +01:38:37.0 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:12:10.59 +20:58:12.5 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:26.22 -00:25:01.4 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:11.47 -23:43:30.4 Pluto (14.5mag) 12:49:35.90 -09:26:11.7 Moon (99.9mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 10 06:22 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461323.94974834: 09:33:51.52 +15:07:35.8 Io (6.1mag) 09:33:40.15 +15:08:37.1 Europa (6.2mag) 09:33:49.09 +15:07:49.6 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:33:17.67 +15:10:39.3 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:33:25.60 +15:28:54.0 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:33:48.19 +15:07:54.6 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:32:17.39 +15:29:35.6 Elara (17.5mag) 09:36:14.94 +14:30:57.0 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:32:25.46 +15:35:00.0 Carme (18.8mag) 00:42:32.53 +01:38:54.8 Titan (8.2mag) 00:42:46.18 +01:38:18.5 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:42:10.41 +01:35:50.9 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:42:26.58 +01:38:37.0 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:41:02.80 +01:26:19.0 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 10 06:22 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461323.94974834: 02:42:12.19 +21:21:06.4 JWST 14:01:07.65 +54:16:07.8 Chandra 07:10:26.04 -11:50:33.3 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 10 06:22 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461323.94974834 -observatory V36 03:46:23.66 +20:11:42.3 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:23:53.24 -33:31:08.8 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:39:25.77 -72:20:25.9 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:57.97 +34:37:24.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 07:29:48.78 +25:28:04.8 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:01:29.47 +35:34:12.1 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:26:34.67 +41:34:03.2 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 19:51:17.52 +46:17:35.3 17.3mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:46:08.21 -13:34:41.4 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:15:20.84 +16:04:18.8 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:50:02.43 -02:38:30.9 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:38:45.83 +65:35:14.2 15.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:37:10.79 +43:25:17.5 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:44:45.43 +14:10:01.8 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:29:03.61 -16:39:19.6 12.9mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 00:29:18.86 +19:07:45.8 16.3mag 2P/Encke 22:57:14.47 -31:54:01.2 14.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:09:32.09 +38:53:25.9 17.0mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:10:36.29 -08:05:10.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:23:01.52 -08:50:31.5 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:34:31.61 +16:06:41.5 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 03:00:59.16 +14:23:08.4 17.6mag 88P/Howell 07:35:33.23 +39:58:42.8 16.6mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:00:26.70 +14:28:54.9 15.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:39:05.34 +13:28:33.6 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 14:04:21.38 -31:56:52.5 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos 06:50:09.92 +19:20:58.6 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 21:47:42.14 +02:38:51.1 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:17:14.08 +35:26:01.1 16.9mag 162P/Siding Spring 10:16:09.34 +01:52:34.7 14.2mag 169P/NEAT 03:29:49.01 +04:43:03.6 17.9mag 220P/McNaught 06:02:02.07 +45:00:45.8 15.6mag 260P/McNaught 07:26:14.99 +25:38:31.6 17.9mag 266P/Christensen 09:55:17.50 +31:41:04.8 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct 10 06:22 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70 ASASSN-26fk 2026-10-5.53 -3.9 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 10 06:22 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 10 06:22 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 10:07:54.049 +19:15:34.49 AT 2026acwn 2026-09-22.52 18.45 21:47:18.820 -13:28:28.70 AT 2026acwm 2026-09-20.60 18.9 10:22:42.936 +19:52:35.40 AT 2026acwl 2026-09-22.00 16.6 12:32:56.280 +02:20:44.16 AT 2026acwk 2026-09-22.00 17.1 13:25:49.608 -05:40:44.04 AT 2026acwj 2026-09-22.00 16.85 10:49:22.944 +11:14:04.20 AT 2026acwi 2026-09-22.00 16.45 12:58:10.368 +23:07:28.20 AT 2026acwh 2026-09-22.00 16.75 12:08:29.616 +04:34:04.08 AT 2026acwg 2026-09-22.00 17.15 05:03:43.381 -03:13:29.20 AT 2026acwf 2026-09-18.50 20.2378 05:01:32.468 -16:09:55.69 SN 2026acwe 2026-09-20.68 19.56 00:32:31.123 +20:31:52.34 AT 2026acwd 2026-09-22.40 20.1165 03:51:00.244 -15:55:10.74 AT 2026acwc 2026-09-24.42 20.0723 03:24:08.838 +04:45:48.58 AT 2026acwb 2026-09-22.50 20.5887 00:56:14.620 +21:03:49.66 AT 2026acwa 2026-09-15.67 21.34 01:04:22.570 +17:24:06.08 AT 2026acvz 2026-09-15.67 21.77 00:36:48.120 +16:29:56.39 AT 2026acvy 2026-09-15.67 21.53 00:35:45.700 +13:42:49.24 AT 2026acvx 2026-09-15.66 21.09 23:43:46.544 +13:43:31.94 AT 2026acvw 2026-09-15.65 21.56 00:41:03.360 +21:24:38.51 AT 2026acvv 2026-09-03.70 19.59 23:28:55.610 +02:07:43.06 AT 2026acvu 2026-07-15.86 22.34 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 10 06:22 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 81 C