Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8711,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3711 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
LMi-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting LMi-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing LMi-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 293954 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 293954 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.png' -> 'transient_report/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits_preview.png'
LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits

renamed 'LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.png' -> 'transient_report/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits_preview.png'
LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 448.9815
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 551.8028
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1757.7612
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 524.8564
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1748.5129
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 524.2980
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.915
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 16.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-10T03:53:38.0066746' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-10T08:53:38.0066746' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61323.3705787733 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-10T08:53:47.9073728' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61323.3706933679 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 147.26966412439 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 37.9996499600149 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.0241666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 54.1863888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.80472881353289 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'LMi-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 49 06' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29505 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29505 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 64.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.08 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 28.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits :)
Spent 0.635989 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 16.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-10T03:54:51.2264317' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-10T08:54:51.2264317' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61323.371426227 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-10T08:55:01.1290674' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61323.3715408449 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 147.269664049152 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 37.9996500085813 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.2327777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 54.3177777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.75531671745067 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'LMi-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 49 06' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29505 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29505 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 64.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.08 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 28.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits :)
Spent 0.534716 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits

fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.87069451
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:06.265 +38:00:05.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Image size: 945.4'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:06.256 +37:57:46.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:49:06.265 +38:00:05.29
Second-epoch image center 09:49:06.256 +37:57:46.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0387 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Image size: 945.2'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:03.784 +37:57:16.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:49:06.265 +38:00:05.29
Second-epoch image center 09:49:03.784 +37:57:16.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0476 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:49:06.256 +37:57:46.04
Second-epoch second image center 09:49:03.784 +37:57:16.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01157 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XQjywoTHxp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1AqiACErja
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zGm85jqeTF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vPll6eUXQ7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits) and catalog (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3440 to 157.6118 deg, Dec +32.0322 to +43.3727 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3440 to 157.6118 deg, Dec 32.0322 to 43.3727 deg
Loaded 5364 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3768 out of 3968 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3968 out of 7760 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.905950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.905950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3440 to 157.6118 deg, Dec +32.0322 to +43.3727 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3440 to 157.6118 deg, Dec 32.0322 to 43.3727 deg
Loaded 5364 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3768 out of 3968 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3968 out of 7760 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 7740 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3423 to 157.6117 deg, Dec +32.0092 to +43.3728 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3423 to 157.6117 deg, Dec 32.0092 to 43.3728 deg
Loaded 5378 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3732 out of 3971 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3971 out of 7740 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
2.2 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
2.5 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
2.5 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
15.7 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
14.2 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
14.2 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.XQjywoTHxp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=529, bad_region=0, passed=7760
Got 7760 stars (including 7222 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7760 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5261)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits N_match=4783 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.223 n_q1=1246 n_q2=1087 n_q3=1261 n_q4=1189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.352
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1AqiACErja (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=564, bad_region=0, passed=7740
Got 7740 stars (including 7160 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7740 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5261)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits N_match=4783 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=1258 n_q2=1088 n_q3=1255 n_q4=1182 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zGm85jqeTF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=208, bad_region=0, passed=3661
Got 3661 stars (including 3447 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3661 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3313 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3313 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 3312 stars left (next iteration limit 3643)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3312 robust_rms=10.581 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.445 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.445 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3312 robust_rms=0.638 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.053 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.053 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3312 robust_rms=0.407 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.552 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.494 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3312 robust_rms_before=1.696 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.331 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.407 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.479 worst_region_rms_after=0.552 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.769 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.494
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.479 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.479 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.331 arcsec matched=3312
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits N_match=3312 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=973 n_q2=590 n_q3=1008 n_q4=741 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.409
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vPll6eUXQ7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=211, bad_region=0, passed=3678
Got 3678 stars (including 3463 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3678 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3324 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3321 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3321 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3321 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3324 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3321 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3321 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 3321 stars left (next iteration limit 3653)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3321 robust_rms=10.701 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.762 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.762 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3321 robust_rms=0.585 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.832 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.832 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3321 robust_rms=0.413 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.564 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.485 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3321 robust_rms_before=1.592 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.413 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.457 worst_region_rms_after=0.564 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.705 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.485
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.457 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.457 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.328 arcsec matched=3321
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits N_match=3321 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=990 n_q2=594 n_q3=991 n_q4=746 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.417
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits sigma_overall=0.270 worst_q_ratio=1.352
ref2=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.194
new1=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits sigma_overall=0.344 worst_q_ratio=1.409
new2=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits sigma_overall=0.336 worst_q_ratio=1.417
reference average sigma_overall=0.3265 worst_q_ratio=1.273
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348_astrometric_residuals.png (4783 matched stars from wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236_astrometric_residuals.png (4783 matched stars from wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456_astrometric_residuals.png (3312 matched stars from wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457_astrometric_residuals.png (3321 matched stars from wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:06.265 +38:00:05.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Image size: 945.4'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:06.256 +37:57:46.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:49:06.265 +38:00:05.29
Second-epoch image center 09:49:06.256 +37:57:46.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0387 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Image size: 945.2'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:03.784 +37:57:16.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:49:06.265 +38:00:05.29
Second-epoch image center 09:49:03.784 +37:57:16.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0476 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:49:06.256 +37:57:46.04
Second-epoch second image center 09:49:03.784 +37:57:16.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01157 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9y9iqPsBp8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BUPtw9e2sc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0s6kcL0sGd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q3nb8vNcap
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits) and catalog (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 40713 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3381 to 157.6201 deg, Dec +31.9947 to +43.3861 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3381 to 157.6201 deg, Dec 31.9947 to 43.3861 deg
Loaded 5394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3582 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 40713 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.802250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.802250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.94
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 40713 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3381 to 157.6201 deg, Dec +31.9947 to +43.3861 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3381 to 157.6201 deg, Dec 31.9947 to 43.3861 deg
Loaded 5394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3582 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 40713 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 40745 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3384 to 157.6207 deg, Dec +31.9963 to +43.3847 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3384 to 157.6207 deg, Dec 31.9963 to 43.3847 deg
Loaded 5394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3546 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 40745 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
2.0 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
2.5 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
2.5 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
15.8 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
14.5 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
14.5 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9y9iqPsBp8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1871, bad_region=1, passed=40697
Got 40697 stars (including 38757 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40697 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4786 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits N_match=4786 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.217 n_q1=1238 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1263 n_q4=1194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.335
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.BUPtw9e2sc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1991, bad_region=9, passed=40726
Got 40726 stars (including 38641 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40726 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4786 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits N_match=4786 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=1243 n_q2=1093 n_q3=1247 n_q4=1203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0s6kcL0sGd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=518, bad_region=41, passed=19886
Got 19886 stars (including 19293 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19886 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4752 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4747 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4746 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4752 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4747 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4747 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4747 stars left (next iteration limit 5220)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4747 robust_rms=10.382 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.814 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.814 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4747 robust_rms=0.642 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.053 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.053 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4747 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.600 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.509 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4747 robust_rms_before=1.713 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.349 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.430 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.494 worst_region_rms_after=0.600 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.805 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.509
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.494 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.494 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.349 arcsec matched=4747
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits N_match=4747 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=1412 n_q2=799 n_q3=1477 n_q4=1059 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.398
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.q3nb8vNcap (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=502, bad_region=41, passed=20116
Got 20116 stars (including 19549 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20116 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4755 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4750 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4750 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4756 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4751 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4751 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4751 stars left (next iteration limit 5225)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4751 robust_rms=10.450 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.420 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.420 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4751 robust_rms=0.592 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.823 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.823 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4751 robust_rms=0.432 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.572 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.514 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4751 robust_rms_before=1.604 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.349 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.432 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.457 worst_region_rms_after=0.572 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.707 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.514
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.457 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.457 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.349 arcsec matched=4751
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits N_match=4751 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=1405 n_q2=796 n_q3=1476 n_q4=1074 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.321
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 09:26:24.28 +39:58:00.5: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 09:41:17.11 +41:42:08.3: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 09:12:32.17 +33:32:38.0: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 10:20:07.38 +32:51:08.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 09:34:51.32 +39:37:37.8: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 09:20:40.64 +39:05:03.9: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:26:24.28 +39:58:00.5: 13.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:12:32.17 +33:32:38.0: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:34:51.32 +39:37:37.8: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:20:07.38 +32:51:08.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:07.38 +32:51:08.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:41:17.11 +41:42:08.3: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:34:51.32 +39:37:37.8: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1643 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:12:32.17 +33:32:38.0: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4820 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:26:24.28 +39:58:00.5: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8608 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:41:17.11 +41:42:08.3: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8689 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:20:40.64 +39:05:03.9: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53681.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52678_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 52678_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.37069 | 2461323.87069 | 14.01 | 09:41:17.08 +41:42:07.6 | 3785 5404 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.37154 | 2461323.87154 | 13.79 | 09:41:17.13 +41:42:09.0 | 3789 5409 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52680_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 52680_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.37069 | 2461323.87069 | 13.77 | 09:26:24.29 +39:58:00.2 | 2101 4331 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.37154 | 2461323.87154 | 14.02 | 09:26:24.28 +39:58:00.7 | 2105 4336 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52681_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 52681_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.37069 | 2461323.87069 | 13.46 | 09:12:32.16 +33:32:40.2 | 0311 0464 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.37154 | 2461323.87154 | 13.50 | 09:12:32.18 +33:32:35.7 | 0316 0469 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52899_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 52899_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.37069 | 2461323.87069 | 11.27 | 10:20:07.36 +32:51:08.9 | 8881 0496 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.37154 | 2461323.87154 | 11.27 | 10:20:07.39 +32:51:07.8 | 8887 0500 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52953_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 52953_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.37154 | 2461323.87154 | 12.29 | 09:18:36.31 +36:47:41.2 | 1147 2430 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits |
**** FOUND 09:18:36.30 +36:47:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53024_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 53024_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.37154 | 2461323.87154 | 12.48 | 09:24:16.39 +36:36:18.4 | 1837 2306 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits |
**** FOUND 09:24:16.38 +36:36:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53143_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 53143_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.37154 | 2461323.87154 | 12.43 | 10:22:08.63 +41:31:48.2 | 8393 5749 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits |
**** FOUND 10:22:08.63 +41:31:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53198_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 53198_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.37154 | 2461323.87154 | 13.02 | 09:23:23.34 +33:26:46.8 | 1701 0389 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits |
**** FOUND 09:23:23.42 +33:26:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53300_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 53300_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 10.37069 | 2461323.87069 | 13.17 | 09:34:51.32 +39:37:38.0 | 3084 4132 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.37154 | 2461323.87154 | 13.16 | 09:34:51.33 +39:37:37.6 | 3088 4137 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53506_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 53506_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.37154 | 2461323.87154 | 13.58 | 09:44:27.08 +40:46:12.1 | 4170 4860 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits |
**** FOUND 09:44:27.27 +40:46:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53583_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 53583_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.37154 | 2461323.87154 | 13.25 | 10:02:57.77 +37:52:28.8 | 6434 3275 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits |
**** FOUND 10:02:57.79 +37:52:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53636_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 53636_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 10.37154 | 2461323.87154 | 13.78 | 09:32:02.77 +40:01:50.4 | 2759 4376 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits |
**** FOUND 09:32:02.78 +40:01:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53681_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
Preparing report for the candidate 53681_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12753_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 12753_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 10.37154 | 2461323.87154 | 10.01 | 09:40:15.23 +36:06:18.8 | 3783 2034 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits |
**** FOUND 09:40:15.21 +36:06:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19140_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 19140_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 10.37154 | 2461323.87154 | 13.46 | 09:49:48.24 +37:44:07.5 | 4884 3069 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06221_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 06221_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 10.37154 | 2461323.87154 | 7.54 | 09:45:34.35 +34:30:44.7 | 4472 1102 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_041344_TTUQ1b1x1_2012548_VEvD4k01/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-54-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits |
**** FOUND 09:45:34.36 +34:30:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
09:20:40.64 +39:05:03.9
########### Completed LMi-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
09:20:40.64 +39:05:03.9
###################################################################################
09:20:40.64 +39:05:03.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461323.87069451 -observatory V36
14:33:13.99 -17:55:17.0 Mercury (0.0mag)
14:08:34.73 -21:01:56.1 Venus (-4.6mag)
08:37:32.99 +19:44:30.6 Mars (1.0mag)
09:33:42.14 +15:08:23.7 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:42:44.24 +01:38:45.6 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:12:11.08 +20:58:13.7 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:26.70 -00:24:58.4 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:11.54 -23:43:30.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
12:44:52.90 -08:55:53.6 Moon (-8.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 10 05:02 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461323.87069451:
09:33:47.31 +15:07:56.1 Io (6.1mag)
09:33:35.94 +15:08:57.4 Europa (6.2mag)
09:33:44.90 +15:08:09.8 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:33:14.45 +15:10:54.1 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:33:22.17 +15:29:09.1 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:33:46.24 +15:08:03.0 Thebe (16.4mag)
09:32:14.10 +15:29:48.5 Elara (17.5mag)
09:36:12.15 +14:31:10.8 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:32:22.73 +15:35:12.8 Carme (18.8mag)
00:42:34.21 +01:39:03.7 Titan (8.2mag)
00:42:47.16 +01:38:26.6 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:42:11.65 +01:35:59.7 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:42:27.98 +01:38:46.4 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:41:04.22 +01:26:27.8 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 10 05:03 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461323.87069451:
02:42:07.04 +21:21:57.0 JWST
13:03:23.06 +52:35:44.6 Chandra
06:55:52.29 -00:45:19.1 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 10 05:02 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461323.87069451 -observatory V36
03:46:25.02 +20:11:41.0 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:23:49.01 -33:31:15.9 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:39:23.82 -72:20:07.0 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:15:58.49 +34:37:15.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
07:29:46.90 +25:28:07.5 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:01:27.17 +35:33:42.0 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:26:33.71 +41:34:16.4 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
19:51:20.77 +46:18:07.9 17.3mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:46:07.92 -13:34:37.6 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:15:12.00 +16:04:42.0 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:49:57.64 -02:38:07.1 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:38:26.11 +65:37:05.5 15.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:37:16.20 +43:25:57.6 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:44:40.83 +14:09:33.3 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:29:01.23 -16:17:51.6 12.9mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
00:29:30.53 +19:08:25.6 16.3mag 2P/Encke
22:57:09.37 -31:55:04.8 14.5mag 10P/Tempel
02:09:26.01 +38:54:10.9 17.0mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:10:33.09 -08:04:47.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:23:04.63 -08:50:22.6 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:34:25.27 +16:07:11.5 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
03:01:03.94 +14:23:21.8 17.6mag 88P/Howell
07:35:16.08 +39:57:18.7 16.6mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
09:00:15.56 +14:30:35.5 15.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:38:55.54 +13:29:38.4 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
14:04:09.42 -31:55:30.5 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:50:06.56 +19:21:10.7 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
21:48:24.49 +02:34:46.5 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:17:03.66 +35:26:19.5 16.9mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:15:57.54 +01:53:42.9 14.2mag 169P/NEAT
03:29:51.62 +04:43:39.8 17.9mag 220P/McNaught
06:01:54.90 +44:59:41.6 15.6mag 260P/McNaught
07:26:08.08 +25:38:38.3 17.9mag 266P/Christensen
09:55:12.68 +31:41:22.0 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct 10 05:02 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70 ASASSN-26fk 2026-10-5.53 -3.9
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 10 05:02 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 10 05:02 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
22:16:29.636 +19:10:17.48 AT 2026acub 2026-09-19.63 21.25
21:26:02.840 +18:32:35.45 AT 2026acua 2026-09-19.63 21.51
23:01:29.050 +13:26:28.84 AT 2026actz 2026-09-16.57 21.6
23:11:56.220 +13:00:12.92 AT 2026acty 2026-09-16.57 21.25
21:27:19.340 +14:52:36.51 AT 2026actx 2026-09-10.70 20.74
23:13:00.900 +27:43:18.56 AT 2026actw 2026-09-10.67 21.38
22:48:58.670 +25:17:22.66 AT 2026actv 2026-09-10.67 20.85
23:08:25.890 +17:23:34.90 AT 2026actu 2026-09-08.70 20.92
23:26:01.650 +04:42:51.59 AT 2026actt 2026-09-20.77 22.65
01:25:10.470 +05:14:45.08 AT 2026acts 2026-09-19.91 22.5
23:54:52.550 +03:52:17.36 AT 2026actr 2026-09-19.82 22.65
01:13:11.200 +04:25:46.09 AT 2026actq 2026-09-19.83 22.51
02:12:52.180 +06:15:33.28 AT 2026actp 2026-09-17.85 22.41
01:15:33.580 +00:34:39.51 AT 2026acto 2026-09-13.84 22.45
01:15:50.690 +03:06:14.05 AT 2026actn 2026-09-13.84 22.42
02:21:01.320 +03:23:34.05 AT 2026actm 2026-09-10.91 22.41
00:57:53.520 +00:50:47.48 AT 2026actl 2026-09-12.89 22.5
02:06:55.930 +05:22:05.89 AT 2026actk 2026-09-19.85 22.99
02:04:41.170 -01:21:54.37 AT 2026actj 2026-09-08.84 22.36
22:01:32.858 -26:38:25.05 AT 2026acti 2026-09-03.36 21.44
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 10 05:02 tns_transients_list.txt