This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3466* 04 12 10.48 +20 58 11.2 7.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8466,7.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3466 7.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3466 2461323.8466 12.03 05:05:34.80 +26:07:00.2
177.39032 -8.93984 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -1 -0 1 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:05:34.80 +26:07:00.2: 14.59 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:05:34.80 +26:07:00.2: 14.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3466* 05 05 34.80 +26 07 00.2 12.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8466,12.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3466 12.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3466* 04 11 49.44 +21 05 57.9 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461323.8466,14.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261010.3466 14.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3466* 04 12 10.48 +20 58 11.2 7.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8466,7.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3466 7.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3466 2461323.8466 12.80 04:08:39.65 +17:47:19.2
175.38084 -24.40867 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato -0 -0 0 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:08:39.65 +17:47:19.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:08:39.65 +17:47:19.2: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3466* 04 08 39.65 +17 47 19.2 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8466,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3466 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3466 2461323.8466 13.02 04:10:20.33 +23:35:41.7
171.07579 -20.16480 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.83 Beatrix -0 -0 0 13.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:10:20.33 +23:35:41.7: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:10:20.33 +23:35:41.7: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3466* 04 10 20.33 +23 35 41.7 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8466,13.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3466 13.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3466 2461323.8466 13.19 04:37:44.63 +25:17:29.9
174.10483 -14.38448 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata -0 0 0 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:44.63 +25:17:29.9: 16.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:44.63 +25:17:29.9: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3466* 04 37 44.63 +25 17 29.9 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8466,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3466 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3466 2461323.8466 13.70 04:33:15.84 +25:48:08.8
173.02683 -14.82466 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia -1 -0 1 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:15.84 +25:48:08.8: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:15.84 +25:48:08.8: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3466* 04 33 15.84 +25 48 08.8 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8466,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3466 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3466 2461323.8466 13.98 04:13:42.48 +23:26:50.7
171.75412 -19.70482 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.162 Laurentia -0 -0 0 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:13:42.48 +23:26:50.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:13:42.48 +23:26:50.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3466* 04 13 42.48 +23 26 50.7 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8466,13.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3466 13.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3466 2461323.8466 13.86 05:02:54.57 +25:00:12.0
177.93775 -10.08478 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.418 Alemannia 0 0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:02:54.57 +25:00:12.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:02:54.57 +25:00:12.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3466* 05 02 54.57 +25 00 12.0 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8466,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3466 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3466 2461323.8466 13.75 04:52:30.86 +17:18:02.6
182.83319 -16.60648 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.631 Philippina 0 -1 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:30.86 +17:18:02.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:30.86 +17:18:02.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3466* 04 52 30.86 +17 18 02.6 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8466,13.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3466 13.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3466 2461323.8466 14.36 04:18:47.60 +23:59:24.0
172.16919 -18.48199 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.341 California 0 -1 1 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:47.60 +23:59:24.0: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:47.60 +23:59:24.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3466* 04 18 47.60 +23 59 24.0 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8466,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3466 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3466 2461323.8466 14.26 04:28:04.78 +17:35:09.9
178.82166 -21.03752 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1171 Rusthawelia -1 -0 1 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:04.78 +17:35:09.9: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:28:04.78 +17:35:09.9: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3466* 04 28 04.78 +17 35 09.9 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8466,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3466 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3466 2461323.8466 14.48 04:53:59.65 +21:31:16.7
179.53874 -13.80807 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.940 Kordula -1 1 1 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:59.65 +21:31:16.7: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:59.65 +21:31:16.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3466* 04 53 59.65 +21 31 16.7 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8466,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3466 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.3466 2461323.8466 14.73 04:44:02.10 +20:28:37.7
178.93054 -16.28759 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.311 Claudia 1 -1 1 15.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:02.10 +20:28:37.7: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:02.10 +20:28:37.7: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.3466* 04 44 02.10 +20 28 37.7 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.8466,14.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.3466 14.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461323.84686985 10.10.2026 08:19:19.555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 26
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12015
Objects passed selection criteria: 12009
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11465.8
Average stars matched: 11160.2 (97.3355 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237292 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 04:32:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461323.84686985 10.10.2026 08:19:19.555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 117
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.96
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 79035
Objects passed selection criteria: 78882
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 73270.8
Average stars matched: 71222.8 (97.2049 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 551392 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 04:33:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.84624826
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:36.173 +22:00:10.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:36.173 +22:00:10.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0773 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:35.743 +22:00:47.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:35.743 +22:00:47.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0808 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:36.173 +22:00:10.70
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:35.743 +22:00:47.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01031 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FUxXccMyQd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ew2UTMwWJx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c21Qc8ejBD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ke9fi4Otko
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.997400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.997400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2796 deg
Loaded 5169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3956 out of 4300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4300 out of 11076 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 26 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.FUxXccMyQd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=0, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 10942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=1283 n_q2=1077 n_q3=1448 n_q4=1036 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ew2UTMwWJx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=897, bad_region=0, passed=11076
Got 11076 stars (including 10166 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1273 n_q2=1107 n_q3=1409 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.c21Qc8ejBD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=640, bad_region=0, passed=11531
Got 11531 stars (including 10878 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11531 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4841 stars left (next iteration limit 5325)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=14.841 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.441 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.441 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=0.487 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.749 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.749 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=0.296 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.507 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.507 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4841 robust_rms_before=1.101 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.296 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.554 worst_region_rms_after=0.507 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.129 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.507
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.554 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.554 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.328 arcsec matched=4841
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits N_match=4841 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1070 n_q2=1346 n_q3=1116 n_q4=1309 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.200
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Ke9fi4Otko (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=625, bad_region=0, passed=11597
Got 11597 stars (including 10962 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11597 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4840 stars left (next iteration limit 5324)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4840 robust_rms=14.802 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.539 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.539 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4840 robust_rms=0.481 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.727 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.727 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4840 robust_rms=0.315 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.526 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.526 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4840 robust_rms_before=1.095 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.332 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.315 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.559 worst_region_rms_after=0.526 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.099 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.526
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.559 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.559 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.332 arcsec matched=4840
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits N_match=4840 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=1070 n_q2=1342 n_q3=1113 n_q4=1315 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.221
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.251
ref2=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.351 worst_q_ratio=1.297
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.200
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.221
reference average sigma_overall=0.3275 worst_q_ratio=1.274
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422_astrometric_residuals.png (4841 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423_astrometric_residuals.png (4840 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:05:34.80 +26:07:00.2: 14.59 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:58:36.40 +22:59:50.0: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:24:24.02 +17:53:04.1: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:44.29 +21:57:43.3: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:52.01 +22:50:30.1: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:50.06 +22:54:24.2: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:59.99 +23:58:09.3: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:06.49 +21:14:33.1: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:07.54 +22:37:22.9: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:58:36.40 +22:59:50.0: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:24:24.02 +17:53:04.1: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:52.01 +22:50:30.1: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:44.29 +21:57:43.3: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:05:34.80 +26:07:00.2: 14.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:58:36.40 +22:59:50.0: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4268 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:24.02 +17:53:04.1: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4650 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:52.01 +22:50:30.1: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2697 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:44.29 +21:57:43.3: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3904 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:05:34.80 +26:07:00.2: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.0256 delta=2.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:50.06 +22:54:24.2: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:59.99 +23:58:09.3: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:50.06 +22:54:24.2: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4810 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:59.99 +23:58:09.3: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5171 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:07.54 +22:37:22.9: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:07.54 +22:37:22.9: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5230 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:06.49 +21:14:33.1: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:06.49 +21:14:33.1: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4959 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:36:23.43 +22:52:16.5: 12.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:33.63 +22:12:43.4: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:56:35.26 +24:00:33.3: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:24.77 +22:49:12.8: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:03:01.88 +24:47:27.1: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:28.82 +23:49:06.9: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:14.97 +20:48:46.5: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:39.69 +21:26:26.9: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:33.63 +22:12:43.4: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:56:35.26 +24:00:33.3: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:36:23.43 +22:52:16.5: 12.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:24.77 +22:49:12.8: 12.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:33.63 +22:12:43.4: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5107 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:35.26 +24:00:33.3: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5433 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:23.43 +22:52:16.5: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5868 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:24.77 +22:49:12.8: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5842 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:03:01.88 +24:47:27.1: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:01.88 +24:47:27.1: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5339 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:28.82 +23:49:06.9: 12.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:14.97 +20:48:46.5: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:28.82 +23:49:06.9: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6004 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:14.97 +20:48:46.5: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5551 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:39.69 +21:26:26.9: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:39.69 +21:26:26.9: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5672 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:41:45.91 +17:55:16.4: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:41:45.91 +17:55:16.4: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:45.91 +17:55:16.4: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5845 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20509.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20368_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20368_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.83 +24:18:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20370_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 20370_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20509_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 20509_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20535_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20535_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20542_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20542_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:16.61 +21:56:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20546_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20546_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.07 +25:24:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20569_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20569_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20571_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20571_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:01.02 +21:09:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20573_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20573_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20576_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20576_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20579_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20579_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20581_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20581_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20582_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20582_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20586_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20586_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20594_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20594_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20596_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20596_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20598_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20598_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20601_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20601_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20603_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20603_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20604_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20604_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20609_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20609_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20617_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20617_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07318_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 07318_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:16.02 +20:38:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.45 +20:15:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 10554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.29 +17:32:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:05:34.80 +26:07:00.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:36.173 +22:00:10.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:36.173 +22:00:10.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0773 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:35.743 +22:00:47.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:35.743 +22:00:47.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0808 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:36.173 +22:00:10.70
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:35.743 +22:00:47.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01031 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ESySLm6SxE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IZy79wEjOA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4m3QKK6EyH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4oZOoPjrYe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.857350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.857350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.90
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.90
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 80651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec +16.4671 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec 16.4671 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 5197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3489 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 80651 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 109 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.8 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ESySLm6SxE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=6242, bad_region=8, passed=86318
Got 86318 stars (including 79890 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4857 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4857 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1260 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1439 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.IZy79wEjOA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=5759, bad_region=1, passed=80631
Got 80631 stars (including 74709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80631 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1222 n_q2=1136 n_q3=1399 n_q4=1098 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.273
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4m3QKK6EyH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=3667, bad_region=46, passed=64132
Got 64132 stars (including 60314 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5336)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=14.917 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.521 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.521 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=0.494 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.746 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.746 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=0.300 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.510 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.510 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4851 robust_rms_before=1.095 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.316 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.300 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.533 worst_region_rms_after=0.510 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.118 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.510
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.533 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.533 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.316 arcsec matched=4851
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=1082 n_q2=1308 n_q3=1137 n_q4=1324 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4oZOoPjrYe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3742, bad_region=46, passed=64094
Got 64094 stars (including 60214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64094 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4847 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5331)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4848 robust_rms=14.815 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.614 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.614 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4848 robust_rms=0.490 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.731 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.731 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4848 robust_rms=0.314 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.504 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.504 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4848 robust_rms_before=1.091 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.325 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.314 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.536 worst_region_rms_after=0.504 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.101 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.504
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.536 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.536 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.325 arcsec matched=4848
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1081 n_q2=1306 n_q3=1136 n_q4=1325 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-18-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033801_TTUQ1b1x1_178776_WKncSY7i/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:16:47.68 +25:23:27.7: 14.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:16:12.72 +21:20:53.1: 13.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:05:20.57 +18:03:20.5: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:07:23.03 +20:19:40.1: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:01:28.13 +16:59:13.7: 14.86 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:28.05 +24:16:22.2: 15.07 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:59:01.65 +22:55:02.3: 14.71 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:35.78 +26:45:49.4: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:07:23.03 +20:19:40.1: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:16:12.72 +21:20:53.1: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:01:28.13 +16:59:13.7: 14.74 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:16:47.68 +25:23:27.7: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:05:20.57 +18:03:20.5: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:23.03 +20:19:40.1: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2880 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:12.72 +21:20:53.1: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9803 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:47.68 +25:23:27.7: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1267 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:28.13 +16:59:13.7: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2583 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:20.57 +18:03:20.5: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2111 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:28:28.05 +24:16:22.2: 14.92 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:28.05 +24:16:22.2: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0484 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:59:01.65 +22:55:02.3: 14.92 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:59:01.65 +22:55:02.3: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7654 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:35.78 +26:45:49.4: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:14:36.69 +20:32:27.9: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:35.78 +26:45:49.4: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9673 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:14:36.69 +20:32:27.9: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:36.69 +20:32:27.9: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1097 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:09:08.02 +21:52:56.4: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:21:45.25 +19:28:44.1: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:08:39.65 +17:47:19.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:10:20.33 +23:35:41.7: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:09:08.02 +21:52:56.4: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:08.02 +21:52:56.4: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6124 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:44.63 +25:17:29.9: 16.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:21:45.25 +19:28:44.1: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:45.25 +19:28:44.1: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4566 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:08:39.65 +17:47:19.2: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:38:35.54 +17:25:28.6: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:10:20.33 +23:35:41.7: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:44.63 +25:17:29.9: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:38:35.54 +17:25:28.6: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:35.54 +17:25:28.6: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4580 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:15.84 +25:48:08.8: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:13:42.48 +23:26:50.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:02:54.57 +25:00:12.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:15.84 +25:48:08.8: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:30.86 +17:18:02.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:13:42.48 +23:26:50.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:02:54.57 +25:00:12.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:30.86 +17:18:02.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:03:15.25 +20:54:50.1: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:03:15.25 +20:54:50.1: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:15.25 +20:54:50.1: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7818 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:08:59.68 +21:40:34.4: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:59.07 +20:19:32.0: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:08:59.68 +21:40:34.4: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:59.68 +21:40:34.4: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1651 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:59.07 +20:19:32.0: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:59.07 +20:19:32.0: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1103 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:42.79 +26:08:35.7: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:42.79 +26:08:35.7: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:42.79 +26:08:35.7: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3013 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:47.60 +23:59:24.0: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:47.60 +23:59:24.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:28.46 +23:36:17.0: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:04.78 +17:35:09.9: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:28.46 +23:36:17.0: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:28.46 +23:36:17.0: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3368 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:28:04.78 +17:35:09.9: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:45.46 +19:20:17.5: 14.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:19:13.90 +23:20:38.0: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:45.46 +19:20:17.5: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:45.46 +19:20:17.5: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2446 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:19:13.90 +23:20:38.0: 14.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:13.90 +23:20:38.0: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4045 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:48.29 +19:42:38.7: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:01:13.56 +23:35:47.3: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:48.29 +19:42:38.7: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:48.29 +19:42:38.7: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3126 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:01.16 +19:10:17.0: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:01:13.56 +23:35:47.3: 14.52 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:13.56 +23:35:47.3: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3918 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:11:02.08 +26:11:38.6: 14.90 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:26.53 +23:36:24.8: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:26.72 +18:49:53.1: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:27:17.72 +23:02:02.3: 14.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:01.16 +19:10:17.0: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:01.16 +19:10:17.0: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3636 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:11:02.08 +26:11:38.6: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:26.53 +23:36:24.8: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:02.08 +26:11:38.6: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6462 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:26.53 +23:36:24.8: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3955 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:26.72 +18:49:53.1: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:26.72 +18:49:53.1: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1950 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:37.50 +22:38:13.0: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:27:17.72 +23:02:02.3: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:51.20 +22:09:14.3: 14.72 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:17.72 +23:02:02.3: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4927 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:37.50 +22:38:13.0: 14.44 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:37.50 +22:38:13.0: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4628 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:02:37.40 +24:08:31.2: 14.44 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:40.81 +26:31:13.7: 14.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:19:43.96 +25:46:09.6: 14.61 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:51.20 +22:09:14.3: 14.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:51.20 +22:09:14.3: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5305 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:21.18 +22:55:30.0: 14.72 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:02:37.40 +24:08:31.2: 14.37 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:37.40 +24:08:31.2: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2797 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:40.81 +26:31:13.7: 14.55 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:19:43.96 +25:46:09.6: 14.53 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:11:50.94 +24:38:38.7: 15.07 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:40.81 +26:31:13.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5293 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:43.96 +25:46:09.6: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5661 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:21.18 +22:55:30.0: 14.71 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:21.18 +22:55:30.0: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5419 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:59.65 +21:31:16.7: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:11:50.94 +24:38:38.7: 14.96 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:50.94 +24:38:38.7: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6824 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:14:41.04 +25:03:48.5: 15.08 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:04:59.52 +21:31:18.7: 15.09 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:11:01.80 +27:02:08.0: 15.01 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:59.65 +21:31:16.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:04:08.39 +25:11:23.4: 14.98 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:10:26.23 +27:08:21.3: 15.40 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:14:41.04 +25:03:48.5: 14.94 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:41.04 +25:03:48.5: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7475 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:04:59.52 +21:31:18.7: 15.31 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:11:01.80 +27:02:08.0: 15.30 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:59.52 +21:31:18.7: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9092 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:01.80 +27:02:08.0: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8773 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:02.10 +20:28:37.7: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:04:08.39 +25:11:23.4: 14.87 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:08.39 +25:11:23.4: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7840 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:10:26.23 +27:08:21.3: 15.28 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:26.23 +27:08:21.3: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8963 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:02.10 +20:28:37.7: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:41.43 +27:05:48.0: 15.40 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:06:10.06 +22:45:45.1: 15.43 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:10:46.31 +22:47:09.7: 15.11 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:06:15.88 +24:52:03.7: 15.04 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:14:59.40 +24:00:13.8: 15.65 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:55.08 +21:36:58.2: 15.50 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:41.43 +27:05:48.0: 15.30 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:41.43 +27:05:48.0: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9047 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:06:10.06 +22:45:45.1: 15.48 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.45 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:10.06 +22:45:45.1: ref_mag=15.45 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0405 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:10:46.31 +22:47:09.7: 14.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:46.31 +22:47:09.7: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8757 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:06:15.88 +24:52:03.7: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:14:59.40 +24:00:13.8: 15.66 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:15.88 +24:52:03.7: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0423 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:55.08 +21:36:58.2: 15.03 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.66 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:59.40 +24:00:13.8: ref_mag=15.66 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0503 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:55.08 +21:36:58.2: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9800 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:09:15.23 +21:55:36.4: 15.24 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:12:44.40 +23:21:12.5: 15.27 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:50.17 +26:12:36.2: 15.36 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:14:00.33 +23:29:44.9: 15.62 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:14:31.53 +17:20:20.6: 15.27 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:46.97 +26:38:35.3: 16.07 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:09:28.35 +25:27:34.4: 15.44 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:09:15.23 +21:55:36.4: 15.11 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:15.23 +21:55:36.4: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0056 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:12:44.40 +23:21:12.5: 15.36 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:44.40 +23:21:12.5: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9364 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:50.17 +26:12:36.2: 15.24 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:50.17 +26:12:36.2: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9189 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:14:00.33 +23:29:44.9: 15.50 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.56 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:00.33 +23:29:44.9: ref_mag=15.56 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0299 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:46.97 +26:38:35.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:14:31.53 +17:20:20.6: 15.62 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.07 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:29:46.97 +26:38:35.3: ref_mag=16.07 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=15.0633 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:31.53 +17:20:20.6: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9908 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:09:28.35 +25:27:34.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:28.35 +25:27:34.4: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=14.9392 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:07:08.70 +22:54:40.8: 15.40 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:21:40.21 +21:00:25.4: 15.67 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:07.67 +25:34:03.9: 15.32 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:32:01.71 +25:42:40.2: 15.65 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:05.05 +23:15:15.4: 16.02 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:19.14 +24:40:21.5: 15.87 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:07:08.70 +22:54:40.8: 15.22 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:08.70 +22:54:40.8: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0905 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:21:40.21 +21:00:25.4: 15.30 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:40.21 +21:00:25.4: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0726 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:07.67 +25:34:03.9: 15.33 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:07.67 +25:34:03.9: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1423 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:32:01.71 +25:42:40.2: 15.40 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:05.05 +23:15:15.4: 16.00 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:01.71 +25:42:40.2: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1583 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.01 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:05.05 +23:15:15.4: ref_mag=16.01 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=15.2690 delta=0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:19.14 +24:40:21.5: 15.94 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.90 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:19.14 +24:40:21.5: ref_mag=15.90 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=15.2296 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:13.43 +22:52:34.5: 15.30 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:02.36 +22:56:42.2: 15.46 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:10.66 +20:43:50.6: 15.25 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:17.86 +18:49:17.7: 15.55 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:02.36 +22:56:42.2: 15.54 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:13.43 +22:52:34.5: 15.15 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:02.36 +22:56:42.2: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.2656 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:13.43 +22:52:34.5: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.2038 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:10.66 +20:43:50.6: 15.52 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:10.66 +20:43:50.6: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1093 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:17.86 +18:49:17.7: 15.77 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.63 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:17.86 +18:49:17.7: ref_mag=15.63 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=15.0636 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out102980.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101550.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101577.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101656.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101903.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102018.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102038.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102046.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102332.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102382.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102768.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102833.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101193_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101193_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101196_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101196_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101220_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101220_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101226_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101226_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101231_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101231_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:28.84 +17:02:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101232_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101232_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101240_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101240_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101241_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 101241_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101244_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101244_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101246_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101246_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101247_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101247_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101252_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101252_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:31.43 +22:04:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101253_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101253_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101254_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101254_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:45.71 +23:58:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101255_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101255_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101256_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101256_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.85 +24:18:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101258_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 101258_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101335_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101335_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.68 +19:10:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101464_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101464_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101534_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101534_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:29.17 +22:48:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101550_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 101550_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101551_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101551_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:47.88 +18:26:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101568_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101568_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:38.39 +22:42:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101577_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 101577_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101656_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 101656_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101674_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101674_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:45.26 +19:58:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101824_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101824_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:07.88 +21:31:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101845_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101845_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101858_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101858_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:08.38 +20:27:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101873_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101873_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:52.89 +23:55:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101875_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101875_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:33.81 +25:48:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101876_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101876_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:14.44 +24:06:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101903_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 101903_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101938_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 101938_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.39 +24:25:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102018_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 102018_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102030_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102030_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:03.74 +20:29:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102038_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 102038_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102046_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 102046_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102053_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102053_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:17.85 +23:59:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102103_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102103_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102148_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102148_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:34.24 +17:20:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102166_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102166_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:54.32 +26:03:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102215_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102215_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102248_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102248_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102267_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102267_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102332_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 102332_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102335_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102335_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:03.65 +21:52:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102368_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102368_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102382_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 102382_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102405_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102405_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:44.50 +21:50:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102427_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102427_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102469_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102469_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102473_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102473_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102475_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102475_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102498_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102498_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:18.07 +23:46:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102502_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102502_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102511_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102511_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:28.80 +20:33:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102522_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102522_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102523_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102523_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102528_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102528_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102536_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102536_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102542_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102542_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102545_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102545_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102567_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102567_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102583_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102583_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102673_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102673_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102710_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102710_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102712_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102712_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102742_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102742_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:49.10 +22:53:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102768_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 102768_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102774_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102774_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102780_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102780_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102785_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102785_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102809_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102809_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102824_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102824_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102833_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 102833_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102913_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102913_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102914_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102914_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102928_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102928_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102937_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102937_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102951_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102951_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102956_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102956_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102963_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102963_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102969_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102969_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:23.39 +20:32:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102972_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102972_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102974_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102974_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102976_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102976_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102980_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102980_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:46.97 +26:38:35.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=15.07, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=16.05)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.132 151375989204468352 067.44598885609 +26.64294915243 14.1555 12.8280 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.132#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102982_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 102982_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103029_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 103029_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103030_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 103030_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103038_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 103038_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103075_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 103075_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103090_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 103090_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103122_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 103122_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103164_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 103164_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103165_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 103165_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103197_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 103197_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103226_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 103226_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103266_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 103266_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.59 +18:37:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06492_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 06492_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:34.81 +26:07:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42047_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 42047_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:16.59 +21:56:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47567_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 47567_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64899_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 64899_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20082_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 20082_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:55.40 +24:28:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64223_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 64223_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:16.01 +20:38:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.45 +20:15:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65103_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 65103_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_03-19-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
