This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.2482* 00 42 45.22 +01 38 51.2 7.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7482,7.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2482 7.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.2482* 00 42 36.88 +01 39 17.0 8.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7482,8.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2482 8.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.2482* 00 42 13.60 +01 36 13.1 10.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7482,10.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2482 10.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.2482* 00 42 45.22 +01 38 51.2 7.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7482,7.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2482 7.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.2482* 00 42 36.87 +01 39 17.1 8.3 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7482,8.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2482 8.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.2482* 00 42 13.60 +01 36 13.0 10.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7482,10.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2482 10.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2482 2461323.7482 12.72 00:48:56.69 +07:33:04.7
121.84611 -55.31519 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.510 Mabella -0 -0 0 12.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:48:56.69 +07:33:04.7: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:48:56.69 +07:33:04.7: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7482,12.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2482 12.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2482 2461323.7482 12.62 00:59:20.34 +01:34:05.8
127.03852 -61.24046 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.58 Concordia -0 -0 0 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:59:20.34 +01:34:05.8: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:59:20.34 +01:34:05.8: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 10.2482* 00 59 20.34 +01 34 05.8 12.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7482,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2482 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2482 2461323.7482 12.78 00:25:34.92 +10:28:38.5
112.60240 -51.87506 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.392 Wilhelmina -1 -0 1 13.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:25:34.92 +10:28:38.5: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:25:34.92 +10:28:38.5: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7482,12.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2482 12.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2482 2461323.7482 13.52 00:52:39.61 +09:58:45.5
123.43072 -52.89126 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1235 Schorria 0 0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:52:39.61 +09:58:45.5: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:52:39.61 +09:58:45.5: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7482,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2482 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2482 2461323.7482 14.14 01:14:23.93 +08:09:47.5
132.69359 -54.27279 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.822 Lalage -1 0 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:14:23.93 +08:09:47.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:14:23.93 +08:09:47.5: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7482,14.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2482 14.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2482 2461323.7482 14.10 00:57:42.57 +05:25:09.4
125.83128 -57.41716 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2251 Tikhov -0 0 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:57:42.57 +05:25:09.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:57:42.57 +05:25:09.4: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7482,14.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2482 14.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.2482 2461323.7482 14.55 01:00:12.61 +04:26:54.9
127.10166 -58.35213 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2286 Fesenkov -0 1 1 14.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:00:12.61 +04:26:54.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:00:12.61 +04:26:54.9: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.7482,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.2482 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
First image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Last image: 2461323.74847838 10.10.2026 05:57:38.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6647
Objects passed selection criteria: 6642
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6200.75
Average stars matched: 5793 (93.4242 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233212 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 02:09:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
First image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Last image: 2461323.74847838 10.10.2026 05:57:38.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 205
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.14
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31485
Objects passed selection criteria: 31414
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30168.2
Average stars matched: 28430.2 (94.239 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253404 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 10 02:10:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.74787969
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.421 +06:00:04.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81
Second-epoch image center 00:51:25.421 +06:00:04.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0044 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:28.057 +05:59:24.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81
Second-epoch image center 00:51:28.057 +05:59:24.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0118 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:25.421 +06:00:04.86
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:28.057 +05:59:24.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01568 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w0GE8Cn3pd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Be51hSKE2D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OeIF0w2ntB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VEAvEqow9e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec +0.6752 to +11.2667 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec 0.6752 to 11.2667 deg
Loaded 4455 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3613 out of 3699 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3699 out of 5718 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.625400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.625400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec +0.6752 to +11.2667 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec 0.6752 to 11.2667 deg
Loaded 4455 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3613 out of 3699 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3699 out of 5718 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 5640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8902 to 20.7787 deg, Dec +0.7135 to +11.2815 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8902 to 20.7787 deg, Dec 0.7135 to 11.2815 deg
Loaded 4441 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3584 out of 3667 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3667 out of 5640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
2.3 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
2.8 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
2.8 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
15.2 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.w0GE8Cn3pd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5718
Got 5718 stars (including 5395 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=1254 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1220 n_q4=1190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Be51hSKE2D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5640
Got 5640 stars (including 5317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5640 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=1266 n_q2=1252 n_q3=1219 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OeIF0w2ntB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=302, bad_region=0, passed=6822
Got 6822 stars (including 6513 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6822 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=13.332 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.589 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.589 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=0.400 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.689 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.689 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=0.251 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.307 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.307 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4911 robust_rms_before=0.944 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.256 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.251 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.328 worst_region_rms_after=0.307 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.061 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.307
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.328 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.256 arcsec matched=4911
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1302 n_q2=1225 n_q3=1253 n_q4=1131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.055
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VEAvEqow9e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=309, bad_region=0, passed=6764
Got 6764 stars (including 6448 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6764 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5404)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=13.335 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.665 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.665 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=0.406 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.671 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.671 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=0.256 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.317 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.317 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4912 robust_rms_before=0.945 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.251 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.256 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.322 worst_region_rms_after=0.317 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.025 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.317
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.322 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.322 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.251 arcsec matched=4912
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=1292 n_q2=1227 n_q3=1256 n_q4=1137 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.118
ref2=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.093
new1=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.266 worst_q_ratio=1.055
new2=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits sigma_overall=0.260 worst_q_ratio=1.093
reference average sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.1055
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968_astrometric_residuals.png (4908 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4911 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285_astrometric_residuals.png (4912 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-56-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-10_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_011234_TTUQ1b1x1_2591905_axEzjD18/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:53:38.69 +06:06:31.5: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:43:41.91 +06:37:16.7: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:49:06.96 +05:59:29.2: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:48:30.82 +05:48:31.1: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:07:08.33 +05:12:39.7: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:17:12.25 +02:00:45.9: 10.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:48:30.82 +05:48:31.1: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:49:06.96 +05:59:29.2: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:43:41.91 +06:37:16.7: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:53:38.69 +06:06:31.5: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:07:08.33 +05:12:39.7: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:48:30.82 +05:48:31.1: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0523 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:49:06.96 +05:59:29.2: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0937 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:38.69 +06:06:31.5: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0261 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:08.33 +05:12:39.7: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1168 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:17:12.25 +02:00:45.9: 10.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:43:41.91 +06:37:16.7: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0554 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.77 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:12.25 +02:00:45.9: ref_mag=10.77 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8378 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:45:11.59 +06:28:53.6: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:45:11.59 +06:28:53.6: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:45:11.59 +06:28:53.6: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1368 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20191_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 20191_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:25:34.91 +10:30:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20192_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 20192_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20198_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 20198_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20225_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 20225_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20241_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 20241_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20338_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 20338_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20341_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 20341_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20342_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 20342_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20349_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 20349_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20350_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 20350_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20357_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 20357_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32468_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 32468_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32469_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 32469_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32470_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 32470_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:25:00.47 +05:59:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32472_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 32472_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32476_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 32476_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32477_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 32477_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:21:32.85 +09:14:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32481_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 32481_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32482_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 32482_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32483_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 32483_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32490_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 32490_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32515_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 32515_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32645_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 32645_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32659_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 32659_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32667_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 32667_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32730_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 32730_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32748_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 32748_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32757_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 32757_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32759_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 32759_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32766_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 32766_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32959_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 32959_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33028_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 33028_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33034_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33034_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:10:17.85 +06:12:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33095_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33095_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33101_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33101_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33147_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33147_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33178_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33178_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:49.26 +00:53:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33267_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33267_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33327_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33327_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33329_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33329_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33368_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 33368_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33374_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33374_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33377_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33377_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33385_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33385_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33389_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33389_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33401_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33401_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33402_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33402_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33405_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33405_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33420_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 33420_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33435_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33435_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33458_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33458_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33466_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33466_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33471_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33471_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33486_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33486_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33489_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33489_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33494_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33494_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33495_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33495_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33498_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33498_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33500_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33500_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33501_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33501_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33510_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33510_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33511_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33511_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33522_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33522_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33543_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33543_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33545_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33545_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33551_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33551_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33552_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33552_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:15.84 +01:23:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33554_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33554_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33556_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33556_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:35.06 +00:56:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33557_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33557_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33559_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33559_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33564_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33564_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33567_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33567_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33569_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33569_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33570_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33570_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33572_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33572_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33577_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33577_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33581_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33581_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:42.54 +07:36:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33582_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33582_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33583_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33583_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33585_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33585_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33591_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33591_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33596_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33596_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33598_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33598_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33599_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33599_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33605_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33605_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33608_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33608_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33615_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33615_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33617_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33617_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33618_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33618_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33619_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33619_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33620_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33620_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33623_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33623_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33638_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33638_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:48:23.13 +07:19:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33645_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33645_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33649_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33649_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33651_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33651_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33661_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33661_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33671_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33671_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33676_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33676_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:54.15 +01:26:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33685_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33685_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33687_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33687_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33688_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33688_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33689_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33689_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33690_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33690_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33698_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33698_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33701_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33701_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33705_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33705_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33714_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33714_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33718_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33718_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33722_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33722_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33728_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33728_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33731_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33731_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33734_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33734_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33738_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33738_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33739_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33739_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33747_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33747_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33751_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33751_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33756_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33756_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33759_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33759_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33761_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33761_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33764_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33764_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33765_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33765_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:46.57 +01:27:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33768_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33768_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33770_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33770_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33771_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33771_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33774_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33774_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:20:47.33 +09:45:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33776_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33776_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33778_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33778_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33784_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33784_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33787_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33787_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33793_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33793_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33794_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33794_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33799_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33799_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33813_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33813_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33815_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33815_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33821_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33821_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33822_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33822_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33826_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33826_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33834_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33834_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33835_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33835_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33841_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33841_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33849_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33849_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33850_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33850_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33861_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33861_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33863_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33863_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:33.07 +01:28:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33866_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33866_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33869_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33869_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33874_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33874_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33876_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33876_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33879_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33879_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33882_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33882_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33883_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33883_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33890_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33890_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33895_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33895_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33897_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33897_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33898_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33898_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33900_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33900_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33902_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33902_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33904_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33904_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33908_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33908_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33916_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33916_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33918_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33918_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33920_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33920_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33922_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33922_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33928_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33928_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33934_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33934_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33941_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33941_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33944_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33944_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33947_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33947_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33952_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33952_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33958_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33958_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:50.21 +01:05:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33960_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33960_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33963_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 33963_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33974_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33974_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33981_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33981_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33992_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33992_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33993_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33993_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34011_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 34011_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:18.06 +00:58:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34012_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 34012_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34015_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 34015_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34030_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 34030_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34041_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 34041_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34052_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 34052_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-10_00-57-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
